Library Assignment
Critique a Research Article
A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today's health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher's outcomes.
The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner:
Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA
Introduction:
· Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point.
· Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion.
Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following:
· Does the author provide a literature review?
· Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues?
· Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc.
· Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias?
· How practicaldoes this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do youbelieve they could be applied?
· Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved.
· Is the writing in the article clear straightforward?
· Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain
Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.
Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below
See Rubric Below for assignment
Title Page: Title of article, journal information and your name and date
1 point
Your score
Abstract: Brief summary of article (1-2 paragraphs)
1 points
The Problem: (2 or 3 paragraphs)
Is the problem clearly stated?
Is the problem practically important?
What is the purpose of the study?
What is the hypothesis?
Are the key terms defined?
3 points
Review of Literature: (1 -2 paragraphs)
Are the cited sources pertinent to the study?
Is the review too broad or too narrow?
Are the references recent?
Is there any evidence of bias?
2 points
Desi.
Library AssignmentCritique a Research ArticleA critique is a m.docx
1. Library Assignment
Critique a Research Article
A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized
analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the
readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on
the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to
perform a critique on a research article that deals with today's
health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what
the author are claiming, taking into account the research
methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the
researcher's outcomes.
The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title
page and references. The assignment must be strictly following
APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not
use first person throughout the paper until the section called
evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner:
Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s)
and your name. Following APA
Introduction:
· Provide an overview of the author’s research problem,
research questions and main point including how the author
supports his or her point.
· Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and
results including the process he or she used to arrive at such
conclusion.
Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the
following:
· Does the author provide a literature review?
· Is the research current and relevant to today existing health
issues?
· Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-
experimental, quasi experimental, etc.
· Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the
2. sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was
the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias?
· How practicaldoes this work seem to you? How does the
author suggest research results could be applied and how do
youbelieve they could be applied?
· Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so
provide how you think it could have improved.
· Is the writing in the article clear straightforward?
· Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain
Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of
your critique to emphasize your own main points about the
author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own
knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.
Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below
See Rubric Below for assignment
Title Page: Title of article, journal information and your name
and date
1 point
Your score
Abstract: Brief summary of article (1-2 paragraphs)
1 points
The Problem: (2 or 3 paragraphs)
Is the problem clearly stated?
Is the problem practically important?
3. What is the purpose of the study?
What is the hypothesis?
Are the key terms defined?
3 points
Review of Literature: (1 -2 paragraphs)
Are the cited sources pertinent to the study?
Is the review too broad or too narrow?
Are the references recent?
Is there any evidence of bias?
2 points
Design and Procedures: (3-4 paragraphs)
What research methodology was used?
Was it a replica study or an original study?
What measurement tools were used?
How were the procedures structures?
Was a pilot study conducted?
What are the variables?
How was sampling performed?
3 points
Data analysis and Presentation: (1 - 2 paragraphs)
2 points
How was data analyzed?
Did findings support the hypothesis and purpose?
Were weaknesses and problems discussed?
Conclusions and Implications: (2-3 paragraphs)
3 points
Are the conclusions of the study related to the original purpose?
Were the implications discussed?
Whom the results and conclusions will affect?
34. Although technologies tools are used for security and the
security expertise is within an IT department, effective security
must have the support of senior management to understand the
potential threats to an organizations information systems which
would impede the organization from achieving its goals.
As we previously discussed about threats to an AIS,
management must assess the threat to an AIS and determine how
to respond (reduce, accept, share, avoid). The second step is to
develop security policies (e.g., employees should not click on
any links embedded into e-mails) and make sure that those
policies are communicated (best way is through training).
The third step is to invest in the necessary resources (human
and technology) to reduce the security threats. Finally, active
monitoring to evaluate the security effectiveness provides a
feedback loop as management may need to make updates based
upon new threats or techniques that affect security.
Overall, management is responsible for maintaining a “culture
of security”. The fourth step requires monitoring of
performance because if you do not monitor how well you are
doing with your objectives, how do you know if it is achieved?
4
Security Approaches
Defense-in-depth
Multiple layers of control (preventive and detective) to avoid a
single point of failure
Time-based model, security is effective if:
P > D + C where
P is time it takes an attacker to break through preventive
controls
D is time it takes to detect an attack is in progress
C is time it takes to respond to the attack and take corrective
action
38. 7
Preventive: Process
Authentication—verifies the person
Something person knows
Something person has
Some biometric characteristic
Combination of all three
Authorization—determines what a person can access
8-8