Scott Edmunds: Data Dissemination in the era of "Big-Data"

Bio-IT World Asia Meeting, 7th June 2012 Scott EdmundsData dissemination in the era of “big data”William Gibson: "Information is the currency of the future world”Sir Tim Berners-Lee: "Data is a precious thing and will last longer than the systemsthemselves” www.gigasciencejournal.com

Is data “the new oil”?1.2 zettabytes (1021) of electronic data generated each year1 DataDeluge?1. Mervis J. U.S. science policy. Agencies rally to tackle big data. Science. 2012 Apr 6;336(6077):22.

Global Sequencing Capacity Data Production 5.6 Tb / day > 1500X of human genome / day Multiple Supercomputing Centers 157 TB Flops 20 TB Memory 14.7 PB Storage

BGI Sequencing Capacity Sequencers Data Production137 Illumina/HiSeq 2000 5.6 Tb / day27 LifeTech/SOLiD 4 > 1500X of human genome / day1 454 GS FLX+ 1372 Illumina iScan Multiple Supercomputing Centers1 Illumina MiSeq 157 TB Flops1 Ion Torrent 20 TB Memory 14.7 PB Storage

Now taking submissions… Large-Scale Data:Journal/Database/Platform In conjunction with:Editor-in-Chief: Laurie Goodman, PhDEditor: Scott Edmunds, PhDAssistant Editor: Alexandra Basford, PhDLead BioCurator: Tam Sneddon, DphilData Platform: Peter Li, PhD www.gigasciencejournal.com

Data-data everywhere?

Data Silo’s Interoperability PaywallsMetadata $ ©

There are many hurdles… ?

There are many hurdles…Technical: too large volumes too heterogeneous no home for many data types too time consumingCultural: inertia no incentives to share unaware of how ?

Technical challenges…Better handling of metadata…Novel tools/formats for data interoperability/handling. Cloud solutions?

Technical challenges… Tools making work more easily reproducible…Interoperability/Ease of use WorkflowsData quality assessment

Technical challenges…More efficient handling of data… Cloud?Do we need to keep everything?Compression?

Cultural challenges…

Data Re-useEffort($) Usability

Need to lower the hurdles…Effort($) Usability

Better incentives?Effort($) Usability

Incentives/creditCredit where credit is overdue:“One option would be to provide researchers who release data topublic repositories with a means of accreditation.”“An ability to search the literature for all online papers that used aparticular data set would enable appropriate attribution for thosewho share. “Nature Biotechnology 27, 579 (2009)Prepublication data sharing(Toronto International Data Release Workshop)“Data producers benefit from creating a citable reference, as it canlater be used to reflect impact of the data sets.”Nature 461, 168-170 (2009)

Datacitation: Datacite and DOIsDigital Object Identifiers (DOIs)  offer a solution Mostly widely used identifier for Dataset scientific articles Yancheva et al (2007). Analyses on Researchers, authors, publishers sediment of Lake Maar. PANGAEA. know how to use them doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.587840 Put datasets on the same playing field as articles “increase acceptance of research data as Aims to: legitimate, citable contributions to the scholarly record”. “data generated in the course of research are just as valuable to the ongoing academic discourse as papers and monographs”.

Datacitation: Datacite and DOIs Central metadata repository:• >1 million entries to date• Stability• Data discoverability• Open & harvestable• Potential to track & credit use

Data publishing/DOI New journal format combines standard manuscript publication with an extensive database to host all associated data, and integrated tools.  Data hosting will follow standard funding agency and community guidelines. DOI assignment available for submitted data to allow ease of finding and citing datasets, as well as for citation tracking. www.gigasciencejournal.com

Data Publishingwww.gigaDB.org

BGI Datasets Get DOI®sInvertebrate Many released pre-publication…Ant PLANTS- Florida carpenter ant Chinese cabbage Vertebrates- Jerdon’s jumping ant Cucumber Giant panda Macaque- Leaf-cutter ant Foxtail millet - Chinese rhesusRoundworm Pigeonpea - Crab-eatingSchistosoma Potato Mini-PigSilkworm Sorghum Naked mole rat PenguinHuman - Emperor penguinAsian individual (YH) - Adelie penguin- DNA Methylome Pigeon, domestic- Genome Assembly Polar bear- Transcriptome Sheep doi:10.5524/100004Cancer (14TB) Tibetan antelopeAncient DNA Microbe- Saqqaq Eskimo E. Coli O104:H4 TY-2482- Aboriginal Australian Cell-Line Chinese Hamster Ovary

For data citation to work, needs:• Proven utility/potential user base.• Acceptance/inclusion by journals.• Data+Citation: inclusion in the references.• Tracking by citation indexes.• Usage of the metrics by the community…

Data+Citation: inclusion in the references

• Data submitted to NCBI databases:- Raw data SRA:SRA046843- Assemblies of 3 strains Genbank:AHAO00000000-AHAQ00000000- SNPs dbSNP:1056306- CNVs-- InDels SV } dbVAR:nstd63• Submission to public databases complemented by its citable form in GigaDB (doi:10.5524/100012).

