Christian Walzer
POLICY SEMINAR
Virtual Event - COVID-19: The role of the agriculture-ecosystem health interface
AUG 18, 2020 - 09:30 AM TO 11:00 AM EDT
(TARA) Call Girls Chakan ( 7001035870 ) HI-Fi Pune Escorts Service
Pathogen Spillover and Interfaces in the Anthropocene
1. Pathogen Spillover and
Interfaces in the Anthropocene
Chris Walzer
Wildlife Conservation Society
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
2. What do we know?
Zoonoses are diseases the
move between animals and
humans
Emerging Infectious Diseases
[EID] are dominated by
zoonoses
72% of all zoonotic EIDs
originate in wildlife
EID frequency is increasing
HIV, Ebola, H1N1, SARS, Nipah,
Hendra, H7N9
3. 1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
10,000,000
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Nbdeaths(logarithmicscale)
Years
Spanish flu 1918
H1N1 influenza
50 millions deaths
50 0000 0000
Asian flu 1957
H2N2 influenza
100,000 deaths
Hong Kong flu 1968
H3N2 influenza
700,000 deaths
Ebola virus 1976
1,550 deaths
AIDS 1981
HIV
30 millions deaths
Hendra virus 1994
4 deaths
H9N2, H7N7 influenza 1999
1 death
SARS-CoV 2002
770 deaths
H5N1 influenza 1997
371 deaths
Nipah virus 1999
250 deaths
Covid-19 2019
SARS-Cov-2
> 250,000 deaths
Ebola virus 2014
11,000 deaths
H7N9 influenza 2013
44 deaths
MERS coronavirus
2012, 54 deaths
Zika virus 2016
West Nile virus USA
1999, 2,000 deaths
A flu 2009
H1N1 influenza
15,000 deaths
From Lowenthal et al 2015. Emerging viral diseases
4. SARS-CoV-2 Spillover: What is known?
Zoonotic pandemic – broad
consensus
Ancestral host is a horseshoe bat
species
The time, place, mechanism of the
spillover event is unclear
Positive environmental samples
from market [31/33+ Western part| only 4 could
be sequenced identical to HU-1]
Information lacking
?
??
?
6. Barriers to spillover. This figure was adapted from Plowright et al. 2017
Link s betw een ecological integrity, emerging
infectious diseases originating from w ildlife, and
other aspects of human health - an overview of
the literature
Tom Evans, Sarah Olson, JamesWatson, Kim Gruetzmacher, Mathieu Pruvot, Stacy Jupiter,
StephanieWang, Tom Clementsand KatieJung
April 2020
7. What do we know?
Across 25 high-risk viral families, there
are estimated to be 1.7M unknown
viruses
About 700k of which likely have the
potential to infect humans
For example, for every known
coronavirus, there are thousands of
unknown coronaviruses circulating in
wildlife
Carroll et al. (2018) Science
8.
9. Wildlife surveys
in markets
Distribution chain
Consumer/vendor
demography and
behaviour
Consumer/vendor
demography and
behaviour
Sampling/testing
bushmeat
Direct behavioral
observations
Sero-conversion
study in vendors
Coordinated One Health Approach
Pruvot et al. 2019 Sci. Tot. Env
10. What do we know?
Huong et al. (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.05.0985
90 (PLoS One in press)
11. Conservation, Health and Society
• COVID-19 is a symptom of ailing
planetary health
• Starkly reminded us of the basic fact:
Human, animal, plant, and
environmental health and well-being
are all intrinsically connected
• Potential to value and catalyze modes
of stewardship for “intact” healthy
and resilient nature
12. What do we need to do now?
Permanently ban the commercial
trade in wildlife for consumption
Strengthen efforts to combat
trafficking of wild animals within
countries and across borders
Work to change dangerous wildlife
consumption behaviors, especially in
cities
13. Thank you for your attention
VISIT: wcs.org/coronavirus
oneworldonehealth.wcs.org
cwalzer@wcs.org
Editor's Notes
Good morning from the Bronx, hope you are all well, staying healthy, safe and sane!
Thanks very much for the invitation
Before I start I really want to thank the entire AAZV organisation team who have put in countless hours to pull this together.
The recording will be available after 24 hours for 1 month
Similarly the resources linked the talks will be available on the webpage
7th Edition of the EAZVW COVID factsheet will be available next week
There will be a few polls during the talks and it would be great if you provide feedback - Thanks
And with that let us start....
Globally, more than 335 Emerging Infectious Disease (EID) outbreaks, involving 183 distinct pathogens, were reported between 1940-2004. That’s more than 50 outbreaks per decade, and the rate is increasing. More than half (52%) of all EID events in recent years originated in wildlife (2). Among emerging zoonoses specifically, 72% of outbreaks have originated in wildlife with the rest emerging from domestic animals
In his sweeping thesis Against the Grain, James A. Scott demonstrates that population growth nearly froze in the 5,000 years following the widespread adoption of the agricultural lifestyle, with a global population of four million people in 10,000 BCE rising to only five million by 5,000 BCE. That period, Scott argues, produced some of the highest mortality rates our species has ever experienced as the frequency of epidemics skyrocketed.
