SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 28
IN BRIEF
X In 2011, there were 5.1 million
drug-related emergency
department (ED) visits; about one
half (49 percent) were attributed
to drug misuse or abuse with
a nearly equal percentage (45
percent) attributed to adverse
drug reactions
X ED visits involving use of illicit
drugs were relatively stable from
2004 (991,640 visits) to 2009
(974,392 visits) but increased
from 2009 to 2011 (1,252,500
visits); between 2009 and 2011,
the rate of visits involving illicit
stimulants increased 68 percent,
and the rate of visits involving
marijuana rose 19 percent
X ED visits involving misuse or
abuse of pharmaceuticals
increased from 2004 (626,470
visits) through 2011 (1,428,145
visits); the most commonly
involved drugs were anti-anxiety
and insomnia medications
and narcotic pain relievers
(160.9 and 134.8 visits per
100,000 population, respectively)
X ED visits involving adverse
reactions to drugs increased
from 1,250,377 visits in 2005 to
2,287,271 visits in 2009; however,
no increase occurred between
2009 and 2011 (2,301,059 visits)
The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) provides nationally
representative patient demographic and visit-level information
on
emergency department (ED) visits resulting from substance
misuse
or abuse, adverse reactions to drugs taken as prescribed or
directed,
accidental ingestion of drugs, drug-related suicide attempts, and
ED
admissions for substance abuse treatment. The year 2011 marks
the
eighth year that the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services
Administration (SAMHSA) has collected data on drug-related
ED visits in the Nation using the new sampling and study design
introduced in 2004. This report highlights 2011 findings from
DAWN with comparisons to 2004 and 2009 for visits involving
illicit
drug use, misuse or abuse of pharmaceuticals, alcohol use,
adverse
reactions to drugs, and accidental ingestions. Multiyear data
collection
affords the opportunity to track the level of drug involvement in
medical emergencies in the Nation and alert the public health
community to changing patterns of drug use and misuse.
Analyses by
patient age and type of drug yield further insight into critical
age-
specific characteristics associated with drug use and misuse
behaviors.
Such information is critical to anticipating changes in drug use
behaviors and developing programmatic responses in a timely
fashion,
particularly for vulnerable populations such as adolescents and
young
adults. A more thorough analysis of 2011 and previous data will
be
available at the SAMHSA website
(http://www.samhsa.gov/data/),
including a comprehensive set of detailed tables that display
drug-
specific ED visit counts by various patient demographics and
visit
characteristics for the Nation and select metropolitan areas.
DAWN analyses and tables are used by the Federal, State, and
local
public health communities to guide the development of
substance
abuse intervention policy and evaluate programmatic efforts
targeted
at the prevention, intervention, and treatment of drug use and
abuse.
In addition, public health agencies such as the Centers for
Disease
Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration,
Highlights of the 2011 Drug
Abuse Warning Network (DAWN)
Findings on Drug-Related
Emergency Department Visits
DAWN_127
February 22, 2013
http://www.samhsa.gov/data/
February 22, 2013
THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse
Warning Network (DAWN)
Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits
2
Figure 1. Reasons for Drug-Related Emergency Department
(ED) Visits, by Year: 2004 to 2011
* The estimate for ED visits involving adverse reactions in 2004
was suppressed due to low statistical precision.
Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network
(DAWN).
pharmaceutical companies, and health researchers
track DAWN data to monitor life-threatening effects
of medications. Such information is used to inform
drug scheduling, drug labeling, and other public health
policy and program decision making.
For this report, all changes over time and between age
groups are measured by comparing the rate of ED visits
per 100,000 population, not point estimates. All reported
differences in rates are significant at the .05 level.
Overview
In 2011, there were 5.1 million drug-related ED visits
(Table 1).1 About one half (49 percent, or 2.5 million
visits) were attributed to drug misuse or abuse with
a nearly equal number (45 percent, or 2.3 million
visits) attributed to adverse drug reactions.2,3 Among
visits involving drug misuse or abuse, 1.4 million visits
involved pharmaceuticals, and 1.3 million involved illicit
drugs.4 Visits involving use of illicit drugs were relatively
stable from 2004 (991,640 visits) to 2009 (974,392
visits) but increased from 2009 to 2011 (1,252,500
visits) (Figure 1). The trend in visits involving misuse
or abuse of pharmaceuticals displayed a steady upward
climb from 2004 (626,470 visits) through 2011
(1,428,145 visits). Visits involving adverse reactions
to drugs increased from 1,250,377 visits in 2005 to
Table 1. Reasons for Drug-Related Emergency Department (ED)
Visits, by Patient Demographic and Visit
Characteristics: 2011
Reason for Visit
Number of
ED Visits
Percent of
ED Visits
Percent of ED Visits
Involving a Patient
Aged 21 or Older
Percent of ED
Visits Involving
a Male Patient
Percent of ED Visits
Resulting in Admission
to the Hospital
Percent of ED
Visits Involving
a Single Drug
Total ED Visits 5,067,374 100 81 48 24 66
Drug Misuse or Abuse* 2,462,948 49 82 56 25 51
Pharmaceuticals 1,428,145 28 87 50 27 41
Illicit Drugs 1,252,500 25 85 65 24 44
Adverse Reaction 2,301,059 45 82 39 21 82
Accidental Ingestion 113,624 2 26 50 10 86
* Because multiple drugs may be involved in each visit,
estimates of visits by drug may add to more than the total, and
percentages may add to more than 100 percent.
Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network
(DAWN).
Misuse or
Abuse of
Pharmaceuticals
Adverse
Reactions*
0
500,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
2,500,000
2006 2008 201120102004 2005 2007 2009
N
um
be
r
of
E
D
V
is
it
s
lllicit Drug Use
1,250,377
1,526,010
1,908,928
2,157,128
2,287,271 2,329,221 2,301,059
991,640 922,018 958,866 984,749
1,126,403
1,243,606
1,344,393
1,428,145
626,470
765,314
859,136
974,852 994,583 974,392
1,172,276
1,252,500
February 22, 2013
THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse
Warning Network (DAWN)
Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits
3
2,287,271 visits in 2009; however, no increases occurred
between 2009 and 2011 (2,301,059 visits).5
Patient Demographics and Visit Characteristics
Slightly more than 80 percent of drug-related ED visits
were made by adults aged 21 or older, 48 percent were
male, 24 percent resulted in the patient being admitted
to the hospital, and 66 percent involved a single drug
(Table 1). Among visits involving misuse or abuse of
drugs, 82 percent were made by adults aged 21 or older,
56 percent were made by males, 25 percent resulted
in the patient being admitted to the hospital, and
51 percent involved a single drug. Visits for adverse
reactions typically involved a single drug (82 percent),
and one fifth of patients were admitted to the hospital
(21 percent). Visits for accidental ingestions typically
involved patients aged 20 or younger, the majority
(86 percent) involved a single drug, and a small portion
(10 percent) were admitted to the hospital.
Visits Involving Illicit Drugs
In 2011, there were 402.0 ED visits per 100,000
population involving illicit drugs (Table 2). The
most commonly involved drug was cocaine, with
Table 2. Selected Substances Involved in Drug-Related
Emergency Department (ED) Visits for Misuse or Abuse of
Drugs: 2004, 2009, and 2011
Drug
Number of ED Visits
in 2011*
Rate of ED Visits per
100,000 Population
in 2011
Percent Change,
2004 to 2011**
Percent Change,
2009 to 2011**
Total ED Visits 2,462,948 790.4 52 19
Illicit Drugs 1,252,500 402.0 NC 27
Cocaine 505,224 162.1 NC NC
Marijuana 455,668 146.2 52 19
Heroin 258,482 83.0 NC NC
Illicit Stimulants 159,840 51.3 NC 68
Other Illicit Drugs 131,178 42.1 86 60
Pharmaceuticals 1,428,145 458.3 114 13
Anti-anxiety and Insomnia Medications 501,207 160.9 124 14
Alprazolam 154,016 49.4 155 NC
Clonazepam 76,557 24.6 122 NC
Lorazepam 50,399 16.2 127 NC
Zolpidem 37,225 11.9 152 NC
Narcotic Pain Relievers 420,040 134.8 153 NC
Oxycodone Products 175,229 56.2 220 NC
Hydrocodone Products 97,183 31.2 96 NC
Methadone 75,693 24.3 74 NC
Morphine Products 38,416 12.3 144 NC
Antidepressants 108,388 34.8 NC NC
Antipsychotics 76,197 24.5 71 NC
Cardiovascular Medications 55,543 17.8 63 NC
Anticonvulsants 53,142 17.1 51 NC
Muscle Relaxants 52,830 17.0 71 NC
Respiratory Medications 46,819 15.0 76 NC
Central Nervous System Stimulants 45,158 14.5 292 78
NC = no significant change.
