Fossil Hominins: From Australopithecus to Homo
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Fossil Hominins: From Australopithecus to Homo



Compares the Fossil Hominins from Australopthecus afarensis to Homo Sapiens

Compares the Fossil Hominins from Australopthecus afarensis to Homo Sapiens



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



5 Embeds 209 116 76 12 4 1


Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Fossil Hominins: From Australopithecus to Homo Fossil Hominins: From Australopithecus to Homo Presentation Transcript

  • Fossil Hominins From Australopithecus to Homo
  • Model of Human Evolution: Australopithecus to Homo
    • Australopithecus afarensis to A. africanus : Gracile Australopithecines
    • Paranthropus robustus and boisei: Robust Australopithecines—Dead end?
    • A. africanus to Homo habilis : Rise of tool manufacture?
    • H. habilis to H. erectus: Global spread; increased tool assemblage
    • H. erectus to H. sapiens: Tool specialization and population explosion
    • H. neanderthalensis: Dead end?
  • Fossil Hominins: General Trends
    • Large bulbous cranium
    • Short face compared to ape
    • Vertical carriage of head
    • Hands and Forelimbs Adapted to Tool Making and Use
    • Bipedal Structure of Postcranial Skeleton
  • Fossil Trends: Encephalization (Cranial Capacity Increase)
    • A. afarensis: 390-500 cc; av. 440 cc
    • A. africanus: 435-530 cc; av. 450 cc
    • A./P robustus: 520 cc, one specimen
    • A.P. boisei: 500-530 cc; av. 515 cc.
    • H. habilis: 500-800 cc; av. 680 cc.
    • H. erectus: 750-1250 cc; av. 1000 cc
    • Neanderthal: 1300-1750 cc. av: 1450
    • H. (s.) sapiens: 900-2350 cc. av. 1400
  • Fossil Trends: Forelimbs and Hands
    • Shortened forelimb
    • Hands (manipulation, not locomotion)
    • Enlarged thumb
    • Straight, noncurved finger
    • Enhanced finger sensitivity
  • Fossil Hominins: General Trends--Bipedalism
    • S-shaped vertebrae (backbone)
    • Short, wide, bowl-shaped pelvis
    • Femoral head (ball of femur at pelvis) angled and strengthened
    • Lengthened hindlimb
    • Angle of knee: femur “slopes” to pelvis
    • Platform (arched) structure of foot
    • Nonopposable big toe; toes not curved
  • Lucy ( Australopithecus afarensis ) and Us (Homo sapiens)
    • Note the Following:
    • Shorter (3’6”)
    • Longer arms
    • Curved fingers
    • Shorter lower legs
    • Greater prognathism
    • Sloped forehead
    • Smaller cranial capacity
    • What are the Similarities?
    • Hint: it’s all related to bipedalism
  • Bipedalism: A. afarensis and H. sapiens compared, Fine Points
  • When We Became Bipedal (According to Gary Larson)
    • “ Hey! Look! No hands!”
    • (Does he look like Lucy to you. . .?)
  • Gracile and Robust Australopithecines
    • For A. africanus (top), note:
    • Somewhat rounder skull
    • No Sagittal crest
    • Prognathous jaw
    • For Paranthropus boisei, note:
    • Sagittal crest (ate a lot of veggies)
    • Massive lower jaw (mandible)
    • Flatter face
    • Massive cheek bones (zygomatic arch)
  • Summary of Australopithecines
    • Cranial capacity increased marginally
    • All australopithecines had
    • Sloping foreheads
    • Prominent brow ridges
    • Prognathous lower face and jaws
    • Bipedal postcranial skeletons
    • Robust forms probably were dead ends
    • Graciles likely evolved toward Homo .
  • Australopithecus and Homo Compared—Frontal View
    • Left: A. africanus
    • Right: H. habilis
    • Note:
    • Different Cranial Capacities
    • Brow Ridge Size
  • Australopithecus and Homo Compared—Side View
    • Top: A. africanus
    • Bottom: H. habilis
    • Compare:
    • Mass of Jaws
    • Size of Crania
    • Prognathism
  • Postorbital Constriction
    • Left: Homo erectus
    • Right: Australopithecus africanus
    • Note the narrower constriction of A. africanus’s postorbital constriction than that of H. erectus
  • Homo habilis: The First Known Toolmaker
    • Note the following:
    • Face is much flatter
    • Reduced brow ridge (supraorbital torus)
    • Larger cranial capacity (680 cc.)
    • Toolmaking Technique
    • Hammerstone used to strike
    • A core (lump of stone) to knap
    • A Flake (stone chip)
