SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Second Floor, Fleetbank House
2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX
Telephone : 020 7273 1061
Facsimile : 020 7273 1045
www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/courts-and-tribunals/tribunals/employment-appeals/
Our Reference: UKEATPA/0386/13/LA
Mr Douglas Iain Gardiner
5 Weavern Court
Chippenham
Wilts
SN14 0LU
E-mail & Post
06 June 2013
Dear Sir
Mr D I Gardiner v EXSTO UK Ltd
I am writing with reference to your Notice of Appeal in the above case from the
Decision of an Employment Tribunal sitting at Bristol and promulgated on 21
January 2013.
Under Section 21 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, this Appeal Tribunal
only has jurisdiction to hear appeals from Employment Tribunal Decisions on
questions of law, i.e. where it is argued that the Tribunal made some mistake in its
interpretation or application of the law in reaching its decision. This means that it
is not the function of this Appeal Tribunal to re-hear the facts of a case or to
review an Employment Tribunal’s decision on those facts.
The appeal has been referred to His Honour Judge Peter Clark in accordance with
Rule 3(7) of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993 (as amended) and in his
opinion your Notice of Appeal discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing the
appeal. He states:
It is a cardinal rule of law that claims between the same parties, once finally
determined, cannot be relitigated. The principle of finality of litigation
applies.
The present claims are based on the Appellant’s employment with the
Respondent which ended with his resignation effective on 28 May 2011. He
then brought various claims in the Bristol ET which were dismissed by an
ET chaired by Employment Judge Owen in September 2011. Now he wishes
to revive those claims in these proceedings, adding further claims which
could and should have been raised in the original proceedings. That is not
permissible. Employment Judge Harper was right to strike them out.
For the above reasons the learned Judge considers that this Appeal has no
reasonable prospect of success and that, in accordance with Rule 3(7), no further
action will be taken on it.
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Second Floor, Fleetbank House
2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX
Telephone : 020 7273 1061
Facsimile : 020 7273 1045
www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/courts-and-tribunals/tribunals/employment-appeals/
Your attention is drawn to Rules 3(8) and 3(10) of the Employment Appeal
Tribunal Rules. A copy of Rule 3 is enclosed with this letter.
Yours faithfully
Ms J Johnson
Deputy Registrar
CC: Peninsula Business Services Ltd for the Respondent (Ref: Mr Neil Clowrey)
Bristol Employment Tribunal (ref: 1401745/12,1401756/12 & 1401811/12)

More Related Content

What's hot

20191220 bijoy kumar das vs union of india gauhati hc
20191220 bijoy kumar das vs union of india   gauhati hc20191220 bijoy kumar das vs union of india   gauhati hc
20191220 bijoy kumar das vs union of india gauhati hcsabrangsabrang
 
Inf tribunal ea20170161 (you cant make me)
Inf tribunal ea20170161 (you cant make me)Inf tribunal ea20170161 (you cant make me)
Inf tribunal ea20170161 (you cant make me)Evidence_Complicit
 
AUSTRAC letter of approval June 2016
AUSTRAC letter of approval June 2016AUSTRAC letter of approval June 2016
AUSTRAC letter of approval June 2016Philip Anthon
 
Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...
Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...
Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...Michal
 
Pta refusal ea20170161 r
Pta refusal ea20170161 rPta refusal ea20170161 r
Pta refusal ea20170161 rJohn Smith
 
DR.Mona Part 1 MRCOG
DR.Mona Part 1 MRCOGDR.Mona Part 1 MRCOG
DR.Mona Part 1 MRCOGMona Osman
 
Impacts of Mediation Procedure on Turkish Employment Law
Impacts of Mediation Procedure on Turkish Employment LawImpacts of Mediation Procedure on Turkish Employment Law
Impacts of Mediation Procedure on Turkish Employment LawMelis Buhan Öncel
 
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CICLetter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CICOm Prakash Poddar
 
Sc order 01 mar-2021
Sc order 01 mar-2021Sc order 01 mar-2021
Sc order 01 mar-2021ZahidManiyar
 