* Because multiple drugs may be involved in each visit,
estimates of visits by drug may add to more than the total.
** Percent change is measured as the difference in the rates of
visits per 100,000 population between years. Reported changes
are significant at the .05 level.
Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network
(DAWN).
February 22, 2013
THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse
Warning Network (DAWN)
Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits
4
162.1 visits per 100,000 population. This was closely
followed by marijuana, which was involved in 146.2
visits per 100,000 population. Other drugs had lower
rates: heroin (83.0 visits per 100,000 population),
illicit stimulants (predominately amphetamines and
methamphetamine; 51.3 visits per 100,000 population),
and other illicit drugs (predominately PCP and various
hallucinogens; 42.1 visits per 100,000 population).
Trends
ED visits involving use of illicit drugs were relatively
stable from 2004 (991,640 visits) to 2009 (974,392
visits) but increased from 2009 to 2011 (1,252,500
visits). Between 2009 and 2011, the rate of visits
involving illicit stimulants increased 68 percent, the
rate of visits involving other illicit drugs (e.g., PCP,
hallucinogens) rose 60 percent, and the rate of visits
involving marijuana rose 19 percent (Table 2). Cocaine
and heroin involvement changed in neither the long
term from 2004 to 2011 nor the short term from 2009
to 2011.
Age
Figure 2 depicts the rates of ED visits per 100,000
population for the major illicit drug categories among
patients aged 12 to 17, aged 18 to 20, and aged 21
to 24. Rates of visits for heroin, cocaine, and illicit
stimulants rose for each successively older age group.
Visits involving marijuana were less common among
patients aged 12 to 17 (240.2 visits per 100,000
population) compared with the older age groups, but
there was no difference between those aged 18 to 20
(443.8 visits per 100,000 population) and those aged
21 to 24 (446.9 visits per 100,000 population).
Visits Involving Synthetic Cannabinoids
Synthetic cannabinoids first appeared in DAWN
records in 2009, but there were too few visits to be
reported. By 2010, ED visits involving synthetic
cannabinoids rose to a reportable level for the Nation
(3.7 visits per 100,000 population).6 By 2011, there
were 9.2 visits per 100,000 population involving
synthetic cannabinoids across all age groups—about
Figure 2. Rates of Emergency Department (ED) Visits Involving
Illicit Drugs among Patients Aged 12 to 24 per
100,000 Population, by Age Group: 2011
* The differences between those aged 12 to 17 and the two older
age groups were statistically significant at the .05 level.
**All differences between age groups were statistically
significant at the .05 level.
Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network
(DAWN).
0
100
200
400
300
500
Marijuana*
ED
V
is
it
s
pe
r
10
0,
00
0
Po
pu
la
ti
on
Heroin**
Persons Aged 12 to 17
Cocaine** Illicit Stimulants**
Illicit Drugs
Synthetic Cannabinoids**
Persons Aged 18 to 20
Persons Aged 21 to 24
240.2
443.8 446.9
8.5
134.6
266.1
23.5
112.5
214.4
23.5
89.8
141.5
30.2
60.8
16.3
February 22, 2013
THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse
Warning Network (DAWN)
Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits
5
a 150 percent increase (data not shown). The rate of
visits involving synthetic cannabinoids was highest
among patients aged 18 to 20 (60.8 visits per 100,000
population), followed by patients aged 12 to 17 (30.2
visits per 100,000 population) (Figure 2).
Visits Involving Misuse or Abuse of
Pharmaceuticals
In 2011, there were 458.3 ED visits per 100,000
population involving misuse or abuse of pharmaceuticals
(Table 2). The most commonly involved drugs were
anti-anxiety and insomnia medications (160.9 visits per
100,000 population) and narcotic pain relievers (134.8
visits per 100,000 population).
Among visits involving anti-anxiety and insomnia
medications, alprazolam (e.g., Xanax®) was the most
common at 49.4 visits per 100,000 population,
followed by clonazepam (e.g., Klonopin®) at 24.6 visits,
lorazepam (e.g., Ativan®) at 16.2 visits, and zolpidem
(e.g., Ambien®) at 11.9 visits. Oxycodone products were
the narcotic pain relievers most commonly involved in
ED visits (175,229 visits, or 56.2 visits per 100,000
population). Involvement of hydrocodone, methadone,
and morphine products followed oxycodone with
31.2, 24.3, and 12.3 visits per 100,000 population,
respectively. Narcotic pain relievers and anti-anxiety
and insomnia medications are often not specifically
identified by drug or brand name in the ED records, so
the actual involvement of specific drugs is likely higher
than reported here.
Other types of drugs with measurable involvement
included antidepressants (34.8 visits per 100,000
population) and antipsychotics (24.5 visits per 100,000
population). Drug classes with fewer than 20 visits
per 100,000 population included cardiovascular
medications (17.8 visits), muscle relaxants (17.0 visits),
respiratory medications (15.0 visits), and central
nervous system (CNS) stimulants (e.g., Adderall®,
Ritalin®; 14.5 visits).
Trends
The rate of ED visits involving misuse or abuse of
pharmaceuticals increased 114 percent from 214.0
visits per 100,000 population in 2004 to 458.3 visits
per 100,000 population in 2011. CNS stimulants
experienced the largest change in involvement with
a 292 percent increase. The rate of visits involving
anti-anxiety and insomnia medications increased
124 percent. Other drug groups experiencing lower
increases included respiratory medications (76 percent),
antipsychotics (71 percent), muscle relaxants (71
percent), cardiovascular medications (63 percent),
and anticonvulsants (51 percent). An exception to
the general upward trend occurred for visits involving
antidepressants, where involvement remained stable
from 2004 to 2011.
In respect to shorter term trends between 2009
and 2011, overall involvement of pharmaceuticals
increased by about 13 percent. Only two drug groups
showed significant increases from 2009 to 2011: visits
involving anti-anxiety and insomnia medications
increased 14 percent overall (although no single drug
had a significant increase), and visits involving CNS
stimulants increased 78 percent.
Age
Figure 3 depicts the rates of ED visits per 100,000
population for the major pharmaceutical drugs among
patients aged 12 to 17, aged 18 to 20, and aged 21 to
24 in 2011. Rates of visits for narcotic pain relievers
and anti-anxiety and insomnia medications rose for
each successively older age group. The rate of visits
involving CNS stimulants for those aged 12 to 17
was similar to that for those aged 18 to 20 but lower
than the rate for those aged 21 to 24. Visits involving
antipsychotics were less common among patients aged
12 to 17 than among patients in older age groups,
but there was no difference between the two older
age groups.
Visits Involving Alcohol
Involvement of alcohol is documented for all ED visits
that also involve pharmaceuticals or illicit drugs. Also,
because alcohol is considered an illicit drug for minors,
visits involving “alcohol only” are included in DAWN
for those aged 20 or younger. For the population
aged 20 or younger, the rate of ED visits involving
alcohol (with or without other drugs) is 215.8 visits
February 22, 2013
THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse
Warning Network (DAWN)
Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits
6
per 100,000 population. The majority of those visits
involved alcohol only (134.6 visits per 100,000
population). The rate of visits involving alcohol and
other drugs was 238.9 visits per 100,000 population for
patients aged 21 or older and 81.3 visits per 100,000
population for patients younger than 21. There have
been no long- or short-term changes in the rate of visits
involving drugs in combination with alcohol, or in
visits for alcohol only (for those aged 20 or younger).
Visits Involving Accidental Ingestion of Drugs
ED visits involving accidental ingestion of drugs are
most common among children aged 5 or younger, for
whom the rate was 317.8 visits per 100,000 population
in 2011. In the long term, this represents a 49 percent
increase over visits occurring in 2004 (213.9 ED visits
per 100,000 population). Involvement of narcotic pain
relievers and anti-anxiety and insomnia medications
increased from 2004 to 2011(data not shown). No
significant increases occurred from 2009 to 2011.
Visits Involving Adverse Reactions to Drugs
ED visits involving adverse reactions to pharmaceuticals
taken as prescribed or indicated increased 84 percent
between 2005 and 2011, from 1,250,377 visits in 2005
to 2,301,059 visits in 2011 (Figure 1).5 The rate for
adverse reactions ranged from 423.1 visits per 100,000
population in 2005 to 738.5 visits in 2011—a 75
percent increase. There have been no short-term
increases in the rate, however, since 2009.
