The document discusses different human resources management situations that a manager may face, including employees struggling to work together, complaints about leadership, unfulfilled promises from peers, relationship issues with a supervisee, and disconnect between upper management and front-line staff. It then asks which type of support would be most helpful in dealing with these situations: a mentor, a peer to ask questions, or having someone with more experience directly address the problem. The document provides questions to consider when facing difficult situations at work.
2. From this weeks’ discussion board
Describe a human resources management situation that
you are proud of managing well – or describe one that
didn’t go well.
Take five minutes to think about:
• In what ways did you try to help the situation?
• What frustrated you?
• Why did you feel it was necessary to intervene?
• What would you do differently next time?
3. 1. As the Deputy Director, a few Directors that report to you
struggle to work together, which is critical for the success of
the organization.
2. As a trusted member of the organization, you often hear of
employees who complain about the decisions of the
leadership. People come to ask for advice or simply to vent.
3. A peer does not follow through with promises, and while paid
the same as you, you feel they do very little in comparison.
4. A supervisee struggles with relationships, but does very well
at the job itself.
5. You do not feel the “higher ups” in the organization
understand what really happens on “the ground”, and you
question some of their decisions.
4. What do you think you would learn from the most?
A. A mentor who gives advice after listening to your
problem.
B. A critically thinking peer that asks you poignant
questions that enables you to see your problem more
fully and decide for yourself how you want to proceed.
C. Having someone with more experience than you fix a
problem for you so you can see how they would do it.
9. • Are you accountable for the outcome?
• Is it too risky?
• Trust
• What is the worst that could happen?
10. • Get into groups of three or four
• Review the scenario
• Discuss the following:
• If you found yourself in a similar situation, what would be your
normal response? (Be honest with yourself!)
• Identify behaviors that would lead to the Dreaded Drama Triangle.
What are ways to avoid them?
• Is the Empowerment Dynamic a good model to address this
scenario?
• If yes, how would you use it to approach the situation?
• If no, what other types of models or approaches could you
use?
Editor's Notes
My introduction. Even if not an HR professional, Leaders are often responding to HR issues before the HR department may be involved or aware. Sometime when HR does get involved, the choices already made have made the situation worse or just more complicated than it needs to be. Leaders have an opportunity to increase the ability of those they are leading to solve some of their own problems, creating a learning opportunity rather than the leader simply making a decision or fixing a problem. Today’s session will be about shifting leadership focus from the typical problem solving mode, to more of a proactive learning and growth focus.
While students are coming in. After the intro, come back to this and ask if there is anything people wanted to discuss more in class, or any ah-ha’s they had when I asked these questions.
As a leader or HR professional we are called on often to respond to conflicts, ethical dilemmas (perceived or valid), and performance concerns. Listed here are a couple scenarios that we will take a deeper look at in class. First, I want you as a group to pick the two that you feel would be the best to dive into deeper.
Vote
Stephen Karpman – psychological and social model of human interaction, developed in 1968. You don’t need three different people for this to show up. The situation plays out when a situation arises and a person takes a role as victim or persecutor. Others then take the other roles.[7] Thereafter "the two players move around the triangle, thus switching roles",[7] so that for example the victim turns on the rescuer, the rescuer switches to persecuting—or as often happens the rescuer ends up entering the situation and becoming a victim. Think Damsel in Distress, Hero, and the Villain. Where do we see this occur?
Victim is further victimized, even by the rescuer. Why? They never are empowered to solve their own problems. Take a minute to think of times where you have been in each of these roles. How did it feel? What role do you often find yourself in?
David Emerald’s book, The Power of TED. The persecutor of victim becomes the challenger who offers productive criticism and motivates someone to become better. Could be healthy competition with a competitor as in sports, could be a long lasting friend that knows you well and doesn’t let you get away with anything (roommate from undergrad). Difference is forward focus rather than blaming or trying to control the other. Coach or mentor helps you see new things, learn, supportive and cultivates empowerment. Victim becomes creator who sees that they are in control of their own reactions to situations, acts from a place of knowing the vision from what they want in their life. Problems are challenges to be learned from.
Which one do you think this approach falls under?
The Empowerment Dynamic focuses on the Vision or Outcome with steps towards that vision using the passions of those involved to get there. Notice this focus does not have room for blame. I see it as a more proactive, collaborative approach. What would be required to move from the Problem focused, Drama Triangle, to the Vision focused Empowerment dynamic?