1. Killer Online Design
and Teaching Techniques
Raymond Rose
Rose & Smith Associates
Port Aransas, Texas
Coastal Bend College
August 18, 2016
Slides available at:
http://www.slideshare.net/RaymondRose
This work by Raymond Rose is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Done this before.
Over Two Decades
of successful online education
courses and programs
– Designing
– Developing
– Facilitating
– Managing
– Advising
4. Your turn: an Experience survey
• Taught F2F >20 yrs, >15, >10, >5?
• Taught online >20 yrs, >15, >10, >5?
• Taken an online course?
• Taken a hybrid, web-enhanced course?
• Had a bad experience taking an
on-campus course?
5. What about you?
What is your preferred learning style?
What’s your favorite topic (content piece)
to teach?
What is your least favorite topic to teach?
What topic do your students have the
most problem with?
8. Myths about learning online
• F2F learning is superior to online
• Online courses are easier than F2F
• Students don’t learn as much online
• Online learning is lonely and impersonal
• You must provide F2F events for
students to really know each other
9. The Promise of Online Education
We were promised. . .
– “Anytime” access without a bell schedule
– Ability to access courses 24/7
– “Any place” learning outside of school
– An unlimited course catalog
– Learners self-directed and responsible
– Instructors reaching more learners
10. The Predicament of the Reality
Online education isn’t easy!
–Online instructors can feel
overwhelmed
–Online learners can feel overwhelmed
11. Instructors & Learners Feel Overwhelmed
Classmate postings to
read
Response comments to
post
Questions still
unanswered
Learners have. . . Instructors have. . .
Too much, too many. . .
Learner postings to read
Response comments to
post
Questions to answer
12. Instructors & Learners Feel Overwhelmed
Compositions w/o
feedback
Grades not yet received
Opportunities to fall
behind
Time in front of the
computer
Learners have. . . Instructors have. . .
Too much, too many. . .
Compositions to read
Grades to determine
Learners AWOL
Time in front of the
computer
15. design and building
• OL instructional designer
• OL technology visionary
• Content author (SME)
• Course builder
• Faculty tech supporter
• Course reviewer/tester
• Course instructor
• Facilitator tech
support
• Student tech support
delivery
16. Online course AUTHORS/DESIGNERS
succeed when they…
• Aren’t restricted by false assumptions
• Experience the online student experience
• Are trained in online pedagogy
• Are trained in using the LMS
• Have clear standards and guidelines
• Are part of a community of designers
• Have help with technology issues
17. Online course BUILDERS
succeed when they…
• Are trained in using the LMS
• Are trained in page creation
• Are given clear standards and guidelines
• Are given well-designed template courses
• Are given sample page templates
• Have help with technology issues
• Are part of a community of developers
18. Online course INSTRUCTORS
succeed when they…
• Aren’t restricted by false assumptions
• Understand the online student experience
• Are trained in online facilitation pedagogy
• Are trained in using the LMS
• Have clear standards and guidelines
• Are part of a community of facilitators
• Have help with technology issues
All these, PLUS have
let their content be their voice,
and don’t try to type itinto discussions to teach it.
19. Why not… Just Do It?
Planning is important,
what you want to accomplish, how
you’ll do it
Winging it isn’t recommended,
neither is reinventing the wheel
20. What Are the Solutions?
Control the time and energy
you and learners spend
manipulating the course
and
Use that time and energy
for learning
21. Online Course Standards (QM)
• Course Overview, Introduction
• Learning Objectives (competencies)
• Assessment and Measurement
• Instructional Materials
• Course Activities and Learner Interaction
• Course Technology
• Learner Support
• Accessibility and Usability
22. Create & Control Purposeful Virtual Spaces
An obvious place for everything and
everything in its obvious place
– Structure, order, and detailed
information comforts learners that
you’ve planned and prepared for them
– Limit learners’ choices to just those they
need
– Display links to all major areas on all
pages
24. Let the Content be Your Voice
• Put in time and energy in advance
composing the course content and. . .
• Save time and energy while facilitating
during the course
or, said another way:
• Say everything you want to say
using your voice in the content and. . .
• Use your postings for facilitation and
meaningful feedback*
25. Provide Overview Information. . .
– Course overview
– Learning goals
– Grading policies
– Assessment rubrics
– Assignment & due dates
checklist
– Table describing course
sections and usage
– Table describing usage of
tech tools
– Policies and procedures
– Weekly timeline
– Schedule of meetings
– Weekly activities summary
– Communications plan
Provide everything learners
ever wanted to know
and shouldn’t have to ask
26. Provide Overview Information. . .
Describe your course design, practices, and
role
– Purposeful virtual spaces
– Scheduled asynchronous communication
philosophy
– Learning through collaboration and interaction
– Your role as guide
– And write it all using a personal, friendly tone
27. Consider Making A Video* Introduction
Include these essential characteristics:
•An appropriate personable welcome and tone
•A descriptive overview of the week's purpose and main
themes
•Details related to activities, timelines, rubrics, and
assessment tools
•Suggestions for how to approach the week or activities
•Recommendations and reminders
•Ensure it’s fully accessible (captioned/transcript)
* or audio
28. Provide Expectations, Rubrics,
and Guidelines for Success. . .
