• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
What should we want from GCSEs & A levels?
 

What should we want from GCSEs & A levels?

on

  • 984 views

Tim Oates, Group Director of Assessment Research and Development for Cambridge Assessment

Tim Oates, Group Director of Assessment Research and Development for Cambridge Assessment

Statistics

Views

Total Views
984
Views on SlideShare
740
Embed Views
244

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
16
Comments
0

5 Embeds 244

http://www.ofqual.gov.uk 212
http://www2.ofqual.gov.uk 17
http://staging.ofqual.gov.uk 12
http://ofqual.gov.uk 2
http://ia201114.eu.archive.org 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    What should we want from GCSEs & A levels? What should we want from GCSEs & A levels? Presentation Transcript

    • A new look at standards: What should we want from GCSEs and A levels? Presentation by Tim Oates Group Director Assessment Research and Development (ARD) 13 October 2011
    • Complex systems
      • Our partial data refer to epiphenomena; we need to apprehend deep structures and concealed trends
      • We need to understand examinations in the context of ‘curriculum coherence’
      • Careful thinking or split thinking? We need to understand the limits of our sphere of action (modesty and self-control) but simultaneously the extent of impact and dependencies (sophistication in understanding and in strategic planning)
    • Exam system has grown into a monster
      • ‘…” the volume of assessment has left awarding bodies overstretched, resulting in errors in questions, high dissatisfaction with marking and inconsistency in grades”…’
      • ‘…” the volume of assessment over the final three years of secondary school … requires, if it is to be conducted as well as it possibly can be, a far greater application of resource”…’
      • ‘… the OCR exam board awarded an A* to 19 per cent of HMC pupils for Physics, while for Edexcel the figure was almost 25 per cent. For Economics, AQA awarded and A* to 16 per cent of HMC candidates but for OCR the figure was 11 per cent…’.
      • Important locus of control issues embedded in this statement
      • Important implied and explicit models regarding standards
      Times 07 Sept 2011 Kenneth Durham University College School Hampstead/HMC
    • The Cambridge Standards Debate
      • Have we moved on?
    • Why the debate?
      • The existence of mechanisms for possible subtle grade drift
      • Evidence from diverse sources – enough to stimulate anxiety
    • Promoting clarity
      • standards of demand
      • content standards
      • standards of attainment
      • standards over time
      • standards between specifications
      • standards between subjects
      • standards between types of qualifications
      • teaching standards and standards of education
    • Mechanisms
      • A period of constant change in structure and content
      • Removal of bias, enhancement of accessibility and transparency of assessments
      • Benefit of the doubt
      • Increased support via mark schemes, text books
      • Emphasis on inclusion
      • Focus on attainment – solely on ‘exam performance’
      • Modularisation and complex routes
      • Changing cohorts, subject choice
      • Massive investment in education
    • Where to, from here?
      • We should understand, with precision, the impact of efforts to improve standards of attainment
      • Reduce the frequency and scope of change in qualifications
      • Qualifications should be owned through partnership between schools, Higher Education, employers and awarding bodies
      • Fitness for purpose, clarity of purpose and validity – pre-eminent concerns for determining standards
    • The purposes and functions of qualifications
      • Documenting outcomes of learning
      • Supporting specific, valid inference(s) regarding the candidates’ possession of specific knowledge, skills and/or understanding
      • Signalling
      • Valuation of different aspects of knowledge, skills and understanding
      • Discrimination and selection
      • Controlling flows into specific occupations and regulating the labour market
      • Empowering citizens
      • Realigning the control of professions
      • Measuring the level of skills and knowledge in the national, sectoral system
      • Measuring the performance of the education system
      • Ensuring linkage of content of programmes (training) to work
      • Recognising the actual knowledge, skills and competences required in performance
      • Fill gaps and update requirements in knowledge, skills and competences
      • Guaranteeing the quality of provision for learners
      • Guaranteeing the quality of provision for funding agencies
      • Affecting the identity of learners
      • Effecting social integration
      • Conferring status on qualified individuals
      • Processes of recognition, accreditation and ‘valuation’ of prior learning
      • Managing competences within enterprises
      • Offering inclusion
      • Providing orientation, guidance
      • Controlling the education and training system generally and the qualifications system specifically
      • Enacting reform in education and training
      • Influencing the content of learning programmes
      • Conditioning or shaping pedagogy
      • Conditioning or shaping assessment
      • Developing zones of mutual trust (between users of qualifications)
      • Providing an accountability mechanism
      • Invoking specific models of competence
      • Giving status to institutional/provider offering
      • Shifting control from one agency to another
      • Shifting control for assessment in the system
      • Protecting the content, standing and identity of a profession
      • Providing feedback to learners (formative and diagnostic function)
      • Helping teachers and trainers understand the strengths and weaknesses of their provision (evaluative function)
      • Introducing innovation
      • Protecting consumers
      • Delivering public benefits
      • Meeting international licensing requirements
    • A thousand tiny steps…
      • Access, defensibility, and efficiency
      • (drift in item forms)
      • Standards maintenance – the magnitude of ‘movement’
      • (drift in attainment standards)
      • Content standards/validity
      • (drift in validity, currency, credibility and learning progression)
    • The interaction of public understanding and policy
      • The shock and horror of ‘error’
      • ‘ Measurement accuracy’ – monitoring it, reducing it
      • Dylan Wiliam: ‘….80 hour exams should do it…’
      • How long would you like assessment to be, what do you want them to look like, what do you want them to cost?
      • Instruction-sensitive assessment
    • A/AS level examinations Bassett, D. 2011. Inside Government Forum. Reform of National Exams: Impact on schools and students . 7 July. One Great George Street, Westminster. Briefing notes, BN43 (2009), IFS Candidates Entries Papers Cost (includes correction for inflation) Expenditure on education in England 1970 103,000 (£89.32) 441,898 (£20.82) 643,750 (£14.29) £9.2m £28bn 1990 185,000 (£102.16) 615,725 (£30.70) 1,388,250 (£13.61) £18.9m £45bn 2000 231,351 (£131.83) 672,518 (£45.35) 2,168,916 (£14.06) £30.5m £52bn 2008 256,622 (£275.50) 741,356 (£95.37) 5,455,655 (£12.96) £70.7m £80bn
    • The race to the bottom
      • What is worse?
      • for it to be present but not detect it; the ‘total ignorance ’ option
      • for the public to think that it occurs but it does not (and we cannot demonstrate that it does not); the ‘ innocent imprisoned ’ option
      • to have it, to not be committed to quantifying it, nor to having policy to arrest it; the ‘ defiantly irresponsible ’ option
      • A key claim regarding regulation is removal and/or prevention of competition on standards
    • A new look at standards: What should we want from GCSEs and A levels? Presentation by Tim Oates Group Director Assessment Research and Development (ARD) 13 October 2011