Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- Overhead Crane Manual by scojetinc 1629 views
- Gantry crane design calculations by ytcrane 4763 views
- Overhead Cranes by Crane engineerin... by Crane Engineering... 3228 views
- Overhead Crane by Jared Hiett 14768 views
- Lecture 6 s.s.iii Design of Steel S... by Ursachi Răzvan 2272 views
- short Report by shivam singh chandel 752 views

2,193 views

1,772 views

1,772 views

Published on

steel crane

No Downloads

Total views

2,193

On SlideShare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

16

Shares

0

Downloads

123

Comments

0

Likes

2

No embeds

No notes for slide

- 1. 2011-2012 Crane Runway Girder Dr. Ibrahim Fahdah Damascus University https://sites.google.com/site/ifahdah/home/lectures
- 2. 2011-2012
- 3. 2011-2012 Components of Crane system
- 4. 2011-2012 The Crane Runway Girder and the Structure Issue1: Vertical Load Transformation The support method of the crane runway girder depends on the magnitude of the reactions being transmitted. Some typical arrangements ranging from the lightest to the heaviest are shown
- 5. 2011-2012 The Crane Runway Girder and the Structure Issue2: Free Rotation at the Supports Free rotation at the supports of crane runway girders is important in order to prevent bending and torsional moments in the columns.
- 6. 2011-2012 The Crane Runway Girder and the Structure Issue3: Transverse Load Transformation Figure (b) illustrates the reversible strain to which the girder web is subjected - an action leading to the result shown in Figure (c) Dangerous details for lateral forces
- 7. 2011-2012 The Crane Runway Girder and the Structure Issue3 could easily be prevented by simply connecting the top flange directly to the column, as shown. The top flange acts as a horizontal beam delivering its reaction to the column.
- 8. 2011-2012 Typical Section of Crane Girders
- 9. 2011-2012 Rail Fastenings
- 10. 2011-2012 Design Procedure (BS5950 Code)
- 11. 2011-2012 Classification of Cranes
- 12. 2011-2012 Step1: Calculate the maximum vertical Loads • The weight of the trolley (carriage) + Lifted Load (Rh) • The weight of the crane bridge (Rs) • The self weight of the crane girder & Rails (Rg) Note: The load to the crane girder will be maximum when trolley wheels are closest to the girder.
- 13. 2011-2012 Step1: Calculate the maximum vertical Loads (cont.) For Warehouse or workshop F=1.3 => the load combinations below Conservatively we can simplify the calculation , a factor of 1.3 can be applied simultaneously to both the lifted load and to the self-weight of the crane.
- 14. 2011-2012 Step1: Calculate the maximum vertical Loads (cont.) So the maximum unfactored static point load per wheel, assuming there are two wheels on each side, is: Rw=1.3*0.5*(Rs/2+Rh*(Lc-ah)/Lc)
- 15. 2011-2012 Step2: Calculate the Horizontal Loads Plan View
- 16. 2011-2012 Step2: Calculate the Horizontal Loads • Inertia forces produced by the motion drives or brakes. Referred to as the surge load. (clause 3.1.5.1 of BS 2573-1:1983[4]). • Skew loads due to travelling referred to as the crabbing force. (clause 3.1.5.2, BS 2573: Part 1:1983 [4])
- 17. 2011-2012 Step2: Calculate the Horizontal Loads • Transverse Surge load is taken as 10% of the combined weight of the crab and the lifted load. • Longitudinal Surge load of 5% of the static vertical reactions. (i.e. from the weight of the crab, crane bridge and lifted load). • Crabbing forces are obtained from clause 4.11.2 (BS 5950-1:2000). If the crane is class Q1 or Q2, then the crabbing forces would not need to be considered. Note : Horizontal loads need not to be combined together.
- 18. 2011-2012 Step3: Load Combinations Wv FR Wh1 Rail Wheel Wh2 Load combination according to BS 5950-1:2000 (Table 2) are: • LC1 =1.4 DL + 1.6 Wv • LC2 =1.4 DL + 1.6 (Wh1 or Wh2 or FR) • LC3 =1.4 DL + 1.4 Wv + 1.4 (Wh1 or Wh2 or FR)
