Download as PDF, PPTX
![• Adams J, Loach T. (2015). Altmetric mentions and the communication
of medical research.
• Maggio LA, Leroux T, Meyer HS, Artino AR. (2018). Exploring the
relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of
dissemination in health professions education.
• Wooldridge J, King MB. (2018). Altmetric scores: An early indicator of
research impact.
• Lemke S., Peters I., Mazarakis A. (2019, March 20). “If you use social
media then you are not working” – How do social scientists perceive
altmetrics and online forms of scholarly communication? [Blog post].
https://www.flickr.com/photos/interactive-content/29441904066/
References](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciomtm2019-190529084052/75/Science-dissemination-2-0-Social-media-for-researchers-MTM-MSc-2019-26-2048.jpg)
![• LSE Impact Blog. (2012, February 24). Five minutes with Patrick Dunleavy
and Chris Gilson: “Blogging is quite simply, one of the most important
things that an academic should be doing right now”. [Blog post].
• Dunleavy, P. (2014, December 28). Shorter, better, faster, free: Blogging
changes the nature of academic research, not just how it is
communicated [Blog post].
• Dunleavy, P. (2016, January 25). How to write a blogpost from your
journal article in eleven easy steps. [Blog post].
• Carrigan, M. (2016, April 26) 40 reasons why you should blog about your
research [Blog post].
• Mollett A., Brumley C., Gilson C., Williams S. (2017, May 25). So you’ve
decided to blog? These are the things you should write about. [Blog
post].
http://maxpixel.freegreatpicture.com/Internet-Report-Information-Blogging-Blogger-Blog-970722
References](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciomtm2019-190529084052/75/Science-dissemination-2-0-Social-media-for-researchers-MTM-MSc-2019-60-2048.jpg)
![• Wheeler, T. (2015, August 21). Permission to tweet? The
underlying principles of good science communication are
all about sharing. [Blog post].
• Haustein, S. & Costas, R. (2015). Identifying Twitter
audiences: who is tweeting about scientific papers?
• Ortega, JL. (2017, December 4). Academic journals with a
presence on Twitter are more widely disseminated and
receive a higher number of citations. [Blog post].
References (2)](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciomtm2019-190529084052/75/Science-dissemination-2-0-Social-media-for-researchers-MTM-MSc-2019-82-2048.jpg)
![• Gill, J. (2013, 2 January). Six ways to use Google + Hangouts for
academic productivity. [Blog post].
• Noruzi, A. (2017). YouTube in scientific research: A bibliometric analysis
• Diner E. (2019, 25 January). Should academics share their
presentations? [Blog post].
References](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciomtm2019-190529084052/75/Science-dissemination-2-0-Social-media-for-researchers-MTM-MSc-2019-98-2048.jpg)
![• Konkiel, S. (2016, July 8). A ‘quick and dirty’ guide to building your online
reputation. [Blog post]
• Innovations in Scholarly Communication. Universiteit Utrecht.
• Social media en investigación. Lydia Gil.
• Herman, E. and Nicholas, D. (2019). Scholarly reputation building in the
digital age: an activity-specific approach.
• Jordan, K. (2019). From Social Networks to Publishing Platforms: A Review
of the History and Scholarship of Academic Social Network Sites
https://www.flickr.com/photos/frosch50/21492514468](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/presentaciomtm2019-190529084052/75/Science-dissemination-2-0-Social-media-for-researchers-MTM-MSc-2019-123-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byXavier Lasauca i Cisa
Science dissemination 2.0: Social media for researchers (MTM-MSc 2019)
The document discusses the importance of social media for researchers, highlighting its role in enhancing visibility, networking, and information dissemination in the academic community. It emphasizes the benefits of open science and altmetrics, which provide real-time metrics on research impact. Additionally, it offers practical strategies for researchers to build their online presence and reputation through various digital platforms.
More Related Content
Similar to Science dissemination 2.0: Social media for researchers (MTM-MSc 2019)
Science dissemination 2.0: Social media for researchers (MTM-MSc 2019)
- 1. Master in TranslationalMedicine-MSc University of Barcelona, 28 May 2019 Science dissemination 2.0 Social media for researchers Xavier Lasauca i Cisa @xavierlasauca https://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8476983849/in/album-72157632752675173
- 3.
- 4. • To getnew information • To increase the impact and visibility of research papers • To engage with fellow researchers and meet new collaborators • To improve a researcher's public profile, build your on line reputation and thus competitiveness • As part of the research process Using social media can be really beneficial: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mkhmarketing/8540717756
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 14.
- 19.
- 20.