    • Note: Stone has to be crystalline (so it will fracture predictably)
  • Homo habilis According to Gary Larson
  • Australopithecines and Homo Compared I
    • Cranial capacity
    • Australopithecines: 400-530 cc
    • Homo: 500-2300
    • Maximum braincase width
    • Australopithecines: low on skull
    • Homo: near top
    • Postorbital constriction Australopithecines: marked Homo: moderate to slight
  • Australopithecines and Homo Compared II
    • Supraorbital torus (brow ridge)
    • Australopithecines: large to moderate
    • Homo: large to slight
    • Zygomatic arch
    • Australopithecines: large, flaring
    • Homo: small, not flaring
  • Australopithecines and Homo Compared III
    • Facial size relative to brain case
    • Australopithecines: large
    • Homo: small
    • Jaw
    • A: Massive and prognathic; no chin
    • H: Not massive
    • Prognathism slight to nonexistent;
    • Chin present in sapients
    • Molars and premolars
    • Australopithecines: large; afarensis with diastema
    • Homo: small
  • Australopithecines and Homo Habilis Compared: Skulls
    • General trends
    • Encephalization: Cranial capacity increases
    • Dentition: Cheek teeth are reduced
    • Sagittal Crest (where chewing muscles attach)
    • A./P. robustus and boisei: pronounced
    • A. africanus: sagittal keel or absent
    • H. habilis: absent
  • Australopithecines and Homo Habilis Compared: Skull/Face
    • Braincase
    • A./P. robustus/boisei: less rounded
    • A. africanus: more rounded
    • H. habilis: most rounded of the three
    • Zygomatic arch
    • A./P. robustus/boisei: very pronounced
    • A. africanus: less pronounced
    • H. habilis: far less pronounced than the australopithecines
  • Homo habilis: Hands and Feet
    • Hands
    • Curvature of finger bones are apelike, indicate powerful grip (arboreal)
    • Indications of greater manipulative skill
    • Larger blood supply to hand than earlier hominids
    • Evidence of greater nerve supply
    • Feet: existing fragments indicate modern form:
    • Remains lacked toes
  • Tool Traditions: Oldowan
    • Named after Olduvai Gorge
    • Among the finds at Olduvai:
    • Side chopper, a core tool
    • Several flake tools, including
    • End scraper
    • Side scraper
    • Burin
    • Utilized flakes of unknown function
    • Belongs to Lower Paleolithic
  • Manufacturing Choppers
    • Procedure
    • Knapper strikes a spherical piece of stone
    • Flake falls off opposite side
    • Tool flipped over and procedure repeated
    • Several blows create a cutting edge
    • Requirements reflect Intelligence
    • Planning and foreknowledge of design
    • Knowledge of breakage pattern of rock
    • Hand-eye coordination
  • Oldowan Tradition
    • End chopper
    • Heavy duty scraper
    • Flake scraper
    • Spheroid Hammerstone
    • Chopper
    • Horn core tool or digger
  • Homo habilis and Homo erectus
    • Compared to H. habilis, H erectus had:
    • Larger brain (1000 cc vs 680 cc average)
    • Forehead flatter, less sloping
    • More rounded occipital torus
    • endocasts indicate hemispheric asymmetry
    • Homo erectus and Homo sapiens
  • Homo erectus or ergaster
    • Note:
    • Apelike but larger cranium
    • Postcranial Skeleton
    • Vertebrae: S Shaped
    • Ribcage: Not funnel shaped, now like ours
    • Pelvis: Bowl shaped
    • Angle of Thighbone
  • Homo erectus and Homo Sapiens: Cranium (Braincase)
    • Forehead (Frontal)
    • H. erectus: sloping; low and flat
    • H. sapiens: vertical, indicating frontal lobe
    • Supraorbital torus (brow ridge)
    • H. erectus: prominent--extending as a bar
    • H. sapiens: slight or absent
    • Occipital torus:
    • H. erectus: present
    • H. sapiens: slight or absent
  • Homo erectus and Homo sapiens: Cranium and Face
    • Sagittal keel
    • H. erectus: present; vestige of crest?
    • H. sapiens: slight or absent
    • Postorbital constriction
    • H. erectus: pronounced
    • H. sapiens: slight or nonexistent
  • Homo erectus and Homo sapiens: Facial Skeleton
    • Facial skeletion
    • H. erectus: Relatively large, with large orbits and nasal opening
    • H. sapiens: Relatively small, with small orbits and nasal opening
