King Malici Chapter Summaries

King Malici Chapter Summaries
 NARRATOR: Once upon a time, there was a King Malicious who had a beautiful daughter. Men
from all around the world sent proposals of marriage to King Malicious, but King Malicious said.
KING MALICIOUS: Whoever would marry my daughter must perform three impossible tasks.
First, they must swim across The Kings River alone through shark infested waters. Second, they
must bring me a vial of cool water from the Lake of the Abominable Snow Man, water so cool it
chills you to the bone. And third, they must bring me a scale from the hide of the great dragon
Alduin.
NARRATOR: King Malicious knew these tasks to be impossible, hence the name, three impossible
tasks. But King Malicious, who did want grandchildren one day, assured each man that undertook ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All were eaten by sharks. Some men chose to start in the middle and visit the Lake of the
Abominable Snow Man. All of them were eaten. And a few brave souls attempted to visit the mighty
dragon Alduin. They, too, were eaten. Until one day...
Trumpets winded within. Prince Cunning enters with his Servant.
PRINCE CUNNING: Hail, mighty King Malicious! I have come to claim my bride!
KING MALICIOUS: Welcome, young Prince. I hate to tell you this, but any man who wants to win
my daughter has got to perform three impossible tasks.
PRINCE CUNNING: But I have, o Great King Malicious! I have performed each task as it is
written, and have come to claim my prize.
KING MALICIOUS: Really? Can you prove this?
PRINCE CUNNING: Happy to, your majesty. First, I journeyed to The King Malicious River, a
treacherous body infested with sharks. I jumped in at Merlin's Bluff, and swam across to the Beach
of Arthur.
KING MALICIOUS: The Beach of Arthur?
PRINCE CUNNING: Yes, your majesty.

KING MALICIOUS: That doesn't count.
PRINCE CUNNING: Why not? Is not the passage from Merlin's Bluff to the Beach of Arthur part of
The King Malicious River?
KING MALICIOUS: Yeah, but there's no sharks
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Why Did God Kill His Own Prophet?
Why did God kill his Own Prophet? In this essay. I will argue that God put his prophet to death
because the prophet disobeyed God's direct command. The three points that will support this thesis
are the following: The man of God who is a public figure states that God commanded him not to eat
or drink, to which he still disobeys willingly. If the prophet was not put to death, then there will have
been an excuse that sin is a light matter and does not deserve punishment. The death of the Man of
God was a final warning to the people of Israel and the king who all have no longer an excuse not to
turn from their wicked ways.
The man of God who is a public figure states that God commanded him not to eat or drink, to which
he still disobeys willingly. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The man of God has returned to Bethel to replenish his strength at the old prophet's house, and this
is where God tells the man of God that he has disobeyed him (1 Kings 13:19–22). The man of God
is a public figure in a pre–idolatry country, he publicly (1 Kings 12:33) gives the word of the Lord to
the people and the king (1 Kings 13:2–3). The entire city know that the man of God prophesied
doom on the alter and the people if they did not turn from their wicked ways. No more than a few
hours later two men come back to the city and told everyone that the man of God had been killed by
a lion, but was not eaten "And when he was gone, a lion met him by the way, and slew him: and his
carcase was cast in the way, and the ass stood by it, the lion also stood by the carcase. And, behold,
men passed by, and saw the carcase cast in the way, and the lion standing by the carcase: and they
came and told it in the city where the old prophet dwelt." (1 Kings 13:24–25 KJV). The man of God
return the place were God commanded him not to refresh himself, everyone knows that God
commanded him not to come back yet here he was, and a few hours later they hear that he is dead. If
the man of God did not needlessly say what God commanded him out in public his direct
disobedience to the word of God would have been dealt with privately. Unfortunate for him,
everyone knows what God commanded which gave way for anyone to consider sin is light deed. If
the prophet had not been put to death, then the word of God would had seemed unnecessary to
follow which than can lead to state that sin is a light matter, and does not need