Qualifications 2016-11-21(1,83)
Qualifications 2016-11-21(1,83)Qualifications 2016-11-21(1,83)
Qualifications 2016-11-21(1,83)Sivuyile Bukula
 
7 5 julio 2012 - constitutional tribunal admitted lawsuit filed by the cs re...
7  5 julio 2012 - constitutional tribunal admitted lawsuit filed by the cs re...7  5 julio 2012 - constitutional tribunal admitted lawsuit filed by the cs re...
7 5 julio 2012 - constitutional tribunal admitted lawsuit filed by the cs re...Superintendencia de Competencia
 

What's hot (20)

20191220 bijoy kumar das vs union of india gauhati hc
20191220 bijoy kumar das vs union of india   gauhati hc20191220 bijoy kumar das vs union of india   gauhati hc
20191220 bijoy kumar das vs union of india gauhati hc
 
Inf tribunal ea20170161 (you cant make me)
Inf tribunal ea20170161 (you cant make me)Inf tribunal ea20170161 (you cant make me)
Inf tribunal ea20170161 (you cant make me)
 
AUSTRAC letter of approval June 2016
AUSTRAC letter of approval June 2016AUSTRAC letter of approval June 2016
AUSTRAC letter of approval June 2016
 
Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...
Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...
Is the parallel competence set out in regulation 12003 totally clear. case co...
 
Case of stefanica_and_others_v._romania
Case of stefanica_and_others_v._romaniaCase of stefanica_and_others_v._romania
Case of stefanica_and_others_v._romania
 
Pta refusal ea20170161 r
Pta refusal ea20170161 rPta refusal ea20170161 r
Pta refusal ea20170161 r
 
DR.Mona Part 1 MRCOG
DR.Mona Part 1 MRCOGDR.Mona Part 1 MRCOG
DR.Mona Part 1 MRCOG
 
Impacts of Mediation Procedure on Turkish Employment Law
Impacts of Mediation Procedure on Turkish Employment LawImpacts of Mediation Procedure on Turkish Employment Law
Impacts of Mediation Procedure on Turkish Employment Law
 
Part 1 MRCOG result (3)
Part 1 MRCOG result (3)Part 1 MRCOG result (3)
Part 1 MRCOG result (3)
 
35296_gen360
35296_gen36035296_gen360
35296_gen360
 
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CICLetter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC
Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC
 
Renewal-FCRA Certificate
Renewal-FCRA CertificateRenewal-FCRA Certificate
Renewal-FCRA Certificate
 
PPT-MOLDOVA-2-Third-SIGMA-ENP-East-public-procurement-conference-November-2019
PPT-MOLDOVA-2-Third-SIGMA-ENP-East-public-procurement-conference-November-2019PPT-MOLDOVA-2-Third-SIGMA-ENP-East-public-procurement-conference-November-2019
PPT-MOLDOVA-2-Third-SIGMA-ENP-East-public-procurement-conference-November-2019
 
Ipcc 29 august 2017 redact
Ipcc   29 august 2017 redactIpcc   29 august 2017 redact
Ipcc 29 august 2017 redact
 
Sc order 01 mar-2021
Sc order 01 mar-2021Sc order 01 mar-2021
Sc order 01 mar-2021
 
Qualifications 2016-11-21(1,83)
Qualifications 2016-11-21(1,83)Qualifications 2016-11-21(1,83)
Qualifications 2016-11-21(1,83)
 
Exhibit a 7
Exhibit a 7Exhibit a 7
Exhibit a 7
 
Email to psd and response
Email to psd and responseEmail to psd and response
Email to psd and response
 
7 5 julio 2012 - constitutional tribunal admitted lawsuit filed by the cs re...
7  5 julio 2012 - constitutional tribunal admitted lawsuit filed by the cs re...7  5 julio 2012 - constitutional tribunal admitted lawsuit filed by the cs re...
7 5 julio 2012 - constitutional tribunal admitted lawsuit filed by the cs re...
 
