freight Final Review 5.13.pptx freight Final Review 5.13.pptx
Using and Creating Evidence.docx
1. Research: Using and Creating Evidence
Research: Using and Creating EvidenceResearch: Using and Creating EvidenceBegin
reviewing and replying to peer postings/responses. Participate in the discussion by asking a
question, providing a statement of clarification, providing viewpoints with a rationale,
challenging aspects of the discussion, or indicating relationships between two or more lines
of reasoning in the discussion.As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and
provide references for the citations in APA format. You may use thisAPA Citation Helperas a
convenient reference for properly citing resources.Ethics in HealthcareTaskTwo nurse
researchers are interested in studying whether a pain assessment tool for critical care
patients is valid and reliable when applied to a group of patients who cannot communicate
verbally due to mechanical ventilation. They design a validation study in which randomly
selected patients will be assessed using the tool after a painful procedure (tracheal
suctioning) and after a nonpainful procedure (oral care). If patient responses result in
higher scores after the painful procedure than after the nonpainful one, then the
researchers will conclude that the tool is effective for these patients in differentiating pain
responses from responses to nursing procedures in general.ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL,
PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERSUsing the definitions in the textbook:· Discuss and draw a
conclusion as to whether this study will likely be exempt, expedited, or full review.· Would
the study be considered ethical? Explain your rationale.Peer #1The patients who would be
used in this study are intubated which requires tracheal suctioning and oral care as part of
the daily care plan. Minimal risk is involved in this case considering the actions being
studied would be conducted regardless of the research study. That would lead us to lean
towards this study being expedited, but with the patients being mechanically ventilated
they cannot give consent to participate in the study. They now fall under the special
populations category as a person with a disability which would require a full board review.
We can ask the health care proxy or next of kin for consent, but I still believe that
considering the circumstances a full board review is needed to proceed to protect not only
the study participants, but also the persons conducting the study. I do believe that this study
would be ethical considering its topic of research is focused on pain responses to daily care
in mechanically ventilated patients, thus allowing us to better anticipate the needs of our
patients. Research: Using and Creating EvidenceHouser, J (2018).Nursing research; Reading,
using and creating evidence(4th edition). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.Peer
#2According to Houser, exempt review is defined as a “review of study proposals that pose
no risk to subjects; the full institutional review board is not required to participate”
2. (Houser, 2018, p. 481). Expedited review is defined as a “review of study proposals that
pose minimal risk to subjects; one or two institutional review board members participate”
(Houser, 2018, p. 481). Full review is defined as a “review of study proposals that pose
more than minimal risk to subjects, that do not qualify for exempt status, and in which the
full institutional review board committee participates” (Houser, 2018, p. 481). When
reviewing this proposed study, I would say that this would be an exempt review. I choose
exempt review because this study is using an assessment tool, which does not in itself posed
a risk to the patients’ safety. I do acknowledge that the premise of this tool being used is in
response after painful and nonpainful procedures occurring to the patient, however, these
procedures are not being enacted from the study itself and are procedures performed as
part of routine standard of care. I do not believe this study to be ethical. These patients are
unable to sign informed consent or are even aware the study is being performed. This
breaks the principles of bioethics on human subjects.Houser, J. (2018).Nursing Research:
Reading, Using and CreatingEvidence.[South University]. Retrieved
fromhttps://digitalbookshelf.southuniversity.edu/#books/97812841388871