CAADP Biennial Review Process Progress and Next Steps

CAADP Biennial Review Process
Progress and Next Steps
Anselme Vodounhessi & Maurice Lorka N’Guessan,
CAADP BR Advisors

OUTLINE
1. The Success of the BR1 … the success factors
2. The BR Tools … as part of the success factors
3. The Concept of the BR process
4. The BR process
5. The Post- BR 1

1. Success of the BR1… the success factors

n.a /10 and is Not on track
The
country
isrequested
to
participate
in
the
nextround
of2019
Data
collection
exercise
forthe
the
Januay2020
Assem
bly
ofthe
Union.
Algeria scores in implementing the Malabo Declaration on Agriculture transformation in Africa …
2017 Country Scorecard for implementing Malabo Declaration
Country Name
No. Item
T-score
out of 10
Minimum
for 2017
T-progress No. Item
C-score
out of 10
Minimum
for 2017
Commitments Categories (C)
C-Progress
The
country
isrequested
to
participate
in
the
nextround
of2019
Data
collection
exercise
forthe
the
Januay2020
Assem
bly
ofthe
Union.
Data
notavailed
by
the
country.
Algeria
Re-committing
to CAADP
Process
Malabo Commitments Areas (T)
1
2
Enhancing
Investment
3
4
5
6
7
Overall ProgressOverall Country Score n.a Not on track
The 2017 Benchmark is 3.94 which is the miminum overall SCORE for a country to be on track in 2017.
The
country
isrequested
to
participate
in
the
nextround
of2019
Data
collection
exercise
forthe
the
Januay2020
Assem
bly
ofthe
Union.
Data
notavailed
by
the
country.
Ending Hunger
by 2025
Boosting Intra-
African Trade
in Agriculture
Commodities
Halving
Poverty
through
Agriculture by
2025
Enhancing
Resilience to
Climate
Variability
Mutual
Accountability
for Actions and
Results
Re-committing
to CAADP
Process

Member States overall progress for
reporting on Malabo Declaration
1.9
4.0 3.1 4.9 1.7 4.4 3.23.6
Zambia 2017 Benchmark
Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia
3.9
4.8
5.0 5.5 4.1 4.1 3.5 3.4 6.1 n.a
4.8 3.7 0.9
n.a
2.1 4.3 4.4
4.64.7 4.2 2.1
2.4 2.2 n.a 2.8 3.5 1.4 3.2 3.4
4.9 5.6
Benin
3.6 n.a 5.3 2.9 3.1 3.9 3.3
1.5 3.8 4.0 1.5 n.a 4.1 n.a
São Tomé & Príncipe Senegal
Central African Rep.
Equatorial Guinea
Kenya
Chad
Eritrea
Lesotho
Comoros
Ethiopia
Liberia
Congo
Gabon
Libya
Algeria
Burundi
Côte d'Ivoire
Gambia
Madagascar
Mauritius Morocco Mozambique Namibia Niger
Against the 2017 Benchmark of 3.9 out of 10 which is the minimum
score for a country to be on track for implementing the Malabo
Declaration, countries which score (out of 10 ) appears in ''green" are
ON TRACK , and countries which score appears in "red" are NOT ON
TRACK for the 2017 reporting exercise to the Jaunary 2018 AU
Assembly.
n.a
n.a 3.1
Botswana
Cabo Verde
Egypt
Guinea-Bissau
Mauritania
Rep. A. Saharawi
South Africa
Nigeria
Angola
Burkina Faso
DR Congo
Ghana
Malawi
Country overall progress for implementing the Malabo Declaration for Agriculture transformation in Africa
Sudan
Swaziland Tanzania Togo Tunisia Uganda Zimbabwe
Cameroon
Djibouti
Guinea
Mali
Rwanda
South Sudan

AU Member
StatesAUC and
NPCA
Partner Institutions&
Non-states Actors
Regional Economic
Communities (RECs)
Our Success …

Country report submission status
Total Nb.
of
countries
Nb. of country
reports
submitted
Regional
Coverage
Central Africa, CA
(ECCAS, SADC)
9 9 100% -
Easthern Africa, EA
(IGAD, EAC, COMESA)
12 8 67%
Comoros, Eritrea, Somalia, &
South Sudan
Northern Africa, NA
(UMA)
7 4 57% Algeria, Libya, & Saharawi.
Southern Africa, SA
(SADC, COMESA)
12 12 100% -
Western Africa, WA
(ECOWAS)
15 14 93% Guinea-Bissau
Total submission 55 47 85% 8
Regions
(RECs involved)
Country coverge Score
Countries that have not submitted
their reports
Success of RECs…

