How Sustainable Procurement Policies Deliver Better Facilities and Benefit the Local Community - Professor John Lorimer
•Download as PPT, PDF•
2 likes•819 views
![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (15)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to How Sustainable Procurement Policies Deliver Better Facilities and Benefit the Local Community - Professor John Lorimer
Similar to How Sustainable Procurement Policies Deliver Better Facilities and Benefit the Local Community - Professor John Lorimer (20)
More from School of the Built Environment - University of Salford
More from School of the Built Environment - University of Salford (11)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
How Sustainable Procurement Policies Deliver Better Facilities and Benefit the Local Community - Professor John Lorimer
- 1. visiting professor lecture series John Lorimer Manchester City Council 23 February 2011
- 4. Terrorists Crime Bullying Global Warming Education & Employment Sustainable? Identity The Drivers
- 5. Am I too old Who can open the doors Blow this for a game of soldiers I have no identity Apprentices & Skills Where do I belong I see no future Can anyone help How do I get off benefits This is depressing
- 7. Supplier £42 Contractor £33 Client £18 Designer £7 Where does £100 go? Key challenges
- 8. 80 Carbon Stairway Key challenges Kg Co ² / m² 0 10 20 60 50 40 30 70 2003 Final 20% G2D2 renewable target 10 2002 Regulated 60% Reduction. DCSF. 16.8 2006 Regulated 25% Reduction G2D2 22.5 2006 Regulated 30 2002 Regulated 42 2003 Final DfES benchmark figures 52 2006 Final 5 London Academies 72
- 16. The way we work
- 17. Benefits - ‘Provide More for Less’ Traditional versus Collaborative 7% Construction Cost Saving 85% saving on overspend 9-13% saving on fees Potential claim varies typically 5% The difference in the cost of procurement and construction using the Collaborative, Managed Frameworks such as NWCH as opposed to Traditional 3 4 2 5 £/m Construction Cost Construction Cost Overspend Overspend Fees Fees Contractual Claim Collaborative Traditional
- 18. ‘ Provide More for Less’ Local Spend – Case Study Benefits 88-89% 11-12% Spend outside of AGMA It has been demonstrated that by procuring construction work through collaborative arrangements, such as NWCH frameworks, it is possible for the vast majority of the project spend to remain within the sub region Case Study West Gorton New Build Housing, £23m with Framework Partners GB Building Solutions and Bramall Construction Spend within Greater Manchester Sub Region (AGMA) 38% Spend within Manchester City boundary
- 20. Framework benefits Benefits 9% Saving on project costs 10-15% Time savings 1-2% Capital cost savings – result of not tendering
- 24. Headline News “ Of £357m procurement spend across the top 300 MCC suppliers 86.5% is spent in Greater Manchester. Furthermore, 25p in every £1 is re-spent by our suppliers on employees, products or services within the city region.” Benefits
- 30. A franchise Sub regional lots Promote sub regional engagement & ownership Encourage participation from sub regional contractors Generic model for framework management
- 33. NWCH - Collaboration NWCH
- 35. Thank You