SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 17
Welcome to the ICARB

Accounting for carbon in landuse
            workshop

    forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Purpose

• Bring together interested parties
• Consider what tools we’ve got
• See if there’s anything missing
• Consider if we can improve what we’ve got
• See what work there is to do & think about
  where we go from here
• Consider how ICARB can help




      forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
More integration?

Woodland Expansion Advisory Group

Report to Cabinet Secretary Richard Lochhead

Recommendation 16: Carbon calculator. Forestry
  Commission Scotland should produce a simple to
  use ‘carbon ready-reckoner’ which allows land
  managers to identify whether –and by how much –
  woodland creation could help to reduce their land
  management carbon footprint.

SG response states: To be completed by June 2013.


         forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
ICARB C acct landuse :Agenda
Woodlands
• Woodland Carbon Code/Wdld Creation              Vicky West, FC
• CSORT/CARBINE – Woodland Management           Paul Henshall, FR
Agriculture
• SAC Farm Tool                           Julian Bell,
  SAC/SRUC
• The Cool Farm Tool                   John Hillier, Aberdeen
  Uni
Peatlands
• Peatland Restoration Tool                   Rebekka Artz, JHI
• Peat Carbon Code / Peatland Restoration     Clifton Bain, IUCN
Models vs Measurement
• GHG emissions from measurements and modelling
                                           Bob Rees,
  SAC/SRUC
Combining/Integrating Models?
• Carbon Accounting for Land Managers
            forestry.gov.uk/carboncode             Vicky West,
Woodland Carbon Code
                                    Standards
   Tools for Predicting carbon sequestration
Methods for Measuring carbon sequestration
                     Tracking carbon owners
              Clarity in use of carbon credits



                               Dr Vicky West
                        Forestry Commission
What is the Woodland Carbon Code?


• Voluntary standard for woodland creation
  projects where carbon is ‘counted’
• UK Forestry Standard – wider benefits
• Robust carbon measurement tools
• Transparent register

• Validation & Verification by
  independent certification body
• Reassurance for investors

• Similar principles to VCS,
  Gold Standard, Carbonfix
         forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
The Code - Scope

Includes:
• Woodland creation
• Carbon sequestration and emissions within a
  woodland
• Baseline, Leakage

Doesn’t include:
• Changes to management of existing
woodlands
• Carbon stored in forest products
• Substitution effects (wood products
  or fuel)
• Avoided emissions of previous landuse
          forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Progress to date

• 104 Projects registered (45 in Scotland)
   • Create 3,130 ha new woodland
   • Will sequester >1.45M tCO2e over next 100 years
  • Across the UK, range of soils and altitudes
  • Mostly native, wide mix of species. Some conifers
  • Many different owners


• 25 projects validated (18 in Scotland)
   • 41% of the area
   • 39% of the CO2


          forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Predicting C Sequestration (1)

Account for:
• Emissions from establishment
  • seedlings, ground prep (diesel), fencing, tubes, herbicide,
    fertiliser, roads
  • Best emissions factors available from FR
• Emissions from soil (disturbance)
  • Conservative estimation agreed with Edinburgh & Aberdeen
    Uni, JHI, FR
  • Assume soil C loss in year 1 (up to 20% of topsoil (0-30cm)
    carbon lost – f(soil type, intensity of disturbance))
  • Only allow soil C gain on mineral soil previously under
    arable use. More options later with improved data
• Emissions of woodland management (thinning
  and clearfelling)
  • Best estimates of fuel use from FR


          forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Predicting C sequestration (2)