Moj falsifying documents
Moj falsifying documentsMoj falsifying documents
Moj falsifying documents
 

Similar to Judgment EAT judge peter clark

Judgment eat registrar ms donleavy
Judgment eat registrar ms donleavyJudgment eat registrar ms donleavy
Judgment eat registrar ms donleavyDouglas GARDINER
 
Bhardwaj v FDA
Bhardwaj v FDABhardwaj v FDA
Bhardwaj v FDAJoe Sykes
 
Godfrey Morgan v Cobalt
Godfrey Morgan v CobaltGodfrey Morgan v Cobalt
Godfrey Morgan v CobaltMurray Grant
 
Public matters newsletter July 2015
Public matters newsletter July 2015Public matters newsletter July 2015
Public matters newsletter July 2015Browne Jacobson LLP
 
Litigation in the UK
Litigation in the UKLitigation in the UK
Litigation in the UKHelen Tung
 
Ut13 eng 23 feb 2018 - r
Ut13 eng 23 feb 2018 - rUt13 eng 23 feb 2018 - r
Ut13 eng 23 feb 2018 - rJohn Smith
 
Bennett v LB Southwark (EAT)
Bennett v LB Southwark (EAT)Bennett v LB Southwark (EAT)
Bennett v LB Southwark (EAT)Joe Sykes
 
181100347 social-legislation-digested-cases
181100347 social-legislation-digested-cases181100347 social-legislation-digested-cases
181100347 social-legislation-digested-caseshomeworkping10
 
Disruptive Innovation & Anti-Lobbying action in the Irish Legal System!
Disruptive Innovation & Anti-Lobbying action in the Irish Legal System!Disruptive Innovation & Anti-Lobbying action in the Irish Legal System!
Disruptive Innovation & Anti-Lobbying action in the Irish Legal System!Arno Gaultier
 
POSITION OF LOCUS STANDI IN MALAYSIA AND UNITED KINGDOM
POSITION OF LOCUS STANDI IN MALAYSIA AND UNITED KINGDOMPOSITION OF LOCUS STANDI IN MALAYSIA AND UNITED KINGDOM
POSITION OF LOCUS STANDI IN MALAYSIA AND UNITED KINGDOMASMAH CHE WAN
 
equity assist diligent not the tardy
equity assist diligent not the tardyequity assist diligent not the tardy
equity assist diligent not the tardyIntan Muhammad
 
Kovacs v Queen Mary and Westfield College
Kovacs v Queen Mary and Westfield CollegeKovacs v Queen Mary and Westfield College
Kovacs v Queen Mary and Westfield CollegeJoe Sykes
 
Major project law604.
Major project   law604.Major project   law604.
Major project law604.Marts NaDj
 
Indirect Tax Update 41/2014
Indirect Tax Update 41/2014Indirect Tax Update 41/2014
Indirect Tax Update 41/2014Graham Brearley
 
Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...
 Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po... Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...
Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...Legal
 
La carta de new york to griesa
La carta de new york to griesaLa carta de new york to griesa
La carta de new york to griesaBarby Del Pópolo
 

Similar to Judgment EAT judge peter clark (20)

Judgment eat registrar ms donleavy
Judgment eat registrar ms donleavyJudgment eat registrar ms donleavy
Judgment eat registrar ms donleavy
 
Bhardwaj v FDA
Bhardwaj v FDABhardwaj v FDA
Bhardwaj v FDA
 
Godfrey Morgan v Cobalt
Godfrey Morgan v CobaltGodfrey Morgan v Cobalt
Godfrey Morgan v Cobalt
 
Case Transfer 4109312
Case Transfer 4109312Case Transfer 4109312
Case Transfer 4109312
 
Public Matters July 2016
Public Matters July 2016Public Matters July 2016
Public Matters July 2016
 
144151651 case2
144151651 case2144151651 case2
144151651 case2
 
Public matters newsletter July 2015
Public matters newsletter July 2015Public matters newsletter July 2015
Public matters newsletter July 2015
 
