SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
7/4/2012




                                                                                                                           Probability
                                                                                                                           Distribution

           Characteristics of discrete probability distribution                                                      Discrete       Continuous
        Expected value, standard deviation of a random variable
                  Binomial Probability Distributions
                            Clear Tone Radios




                                                                                                                                                 x           F(x)

                                                                                                                                                 0           0.20
        Distribution of Number of separate enquiries leading to                                                       Properties                 1
                                                                                                                                                 2
                                                                                                                                                             0.55
                                                                                                                                                             0.80
              new business proposals on any working day                                                                                          3           0.90
                                                                                                                                                 4           0.95
                                                                                                                                                 5           1.00

The probability distribution should depict/provide all possible
Information regarding the random variable in question.
                                                                                               • f(x) = P[X=x]; 0 ≤ f(x) ≤ 1; Σ f(x) =1

x              P[X=x]
                                                        Prob. dist. of no. of qualifying       • CDF F(x) = P[X ≤x] = Σy ≤ x f(y)
                                                              enquiries in a day
0               0.20                                                                           • F is a step function with jumps only at the possible
1               0.35
                                                 0.40
                                                                                                 values
                                   probability




                                                 0.30
2               0.25
3               0.10                             0.20
                                                                                               • Density to distribution function and vice versa
4               0.05                             0.10

5               0.05                             0.00
                                                           0     1       2     3       4   5
                                                                      no. of queries                                                                    32
total           1.00




               Expectation and Variance                                                                          Interpretation of
       x           f           xf                              x2f            (x-mean)2f
                                                                                                                 EXPECTED VALUE
    values       prob.


    0            0.20          0                                0                  0.512
    1            0.35         0.35                             0.35                0.126
    2            0.25         0.5                               1                  0.04
    3            0.10         0.3                              0.9                 0.196               • “mean” in the long run
    4            0.05         0.2                              0.8                 0.288
    5            0.05         0.25                             1.25                0.578
                                                                                                       • not necessarily the most likely value
    Total        1.00      mean= 1.60                          4.30             σ2=1.74

                         Check: 4.30 - 1.602= 1.74




                                                                                                                                                                     1
7/4/2012




  Probability distribution of # of successful days in a working
                  week (consisting of six days)                                       Binomial Probabilities

   A day is deemed to be successful if at least 1 qualifying enquires
   are made on that day.
                                                                          Possible number of successful days : 0,1,2,3,4,5,6

                                                                        Probability[0 successful day] = P[FFFFFF]=0.26=0.000064

   P(a day is successful) = 0.8                                         Probability[1 successful day] = P[SFFFFF]+ P[FSFFFF]+
                                                                        P[FFSFFF]+ P[FFFSFF]+ P[FFFFSF]+ P[FFFFFS]
                                                                        = 6 ×0.25 ×0.8 =0.001536




   Probability distribution of # of successful days in a                              Binomial Distribution
        working week (consisting of six days):                                        When is it applicable?
                          Binomial distribution                           • Binomial expt. is one where n independent
                                                                            and identical trials are repeated; each trial
     No of
                                                                            may result in two possible outcomes(call them
successful days Probability                                      6×5        ‘success’(S) and ‘failure’(F); p=P(S).
      0           0.000
                                              6
                                                  C 4 = 6C 2 =
      1           0.002                                          1× 2     • In the above context, a random variable X,
      2           0.015                                                     denoting the total no. of successes is said to
      3           0.082
      4           0.246             6
                                        C4 × 0.84 × 0.22                    have a Binomial distribution with parameters
      5           0.393                                                     n and p. X→B(n,p)
      6           0.262




           Binomial Distribution(cont.)                                                         Exercise
    • So, in general, for X→B(n,p)                                        Work out the market research problem for the
        – P[X=x]= nCx px (1-p)(n-x)                                        new product design given in the last week.
    •   Use Excel to calculate probabilities
    •   Mean or the ‘Expected value’ = np                                 Need to feed in P [survey result| Market will do
    •   Variance = np(1-p)                                                 well] & P [survey result| Market will NOT do
                                                                           well]
    •   standard deviation = √{np(1-p)}



                                                                                                                                40




                                                                                                                                           2
7/4/2012




                Redo Problem (using tables)



   •Let X denote the no. of transmissions with flaws(F).