In 2011, the highest rates of drug-related adverse
reactions were found among patients aged 65 or older,
with 1,525.8 visits per 100,000 population (data not
shown). Cardiovascular medications are often involved
in adverse reactions for patients aged 65 or older (273.1
visits per 100,000 population). Other common drugs
for older adults were anticoagulants (215.9 visits per
100,000 population aged 65 or older), drugs to treat
infections (225.5 visits), narcotic pain relievers (135.8
visits), drugs to treat diabetes (128.9 visits), and cancer
Figure 3. Rates of Emergency Department (ED) Visits Involving
Misuse or Abuse of Pharmaceuticals among
Patients Aged 12 to 24 per 100,000 Population, by Age Group:
2011
* All differences between age groups were statistically
significant at the .05 level.
** The difference between patients aged 12 to 17 and those
aged 21 to 24 was statistically significant at the .05 level.
*** The differences between patients age 12 to 17 and the two
older age groups were statistically significant at the .05 level.
Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network
(DAWN).
0
100
200
300
400
Narcotic Pain Relievers*
ED
V
is
it
s
pe
r
10
0,
00
0
Po
pu
la
ti
on
Anti-anxiety and Insomnia
Medications*
Persons Aged 12 to 17
Antidepressants Central Nervous System
Stimulants**
Pharmaceuticals
Antipsychotics***
Persons Aged 18 to 20
Persons Aged 21 to 24
38.4
157.2
306.2
73.3
179.7
318.5
37.0
50.7 57.2
31.3 33.9
56.0
15.1
29.5
40.8
February 22, 2013
THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse
Warning Network (DAWN)
Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits
7
drugs (128.8 visits). Visits involving anticoagulants,
narcotic pain relievers, and diabetes drugs decreased
(ranging from 19 to 38 percent decreases) from 2009
to 2011.
Discussion
A central finding of the 2011 DAWN is that
the involvement of certain commonly abused
pharmaceuticals in ED visits associated with drug
misuse or abuse did not change from 2009 to 2011.
There were no significant increases in the rates of visits
involving narcotic pain relievers from 2009 to 2011.
Visits involving anti-anxiety or insomnia medications
increased a small amount in general, but no specific
drugs in this category showed increases. Additionally,
no increases occurred from 2009 to 2011 for ED
visits involving adverse reactions to pharmaceuticals
overall. Pharmaceuticals continue to be involved at
a higher rate than illicit drugs, and further efforts
to educate the public and medical communities are
still needed to emphasize the difference between
appropriate therapeutic use and drug misuse or abuse.
Additional suggestions for methods to increase public
awareness, reduce nonmedical use, and control access to
pharmaceuticals are provided in the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention’s 2011 publication Policy
Impact: Prescription Painkiller Overdoses.7
A second critical finding of DAWN 2011 is that there
may be an increase in the involvement of illicit drugs.
After 5 years of relative stability, an upward trend was
observed between 2009 and 2011. Visits involving
marijuana, illicit stimulants, and synthetic cannabinoids
increased between 2009 and 2011. Involvement of legal
stimulants (e.g., CNS stimulants used to treat attention
deficit/hyperactivity disorder) also rose over this period.
These findings suggest the need to renew public health
messaging and deterrent activities targeted at illicit
drugs generally and illicit stimulants specifically.
The DAWN finding about drug involvement by
age serves primarily to remind the public health
community of the critical juncture in drug taking
behaviors that occurs during the adolescent and young
adult years. Although involvement of all illicit drugs
rose between the 12 to 17 and 18 to 20 age groups,
interventions focused on marijuana and other illicit
drugs (e.g., synthetic cannabinoids) are particularly
important for these age groups. Interventions for 18 to
20 and 21 to 24 age groups should focus on heroin,
cocaine, and illicit stimulants because the involvement
of these drugs in ED visits increased with increasing
age. Alcohol in combination with drugs persists as
a serious concern for all three age groups. It may be
beneficial to address misuse or abuse of anti-anxiety
and insomnia medications, narcotic pain relievers, and
antipsychotics as part of substance abuse prevention
efforts targeted at adolescents. The delayed increase in
involvement of CNS stimulants suggests that messaging
targeted to the older group of 21 to 24 year olds may
be needed.
End Notes
1. All types of drugs—illegal drugs, prescription and over-the-
counter
pharmaceuticals (e.g., dietary supplements, cough medicine),
and
substances inhaled for their psychoactive effects—are included.
2. Adverse reaction visits include adverse drug reactions, side
effects,
drug-drug interactions, and drug-alcohol interactions
experienced
when drugs are taken for therapeutic purpose as prescribed or
directed. Visits attributed to drug misuse or abuse include use
of illicit drugs, alcohol abuse by minors, and misuse or abuse of
pharmaceuticals in a manner other than prescribed or directed.
3. DAWN also collects information on ED visits to obtain
detoxification
or treatment services (0.25 million visits) and drug-related
suicide
attempts (0.23 million visits).
4. ED visits often involve multiple drugs. The sum of visits by
drug will
be greater than the total, and the sum of percentages by drug
will be
greater than 100.
5. DAWN data for ED visits involving adverse reactions in 2004
are not
analyzed or reported because of low statistical precision.
6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,
Center
for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (December 4,
2012). The
DAWN Report: Drug-related emergency department visits
involving
synthetic cannabinoids. Rockville, MD.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Policy
impact:
Prescription painkiller overdoses. Retrieved from
http://www.cdc.gov/
homeandrecreationalsafety/rxbrief/
Suggested Citation
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,
Center for
Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (February 22, 2013).
The DAWN
Report: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network
(DAWN)
Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits.
Rockville, MD.
http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/rxbrief/
http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/rxbrief/
February 22, 2013
THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse
Warning Network (DAWN)
Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits
8
The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) is a public health
surveillance
system that monitors drug-related morbidity and mortality.
DAWN uses
a probability sample of hospitals to produce estimates of drug-
related
emergency department (ED) visits for the United States and
selected
metropolitan areas annually. DAWN also produces annual
profiles of drug-
related deaths reviewed by medical examiners or coroners in
selected
metropolitan areas and States.
Any ED visit related to recent drug use is included in DAWN.
All types of
drugs—licit and illicit—are covered. Alcohol involvement is
documented for
patients of all ages if it occurs with another drug. Alcohol is
considered an
illicit drug for minors and is documented even if no other drug
is involved.
The classification of drugs used in DAWN is derived from the
Multum
Lexicon, copyright 2012 Lexi-Comp, Inc., and/or Cerner
Multum, Inc. The
Multum Licensing Agreement governing use of the Lexicon can
be found at
http://www.samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx.
DAWN is one of three major surveys conducted by the
Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services Administration’s Center for
Behavioral Health
Statistics and Quality (SAMHSA/CBHSQ). For more
information on other
CBHSQ surveys, go to http://www.samhsa.gov/data/. SAMHSA
has
contracts with Westat (Rockville, MD) and RTI International
(Research
Triangle Park, NC) to operate the DAWN system and produce
publications.
For publications and additional information about DAWN, go to
http://www.
samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
www.samhsa.gov/data
http://www.samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx
http://www.samhsa.gov/data/
http://www.samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx
http://www.samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx
http://www.samhsa.gov/data
New Assignment - PSY355
Part 1:
Briefly summarize the reading of the Dawn Report including the
major topics of the reading and
your opinions regarding the information contained in the
material (400 words or more).
Part 2:
Answer this question. (300 words or more).
What does the data from the latest Dawn Report tell you?
Anything in particular stand out
to you?