- 24. Track thedissemination of research beyond academia Show the attention, reception, and response to a published work prior to it being cited Can be applied to non-traditional research outputs like data-sets and blog posts Show research impact in real-time — scholars and journals don’t have to wait for their score to be released, like in the Journal Citation Reports Source: Enter Alternative Metrics: Indicators that capture the value of research and richness of scholarly discourse https://www.flickr.com/photos/nirak/512878595
- 26. • Adams J,Loach T. (2015). Altmetric mentions and the communication of medical research. • Maggio LA, Leroux T, Meyer HS, Artino AR. (2018). Exploring the relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of dissemination in health professions education. • Wooldridge J, King MB. (2018). Altmetric scores: An early indicator of research impact. • Lemke S., Peters I., Mazarakis A. (2019, March 20). “If you use social media then you are not working” – How do social scientists perceive altmetrics and online forms of scholarly communication? [Blog post]. https://www.flickr.com/photos/interactive-content/29441904066/ References
- 27.
- 28.
- 29. Publications + ResearchData Accessible Reproducibility Reuse of results Transparency Visibility Impact Scientific progress
- 30.
- 31.
- 33. “Science is movingtowards a greater openness, in terms of not just data but also publications, computer code and workflows. Yet researchers who are learning to navigate the open-science arena face a thicket of thorny issues. “ Nature 569, 445-447 (2019) doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01506-x
- 34. • Open science:Sharing is caring, but is privacy theft?, David Mehler and Kevin Weiner. PLOS Neuro Community blog. 2018. • Qué es la ciencia abierta?, Lluís Anglada and Ernest Abadal. Anuario ThinkEPI, vol. 12. 2018. • Open science is all very well but how do you make it FAIR in practice?, Rachel Bruce and Bas Cordewener. JISC blog. 2018. • Mapping Open Science Tools, Lettie Y. Conrad. The Scholarly Kitchen blog. 2018. • Monográfico InfoDoc sobre Ciencia Abierta. Universidad de Salamanca. 2018. • Open Science: Sharing Your Research with the World: MOOC of the University of Delft. 2018. • Open Science MOOC: MOOC of the University of Leiden. 2018. • The Open Science Training Handbook. 2018. • Una aproximació al concepte de ciència oberta (i 25 recursos per aprofundir-hi), Xavier Lasauca i Cisa. L’ase quàntic blog. References
- 35. “This is meand my digital circumstance” Miquel Duran
- 38.
- 39.
- 40.
- 41.
- 42. “Let the contents cometo me.“ https://pixabay.com/photos/fishing-net-background-fishing-net-3433340/
- 45.
- 46.
- 47.
- 50.
- 51. Motive A: VisibilityMotive B: Networking Motive C: Information increase own impact connect with peers be up to date be found by peers and other stakeholders stay in touch with colleagues be part of a conversation present self/own work be(come) part of a community anticipate trends Source: (Micro)blogging Science? Notes on Potentials and Constraints of New Forms of Scholarly Communication, by Cornelius Puschmann
- 52.
- 58.
- 60. • LSE ImpactBlog. (2012, February 24). Five minutes with Patrick Dunleavy and Chris Gilson: “Blogging is quite simply, one of the most important things that an academic should be doing right now”. [Blog post]. • Dunleavy, P. (2014, December 28). Shorter, better, faster, free: Blogging changes the nature of academic research, not just how it is communicated [Blog post]. • Dunleavy, P. (2016, January 25). How to write a blogpost from your journal article in eleven easy steps. [Blog post]. • Carrigan, M. (2016, April 26) 40 reasons why you should blog about your research [Blog post]. • Mollett A., Brumley C., Gilson C., Williams S. (2017, May 25). So you’ve decided to blog? These are the things you should write about. [Blog post]. http://maxpixel.freegreatpicture.com/Internet-Report-Information-Blogging-Blogger-Blog-970722 References
- 61.
- 62. “Lo bueno, si breve,dos veces bueno.“ Baltasar Gracián ‘If the good is brief, then it is twice as good‘.
- 63.
- 66.
- 67.
- 69.
- 70. A player morewith pulmonary embolism? Teletovic, Varejão, Mickel... Tall players, lot of flights... Are they a risk group? #basketball #pulmonary
- 72. Is there anythingas rewarding for a researcher as responding to a hypothesis in a short time?
- 74. Twitter has very direct,and very relevant implications for those in Public Health
- 75. It’s a greatway to get information you otherwise wouldn’t At conferences, Twitter is invaluable for stimulating discussion and finding out what is happening in other sessions For lecturers, Twitter can contribute to discussions and deepen understanding The way we translate information is changing https://www.flickr.com/photos/47400163@N05/7846842772
- 76.
- 79. http://www.flickr.com/photos/72211347@N00/327122302# I am aresearcher and I am on Twitter… Now what?
- 80.
- 81. • Emily S.Darling et al (2013). The role of twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. • Qing Ke , Yong-Yeol Ahn and Cassidy R. Sugimoto (2017). A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter. • Monya Baker (2015). Social media: A network boost. References (1)
- 82. • Wheeler, T.(2015, August 21). Permission to tweet? The underlying principles of good science communication are all about sharing. [Blog post]. • Haustein, S. & Costas, R. (2015). Identifying Twitter audiences: who is tweeting about scientific papers? • Ortega, JL. (2017, December 4). Academic journals with a presence on Twitter are more widely disseminated and receive a higher number of citations. [Blog post]. References (2)
- 83.
