SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 41
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.1
Chapter 8: Deadlocks
System Model
Deadlock Characterization
Methods for Handling Deadlocks
Deadlock Prevention
Deadlock Avoidance
Deadlock Detection
Recovery from Deadlock
Combined Approach to Deadlock Handling
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.2
The Deadlock Problem
A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and
waiting to acquire a resource held by another process in
the set.
Example
System has 2 tape drives.
P1 and P2 each hold one tape drive and each needs another
one.
Example
semaphores A and B, initialized to 1
P0 P1
wait (A); wait(B)
wait (B); wait(A)
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.3
Bridge Crossing Example
Traffic only in one direction.
Each section of a bridge can be viewed as a resource.
If a deadlock occurs, it can be resolved if one car backs
up (preempt resources and rollback).
Several cars may have to be backed up if a deadlock
occurs.
Starvation is possible.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.4
System Model
Resource types R1, R2, . . ., Rm
CPU cycles, memory space, I/O devices
Each resource type Ri has Wi instances.
Each process utilizes a resource as follows:
request
use
release
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.5
Deadlock Characterization
Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use
a resource.
Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource
is waiting to acquire additional resources held by other
processes.
No preemption: a resource can be released only
voluntarily by the process holding it, after that process
has completed its task.
Circular wait: there exists a set {P0, P1, …, P0} of
waiting processes such that P0 is waiting for a resource
that is held by P1, P1 is waiting for a resource that is held
by
P2, …, Pn–1 is waiting for a resource that is held by
Pn, and P0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P0.
Deadlock can arise if four conditions hold simultaneously.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.6
Resource-Allocation Graph
V is partitioned into two types:
P = {P1, P2, …, Pn}, the set consisting of all the processes in
the system.
R = {R1, R2, …, Rm}, the set consisting of all resource types in
the system.
request edge – directed edge P1 → Rj
assignment edge – directed edge Rj → Pi
A set of vertices V and a set of edges E.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.7
Resource-Allocation Graph (Cont.)
Process
Resource Type with 4 instances
Pi requests instance of Rj
Pi is holding an instance of Rj
Pi
Pi
Rj
Rj
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.8
Example of a Resource Allocation
Graph
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.9
Resource Allocation Graph With A
Deadlock
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.10
Resource Allocation Graph With A Cycle But No
Deadlock
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.11
Basic Facts
If graph contains no cycles ⇒ no deadlock.
If graph contains a cycle ⇒
if only one instance per resource type, then deadlock.
if several instances per resource type, possibility of
deadlock.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.12
Methods for Handling Deadlocks
Ensure that the system will never enter a deadlock state.
Allow the system to enter a deadlock state and then
recover.
Ignore the problem and pretend that deadlocks never
occur in the system; used by most operating systems,
including UNIX.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.13
Deadlock Prevention
Mutual Exclusion – not required for sharable
resources; must hold for nonsharable resources.
Hold and Wait – must guarantee that whenever a
process requests a resource, it does not hold any other
resources.
Require process to request and be allocated all its
resources before it begins execution, or allow process to
request resources only when the process has none.
Low resource utilization; starvation possible.
Restrain the ways request can be made.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.14
Deadlock Prevention (Cont.)
No Preemption –
If a process that is holding some resources requests
another resource that cannot be immediately allocated to it,
then all resources currently being held are released.
Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for
which the process is waiting.
Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old
resources, as well as the new ones that it is requesting.
Circular Wait – impose a total ordering of all resource
types, and require that each process requests resources
in an increasing order of enumeration.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.15
Deadlock Avoidance
Simplest and most useful model requires that each
process declare the maximum number of resources of
each type that it may need.
The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically examines
the resource-allocation state to ensure that there can
never be a circular-wait condition.
Resource-allocation state is defined by the number of
available and allocated resources, and the maximum
demands of the processes.
Requires that the system has some additional a priori information
available.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.16
Safe State
When a process requests an available resource, system must
decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe state.
System is in safe state if there exists a safe sequence of all
processes.
Sequence <P1, P2, …, Pn> is safe if for each Pi, the resources
that Pi can still request can be satisfied by currently available
resources + resources held by all the Pj, with j<I.
If Pi resource needs are not immediately available, then Pi can wait
until all Pj have finished.
When Pj is finished, Pi can obtain needed resources, execute, return
allocated resources, and terminate.
When Pi terminates, Pi+1 can obtain its needed resources, and so on.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.17
Basic Facts
If a system is in safe state ⇒ no deadlocks.
If a system is in unsafe state ⇒ possibility of deadlock.
Avoidance ⇒ ensure that a system will never enter an
unsafe state.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.18
Safe, Unsafe , Deadlock State
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.19
Resource-Allocation Graph
Algorithm
Claim edge Pi → Rj indicated that process Pj may request
resource Rj; represented by a dashed line.
Claim edge converts to request edge when a process
requests a resource.
When a resource is released by a process, assignment
edge reconverts to a claim edge.
Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.20
Resource-Allocation Graph For Deadlock
Avoidance
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.21
Unsafe State In Resource-Allocation Graph
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.22
Banker’s Algorithm
Multiple instances.
Each process must a priori claim maximum use.
When a process requests a resource it may have to wait.
When a process gets all its resources it must return them
in a finite amount of time.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.23
Data Structures for the Banker’s
Algorithm