Reporting process
How did countries reported to the
Assembly?
RECs, NPCA/AUC and Member States Coordination Mechanism in 7 steps for
preparing the Biennial Report on Malabo Declaration to the African Union
Summit.
… C
i
C
i
C
i
… C
i
C
i
C
i
… C
i
C
i
C
i
… C
i
C
i
C
i
… C
i
C
i
C
i
Countries individual
Report Preparation.1
Involve all RECs in
the sub-region.
IGAD & EAC
Technical Political
Eastern Africa
RTO RPO
Involve all RECs in
the sub-region.
ECCAS
Technical Political
Central Africa
RTO RPO
Involve all RECs in
the sub-region.
UMA
Technical Political
Northern Africa
RTO RPO
Involve all RECs in
the sub-region.
ECOWAS
Technical Political
Western Africa
RTO RPO
Involve all RECs in
the sub-region.
SADC, COMESA
Technical Political
Southern Africa
RTO RPO
Technical
alignment and
political
endorsement of
countries reports
at sub-regional
levels: Under a
sub-regional
workshops
organized by
RECs.
2
AUC/NPCA CAADP
Team
Submission of
regional Reports,
after integration of
comments, with
Country reports in
Annex.
3
Continental report
compilation.
4
PRC
EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
AFRICAN UNION SUMMIT
Continental
Report to the
AU Summit
through the
AU validation
mechanism
7
AUC
Official Submission to the AUC.6
TA
DREA STC
Continental Report
endorsement by
Ministers, to allow
submission to the
AU Summit.
5
bSCbTF

2. The BR Tools … as part of the success factors

- Target Year for process indicator = 2018 -Reporting Year = 2017 -Baseline Year = 2015 Ʈi.j = Malabo's 2025 Target for the
- Target Year for result indicator = 2025 with data updated for 2016 2016Mi.j = 2016 Milestone for the
No. Country
1 Algeria
2 Angola
3 Benin
4 Botswana
5 Burundi
6 Burkina Faso
7 Cameroon 33.00% 31.70% 15.00% 14.80% 6.00% 5.20% 10.37% 10.13%
19.13% 0.43 Not on track 3.3328.18% 1.44 On track 21.20% 2.11 On track 9.86% 5.19 On track
27.30% 19.20% 7.60% 20.03% 16.
30.20% 27.30% 23.00% 19.20% 10.40% 7.60% 20.70% 20.03% 3.60%
32.63% 0.00 Not on track 1.5445.64% 0.00 Not on track 23.54% 0.00 Not on track 5.36% 10.00 On track
56.00% 29.00% 5.00% 39.20% 7.7
49.60% 56.00% 25.60% 29.00% 5.40% 5.00% 35.70% 39.20% 57.00%
22.40% 9.10% 3.60% ? 0.0
22.40% 9.10% 3.60%
34.00% 18.00% 4.50% 7.50% 0.0
34.00% 34.00% 18.00% 18.00% 4.50% 4.50% 7.50% 7.50% 25.70%
37.60% 19.00% 4.90% 14.20% 0.0
37.60% 37.60% 19.00% 19.00% 4.90% 4.90% 14.00% 14.20%
ƮMD
Excel Databank for compiling Country progress reports on implemen
Progress on Ending
Hunger
(Nutrition)
W0 = W2015 MDDW2015W= W2016
W
Ʈ3.5iii = 2016 M3.5iii = 2016 B3.5iii =
I-score3.5vC3.5ii -progress2016 rM3.5i = I-score3.5i C3.5i -progress
10.00% #DIV/0!
? #DI
10%
Ʈ3.5i = 2016 M3.5ii = 2016 B3.5ii =
2016 rM3.5ii = 2016 rM3.5iii = I-score3.5iii C 3.5iii -progress
50.0% 55.0% relative milestone 1.00 5.0%
0.00 Not on track
Uw0 = Uw2015 Uw = Uw2016
Uw
Ʈ3.5ii =
relative milestone 1.00
5.00% 5.00% 0.00 Not on track
?
0.00 Not on track
?
5.00% 0.00 Not on track
Ʈ3.5v = 2016 M
St0 = St2015 St = St2016
St
2016 M3.5i = 2016 B 3.5i =
?
5.0% relative milestone 1.00
I-score3.5ii
U0 = U2015 U= U2016
U
Ʈ3.5iv = 2016 M3.5iv = 2016 B3.5iv =
C3.5iv -progress
relative milestone 1.00
2016 rM3.5iv = I-score3.5iv

3. Concept of the BR process …

Current performance
Time
Performance
Source: Coopers & Lybrand
Gap
1. Identify and
calibrate gap
2. Set strategy
and learn new approaches
3. Measure success
in closing the gap
4. Maintain the stimulation for
continuous improvement
“Best- in-class” performance
Benchmarking and BR Process
PS; P2P; … Reg.

4. The BR Process …. as endorsed by MS
How do we synchronize the CAADP events to
make sure that they are fed by the BR products?

