3. “There is a cognitive basis for prejudice in
lack of knowledge, poor reasoning, skills and
shallow commitment to basic democratic
norms and values.”
4. No teaching of the subject, but the discussion
of social issues related to unit in the subjects:
History
Geography
Civics
Languages
I.T.
Sciences
5. GENERAL PROBLEM AREAS
• Racial and ethnic conflict
• Religious and ideological conflict
• Security of the individual
• Conflict among economic groups
• Health, education and welfare
• Security of the nation
6. I. OBJECTIVES/EFFECTS
A. Instructional (Direct)
- Framework for analyzing social issues
- Ability to assure roles of the other
- Competence in social dialogue
B. Nurturant (Indirect)
- Empathy/Pluralism
- Facts about social problems
- Capacity for social involvement &
desire for social action
10. 3. TAKING A POSITION
Procedure (discuss)
Divide the class in two sides as statements
for discussion: guide how to discuss
11. 4. EXPLORING THE STANCE
UNDERLYING THE POSITION TAKEN
Yes/No: Argue: write points on the
board
12. 5. REFINING AND QUALIFYING THE
POSITION
Both sides will critic the
arguments thrown by the other
side
13. 6. TESTING ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT
FACTS, DEFINITIONS, AND
CONSEQUENCES.
Teacher will discuss on styles of thinking,
logic, prejudices, socioeconomic statuses.
Guides students how to make judgment by
360 degrees of thinking.
14. III. SOCIAL SYSTEM
Teacher initiating and controlling the
discussion
Atmosphere will be open, equal, &
intellectual
15. IV. PRINCIPLE OF REACTION
All views will be respected.
Probe the substance of students’
thinking.
Use questions, dialogues, and
contradictions.
16. V. SUPPORT SYSTEM
Source documents
Set-up should be suitable for
discussions
Paper-pencils are necessary to note
the points
17. REFRENCES
Models of Teaching by Marsha Weil &
Bruce Joyce
http://hagar.up.ac.za/catts/learner/c
ooplrn/b3.html#Jurisprudential%20inqu
iry