     Carbon Lookup Tables
     •     FR’s CSORT model – pre-run for many scenarios:
     •     17 species - species mapping for others
     •     Various spacing, yield class, mgmt (no thin, thin, clearfell)
     •     Accumulation of Carbon in Biomass and Debris
     •     Predictions validated by certification body
                                                    Carbon                              Cumulative        Cum.     Cum. Emis. Cumulative
                                                                 Debris      Total
          Spacing   Yield                 Period   Standing                               in-period      Biomass    Ongoing      Total
Species                     Management                        (tCO2e/ha/y (tCO2/ha/y
            (m)     Class                 (year)   (tCO2e/                              (tCO2e/ha/      Sequestrn    Mgmt      Sequestrn
                                                                   r)         r)
                                                    ha/yr)                              5yr period)    (tCO2e/ha) (tCO2e/ha) (tCO2e/ha)
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin     0-5            0.62          0.18      0.80              4.0         4.0        0.00         4.0
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin     5-10           2.53          0.33      2.86             14.3        18.3        0.00        18.3
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    10-15           9.40          0.45      9.85             49.2        67.5        0.00        67.5
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    15-20          25.37          1.26     26.63            133.1       200.7        0.00      200.7
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    20-25          26.32          1.01     27.33            136.7       337.3        0.00      337.3
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    25-30          15.88          0.23     16.12             80.6       417.9        0.00      417.9
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    30-35          11.16          3.01     14.17             70.9       488.8        0.00      488.8
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    35-40           7.51          6.36     13.88             69.4       558.2        0.00      558.2
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    40-45           5.95          2.29      8.24             41.2       599.4        0.00      599.4
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    45-50           5.54         -0.06      5.48             27.4       626.7        0.00      626.7
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    50-55           5.03         -1.00      4.03             20.1       646.9        0.00      646.9
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    55-60           4.47         -1.22      3.25             16.2       663.1        0.00      663.1
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    60-65           3.96         -0.95      3.01             15.1       678.1        0.00      678.1
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    65-70           3.33         -1.21      2.12             10.6       688.7        0.00      688.7
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    70-75           2.87         -0.49      2.38             11.9       700.7        0.00      700.7
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    75-80           2.63         -0.61      2.02             10.1       710.8        0.00      710.8
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    80-85           2.44         -0.70      1.74              8.7       719.5        0.00      719.5
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    85-90           2.14         -0.22      1.92              9.6       729.1        0.00      729.1
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    90-95           1.89         -0.18      1.71              8.6       737.7        0.00      737.7
 SAB        2.5      6        NO_thin    95-100          1.68         -0.47      1.21              6.1       743.7        0.00      743.7

                            forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Predicting C sequestration (3)
Baseline
• Changes to biomass carbon without project
• Use IPCC Good Practice Guide LULUCF
 Any better estimates of stock/change to non-
  tree biomass / non-woodland soil in UK?

Leakage
• Changes to c balance outside project area
  (intensification of use or deforestation)
• UK legislation minimises likelihood
• Use IPCC Good Practice Guide LULUCF
 Any better estimates of intensification of use
  of non-woodland land in UK?
       forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Permanence: risk-based buffer

                                                     Risk Thresholds for each
Risk Category                                              risk category
                                                      Lower           Higher
                                                       Risk            Risk
Legal/Social                                            1%            2%

Project Management                                      1%            3%

Finance                                                 2%            5%

Natural Disturbance: Fire                               2%            4%

Natural Disturbance: Weather                            3%            6%

Natural Disturbance: Pest & Disease                     3%            10%

Natural Disturbance: Direct Climate Change Effects      3%            10%

Overall Risk Buffer                                  15% (Min)     40% (Max)


% of carbon sequestration to contribute to buffer

                forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Project buffer contribution




forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Verifying carbon sequestration

• Projects validated at outset and verified at year 5 +
  every 10 years (up to 100 years)

Carbon Assessment Protocol
• Sets out field measurement procedures to get
  accurate estimate of actual sequestration
• Mensuration (tree height, diameter etc)  volume
   biomass  carbon content
• FR describe best methodologies available
• Considering remote sensing/Lidar for future

• Measurements verified by certification body


          forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Tracking carbon units
• Currently: Project register (with details of
  carbon owners)
• By July 2013 – Markit Environmental Registry:
  • Project Register
  • Carbon Unit Register (Pre-Issuance Units and
    Woodland Carbon Units)
  • Web-based carbon unit ‘For Sale’ board




      forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Mandatory + Voluntary Reporting


• Mandatory reporting of GROSS GHG emissions
  from April 2013 – quoted companies
• Defra GHG emissions reporting guidance for
  organisations recommends showing GROSS
  and NET emissions.
• Overseas offsets (Kyoto and non-Kyoto)
and Woodland Carbon Code-verified
units can be used in NET.
• Markit Registry will demonstrate
use/retiral of credits




      forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Questions?

