• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Thesis presentation

Thesis presentation



The presentation I gave as part of my defense of my Master of Science

The presentation I gave as part of my defense of my Master of Science



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 3

http://www.linkedin.com 3



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Apple Keynote

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Thesis presentation Thesis presentation Presentation Transcript

  • To the Screens Themselves! A Phenomenological Approach to Understanding Interactive Screens
  • Table of Contents  What Are Screens?  Why Research the Interactive Screen?  How Can we Research Interactive Screens?  Phenomenology on Interactive Screens  Case Studies  Interactive Screens on Phenomenology  Conclusions  Questions?
  • What Are Screens? “The existence of another virtual space, another three-dimensional world enclosed by a frame and situated inside our normal space. The frame separates two absolutely different spaces that somehow coexist.“ - Lev Manovich, An Archeology of the Computer Screen -  A novel trichotomy based on the physical possibilities of screens:  Static Screens  Dynamic Screens  Interactive Screens
  • The Static Screen
  • The Dynamic Screen
  • The Interactive Screen
  • Why Research Interactive Screens? “The familiar is that to which we are accustomed; and that to which we are accustomed is hardest to ‘know’, that is to see as a problem, that is to see as strange, as distant, as ‘outside us’ ...” Nietzsche 1974, no.355, p.301  This is not a presentation.  Screens are ubiquitous  Interactive screens have taken flight in recent years
  • How Can we Research Interactive Screens?  Screens are embedded  Screens undergo rapid development  Experience of screens: Phenomenology “Phenomenology studies the structure of the conscious directed mind from a first person perspective“  Used methodologies:  Lucas Introna and Fernando Ilharco  Don Ihde  Medical Anthropology (Mol, Radstake, van Dijck)
  • Phenomenology on Interactive Screens (1/3)  The traditional approach (Introna & Ilharco) did not research interactive screens  Evade experience  Attract attention  Display relevance  Interactive Screens: Imply immersion  The essence of screens is ‘already agreement’  Screens are shaping cultural surroundings  Interactive screens can produces virtual worlds  Problematic in existential phenomenology
  • Phenomenology on Interactive Screens (2/3)  A framework of ‘I - technology - World’ relations (Don Ihde).  Results of the application of the trichotomy of screen to postphenomenology:
  • Phenomenology on Interactive Screens (3/3)  Traditional phenomenology shows us  how screens are experienced in a larger cultural perspective  but fail to explain virtual worlds  Postphenomenology shows us:  that interactive screens change perception  screens are developing towards complete immersion
  • Case Studies  Screens in the Public Space  Car Navigation Device GPS Leads Driver to Cliff's Edge  Screens in Medical Practice The phrase "You have  Sonograph reached your final destination" almost took on a whole new meaning for one British driver on Sunday when the soothing robot voice of his car's GPS became a siren's call luring him toward his doom. Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ article-1164705/BMW-left-teetering-100ft-cliff-edge- sat-nav-directs-driver-steep-footpath.html
  • Interactive Screens on Phenomenology  The research of interactive screens encounters the boundaries of existential phenomenology.  A new understanding of essentialistic thinking within postphenomenology is described.  Phenomenology fails to account for larger cultural influences on technology.
  • Conclusions  A better applicable trichotomy of screens  A unique understanding of interactive screens  what they are  how they act  Contemporary Phenomenology  can produce notions of essence of technologies  has problems describing virtual worlds  needs to rely on empirical philosophy
  • Questions?
  • To the Drinks themselves! A Dutch Approach to Understanding Celebration of Graduation Café Het Bolwerk