    • Prognathism (jutting jaw)
    • H. erectus: Pronounced
    • H. sapiens: minimal or nonexistent
  • Homo erectus and Homo sapiens skulls
    • Compare:
    • Brow ridges (supraorbital tori)
    • Prognathism
    • Constriction behind eye sockets (postorbital constriction)
    • Presence versus absence of chin
  • Tool Traditions: Acheulean
    • Named after St. Acheul
    • Characteristics of Acheulean handaxe
    • Bifacial: both sides knapped
    • Symmetrical in breadth
    • Shaped to a point on one end
    • The edge is thin and sharp
    • Broad end is curved, but edge is still sharp
    • Part of Lower Paleolithic
  • Acheulean Axe as “Swiss Army Knife”; Abbevillean variation
    • Swiss Army Rock?
    • Sharp tip: used for piercing
    • Thin edge: used for cutting (hide or meat off bone)
    • Broad end: used for chopping or scraping
    • Abbevillean Variation:
    • Bifacial, like the Acheulean
    • Not quite so symmetrical
    • Olduvai specimen: transitional type?
  • Manufacturing Acheulean Handaxes
    • A demanding task
    • Symmetrical, finely shaped
    • Dozens of flakes removed, from 25 to 75
    • Each flake blow must be precisely positioned
    • Core must be turned over again and again
    • to maintain symmetry
    • to keep edge straight
    • All the exterior rind ( cortex ) was removed
  • Abbevillian and Acheulean Handaxes
    • Left: Abbevillian. Note asymmetry, rough retouch
    • Right: Acheulean. Note symmetry, fine retouch
  • Homo heidelbergensis or “Archaic” Homo sapiens
    • Left: Skull. Note heavy brow ridge, prognathism
    • Right: Mandible. Note arc-like dental arcade, absence of diastema, absence of chin
  • Manufacturing Levallois Cores and Flakes
    • Knappers
    • Draw outline of flake on stone module
    • Strikes flake of desired shape
    • Requires knowledge of breakage pattern of rock
    • Prepares rock beforehand to control how rock breaks when struck
    • Ensure right shape (e.g. cutting, perforation, piercing) is struck
  • Levallois Flake and Flaking Technique
  • Homo neanderthalensis : Skeleton
    • Left: Homo neanderthalensis
    • Right : Homo sapiens
    • Compare
    • Relative thickness of bones
    • Breadth of ribcages
    • Size of skulls
  • Homo neanderthalensis: Cranium
    • Left: H. neanderthalensis : note larger cranial size, occipital bun, prognathism, brow ridge
    • Right : H. sapiens : Note rounded cranium, presence of chin, absence of prognathism and brow ridge
  • Mousterian Tradition
    • Positively identified with Neanderhals
    • Le Moustier, France is a Neanderthal site
    • Belongs to Middle Paleolithic
    • More sophisticated than Oldowan or Acheulean, both Lower Paleolithic
  • Mousterian Tool Assemblage
    • Sample includes Scrapers, Points, and Handaxes
  • Upper Paleolithic: The Great Leap Forward?
    • Probably begins about 50,000 BP
    • Primary Attributes
    • Shift from flake tools to blades
    • Subsistence on greater range of animal and plant species
    • Larger sites
    • Increase of bone, antler, ivory, shell, and other materials for tools
  • Upper Paleolithic: Associated Attributes
    • Associated Attributes
    • Greater use of “imported” goods:
    • raw materials obtainable only from
    • great distances from inhabited sites
    • which suggests trade
    • More elaborate burials, with grave goods
    • Appearance and elaborate use of symbols and works of art.
  • Upper Paleolithic: The Blades
    • Blades begin roughly 40,000 Years BP
    • Comparative efficiency
    • Levallois cores may produce 5 flakes
    • Many more blades could be produced from same core--and with longer cutting edge
    • Unlike other traditions, blade traditions are shorter lived
    • Oldowan: from ca.2.5 m. yrs BP
    • Acheulean: from ca 1.9 m. yrs BP
  • Upper Paleolithic Assemblage
    • Upper Paleolithic Tools (left to right): biconical bone point, Perigordian flint blade, prismatic blade core, Soluterean Willow leaf point, double-row barbed harpoon point (various sites in France)
  • To Sum Up: Representatives of Five Species
    • The species:
    • 1. Australopithecus afarensis
    • 2. Australopithecus africanus
    • 3. Homo habilis
    • 4. Homo erectus
    • 5. Homo neanderthalensis