AEP - Public Service Company of Oklahoma
How a $150 sensor saved $15,000 and other fun
facts: Why you want to commission your building? What is Building Commissioning...The Building Commissioning Process…
Presented by Michael Chimack, PE, PMP, QCxP, CEM
Date: October 27, 2016
2. 11/10/2016
2
Today’s Agenda
• What is Building Commissioning?
• History, nomenclature
• How does it work?
• What is the value proposition?
• How did a sensor save so much money?
• How you can maximize the PSO incentives to reduce my energy use!
• Hall of Shame.
“Building Commissioning Industry…” Why?
• Most buildings are old (>20 years) and were designed on a lowest first cost basis
• Many systems were overdesigned which leads to performance and efficiency loss
when operating buildings at “normal conditions”
• Current facility requirements are different than original design
• Months, seasons, years of deferred maintenance (reactionary maintenance)
• Understaffed operations personnel who are more like “fire fighters”
• Could use more training
• Stricter/new codes, mandates, desire for “green” buildings
3. 11/10/2016
3
Progression of the Industry
Origination
Creation and Definition
ASHRAE and BPA define and test
Federal Government issues first
executive order
Early adopters implement and
provide first case studies
Accepted
Market accepts Cx as
standard practice
Utilities develop programs
Retro Commissioning created
for existing buildings
Streamlines processes and
definition, resulting in proven
energy and operational savings
Technology leveraged to create
tools for better analysis of
data
First government agencies
pass new Cx code
Certification programs started
to standardize professional
training
Comprehensive
Focus on end to end delivery
Market demands comprehensive
solution including Retro and Persistent
commissioning together
The focus is implementation
for recommendations from
Retro and Persistent Cx with
focus on productivity of customers’
people and processes, with
technology as the enabler
As in the past, actionable
information is provided to make
better decisions, and now scope
is expanded to:
Data analytics and
optimization strategies
Remote monitoring and
maintenance of systems
Proactive service
Energy Management
Sustainability
Mid 80s to mid 90sMid 90s to mid 00sMid 00s to present
What is Building Commissioning…
"…a systematic process for investigating, analyzing,
and optimizing the performance of building systems
through the identification and implementation of low/no cost
and capital intensive Facility Improvement Measures and
ensuring their continued performance over time. The Existing
Building Commissioning process assists in making the building
systems perform interactively to meet the Current Facility
Requirements.
"Commissioning is arguably the single most cost-effective strategy for reducing
energy, costs, and greenhouse gas emissions in buildings today."
Evan Mills, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
4. 11/10/2016
4
Industry Data
Commissioning Nomenclature
Type of Commissioning Description Purpose
Commissioning (Cx) • For new buildings
• Structured verification of systems
against intended design
Ensure the building will operate
per customer needs
(lowest LCC, "Life Cycle Cost")
Re‐Commissioning (ReCx) • Existing building
• Has previously been commissioned
• Usually done every 3–5 years
Maintain optimal performance
Retro‐Commissioning
Aka "Existing Building
Commissioning" and "Total Building
Commissioning"
• Existing building
• Has NOT previously been
commissioned
• May include corrections and repairs
before commissioning
• Create building operations
spec (CFR)
• Identify and implement low
and no cost improvements
Monitoring‐Based Commissioning
(MBCx)
Aka "On‐going Commissioning" and
"Continuous Commissioning"
• Existing commissioned building
• Monitor key indicators to confirm
optimal performance
Maintain optimal performance
and identify additional
improvement opportunities
6. 11/10/2016
6
Customer Facility Requirements (CFRs)
• CFRs are the specification to which a building is commissioned
• Accurate CFRs are essential to a successful EBCx project
• Part of the Assessment Phase (Commissioning Plan)
• Need input from all the building stakeholders
• Cast a wide net when identifying stakeholders
• CFRs define requirements only
• Commissioning process will determine solutions
How can EBCx Improve Operations and Save Energy?