         Dr Vicky West
  vicky.west@forestry.gov.uk




www.forestry.gov.uk/carboncode

 forestry.gov.uk/carboncode

More Related Content

Similar to Introduction to the Land Use Workshop | Vicky West

Carbonsequestration through forest natural regeneration in Albania
Carbonsequestration through forest natural regeneration in AlbaniaCarbonsequestration through forest natural regeneration in Albania
Carbonsequestration through forest natural regeneration in Albaniahakikola
 
end of placement
end of placementend of placement
end of placementBRETTCOUCH1
 
Selecting Corn Silage Hybrids
Selecting Corn Silage HybridsSelecting Corn Silage Hybrids
Selecting Corn Silage Hybridsnick_roy00
 
Hydrogen Peroxide- Review of its Role as Part of a Mine Drainage Treatment St...
Hydrogen Peroxide- Review of its Role as Part of a Mine Drainage Treatment St...Hydrogen Peroxide- Review of its Role as Part of a Mine Drainage Treatment St...
Hydrogen Peroxide- Review of its Role as Part of a Mine Drainage Treatment St...Michael Hewitt, GISP
 
How Much Carbon is in a kWh? | Dr David Jenkins
How Much Carbon is in a kWh? | Dr David JenkinsHow Much Carbon is in a kWh? | Dr David Jenkins
How Much Carbon is in a kWh? | Dr David Jenkinsicarb
 
Rory Bergin - RIBA 2030 Climate Challenge
Rory Bergin - RIBA 2030 Climate ChallengeRory Bergin - RIBA 2030 Climate Challenge
Rory Bergin - RIBA 2030 Climate ChallengeIES VE
 
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptxOperation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptxPowerMurugan
 
Advancing knowledge on the costs, risks and benefits of using carbon markets ...
Advancing knowledge on the costs, risks and benefits of using carbon markets ...Advancing knowledge on the costs, risks and benefits of using carbon markets ...
Advancing knowledge on the costs, risks and benefits of using carbon markets ...CIFOR-ICRAF
 
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer ConcreteIRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer ConcreteIRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer ConcreteIRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer ConcreteIRJET Journal
 
Ready rackner for qs
Ready rackner for qsReady rackner for qs
Ready rackner for qsHiren Thakkar
 
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade N...
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade N...Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade N...
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade N...No to mining in Palawan
 
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,- Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade...
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,- Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade...Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,- Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade...
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,- Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade...Archie Casey
 
Lessons learned from injecting liquid activated carbon suspension
Lessons learned from injecting liquid activated carbon suspensionLessons learned from injecting liquid activated carbon suspension
Lessons learned from injecting liquid activated carbon suspensionAntea Group
 
Mark Killar, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, “Sewickley Creek Cost/Benefit ...
Mark Killar, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, “Sewickley Creek Cost/Benefit ...Mark Killar, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, “Sewickley Creek Cost/Benefit ...
Mark Killar, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, “Sewickley Creek Cost/Benefit ...Michael Hewitt, GISP
 
BlueScape EPA Tailoring Rule Permit Strategies 07/29/10
BlueScape EPA Tailoring Rule Permit Strategies 07/29/10BlueScape EPA Tailoring Rule Permit Strategies 07/29/10
BlueScape EPA Tailoring Rule Permit Strategies 07/29/10BlueScape
 

Similar to Introduction to the Land Use Workshop | Vicky West (20)

Carbonsequestration through forest natural regeneration in Albania
Carbonsequestration through forest natural regeneration in AlbaniaCarbonsequestration through forest natural regeneration in Albania
Carbonsequestration through forest natural regeneration in Albania
 
end of placement
end of placementend of placement
end of placement
 
Selecting Corn Silage Hybrids
Selecting Corn Silage HybridsSelecting Corn Silage Hybrids
Selecting Corn Silage Hybrids
 
Oroco Resource Corp Oco.V Feb 6 2009
Oroco Resource Corp Oco.V Feb 6 2009Oroco Resource Corp Oco.V Feb 6 2009
Oroco Resource Corp Oco.V Feb 6 2009
 
Hydrogen Peroxide- Review of its Role as Part of a Mine Drainage Treatment St...
Hydrogen Peroxide- Review of its Role as Part of a Mine Drainage Treatment St...Hydrogen Peroxide- Review of its Role as Part of a Mine Drainage Treatment St...
Hydrogen Peroxide- Review of its Role as Part of a Mine Drainage Treatment St...
 