Provide detailed requirements for each
activity
– Number of postings
– Word-length of compositions
– Levels of criteria
– Examples of exemplary work*
– Milestones and due dates
– Due dates
29. Provide Expectations, Rubrics,
and Guidelines for Success. . .
Rubric for Participation
What’s expected of you in this course
– Communicate regularly
Characteristics of Excellent Discussion
Contributions
Examples of Excellent Quality
Discussion Contributions
32. Provide Answers. . .
Answering questions requires time!
• Provide info on how learners find answers to
questions
– Assign practice on how/where to ask questions
– Describe the two main types of Q&A
• Tech questions
• Assignment clarification questions
33. Provide Answers. . .
Provide two discussion forums:
1. “Ask a Tech Question”
2. “Ask an Assignment Clarification
Question”
Answer questions only in appropriate space and
only once
• Link from other discussions back to the specific
answer
• Assign, advertise, remind
• Include instructions on how to search forums
34. Provide Answers. . .
Never let an answer fade away. . .
Capture and reuse your answers
– Take weekly notes-for-next-time
– Build and add to your overviews,
instructions, FAQs
35. Detail, Detail, Detail Your Assignments
• Break multi-part activities into separate
assignments
• Create a predictable set of recurring document
sub-sections
– Activity Overview
– Learning Objectives
– Assignment Details
– Expectations and Rubrics
– Tech Instructions
• Use bullets, numbering, and visuals*
• Link to longer text and materials
36. Control Asynchronous Discussion Threads
• Give each topic its own separate forum
• Limit simple discussion threads to one week
• Break up discussions/interactions with sequential
deadlines
• Provide an on-going social forum
• Provide a weekly “Let’s Talk about this Week”
Keep all communications in the course
and out of email!
37. Manage New Postings
• Learn, teach, and use tech tools
– “Read next new message”
– “Sort by date”
• Require new subjects for each posting
39. Let the Learners Facilitate
Remember: Let the content be your voice
– Design activities to remove yourself from the middle
of discussions
– Clearly state you’ll observe from the side
– Teach techniques and assign facilitators to guide
discussions
– Model but don’t dominate
– Don’t summarize*
– Yes, you still have to read all new postings regularly
40. Let the Learners Provide Feedback. . .
• Design activities to remove yourself from routine
feedback
• Assign sharing and critiques of classmates’
compositions
• Provide learners with rubrics for consistency
• Provide examples to model how to critique and
provide feedback
• Assess and grade learners’ feedback and
critiquing efforts
42. Let the Learners Assess. . .
Design collaborative projects
where team members decide
and divide allotted total points
– Clearly explain the teammates will divvy up
total points among members
– Provide scoring rubrics for consistency
– Provide teams with additional time for grading
44. Design for Feedback/Assessment Efficiency. . .
• Design feedback forms based on rubrics for each
week’s graded activities
• Include feedback on individual participation in
discussions
• Fill in forms as you routinely read learners’
postings
• Record personal references, quotes as you read
• Weekly, send completed feedback to each learner
45. Design for Feedback/Assessment Efficiency
• Create and actively maintain a
feedback phrasing database
• Compose, record, and reuse
predictable boilerplate phrasing
• Organize by week/lesson/activity
46. Schedule Routines for Improved Future Efficiency...
Keep daily/weekly “Notes for Next Time”
– Make notes of ideas for improvements, corrections, better
preparation, clarity of phrasing, additional detail*
– Note where learners stumbled, were confused, performed
disappointingly
– Modify assignments — reorder, break apart, or combine
– How the pace needs slowing down, moving more quickly
– Add to FAQ and overviews the info resulting from learners’
questions
– Results of surveys
47. Schedule Routines for Improved Future Efficiency. . .
Pre-course tasks
• Communication
• Course personalization
To-Do’s in preparation for
next week
• Announcement topics
• Discussions
To-Do’s for current week
• Overview of events
• Facilitation tasks by activity
• Trends/problems to watch for
• Timelines, milestones,
due dates
• Feedback/assessment to-do’s
• Forms for each activity
• Things to change next time
Develop a Detailed “How to Teach My Course
Script”
48. Structure and Control Provide Freedom
• Provide information and “voice” in the content
• Design activities for interactivity between learners
• Step aside and let your learners facilitate,
critique, and assess
• Streamline your facilitation and assessment
routines
53. Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Principle I:
Provide Multiple Means of Representation (the
“what” of learning)
Principle II:
Provide Multiple Means of Action and Expression
(the “how” of learning)
Principle III:
Provide Multiple Means of Engagement (the
“why” of learning)
http://www.udlcenter.org/
54.
55. Accessibility:
OCR’s Operational Definition
“those with a disability are able to
acquire the same information and
engage in the same interactions —
and within the same time frame —
as those without disabilities.”