More Related Content

Similar to IN BRIEF X In 2011, there were 5.1 million drug-related em.docx

Rx15 pdmp tues_330_1_brown_2fondario_3quesinberry
Rx15 pdmp tues_330_1_brown_2fondario_3quesinberryRx15 pdmp tues_330_1_brown_2fondario_3quesinberry
Rx15 pdmp tues_330_1_brown_2fondario_3quesinberryOPUNITE
 
OR PDMP Program Details 2014
OR PDMP Program Details 2014OR PDMP Program Details 2014
OR PDMP Program Details 2014Paul Coelho, MD
 
Rx15 vision wed_200_ondcp_1_labelle_2jones_3spitznas
Rx15 vision wed_200_ondcp_1_labelle_2jones_3spitznasRx15 vision wed_200_ondcp_1_labelle_2jones_3spitznas
Rx15 vision wed_200_ondcp_1_labelle_2jones_3spitznasOPUNITE
 
Pain & Addiction 2009
Pain & Addiction 2009Pain & Addiction 2009
Pain & Addiction 2009Stacy Seikel
 
profile of adverse drug reactions in a rural tertiary care hospital
profile of adverse drug reactions in a rural tertiary care hospital profile of adverse drug reactions in a rural tertiary care hospital
profile of adverse drug reactions in a rural tertiary care hospital Naser Tadvi
 
9 interesting things about alcohol and other drugs - 29 July
9 interesting things about alcohol and other drugs - 29 July9 interesting things about alcohol and other drugs - 29 July
9 interesting things about alcohol and other drugs - 29 JulyAndrew Brown
 
Henry Spiller edited
Henry Spiller editedHenry Spiller edited
Henry Spiller editedOPUNITE
 
Realities of addiction_volkow-final
Realities of addiction_volkow-finalRealities of addiction_volkow-final
Realities of addiction_volkow-finalOPUNITE
 
Phamarcovigilance newsletter 9
Phamarcovigilance newsletter 9Phamarcovigilance newsletter 9
Phamarcovigilance newsletter 9george dindah
 
Adverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug ReactionAdverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug ReactionNishu Vora
 
Adverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug ReactionAdverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug ReactionNishu Vora
 
Adverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug ReactionAdverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug ReactionNishu Vora
 
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3greenRx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3greenOPUNITE
 
Assessment of drug utilization and rational drug use on WHO indication
Assessment of drug utilization and rational drug use on WHO indicationAssessment of drug utilization and rational drug use on WHO indication
Assessment of drug utilization and rational drug use on WHO indicationZaibaFathima8
 
Green pt1 state-pmp
Green pt1 state-pmpGreen pt1 state-pmp
Green pt1 state-pmpWelcome40
 

Similar to IN BRIEF X In 2011, there were 5.1 million drug-related em.docx (20)

Rx15 pdmp tues_330_1_brown_2fondario_3quesinberry
Rx15 pdmp tues_330_1_brown_2fondario_3quesinberryRx15 pdmp tues_330_1_brown_2fondario_3quesinberry
Rx15 pdmp tues_330_1_brown_2fondario_3quesinberry
 
J IAJPS Immanuels
J IAJPS ImmanuelsJ IAJPS Immanuels
J IAJPS Immanuels
 
OR PDMP Program Details 2014
OR PDMP Program Details 2014OR PDMP Program Details 2014
OR PDMP Program Details 2014
 
Rx15 vision wed_200_ondcp_1_labelle_2jones_3spitznas
Rx15 vision wed_200_ondcp_1_labelle_2jones_3spitznasRx15 vision wed_200_ondcp_1_labelle_2jones_3spitznas
Rx15 vision wed_200_ondcp_1_labelle_2jones_3spitznas
 
Pain & Addiction 2009
Pain & Addiction 2009Pain & Addiction 2009
Pain & Addiction 2009
 
profile of adverse drug reactions in a rural tertiary care hospital
profile of adverse drug reactions in a rural tertiary care hospital profile of adverse drug reactions in a rural tertiary care hospital
profile of adverse drug reactions in a rural tertiary care hospital
 
9 interesting things about alcohol and other drugs - 29 July
9 interesting things about alcohol and other drugs - 29 July9 interesting things about alcohol and other drugs - 29 July
9 interesting things about alcohol and other drugs - 29 July
 
Henry Spiller edited
Henry Spiller editedHenry Spiller edited
Henry Spiller edited
 
Opioid Refill Clinic
Opioid Refill ClinicOpioid Refill Clinic
Opioid Refill Clinic
 
Realities of addiction_volkow-final
Realities of addiction_volkow-finalRealities of addiction_volkow-final
Realities of addiction_volkow-final
 
Phamarcovigilance newsletter 9
Phamarcovigilance newsletter 9Phamarcovigilance newsletter 9
Phamarcovigilance newsletter 9
 
Adverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug ReactionAdverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug Reaction
 
Adverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug ReactionAdverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug Reaction
 
Adverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug ReactionAdverse Drug Reaction
Adverse Drug Reaction
 
Survey 2009drugod
Survey 2009drugodSurvey 2009drugod
Survey 2009drugod
 
Twillman preventing rx abuse
Twillman preventing rx abuseTwillman preventing rx abuse
Twillman preventing rx abuse
 
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3greenRx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
Rx16 federal tues_200_1_gladden_2halpin_3green
 
Assessment of drug utilization and rational drug use on WHO indication
Assessment of drug utilization and rational drug use on WHO indicationAssessment of drug utilization and rational drug use on WHO indication
Assessment of drug utilization and rational drug use on WHO indication
 
Green pt1 state-pmp
Green pt1 state-pmpGreen pt1 state-pmp
Green pt1 state-pmp
 
Patterns Poster
Patterns PosterPatterns Poster
Patterns Poster
 

More from wilcockiris

Barbara Silva is the CIO for Peachtree Community Hospital in Atlanta.docx
Barbara Silva is the CIO for Peachtree Community Hospital in Atlanta.docxBarbara Silva is the CIO for Peachtree Community Hospital in Atlanta.docx
Barbara Silva is the CIO for Peachtree Community Hospital in Atlanta.docxwilcockiris
 
BARGAIN CITY Your career is moving along faster than you e.docx
BARGAIN CITY Your career is moving along faster than you e.docxBARGAIN CITY Your career is moving along faster than you e.docx
BARGAIN CITY Your career is moving along faster than you e.docxwilcockiris
 
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic  managers. T.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic  managers. T.docxBarbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic  managers. T.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic  managers. T.docxwilcockiris
 
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers.docxBarbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers.docxwilcockiris
 
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers. Th.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers. Th.docxBarbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers. Th.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers. Th.docxwilcockiris
 
Barbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages 4th edition (U.docx
Barbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages 4th edition (U.docxBarbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages 4th edition (U.docx
Barbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages 4th edition (U.docxwilcockiris
 
BARBARA NGAM, MPAShoreline, WA 98155 ▪ 801.317.5999 ▪ [email pro.docx
BARBARA NGAM, MPAShoreline, WA 98155 ▪ 801.317.5999 ▪ [email pro.docxBARBARA NGAM, MPAShoreline, WA 98155 ▪ 801.317.5999 ▪ [email pro.docx
BARBARA NGAM, MPAShoreline, WA 98155 ▪ 801.317.5999 ▪ [email pro.docxwilcockiris
 
Banks 5Maya BanksProfessor Debra MartinEN106DLGU1A2018.docx
Banks    5Maya BanksProfessor Debra MartinEN106DLGU1A2018.docxBanks    5Maya BanksProfessor Debra MartinEN106DLGU1A2018.docx
Banks 5Maya BanksProfessor Debra MartinEN106DLGU1A2018.docxwilcockiris
 
