Two Programs, One Service - Presentation Transcript
Two Programs, One Service: Recursive Assessment in the Gelman Library System's IM Reference Service American Library Association Annual Conference 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Sarah Palacios-Wilhelm Reference & Instruction Librarian Eckles Library Elizabeth Edwards Reference/Technology Librarian Gelman Library
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Abstract
This virtual poster session presents the recursive implementation process utilized by the George Washington University’s Gelman Library System in the context of its successful IM reference service. In this presentation, librarians from two campus libraries discuss the advantages of using pilot testing in a recursive cycle to inform testing, implementation, and evaluation of services, software, training, and assessment models. This process has resulted in a climate that encourages innovation and decreases anxiety amongst service providers. Specific examples of recursive implementation are explored, as well as challenges faced throughout the process. The presentation closes with a list of lessons learned that will inform institutions that wish to follow a similar model.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Background
In 2005, the Gelman Library System pilot tested the delivery of reference services via IM. This pilot test began at Eckles Library, which serves a primarily residential and freshman population. Since its inception, this service has expanded to include Gelman Library, which serves the entire University population. During the 2006-2007 school year the IM reference service fielded 1,458 questions, and was nominated for a campus-wide Service Excellence Award. The success of this service is in no small part a result of the innovative testing and evaluation model that integrates the two campuses in a recursive cycle.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The George Washington University
Located in the heart of the Foggy Bottom neighborhood of Washington, D.C.
Comprised of nine schools:
Columbian College of Arts & Sciences
School of Medicine & Health Sciences
Law School
School of Engineering & Applied Science
Graduate School of Education & Human Development
School of Business
Elliott School of International Affairs
School of Public Health & Health Services
College of Professional Studies
High research activity according to Carnegie ratings.
17,494 students enrolled full-time in Fall 2007.
7,092 degrees conferred in 2007, including 264 Doctorates.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Gelman Library System Gelman Library System Gelman Library Eckles Library Virginia Campus Library
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session
Gelman Library
Main library for urban campus
30,000 visitors per week
Reference desk staffed by 17 librarians with assistance from student workers
IM service established in Fall 2006
Eckles Library
Small library serving residential campus
7,000 visitors per week
Single service point staffed by 2 librarians, 3 staff, and 7 students
IM service piloted in 2005, established in 2005
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Models of Implementation
The “Normal” Implementation Process
The Recursive Implementation Process
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The "Normal" Implementation Process
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The "Normal" Implementation Process
Each phase has a defined beginning and end.
Each phase occurs in order.
Pilot programs lead directly to implementation.
Test groups are organized as necessary, but do not persist after the implementation process is complete.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The "Normal" Implementation Process: An Example
A problem is identified: patrons are eating in the library, which is in violation of library policy.
A solution is proposed: create a space where patrons can eat without violating library policy.
Pilot testing: a student lounge is opened, and patrons attempting to bring food into the library are directed to this new space.
Implementation: the student lounge is used for a special event, drawing attention to the new space.
Evaluation: the problem of patrons eating in the library has not decreased. A new solution must be devised.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Recursive Implementation Process
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Recursive Implementation Process
In the recursive implementation process, testing, implementation, evaluation, and reflection are cyclical, with each step returning to the pilot setting.
Problems can be identified at any location, and solutions are proposed based on previous experience, understanding of patron needs, and possible resources.
Pilot testing occurs with a selected population, informed by feedback from ongoing brainstorming and evaluation from both locations.
Based on success in the pilot phase, implementation expands to include both locations, with the next phase of brainstorming or pilot testing beginning at the smaller location.
Evaluation is an ongoing process, incorporating both formal and informal methods of assessment.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Recursive Model in Practice
Pilot Testing
Service Hours
Staffing Models
Training
Assessment
Platform Testing
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Recursive Model in Practice: Pilot Testing
Experience with virtual reference collaboratively staffed with other local academic libraries resulted in hesitation about new forms of electronic reference.
Librarians at Eckles, in an attempt to provide enhanced service for their small, tech-savvy population, recognized the potential of IM for service delivery and experimented with IM reference with limited hours.
Following the positive reception at Eckles, the IM service expanded to Gelman with limited hours, with ongoing evaluation occurring at both locations.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Recursive Model in Practice: Service Hours
After the initial pilot, Eckles expanded service hours.
Eckles' statistics revealed peak hours, resulting in an expansion of Gelman's service hours.
Demand for Eckles’ service decreased as a result of Gelman's expansion.
Statistics allow both campuses to anticipate service needs and inform discussions of staffing models.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Recursive Model in Practice: Staffing Models
Eckles' service was initially staffed by one librarian, with additional support from student workers.
Gelman's service was initially staffed by librarians from individual desks.
Gelman’s distributed model proved problematic, so service moved to librarian staffing at the reference desk, with assistance from student workers.
