This presentation, originally created for the 2012 C+W conference for a panel consisting of a series of lightning talks centered on Hacking the Classroom, has been revised for publication.
2. HACKING MY HEAD
virginia kuhn
graduate pedagogy: vkuhn@cinema.usc.edu
three principles
3. HACKING MY HEAD
three principles
virginia kuhn
vkuhn@cinema.usc.edu
1. don’t assume they can recognize
your biases
II. don’t privilege one semiotic
register
III. don’t assume critical
consciousness when it comes to
production
4. HACKING MY HEAD
1. don’t assume they can
recognize your biases
virginia kuhn
vkuhn@cinema.usc.edu
6. HACKING MY HEAD
some basic premises
l. orality > literacy > digital
II. ‘fluency’ = consuming + producing
lll. ethics: pedagogy + epistemology
virginia kuhn
vkuhn@cinema.usc.edu
7. HACKING MY HEAD
IML501: Seminar in Contemporary
Digital Media
I. managing + mobilizing the digital
II. contributing to the public sphere
III. fostering systems thinking
virginia kuhn
vkuhn@cinema.usc.edu
8. my scholarship HACKING MY HEAD
http://scalar.usc.edu/anvc/kuhn/index
International Journal of Learning and Media
virginia kuhn
vkuhn@cinema.usc.edu
9. HACKING MY HEAD
II. don’t privilege writing over
other semiotic registers
virginia kuhn
vkuhn@cinema.usc.edu
20. HACKING MY HEAD
virginia kuhn
vkuhn@cinema.usc.edu
thank you!
Editor's Notes
In thinking about the ways in which the classroom needs to be hacked, I have taken a bit of a turn from critiquing institutional structures: constraints that arise from outmoded disciplinary boundaries, curricular edicts, scholarly biases--it’s not that I don’t have a lot to say about their limitations, b/c I do and have, but when it comes to the level of the classroom, I have a lot of freedom. I’ve designed most of the curriculum and have not had much trouble getting it through. Moreover there is typically far more freedom in graduate classes anyway. Therefore, I turned the critical lens on myself and really reflected upon my own pedagogy, concluding that I need to hack my own head. \n
I realize that any hacking that needs to be done needs to be done in my own head. I need to consider the ways in which I am clinging to an old paradigm about graduate education, much as i have been able to shift re: undergrad, given that i’ve been explicitly doing that for many years. I offer three lessons with attendant examples, of the ways in which i’ve hacked my own head in the service of hacking the classroom. t\n
I realize that any hacking that needs to be done needs to be done in my own head. I need to consider the ways in which I am clinging to an old paradigm about graduate education, much as i have been able to shift re: undergrad, given that i’ve been explicitly doing that for many years. I offer three lessons with attendant examples, of the ways in which i’ve hacked my own head in the service of hacking the classroom. t\n
1. opened class with overview of premises; was quite upfront about what is not on the table (e.g. no paradigm shift, a continuum]\n
In thinking about the ways in which the classroom needs to be hacked, I have taken a bit of a turn from critiquing institutional structures: constraints that arise from outmoded disciplinary boundaries, curricular edicts, scholarly biases--it’s not that I don’t have a lot to say about their limitations, b/c I do and have, but when it comes to the level of the classroom, I have a lot of freedom. I’ve designed most of the curriculum and have not had much trouble getting it through. Moreover there is typically far more freedom in graduate classes anyway. Therefore, I turned the critical lens on myself and really reflected upon my own pedagogy, concluding that I need to hack my own head. \n
In thinking about the ways in which the classroom needs to be hacked, I have taken a bit of a turn from critiquing institutional structures: constraints that arise from outmoded disciplinary boundaries, curricular edicts, scholarly biases--it’s not that I don’t have a lot to say about their limitations, b/c I do and have, but when it comes to the level of the classroom, I have a lot of freedom. I’ve designed most of the curriculum and have not had much trouble getting it through. Moreover there is typically far more freedom in graduate classes anyway. Therefore, I turned the critical lens on myself and really reflected upon my own pedagogy, concluding that I need to hack my own head. \n
but also these, which are more specific to IML501\n
I also assigned my own work which I am typically wont to do. But i didn’t ask them to buy anything and it also lets class know where I stand. \n
I opened with a first day image assignment which I usually view as less academic.\n
image project revisions; you have too many words!!\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
And speaking of remix brings me to my last lesson: don’t assume critical consciousness when it comes to production. We might call this a tribute or homage, but a less generous reading sees it as appropriation. \n
add marlon riggs ethnic notions for in class viewing: also explicit instances of ways of seeing. We might call this a tribute or homage, but a less generous reading sees it as appropriation. \n
add marlon riggs ethnic notions for in class viewing: also explicit instances of ways of seeing. We might call this a tribute or homage, but a less generous reading sees it as appropriation. \n