Banking industry•Databases that storeocorporate sensiti.docx
Banking industry•Databases that storeocorporate sensiti.docxBanking industry•Databases that storeocorporate sensiti.docx
Banking industry•Databases that storeocorporate sensiti.docxwilcockiris
 
BAOL 531 Managerial AccountingWeek Three Article Research Pape.docx
BAOL 531 Managerial AccountingWeek Three Article Research Pape.docxBAOL 531 Managerial AccountingWeek Three Article Research Pape.docx
BAOL 531 Managerial AccountingWeek Three Article Research Pape.docxwilcockiris
 
bankCustomer1223333SmithJamesbbbbbb12345 Abrams Rd Dallas TX 75043.docx
bankCustomer1223333SmithJamesbbbbbb12345 Abrams Rd Dallas TX 75043.docxbankCustomer1223333SmithJamesbbbbbb12345 Abrams Rd Dallas TX 75043.docx
bankCustomer1223333SmithJamesbbbbbb12345 Abrams Rd Dallas TX 75043.docxwilcockiris
 
Barbara and Judi entered into a contract with Linda, which provi.docx
Barbara and Judi entered into a contract with Linda, which provi.docxBarbara and Judi entered into a contract with Linda, which provi.docx
Barbara and Judi entered into a contract with Linda, which provi.docxwilcockiris
 
bappsum.indd 614 182014 30258 PMHuman Reso.docx
bappsum.indd   614 182014   30258 PMHuman Reso.docxbappsum.indd   614 182014   30258 PMHuman Reso.docx
bappsum.indd 614 182014 30258 PMHuman Reso.docxwilcockiris
 
Bank ReservesSuppose that the reserve ratio is .25, and that a b.docx
Bank ReservesSuppose that the reserve ratio is .25, and that a b.docxBank ReservesSuppose that the reserve ratio is .25, and that a b.docx
Bank ReservesSuppose that the reserve ratio is .25, and that a b.docxwilcockiris
 
Bank Services, Grading GuideFIN366 Version 21Individual.docx
Bank Services, Grading GuideFIN366 Version 21Individual.docxBank Services, Grading GuideFIN366 Version 21Individual.docx
Bank Services, Grading GuideFIN366 Version 21Individual.docxwilcockiris
 
Baldwins Kentucky Revised Statutes AnnotatedTitle XXXV. Domesti.docx
Baldwins Kentucky Revised Statutes AnnotatedTitle XXXV. Domesti.docxBaldwins Kentucky Revised Statutes AnnotatedTitle XXXV. Domesti.docx
Baldwins Kentucky Revised Statutes AnnotatedTitle XXXV. Domesti.docxwilcockiris
 
Bank confirmations are critical to the cash audit. What information .docx
Bank confirmations are critical to the cash audit. What information .docxBank confirmations are critical to the cash audit. What information .docx
Bank confirmations are critical to the cash audit. What information .docxwilcockiris
 
BalShtBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetThe Fran.docx
BalShtBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetThe Fran.docxBalShtBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetThe Fran.docx
BalShtBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetThe Fran.docxwilcockiris
 
BAM 515 - Organizational Behavior(Enter your answers on th.docx
BAM 515 - Organizational Behavior(Enter your answers on th.docxBAM 515 - Organizational Behavior(Enter your answers on th.docx
BAM 515 - Organizational Behavior(Enter your answers on th.docxwilcockiris
 
BalanchineGeorge Balanchine is an important figure in the histor.docx
BalanchineGeorge Balanchine is an important figure in the histor.docxBalanchineGeorge Balanchine is an important figure in the histor.docx
BalanchineGeorge Balanchine is an important figure in the histor.docxwilcockiris
 

More from wilcockiris (20)

Barbara Silva is the CIO for Peachtree Community Hospital in Atlanta.docx
Barbara Silva is the CIO for Peachtree Community Hospital in Atlanta.docxBarbara Silva is the CIO for Peachtree Community Hospital in Atlanta.docx
Barbara Silva is the CIO for Peachtree Community Hospital in Atlanta.docx
 
BARGAIN CITY Your career is moving along faster than you e.docx
BARGAIN CITY Your career is moving along faster than you e.docxBARGAIN CITY Your career is moving along faster than you e.docx
BARGAIN CITY Your career is moving along faster than you e.docx
 
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic  managers. T.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic  managers. T.docxBarbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic  managers. T.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic  managers. T.docx
 
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers.docxBarbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers.docx
 
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers. Th.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers. Th.docxBarbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers. Th.docx
Barbara schedules a meeting with a core group of clinic managers. Th.docx
 
Barbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages 4th edition (U.docx
Barbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages 4th edition (U.docxBarbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages 4th edition (U.docx
Barbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages 4th edition (U.docx
 
BARBARA NGAM, MPAShoreline, WA 98155 ▪ 801.317.5999 ▪ [email pro.docx
BARBARA NGAM, MPAShoreline, WA 98155 ▪ 801.317.5999 ▪ [email pro.docxBARBARA NGAM, MPAShoreline, WA 98155 ▪ 801.317.5999 ▪ [email pro.docx
BARBARA NGAM, MPAShoreline, WA 98155 ▪ 801.317.5999 ▪ [email pro.docx
 
Banks 5Maya BanksProfessor Debra MartinEN106DLGU1A2018.docx
Banks    5Maya BanksProfessor Debra MartinEN106DLGU1A2018.docxBanks    5Maya BanksProfessor Debra MartinEN106DLGU1A2018.docx
Banks 5Maya BanksProfessor Debra MartinEN106DLGU1A2018.docx
 
Banking industry•Databases that storeocorporate sensiti.docx
Banking industry•Databases that storeocorporate sensiti.docxBanking industry•Databases that storeocorporate sensiti.docx
Banking industry•Databases that storeocorporate sensiti.docx
 
BAOL 531 Managerial AccountingWeek Three Article Research Pape.docx
BAOL 531 Managerial AccountingWeek Three Article Research Pape.docxBAOL 531 Managerial AccountingWeek Three Article Research Pape.docx
BAOL 531 Managerial AccountingWeek Three Article Research Pape.docx
 
bankCustomer1223333SmithJamesbbbbbb12345 Abrams Rd Dallas TX 75043.docx
bankCustomer1223333SmithJamesbbbbbb12345 Abrams Rd Dallas TX 75043.docxbankCustomer1223333SmithJamesbbbbbb12345 Abrams Rd Dallas TX 75043.docx
bankCustomer1223333SmithJamesbbbbbb12345 Abrams Rd Dallas TX 75043.docx
 
Barbara and Judi entered into a contract with Linda, which provi.docx
Barbara and Judi entered into a contract with Linda, which provi.docxBarbara and Judi entered into a contract with Linda, which provi.docx
Barbara and Judi entered into a contract with Linda, which provi.docx
 
bappsum.indd 614 182014 30258 PMHuman Reso.docx
bappsum.indd   614 182014   30258 PMHuman Reso.docxbappsum.indd   614 182014   30258 PMHuman Reso.docx
bappsum.indd 614 182014 30258 PMHuman Reso.docx
 
Bank ReservesSuppose that the reserve ratio is .25, and that a b.docx
Bank ReservesSuppose that the reserve ratio is .25, and that a b.docxBank ReservesSuppose that the reserve ratio is .25, and that a b.docx
Bank ReservesSuppose that the reserve ratio is .25, and that a b.docx
 
Bank Services, Grading GuideFIN366 Version 21Individual.docx
Bank Services, Grading GuideFIN366 Version 21Individual.docxBank Services, Grading GuideFIN366 Version 21Individual.docx
Bank Services, Grading GuideFIN366 Version 21Individual.docx
 
Baldwins Kentucky Revised Statutes AnnotatedTitle XXXV. Domesti.docx
Baldwins Kentucky Revised Statutes AnnotatedTitle XXXV. Domesti.docxBaldwins Kentucky Revised Statutes AnnotatedTitle XXXV. Domesti.docx
Baldwins Kentucky Revised Statutes AnnotatedTitle XXXV. Domesti.docx
 