•Design deficiencies that have never
been addressed
•Systems or components
not being maintained
•Operational approaches
that waste energy
•Control strategies
that are not optimal
Identify Corrections Needed
• Oversized equipment
• Undersized distribution
• Short‐circuiting of flows
• Sensors in wrong or poor location
• Improper zoning
• Tenant improvements that didn't
address changed HVAC needs
8. 11/10/2016
8
Multi Facility Planning Phase
Key Activities
Deliverables
1. Create EBCx program
planning team
2. Define EBCx program goals
and objective
3. Develop EBCx program plan
4. Performance and Savings
Verification Approach
5. Assessment phase pre
planning
EBCx Program Plan
Facilities ranked
Project
Development
Multi‐facility
Planning
Assessment Investigation
Implementation Hand Off
Persistence
Phase
Assessment Phase (Plan)
Key Activities Deliverables
Perform Assessment
• Assign proj. team and roles
• Kick off meeting/CFRs
• Obtain any missing fac. data
• Initial EBCx plan and implementation budget
• Develop plan for trending/trend
• Identify initial issues
• Estimate savings and costs
• Develop Systems Manual outline
• Develop M&V requirements
• Develop report formats
Assessment Report
• Current Facility Requirements
• EBCx Plan
• Draft Investigation Plan
• Draft Implementation Plan
• Draft Training Plan
• Issues Matrix
• Initial issues with estimated
savings/costs
• Updated implementation budget
Project
Development
Multi‐facility
Planning
Assessment Investigation
Implementation Hand Off
Persistence
Phase
9. 11/10/2016
9
Investigation Phase (Identify)
Investigate Systems
• Review of documents/records
• Update Investigation Plan
• Assess condition and analyze performance of systems
• Continue issue identification
• Estimate savings and costs
• Rank recommendations
• Update Implementation Plan
• Update Training Plan
• Obtain quotes for 3rd party work (if applicable)
Investigation Report
• Updated Current Facility
Requirements
• Updated EBCx Plan
• Updated Issues Matrix with
benefits analyses
• Updated Implementation
Budget
• Measurement data
(e.g., trend logs)
• Implementation plan
Key Activities Deliverables
Project
Development
Multi‐facility
Planning
Assessment Investigation
Implementation Hand Off
Persistence
Phase
Implementation Phase (Change)
Key Activities Deliverables
Implement Opportunities
• Update Implementation Plan
• Select appropriate implementers for each issue identified
• Conduct independent testing and evaluation of
implemented recommendations
• Per Verification Plan
• Compare predicted performance enhancements with actual
• Reevaluate if necessary
• Update Training Plan
Implementation Report
• Updated EBCx Plan
• Implementation Plan
• Verification Plan
• Training Plan
• Updated Issues Matrix with benefits
analyses
• Updated Systems Manual
Project
Development
Multi‐facility
Planning
Assessment Investigation
Implementation Hand Off
Persistence
Phase
10. 11/10/2016
10
Hand‐Off Phase (Train)
Key Activities Deliverables
Train Staff
• Verify training effectiveness
• Conduct Lessons Learned Workshop
• Finalize MBCx Plan/Proposal
• Complete Systems Manual
• Transfer final report
to customer
• Update EBCx Plan
for MBCx
Final EBCx Report
• Final Systems Manual
• Complete EBCx Report
• Final issues Matrix
• M&V report
• Updated EBCx Plan
• Monitoring Based
Commissioning Plan
• Lessons Learned Report
Project
Development
Multi‐facility
Planning
Assessment Investigation
Implementation Hand Off
Persistence
Phase
Persistence Phase (Maintain)
Key Activities Deliverables
• Revisit and review previous customer data (e.g., non‐
implemented opportunities)
• Create a strategy for on‐going monitoring of systems
• Identify additional ECMs and possible FIMs
(facility improvement measures) for potential
implementation
Periodic Reports
• Persistent verification
of savings from implemented
measures
• Recommendations
for other improvements
Project
Development
Multi‐facility
Planning
Assessment Investigation
Implementation Hand Off
Persistence
Phase
11. 11/10/2016
11
• Operational costs will naturally
escalate throughout the building's
lifecycle
• Implementing an EBCx project
lowers operational costs significantly
• Supply-side services such as energy
procurement consulting further
lowers operational costs
• Without demand-side and supply-
side on-going services, operational
costs can rise to original levels
• Savings persist through implemen-
tation of persistence methodology
• Savings increase as additional
opportunities are identified and
additional FIMs are implemented
• EBCx cost << Total realized value
Value of an Existing Building Commissioning Program
LEGEND
One-time Project Fees
On-going Service Fees
Implement
EBCx
Implement
Supply-side
Services
Implement
Additional
FIMs
ADDED VALUE
Value Proposition
BuildingOperationalCosts Existing Buildings
Years of Operation
Implement
MBCx
So…how did a $150 sensor save $15,000?