   •X→B(10,.02)



(a) want P[X>2] =         0.0008
    (from AS: Appendix C)

(a) P[X= 0]        =     0.8171
                                                           43




                                                                      3

More Related Content

What's hot

Frank_NeuroInformatics11.pdf
Frank_NeuroInformatics11.pdfFrank_NeuroInformatics11.pdf
Frank_NeuroInformatics11.pdffrankmj
 
Singapore conference
Singapore conferenceSingapore conference
Singapore conferencekmatthcera
 
Boyles Law Sim Sc08
Boyles Law Sim Sc08Boyles Law Sim Sc08
Boyles Law Sim Sc08Tom Loughran
 
Gm533 Week 5 Lecture March 2012
Gm533 Week 5 Lecture March 2012Gm533 Week 5 Lecture March 2012
Gm533 Week 5 Lecture March 2012Brent Heard
 
R graphics260809
R graphics260809R graphics260809
R graphics260809lizbethfdz
 
A Comparison of Evaluation Methods in Coevolution 20070921
A Comparison of Evaluation Methods in Coevolution 20070921A Comparison of Evaluation Methods in Coevolution 20070921
A Comparison of Evaluation Methods in Coevolution 20070921Ting-Shuo Yo
 
Mississauga Lasik CE 2008 by Dr. Jeff Machat
Mississauga Lasik CE 2008 by Dr. Jeff MachatMississauga Lasik CE 2008 by Dr. Jeff Machat
Mississauga Lasik CE 2008 by Dr. Jeff MachatMachat LASIK
 
Sustainable Questions
Sustainable QuestionsSustainable Questions
Sustainable QuestionsBart de Goede
 

What's hot (9)

Frank_NeuroInformatics11.pdf
Frank_NeuroInformatics11.pdfFrank_NeuroInformatics11.pdf
Frank_NeuroInformatics11.pdf
 
Singapore conference
Singapore conferenceSingapore conference
Singapore conference
 
Boyles Law Sim Sc08
Boyles Law Sim Sc08Boyles Law Sim Sc08
Boyles Law Sim Sc08
 
Gm533 Week 5 Lecture March 2012
Gm533 Week 5 Lecture March 2012Gm533 Week 5 Lecture March 2012
Gm533 Week 5 Lecture March 2012
 
R graphics260809
R graphics260809R graphics260809
R graphics260809
 
A Comparison of Evaluation Methods in Coevolution 20070921
A Comparison of Evaluation Methods in Coevolution 20070921A Comparison of Evaluation Methods in Coevolution 20070921
A Comparison of Evaluation Methods in Coevolution 20070921
 
Mississauga Lasik CE 2008 by Dr. Jeff Machat
Mississauga Lasik CE 2008 by Dr. Jeff MachatMississauga Lasik CE 2008 by Dr. Jeff Machat
Mississauga Lasik CE 2008 by Dr. Jeff Machat
 
Sustainable Questions
Sustainable QuestionsSustainable Questions
Sustainable Questions
 
Modeling & Simulation
Modeling & SimulationModeling & Simulation
Modeling & Simulation
 

Viewers also liked

Internship in-chennai-for-cse-in-bigdata
Internship in-chennai-for-cse-in-bigdataInternship in-chennai-for-cse-in-bigdata
Internship in-chennai-for-cse-in-bigdatadaulatbegam
 
Stochastic models
Stochastic modelsStochastic models
Stochastic modelsPT Lion Air
 
Topic 6 stat probability theory
Topic 6 stat probability theoryTopic 6 stat probability theory
Topic 6 stat probability theorySizwan Ahammed
 
Mpc 006 - 01-04 level of significance
Mpc 006 - 01-04 level of significanceMpc 006 - 01-04 level of significance
Mpc 006 - 01-04 level of significanceVasant Kothari
 
Stat lesson 5.1 probability distributions
Stat lesson 5.1 probability distributionsStat lesson 5.1 probability distributions
Stat lesson 5.1 probability distributionspipamutuc
 
Probability Distributions for Discrete Variables
Probability Distributions for Discrete VariablesProbability Distributions for Discrete Variables
Probability Distributions for Discrete Variablesgetyourcheaton
 
Chap05 discrete probability distributions
Chap05 discrete probability distributionsChap05 discrete probability distributions
Chap05 discrete probability distributionsUni Azza Aunillah
 
Test of significance
Test of significanceTest of significance
Test of significancemigom doley
 
Probability distribution 2
Probability distribution 2Probability distribution 2
Probability distribution 2Nilanjan Bhaumik
 
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and IndependenceThe Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independencejasondroesch
 