Bank confirmations are critical to the cash audit. What information .docx
Bank confirmations are critical to the cash audit. What information .docxBank confirmations are critical to the cash audit. What information .docx
Bank confirmations are critical to the cash audit. What information .docx
 
BalShtBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetThe Fran.docx
BalShtBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetThe Fran.docxBalShtBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetThe Fran.docx
BalShtBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetBalance SheetThe Fran.docx
 
BAM 515 - Organizational Behavior(Enter your answers on th.docx
BAM 515 - Organizational Behavior(Enter your answers on th.docxBAM 515 - Organizational Behavior(Enter your answers on th.docx
BAM 515 - Organizational Behavior(Enter your answers on th.docx
 
BalanchineGeorge Balanchine is an important figure in the histor.docx
BalanchineGeorge Balanchine is an important figure in the histor.docxBalanchineGeorge Balanchine is an important figure in the histor.docx
BalanchineGeorge Balanchine is an important figure in the histor.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfAyushMahapatra5
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Disha Kariya
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfchloefrazer622
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfagholdier
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...fonyou31
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactPECB
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAssociation for Project Management
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhikauryashika82
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 

IN BRIEF X In 2011, there were 5.1 million drug-related em.docx

  • 1. IN BRIEF X In 2011, there were 5.1 million drug-related emergency department (ED) visits; about one half (49 percent) were attributed to drug misuse or abuse with a nearly equal percentage (45 percent) attributed to adverse drug reactions X ED visits involving use of illicit drugs were relatively stable from 2004 (991,640 visits) to 2009 (974,392 visits) but increased from 2009 to 2011 (1,252,500 visits); between 2009 and 2011, the rate of visits involving illicit stimulants increased 68 percent, and the rate of visits involving marijuana rose 19 percent X ED visits involving misuse or abuse of pharmaceuticals increased from 2004 (626,470 visits) through 2011 (1,428,145 visits); the most commonly involved drugs were anti-anxiety and insomnia medications and narcotic pain relievers (160.9 and 134.8 visits per 100,000 population, respectively)
  • 2. X ED visits involving adverse reactions to drugs increased from 1,250,377 visits in 2005 to 2,287,271 visits in 2009; however, no increase occurred between 2009 and 2011 (2,301,059 visits) The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) provides nationally representative patient demographic and visit-level information on emergency department (ED) visits resulting from substance misuse or abuse, adverse reactions to drugs taken as prescribed or directed, accidental ingestion of drugs, drug-related suicide attempts, and ED admissions for substance abuse treatment. The year 2011 marks the eighth year that the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has collected data on drug-related ED visits in the Nation using the new sampling and study design introduced in 2004. This report highlights 2011 findings from DAWN with comparisons to 2004 and 2009 for visits involving illicit drug use, misuse or abuse of pharmaceuticals, alcohol use, adverse reactions to drugs, and accidental ingestions. Multiyear data collection affords the opportunity to track the level of drug involvement in medical emergencies in the Nation and alert the public health community to changing patterns of drug use and misuse. Analyses by patient age and type of drug yield further insight into critical age- specific characteristics associated with drug use and misuse
  • 3. behaviors. Such information is critical to anticipating changes in drug use behaviors and developing programmatic responses in a timely fashion, particularly for vulnerable populations such as adolescents and young adults. A more thorough analysis of 2011 and previous data will be available at the SAMHSA website (http://www.samhsa.gov/data/), including a comprehensive set of detailed tables that display drug- specific ED visit counts by various patient demographics and visit characteristics for the Nation and select metropolitan areas. DAWN analyses and tables are used by the Federal, State, and local public health communities to guide the development of substance abuse intervention policy and evaluate programmatic efforts targeted at the prevention, intervention, and treatment of drug use and abuse. In addition, public health agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration, Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits DAWN_127 February 22, 2013
  • 4. http://www.samhsa.gov/data/ February 22, 2013 THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits 2 Figure 1. Reasons for Drug-Related Emergency Department (ED) Visits, by Year: 2004 to 2011 * The estimate for ED visits involving adverse reactions in 2004 was suppressed due to low statistical precision. Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). pharmaceutical companies, and health researchers track DAWN data to monitor life-threatening effects of medications. Such information is used to inform drug scheduling, drug labeling, and other public health policy and program decision making. For this report, all changes over time and between age groups are measured by comparing the rate of ED visits per 100,000 population, not point estimates. All reported differences in rates are significant at the .05 level. Overview In 2011, there were 5.1 million drug-related ED visits (Table 1).1 About one half (49 percent, or 2.5 million visits) were attributed to drug misuse or abuse with
  • 5. a nearly equal number (45 percent, or 2.3 million visits) attributed to adverse drug reactions.2,3 Among visits involving drug misuse or abuse, 1.4 million visits involved pharmaceuticals, and 1.3 million involved illicit drugs.4 Visits involving use of illicit drugs were relatively stable from 2004 (991,640 visits) to 2009 (974,392 visits) but increased from 2009 to 2011 (1,252,500 visits) (Figure 1). The trend in visits involving misuse or abuse of pharmaceuticals displayed a steady upward climb from 2004 (626,470 visits) through 2011 (1,428,145 visits). Visits involving adverse reactions to drugs increased from 1,250,377 visits in 2005 to Table 1. Reasons for Drug-Related Emergency Department (ED) Visits, by Patient Demographic and Visit Characteristics: 2011 Reason for Visit Number of ED Visits Percent of ED Visits Percent of ED Visits Involving a Patient Aged 21 or Older Percent of ED Visits Involving a Male Patient Percent of ED Visits Resulting in Admission to the Hospital
  • 6. Percent of ED Visits Involving a Single Drug Total ED Visits 5,067,374 100 81 48 24 66 Drug Misuse or Abuse* 2,462,948 49 82 56 25 51 Pharmaceuticals 1,428,145 28 87 50 27 41 Illicit Drugs 1,252,500 25 85 65 24 44 Adverse Reaction 2,301,059 45 82 39 21 82 Accidental Ingestion 113,624 2 26 50 10 86 * Because multiple drugs may be involved in each visit, estimates of visits by drug may add to more than the total, and percentages may add to more than 100 percent. Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). Misuse or Abuse of Pharmaceuticals Adverse Reactions* 0 500,000 1,000,000 2,000,000
  • 7. 1,500,000 2,500,000 2006 2008 201120102004 2005 2007 2009 N um be r of E D V is it s lllicit Drug Use 1,250,377 1,526,010 1,908,928 2,157,128 2,287,271 2,329,221 2,301,059 991,640 922,018 958,866 984,749 1,126,403
  • 8. 1,243,606 1,344,393 1,428,145 626,470 765,314 859,136 974,852 994,583 974,392 1,172,276 1,252,500 February 22, 2013 THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits 3 2,287,271 visits in 2009; however, no increases occurred between 2009 and 2011 (2,301,059 visits).5 Patient Demographics and Visit Characteristics Slightly more than 80 percent of drug-related ED visits were made by adults aged 21 or older, 48 percent were male, 24 percent resulted in the patient being admitted to the hospital, and 66 percent involved a single drug (Table 1). Among visits involving misuse or abuse of drugs, 82 percent were made by adults aged 21 or older, 56 percent were made by males, 25 percent resulted in the patient being admitted to the hospital, and
  • 9. 51 percent involved a single drug. Visits for adverse reactions typically involved a single drug (82 percent), and one fifth of patients were admitted to the hospital (21 percent). Visits for accidental ingestions typically involved patients aged 20 or younger, the majority (86 percent) involved a single drug, and a small portion (10 percent) were admitted to the hospital. Visits Involving Illicit Drugs In 2011, there were 402.0 ED visits per 100,000 population involving illicit drugs (Table 2). The most commonly involved drug was cocaine, with Table 2. Selected Substances Involved in Drug-Related Emergency Department (ED) Visits for Misuse or Abuse of Drugs: 2004, 2009, and 2011 Drug Number of ED Visits in 2011* Rate of ED Visits per 100,000 Population in 2011 Percent Change, 2004 to 2011** Percent Change, 2009 to 2011** Total ED Visits 2,462,948 790.4 52 19 Illicit Drugs 1,252,500 402.0 NC 27