OCR Compliance Review 11-11-2128, 06121583,
paraphrased from 11-13-5001, 10122118, 11-11-6002
56. Common OCR Findings*
Lack of alternative text on all images
Documents not posted in an accessible
format
Lack of captions on all videos and the
inability to operate video controls using
assistive technology
Improperly structured data tables
57. Common OCR Findings
Improperly formatted and labeled form
fields
Improper contrast between background
and foreground colors
Frames not titled with text that facilitates
frame identification and navigation
58.
59. Rose & Smith Associates
Raymond Rose
ray@rose-smith.com
512.791.3100
Presentation slides on this topic are available at:
http://www.slideshare.net/RaymondRose
And at my blog:
http://rmrose.blogspot.com
Contact Information
Editor's Notes
Envisioned, created, implemented Virtual High School
Perfected a 26-week oTPD program: teachers converted and created courses
Academic Advisory Board
Concord Consortium DaTOC
6-week oTPD course
PBS, Teacherline
co-authored an award-winning OL course on how to facilitate OL
Member of Design Team
Iowa State TEGiVS (Teacher Education Goes into Virtual Schools) FIPSE project
Designed, developed, and co-facilitated two semester-long of online courses for an:
Eight University collaboration:
UNC Berkely; Arizona State University; North Carolina Central University; Norfolk State University; Penn State University; The Department of Education in Technology and Science at Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
UNC Wilmington, Watson School of Ed, created a three-year online and hybrid TPD program
LEARN NC
Created Standards for course design and facilitation
Authored, designed, and created 6-week Online Teacher Preparation Course
Authored, designed, created, and facilitated 6-week Online Assessment Course
University of North Texas, Lifelong Education @ Desktop project
Work with dozens of SMEs (subject matter experts), teaching them: to develop their OL voice, how to convert their knowledge into OL continuing education courses, both self-paced and scheduled-facilitated
LMS
We’ve worked with numerous LMS, like:
Lotus Notes
Blackboard
FirstClass
Desire2Learn
WebCT
Moodle
Including transitioning large-scale installations from one to another
And advising on which best suits a program’s needs
Recommend you pickup a copy of Essential Elements
quickly, show of hands: want to know: > = More than
Talk with your neighbors – preferred learning style. If possible, find someone with a different style. In future discussion they will be helpful.
This is about LEARNING, which is from the students’ perspective
The myths say that:
OL is inferior, easier, provide little real learning, are lonely, and require F2F events to work.
The research disagrees with these. More on that in a minute.
[page 1 of 2 myths]
Talk with neighbor – how do those myths and realities connect with your experiences?
These are most of the essential roles in our model.
Once you’ve planned your program, there are three action phases:
Design, building, delivery
We’ve combined the design and building phases because the roles all contribute during those two.
Notice the delivery phase is much simpler.
Terms
It’s difficult to pick meaningful terms because terms mean different things to different people.
OL instructional designer
Someone who understands OL pedagogy, OL activities, and assessments
OL technology visionary
Someone who understands and can suggest a reasonable technology to best teach and assess a topic:
Discussions, wikis, games, presentations, videos, reports, team projects
Content author
The content writer, the SME, subject matter expert
Course builder
The page builder, the LMS course designer
Faculty tech supporter
Someone who knows the technology
Course reviewer/tester
Peer reviewers who verify the course meets standards
Course facilitator
This is the person who, on a daily basis, manages the course by observing that the course and students are functioning as intended, facilitates discussions, answers questions, assesses learning, provides feedback.
Facilitator tech support and Student tech support
Tho the facilitator may do student support, they still need support
Could be the same person doing both all tech support
Again, folks can take on multiple roles based on their skills and interests.
Authors and course designers have to:
Separate the realities from the myths
Believe that OL can be, at a minimum, as good as F2F
That understanding occurs when you participate in our online professional development course
Know in advance what criteria to meet
They need help to make it as simple and easy as possible
Do it together as a team
And there’s a mechanism in place to share their learnings
Builders are different than authors and lesson designers
They have to know the technology
They need clear standards
They need help to make it as simple and easy as possible
They need templates
For a consistent look and feel
So they don’t recreate the wheel in every course
There is a mechanism in place to share all learnings
These are the same factors for success as the authors and course designers
In addition to:
Facilitators need to be trained in methods of how to facilitate
And there’s a mechanism in place to share their learnings
Plus, they need to NOT try to post, post, post responses to every students’ postings
Our secret solution to that is:
The “teaching” of a course,(i.e., the information that F2F teachers tell students in a F2F classroom) ALL goes into the text, not into on-the-fly discussion postings.
*Posting by the instructor may kill discussion – watch to see what your postings do
Casual, Accessibility, script,
Examples are important – especially those identified as MODEL examples
Talk about experience with Rubrics – do you use them, if so how/when/where?
*Reference UDL multiple representations
* Unless want to wrap up the discussion…
* If you’re the course designer – require this info from instructors weekly – so you can make the course better.
What are your take-aways?
Back to Learning style – do you teach from your learning style? How can you incorporate UDL concepts into your teaching?
* QM standard 8 does not guarantee or imply meeting the legal accessibility requirements