Supercharge Your Applications

Pop quiz… who’s this? Ian Fleming – creator of James Bond Second question what was James Bonds first car?

It was this (not the Aston Martin DB5 from the 1964 movie ‘Goldfinger’) in the first Bond novel, 'Casino Royale' published in 1953 Fleming put our James in one of these. This is a 4.5 litre supercharged Bentley from the 1920’s. W.O. Bentley famously said when talking about engine performance - "there's no replacement for displacement". One of his engineers said ah ha, I'll show you, and bolted a supercharger on to the engine of the regular 4.5 litre Bentley - the supercharger is the big silver box on the front of this car - forcing more oxygen into the engine allowing more fuel to be burnt and increasing performance. Now that's exactly what I'm going to outline for you in this presentation, how you can bolt on some currently available technology to increase the performance of your applications.

co·her·ence I'm going to start with an overview of the supercharger - Oracle Coherence - what it is and how it works. And then show how it can be used and is being used by our customers to increase performance, reduce costs and improve user experience. What does coherence mean? Well, it’s defined as the state of cohering or sticking together, or the logical and orderly and consistent relation of parts. I like that, logic, order, consistency.

“ If you want a 3 second response time. You’ve got 3 seconds. 1 in the presentation layer, 1 in the mid-tier and 1 in the back end” This quote from the CIO of one of our customers really sums up the problem space that we’re in here. If you want a ‘n’ second response time then you only have ‘n’ seconds to deliver that. There are no silver medals for second place in the response time Olympics.

David Chappell – Enterprise Service Bus

Avoid processing wherever possible What does a scalable architecture need to ensure? And see if you can identify a theme here...

Avoid serialization and deserialization

Avoid sending a large document around

Avoid distributed file schemes

Avoid driving increased traffic to back end systems I like this one a lot... and it's a classic SOA example, and if it's a mainframe there's a monetary cost in terms of haw many MIPS you need to pay for, using the technologies described here you can actually reduce the traffic to the back ends, reduce the MIPS that you're paying for.

Value simplicity. Maximize the amount of work not done Thanks to the Agile Alliance for this one – more details here http://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html

Thanks to http://zapthink.com/ for the Lego block analogy to explain SOA – interoperable, unbreakable, composable, reusable.

We're trying to achieve business agility, business alignment, so that when a line of business comes to IT and says government legislation on superannuation just changed, make our systems change to reflect it. IT can say sure thing rather than suck it's teeth and say, "it's gonna cost ya" like some dodgy plumber.

And then there's this organisational tension that developing between the SOA architects who come up with these pristine blueprints for how the IT world should look within their organisation and then they hand that off…

… to IT operations and say make that run, make it highly available, make it high performance, ensure that it will scale. And today there is too tight a coupling between those two sets of folks - between the people that design the architecture and the people that have to operate it. For example, what does it mean to scale up the order to cash process? That process might consist of 42 different services across 8 machines. How do IT ops go about bringing some scale to that process at the same as managing the end of month financial close and keeping the lights on and fixing the printer on level 6 while resetting my password?

Availability – always open, always on. 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

So thinking about state and state management we have this continuum that runs from completely stateless to fully stateful. and there are a few things that can affect or influence this - one is complexity - the more complex a service the more likely it is that it will need to manage state across multiple requests coming in and out of the service, and the longevity of the service - how long the service needs to run to satisfy a particular business transaction. Service Sophistication, Longevity Complex Stateless Cookies + Servlet Session State passing via XML Payloads Loose Coupling, Tight Coupling Service Complexity Stateful Service State Repository Simple

state aware So that's where we are... where should we be?

predictable linear scalability

Next pop quiz question, who knows what this is? That’s right, Napster. Remember Napster? Well think of Coherence like Napster for your business data - highly available, highly distributed peer to peer clustering protocol.