Emerging zoonoses have significant implications for both public health and economic stability with the costs of many individual recent major outbreaks such as SARS, MERS and Ebola estimated in the tens of billions of US dollars. These costs exceed 1-2% of GDP in less wealthy countries and surpass the International Monetary Fund’s threshold (0.5% GDP loss) for major economic disasters (3). When all is tallied, it is certain that the economic devastation caused by COVID-19 will be orders of magnitude greater: in the trillions to tens of trillions of US dollars.
THESE EDGES ARE THE FRONTLINES OF THE NEXT SPILLOVER – WCS ALREADY HAS BOOTS ON THE GROUND IN SOME 60 COUNTRIES AND WE NOW NEED TO ALSO USE THE EYES ON THE GROUND TO INTEGRATE THIS VALUABLE RESSOURCE INTO THE GLOBAL PUBLIC HEAKTH CONTEXT
The spillover of a pathogen from animals requires a series of stages:
reservoir host being at sufficient density to retain the pathogen
the pathogen release
human exposure to the pathogen
and the pathogen overcoming structural barriers, innate immune responses and molecular compatibility
Of these 700k high-risk viruses, we only understand <0.1%;
Wildlife trading sites, as in the Wuhan market, are vast, industrialized centers, cramming thousands of live animals from hundreds of species alongside thousands of domestic animals. This contrasts starkly with small stalls where local communities exchange and sell wildlife for subsistence. Furthermore, not only do animals exchange viruses among themselves, but vendors and customers also circulate within this milieu while slaughter and purchasing practices continually generate potential spillover opportunities. The commercial live wildlife trade and wildlife markets constitute true caldrons of contagion.
While robust data is lacking, the legal and illegal trade in wildlife is valued at hundreds of billions in US dollars (8). Wildlife trade is driving species extinctions and is a critical factor in global biodiversity loss (9). The illegal trade in wildlife is the fourth most profitable crime after drugs, human trafficking, and arms and generates at least USD 23 billion in illicit annual revenue (10). Data on the value of the global commercial wildlife trade for consumption is sparse, but the global total annual value of wildlife harvesting is estimated at USD 400 billion (11)
These activities induce stress, injury, sickness, and compromise immune systems. The multiple stressors inhibit animal immune responses and allow for enhanced shedding of pathogens (16). Stress also leads to increased excretion of saliva and voiding of urine and feces, all of which facilitate the shedding of viruses. Genetic change in viruses is driven by several mechanisms, amongst them recombination, which occurs when two or more viral genomes co-infect the same host cell and can exchange genetic segments (17). This trade, particularly in live animals, creates super-interfaces along the food value chain co-mingling species from many different geographies and habitats (that would never have otherwise come into contact).
Wildlife trading sites, as in the Wuhan market, are vast, industrialized centers, cramming thousands of live animals from hundreds of species alongside thousands of domestic animals. This contrasts starkly with small stalls where local communities exchange and sell wildlife for subsistence. Furthermore, not only do animals exchange viruses among themselves, but vendors and customers also circulate within this milieu while slaughter and purchasing practices continually generate potential spillover opportunities. The commercial live wildlife trade and wildlife markets constitute true caldrons of contagion.
While robust data is lacking, the legal and illegal trade in wildlife is valued at hundreds of billions in US dollars (8). Wildlife trade is driving species extinctions and is a critical factor in global biodiversity loss (9). The illegal trade in wildlife is the fourth most profitable crime after drugs, human trafficking, and arms and generates at least USD 23 billion in illicit annual revenue (10). Data on the value of the global commercial wildlife trade for consumption is sparse, but the global total annual value of wildlife harvesting is estimated at USD 400 billion (11)
These activities induce stress, injury, sickness, and compromise immune systems. The multiple stressors inhibit animal immune responses and allow for enhanced shedding of pathogens (16). Stress also leads to increased excretion of saliva and voiding of urine and feces, all of which facilitate the shedding of viruses. Genetic change in viruses is driven by several mechanisms, amongst them recombination, which occurs when two or more viral genomes co-infect the same host cell and can exchange genetic segments (17). This trade, particularly in live animals, creates super-interfaces along the food value chain co-mingling species from many different geographies and habitats (that would never have otherwise come into contact).
This trade, particularly in live animals, creates super-interfaces along the food value chain co-mingling species from many different geographies and habitats (that would never have otherwise come into contact). A recent study from Vietnam demonstrated that the odds of coronavirus RNA detection among field rats (Rattus sp. and Bandicota sp.) destined for consumption increased significantly along the supply chain from traders to markets to restaurants