How Much Carbon is in a kWh? | Dr David Jenkins
How Much Carbon is in a kWh? | Dr David JenkinsHow Much Carbon is in a kWh? | Dr David Jenkins
How Much Carbon is in a kWh? | Dr David Jenkins
 
Low CO2 cement. HB-CSA.pdf
Low CO2 cement. HB-CSA.pdfLow CO2 cement. HB-CSA.pdf
Low CO2 cement. HB-CSA.pdf
 
Rory Bergin - RIBA 2030 Climate Challenge
Rory Bergin - RIBA 2030 Climate ChallengeRory Bergin - RIBA 2030 Climate Challenge
Rory Bergin - RIBA 2030 Climate Challenge
 
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptxOperation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
Operation - OR for JAN 23.pptx
 
Advancing knowledge on the costs, risks and benefits of using carbon markets ...
Advancing knowledge on the costs, risks and benefits of using carbon markets ...Advancing knowledge on the costs, risks and benefits of using carbon markets ...
Advancing knowledge on the costs, risks and benefits of using carbon markets ...
 
Poster agu lenferink
Poster agu lenferinkPoster agu lenferink
Poster agu lenferink
 
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer ConcreteIRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
 
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer ConcreteIRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
IRJET- Investigation on Behaviour of MSW Geopolymer Concrete
 
Ready rackner for qs
Ready rackner for qsReady rackner for qs
Ready rackner for qs
 
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade N...
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade N...Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade N...
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade N...
 
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,- Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade...
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,- Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade...Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,- Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade...
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,- Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant For Low Grade...
 
Lessons learned from injecting liquid activated carbon suspension
Lessons learned from injecting liquid activated carbon suspensionLessons learned from injecting liquid activated carbon suspension
Lessons learned from injecting liquid activated carbon suspension
 
Gb5461 2000
Gb5461 2000Gb5461 2000
Gb5461 2000
 
Mark Killar, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, “Sewickley Creek Cost/Benefit ...
Mark Killar, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, “Sewickley Creek Cost/Benefit ...Mark Killar, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, “Sewickley Creek Cost/Benefit ...
Mark Killar, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, “Sewickley Creek Cost/Benefit ...
 
BlueScape EPA Tailoring Rule Permit Strategies 07/29/10
BlueScape EPA Tailoring Rule Permit Strategies 07/29/10BlueScape EPA Tailoring Rule Permit Strategies 07/29/10
BlueScape EPA Tailoring Rule Permit Strategies 07/29/10
 

More from icarb

Energy storage in urban multi-energy systems | Marco Carlo Masoero
Energy storage in urban multi-energy systems | Marco Carlo MasoeroEnergy storage in urban multi-energy systems | Marco Carlo Masoero
Energy storage in urban multi-energy systems | Marco Carlo Masoeroicarb
 
Emerging Scottish Policy to Promote Energy Storage | Chris Stark
Emerging Scottish Policy to Promote Energy Storage | Chris StarkEmerging Scottish Policy to Promote Energy Storage | Chris Stark
Emerging Scottish Policy to Promote Energy Storage | Chris Starkicarb
 
Current Challenges in GPC Accounting for Cities | Morten Hojer
Current Challenges in GPC Accounting for Cities | Morten HojerCurrent Challenges in GPC Accounting for Cities | Morten Hojer
Current Challenges in GPC Accounting for Cities | Morten Hojericarb
 
Welcome Presentation | Sue Roaf
Welcome Presentation | Sue RoafWelcome Presentation | Sue Roaf
Welcome Presentation | Sue Roaficarb
 
Global Protocol for Community Scale GHG Accounting | Susan Carstairs
Global Protocol for Community Scale GHG Accounting | Susan CarstairsGlobal Protocol for Community Scale GHG Accounting | Susan Carstairs
Global Protocol for Community Scale GHG Accounting | Susan Carstairsicarb
 
City Level Carbon Accounting | Philip Scott
City Level Carbon Accounting | Philip ScottCity Level Carbon Accounting | Philip Scott
City Level Carbon Accounting | Philip Scotticarb
 
