The document compares differences between Standard English and Singlish in morphology, semantics, phonetics/phonology, lexicology, and syntax. In morphology, Singlish is more optional with plurals and past tenses. Lexicology shows repetition for emphasis in Singlish and new particles like "lah." Phonetics/phonology demonstrates differences in consonant pronunciation and a fast speaking pace in Singlish. Regarding syntax, Singlish uses fewer words and is not always in the correct order compared to Standard English.

1. Comparing the differences between
Standard English and Singlish
By Vladislav Vlajic

2. I will talk about...
• Morphology’
• Semantics
• Phonetics/phonology
• Lexicology
• Syntax
• Describing new metalanguage of new Singlish
words as well

3. Morphology
• The main areas that Standard English and Singapore English differentiates
in the Subsystem of Morphology is that a lot of grammatical endings that is
compulsory in Standard English that speakers have to take into account,
• In Singlish it is very much optional.
• Plurals and past tenses is not needed to be taken into consideration with
Singapore colloquial speakers.
• An example of what you might hear when faced with Singlish speakers:
• > What happen yesterday?
• > You go where?
• > Got so many car!
• Then bicycle go first ah ( instead of “So the bicycle went first.)
• > I just sit and everything do for me!
• This information was found from this link:
<http://www.hawaii.edu/satocenter/langnet/definitions/singlish.html#voca
b-SCE> date accessed: 21/10/11 on the section under “Grammar,”

4. Lexicology differences: “Whose Centric now?” Singlish
Transcript:
• This is a snippet of a transcript by a Singapore student showing us an example of a police-taped
conversation between two people ( Teo and Yap,) in Singlish:
• Teo: ( Sigh) Something very big has...happened.
• Yap: What thing happen? I know at my client’s place, know?
• Teo: ...Uh, I'm now under investigation.
• Yap: why you are now under investigation?
• Teo: Yeah by.... CPIB
• Yap: Why?
• Teo: I just got the news.
• Yap: What news?
• Teo: I don’t know what, I don't know what case. Just... Just now around 4 o'clock, I was being called
up.
• Yap: Call up by who?
• Teo: Okay. One of my, one of my CIO lah.
• Yap: Who’s your, who’s you CIO?
• Teo: Don’t ask who lah! Why you ask ask ask?
• Yap: You so fierce for what?
• Teo: I'm not fierce okay. I’m very blur now okay! I’m very messy now!
• Yap: Okay, Okay, Okay, Okay!
further reading : (Macmillan English Language VCE units 1 and 2 book, page 261, ) and the website:
(http://www.hawaii.edu/satocenter/langnet/definitions/singlish.html#sounds-SCE Date accessed:
22/10/11) on more information about various ways Singlish differentiates from Standard English!

5. Lexicology continued
• - As this quote defined by Gupta, “the main difference *of Singlish+
from Standard English is the lexis is dominated by English.” reference:
(Gupta (1992:62)
A frequent repetition of words in Singlish for the use of emphasis and
intensity. E.g. “Don’t ask who Lah! Why you ask ask ask?”
Standard English, repetition is not used , even for intensity, the word is
usually only said once, like, “Why do you ask?”
• Auxiliary words are missing. E.g. In the Question “Why you ask ask
ask? The Primary auxiliary word “do,” is missing in between Why and
you to make the proper Standard English form, “Why do you ask?”

6. Lexicology continued
• Frequent use of new particles in Singaporean English such
as “Lah,” to indicate “ Impatience, Emphasise something, A
completed action or that something is self evident.”
(Macmillan English Language VCE units 1 & 2 pages 260-2)
• Metalanguage: A new Singlish word was introduced, such
as the word, “Blur,” “meaning 'confused, ignorant‘,
• (<http://www.hawaii.edu/satocenter/langnet/definitions/si
nglish.html#bkgd-SCE> date accessed: 22/10/11)
• Referenced from : “Who’s centric now?” by Vincent B.Y.
Ooi, (3rd edition, (2009 ) Kate. Burridge, Caroline Thomas,
Jean Mulder, Macmillan English language VCE units 1 & 2,
pages 261-2)

7. YouTube clip on lexicology of Singlish
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddqw1AFJqUk&feature=related
• There were examples, where the conjunction word “ and,” and “If,”
were missing in the Singlish version.
• In SE conjunctions were used.
• SE sentences and phrases are much longer/ contain more words
than Singlish.
• Determiner words are also missing in Singlish, as the words such as
“The,” and “A,” were not used.
• Pronouns were not used in Singlish as it was used in the Standard
English examples of the YouTube clip.
E.g. the Words “We” and “they,” were not used in the sentences of
Singlish, while in Standard English, it was used.

