ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED SLEEPERS

4,478 views

Published on

@ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, SHARDA UNIVERSITY, GREATER NOIDA, UP- DELHI

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
12 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
4,478
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
10
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
348
Comments
0
Likes
12
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED SLEEPERS

  1. 1. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE SLEEPERS BY YUSUF M. HASHIM, HASSANABBAMUSA M.TECH. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, SHARDA UNIVERSITY AT
  2. 2. the ballast and the subgrade. Prestressed concrete sleepers are supplied ready for laying straight from the factory, meaning that all the reinforcing has been built into the sleeper and prestressed in accordance with the standards. They were first of all used in France round about in 1914 but are common since 1950 and later developed and used by the British and German federal railways after the Second World War.
  3. 3. GENERAL FUNCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF SLEEPERS • To provide support and fixing possibilities for the rail foot and fastenings. • To sustain rail forces and transfer them as uniformly as possible to the ballast bed. • To preserve track gauge and rail inclination. • To provide adequate electrical insulation between both rails. • To be resistant to mechanical influences and weathering over a long time period.
  4. 4. TYPES OF PRESTRESSED SLEEPERS The most commonly used Pre-stressed sleepers which have been adopted by the railways of various countries are: 1. Twin-block sleepers: These are connected by a coupling rod or pipe filled with concrete and containing high-tensile bars for compressing the concrete in the blocks as illustrated in fig. 1 2. Longitudinal sleepers located continuously under the rails and connected by flexible tie bars for gauge retention as illustrated in fig 2
  5. 5. 3. Mono-block sleepers: These are Beam-type single-piece prestressed concrete sleepers, and have roughly the same dimensions as timber sleepers. The advantages of the twin-block sleeper over the mono-block sleeper are: well-defined bearing surfaces and also high lateral resistance in the ballast bed. The advantages of beam-type sleepers are their lower cost and high flexural stiffness. They also provide greater measure of rigidity to the track if the rails are tightly fastened to the sleepers, preventing rotations at the seating and buckling of the rails.
  6. 6. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF SLEEPERS The principal function of rail road tie is to distribute the wheel loads carried by the rails to the ballast. Although the sleeper is a simple determinate structural element, it is not possible to precisely evaluate the loads to which a concrete sleeper is subjected to during its service life, due to the various uncertainties and complexities inherent in the variables involved, together with the inadequate knowledge of the dynamics of the track structure.
  7. 7. The various factors influencing the design of sleepers are; 1. The static and dynamic loads imposed on rail seats which depend upon; • The type of track (straight or curved) • It’s construction and standard of maintenance • The axle load and their spacing • The running characteristics, speed and standard of maintenance of vehicles.
  8. 8. 2. The ballast reaction on the sleeper, which is influenced by; • The shape of the sleeper. • It’s flexibility and spacing. • The unit weight of the rail. • The standard on maintenance of the track. • The characteristics of the ballast. END OF FIRST PRESENTER
  9. 9. The “permissible stress” method is currently most commonly used to design sleepers. However, the permissible stress principle does not consider the ultimate strength of materials, probabilities of actual loads, and the risks associated with failure, all of which could lead to the conclusion of cost-ineffectiveness and over design of current pre-stressed concrete sleepers. Recently, the limit states design method, which appeared in the last century and has been already proposed as a better method for the design of pre-stressed concrete sleepers. The limit states design has significant advantages compared to the permissible stress design, such as the utilisation of the full strength of the member, and a rational analysis of the probabilities related to sleeper strength and applied loads. First Concept DESIGN OF PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE SLEEPERS  introduction
  10. 10.  Codes of practice for design of pc sleepers  Indian standard (IS: 12269 – 1987) with amendment No.6 of June 2000, Specification for 53-S grade cement for manufacture of concrete sleepers.  Indian Railway Standard Specification for Pre-tensioned Pre-stressed Concrete Sleepers, For Broad Gauge And Metre Gauge , Serial No. T-39- 85 (Fourth Revision – Aug’ 2011).  Australian Standard (AS 1085.14-2003), Railway track material Pre- stressed concrete sleepers  design of pc sleepers (A) - GENERAL CONDITION 1. TYPE AND SPACING The sleepers shall be pre-stressed concrete sleepers intended for track designs using centre-to-centre spacings of sleepers of 500 mm to 750 mm. The sleepers are designed as fully prestressed sections where the limiting stresses are based on the fatigue resistance of the concrete.