Accounting for Carbon in Copenhagen | Morten Hojer
Accounting for Carbon in Copenhagen | Morten HojerAccounting for Carbon in Copenhagen | Morten Hojer
Accounting for Carbon in Copenhagen | Morten Hojericarb
 
Building & Business Level Carbon Accounting : Lessons from Business | Mike Bo...
Building & Business Level Carbon Accounting : Lessons from Business | Mike Bo...Building & Business Level Carbon Accounting : Lessons from Business | Mike Bo...
Building & Business Level Carbon Accounting : Lessons from Business | Mike Bo...icarb
 
Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories | Cha...
Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories | Cha...Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories | Cha...
Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories | Cha...icarb
 
Review of Domestic Level Carbon Accounting Tools: Lessons from a Passive Hous...
Review of Domestic Level Carbon Accounting Tools: Lessons from a Passive Hous...Review of Domestic Level Carbon Accounting Tools: Lessons from a Passive Hous...
Review of Domestic Level Carbon Accounting Tools: Lessons from a Passive Hous...icarb
 
CDP Progress & Challenges for Cities | Amanda Haworth
CDP Progress & Challenges for Cities | Amanda HaworthCDP Progress & Challenges for Cities | Amanda Haworth
CDP Progress & Challenges for Cities | Amanda Haworthicarb
 
Making Emissions Inventories Comparable and Useful | Sebastian Carney
Making Emissions Inventories Comparable and Useful | Sebastian CarneyMaking Emissions Inventories Comparable and Useful | Sebastian Carney
Making Emissions Inventories Comparable and Useful | Sebastian Carneyicarb
 
Carbon Accounting and Energy Planning in Glasgow | Graham Pinfield
Carbon Accounting and Energy Planning in Glasgow | Graham PinfieldCarbon Accounting and Energy Planning in Glasgow | Graham Pinfield
Carbon Accounting and Energy Planning in Glasgow | Graham Pinfieldicarb
 
Vision for a Renewable Scotland: Are We All Better Together? | Iain Staffell
Vision for a Renewable Scotland:Are We All Better Together? | Iain StaffellVision for a Renewable Scotland:Are We All Better Together? | Iain Staffell
Vision for a Renewable Scotland: Are We All Better Together? | Iain Staffellicarb
 
Scotland's Autarkic Vision
Scotland's Autarkic VisionScotland's Autarkic Vision
Scotland's Autarkic Visionicarb
 
Scotland Centered Energy 2030 | Stuart Haszeldine
Scotland Centered Energy 2030 | Stuart HaszeldineScotland Centered Energy 2030 | Stuart Haszeldine
Scotland Centered Energy 2030 | Stuart Haszeldineicarb
 
The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Deployment Success | Harald N Røstvik
The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Deployment Success | Harald N RøstvikThe Norwegian Electric Vehicle Deployment Success | Harald N Røstvik
The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Deployment Success | Harald N Røstvikicarb
 
Make Renewable Energy Installations Visible | Thomas Nowak
Make Renewable Energy Installations Visible | Thomas NowakMake Renewable Energy Installations Visible | Thomas Nowak
Make Renewable Energy Installations Visible | Thomas Nowakicarb
 
An Introduction to The Energy Technology Partnership (ETP) | Donald Donald ...
An Introduction to The Energy Technology Partnership (ETP) | Donald  Donald ...An Introduction to The Energy Technology Partnership (ETP) | Donald  Donald ...
An Introduction to The Energy Technology Partnership (ETP) | Donald Donald ...icarb
 
Working Sessions for Scenarios | Jaco Quist, Tony Craig, Gary Polhil
Working Sessions for Scenarios | Jaco Quist, Tony Craig, Gary PolhilWorking Sessions for Scenarios | Jaco Quist, Tony Craig, Gary Polhil
Working Sessions for Scenarios | Jaco Quist, Tony Craig, Gary Polhilicarb
 

More from icarb (20)

Energy storage in urban multi-energy systems | Marco Carlo Masoero
Energy storage in urban multi-energy systems | Marco Carlo MasoeroEnergy storage in urban multi-energy systems | Marco Carlo Masoero
Energy storage in urban multi-energy systems | Marco Carlo Masoero
 