Available: Vector of length m. If available [j] = k, there are
k instances of resource type Rj available.
Max: n x m matrix. If Max [i,j] = k, then process Pi may
request at most k instances of resource type Rj.
Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k then Pi is
currently allocated k instances of Rj.
Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then Pi may need k
more instances of Rj to complete its task.
Need [i,j] = Max[i,j] – Allocation [i,j].
Let n = number of processes, and m = number of resources types.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.24
Safety Algorithm
1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n,
respectively. Initialize:
Work = Available
Finish [i] = false for i - 1,3, …, n.
2. Find and i such that both:
(a) Finish [i] = false
(b) Needi ≤ Work
If no such i exists, go to step 4.
3. Work = Work + Allocationi
Finish[i] = true
go to step 2.
4. If Finish [i] == true for all i, then the system is in a safe
state.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.25
Resource-Request Algorithm for Process
Pi
Request = request vector for process Pi. If Requesti [j] = k
then process Pi wants k instances of resource type Rj.
1. If Requesti ≤ Needi go to step 2. Otherwise, raise error
condition, since process has exceeded its maximum claim.
2. If Requesti ≤ Available, go to step 3. Otherwise Pi must
wait, since resources are not available.
3. Pretend to allocate requested resources to Pi by modifying
the state as follows:
Available = Available = Requesti;
Allocationi = Allocationi + Requesti;
Needi = Needi – Requesti;;
• If safe ⇒ the resources are allocated to Pi.
• If unsafe ⇒ Pi must wait, and the old resource-allocation
state is restored
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.26
Example of Banker’s Algorithm
5 processes P0 through P4; 3 resource types A
(10 instances),
B (5instances, and C (7 instances).
Snapshot at time T0:
Allocation Max Available
A B C A B C A B C
P0 0 1 0 7 5 3 3 3 2
P1 2 0 0 3 2 2
P2 3 0 2 9 0 2
P3 2 1 1 2 2 2
P4 0 0 2 4 3 3
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.27
Example (Cont.)
The content of the matrix. Need is defined to be Max –
Allocation.
Need
A B C
P0 7 4 3
P1 1 2 2
P2 6 0 0
P3 0 1 1
P4 4 3 1
The system is in a safe state since the sequence < P1, P3, P4,
P2, P0> satisfies safety criteria.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.28
Example P1 Request (1,0,2) (Cont.)
Check that Request ≤ Available (that is, (1,0,2) ≤ (3,3,2) ⇒
true.
Allocation Need Available
A B C A B C A B C
P0 0 1 0 7 4 3 2 3 0
P1 3 0 2 0 2 0
P2 3 0 1 6 0 0
P3 2 1 1 0 1 1
P4 0 0 2 4 3 1
Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence <P1, P3, P4,
P0, P2> satisfies safety requirement.
Can request for (3,3,0) by P4 be granted?
Can request for (0,2,0) by P0 be granted?
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.29
Deadlock Detection
Allow system to enter deadlock state
Detection algorithm
Recovery scheme
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.30
Single Instance of Each Resource
Type
Maintain wait-for graph
Nodes are processes.
Pi → Pj if Pi is waiting for Pj.
Periodically invoke an algorithm that searches for a cycle
in the graph.
An algorithm to detect a cycle in a graph requires an
order of n2
operations, where n is the number of vertices
in the graph.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.31
Resource-Allocation Graph and Wait-for
Graph
Resource-Allocation Graph Corresponding wait-for graph
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.32
Several Instances of a Resource
Type
Available: A vector of length m indicates the number of
available resources of each type.
Allocation: An n x m matrix defines the number of
resources of each type currently allocated to each
process.
Request: An n x m matrix indicates the current request
of each process. If Request [ij] = k, then process Pi is
requesting k more instances of resource type. Rj.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.33
Detection Algorithm
1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n,
respectively Initialize:
(a) Work = Available
(b) For i = 1,2, …, n, if Allocationi ≠ 0, then
Finish[i] = false;otherwise, Finish[i] = true.
2. Find an index i such that both:
(a) Finish[i] == false
(b) Requesti ≤ Work
If no such i exists, go to step 4.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.34
Detection Algorithm (Cont.)
3. Work = Work + Allocationi
Finish[i] = true
go to step 2.
4. If Finish[i] == false, for some i, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then the system is in
deadlock state. Moreover, if Finish[i] == false, then Pi is
deadlocked.
Algorithm requires an order of O(m x n2)
operations to detect
whether the system is in deadlocked state.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.35
Example of Detection Algorithm
Five processes P0 through P4;three resource types
A (7 instances), B (2 instances), and C (6 instances).
Snapshot at time T0:
Allocation Request Available
A B C A B C A B C
P0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P1 2 0 0 2 0 2
P2 3 0 3 0 0 0
P3 2 1 1 1 0 0
P4 0 0 2 0 0 2
Sequence <P0, P2, P3, P1, P4> will result in Finish[i] = true
for all i.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.36
Example (Cont.)
P2 requests an additional instance of type C.
Request
A B C
P0 0 0 0
P1 2 0 1
P2 0 0 1
P3 1 0 0
P4 0 0 2
State of system?
Can reclaim resources held by process P0, but insufficient
resources to fulfill other processes; requests.
Deadlock exists, consisting of processes P1, P2, P3, and P4.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.37
Detection-Algorithm Usage
When, and how often, to invoke depends on:
How often a deadlock is likely to occur?
How many processes will need to be rolled back?
one for each disjoint cycle
If detection algorithm is invoked arbitrarily, there may be
many cycles in the resource graph and so we would not
be able to tell which of the many deadlocked processes
“caused” the deadlock.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.38
Recovery from Deadlock: Process Termination
Abort all deadlocked processes.
Abort one process at a time until the deadlock cycle is
eliminated.
In which order should we choose to abort?
Priority of the process.
How long process has computed, and how much longer to
completion.
Resources the process has used.
Resources process needs to complete.
How many processes will need to be terminated.
Is process interactive or batch?
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.39
Recovery from Deadlock: Resource
Preemption
Selecting a victim – minimize cost.
Rollback – return to some safe state, restart process for
that state.
Starvation – same process may always be picked as
victim, include number of rollback in cost factor.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.40
Combined Approach to Deadlock
Handling
Combine the three basic approaches
prevention
avoidance
detection
allowing the use of the optimal approach for each of
resources in the system.
Partition resources into hierarchically ordered classes.
Use most appropriate technique for handling deadlocks
within each class.
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.41
Traffic Deadlock for Exercise 8.4