The Handmaid's Tale: A Summary
Once upon a time there was a king. He had no sons, but one daughter. One day she became sick, and
the king inspected her food for traces of poison by having taste testers eat the food to see if they got
sick. When they had come down with sickness the king analyzed the food with one of his scientists
new inventions, the Sample Tracer, a machine that can detect traces of foreign material from
whatever it scans. It took samples of the uncooked food and the food given to the princess and
detected traces of an unknown substance in the princesses food. The king was told that his daughter
could be healed by eating an apple. After the king heard this he announced that whoever brings his
daughter the apples that would bring her health back could marry ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Hans would hide under the bed and the wife would talk to the griffin about the key, the girl, and the
tall man and when the griffin was asleep he would get one of his feathers. Then when the griffin
leaves the next morning Hans can head back to the castle. When the griffin got home the wife had
told him about all of the problems she was told about by a visitor and the griffin answered them all.
When he had fallen asleep Hans plucked one of his feathers and waited until morning to leave. On
his way back the tall man asked him if he found out anything and Hans said he would tell him after
he had carried him across. Hans then told the man that the next person to show up at the lake you
have to put them in the middle of it and you won't have to carry anyone across again. On the back to
the castle Hans fixed all of the problems he was asked to fix and was rewarded many things. When
he arrived at the castle he brought the feather and all of the rewards he received to the king. Hans
told the king that the griffin gave everyone whatever they wanted. The king then set out to meet the
griffin, but when he arrived at the lake he happened to be the first person there since Hans left. So
the tall man put him in the middle of the lake and drowned. Then Hans married the princess and
became the new king. Eventually the king's crown and robe were found in the lake by some guards,
so they investigated and found his

Effect Of The Witches In Macbeth
How do the witches affect the actions of Macbeth?
Macduff enters Holding Macbeth's Lifeless head. "Hail King of Scotland!", Cheer the people. How
did it get to this? How did a soft–hearted and honest noble like Macbeth get into this position? The
quick and easy answer is that it was the work of the three witches.
At the beginning of the play, the three witches gave Macbeth and Banquo prophecies; Macbeth will
be king, thane of Cawdor, and be thane of Glamis. They also said that Banquo's sons will be kings.
At first, Macbeth didn't think much about what the witches said until the first prophecy came true;
Macbeth was awarded Thane of Cawdor. After that Macbeth was sure that the witches were telling
the truth. He knew that he would one day ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the apparitions told Macbeth to be bold, violent and laugh at men because no man born from
women would kill Macbeth. "Be bloody, bold, and resolute. Laugh to scorn the power of man, for
none of woman born shall harm Macbeth"(4.1.81–83). Another one told Macbeth that he wouldn't
be defeated until Birnam Wood comes to fight him at Dunsinane Hill Be lion–mettled, proud, and
take no care Who chafes, who frets, or where conspirers are. Macbeth shall never vanquish be until
Great Birnam Wood to high Dunsinane Hill Shall come against him.
All these predictions made Macbeth very confident in himself. No man born from a woman would
kill him and for the woods of Great Birnam To come to Dunsinane Hill was almost impossible, Or
so he thought.He was motivated to be violent and bold in his actions. He killed Macduff's wife and
children and stayed to fight Macduff when Edward's army marched to Dunsinane Hill with branches
of Great Birnam. Since no man born of a woman could ever harm him, Macbeth thought that he
would be able to defeat Macduff. For example, when he killed Young Siward Macbeth didn't even
feel accomplished because he believed that he would never lose a battle to a man and that he
wouldn't be defeated until Birnam Wood moves to Dunsinane Hill. "Thou wast born of woman. But
swords I Smile at, weapons laugh to scorn, Brandished by man that's of a woman born."(5.7.13–15)