Litigation in the UK
Litigation in the UKLitigation in the UK
Litigation in the UK
 
Itu162014
Itu162014Itu162014
Itu162014
 
Ut13 eng 23 feb 2018 - r
Ut13 eng 23 feb 2018 - rUt13 eng 23 feb 2018 - r
Ut13 eng 23 feb 2018 - r
 
Bennett v LB Southwark (EAT)
Bennett v LB Southwark (EAT)Bennett v LB Southwark (EAT)
Bennett v LB Southwark (EAT)
 
181100347 social-legislation-digested-cases
181100347 social-legislation-digested-cases181100347 social-legislation-digested-cases
181100347 social-legislation-digested-cases
 
Disruptive Innovation & Anti-Lobbying action in the Irish Legal System!
Disruptive Innovation & Anti-Lobbying action in the Irish Legal System!Disruptive Innovation & Anti-Lobbying action in the Irish Legal System!
Disruptive Innovation & Anti-Lobbying action in the Irish Legal System!
 
POSITION OF LOCUS STANDI IN MALAYSIA AND UNITED KINGDOM
POSITION OF LOCUS STANDI IN MALAYSIA AND UNITED KINGDOMPOSITION OF LOCUS STANDI IN MALAYSIA AND UNITED KINGDOM
POSITION OF LOCUS STANDI IN MALAYSIA AND UNITED KINGDOM
 
equity assist diligent not the tardy
equity assist diligent not the tardyequity assist diligent not the tardy
equity assist diligent not the tardy
 
Kovacs v Queen Mary and Westfield College
Kovacs v Queen Mary and Westfield CollegeKovacs v Queen Mary and Westfield College
Kovacs v Queen Mary and Westfield College
 
Major project law604.
Major project   law604.Major project   law604.
Major project law604.
 
Indirect Tax Update 41/2014
Indirect Tax Update 41/2014Indirect Tax Update 41/2014
Indirect Tax Update 41/2014
 
Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...
 Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po... Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...
Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...
 
La carta de new york to griesa
La carta de new york to griesaLa carta de new york to griesa
La carta de new york to griesa
 

More from Douglas GARDINER (20)

Sir robert francis qc
Sir robert francis qcSir robert francis qc
Sir robert francis qc
 
Letter from president
Letter from presidentLetter from president
Letter from president
 
REJ Parkin
REJ ParkinREJ Parkin
REJ Parkin
 
Judicial ombudsman
Judicial ombudsmanJudicial ombudsman
Judicial ombudsman
 
Judgment Judge Hand QC
Judgment Judge Hand QCJudgment Judge Hand QC
Judgment Judge Hand QC
 
Judgment
JudgmentJudgment
Judgment
 
The Bangalore principles of Judicial Conduct
The Bangalore principles of Judicial ConductThe Bangalore principles of Judicial Conduct
The Bangalore principles of Judicial Conduct
 
Judgment Judge Hand in chambers
Judgment Judge Hand in chambersJudgment Judge Hand in chambers
Judgment Judge Hand in chambers
 
Case management order
Case management orderCase management order
Case management order
 
Judgment case a51 yj932
Judgment case a51 yj932Judgment case a51 yj932
Judgment case a51 yj932
 
JCIO Reply
JCIO ReplyJCIO Reply
JCIO Reply
 
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreedJudicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
 
Judicial complaint dismissal
Judicial complaint dismissalJudicial complaint dismissal
Judicial complaint dismissal
 
20039 2014 part 2-signed
20039 2014   part 2-signed20039 2014   part 2-signed
20039 2014 part 2-signed
 
20039 2014 part 1
20039 2014 part 120039 2014 part 1
20039 2014 part 1
 
Beyond belief
Beyond beliefBeyond belief
Beyond belief
 
Annex 1
Annex 1Annex 1
Annex 1
 
Serial litigant
Serial litigantSerial litigant
Serial litigant
 
Case A51YJ932 n181 direction questionaire
Case A51YJ932   n181 direction questionaireCase A51YJ932   n181 direction questionaire
Case A51YJ932 n181 direction questionaire
 