Intermediate year YB+1
Q.01
Q.02
Q.03
Q.04
Q.05
Q.06
Q.07
Q.08
Biennial year YBAU
Assembly
STC
P -to -P
RECs/Reg.
Meetings
Biennial year YB+2AU
Assembly
Peer-to-Peer Experiences on the BR
MS @ WORK for preparing the Next
Report
RECs-led Regional validations of the
Country Reports
AU Process for submitting Report
Recommendations of the Final Report and
Endorsement of the Report
Platform to operationnalize
recommendations/decisions, and to
discuss, and agree on supports to
Countries
PS
CAADP
PP
Platform to mobilize stakeholders/
partners to launch agreed supports…
CAADP t.
PPs
Recommendations & AU Decisions
bTFbSC
TN
POLITICAL MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILTY
STRATEGIC MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILTY
TECHNICAL MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILTY
STAKEHOLDERS’ MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILTY
MARKETING SUPPORTS to MS & RECs

Intermediate year YB+1
Q.01
Q.02
Q.03
Q.04
Q.05
Q.06
Q.07
Q.08
Biennial year YBAU
Assembly
M&E
PR
Biennial year YB+2AU
Assembly
Peer-to-Peer Experiences on the BR
MS @ WORK for preparing the Next
Report
RECs-led Regional validations of the
Country Reports
AU Process for submitting Report
Recommendations of the Final Report and
Endorsement of the Report
Platform to operationnalize
recommendations/ decisions & to discuss,
and agree on supports to Countries
Platform to mobilize stakeholders/
partners to launch agreed supports…
Recommendations & AU Decisions

5. The BR Roadmap & the Post BR1 …

Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04
2017
Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08
2018
Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12
2019
Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16
2020
The BR
mechanism is
established and
has delivered on
the Inaugural
Biennial Report
to the January
2018 AU
Assembly.
1.1
Accountability
platforms are
established and
institutionalized
to make best use
of the BR
exercise for
responsive
actions.
1.2
Process for the
2019 BR Report
to the January
2020 Assembly.
1.3
Strengthening M&E Systems @
Country, for the e-Biennial
2.1
Strengthening
M&E Systems @
RECs, AUC levels
2.2
Responsive programmes-activities emerging from the AU
Decisions on the BR are designed and implemented
1.4
Done
Pathway of the AU-led
Biennial Review

Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04
2017
Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08
2018
Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12
2019
Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16
2020
The BR
mechanism is
established and
has delivered on
the Inaugural
Biennial Report
to the January
2018 AU
Assembly.
1.1
Accountability
platforms are
established and
institutionalized
to make best use
of the BR
exercise for
responsive
actions.
1.2
1.4
Done
Biennial Review

AU Member
StatesAUC and
NPCA
Non-states Actors &
Partner InstitutionsRegional Economic
Communities (RECs)
→ Ad hoc engagement
→ Not structured in terms of timing
→ Not formalized
Institutionalization …

AU Member
StatesAUC and
NPCA
Non-states Actors &
Partner InstitutionsRegional Economic
Communities (RECs)
HoS
PS
P-to-P
bSC
How to further formalize for better planning ?
CAADP-PP
bTF

Who are we ?
What to discuss?
When do we meet?
Where does it fit ?
Link outcomes to AU policy organs meetings … synchronized
HoS
PS
P-to-P
bSC
CAADP-PP
bTF

Platforms to be institutionalized…
4 Platform in the Year 2018:
1. PS Platform
2. BR Task Force Platform
3. BR Steering Committee
Platform
4. Peer-to-peer experimental
learning platform

BR Task Force successfully institutionalized

On the way for improved BR
bTF
P-to-P
Technical Review Logic before the
next BR exercise
Review of BR
Tools
1st Feedback
2nd Feedback
Next round
… October 2018
Peer-to-Peer
Experimental Learning
Conference (P-to-P)
for National CAADP
M&E Focal Persons,
being planned for 9-
11 October 2018 in
Tunisia,
Critical Analysis
2-Years Planning
Regional Trainings for all
Member States on the
Updated BR Tools for 2019
round planned for
Nov – Dec 2018

Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04
2017
Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08
2018
Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12
2019
Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16
2020
The BR
mechanism is
established and
has delivered on
the Inaugural
Biennial Report
to the January
2018 AU
Assembly.
1.1
Accountability
platforms are
established and
institutionalized
to make best use
of the BR
exercise for
responsive
actions.
1.2
Process for the
2019 BR Report
to the January
2020 Assembly.
1.3
Strengthening M&E Systems @
Country, for the e-Biennial
2.1
1.4
Done
Biennial Review

By End November 2018
By End April 2019
The temporally e-BR… in collaboration with IFPRI
Regional Trainings for all
Member States on the
Updated BR Tools for 2019
round planned for
Nov – Dec 2018

Ci Ci Ci
…
C.A.REC
Reg I
Reg I
Ci
E.A.REC
Ci Ci
…
Reg I
Reg I
Ci
N.A.REC
Ci Ci
…
Reg I
Reg I
Ci
S.A.REC
Ci Ci
…
Reg I
Reg I
Ci
W.A.REC
Ci Ci
…
Reg I
Reg I
Continental
DATABASEAUC
The e-Biennial Review

Bill
Asante !
Merci !
Thanks !Obrigado!
Shukran !

CAADP Biennial Review Process Progress and Next Steps

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to CAADP Biennial Review Process Progress and Next Steps

Similar to CAADP Biennial Review Process Progress and Next Steps (20)

More from African Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)

More from African Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

CAADP Biennial Review Process Progress and Next Steps