• Commissioned a 500 ksf building (4 floors) in Palo Alto, CA
• Typical commercial office building
• Constructed in early 1980’s
• Objectives of Cx project
• Reduce energy consumption by 10‐20%
• Ability to partner with their real estate management companies
• Prove energy savings through M&V (trends, reports, etc.)
12. 11/10/2016
12
Issues & Results
• Documented dozens of issues (sensors to improper air changes)
• Documented existing sequence of operations (SOO) and developed new SOO
based on current facility requirements.
• Programed new SOO into BAS and completed prescribed functional testing.
• Identification and execution of 10 highest priority issues predicted an energy
savings of over $58,000 per year (11% savings)
• One outdoor temperature sensor for 4 AHUs, two problems...
It was reading high by 5oF AND it was improperly installed
• BIN analysis demonstrated savings of ~$11,000 (verified to >$15,000)
Finally, for the 10 implemented measures:
• Total first year measured savings > $79,000 (15% savings)
PSO EBCx Rebate offering
• PSO Business rebates ran Retrocommissioning program since 2013.
• The PSO Business Rebates RCX program has evolved overtime
• Now it is currently offered under PSO Custom program for performance based RCx
projects.
• The reason behind the performance based approach is to ensure that Customers are
getting what they are expecting
• If you are interested in these programs we have PSO Custom program Specialist here:
Jiten Gautam.
• You can also visit the PSO business rebates booth outside.
13. 11/10/2016
13
PSO program Project Example
• Location: Tulsa
• Building Type: Stand Alone Commercial building
• Building Type: Retail Fast Food Restaurant and
Party Services
• Building SF: 93,000 SF
• Existing/Baseline Energy Usage: 1,995,873 KWH
• Proposed Savings: 9.92%
• Actual Savings Weekdays: 29.72 %
• Actual Savings Weekends: 11.63 %
Graph Courtesy: Trane
Before
After
Existing Building Commissioning‐Summary
• 5‐30% reduction in utility expenditures
• Improved operational efficiency/fewer operational issues
• Greener building portfolio
• Control costs by actively managing demand‐side energy use and
potentially supply‐side energy costs
• Additional business value for vertical market (e.g. better test scores
in schools, better productivity in office/manufacturing, address
compliance issues in hospitals and labs, etc.)
• You get a Systems Manual‐repository of building information
What is the value to the you?
• CxA is a comprehensive building performance and energy
optimization program designed to drastically improve the way
facility managers operate their facilities.
• Rigorous, process‐based methodology to ensure current facility
requirements are defined and the building(s) and corresponding
operating systems are made to meet the requirements using the
minimum amount of energy.
What is it?
Don’t forget…
• Identifying issues without implementing changes saves you ZERO!!
• Watch out for people selling “black box” solutions
Most favorable building characteristics
• Highly dissatisfied with current facility operation
• High energy users (combined utilities >$500K annually)
• Have goals to reduce GHG and/or utility budget
• Have goals to become LEED certified
• Want to understand how to operate their buildings more efficiently,
including addressing deferred building maintenance
• Have a budget for implementing building improvements