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Deadlock
DeadlockDeadlock
Deadlock
 
Chapter 8 Operating Systems silberschatz : deadlocks
Chapter 8 Operating Systems silberschatz : deadlocksChapter 8 Operating Systems silberschatz : deadlocks
Chapter 8 Operating Systems silberschatz : deadlocks
 
Deadlock
DeadlockDeadlock
Deadlock
 
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
Chapter 7 - DeadlocksChapter 7 - Deadlocks
Chapter 7 - Deadlocks
 
Bankers
BankersBankers
Bankers
 
Deadlock
DeadlockDeadlock
Deadlock
 
Ch8 OS
Ch8 OSCh8 OS
Ch8 OS
 
Ch8
Ch8Ch8
Ch8
 
Gp1242 007 oer ppt
Gp1242 007 oer pptGp1242 007 oer ppt
Gp1242 007 oer ppt
 
Deadlocks in operating system
Deadlocks in operating systemDeadlocks in operating system
Deadlocks in operating system
 
O ssvv62015
O ssvv62015O ssvv62015
O ssvv62015
 
Dead Lock In Operating Systems
Dead Lock In Operating SystemsDead Lock In Operating Systems
Dead Lock In Operating Systems
 
Deadlocks
Deadlocks Deadlocks
Deadlocks
 
Operating System
Operating SystemOperating System
Operating System
 
OS - Deadlock
OS - DeadlockOS - Deadlock
OS - Deadlock
 
Deadlocks
 Deadlocks Deadlocks
Deadlocks
 
Deadlock avoidance (Safe State, Resource Allocation Graph Algorithm)
Deadlock avoidance (Safe State, Resource Allocation Graph Algorithm)Deadlock avoidance (Safe State, Resource Allocation Graph Algorithm)
Deadlock avoidance (Safe State, Resource Allocation Graph Algorithm)
 