Markov Models
Markov ModelsMarkov Models
Markov ModelsVu Pham
 
Goodness of fit statistics poisson regression
Goodness of fit statistics poisson regressionGoodness of fit statistics poisson regression
Goodness of fit statistics poisson regressionUniversity of Southampton
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Internship in-chennai-for-cse-in-bigdata
Internship in-chennai-for-cse-in-bigdataInternship in-chennai-for-cse-in-bigdata
Internship in-chennai-for-cse-in-bigdata
 
Session 2
Session 2Session 2
Session 2
 
Stochastic models
Stochastic modelsStochastic models
Stochastic models
 
Topic 6 stat probability theory
Topic 6 stat probability theoryTopic 6 stat probability theory
Topic 6 stat probability theory
 
Markov Random Field (MRF)
Markov Random Field (MRF)Markov Random Field (MRF)
Markov Random Field (MRF)
 
The chi square_test
The chi square_testThe chi square_test
The chi square_test
 
Mpc 006 - 01-04 level of significance
Mpc 006 - 01-04 level of significanceMpc 006 - 01-04 level of significance
Mpc 006 - 01-04 level of significance
 
Markov models explained
Markov models explainedMarkov models explained
Markov models explained
 
Stat lesson 5.1 probability distributions
Stat lesson 5.1 probability distributionsStat lesson 5.1 probability distributions
Stat lesson 5.1 probability distributions
 
Probability Distributions for Discrete Variables
Probability Distributions for Discrete VariablesProbability Distributions for Discrete Variables
Probability Distributions for Discrete Variables
 
B.9 chi square
B.9 chi squareB.9 chi square
B.9 chi square
 
Conditional Probability
Conditional ProbabilityConditional Probability
Conditional Probability
 
Chap05 discrete probability distributions
Chap05 discrete probability distributionsChap05 discrete probability distributions
Chap05 discrete probability distributions
 
Test of significance
Test of significanceTest of significance
Test of significance
 
Probability distribution 2
Probability distribution 2Probability distribution 2
Probability distribution 2
 
Chapter 06
Chapter 06 Chapter 06
Chapter 06
 
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and IndependenceThe Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
 
Growth and inequality in bangladesh
Growth and inequality in bangladeshGrowth and inequality in bangladesh
Growth and inequality in bangladesh
 
Markov Models
Markov ModelsMarkov Models
Markov Models
 
Goodness of fit statistics poisson regression
Goodness of fit statistics poisson regressionGoodness of fit statistics poisson regression
Goodness of fit statistics poisson regression
 

Similar to Session 5

Model-based analysis using generative embedding
Model-based analysis using generative embeddingModel-based analysis using generative embedding
Model-based analysis using generative embeddingkhbrodersen
 
White.p.johnson.k
White.p.johnson.kWhite.p.johnson.k
White.p.johnson.kNASAPMC
 
Connectome Classification: Statistical Connectomics for Analysis of Connectom...
Connectome Classification: Statistical Connectomics for Analysis of Connectom...Connectome Classification: Statistical Connectomics for Analysis of Connectom...
Connectome Classification: Statistical Connectomics for Analysis of Connectom...Joshua Vogelstein
 
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdfST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdfgrssieee
 
Quantitative methods schedule
Quantitative methods scheduleQuantitative methods schedule
Quantitative methods scheduleJohn Goodpasture
 
Discrete Probability Distributions
Discrete  Probability DistributionsDiscrete  Probability Distributions
Discrete Probability DistributionsE-tan
 
Bayesian Inference on a Stochastic Volatility model Using PMCMC methods
Bayesian Inference on a Stochastic Volatility model Using PMCMC methodsBayesian Inference on a Stochastic Volatility model Using PMCMC methods
Bayesian Inference on a Stochastic Volatility model Using PMCMC methodspaperbags
 
Why we don’t know how many colors there are
Why we don’t know how many colors there areWhy we don’t know how many colors there are
Why we don’t know how many colors there areJan Morovic
 

Similar to Session 5 (8)

Model-based analysis using generative embedding
Model-based analysis using generative embeddingModel-based analysis using generative embedding
Model-based analysis using generative embedding
 
White.p.johnson.k
White.p.johnson.kWhite.p.johnson.k
White.p.johnson.k
 
Connectome Classification: Statistical Connectomics for Analysis of Connectom...
Connectome Classification: Statistical Connectomics for Analysis of Connectom...Connectome Classification: Statistical Connectomics for Analysis of Connectom...
Connectome Classification: Statistical Connectomics for Analysis of Connectom...
 