8. Phonology/Phonetics differences
• The various differences between the two languages in terms of
consonants is that:
• - e.g. Unlike in Standard English where words such as ‘ Rice,’ and
Rise,’ will sound different, Singlish, does not take into account
distinguishing between voiced and voiceless fricatives.
• This also affects the (f) and (v) sounds and the (th) and (dh) sounds.
• People, “in informal speech, do not distinguish between voiced and
voiceless plosives in final position,” so in Singlish, people can say
‘Hob,’ instead of Hop and ‘Back,’ instead of ‘Bag,’ referenced
from:(<http://www.hawaii.edu/satocenter/langnet/definitions/singlis
h.html#sounds-SCE> date accessed: 22/10/11)

9. Phonetics/phonology:
Read this article:
• The highlighted word should have been cost
rather than cause.
• This seems to have a phonological basis.
• When in Standard English it is pronounced as
/kɒst/ and /kɔ:z/
• The first explanation/factor for this is the fact
that vowels differ in other variates of English, in
this example there is a distinction between short
/ɒ/(o)and long /ɔ/ (”or”)
• 2nd factor is the final letter of the word, “Cause,”
where /z/ becomes (s) or is pronounced as (S) in
Singlish.
• which leads to course and cause being /kɒs/ or
/kɔ:s/ in Singapore English.
• The simplification of consonant clusters, leads to
the loss of /t/ in ‘cost.’

10. Phonetics: Intonation of Singlish
compared to Standard English
• Singlish is known to be spoken at a very fast paced that it was quoted as a
'machine gun' style when spoken.
(<http://www.hawaii.edu/satocenter/langnet/definitions/singlish.html#sounds-
SCE> date accessed: 22/10/11)
• It has its own distinctive rhythm.
• In Standard English, it is spoken slower and the words/phrases are pronounced
more.
• The YouTube clip e.g.:
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddqw1AFJqUk&feature=related

11. Comparisons of the two languages with sentence
structures.
• focus on the meaning of the phrase, “It is,” and how it is used to describe both of
the languages. A sentence example:
• “That was a fantastic concert, wasn’t it?
• “That was a fantastic concert, is it?”
• In presumption, The Singapore English Tag is acceptable if the speaker is asking
the other person whether the concert was fantastic. But if it is to state their own
opinions then it would not work.
• Standard English can be combined with knowledge, Singlish hardly does so.
• Another example: The Standard English quote: “We were in Brighton weren’t we,
in August, of last year?

12. Comparisons of the two languages
with sentence structures.
• It would sound like a genuine question if we swap the Standard
English phrase “weren’t we,’ with the Singlish phrase, “ It is.”
• the Singlish words, “It is,” is very different to that of the Standard
English. Firstly, the Singlish word implies that the speaker expects
agreement.
• A standard English phrase combines with a preposition in which
the speaker knows its true, (e.g., We were in Brighton, weren’t
we?”)
• (http://benjamins.com/jbp/series/P&C/16-1/art/06won.pdf>
date accessed:23/10/11)
• But, the Singlish term does not!
• E.g. “ We were in Brighton, is it?”
• Is only used if a speaker is unsure about something.

13. Syntax comparisons
• The way Standard English and Singlish
differentiates in terms of Syntax is by looking
at this Image example:
•

14. •
As the Syntax, The Image of an Imperative sign that says
To do with
previous image shows...
“No Food from elsewhere, please!” is directing us, in Singlish
to do something.
• differs from standard English because it is not in the correct
order,
• There are less words used that would be used in Standard
English.
• E.g.. In standard English, This Imperative phrase would be
correctly translated to either one of the three below:
• “Only for the consumption of food purchased here.”
• “Only for food purchased here.”
• “Not for the consumption of food bought elsewhere.”
This example was found from the link,”
http://englishasitisbroken.blogspot.com/search/label/Singlish
> date accessed: 23/110.11) from the Singlish section of the
blog

15. References:
THE END
Writer: John Benjamin <http://benjamins.com/jbp/series/P&C/16-1/art/06won.pdf> writer: John Benjamin's
publishing company)
 ( My English Language Blog: Phonetics and Phonology
http://englishasitisbroken.blogspot.com/search/label/Phonetics%20and%20Phonology writer: Ludwig
Tan)
 Idea, http://web.ku.edu/~idea/asia/singapore/singapore1.mp3 writer: IDEA
 Singapore English- a Knol by David Deterding: <http://knol.google.com/k/singapore-
english#Phonology > Publishers: IDEA)
 http://www.ubd.edu.bn/academic/faculty/FASS_V2.1/staff/papers/DD/JIPA-Sing-intonation.pdf
< http://www.ubd.edu.bn/academic/faculty/FASS_V2.1/staff/papers/DD/JIPA-Sing-intonation.pdf > The
intonation of Singapore English, writer: David Deterding
 The new Englishes http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elltankw/history/NE.htm writer unknown.)
 Singlish: < http://www.hawaii.edu/satocenter/langnet/definitions/singlish.html > writer unknown)
 Yoonsoonchye < http://www.als.asn.au/proceedings/als2009/yoongsoonchye.pdf > Writer unknown
 YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddqw1A FJqUk Childhoodspeech
 Further Information and reading:
 My English Language blog: http://englishasitisbroken.blogspot.com/search/label/Singlish Ludwig Tan
 Mulder, J, Burridge, K, Thomas, C, (2009) Macmillan English Language VCE UNITS 1 and 2, Published:
Macmillan Education Australia, pp: 260-262 and 27-40)
 http://benjamins.com/jbp/series/P&C/16-1/art/06won.pdf
< http://benjamins.com/jbp/series/P&C/16-1/art/06won.pdf > Ben Johnson's publishing company)