In the references…

Is the DOI…

And now in Nature Biotech…

Datacitation: tracking? DataCite metadata in harvestable form (OAI-PMH)Plans in 2012 to link central metadata repository with WoS - Will finally track and credit use! To be continued…

Final step: open licensing

Our first DOI:To maximize its utility to the research community and aid those fightingthe current epidemic, genomic data is released here into the public domainunder a CC0 license. Until the publication of research papers on theassembly and whole-genome analysis of this isolate we would ask you tocite this dataset as:Li, D; Xi, F; Zhao, M; Liang, Y; Chen, W; Cao, S; Xu, R; Wang, G; Wang, J; Zhang,Z; Li, Y; Cui, Y; Chang, C; Cui, C; Luo, Y; Qin, J; Li, S; Li, J; Peng, Y; Pu, F; Sun,Y; Chen,Y; Zong, Y; Ma, X; Yang, X; Cen, Z; Zhao, X; Chen, F; Yin, X; Song,Y ;Rohde, H; Li, Y; Wang, J; Wang, J and the Escherichia coli O104:H4 TY-2482isolate genome sequencing consortium (2011)Genomic data from Escherichia coli O104:H4 isolate TY-2482. BGI Shenzhen.doi:10.5524/100001http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100001 To the extent possible under law, BGI Shenzhen has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to Genomic Data from the 2011 E. coli outbreak. This work is published from: China.

“The way that the genetic data of the 2011 E. coli strain were disseminatedglobally suggests a more effective approach for tackling public healthproblems. Both groups put their sequencing data on the Internet, so scientiststhe world over could immediately begin their own analysis of the bugsmakeup. BGI scientists also are using Twitter to communicate their latestfindings.”“German scientists and their colleagues at the Beijing Genomics Institute in China havebeen working on uncovering secrets of the outbreak. BGI scientists revised their draftgenetic sequence of the E. coli strain and have been sharing their data with dozens ofscientists around the world as a way to "crowdsource" this data. By publishing their datapublicy and freely, these other scientists can have a look at the genetic structure, and tryto sort it out for themselves.”

Downstream consequences:1. Therapeutics (primers, antimicrobials) 2. Platform Comparisons (Loman et al., Nature Biotech 2012)3. Speed/legal-freedom“Last summer, biologist Andrew Kasarskis was eager to help decipher the genetic origin of the Escherichia colistrain that infected roughly 4,000 people in Germany between May and July. But he knew it that might take daysfor the lawyers at his company — Pacific Biosciences — to parse the agreements governing how his team coulduse data collected on the strain. Luckily, one team had released its data under a Creative Commons licence thatallowed free use of the data, allowing Kasarskis and his colleagues to join the international research effort andpublish their work without wasting time on legal wrangling.”

The era of the data consumer?

The era of the data consumer??

The era of the data consumer?Free access to data – but analysis hubs/nodes for will form around it ?

GDSAP: Genomic Data Submission and Analytical platform Big data from theData, Data, Data… “Sequencing Oil Field” Data Modeling Pipeline design Tin-Lap Lee, CUHK Validation Commercial applications “Apps”

GDSAP: Genomic Data Submission and Analytical platform

GDSAP: Genomic Data Submission and Analytical platform mirror/open platform

Papers in the era of big-data $1000 genome = million $ peer-review? To review: (>6TBp, >1500 datasets) S3 = $15,000 EC2 (BLASTx) = $500,000Source: Folker Meyer/Wilkening et al. 2009, CLUSTER09. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing and Workshops

Papers in the era of big-data goal: Executable Research Objects Citable DOI

Papers in the era of big-data goal: Executable Research ObjectsStage 1: Wilson GA, Dhami P, Feber A, Cortázar D, Suzuki Y, Schulz R, Schär P, Beck S: Resources for methylome analysis suitable for gene knockout studies of potential epigenome modifiers. GigaScience 2012, 1:3. (in press) GigaDB hosting all data + tools (84GB total): doi:10.5524/100035 + Partial (~80%) integration of workflow into our data platform. (all the data processing steps, but not the enrichment analysis)Stage 2: Papers fully integrating all data + all workflows in our platform.

Papers in the era of big-data Interested in Reproducible Research?Take part in our session on: “Cloud and workflows for reproducible bioinformatics”Submit to:• Rapid review/Open Access/High-visibility• Article Processing Charge covered by BGI• Hosting of any test datasets/workflows in GigaDB

Thanks to:Laurie Goodman Alexandra BasfordTam Sneddon Peter LiTin-Lap Lee (CUHK) Qiong Luo (HKUST) scott@gigasciencejournal.comContact us: editorial@gigasciencejournal.com @gigascience Follow us: facebook.com/GigaScience blogs.openaccesscentral.com/blogs/gigablog/ www.gigasciencejournal.com

http://blogs.openaccesscentral.com	351
http://blogs.biomedcentral.com	16
http://us-w1.rockmelt.com	9
http://w16.blogs.openaccesscentral.com	1

Scott Edmunds: Data Dissemination in the era of "Big-Data"

by GigaScience, BGI Hong Kong on Jun 06, 2012

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

4 Embeds 377

Statistics

Scott Edmunds: Data Dissemination in the era of "Big-Data" Presentation Transcript