Comparing Shahrazad's One Thousand And One Arabian Nights
Life–Saving Stories There are many inspirational stories, but Shahrazad's tales are similar to no
other. One Thousand and One Arabian Nights, originally an epic poem that is now a collection of
stories, was written in the 7th century A.D. and has been influenced from Islamic countries and
regions in the Middle East and Africa. In One Thousand and One Arabian Nights, King Shahryar is
the ruler of Sasan and is considered to rule wisely and gently until his beloved wife cheats on him
with the stable servant. Because of his wife's actions, King Shahryar marries a new woman every
day and executes her the next morning. Shahrazad, the daughter of the King's wazir, volunteers to
marry the cruel Shahryar. But, she has the rare gift of storytelling that she uses every night to not
only save her life, but the lives of Sasan's women by transforming King Shahryar into a ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this allegory, the animals are being tortured by Man–kin who is considered a treacherous,
monstrous creature who is a human in reality. The lion and goose decide to get revenge on Man–kin,
but neither creature had seen their enemy before. Therefore, they were not aware of his appearance.
The sly Man–kin pretends to be a carpenter of the village, and to make the lion jealous, he claims to
be building a cabin for the lion's cousin to jump out of and kill the wicked Man–kin. The envious,
prideful lion wants to be the first creature to kill Man–kin, and demands that the "carpenter" builds
him a cabin first. But, Man–kin uses the cabin the builds as a cage to burn the sheltered lion in,
which brings the lion to his death. Shahrazad's intention is to make King Shahryar realize how cruel
he is in the form of Man–kin. Shahryar is extremely shocked with Man–kin's cruelty as he

The Happy Man's Shirt '
In the Italian tale "The Happy Man's Shirt" the theme happens to be happiness is the perspective of
life instead of the need of material objects. The king had a son whom was put high up on a
pedestal.Even though the prince had the world he was not happy, "But this prince was always
unhappy. He would spend days on end at his window staring into space"("The Happy Man's Shirt").
The prince has the whole entire kingdom and a dad whom would do anything he pleased. The prince
still was not happy because of how he sees his life as unfilled and he does not have to work for
anything as it is handed to him. When material objects get handed to the prince without any work
needed it puts a bad taste in everyone's mouth. Also, the prince seems depressed as all ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The king looked far and wide for a man whom fit the description to exchange his shirt for the
prince's. After looking in his kingdom, the king was told of a neighboring king whom was happy in
every definition of the word, "Yes, indeed, I have everything anybody could possibly want. But at
the same time I worry because I'll have to die one day and leave it all. I can't sleep at night for
worrying about that!" ("The Happy Man's Shirt") While the neighboring king had material objects
and was at the height of his reign. Truly, he was not completely at peace with how his life would
potentially turn out. As other men look upon the king they see nothing but sheer happiness seeing as
the king has everything they could ever want in their lives.The neighboring king is much like the
prince seeing as they are both on top of the world and have a fantastic way of life but are still not
satisfied. The neighboring king is too worried about losing his lovely life then to live in the moment
and enjoy his life. As the king is trying all of his backup plans, he finds a man while hunting whom
is happy with his life. The king is ecstatic this young man could save his son's life ,"The king
grabbed him and started unbuttoning the youth's

The Lady Or The Tiger Essay
If you loved someone would you rather have them dead or marry someone else? In The Lady or The
tiger by Frank R. Stockton there is a princess who is in love with a commoner. Her father, the king,
found out and put him into jail. He was sent to trial where if he opened one door he'd be married to a
stranger or the other would unleash a hungry tiger to kill him. The princess knew which door had
which outcome and led him towards one. One perspective is that the princess led the man to the
door with the tiger. Another perspective is that she led him to the door with his new wife. While
arguments can be made that she led him to the lady, it is more conceivable that she led him to the
tiger. It can be argued that the princess led the man to the