- 84.
- 85. General networks Specificnetworks
- 91.
- 92. “Each of usfinds his unique vehicle for sharing with others his bit of wisdom.” Ram Dass https://www.flickr.com/photos/wefi_official/26959617928
- 93. Articles and presentations (Slideshare,issuu) Social bookmarking (Diigo) Images (flickr, Instagram) and videos (YouTube) Bibliographic data management (Zotero, Mendeley) Video chats (Skype, Google hangouts)
- 94.
- 95.
- 96.
- 98. • Gill, J.(2013, 2 January). Six ways to use Google + Hangouts for academic productivity. [Blog post]. • Noruzi, A. (2017). YouTube in scientific research: A bibliometric analysis • Diner E. (2019, 25 January). Should academics share their presentations? [Blog post]. References
- 99.
- 100. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0900702 Ultimately, the Internet providesa powerful communications channel, but it is health care professionals and the public who will best determine how to use this channel for surveillance, prevention, and control of emerging diseases.
- 101.
- 102.
- 103. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=25124281 Based on observations inthis study and the increased usage of social media, we posit that online illness reports could complement traditional surveillance systems by providing near real-time information on foodborne illnesses, implicated foods and locations.
- 104.
- 105.
- 107. 4 rules ofinfographics design by @ pere_rovira 1. - is + 2. Amount - quality - context 3. Be careful about lying and 4. statistics.
- 112.
- 113. Strategy • Define objectivesabout online presence (as individual researcher or research group) • Explore the tools and choose the most appropriate • Develop your network • Encourage feedback and discussion http://www.flickr.com/photos/ybot84/7850997682/
- 114.
- 115. 10 Simple Stepsto Building a Reputation as a Researcher, in Your Early Career 1. Register for an ORCID identifier 2. Register for information hubs: LinkedIN, Slideshare, and a domain name of your own 3. Register for Twitter 4. Write and share a 1-paragraph bio 5. Describe your research program in 2 paragraph 6. Create a CV and share it 7. Share (on Twitter & LinkedIN) news about something you did or published; an upcoming event in which you will participate; interesting news and publications in your field 8. Make writing; data; publication; software available as Open Access 9. Set up tracking of your citations, mentions, and topics you are interested in using Google scholar and Google alert, 10. Find your Klout score, H-index. Source:MicahAltman,sBlog http://nepalireporter.com/21956/paul-van-dyk-returns-uae/
- 116. Top 10 tipsto get started 1. Explore online guides (start with this). 2. Do some “lurking” (look at examples of good practice). 3. Locate pertinent and relevant online sources (e.g. who to follow on Twitter, interesting bloggers). 4. Start using content aggregation and curation tools (e.g. RSS, Diigo). 5. Identify a few key tools and start with those – know your limits! 6. Develop your network (e.g. LinkedIn, Twitter). 7. Join academic social network sites (e.g. ResearchGate, Mendeley). 8. Create your own website 9. Start blogging and twittering about your research (or whatever else takes your fancy!). 10. Keep your purpose and audience in mind. Source:IntroductiontoSocialMediaforresearchers,byGillesCouzin http://www.forbes.com/pictures/eeel45jfeg/1-tiesto-22-million/
- 117.
- 118. “I'm trying tofree your mind, Neo. But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it”
- 119.
- 120.
- 121.
- 123. • Konkiel, S.(2016, July 8). A ‘quick and dirty’ guide to building your online reputation. [Blog post] • Innovations in Scholarly Communication. Universiteit Utrecht. • Social media en investigación. Lydia Gil. • Herman, E. and Nicholas, D. (2019). Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. • Jordan, K. (2019). From Social Networks to Publishing Platforms: A Review of the History and Scholarship of Academic Social Network Sites https://www.flickr.com/photos/frosch50/21492514468
- 124. Public Consultation:‘Science 2.0’: Science in Transition European Commission. 2014 Emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars European Commission. 2015 Making Open Science a Reality. OECD. 2015 Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World: a vision for Europe. European Commission. 2016 Next generation metrics European Commission. 2017 Providing researchers with the skills and competencies they need to practice Open Science. European Commission. 2017 H2020 Programme. Guidance. Social media guide for EU funded R&I projects European Commission. 2018 https://www.flickr.com/photos/european_parliament/10943216394
- 126.
- 127. “Be open, myfriend.” “Let the contents come to me.“ “Spread the word.“ “Lo bueno, si breve, dos veces bueno.“ “Connect one another.” “Each of us finds his unique vehicle for sharing with others his bit of wisdom.”
- 128.
- 129. “Because sharing isn’t just nice;it’s absolutely critical.” Terry Wheeler xavierlasauca.cat https://www.flickr.com/photos/eightysixfilms/6176735010/