This rubric outlines the criteria and scoring for evaluating discussion posts in an online course. It addresses several aspects of the post, including responding to the discussion question, depth of critical analysis, use of sources, writing quality, and timeliness. For outstanding performance, the post must thoroughly answer the question with in-depth critical analysis demonstrating knowledge from course readings and cite at least three credible sources. It also must be clearly written with no errors. The rubric provides scoring ranges to evaluate performance as outstanding, excellent, competent, proficient, or room for improvement in each category.
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Rubric to follow outstanding performance excellent performance
1. RUBRIC TO FOLLOW
Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent
Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive
with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg
gained from the course readings for the module and current
credible sources.
44 (44%) - 44 (44%) Outstanding Performance
• Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s)
• Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of
knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and
current credible sources.
• Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) - 43 (43%) Excellent Performance
• Responds to the discusion question(s)
• Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of
knowledg gained from the course readings for the module.
• 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
• Supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Competent Performance
• Responds to most of the discusion question(s)
• Is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis
representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for
the module.
• 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
2. • Supported by at least 3 credible references
31 (31%) - 34 (34%) Proficient Performance
• Responds to some of the discusion question(s)
• One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially
addresed
• Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and
synthesis
• Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course
readings for the module.
• Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Room for Improvement
• Does not respond to the discusion question(s)
• Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
•lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
• Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings
for the module.
• Contains only 1 or no credible references
Main Posting: Writing
6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Outstanding Performance
• Written clearly and concisely
• Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
• Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Excellent Performance
• Written clearly and concisely
• May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
3. • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Competent Performance
• Written concisely
• May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
• Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Proficient Performance
•Writtten somewhat concisely
• May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors
• Contains some APA formatting erros
0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Room for Improvement
• Not written clearly or concisely
• Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors
• Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting: Timely and full participation
10 (10%) - 10 (10%)
• Meets requirements for timely and full participation
• Posts main discussion by due date
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
• Does not meet requirement for full participation
RUBRI
C TO FO
LLOW
4. Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient
Performance
Room for Improvement
Main Pos
ting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with
critical analysis and synthesis
representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for
the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%)
-
44 (44%)
Outstanding Performance
• Thoroughly responds to the discusion que
stion(s)
• Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of
knowledg gained from the course
readings for the module and current credible sources.
• Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
5. 40 (40%)
-
43 (43%)
Excellent Performance
• Responds to the d
iscusion question(s)
• Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of
knowledg gained from the course
readings for the module.
• 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
• Supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%)
-
39 (39%)
Competent Performance
• Responds to m
ost of the discusion question(s)
• Is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis
representive of knowledg gained from the
course readings for the module.
6. • 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
RUBRIC TO FOLLOW
Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent
Performance Proficient
Performance Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive
with critical analysis and synthesis
representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for
the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) - 44 (44%) Outstanding Performance
• Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s)
• Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of
knowledg gained from the course
readings for the module and current credible sources.
• Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) - 43 (43%) Excellent Performance
• Responds to the discusion question(s)
• Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of
knowledg gained from the course
readings for the module.
• 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
• Supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Competent Performance
• Responds to most of the discusion question(s)
• Is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis
representive of knowledg gained from the
7. course readings for the module.
• 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
Question: Post a description of a group therapy session with
older adults, including the stage of the group, any resistances or
issues that were present, and therapeutic techniques used by the
facilitator. Explain any challenges that may occur when working
with this group. Support your recommendations with evidence-
based literature.
LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohos
t.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1021972&site=ed
s-live&scope=site
https://class.content.laureate.net/a43aa6517589a8ba7fdd457ce6
38f051.pdf
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohos
t.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=0002664899000
13&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://class.content.laureate.net/5b455bb96d9ca31f283c4bf444f
7b090.pdf
https://class.content.laureate.net/ab8d1c07b8276e36c03881a1e6
92b478.pdf
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohos
t.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=0003514006000
06&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohos
10. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/waldenu/detail.action?doc
ID=1581170
Question: Post a description of a group therapy session with
older adults, including the stage of the
group, any resistances or issues that were present, and
therapeutic techniques used by the facilitator.
Explain any challenges that may occur when working with this
group. Support your recommendations
with evidence-based literature.
LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohos
t.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nle
bk&AN=1021972&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://class.content.laureate.net/a43aa6517589a8ba7fdd457ce6
38f051.pdf
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohos
t.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eds
wsc&AN=000266489900013&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://class.content.laureate.net/5b455bb96d9ca31f283c4bf444f
7b090.pdf
https://class.content.laureate.net/ab8d1c07b8276e36c03881a1e6
92b478.pdf
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohos
t.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eds
wss&AN=000351400600006&site=eds-live&scope=site