Macbeth Tragic Hero Research Paper
Macbeth: The story of A Tragic Hero
Is Macbeth good,bad, evil or nice or just straight up disturbed? The story of Macbeth, written by
William Shakespeare, is about a rising king who had to do daring deeds in order to become king.
One man, with one desire to become king of his home in Dunsinane, becomes a most tragic
character, and even hero.
Macbeth is a self–made man, and he is noble and honorable. He is a warrior, a Thane, and is
respected. However this is not what makes a man a hero. A hero is a person who puts others needs
before him or herself. On the other hand, a tragic hero is a person who desires what he or she wants,
not what is best for others. For Macbeth, it was easy fighting for the king, commanding his friends
and beloved ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Macbeth was told by witches that one day he will become Thane of Cawdor and eventually become
king, along with his friend Banquo who would father kings. Macbeth becomes more jealous about
not being noble enough to be king, and thus begins his dark days. King Duncan falls victim to
murder and his son's become suspects to the murder and leave the city. Macbeth is the murderer, but
feels guilt for it. Macbeth feels sorrow and feels lost after killing Duncan and he says "Will all great
Neptune's ocean wash this blood clean from hand?" (59). This quote represents how bad Macbeth
feels after killing his dear friend and colleague. Macbeth starts down a dark road and his wife is his
accomplice. Although Macbeth's wife tells him " My hands are of your color, but I shame to wear a
heart so white" (59). Macbeth's wife is telling Macbeth that he must keep his own composure and
learn to keep his own feelings in mind as so not to tell anybody about what happened. The
importance of this evidence is that Macbeth had a chance to turn himself in but his wife pushes him
down the dark road and he follows. As for Macbeth, himself feels as if he has reached rock bottom
and decides that in order to keep himself king that there would be more killing. But for Macbeth it is
just the beginning of his

Analysis Of Plato 's ' The Democratic Man '
Brandon Wilson
Professor Evans
Intro to Philosophy
4 March 2015
Plato's Democratic Man Plato describes the degeneration to democracy in Book VIII of The
Republic as the relationship between man and the city. There are five stages starting with the first
being and aristocracy led by a philosopher king who is wise and makes the decision for all and his
soul is considered to be that of gold. Aristocracy stage leads to timocracy which would is the new
generation of leaders and their souls are not considered to be made of gold as the philosopher king
would be in the previous stage leading to a stronger lust for wealth. Timocracy then goes to
oligarchy which leads to wealth and poverty, while the wealthy write laws to help them continue to
be wealthy. Oligarchy then degrades to the democracy stage where wealth and freedom, a lavish of
riches so to speak is desired in this stage. Democracy degenerates into tyranny where the people
give into their desires and is considered to be chaos.
Plato thinks that the philosopher king aristocracy would be the best type of government, one needs
to ask would this type of government control man's appetite for wealth and luxuries? The kings
would not themselves accrue wealth according to the republic, so where would it go, to the army, or
to public education, or maybe back to the people to build better means to take care of themselves?
These ideas he has are irrelevant because all the stages intertwine together in some form. They do
not stray

Sterling Silverson Narrative
MORAL: Don't do things that go against your morals Sterling Silverson stepped through the cold,
wet, sticky mud and knocked on the door of the huge stone brick gate that separated King Sparrow's
castle from the rest of the kingdom. He waited there for a couple minutes until he could hear hushed
arguing past the main gate. First, there was a loud sigh– closely followed by a short, trembling
pointy nosed man. He wore a beautiful black cloak with bits of chain mail covering the sleeves and
legs for added protection. "H–hello? W–who are you?" stammered the man at the gate. "I am
Sterling Silverson. Son of Bartimaeus Silverson. I have completed all the knight training tasks and I
am ready. I wish to speak to the king." answered Silverson. The man at the gate grumbled to himself
and opened it. Silverson walked in and was let in the castle. He was about to go up to the throne
room when he was abruptly stopped by the man who let him in. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I'd be happy to get y–your armor and sword for you. N–now, just wait here and m–maybe talk to to
the other Knights." nervously stammered the man. Silverson nodded and waited. Another man, this
time in knight armor, walked up to him. "So, you're the new guy. I heard your father was a knight
too." the knight said, trying to spark up conversation. "Yes." answered Silverson. "Your father died
in the great dragon war because of a rookie mistake. Don't make that same mistake." commanded
the knight. "Who are you?" inquired Silverson. "You can just call me Craven. I've been a knight for
a few years now." answered the