Emerging Scottish Policy to Promote Energy Storage | Chris Stark
Emerging Scottish Policy to Promote Energy Storage | Chris StarkEmerging Scottish Policy to Promote Energy Storage | Chris Stark
Emerging Scottish Policy to Promote Energy Storage | Chris Stark
 
Current Challenges in GPC Accounting for Cities | Morten Hojer
Current Challenges in GPC Accounting for Cities | Morten HojerCurrent Challenges in GPC Accounting for Cities | Morten Hojer
Current Challenges in GPC Accounting for Cities | Morten Hojer
 
Welcome Presentation | Sue Roaf
Welcome Presentation | Sue RoafWelcome Presentation | Sue Roaf
Welcome Presentation | Sue Roaf
 
Global Protocol for Community Scale GHG Accounting | Susan Carstairs
Global Protocol for Community Scale GHG Accounting | Susan CarstairsGlobal Protocol for Community Scale GHG Accounting | Susan Carstairs
Global Protocol for Community Scale GHG Accounting | Susan Carstairs
 
City Level Carbon Accounting | Philip Scott
City Level Carbon Accounting | Philip ScottCity Level Carbon Accounting | Philip Scott
City Level Carbon Accounting | Philip Scott
 
Accounting for Carbon in Copenhagen | Morten Hojer
Accounting for Carbon in Copenhagen | Morten HojerAccounting for Carbon in Copenhagen | Morten Hojer
Accounting for Carbon in Copenhagen | Morten Hojer
 
Building & Business Level Carbon Accounting : Lessons from Business | Mike Bo...
Building & Business Level Carbon Accounting : Lessons from Business | Mike Bo...Building & Business Level Carbon Accounting : Lessons from Business | Mike Bo...
Building & Business Level Carbon Accounting : Lessons from Business | Mike Bo...
 
Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories | Cha...
Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories | Cha...Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories | Cha...
Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories | Cha...
 
Review of Domestic Level Carbon Accounting Tools: Lessons from a Passive Hous...
Review of Domestic Level Carbon Accounting Tools: Lessons from a Passive Hous...Review of Domestic Level Carbon Accounting Tools: Lessons from a Passive Hous...
Review of Domestic Level Carbon Accounting Tools: Lessons from a Passive Hous...
 
CDP Progress & Challenges for Cities | Amanda Haworth
CDP Progress & Challenges for Cities | Amanda HaworthCDP Progress & Challenges for Cities | Amanda Haworth
CDP Progress & Challenges for Cities | Amanda Haworth
 
Making Emissions Inventories Comparable and Useful | Sebastian Carney
Making Emissions Inventories Comparable and Useful | Sebastian CarneyMaking Emissions Inventories Comparable and Useful | Sebastian Carney
Making Emissions Inventories Comparable and Useful | Sebastian Carney
 
Carbon Accounting and Energy Planning in Glasgow | Graham Pinfield
Carbon Accounting and Energy Planning in Glasgow | Graham PinfieldCarbon Accounting and Energy Planning in Glasgow | Graham Pinfield
Carbon Accounting and Energy Planning in Glasgow | Graham Pinfield
 
Vision for a Renewable Scotland: Are We All Better Together? | Iain Staffell
Vision for a Renewable Scotland:Are We All Better Together? | Iain StaffellVision for a Renewable Scotland:Are We All Better Together? | Iain Staffell
Vision for a Renewable Scotland: Are We All Better Together? | Iain Staffell
 
Scotland's Autarkic Vision
Scotland's Autarkic VisionScotland's Autarkic Vision
Scotland's Autarkic Vision
 
Scotland Centered Energy 2030 | Stuart Haszeldine
Scotland Centered Energy 2030 | Stuart HaszeldineScotland Centered Energy 2030 | Stuart Haszeldine
Scotland Centered Energy 2030 | Stuart Haszeldine
 
The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Deployment Success | Harald N Røstvik
The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Deployment Success | Harald N RøstvikThe Norwegian Electric Vehicle Deployment Success | Harald N Røstvik
The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Deployment Success | Harald N Røstvik
 
Make Renewable Energy Installations Visible | Thomas Nowak
Make Renewable Energy Installations Visible | Thomas NowakMake Renewable Energy Installations Visible | Thomas Nowak
Make Renewable Energy Installations Visible | Thomas Nowak
 
An Introduction to The Energy Technology Partnership (ETP) | Donald Donald ...
An Introduction to The Energy Technology Partnership (ETP) | Donald  Donald ...An Introduction to The Energy Technology Partnership (ETP) | Donald  Donald ...
An Introduction to The Energy Technology Partnership (ETP) | Donald Donald ...
 