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdfST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
ST.Monteiro-EmbeddedFeatureSelection.pdf
 
Quantitative methods schedule
Quantitative methods scheduleQuantitative methods schedule
Quantitative methods schedule
 
Discrete Probability Distributions
Discrete  Probability DistributionsDiscrete  Probability Distributions
Discrete Probability Distributions
 
Bayesian Inference on a Stochastic Volatility model Using PMCMC methods
Bayesian Inference on a Stochastic Volatility model Using PMCMC methodsBayesian Inference on a Stochastic Volatility model Using PMCMC methods
Bayesian Inference on a Stochastic Volatility model Using PMCMC methods
 
Why we don’t know how many colors there are
Why we don’t know how many colors there areWhy we don’t know how many colors there are
Why we don’t know how many colors there are
 

More from vivek_shaw

Lecture 11 market structure- perfect competition
Lecture 11  market structure- perfect competitionLecture 11  market structure- perfect competition
Lecture 11 market structure- perfect competitionvivek_shaw
 
Lecture 9 costs
Lecture 9  costsLecture 9  costs
Lecture 9 costsvivek_shaw
 
Lecture 8 production, optimal inputs
Lecture 8  production, optimal inputsLecture 8  production, optimal inputs
Lecture 8 production, optimal inputsvivek_shaw
 
Lecture 8 production, optimal inputs (1)
Lecture 8  production, optimal inputs (1)Lecture 8  production, optimal inputs (1)
Lecture 8 production, optimal inputs (1)vivek_shaw
 
Lecture 3 dds sand elasticity
Lecture 3  dds sand elasticityLecture 3  dds sand elasticity
Lecture 3 dds sand elasticityvivek_shaw
 
Consumertheory1
Consumertheory1Consumertheory1
Consumertheory1vivek_shaw
 
Consumer theory 2
Consumer theory 2Consumer theory 2
Consumer theory 2vivek_shaw
 
Class2 market, demand and supply
Class2  market, demand and supplyClass2  market, demand and supply
Class2 market, demand and supplyvivek_shaw
 
Policy implications
Policy implicationsPolicy implications
Policy implicationsvivek_shaw
 
Man org session 3-org and technology_5th july 2012
Man org session 3-org and technology_5th july 2012Man org session 3-org and technology_5th july 2012
Man org session 3-org and technology_5th july 2012vivek_shaw
 
Man org session 14_org decision making_16th august 2012
Man org session 14_org decision making_16th august 2012Man org session 14_org decision making_16th august 2012
Man org session 14_org decision making_16th august 2012vivek_shaw
 
Man org session 12_org learning_3rd august 2012
Man org session 12_org learning_3rd august 2012Man org session 12_org learning_3rd august 2012
Man org session 12_org learning_3rd august 2012vivek_shaw
 
Man org session 11 interorganizational relationships_2nd august 2012
Man org session 11 interorganizational relationships_2nd august 2012Man org session 11 interorganizational relationships_2nd august 2012
Man org session 11 interorganizational relationships_2nd august 2012vivek_shaw
 
Man org session 10_org control_27th july 2012
Man org session 10_org control_27th july 2012Man org session 10_org control_27th july 2012
Man org session 10_org control_27th july 2012vivek_shaw
 

More from vivek_shaw (20)

Lecture 11 market structure- perfect competition
Lecture 11  market structure- perfect competitionLecture 11  market structure- perfect competition
Lecture 11 market structure- perfect competition
 
Lecture 9 costs
Lecture 9  costsLecture 9  costs
Lecture 9 costs
 
Lecture 8 production, optimal inputs
Lecture 8  production, optimal inputsLecture 8  production, optimal inputs
Lecture 8 production, optimal inputs
 
Lecture 8 production, optimal inputs (1)
Lecture 8  production, optimal inputs (1)Lecture 8  production, optimal inputs (1)
Lecture 8 production, optimal inputs (1)
 
Lecture 3 dds sand elasticity
Lecture 3  dds sand elasticityLecture 3  dds sand elasticity
Lecture 3 dds sand elasticity
 
Game theory 3
Game theory 3Game theory 3
Game theory 3
 
Game theory 1
Game theory 1Game theory 1
Game theory 1
 
Game theory 2
Game theory 2Game theory 2
Game theory 2
 
Ford motors
Ford motorsFord motors
Ford motors
 
Consumertheory1
Consumertheory1Consumertheory1
Consumertheory1
 
Consumer theory 2
Consumer theory 2Consumer theory 2
Consumer theory 2
 
Class2 market, demand and supply
Class2  market, demand and supplyClass2  market, demand and supply
Class2 market, demand and supply
 