Macbeth Tragic Hero Research Paper
Early literature had many stories of great heroes. Among those stories, is the story of a tragic hero.
Tragic heroes are great figures who have to deal with many obstacles that eventually lead to a
downfall. They acquire many qualities and have much nobility above other men of the time. Tragic
heroes usually have a goal or a dream in the future that they try to pursue to get what they want.
Their own actions cause their fate and lead to their downfall. These types of tragedies not only lead
to the downfall of the hero but also normally their death. The deaths seem to be extremely brutal,
but things could always be worse. Macbeth is a story of a noble man who certainly falls into the
standards of being a tragic hero. Macbeth fits that of a tragic hero, because he was a major figure in
a battle, a foretold future leads to his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before he ran into the witches he was a good man, he was respected and was loyal to his king.
Without the foretold future from the witches Lady Macbeth would not have pushed Mabeth to kill
King Duncan, the thoughts would not of even entered their mind. Lady Macbeth was a huge
influence to Macbeth, she pushed him to do things that he normally would not do. She was by far
the main reason to why he became the man he was after the appearance of the witches. If it wasn't
for Lady Macbeth the story of Macbeth would not be. You can see that in Macbeth's mind at times
that he was afraid of what is to come. Macbeth saw the ghost of Banquo at the feast and he is scared
by what he sees, "thou canst not say I did it. Never shake thy gory locks at me" (55). He only sees,
and thinks these thoughts because he feels remorse for what he has done. He didn't know what to do
but then his wife kept in his ear and fueled his hubris. The story shows that he was once a honorable
man, but you could feel pity for the man that he could have been, and not for the man that he

The Man Who Would Be King And Things Fall Apart Essay
In Kipling's "The Man Who Would Be King" and in Achebe's Things Fall Apart two different
cultures of people view gods equally important. Both groups know that the gods will determine their
success, however in the characters of "The Man Who Would Be King" use the importance of the
gods to make themselves appear as gods, and in Things Fall Apart the characters know that the gods
are important for their success in life. My paper will examine how the belief in gods influences the
characters of the stories.
In Achebe's Things Fall Apart the Ibo people have many gods life and they believed the gods
determine their lives which influenced what they did. The Ibo people gave praise to their gods
through sacrificial acts. Unoka says, "Every year... before I put any crop in the earth, I sacrifice A
cock to Ani, the owner of all land. I also kill a cock at the shrine of Ifejioku, the god of yams"
(Achebe 17). The Ibo people felt that their crop success was determined by their sacrifices to their
gods not by whether they planted good or bad crops. The gods ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Ibo people believed in the chi which is their own personal god that determined their destiny.
Okonkwo does everything he can not to be like his father, Unoka, who was seen as a failure.
Okonkwo thinks his father's chi was the reason he was a failure. It is said that Unoka "had a bad chi
or personal god," (Achebe 18) which is why he amounted to nothing, but by believing in the chi
Okonkwo lived his life to prevent failure happening to himself, but he could not prevent his failure
because of his chi. Achebe says, "A man could not rise beyond the destiny of his chi" (Achebe 131)
which means that Okonkwo's evil or bad chi was always going to bring him failure in life no matter
what because that was his destiny. For the Ibo it was up to the gods whether they had a successful
life not their hard work; the more they pleased the gods the better their life would

