Scott Edmunds: Data Dissemination in the era of "Big-Data"

932 views

Published on

Scott Edmunds talk at the ICG Europe meeting in Copenhagen on Data Dissemination in the era of "Big-Data", May 24th 2012

Published in: Technology, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Scott Edmunds: Data Dissemination in the era of "Big-Data"

  1. 1. ICG-Europe Meeting, 24th May 2012 Scott EdmundsData dissemination in the era of “big data”William Gibson: "Information is the currency of the future world”Sir Tim Berners-Lee: "Data is a precious thing and will last longer than the systemsthemselves” www.gigasciencejournal.com Image: s-ariga cc/Flickr
  2. 2. Is data “the new oil”?1.2 zettabytes (1021) of electronic data generated each year1 DataDeluge?1. Mervis J. U.S. science policy. Agencies rally to tackle big data. Science. 2012 Apr 6;336(6077):22.
  3. 3. Global Sequencing Capacity Data Production 5.6 Tb / day > 1500X of human genome / day Multiple Supercomputing Centers 157 TB Flops 20 TB Memory 14.7 PB Storage
  4. 4. BGI Sequencing Capacity Sequencers Data Production137 Illumina/HiSeq 2000 5.6 Tb / day27 LifeTech/SOLiD 4 > 1500X of human genome / day1 454 GS FLX+ 1372 Illumina iScan Multiple Supercomputing Centers1 Illumina MiSeq 157 TB Flops1 Ion Torrent 20 TB Memory 14.7 PB Storage
  5. 5. Now taking submissions… Large-Scale Data:Journal/Database/Platform In conjunction with:Editor-in-Chief: Laurie Goodman, PhDEditor: Scott Edmunds, PhDAssistant Editor: Alexandra Basford, PhDLead BioCurator: Tam Sneddon, DphilData Platform: Peter Li, PhD www.gigasciencejournal.com
  6. 6. Data-data everywhere?
  7. 7. Data Silo’s Interoperability PaywallsMetadata $ ©
  8. 8. There are many hurdles… ?
  9. 9. There are many hurdles…Technical: too large volumes too heterogeneous no home for many data types too time consumingCultural: inertia no incentives to share unaware of how ?
  10. 10. Technical challenges…Better handling of metadata…Novel tools/formats for data interoperability/handling. Cloud solutions?
  11. 11. Technical challenges… Tools making work more easily reproducible…Interoperability/Ease of use WorkflowsData quality assessment
  12. 12. Technical challenges…More efficient handling of data… Cloud?Do we need to keep everything?Compression?
  13. 13. Cultural challenges…
  14. 14. Data Re-useEffort($) Usability
  15. 15. Need to lower the hurdles…Effort($) Usability
  16. 16. Better incentives?Effort($) Usability
  17. 17. Incentives/creditCredit where credit is overdue:“One option would be to provide researchers who release data topublic repositories with a means of accreditation.”“An ability to search the literature for all online papers that used aparticular data set would enable appropriate attribution for thosewho share. “Nature Biotechnology 27, 579 (2009)Prepublication data sharing(Toronto International Data Release Workshop)“Data producers benefit from creating a citable reference, as it canlater be used to reflect impact of the data sets.”Nature 461, 168-170 (2009)
  18. 18. Datacitation: Datacite and DOIsDigital Object Identifiers (DOIs)  offer a solution Mostly widely used identifier for Dataset scientific articles Yancheva et al (2007). Analyses on Researchers, authors, publishers sediment of Lake Maar. PANGAEA. know how to use them doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.587840 Put datasets on the same playing field as articles “increase acceptance of research data as Aims to: legitimate, citable contributions to the scholarly record”. “data generated in the course of research are just as valuable to the ongoing academic discourse as papers and monographs”.
  19. 19. Datacitation: Datacite and DOIs Central metadata repository:• >1 million entries to date• Stability• Data discoverability• Open & harvestable• Potential to track & credit use
  20. 20. Data publishing/DOI New journal format combines standard manuscript publication with an extensive database to host all associated data, and integrated tools.  Data hosting will follow standard funding agency and community guidelines. DOI assignment available for submitted data to allow ease of finding and citing datasets, as well as for citation tracking. www.gigasciencejournal.com
  21. 21. Data Publishingwww.gigaDB.org