Lect05
Lect05Lect05
Lect05
 
Mca ii os u-3 dead lock & io systems
Mca  ii  os u-3 dead lock & io systemsMca  ii  os u-3 dead lock & io systems
Mca ii os u-3 dead lock & io systems
 
Deadlock
DeadlockDeadlock
Deadlock
 

Similar to Ch8: Deadlocks

Similar to Ch8: Deadlocks (20)

Galvin-operating System(Ch8)
Galvin-operating System(Ch8)Galvin-operating System(Ch8)
Galvin-operating System(Ch8)
 
7.Dead Locks
7.Dead Locks7.Dead Locks
7.Dead Locks
 
ch7- Deadlock.ppt
ch7- Deadlock.pptch7- Deadlock.ppt
ch7- Deadlock.ppt
 
Deadlocks
DeadlocksDeadlocks
Deadlocks
 
Deadlock in OS
Deadlock in OSDeadlock in OS
Deadlock in OS
 
deadlock.pptx
deadlock.pptxdeadlock.pptx
deadlock.pptx
 
ch7Deadlock.ppt
ch7Deadlock.pptch7Deadlock.ppt
ch7Deadlock.ppt
 
Lecture # 10-11 for deadlock operating system.ppt
Lecture # 10-11 for deadlock operating system.pptLecture # 10-11 for deadlock operating system.ppt
Lecture # 10-11 for deadlock operating system.ppt
 
ch7.ppt
ch7.pptch7.ppt
ch7.ppt
 
Galvin Operating Systems of deadlock.ppt
Galvin Operating Systems of deadlock.pptGalvin Operating Systems of deadlock.ppt
Galvin Operating Systems of deadlock.ppt
 
ch7.ppt
ch7.pptch7.ppt
ch7.ppt
 
MPMC chapter
MPMC chapterMPMC chapter
MPMC chapter
 
Chapter 7
Chapter 7Chapter 7
Chapter 7
 
Chapter 5(five).pdf
Chapter 5(five).pdfChapter 5(five).pdf
Chapter 5(five).pdf
 
Deadlocks
DeadlocksDeadlocks
Deadlocks
 
Deadlock Detection Algorithm
Deadlock Detection AlgorithmDeadlock Detection Algorithm
Deadlock Detection Algorithm
 
Ice
IceIce
Ice
 
ch8.pptx
ch8.pptxch8.pptx
ch8.pptx
 
CH07.pdf
CH07.pdfCH07.pdf
CH07.pdf
 
Deadlock : operating system ( BTECH CSE )
Deadlock : operating system ( BTECH CSE )Deadlock : operating system ( BTECH CSE )
Deadlock : operating system ( BTECH CSE )
 

More from Ahmar Hashmi

32 Security in_Internet_IP_SEC_SSL/TLS_PGN_VPN_and_Firewalls
32 Security in_Internet_IP_SEC_SSL/TLS_PGN_VPN_and_Firewalls32 Security in_Internet_IP_SEC_SSL/TLS_PGN_VPN_and_Firewalls
32 Security in_Internet_IP_SEC_SSL/TLS_PGN_VPN_and_FirewallsAhmar Hashmi
 
31 Network Security
31 Network Security31 Network Security
31 Network SecurityAhmar Hashmi
 
28 Network Management_SNMP
28 Network Management_SNMP28 Network Management_SNMP
28 Network Management_SNMPAhmar Hashmi
 
26 Remote Logging_Electronic_Mail_and_File_Transfer
26 Remote Logging_Electronic_Mail_and_File_Transfer26 Remote Logging_Electronic_Mail_and_File_Transfer
26 Remote Logging_Electronic_Mail_and_File_TransferAhmar Hashmi
 
24 Congestion Control_and_Quality_of_Service
24 Congestion Control_and_Quality_of_Service24 Congestion Control_and_Quality_of_Service
24 Congestion Control_and_Quality_of_ServiceAhmar Hashmi
 
23 Process to_Process_Delivery_UDP_TCP_and_SCTP
23 Process to_Process_Delivery_UDP_TCP_and_SCTP23 Process to_Process_Delivery_UDP_TCP_and_SCTP
23 Process to_Process_Delivery_UDP_TCP_and_SCTPAhmar Hashmi
 
22 Network Layer_Delivery_forwarding_and_Routing
22 Network Layer_Delivery_forwarding_and_Routing22 Network Layer_Delivery_forwarding_and_Routing
22 Network Layer_Delivery_forwarding_and_RoutingAhmar Hashmi
 