Eckles' service moved to triage staffing model using student workers, with librarians available for questions.
Gelman is exploring new staffing models in the context of moving to a single service point and incorporating new departments into the IM reference service.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Recursive Model in Practice: Training
Technology-adept student workers at Eckles complete reference service training modules developed for new Gelman librarians.
Gelman librarians receive training on new technologies first piloted at Eckles.
The exchange of training modules draws on the expertise and improves the skills of service providers at both campuses.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Recursive Model in Practice: Assessment
Usage statistics from both locations are used to inform how the services are tested, implemented, and expanded.
Question-type statistics from both locations are used to inform staffing models and training.
Ongoing qualitative transcript analysis is used to inform service definition, training, and staffing models.
"Secret Shopper" evaluation used in student worker training at Eckles identified larger training needs, which will inform future training strategies that will be used at Gelman.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session The Recursive Model in Practice: Platform Testing
Eckles adopted Trillian and Pidgin/GAIM.
Gelman adopted Trillian.
Eckles abandoned Pidgin/GAIM for Trillian.
Eckles tested and adopted Trillian Pro.
Gelman adopted Trillian Pro.
Platform testing remains an ongoing project, with Meebo and other widgets under consideration for implementation.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Challenges of the Recursive Model
Scalability
Service Providers
Patrons
Trying new things is always hard
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Challenges of the Recursive Model: Scalability
Organizational challenges differ between locations.
Recursive cycle does not always flow evenly.
The larger the organization or the greater the bureaucracy, the more staff time and energy will be required to encourage and implement innovation.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Challenges of the Recursive Model: Service Providers
Service providers vary in technology skills, attitudes towards service, and interpretations of service requirements.
Training models vary based on staff needs, which will affect the service provided at each location.
Staffing models directly affect the quality of service provided.
Technology in different contexts may affect providers’ ease of use.
Familiarity with appropriate resources will affect the service provided.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Challenges of the Recursive Model: Patrons
Even the most representative pilot group will be different than the full population of both sites.
Patrons may be less patient with the new service or changes in service.
The service may not be able to meet the expectations of patrons used to more personalized service in the pilot location.
Patron usage may shift away from the pilot location as services expand, which may result in a smaller population for future testing.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Challenges of the Recursive Model
Trying new things is always hard.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Lessons Learned from the Recursive Model
Effective Pilot Groups
Identifying Pilot Groups
What Not to Do
Reflections
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Lessons Learned from the Recursive Model
Effective Pilot Groups
Create a safer environment for testing, which inspires innovation.
Include both providers and patrons.
Facilitate a two-way conversation.
Provide both positive and negative feedback.
Allow your audience to engage in the testing process.
Work collaboratively: with you rather than for you .
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Lessons Learned from the Recursive Model
Identifying Pilot Groups
Look for groups with a population that changes regularly:
Freshmen or graduating seniors
Student workers
Groups with a small population:
Special or departmental libraries
Branch libraries
Cohort-based programs
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Lessons Learned from the Recursive Model
What Not to Do
Don’t use your staff as a pilot group.
Needs are not the same as those of patrons.
Expectations are not the same as those of patrons.
Feedback will reflect service provider concerns and biases rather than genuine patron experience.
Don’t forget about staff input.
While not representative of patron experience, the service provider’s perspective is critical to any new service.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Lessons Learned from the Recursive Model
Reflections
Innovation encourages cycles of evaluation and improvement in other service areas.
Challenges or failures will not derail other library services when done in parallel.
Established framework for comparison and improvement builds an expectation of ongoing evaluation.
Stagnation is prevented because something interesting is always happening.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Lessons Learned from the Recursive Model
You Can Do It!
The process has been challenging, but has proved to be both successful and rewarding.
Creating an environment that facilitates innovation also sparks excitement among service providers, ensuring that library service remains dynamic and relevant for the patron.
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session Contact Information
Sarah Palacios-Wilhelm Reference & Instruction Librarian Eckles Library [email_address] AIM/Google Talk/ Yahoo!: sarahpwilhelm Elizabeth Edwards Reference/Technology Librarian Gelman Library [email_address] AIM: leepforward AIM/Google Talk/Yahoo!: GelmanInfo and EcklesInfo
Two Programs, One Service: 2008 MERS Virtual Poster Session
Presentation prepared for:
2008 American Library Association Annual Conference
MARS Management of Electronic Resources and Services (MERS) Committee
This virtual poster session presents recursive impl more
This virtual poster session presents recursive implementation process utilized by the Gelman Library System to implement and evaluate the IM reference service. The recursive implantation process is juxtaposed with a more traditional model of program implementation. The presenters provide specific examples of how the model was implemented and a review of the challenges faced throughout the process. The presentation closes with a list of lessons learned that will inform institutions that wish to follow a similar model. less
0 comments
Post a comment