4. ASSURANCE
An engagement in which a practitioner
obtains sufficient appropriate evidence in
order to express a conclusion designed to
enhance the degree of confidence of the
intended users other than the responsible
party about the outcome of the
evaluation or measurement of a subject
matter against criteria
5. ASSURANCE
An engagement in which a practitioner
obtains sufficient appropriate evidence in
order to express a conclusion designed to
enhance the degree of confidence of the
intended users other than the responsible
party about the outcome of the
evaluation or measurement of a subject
matter against criteria
6. ASSURANCE
An engagement in which a practitioner
obtains sufficient appropriate evidence
in order to express a conclusion designed
to enhance the degree of confidence of
the intended users other than the
responsible party about the outcome of
the evaluation or measurement of a
subject matter against criteria
7. ASSURANCE
An engagement in which a practitioner
obtains sufficient appropriate evidence
in order to express a conclusion
designed to enhance the degree of
confidence of the intended users other
than the responsible party about the
outcome of the evaluation or
measurement of a subject matter against
criteria
8. ASSURANCE
An engagement in which a practitioner
obtains sufficient appropriate evidence
in order to express a conclusion
designed to enhance the degree of
confidence of the intended users other
than the responsible party about the
outcome of the evaluation or
measurement of a subject matter against
criteria
9. ASSURANCE
An engagement in which a practitioner
obtains sufficient appropriate evidence
in order to express a conclusion
designed to enhance the degree of
confidence of the intended users other
than the responsible party about the
outcome of the evaluation or
measurement of a subject matter against
criteria
10. ASSURANCE
An engagement in which a practitioner
obtains sufficient appropriate evidence
in order to express a conclusion
designed to enhance the degree of
confidence of the intended users other
than the responsible party about the
outcome of the evaluation or
measurement of a subject matter against
criteria
11. ASSURANCE
An engagement in which a practitioner
obtains sufficient appropriate evidence
in order to express a conclusion
designed to enhance the degree of
confidence of the intended users other
than the responsible party about the
outcome of the evaluation or
measurement of a subject matter against
criteria
12. ELEMENTS OF ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENT
Three Party Involvement
Appropriate Subject Matter
Suitable Criteria
Sufficient Appropriate Evidence
Written Assurance Report in an
Appropriate Form
14. REASONABLE ASSURANCE
Gathers sufficient appropriate evidence to be
able to draw reasonable conclusions
Concludes that the subject matter conforms in
all material respects with identified suitable
criteria
Gives a positively worded assurance opinion
Gives a High Level of assurance(confidence)
Performs very thorough procedures
15. EXAMPLES-REASONABLE ASSURANCE
In our opinion internal control is effective, in all
material respects, based on ABC criteria
The accounts show a true and fair view.
The cash flow forecast is correct
The appointment of the employee is fair
16. LIMITED ASSURANCE
Gathers sufficient appropriate evidence to be
able to draw limited conclusions
Concludes that the subject matter with respect to
identified suitable criteria, is plausible in the
circumstances
Gives a negatively worded assurance opinion
Gives a moderate or lower level of
assurance(confidence)
Performs significantly fewer procedures.
17. EXAMPLES-LIMITED ASSURANCE
Based on our work described in the report,
nothing has come to our attention that causes us
to believe that internal control is not effective, in
all material respects, based on ABC criteria
We have discovered nothing wrong with the
accounts
The basis of the forecast is not unreasonable
There is no evidence of discrimination in the
appointment
18. EXTERNAL AUDIT ENGAGEMENT
(REASONABLE ASSURANCE)
Purpose- To enhance the degree of confidence of
intended users in financial statements (ISA 200 Overall
Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of
Audit in accordance with ISAs)
Opinion- Financial Statements show true and fair view &
Financial statements are prepared, in all material
respects , in accordance with an applicable financial
reporting framework.
True- Factually correct information
Fair- Clear, Impartial and Unbiased information
19. OBJECTIVES OF AUDITOR
Obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error
Express an opinion on whether the financial
statements are prepared, in all material respects, in
accordance with an applicable financial reporting
framework
Report on the financial statements and communicate
as required by ISAs, in accordance with the auditor’s
findings
21. NEED FOR EXTERNAL AUDIT
Shareholders-Provide Finance and May not
be Involved in Day to Day Management
Directors-Manages company on behalf of
shareholders, must prepare financial
statements and may have various reasons
to manipulate the financial statements and
show different level of performance
Need for An Independent Review
22. BENEFITS OF EXTERNAL AUDIT
Higher quality information
Independent scrutiny and verification
Reduced Risk of management bias,
fraud and error
Enhanced credibility of FS
Deficiencies in the Internal Control
System highlighted
24. EXPECTATION GAP
A belief that auditors test all
transactions and events
A belief that auditors are required to
detect all fraud
A belief that auditor are responsible
for preparing the financial statements
25. LIMITATIONS OF AN AUDIT
Inclusion of subjective estimates and judgements
in Financial statements
Reliance on Internal Control Systems which have
their own inherent limitations
Reliance on Management Representations as only
source of evidence in some areas
Persuasive Evidence rather than Conclusive
Evidence
Sampling
26. REVIEW ENGAGEMENT
A Review Engagement
Voluntary
Analytical Procedures
Make Enquiries
Negative Assurance Report
30. KEY DEFINITIONS
Accountability
• People in position of power can be held to account for their actions
Stewardship
• Responsibility to take good care of resources
Fiduciary
relationship
• Relationship of good faith , duty of care towards someone