21 Network Layer_Address_Mapping_Error_Reporting_and_Multicasting
21 Network Layer_Address_Mapping_Error_Reporting_and_Multicasting21 Network Layer_Address_Mapping_Error_Reporting_and_Multicasting
21 Network Layer_Address_Mapping_Error_Reporting_and_MulticastingAhmar Hashmi
 
20 Network Layer_Internet_Protocol
20 Network Layer_Internet_Protocol20 Network Layer_Internet_Protocol
20 Network Layer_Internet_ProtocolAhmar Hashmi
 
19 Network Layer_Logical_Addressing
19 Network Layer_Logical_Addressing19 Network Layer_Logical_Addressing
19 Network Layer_Logical_AddressingAhmar Hashmi
 
18 Virtual Circuit_Networks_Frame_Relay_and_ATM
18 Virtual Circuit_Networks_Frame_Relay_and_ATM18 Virtual Circuit_Networks_Frame_Relay_and_ATM
18 Virtual Circuit_Networks_Frame_Relay_and_ATMAhmar Hashmi
 
16 Wireless WANs_Cellular_Telephone_and_Satellite_Networks
16 Wireless WANs_Cellular_Telephone_and_Satellite_Networks16 Wireless WANs_Cellular_Telephone_and_Satellite_Networks
16 Wireless WANs_Cellular_Telephone_and_Satellite_NetworksAhmar Hashmi
 
15 Connecting LANs_Backbone_Networks_and_Virtual_LAN
15 Connecting LANs_Backbone_Networks_and_Virtual_LAN15 Connecting LANs_Backbone_Networks_and_Virtual_LAN
15 Connecting LANs_Backbone_Networks_and_Virtual_LANAhmar Hashmi
 
13 Wired Lans_Ethernet
13 Wired Lans_Ethernet13 Wired Lans_Ethernet
13 Wired Lans_EthernetAhmar Hashmi
 

More from Ahmar Hashmi (20)

32 Security in_Internet_IP_SEC_SSL/TLS_PGN_VPN_and_Firewalls
32 Security in_Internet_IP_SEC_SSL/TLS_PGN_VPN_and_Firewalls32 Security in_Internet_IP_SEC_SSL/TLS_PGN_VPN_and_Firewalls
32 Security in_Internet_IP_SEC_SSL/TLS_PGN_VPN_and_Firewalls
 
31 Network Security
31 Network Security31 Network Security
31 Network Security
 
30 Cryptography
30 Cryptography30 Cryptography
30 Cryptography
 
29 Multimedia
29 Multimedia29 Multimedia
29 Multimedia
 
28 Network Management_SNMP
28 Network Management_SNMP28 Network Management_SNMP
28 Network Management_SNMP
 
27 WWW and_HTTP
27 WWW and_HTTP27 WWW and_HTTP
27 WWW and_HTTP
 
26 Remote Logging_Electronic_Mail_and_File_Transfer
26 Remote Logging_Electronic_Mail_and_File_Transfer26 Remote Logging_Electronic_Mail_and_File_Transfer
26 Remote Logging_Electronic_Mail_and_File_Transfer
 
25 DNS
25 DNS25 DNS
25 DNS
 
24 Congestion Control_and_Quality_of_Service
24 Congestion Control_and_Quality_of_Service24 Congestion Control_and_Quality_of_Service
24 Congestion Control_and_Quality_of_Service
 
23 Process to_Process_Delivery_UDP_TCP_and_SCTP
23 Process to_Process_Delivery_UDP_TCP_and_SCTP23 Process to_Process_Delivery_UDP_TCP_and_SCTP
23 Process to_Process_Delivery_UDP_TCP_and_SCTP
 
22 Network Layer_Delivery_forwarding_and_Routing
22 Network Layer_Delivery_forwarding_and_Routing22 Network Layer_Delivery_forwarding_and_Routing
22 Network Layer_Delivery_forwarding_and_Routing
 
21 Network Layer_Address_Mapping_Error_Reporting_and_Multicasting
21 Network Layer_Address_Mapping_Error_Reporting_and_Multicasting21 Network Layer_Address_Mapping_Error_Reporting_and_Multicasting
21 Network Layer_Address_Mapping_Error_Reporting_and_Multicasting
 
20 Network Layer_Internet_Protocol
20 Network Layer_Internet_Protocol20 Network Layer_Internet_Protocol
20 Network Layer_Internet_Protocol
 
19 Network Layer_Logical_Addressing
19 Network Layer_Logical_Addressing19 Network Layer_Logical_Addressing
19 Network Layer_Logical_Addressing
 