  11. 11. 2. SHAPE AND DIMENSIONS The depth and width of the sleeper may vary throughout its length. The minimum length of the sleeper shall be determined by the bond development requirements of the pre-stressing tendons, and the base width shall then be determined by the allowable bearing pressure. 3. CLEAR TENDON COVER Minimum clear concrete cover to tendons at the soffit of the sleeper shall be 35 mm. Elsewhere, the minimum clear concrete cover to tendons generally shall be 25 mm with the exception that the tendon may be exposed at the end faces. (B) - DESIGN FORCES 1. VERTICAL WHEEL LOAD The design static wheel load shall be specified by the purchaser. NOTE: For information about dynamic effects on wheel loads and sleepers, See Appendix 2. QUASISTATIC LOAD The Quasistatic load is the sum of the static load and the effect of the static load at speed. It includes the effects of the geometrical roughness of the track on vehicle response and the effect of unbalanced superelevation.
  12. 12. The dynamic load is the load due to high frequency effects of the wheel/rail load interaction and track component response. A minimum allowance of 150 percent of static wheel load shall be used. 3. DYNAMIC LOAD The combined quasistatic and dynamic design load is the sum of the static load, the allowance for the effects of the static load at speed and the allowance for dynamic effects and shall be not less than 2.5 times the static wheel load. Therefore, the combined quasistatic and dynamic design load factor (j) shall be not less than 2.5. 4. COMBINED VERTICAL DESIGN LOAD FACTOR (J) FIGURE 4.1 AXLE LOAD DISTRIBUTION FACTOR (DF)
  13. 13. The proportion of vertical load taken by a single sleeper resulting from a single wheel may be determined from the following equation provided the values used in the equation can be determined: where Qx = the load carried by any sleeper, per rail, in kilonewtons, for a single wheel at distance x x = distance from the sleeper to the wheel load, in metres zx = rail deflection at distance x from a point load s = sleeper spacing, in metres Q = static wheel load, in kilonewtons λ = (k/4EI)0.25 k = track modulus, in megapascals E = Young's modulus for the rail steel, in megapascals I = second moment of area for the rail section, in metres
  14. 14. RAIL SEAT LOAD The value of the rail seat load (R) shall be based on the impact and load distribution factors determined in accordance with Clauses 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 and shall be calculated as follows: R = jQ DF/100 . BALLAST AND BALLAST PRESSURE The maximum ballast pressure shall be determined from loading conditions similar to those for the maximum positive bending moment at the rail seat (see Clause 4.3.2.1 and Table 4.1). This maximum ballast pressure )( ab p is based on a uniform pressure distribution beneath each rail seat and is calculated using the appropriate equation from Table 4.1. Table 4.1 maximum ballast pressure
  15. 15. LATERAL LOADS In order to prevent gauge-widening under traffic, fastenings shall restrain the rail from lateral movement when a lateral load is applied at the rail head in addition to vertical wheel load as specified in Clause 4.2.1.1. AS 1085.19 provides requirements for resilient fastenings (see Section 5). LONGITUDINAL LOADS The rail shall be restrained to avoid excessive longitudinal movement. A minimum longitudinal restraint force of 10 kN per rail seat shall be allowed. Maximum movement of the rail relative to the rail seat under such a load shall not exceed the values given in AS 1085.19 (see Section 5).
  16. 16. RAIL SEAT NEGATIVE DESIGN BENDING MOMENT The rail seat negative design bending moment (MR−) shall be not less than 67 percent of the rail seat positive design bending moment or 14 kNm, whichever is greater.
  17. 17. MOMENTS AT CENTRE CENTRE POSITIVE DESIGN BENDING MOMENT The maximum positive bending moment of the sleeper shall be based on a pressure distribution beneath each rail seat, similar to that shown in Figure 4.2(a). The length of the ballast pressure distribution beneath each rail seat and the centre positive design bending moment (MC+) shall be calculated from the appropriate equation given in Table 4.3.
  18. 18. CENTRE NEGATIVE DESIGN BENDING MOMENT The maximum negative bending moment shall be taken to occur at the centre of the sleeper, under partially or totally centrebound conditions producing tensile stress at the top and compressive stress at the underside of the sleeper. The value of the centre negative design bending moment (MC−) for track gauge of 1600 mm and greater is based on a ballast pressure distribution as shown in Figure 4.2(b) and is calculated as follows: The value of the maximum centre negative bending moment (MC−) for track gauge of 1435 mm is based on a uniform distribution of ballast pressure on the sleeper soffit and is calculated as follows:
  19. 19. LOSS OF PRESTRESS The loss of pre-stress shall be determined by the methods specified in AS 3600. For preliminary design, a value of 25 percent may be assumed. NOTE: A lower value of total loss may be considered if it can be proven by testing (see Paragraph E7, Appendix E). DEVELOPMENT LENGTH AND END ZONE The development lengths of tendons shall comply with AS 3600. Bursting and spalling forces shall be assessed and reinforcement provided if needed.
  20. 20. Thank you ! ANY QUESTIONS TO BE CLARIFIED ?

×