P B Backup Node Primary Node Put() HashKey/CacheKey Hashmap iFace Here's a picture of how it works. At the core are a set of connected network nodes - software processes, which cooperate together across a network, with the sole purpose of storing and maintaining instance data for individual application objects. An application does a ‘put’, that operation is delegated to the grid and the grid automatically elects a primary storage node and a backup storage node on another machine and it does that in a highly available way. So each of these nodes is on a different physical server, and each knows about each other, they are aware of each other existence, health, availability etc... If the primary owner goes down the grid detects that and selects a new primary and backup pair. And this switching this failover can happen in flight without affecting a transaction because of the self-healing nature of the grid. Application Object Application Object Application Object

Put() HashKey/CacheKey Hashmap iFace P B Backup Node Primary Node X Application Object Application Object Application Object

Backup Node Primary Node Write Behind Queue DB Grid Put() HashKey/CacheKey ESB Mediation P B Service Service Service

Shared web session state across multiple portals

Caching the results of service calls

State management for stateful services

Solution Coherence solution provides caching for the data and no loss of connections to the back-end systems Customers can shop between different brands - Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy and Piperlime without having to check out between sites Problem On-line store shopping cart would lose connections to back-end servers, causing users to re-select the items and add to shopping cart, causing loss of sales and low customer satisfaction Slow on-line store performance Scenario Online retail store High availability of the web site, shopping cart, over 4 distinct brands

Solution Coherence solution provides caching – side-cache - for the multi page sales histories One call to the back end and then 9 calls to the cache to get 10 pages of data. Problem Costly to continue to hit the back end for every ‘next’ page of data Slow on-line performance in the field Un-necessary interaction Scenario Sales application Large volumes of sales data retrieved – multi page histories

Solution Moving event processing into application tier increased capacity to handle peak loads Enabled application developers to modify logic without impacting the database; operational cost savings & increased flexibility Problem Matching engine supporting several thousand matches per second, with intense “hot spots” on specific instruments Revenue tied directly to customer activity. Need for high-throughput, low-latency solution for financial transactions Scenario Expanding their infrastructure to handle increased traffic Looking for an event-driven architecture, treating bids as incoming events, modifying the state of bidding markets, and dispatching matched bids

So this picture is fairly typical - every vendor of a Service Bus could draw out this picture - they all use some sort of Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) to achieve high reliability and quality of service - and I'm using MOM here to cover anything that's JMS based or MQ based or Rendezvous based or implements WS-RM - all those similar techniques of message retries and store and forward to reliably send data from one place to the next... And then it dawned on us, why do I have to send something, when it really doesn't have to go anywhere? Everything is already in the grid. All interested parties can act on it. Why do I have to put it in a big JMS message or a big SOAP message and put it into the bus and send it across the wire just so someone can take it out again - if all you really want to do is share that information reliably? So this is what the new bus looks like. Same as the old but without some MOM implementation at the core. There's just no need when the data is in the grid and everyone can access it. Web Service Consumer WS-A ddr <ReplyTo> Callback Portal BPEL CRM ERP CEP Rules BAM JMS / MOM / WS-RM Core Web Service Provider

Web Service Consumer WS-A ddr <ReplyTo> Callback Portal BPEL CRM ERP CEP Rules BAM Web Service Provider

The XTPP — a new generation of platform middleware meant to enable low-cost, commodity hardware-based XTP — is emerging from the convergence of current enterprise application servers, enterprise service buses, flow management technology and innovative XTP point technologies. Massimo Pezzini, Gartner

dramatic increase in performance and throughput

“ Major, often unexpected, changes will directly affect IT organizations in 2009. The successful CIOs will be those who execute well, expand their influence within the enterprise, and, perhaps, are a little bit lucky.” Stefan Spang, McKinsey

Supercharge Your Applications

More Related Content

Similar to Supercharge Your Applications

More from Sean Boiling

Recently uploaded

Supercharge Your Applications

Editor's Notes