18 Virtual Circuit_Networks_Frame_Relay_and_ATM
18 Virtual Circuit_Networks_Frame_Relay_and_ATM18 Virtual Circuit_Networks_Frame_Relay_and_ATM
18 Virtual Circuit_Networks_Frame_Relay_and_ATM
 
17 SONET/SDH
17 SONET/SDH17 SONET/SDH
17 SONET/SDH
 
16 Wireless WANs_Cellular_Telephone_and_Satellite_Networks
16 Wireless WANs_Cellular_Telephone_and_Satellite_Networks16 Wireless WANs_Cellular_Telephone_and_Satellite_Networks
16 Wireless WANs_Cellular_Telephone_and_Satellite_Networks
 
15 Connecting LANs_Backbone_Networks_and_Virtual_LAN
15 Connecting LANs_Backbone_Networks_and_Virtual_LAN15 Connecting LANs_Backbone_Networks_and_Virtual_LAN
15 Connecting LANs_Backbone_Networks_and_Virtual_LAN
 
14 Wireless LAN
14 Wireless LAN14 Wireless LAN
14 Wireless LAN
 
13 Wired Lans_Ethernet
13 Wired Lans_Ethernet13 Wired Lans_Ethernet
13 Wired Lans_Ethernet
 

Recently uploaded

Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application ) Sakshi Ghasle
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxOH TEIK BIN
 
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxMENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxPoojaSen20
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsanshu789521
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxRoyAbrique
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSDStaff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
 
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxMENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 