  • 10. Cocaine 505,224 162.1 NC NC Marijuana 455,668 146.2 52 19 Heroin 258,482 83.0 NC NC Illicit Stimulants 159,840 51.3 NC 68 Other Illicit Drugs 131,178 42.1 86 60 Pharmaceuticals 1,428,145 458.3 114 13 Anti-anxiety and Insomnia Medications 501,207 160.9 124 14 Alprazolam 154,016 49.4 155 NC Clonazepam 76,557 24.6 122 NC Lorazepam 50,399 16.2 127 NC Zolpidem 37,225 11.9 152 NC Narcotic Pain Relievers 420,040 134.8 153 NC Oxycodone Products 175,229 56.2 220 NC Hydrocodone Products 97,183 31.2 96 NC Methadone 75,693 24.3 74 NC Morphine Products 38,416 12.3 144 NC Antidepressants 108,388 34.8 NC NC Antipsychotics 76,197 24.5 71 NC Cardiovascular Medications 55,543 17.8 63 NC Anticonvulsants 53,142 17.1 51 NC Muscle Relaxants 52,830 17.0 71 NC Respiratory Medications 46,819 15.0 76 NC Central Nervous System Stimulants 45,158 14.5 292 78 NC = no significant change. * Because multiple drugs may be involved in each visit, estimates of visits by drug may add to more than the total. ** Percent change is measured as the difference in the rates of visits per 100,000 population between years. Reported changes are significant at the .05 level.
  • 11. Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). February 22, 2013 THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits 4 162.1 visits per 100,000 population. This was closely followed by marijuana, which was involved in 146.2 visits per 100,000 population. Other drugs had lower rates: heroin (83.0 visits per 100,000 population), illicit stimulants (predominately amphetamines and methamphetamine; 51.3 visits per 100,000 population), and other illicit drugs (predominately PCP and various hallucinogens; 42.1 visits per 100,000 population). Trends ED visits involving use of illicit drugs were relatively stable from 2004 (991,640 visits) to 2009 (974,392 visits) but increased from 2009 to 2011 (1,252,500 visits). Between 2009 and 2011, the rate of visits involving illicit stimulants increased 68 percent, the rate of visits involving other illicit drugs (e.g., PCP, hallucinogens) rose 60 percent, and the rate of visits involving marijuana rose 19 percent (Table 2). Cocaine and heroin involvement changed in neither the long term from 2004 to 2011 nor the short term from 2009 to 2011. Age
  • 12. Figure 2 depicts the rates of ED visits per 100,000 population for the major illicit drug categories among patients aged 12 to 17, aged 18 to 20, and aged 21 to 24. Rates of visits for heroin, cocaine, and illicit stimulants rose for each successively older age group. Visits involving marijuana were less common among patients aged 12 to 17 (240.2 visits per 100,000 population) compared with the older age groups, but there was no difference between those aged 18 to 20 (443.8 visits per 100,000 population) and those aged 21 to 24 (446.9 visits per 100,000 population). Visits Involving Synthetic Cannabinoids Synthetic cannabinoids first appeared in DAWN records in 2009, but there were too few visits to be reported. By 2010, ED visits involving synthetic cannabinoids rose to a reportable level for the Nation (3.7 visits per 100,000 population).6 By 2011, there were 9.2 visits per 100,000 population involving synthetic cannabinoids across all age groups—about Figure 2. Rates of Emergency Department (ED) Visits Involving Illicit Drugs among Patients Aged 12 to 24 per 100,000 Population, by Age Group: 2011 * The differences between those aged 12 to 17 and the two older age groups were statistically significant at the .05 level. **All differences between age groups were statistically significant at the .05 level. Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). 0
  • 14. Heroin** Persons Aged 12 to 17 Cocaine** Illicit Stimulants** Illicit Drugs Synthetic Cannabinoids** Persons Aged 18 to 20 Persons Aged 21 to 24 240.2 443.8 446.9 8.5 134.6 266.1 23.5 112.5 214.4 23.5 89.8 141.5
  • 15. 30.2 60.8 16.3 February 22, 2013 THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits 5 a 150 percent increase (data not shown). The rate of visits involving synthetic cannabinoids was highest among patients aged 18 to 20 (60.8 visits per 100,000 population), followed by patients aged 12 to 17 (30.2 visits per 100,000 population) (Figure 2). Visits Involving Misuse or Abuse of Pharmaceuticals In 2011, there were 458.3 ED visits per 100,000 population involving misuse or abuse of pharmaceuticals (Table 2). The most commonly involved drugs were anti-anxiety and insomnia medications (160.9 visits per 100,000 population) and narcotic pain relievers (134.8 visits per 100,000 population). Among visits involving anti-anxiety and insomnia medications, alprazolam (e.g., Xanax®) was the most common at 49.4 visits per 100,000 population, followed by clonazepam (e.g., Klonopin®) at 24.6 visits, lorazepam (e.g., Ativan®) at 16.2 visits, and zolpidem (e.g., Ambien®) at 11.9 visits. Oxycodone products were the narcotic pain relievers most commonly involved in
  • 16. ED visits (175,229 visits, or 56.2 visits per 100,000 population). Involvement of hydrocodone, methadone, and morphine products followed oxycodone with 31.2, 24.3, and 12.3 visits per 100,000 population, respectively. Narcotic pain relievers and anti-anxiety and insomnia medications are often not specifically identified by drug or brand name in the ED records, so the actual involvement of specific drugs is likely higher than reported here. Other types of drugs with measurable involvement included antidepressants (34.8 visits per 100,000 population) and antipsychotics (24.5 visits per 100,000 population). Drug classes with fewer than 20 visits per 100,000 population included cardiovascular medications (17.8 visits), muscle relaxants (17.0 visits), respiratory medications (15.0 visits), and central nervous system (CNS) stimulants (e.g., Adderall®, Ritalin®; 14.5 visits). Trends The rate of ED visits involving misuse or abuse of pharmaceuticals increased 114 percent from 214.0 visits per 100,000 population in 2004 to 458.3 visits per 100,000 population in 2011. CNS stimulants experienced the largest change in involvement with a 292 percent increase. The rate of visits involving anti-anxiety and insomnia medications increased 124 percent. Other drug groups experiencing lower increases included respiratory medications (76 percent), antipsychotics (71 percent), muscle relaxants (71 percent), cardiovascular medications (63 percent), and anticonvulsants (51 percent). An exception to the general upward trend occurred for visits involving antidepressants, where involvement remained stable
  • 17. from 2004 to 2011. In respect to shorter term trends between 2009 and 2011, overall involvement of pharmaceuticals increased by about 13 percent. Only two drug groups showed significant increases from 2009 to 2011: visits involving anti-anxiety and insomnia medications increased 14 percent overall (although no single drug had a significant increase), and visits involving CNS stimulants increased 78 percent. Age Figure 3 depicts the rates of ED visits per 100,000 population for the major pharmaceutical drugs among patients aged 12 to 17, aged 18 to 20, and aged 21 to 24 in 2011. Rates of visits for narcotic pain relievers and anti-anxiety and insomnia medications rose for each successively older age group. The rate of visits involving CNS stimulants for those aged 12 to 17 was similar to that for those aged 18 to 20 but lower than the rate for those aged 21 to 24. Visits involving antipsychotics were less common among patients aged 12 to 17 than among patients in older age groups, but there was no difference between the two older age groups. Visits Involving Alcohol Involvement of alcohol is documented for all ED visits that also involve pharmaceuticals or illicit drugs. Also, because alcohol is considered an illicit drug for minors, visits involving “alcohol only” are included in DAWN for those aged 20 or younger. For the population aged 20 or younger, the rate of ED visits involving alcohol (with or without other drugs) is 215.8 visits
  • 18. February 22, 2013 THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits 6 per 100,000 population. The majority of those visits involved alcohol only (134.6 visits per 100,000 population). The rate of visits involving alcohol and other drugs was 238.9 visits per 100,000 population for patients aged 21 or older and 81.3 visits per 100,000 population for patients younger than 21. There have been no long- or short-term changes in the rate of visits involving drugs in combination with alcohol, or in visits for alcohol only (for those aged 20 or younger). Visits Involving Accidental Ingestion of Drugs ED visits involving accidental ingestion of drugs are most common among children aged 5 or younger, for whom the rate was 317.8 visits per 100,000 population in 2011. In the long term, this represents a 49 percent increase over visits occurring in 2004 (213.9 ED visits per 100,000 population). Involvement of narcotic pain relievers and anti-anxiety and insomnia medications increased from 2004 to 2011(data not shown). No significant increases occurred from 2009 to 2011. Visits Involving Adverse Reactions to Drugs ED visits involving adverse reactions to pharmaceuticals taken as prescribed or indicated increased 84 percent between 2005 and 2011, from 1,250,377 visits in 2005 to 2,301,059 visits in 2011 (Figure 1).5 The rate for adverse reactions ranged from 423.1 visits per 100,000 population in 2005 to 738.5 visits in 2011—a 75