Working Sessions for Scenarios | Jaco Quist, Tony Craig, Gary Polhil
Working Sessions for Scenarios | Jaco Quist, Tony Craig, Gary PolhilWorking Sessions for Scenarios | Jaco Quist, Tony Craig, Gary Polhil
Working Sessions for Scenarios | Jaco Quist, Tony Craig, Gary Polhil
 

Introduction to the Land Use Workshop | Vicky West

  • 1. Welcome to the ICARB Accounting for carbon in landuse workshop forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 2. Purpose • Bring together interested parties • Consider what tools we’ve got • See if there’s anything missing • Consider if we can improve what we’ve got • See what work there is to do & think about where we go from here • Consider how ICARB can help forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 3. More integration? Woodland Expansion Advisory Group Report to Cabinet Secretary Richard Lochhead Recommendation 16: Carbon calculator. Forestry Commission Scotland should produce a simple to use ‘carbon ready-reckoner’ which allows land managers to identify whether –and by how much – woodland creation could help to reduce their land management carbon footprint. SG response states: To be completed by June 2013. forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 4. ICARB C acct landuse :Agenda Woodlands • Woodland Carbon Code/Wdld Creation Vicky West, FC • CSORT/CARBINE – Woodland Management Paul Henshall, FR Agriculture • SAC Farm Tool Julian Bell, SAC/SRUC • The Cool Farm Tool John Hillier, Aberdeen Uni Peatlands • Peatland Restoration Tool Rebekka Artz, JHI • Peat Carbon Code / Peatland Restoration Clifton Bain, IUCN Models vs Measurement • GHG emissions from measurements and modelling Bob Rees, SAC/SRUC Combining/Integrating Models? • Carbon Accounting for Land Managers forestry.gov.uk/carboncode Vicky West,
  • 5. Woodland Carbon Code Standards Tools for Predicting carbon sequestration Methods for Measuring carbon sequestration Tracking carbon owners Clarity in use of carbon credits Dr Vicky West Forestry Commission
  • 6. What is the Woodland Carbon Code? • Voluntary standard for woodland creation projects where carbon is ‘counted’ • UK Forestry Standard – wider benefits • Robust carbon measurement tools • Transparent register • Validation & Verification by independent certification body • Reassurance for investors • Similar principles to VCS, Gold Standard, Carbonfix forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 7. The Code - Scope Includes: • Woodland creation • Carbon sequestration and emissions within a woodland • Baseline, Leakage Doesn’t include: • Changes to management of existing woodlands • Carbon stored in forest products • Substitution effects (wood products or fuel) • Avoided emissions of previous landuse forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 8. Progress to date • 104 Projects registered (45 in Scotland) • Create 3,130 ha new woodland • Will sequester >1.45M tCO2e over next 100 years • Across the UK, range of soils and altitudes • Mostly native, wide mix of species. Some conifers • Many different owners • 25 projects validated (18 in Scotland) • 41% of the area • 39% of the CO2 forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 9. Predicting C Sequestration (1) Account for: • Emissions from establishment • seedlings, ground prep (diesel), fencing, tubes, herbicide, fertiliser, roads • Best emissions factors available from FR • Emissions from soil (disturbance) • Conservative estimation agreed with Edinburgh & Aberdeen Uni, JHI, FR • Assume soil C loss in year 1 (up to 20% of topsoil (0-30cm) carbon lost – f(soil type, intensity of disturbance)) • Only allow soil C gain on mineral soil previously under arable use. More options later with improved data • Emissions of woodland management (thinning and clearfelling) • Best estimates of fuel use from FR forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 10. Predicting C sequestration (2) Carbon Lookup Tables • FR’s CSORT model – pre-run for many scenarios: • 17 species - species mapping for others • Various spacing, yield class, mgmt (no thin, thin, clearfell) • Accumulation of Carbon in Biomass and Debris • Predictions validated by certification body Carbon Cumulative Cum. Cum. Emis. Cumulative Debris Total Spacing Yield Period Standing in-period Biomass Ongoing Total Species Management (tCO2e/ha/y (tCO2/ha/y (m) Class (year) (tCO2e/ (tCO2e/ha/ Sequestrn Mgmt Sequestrn