Cru1
Cru1Cru1
Cru1
 

Recently uploaded

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881mayurchatre90
 
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labourTHE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labourBhavikaGholap1
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxRRR Chambers
 
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdfRelationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdfKelechi48
 
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...James Watkins, III JD CFP®
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteDeepikaK245113
 
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction FailsCAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction FailsAurora Consulting
 
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书SS A
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULEsreeramsaipranitha
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm2020000445musaib
 
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxPowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxca2or2tx
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxRRR Chambers
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubham Wadhonkar
 
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxHuman Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxfilippoluciani9
 
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptxINVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptxnyabatejosphat1
 
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdfSUSHMITAPOTHAL
 
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptxTransferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx2020000445musaib
 
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxKEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxRRR Chambers
 
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书E LSS
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
 
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labourTHE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx   labour
THE FACTORIES ACT,1948 (2).pptx labour
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
 
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdfRelationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
 
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
 
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction FailsCAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
CAFC Chronicles: Costly Tales of Claim Construction Fails
 
Rohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
Rohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No AdvanceRohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
Rohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
 
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
 
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxPowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
 
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptxMOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
MOCK GENERAL MEETINGS (SS-2)- PPT- Part 2.pptx
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptxHuman Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
Human Rights_FilippoLuciani diritti umani.pptx
 
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptxINVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
 
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
 
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptxTransferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
 
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptxKEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
KEY NOTE- IBC(INSOLVENCY & BANKRUPTCY CODE) DESIGN- PPT.pptx
 
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
 

Judgment EAT judge peter clark

  • 1. EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Second Floor, Fleetbank House 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX Telephone : 020 7273 1061 Facsimile : 020 7273 1045 www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/courts-and-tribunals/tribunals/employment-appeals/ Our Reference: UKEATPA/0386/13/LA Mr Douglas Iain Gardiner 5 Weavern Court Chippenham Wilts SN14 0LU E-mail & Post 06 June 2013 Dear Sir Mr D I Gardiner v EXSTO UK Ltd I am writing with reference to your Notice of Appeal in the above case from the Decision of an Employment Tribunal sitting at Bristol and promulgated on 21 January 2013. Under Section 21 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, this Appeal Tribunal only has jurisdiction to hear appeals from Employment Tribunal Decisions on questions of law, i.e. where it is argued that the Tribunal made some mistake in its interpretation or application of the law in reaching its decision. This means that it is not the function of this Appeal Tribunal to re-hear the facts of a case or to review an Employment Tribunal’s decision on those facts. The appeal has been referred to His Honour Judge Peter Clark in accordance with Rule 3(7) of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993 (as amended) and in his opinion your Notice of Appeal discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing the appeal. He states: It is a cardinal rule of law that claims between the same parties, once finally determined, cannot be relitigated. The principle of finality of litigation applies. The present claims are based on the Appellant’s employment with the Respondent which ended with his resignation effective on 28 May 2011. He then brought various claims in the Bristol ET which were dismissed by an ET chaired by Employment Judge Owen in September 2011. Now he wishes to revive those claims in these proceedings, adding further claims which could and should have been raised in the original proceedings. That is not permissible. Employment Judge Harper was right to strike them out. For the above reasons the learned Judge considers that this Appeal has no reasonable prospect of success and that, in accordance with Rule 3(7), no further action will be taken on it.
  • 2. EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Second Floor, Fleetbank House 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX Telephone : 020 7273 1061 Facsimile : 020 7273 1045 www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/courts-and-tribunals/tribunals/employment-appeals/ Your attention is drawn to Rules 3(8) and 3(10) of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules. A copy of Rule 3 is enclosed with this letter. Yours faithfully Ms J Johnson Deputy Registrar CC: Peninsula Business Services Ltd for the Respondent (Ref: Mr Neil Clowrey) Bristol Employment Tribunal (ref: 1401745/12,1401756/12 & 1401811/12)