  22. 22. BGI Datasets Get DOI®sInvertebrate Many released pre-publication…Ant PLANTS- Florida carpenter ant Chinese cabbage Vertebrates- Jerdon’s jumping ant Cucumber Giant panda Macaque- Leaf-cutter ant Foxtail millet - Chinese rhesusRoundworm Pigeonpea - Crab-eatingSchistosoma Potato Mini-PigSilkworm Sorghum Naked mole rat PenguinHuman - Emperor penguinAsian individual (YH) - Adelie penguin- DNA Methylome Pigeon, domestic- Genome Assembly Polar bear- Transcriptome Sheep doi:10.5524/100004Cancer (14TB) Tibetan antelopeAncient DNA Microbe- Saqqaq Eskimo E. Coli O104:H4 TY-2482- Aboriginal Australian Cell-Line Chinese Hamster Ovary
  23. 23. For data citation to work, needs:• Proven utility/potential user base.• Acceptance/inclusion by journals.• Data+Citation: inclusion in the references.• Tracking by citation indexes.• Usage of the metrics by the community…
  24. 24. Data+Citation: inclusion in the references
  25. 25. • Data submitted to NCBI databases:- Raw data SRA:SRA046843- Assemblies of 3 strains Genbank:AHAO00000000-AHAQ00000000- SNPs dbSNP:1056306- CNVs-- InDels SV } dbGAP:nstd63• Submission to public databases complemented by its citable form in GigaDB.
  26. 26. In the references…
  27. 27. Is the DOI…
  28. 28. And now in Nature Biotech…
  29. 29. Datacitation: tracking? DataCite metadata in harvestable form (OAI-PMH)Plans in 2012 to link central metadata repository with WoS - Will finally track and credit use! To be continued…
  30. 30. Final step: open licensing
  31. 31. Our first DOI:To maximize its utility to the research community and aid those fightingthe current epidemic, genomic data is released here into the public domainunder a CC0 license. Until the publication of research papers on theassembly and whole-genome analysis of this isolate we would ask you tocite this dataset as:Li, D; Xi, F; Zhao, M; Liang, Y; Chen, W; Cao, S; Xu, R; Wang, G; Wang, J;Zhang, Z; Li, Y; Cui, Y; Chang, C; Cui, C; Luo, Y; Qin, J; Li, S; Li, J; Peng, Y;Pu, F; Sun, Y; Chen,Y; Zong, Y; Ma, X; Yang, X; Cen, Z; Zhao, X; Chen, F; Yin, X;Song,Y ; Rohde, H; Li, Y; Wang, J; Wang, J and the Escherichia coli O104:H4 TY-2482 isolate genome sequencing consortium (2011)Genomic data from Escherichia coli O104:H4 isolate TY-2482. BGI Shenzhen.doi:10.5524/100001http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100001 To the extent possible under law, BGI Shenzhen has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to Genomic Data from the 2011 E. coli outbreak. This work is published from: China.
  32. 32. Other consequences: speed/legal-freedom“Last summer, biologist Andrew Kasarskis was eager to help decipher the genetic originof the Escherichia coli strain that infected roughly 4,000 people in Germany betweenMay and July. But he knew it that might take days for the lawyers at his company —Pacific Biosciences — to parse the agreements governing how his team could use datacollected on the strain. Luckily, one team had released its data under a CreativeCommons licence that allowed free use of the data, allowing Kasarskis and hiscolleagues to join the international research effort and publish their work withoutwasting time on legal wrangling.”
  33. 33. The era of the data consumer?
  34. 34. The era of the data consumer??
  35. 35. The era of the data consumer?Free access to data – but analysis hubs/nodes for will form around it ?
  36. 36. GDSAP: Genomic Data Submission and Analytical platform Big data from theData, Data, Data… “Sequencing Oil Field” Data Modeling Pipeline design Tin-Lap Lee, CUHK Validation Commercial applications “Apps”
  37. 37. GDSAP: Genomic Data Submission and Analytical platform
  38. 38. GDSAP: Genomic Data Submission and Analytical platform mirror/open platform
  39. 39. Papers in the era of big-data $1000 genome = million $ peer-review? To review: (>6TBp, >1500 datasets) S3 = $15,000 EC2 (BLASTx) = $500,000Source: Folker Meyer/Wilkening et al. 2009, CLUSTER09. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing and Workshops
  40. 40. Papers in the era of big-data goal: Executable Research Objects Citable DOI
  41. 41. Papers in the era of big-data Interested in Reproducible Research?Take part in our session on: “Cloud and workflows for reproducible bioinformatics”Submit to:• Rapid review/Open Access/High-visibility• Article Processing Charge covered by BGI• Hosting of any test datasets/workflows in GigaDB
  42. 42. Thanks to:Laurie Goodman Alexandra BasfordTam Sneddon/Peter Li Shaoguang LiangTin-Lap Lee (CUHK) Qiong Luo (HKUST) scott@gigasciencejournal.comContact us: editorial@gigasciencejournal.com @gigascienceFollow us: facebook.com/GigaScience blogs.openaccesscentral.com/blogs/gigablog/ www.gigasciencejournal.com

×