r) r) ha/yr) 5yr period) (tCO2e/ha) (tCO2e/ha) (tCO2e/ha) SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 0-5 0.62 0.18 0.80 4.0 4.0 0.00 4.0 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 5-10 2.53 0.33 2.86 14.3 18.3 0.00 18.3 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 10-15 9.40 0.45 9.85 49.2 67.5 0.00 67.5 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 15-20 25.37 1.26 26.63 133.1 200.7 0.00 200.7 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 20-25 26.32 1.01 27.33 136.7 337.3 0.00 337.3 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 25-30 15.88 0.23 16.12 80.6 417.9 0.00 417.9 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 30-35 11.16 3.01 14.17 70.9 488.8 0.00 488.8 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 35-40 7.51 6.36 13.88 69.4 558.2 0.00 558.2 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 40-45 5.95 2.29 8.24 41.2 599.4 0.00 599.4 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 45-50 5.54 -0.06 5.48 27.4 626.7 0.00 626.7 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 50-55 5.03 -1.00 4.03 20.1 646.9 0.00 646.9 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 55-60 4.47 -1.22 3.25 16.2 663.1 0.00 663.1 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 60-65 3.96 -0.95 3.01 15.1 678.1 0.00 678.1 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 65-70 3.33 -1.21 2.12 10.6 688.7 0.00 688.7 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 70-75 2.87 -0.49 2.38 11.9 700.7 0.00 700.7 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 75-80 2.63 -0.61 2.02 10.1 710.8 0.00 710.8 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 80-85 2.44 -0.70 1.74 8.7 719.5 0.00 719.5 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 85-90 2.14 -0.22 1.92 9.6 729.1 0.00 729.1 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 90-95 1.89 -0.18 1.71 8.6 737.7 0.00 737.7 SAB 2.5 6 NO_thin 95-100 1.68 -0.47 1.21 6.1 743.7 0.00 743.7 forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 11. Predicting C sequestration (3) Baseline • Changes to biomass carbon without project • Use IPCC Good Practice Guide LULUCF  Any better estimates of stock/change to non- tree biomass / non-woodland soil in UK? Leakage • Changes to c balance outside project area (intensification of use or deforestation) • UK legislation minimises likelihood • Use IPCC Good Practice Guide LULUCF  Any better estimates of intensification of use of non-woodland land in UK? forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 12. Permanence: risk-based buffer Risk Thresholds for each Risk Category risk category Lower Higher Risk Risk Legal/Social 1% 2% Project Management 1% 3% Finance 2% 5% Natural Disturbance: Fire 2% 4% Natural Disturbance: Weather 3% 6% Natural Disturbance: Pest & Disease 3% 10% Natural Disturbance: Direct Climate Change Effects 3% 10% Overall Risk Buffer 15% (Min) 40% (Max) % of carbon sequestration to contribute to buffer forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 14. Verifying carbon sequestration • Projects validated at outset and verified at year 5 + every 10 years (up to 100 years) Carbon Assessment Protocol • Sets out field measurement procedures to get accurate estimate of actual sequestration • Mensuration (tree height, diameter etc)  volume  biomass  carbon content • FR describe best methodologies available • Considering remote sensing/Lidar for future • Measurements verified by certification body forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 15. Tracking carbon units • Currently: Project register (with details of carbon owners) • By July 2013 – Markit Environmental Registry: • Project Register • Carbon Unit Register (Pre-Issuance Units and Woodland Carbon Units) • Web-based carbon unit ‘For Sale’ board forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 16. Mandatory + Voluntary Reporting • Mandatory reporting of GROSS GHG emissions from April 2013 – quoted companies • Defra GHG emissions reporting guidance for organisations recommends showing GROSS and NET emissions. • Overseas offsets (Kyoto and non-Kyoto) and Woodland Carbon Code-verified units can be used in NET. • Markit Registry will demonstrate use/retiral of credits forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
  • 17. Questions? Dr Vicky West vicky.west@forestry.gov.uk www.forestry.gov.uk/carboncode forestry.gov.uk/carboncode