Macbeths Power Essay
Throughout reading the play, Macbeth changes a lot from being a man of loyalty and honesty, to a
man of whom is power hungry and greedy. This shows how the more power you receive the more
power you want; which in many cases, such as this one leads to destruction. Many of the choices
that Macbeth made were influenced by the power that he had, and this power began to take over
him. This then lead to greed and destruction of not only others, but himself as well.
     In the beginning of the play, Macbeth is not in a position of
authority yet still receives praise. Although Macbeth is not in a place of power, he is truly content
with his life. Macbeth is looked up to and admired for begin so brave and courageous. In ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But little did the king know that this taste of power would bring out new dangerous qualities in
Macbeth.      Once Macbeth possessed the power of being Thane
of Cawdor he began to exhibit more greed. He has just been given such a huge responsibility and
once he was given new power, he craved more; especially when he stumbled upon the witches. He
liked the power that he had and wanted to gain more, no matter what he has to do to get it. Macbeth
had an encounter with the three witches and they had told him that he will become the next king.
Although the witches did say this it did not mean that it was certain, it was just a possibility. But
when Macbeth realized the opportunity for power he knew he wanted to become the king. This
passage was in part of the letter that Macbeth wrote to Lady Macbeth: "Whiles I stood rapt in the
wonder of it came missives from the King, who all–hailed me 'Thane of Cawdor,' by which title,
before, these Weird Sisters saluted me and referred me to the coming on of time with 'Hail, king that
shalt be'" (1.5.6–10). . It seems as if the power and greed now had full control over him, he is doing
things that he wouldn't do when he did not have all this power. This is the first time that we see this
side of Macbeth, the side of him that is greedy for power and is willing to kill the king to do so. In
the beginning of the play the thought of being Thane of Cawdor never even crossed his mind, and by
no means being

How Did Martin Luther King Benefit Modern Society
"I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear"–Martin Luther King Jr. king
was a peaceful man, he always stood for no violence. In his marches and protests they were always
peaceful even if the blacks got beaten, they still stood for their nonviolent protest. King was one of
the first black man to be a great powerful leader, he showed blacks that they could be one. Martin
Luther king has positively benefitted modern society by helping end segregation. King, helped the
bus boycott, after Rosa parks was arrested for sitting down in a black section on the bus, and refused
to moved for a white man. ( how to analyze the working of martin Luther king Jr.). As the leader of
the civil rights movement, King recognized

Macbeth Blood Will Have Blood Character Analysis
People are defined by who they are and what they do. In Shakespeare's the Tragedy of Macbeth, the
character Macbeth shows some characteristics of a good king. However, the power leads him to
become a villain. Power can change a person's life. Macbeth undergoes a tremendous change that
reveals the evil in him. He realizes that in order to gain power he would have to do something he
never did before. After talking to his wife, he knows that King Duncan has to be killed. When
Macbeth says "Blood will have blood," the idea is that killing will lead to only more killing (3.4).
He sees that more people will have to die to get what he wants. When Having power, it can change
the person inside. Macbeth will not stop at anything to remain king and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Lady Macbeth accused him of cowardice and dangled bright prospects of his future before his eyes
so that Macbeth would kill the king (Foster). Macbeth really killed the King because he thought it
would make him a powerful man. If he wouldn't have killed King Duncan, I would have made him
feel less of a man. Lady Macbeth had a nervous break down knowing she wasn't going to kill
anyone. She states "He could not miss ' em .Had he not resembled my father as he kept, I had don't"
(2.2). Lady Macbeth is just making up excuses because she know that she can kill anybody. She
wanted somebody to do her work for her that's why Macbeth stepped up as a man and did what he
had to do. Macbeth showed that he was willing to do anything that came in this way for the throne.
Lady Macbeth showed that she is no the true villain because she started acting crazy over the
murder of King Duncan and she killed herself from the gilt of what she had

Martin Luther King Successful
Have you ever thought about why the leaders of massive revolutions such as the Indian
Independence Movement and the Civil Rights Movement were so successful at initiating change and
getting others to be receptive? Recently, on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, I watched King's famous, "I
have a Dream" speech that took place on August 28, 1963, following the March on Washington.
While watching, I became very interested and curious about why King was the leader of this
movement. After all, he was one in millions who had suffered from the injustice and cruelty brought
upon the black minority by the white majority. So why King? After analyzing the "I have a Dream"
speech several times, I came to the conclusion that the main reasons why King was a successful ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Love is the most powerful force in the universe and King understood this. Despite the fact that he
and his people had been treated with nothing but fear, hate, and cruelty from white men, he had a
great understanding that this same behavior would not solve the issue. You cannot fight fire with
fire. Like many other successful revolutions, King knew that love and peaceful protest was the only
way anything was going to change for his people. King preached that the only way to make an
enemy a friend is through love. Although it may have been very difficult for the majority of black
people to choose love over fear when they hadn't received love their entire lives, he strongly
encouraged his people to not hate the white man, for it would simply make the problem worse. King
understood the only way to achieve true equality is with brotherhood, acceptance, and love for all
living beings. This only begins to scratch the surface of what made Martin Luther King an incredible
leader who made history. By looking at how King was able to communicate his ideas effectively, we
can apply the techniques he used in our own lives in order to become better communicators.
Communicating is certainly one of our greatest assets as human beings and it is a skill that can
change the world, as Martin demonstrated on August 28th, 1963. Through passion, authenticity, and
love,