- 19. 2011-2012 Step4: Design Checks 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Major axis bending Lateral-torsional buckling Horizontal moment capacity Consider combined vertical and horizontal moments Web shear at supports Local compression under wheels Web bearing and buckling under the wheel Deflection
- 20. 2011-2012 Major Axis Bending For plastic section: Note : Sx is for the whole section BS 5950-1-2000 4.2.5 Check limit to avoid irreversible deformation under serviceability loads. BS 5950-1-2000 4.2.5.1 Note: for section classification of compound I- or H-sections, see BS 5950-1-2000 : 3.5.3 & Table 11. Note: Moment capacity should be reduced in case of high shear according to BS 5950-1-2000 : 4.2.5.3
- 21. 2011-2012 Lateral-Torsional Buckling • Check gantry girder as an unrestrained member for vertical loads. • Due to interaction between crane wheels and crane rails, crane loads need not be treated as destabilizing, assuming that the rails are not mounted on resilient pads. • No account should be taken of the effect of moment gradient i.e. mLT (lateral-torsional buckling factor) should be taken as 1.0. BS 5950-2000 4.11.3 BS 5950-2000 4.11.3 BS 5950-2000 4.3.6.3 ,4.3.6.2, and 4.3.6.4 Pb is the bending strength and is dependent on the design strength py and the equivalent slenderness λLT. BS 5950-2000 4.3.6.7(a) For compound section (Rolled section + plate ), use I and H with unequal flanges to calculate λLT.
- 22. 2011-2012 Horizontal Moment Capacity Horizontal loads are assumed to be carried by the top flange plate only. Moment capacity of the top flange plate, Mc,plate is equal to the lesser of 1.2py Zplate and py*Splate. BS 5950-1-2000 4.2.5
- 23. 2011-2012 Consider Combined Vertical and Horizontal Moments 1-Section Capacity: BS 5950-1-2000 4.8.3.2 2-Buckling Capacity: “simplified method” BS 5950-1-2000 4.8.3.3.1 For simplicity take maximum M x and M y (rather than coexistent M x and M y) and assume that the minor axis loads are carried by the plate only. M LT is the maximum major axis moment in the segment. Note : mx, my factors can be taken as 1.0 for simplicity.
- 24. 2011-2012 Web Shear at Supports BS 5950-1-2000 4.8.3 Note: It is ok to assume that the sear is resisted by the UB section => Av = tD (for rolled I-sections, load parallel to web) BS 5950-1-2000 4.8.3 (a)
- 25. 2011-2012 Local Compression under Wheels The local compressive stress in the web due to a crane wheel load may be obtained by distributing it over a length xR given by: 45 HR Tplate Tflange 2(HR+T) The stress (fw) obtained by dispersing the wheel load over the length xR should not be greater than py for the web. BS 5950-1-2000 4.11.1
- 26. 2011-2012 Web bearing and buckling under the wheel/supports Bearing capacity of web for unstiffened web BS 5950-1-2000 4.5.2.1 Buckling resistance of the unstiffened web BS 5950-1-2000 4.5.31.
- 27. 2011-2012 Deflections Vertical deflection due to static vertical wheel loads from overhead travelling cranes Horizontal deflection (calculated on the top flange properties alone) due to horizontal crane loads Note : The deflection of crane beams can be important and the exact calculations can be complex with a system of rolling loads. However, For two equal loads, a useful assumption is that the maximum deflection occurs at the centre of the span when the loads are positioned equidistant about the centre. BS 5950-1-2000 2.5.2 Table 8(c)

No public clipboards found for this slide

×
### Save the most important slides with Clipping

Clipping is a handy way to collect and organize the most important slides from a presentation. You can keep your great finds in clipboards organized around topics.

Be the first to comment