Impact of Conservation Agriculture on Food Security in Zimbabwe
1. The Impact of Conservation
Agriculture on Food Security
in two districts of Zimbabwe
Paul Wagstaff,
Agriculture Advisor, Concern Worldwide
Malachy Harty,
International Development & Food Policy, UCC
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
2. 2
Problems with Conventional
Agriculture
• Reduction of soil fertility and physical structure
Increased erosion
• High labour/ energy requirement - barrier to
participation for poor, sick or elderly farmers
Delayed planting
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
3. 3
The Principles of Conservation
Agriculture (CA)
• 1. Avoid Soil Disturbance
– Planting basins
– direct seed drills
– rippers
– jab planters
• 2. Soil Cover
– Mulching with crop residues
– Cover crops
• 3. Crop Rotation
Planting pits in Zimbabwe
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
4. 4
Resiliance to Climate Change
Improved soil structure – reduced erosion
Water retained in soil
Conservation
Low impact - avoids problems of conventional agriculture
Low carbon system of food production
Potential value as a carbon sink, but results unclear
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
5. 5
Challenges and Limitations of CA
• Retention of residues for mulch cover
• Different spacings for rotation crops
• Labour in first years
• Change of mindset
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
6. 6
Zimbabwe
Gokwe North
Gokwe South
Nyanga
8. 8
Where do the yield benefits of Conservation
Farming come from? (GART, Zambia)
Value of Conservation Agriculture even if simply to plant on time!
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
9. 9
Conservation Farming in Zimbabwe
• No draught animals so system based on preparing planting
basins during the dry season
• Intensive extension support
• 50 x 50m Conservation Farming plots (1/4 ha) per household
• ½ maize, ¼ sorghum, ¼ groundnuts/ cowpeas
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
10. 10
Overview of Household Economy
Approach (HEA)
How people in different social and economic circumstances get the food
and cash they need
Hyper inflationary situation – cash values irrelevant
Crop production and income converted into kilo calorie equivalents
2,100 kcal per person per day survival threshold
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
11. 11
FIGURE 4: Crop Production (GKN)
1000
800
millet
KGs produced
600 cowpeas
400 groundnuts
200 sorghum
maize
0
CF V. Poor V. Poor CF Poor Poor GKN
GKN GKN GKN
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
12. 12
FIGURE 6: Sources of Food
140% barter
% of annual food needs
120% wild food
100%
food aid
80%
60% purchase
40% payment in kind
20% l'stock products
0%
crops
CF V. Poor V. Poor GKN CF Poor GKN Poor GKN
GKN
Difficult political and economic situation, poor rains - all groups received food aid
Poor Conservation Farmers would have needed 50% less food aid than the control
group.
The very poor control group had to undertake much more casual labour for food
which may have resulted in taking children out of school, less time available to
prepare food, take children to health centres, etc
13. 13
Results
CF farmers do not require food aid and are producing
larger surpluses than conventional farmers
2010: INGOs will buy maize surpluses from the CF
farmers to distribute to food deficit areas of Zimbabwe!
Concern currently expanding CA to Tanzania (EU),
Zambia & Malawi (Accenture), Liberia
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10
14. 14
No magic bullets
Water
Markets, trade, infrastructure
Research
Extension and education
Health
Financial services and insurance
Inputs
Land tenure
Environment
Malachy Harty, Trocaire Development Review, 12/11/10