Ch8: Deadlocks

  • 1. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.1 Chapter 8: Deadlocks System Model Deadlock Characterization Methods for Handling Deadlocks Deadlock Prevention Deadlock Avoidance Deadlock Detection Recovery from Deadlock Combined Approach to Deadlock Handling
  • 2. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.2 The Deadlock Problem A set of blocked processes each holding a resource and waiting to acquire a resource held by another process in the set. Example System has 2 tape drives. P1 and P2 each hold one tape drive and each needs another one. Example semaphores A and B, initialized to 1 P0 P1 wait (A); wait(B) wait (B); wait(A)
  • 3. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.3 Bridge Crossing Example Traffic only in one direction. Each section of a bridge can be viewed as a resource. If a deadlock occurs, it can be resolved if one car backs up (preempt resources and rollback). Several cars may have to be backed up if a deadlock occurs. Starvation is possible.
  • 4. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.4 System Model Resource types R1, R2, . . ., Rm CPU cycles, memory space, I/O devices Each resource type Ri has Wi instances. Each process utilizes a resource as follows: request use release
  • 5. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.5 Deadlock Characterization Mutual exclusion: only one process at a time can use a resource. Hold and wait: a process holding at least one resource is waiting to acquire additional resources held by other processes. No preemption: a resource can be released only voluntarily by the process holding it, after that process has completed its task. Circular wait: there exists a set {P0, P1, …, P0} of waiting processes such that P0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P1, P1 is waiting for a resource that is held by P2, …, Pn–1 is waiting for a resource that is held by Pn, and P0 is waiting for a resource that is held by P0. Deadlock can arise if four conditions hold simultaneously.
  • 6. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.6 Resource-Allocation Graph V is partitioned into two types: P = {P1, P2, …, Pn}, the set consisting of all the processes in the system. R = {R1, R2, …, Rm}, the set consisting of all resource types in the system. request edge – directed edge P1 → Rj assignment edge – directed edge Rj → Pi A set of vertices V and a set of edges E.
  • 7. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.7 Resource-Allocation Graph (Cont.) Process Resource Type with 4 instances Pi requests instance of Rj Pi is holding an instance of Rj Pi Pi Rj Rj
  • 8. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.8 Example of a Resource Allocation Graph
  • 9. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.9 Resource Allocation Graph With A Deadlock
  • 10. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.10 Resource Allocation Graph With A Cycle But No Deadlock
  • 11. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.11 Basic Facts If graph contains no cycles ⇒ no deadlock. If graph contains a cycle ⇒ if only one instance per resource type, then deadlock. if several instances per resource type, possibility of deadlock.
  • 12. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.12 Methods for Handling Deadlocks Ensure that the system will never enter a deadlock state. Allow the system to enter a deadlock state and then recover. Ignore the problem and pretend that deadlocks never occur in the system; used by most operating systems, including UNIX.
  • 13. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.13 Deadlock Prevention Mutual Exclusion – not required for sharable resources; must hold for nonsharable resources. Hold and Wait – must guarantee that whenever a process requests a resource, it does not hold any other resources. Require process to request and be allocated all its resources before it begins execution, or allow process to request resources only when the process has none. Low resource utilization; starvation possible. Restrain the ways request can be made.
  • 14. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.14 Deadlock Prevention (Cont.) No Preemption – If a process that is holding some resources requests another resource that cannot be immediately allocated to it, then all resources currently being held are released. Preempted resources are added to the list of resources for which the process is waiting. Process will be restarted only when it can regain its old resources, as well as the new ones that it is requesting. Circular Wait – impose a total ordering of all resource types, and require that each process requests resources in an increasing order of enumeration.
  • 15. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.15 Deadlock Avoidance Simplest and most useful model requires that each process declare the maximum number of resources of each type that it may need. The deadlock-avoidance algorithm dynamically examines the resource-allocation state to ensure that there can never be a circular-wait condition. Resource-allocation state is defined by the number of available and allocated resources, and the maximum demands of the processes. Requires that the system has some additional a priori information available.
  • 16. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.16 Safe State When a process requests an available resource, system must decide if immediate allocation leaves the system in a safe state. System is in safe state if there exists a safe sequence of all processes. Sequence <P1, P2, …, Pn> is safe if for each Pi, the resources that Pi can still request can be satisfied by currently available resources + resources held by all the Pj, with j<I. If Pi resource needs are not immediately available, then Pi can wait until all Pj have finished. When Pj is finished, Pi can obtain needed resources, execute, return allocated resources, and terminate. When Pi terminates, Pi+1 can obtain its needed resources, and so on.
  • 17. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.17 Basic Facts If a system is in safe state ⇒ no deadlocks. If a system is in unsafe state ⇒ possibility of deadlock. Avoidance ⇒ ensure that a system will never enter an unsafe state.
  • 18. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.18 Safe, Unsafe , Deadlock State
  • 19. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.19 Resource-Allocation Graph Algorithm Claim edge Pi → Rj indicated that process Pj may request resource Rj; represented by a dashed line. Claim edge converts to request edge when a process requests a resource. When a resource is released by a process, assignment edge reconverts to a claim edge. Resources must be claimed a priori in the system.
  • 20. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.20 Resource-Allocation Graph For Deadlock Avoidance
  • 21. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.21 Unsafe State In Resource-Allocation Graph
  • 22. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.22 Banker’s Algorithm Multiple instances. Each process must a priori claim maximum use. When a process requests a resource it may have to wait. When a process gets all its resources it must return them in a finite amount of time.