  • 19. percent increase. There have been no short-term increases in the rate, however, since 2009. In 2011, the highest rates of drug-related adverse reactions were found among patients aged 65 or older, with 1,525.8 visits per 100,000 population (data not shown). Cardiovascular medications are often involved in adverse reactions for patients aged 65 or older (273.1 visits per 100,000 population). Other common drugs for older adults were anticoagulants (215.9 visits per 100,000 population aged 65 or older), drugs to treat infections (225.5 visits), narcotic pain relievers (135.8 visits), drugs to treat diabetes (128.9 visits), and cancer Figure 3. Rates of Emergency Department (ED) Visits Involving Misuse or Abuse of Pharmaceuticals among Patients Aged 12 to 24 per 100,000 Population, by Age Group: 2011 * All differences between age groups were statistically significant at the .05 level. ** The difference between patients aged 12 to 17 and those aged 21 to 24 was statistically significant at the .05 level. *** The differences between patients age 12 to 17 and the two older age groups were statistically significant at the .05 level. Source: 2011 SAMHSA Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). 0 100 200
  • 21. Antidepressants Central Nervous System Stimulants** Pharmaceuticals Antipsychotics*** Persons Aged 18 to 20 Persons Aged 21 to 24 38.4 157.2 306.2 73.3 179.7 318.5 37.0 50.7 57.2 31.3 33.9 56.0 15.1 29.5 40.8
  • 22. February 22, 2013 THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits 7 drugs (128.8 visits). Visits involving anticoagulants, narcotic pain relievers, and diabetes drugs decreased (ranging from 19 to 38 percent decreases) from 2009 to 2011. Discussion A central finding of the 2011 DAWN is that the involvement of certain commonly abused pharmaceuticals in ED visits associated with drug misuse or abuse did not change from 2009 to 2011. There were no significant increases in the rates of visits involving narcotic pain relievers from 2009 to 2011. Visits involving anti-anxiety or insomnia medications increased a small amount in general, but no specific drugs in this category showed increases. Additionally, no increases occurred from 2009 to 2011 for ED visits involving adverse reactions to pharmaceuticals overall. Pharmaceuticals continue to be involved at a higher rate than illicit drugs, and further efforts to educate the public and medical communities are still needed to emphasize the difference between appropriate therapeutic use and drug misuse or abuse. Additional suggestions for methods to increase public awareness, reduce nonmedical use, and control access to pharmaceuticals are provided in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2011 publication Policy Impact: Prescription Painkiller Overdoses.7 A second critical finding of DAWN 2011 is that there
  • 23. may be an increase in the involvement of illicit drugs. After 5 years of relative stability, an upward trend was observed between 2009 and 2011. Visits involving marijuana, illicit stimulants, and synthetic cannabinoids increased between 2009 and 2011. Involvement of legal stimulants (e.g., CNS stimulants used to treat attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder) also rose over this period. These findings suggest the need to renew public health messaging and deterrent activities targeted at illicit drugs generally and illicit stimulants specifically. The DAWN finding about drug involvement by age serves primarily to remind the public health community of the critical juncture in drug taking behaviors that occurs during the adolescent and young adult years. Although involvement of all illicit drugs rose between the 12 to 17 and 18 to 20 age groups, interventions focused on marijuana and other illicit drugs (e.g., synthetic cannabinoids) are particularly important for these age groups. Interventions for 18 to 20 and 21 to 24 age groups should focus on heroin, cocaine, and illicit stimulants because the involvement of these drugs in ED visits increased with increasing age. Alcohol in combination with drugs persists as a serious concern for all three age groups. It may be beneficial to address misuse or abuse of anti-anxiety and insomnia medications, narcotic pain relievers, and antipsychotics as part of substance abuse prevention efforts targeted at adolescents. The delayed increase in involvement of CNS stimulants suggests that messaging targeted to the older group of 21 to 24 year olds may be needed. End Notes 1. All types of drugs—illegal drugs, prescription and over-the-
  • 24. counter pharmaceuticals (e.g., dietary supplements, cough medicine), and substances inhaled for their psychoactive effects—are included. 2. Adverse reaction visits include adverse drug reactions, side effects, drug-drug interactions, and drug-alcohol interactions experienced when drugs are taken for therapeutic purpose as prescribed or directed. Visits attributed to drug misuse or abuse include use of illicit drugs, alcohol abuse by minors, and misuse or abuse of pharmaceuticals in a manner other than prescribed or directed. 3. DAWN also collects information on ED visits to obtain detoxification or treatment services (0.25 million visits) and drug-related suicide attempts (0.23 million visits). 4. ED visits often involve multiple drugs. The sum of visits by drug will be greater than the total, and the sum of percentages by drug will be greater than 100. 5. DAWN data for ED visits involving adverse reactions in 2004 are not analyzed or reported because of low statistical precision. 6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (December 4, 2012). The DAWN Report: Drug-related emergency department visits
  • 25. involving synthetic cannabinoids. Rockville, MD. 7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Policy impact: Prescription painkiller overdoses. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ homeandrecreationalsafety/rxbrief/ Suggested Citation Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (February 22, 2013). The DAWN Report: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits. Rockville, MD. http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/rxbrief/ http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/rxbrief/ February 22, 2013 THE DAWN REPORT: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits 8 The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) is a public health surveillance system that monitors drug-related morbidity and mortality. DAWN uses a probability sample of hospitals to produce estimates of drug- related
  • 26. emergency department (ED) visits for the United States and selected metropolitan areas annually. DAWN also produces annual profiles of drug- related deaths reviewed by medical examiners or coroners in selected metropolitan areas and States. Any ED visit related to recent drug use is included in DAWN. All types of drugs—licit and illicit—are covered. Alcohol involvement is documented for patients of all ages if it occurs with another drug. Alcohol is considered an illicit drug for minors and is documented even if no other drug is involved. The classification of drugs used in DAWN is derived from the Multum Lexicon, copyright 2012 Lexi-Comp, Inc., and/or Cerner Multum, Inc. The Multum Licensing Agreement governing use of the Lexicon can be found at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx. DAWN is one of three major surveys conducted by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (SAMHSA/CBHSQ). For more information on other CBHSQ surveys, go to http://www.samhsa.gov/data/. SAMHSA has contracts with Westat (Rockville, MD) and RTI International (Research Triangle Park, NC) to operate the DAWN system and produce publications.
  • 27. For publications and additional information about DAWN, go to http://www. samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality www.samhsa.gov/data http://www.samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx http://www.samhsa.gov/data/ http://www.samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx http://www.samhsa.gov/data/DAWN.aspx http://www.samhsa.gov/data New Assignment - PSY355 Part 1: Briefly summarize the reading of the Dawn Report including the major topics of the reading and your opinions regarding the information contained in the material (400 words or more). Part 2: Answer this question. (300 words or more). What does the data from the latest Dawn Report tell you? Anything in particular stand out