Summary of an_evaluation_study_of_educational_technology_week1
Proposal don by alkaabi 68713
1. Assuring Quality in Kaab (school)<br />Match ministry standers<br />Abdullah Alkaabi<br />SQU<br />(Overview):<br />This proposal is about quality assuring in Kaab School where I internship in my practical day. My proposal is to ensure that school; teachers and students did the good job and achieve the ministry goals by measure the quality in teaching.<br />This school is in second circle that’s mean from grade 5to grade 10. This institution introduces teaching for the learner in age of 10 to 16. My plane is to assess this school in three dimensions which is personal (teachers and students), environment (school and classes) and curriculum which is books.<br />Personnel: <br />School as institution contain personnel (teachers), teachers as instructors they teach students knowledge and skills. I will assess these teachers in method of teaching, using technology in teaching, attendance all the classes and their information about the subject that are teaching.<br />Curriculum: <br />School as institution contain curriculum which is books and teacher guide books. In my plan I will assess this Curriculum: dose it achieve the goals of ministry, dose it compatible with real situation in school, dose the school have the recourse that book required.<br />Environment: <br />My environment is an Omani school in Muscat region, its culture as Omani school students respect the teacher and study hard. Unfortunately, school lack a lot of technologies of teaching like many PCs are not working, LCD not clear, LRTC not work as ministry plan. All this factors are affect students achieving and grade. But by the end the school has internet connection and OHP work probably<br />Tool for Assessment:<br />I will use multi tools for assessment in each target:<br />Personnel: in this target I will use questioner to assess teachers teaching like that:<br />1. Teacher use multi method of teaching (mention them) …Agree, disagree, not applicable.<br />2. Teacher used internet in teaching….. Agree, disagree, not applicable.<br />3. Teacher used PowerPoint slide in teaching.<br />4. Teacher attends all the classes and investigates the time.<br />5. Teacher used additional recourses in teaching.<br />Curriculum: <br />In this target I will use checklist to assure the main points in our curriculum like that:<br />ItemYesNoThe book have enough pictures in subjectDose the version of software is the same version in PC labThe book updated with new issues. <br /> <br />. Environment:<br />In this target I will use checklist to assure that environment will achieve the ministry and plan goals.<br />ItemYesNoLRTC contain additional recourses for subjects.Computer labs are workingSchool has suitable temperature in classes. <br />Recourses:<br /> http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeID=78&langno=1<br />http://education-portal.com/quality_assurance_courses.html<br /> <br />Fishbone diagramSchool will achieve the ministry standers.PersonnelTeachers use multi method In teaching Teachers used additional recourses in teachingEnvironmentSchool need more recourses in LRTCCurriculum: Books have enough picturesBooks updated with new Issues School needs more PC machine School need updated Software <br />