  • 23. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.23 Data Structures for the Banker’s Algorithm Available: Vector of length m. If available [j] = k, there are k instances of resource type Rj available. Max: n x m matrix. If Max [i,j] = k, then process Pi may request at most k instances of resource type Rj. Allocation: n x m matrix. If Allocation[i,j] = k then Pi is currently allocated k instances of Rj. Need: n x m matrix. If Need[i,j] = k, then Pi may need k more instances of Rj to complete its task. Need [i,j] = Max[i,j] – Allocation [i,j]. Let n = number of processes, and m = number of resources types.
  • 24. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.24 Safety Algorithm 1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively. Initialize: Work = Available Finish [i] = false for i - 1,3, …, n. 2. Find and i such that both: (a) Finish [i] = false (b) Needi ≤ Work If no such i exists, go to step 4. 3. Work = Work + Allocationi Finish[i] = true go to step 2. 4. If Finish [i] == true for all i, then the system is in a safe state.
  • 25. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.25 Resource-Request Algorithm for Process Pi Request = request vector for process Pi. If Requesti [j] = k then process Pi wants k instances of resource type Rj. 1. If Requesti ≤ Needi go to step 2. Otherwise, raise error condition, since process has exceeded its maximum claim. 2. If Requesti ≤ Available, go to step 3. Otherwise Pi must wait, since resources are not available. 3. Pretend to allocate requested resources to Pi by modifying the state as follows: Available = Available = Requesti; Allocationi = Allocationi + Requesti; Needi = Needi – Requesti;; • If safe ⇒ the resources are allocated to Pi. • If unsafe ⇒ Pi must wait, and the old resource-allocation state is restored
  • 26. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.26 Example of Banker’s Algorithm 5 processes P0 through P4; 3 resource types A (10 instances), B (5instances, and C (7 instances). Snapshot at time T0: Allocation Max Available A B C A B C A B C P0 0 1 0 7 5 3 3 3 2 P1 2 0 0 3 2 2 P2 3 0 2 9 0 2 P3 2 1 1 2 2 2 P4 0 0 2 4 3 3
  • 27. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.27 Example (Cont.) The content of the matrix. Need is defined to be Max – Allocation. Need A B C P0 7 4 3 P1 1 2 2 P2 6 0 0 P3 0 1 1 P4 4 3 1 The system is in a safe state since the sequence < P1, P3, P4, P2, P0> satisfies safety criteria.
  • 28. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.28 Example P1 Request (1,0,2) (Cont.) Check that Request ≤ Available (that is, (1,0,2) ≤ (3,3,2) ⇒ true. Allocation Need Available A B C A B C A B C P0 0 1 0 7 4 3 2 3 0 P1 3 0 2 0 2 0 P2 3 0 1 6 0 0 P3 2 1 1 0 1 1 P4 0 0 2 4 3 1 Executing safety algorithm shows that sequence <P1, P3, P4, P0, P2> satisfies safety requirement. Can request for (3,3,0) by P4 be granted? Can request for (0,2,0) by P0 be granted?
  • 29. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.29 Deadlock Detection Allow system to enter deadlock state Detection algorithm Recovery scheme
  • 30. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.30 Single Instance of Each Resource Type Maintain wait-for graph Nodes are processes. Pi → Pj if Pi is waiting for Pj. Periodically invoke an algorithm that searches for a cycle in the graph. An algorithm to detect a cycle in a graph requires an order of n2 operations, where n is the number of vertices in the graph.
  • 31. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.31 Resource-Allocation Graph and Wait-for Graph Resource-Allocation Graph Corresponding wait-for graph
  • 32. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.32 Several Instances of a Resource Type Available: A vector of length m indicates the number of available resources of each type. Allocation: An n x m matrix defines the number of resources of each type currently allocated to each process. Request: An n x m matrix indicates the current request of each process. If Request [ij] = k, then process Pi is requesting k more instances of resource type. Rj.
  • 33. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.33 Detection Algorithm 1. Let Work and Finish be vectors of length m and n, respectively Initialize: (a) Work = Available (b) For i = 1,2, …, n, if Allocationi ≠ 0, then Finish[i] = false;otherwise, Finish[i] = true. 2. Find an index i such that both: (a) Finish[i] == false (b) Requesti ≤ Work If no such i exists, go to step 4.
  • 34. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.34 Detection Algorithm (Cont.) 3. Work = Work + Allocationi Finish[i] = true go to step 2. 4. If Finish[i] == false, for some i, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then the system is in deadlock state. Moreover, if Finish[i] == false, then Pi is deadlocked. Algorithm requires an order of O(m x n2) operations to detect whether the system is in deadlocked state.
  • 35. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.35 Example of Detection Algorithm Five processes P0 through P4;three resource types A (7 instances), B (2 instances), and C (6 instances). Snapshot at time T0: Allocation Request Available A B C A B C A B C P0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P1 2 0 0 2 0 2 P2 3 0 3 0 0 0 P3 2 1 1 1 0 0 P4 0 0 2 0 0 2 Sequence <P0, P2, P3, P1, P4> will result in Finish[i] = true for all i.
  • 36. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.36 Example (Cont.) P2 requests an additional instance of type C. Request A B C P0 0 0 0 P1 2 0 1 P2 0 0 1 P3 1 0 0 P4 0 0 2 State of system? Can reclaim resources held by process P0, but insufficient resources to fulfill other processes; requests. Deadlock exists, consisting of processes P1, P2, P3, and P4.
  • 37. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.37 Detection-Algorithm Usage When, and how often, to invoke depends on: How often a deadlock is likely to occur? How many processes will need to be rolled back? one for each disjoint cycle If detection algorithm is invoked arbitrarily, there may be many cycles in the resource graph and so we would not be able to tell which of the many deadlocked processes “caused” the deadlock.
  • 38. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.38 Recovery from Deadlock: Process Termination Abort all deadlocked processes. Abort one process at a time until the deadlock cycle is eliminated. In which order should we choose to abort? Priority of the process. How long process has computed, and how much longer to completion. Resources the process has used. Resources process needs to complete. How many processes will need to be terminated. Is process interactive or batch?
  • 39. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.39 Recovery from Deadlock: Resource Preemption Selecting a victim – minimize cost. Rollback – return to some safe state, restart process for that state. Starvation – same process may always be picked as victim, include number of rollback in cost factor.
  • 40. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.40 Combined Approach to Deadlock Handling Combine the three basic approaches prevention avoidance detection allowing the use of the optimal approach for each of resources in the system. Partition resources into hierarchically ordered classes. Use most appropriate technique for handling deadlocks within each class.
  • 41. Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©20028.41 Traffic Deadlock for Exercise 8.4