Auctions 1
Auctions 1Auctions 1
Auctions 1
 
Costs2
Costs2Costs2
Costs2
 
Policy implications
Policy implicationsPolicy implications
Policy implications
 
Man org session 3-org and technology_5th july 2012
Man org session 3-org and technology_5th july 2012Man org session 3-org and technology_5th july 2012
Man org session 3-org and technology_5th july 2012
 
Man org session 14_org decision making_16th august 2012
Man org session 14_org decision making_16th august 2012Man org session 14_org decision making_16th august 2012
Man org session 14_org decision making_16th august 2012
 
Man org session 12_org learning_3rd august 2012
Man org session 12_org learning_3rd august 2012Man org session 12_org learning_3rd august 2012
Man org session 12_org learning_3rd august 2012
 
Man org session 11 interorganizational relationships_2nd august 2012
Man org session 11 interorganizational relationships_2nd august 2012Man org session 11 interorganizational relationships_2nd august 2012
Man org session 11 interorganizational relationships_2nd august 2012
 
Man org session 10_org control_27th july 2012
Man org session 10_org control_27th july 2012Man org session 10_org control_27th july 2012
Man org session 10_org control_27th july 2012
 

Session 5

  • 1. 7/4/2012 Probability Distribution Characteristics of discrete probability distribution Discrete Continuous Expected value, standard deviation of a random variable Binomial Probability Distributions Clear Tone Radios x F(x) 0 0.20 Distribution of Number of separate enquiries leading to Properties 1 2 0.55 0.80 new business proposals on any working day 3 0.90 4 0.95 5 1.00 The probability distribution should depict/provide all possible Information regarding the random variable in question. • f(x) = P[X=x]; 0 ≤ f(x) ≤ 1; Σ f(x) =1 x P[X=x] Prob. dist. of no. of qualifying • CDF F(x) = P[X ≤x] = Σy ≤ x f(y) enquiries in a day 0 0.20 • F is a step function with jumps only at the possible 1 0.35 0.40 values probability 0.30 2 0.25 3 0.10 0.20 • Density to distribution function and vice versa 4 0.05 0.10 5 0.05 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 no. of queries 32 total 1.00 Expectation and Variance Interpretation of x f xf x2f (x-mean)2f EXPECTED VALUE values prob. 0 0.20 0 0 0.512 1 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.126 2 0.25 0.5 1 0.04 3 0.10 0.3 0.9 0.196 • “mean” in the long run 4 0.05 0.2 0.8 0.288 5 0.05 0.25 1.25 0.578 • not necessarily the most likely value Total 1.00 mean= 1.60 4.30 σ2=1.74 Check: 4.30 - 1.602= 1.74 1
  • 2. 7/4/2012 Probability distribution of # of successful days in a working week (consisting of six days) Binomial Probabilities A day is deemed to be successful if at least 1 qualifying enquires are made on that day. Possible number of successful days : 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 Probability[0 successful day] = P[FFFFFF]=0.26=0.000064 P(a day is successful) = 0.8 Probability[1 successful day] = P[SFFFFF]+ P[FSFFFF]+ P[FFSFFF]+ P[FFFSFF]+ P[FFFFSF]+ P[FFFFFS] = 6 ×0.25 ×0.8 =0.001536 Probability distribution of # of successful days in a Binomial Distribution working week (consisting of six days): When is it applicable? Binomial distribution • Binomial expt. is one where n independent and identical trials are repeated; each trial No of may result in two possible outcomes(call them successful days Probability 6×5 ‘success’(S) and ‘failure’(F); p=P(S). 0 0.000 6 C 4 = 6C 2 = 1 0.002 1× 2 • In the above context, a random variable X, 2 0.015 denoting the total no. of successes is said to 3 0.082 4 0.246 6 C4 × 0.84 × 0.22 have a Binomial distribution with parameters 5 0.393 n and p. X→B(n,p) 6 0.262 Binomial Distribution(cont.) Exercise • So, in general, for X→B(n,p) Work out the market research problem for the – P[X=x]= nCx px (1-p)(n-x) new product design given in the last week. • Use Excel to calculate probabilities • Mean or the ‘Expected value’ = np Need to feed in P [survey result| Market will do • Variance = np(1-p) well] & P [survey result| Market will NOT do well] • standard deviation = √{np(1-p)} 40 2
  • 3. 7/4/2012 Redo Problem (using tables) •Let X denote the no. of transmissions with flaws(F). •X→B(10,.02) (a) want P[X>2] = 0.0008 (from AS: Appendix C) (a) P[X= 0] = 0.8171 43 3