How Is Oedipus Selfish
The well–known play "Oedipus The King" was constructed by a great Greek writer named
Sophocles. "Oedipus The King" was quite an extravagant and dramatic play. The play is about a tale
of an inevitable fate for the king of Thebes. Oedipus was the king of Thebes, and villagers came to
him because they were in grave danger. The town was consumed by the terrible "Black Death"
known as the bubonic plague. Immediately, the king took initiative to do anything that he could
possibly do to bring health back to the people. However, what Oedipus did not know is that the only
way was to kill the person who killed the former king of Thebes, Laios. As the play progresses,
Oedipus is told his fate early on of his journey. Furthermore, along the play, Oedipus showed strong,
studious, and king–like characteristics. Oedipus was a tenacious being; additionally, he displayed
unbiased, penitent, and noble characteristics. First, Oedipus was a tenacious King. When faced with
obstacles, he would not stop until the problem was resolved. He displayed his persistent ways
numerous times. For example, Oedipus said, "Tell me, and never doubt that I will help you in every
way I can; I should be heartless" (Sophocles, 1207). He promised to the priest and people, that no
matter the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was an extremely righteous, dignified, and virtuous man. Only certain people would be called
"Great Oedipus, O powerful King of Thebes" (Sophocles, 1207). He was an individual who must
have had a long history of accomplishing great deeds to be called such. Additionally, how Oedipus
acted towards the end of the play provides even more support of his honorable ways. He put his ego
to the side and left he town and isolated himself. Furthermore, the young would "cling to your altar
steps" (Sophocles, 1207). The young, who have not even lived around long enough, have heard the
tales and nobleness of their Kings deeds. This shows that he was an astounding

Describe The Conventions Of A Fairy Tale
1. The genre of the story would be a fairy tale. The reason I say this is a fairytale is because in the
story it talks about if the soldier was to put on a cloak he would disappear. Another genre for this
story would be a folk tale.
2. The exposition of this story includes the fact that the king has a large family. This includes twelve
daughters that have to be kept a close eye on. For some reason they all have to share one bedroom.
The royal family suspects that they are not spending their nights at home.
3. The rising action would be when the king orders many people to sit and watch the twelve
daughters at night but they don't accomplish the orders that the king gives them so they were killed
after three days of trying. No one could ever

The defence speech for Macbeth as a murderer
Ladies and gentleman of the jury. Sitting before you today is a man accused of the murder of
Duncan, the King of Scotland. The prosecution will portray Macbeth as an ambitious man, one who
plotted to murder his own cousin, so that he could lay claim to the title of the crown. But the issue in
this case is not whether Macbeth murdered the deceased. This fact is not disputed. What you must
determine is whether Macbeth was of sound mind when he committed this act. Evidence showed
that this was not so. In fact, Macbeth was the victim in this crime. It was he, who was possessed and
brainwashed by the evil witches. Then it was Lady Macbeth who took advantage of his state of
mind. She pushed him over the edge to fulfil her ambitions of being ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Macbeth was a virtuous man. There can be no greater recommendation than the king himself. He
covered him with praise "O valiant cousin! Worthy gentleman!" after Macbeth rid the country of
rebels within the ranks and the "multiplying villainies of nature". The king 's trust

How Did Martin Luther King Influence The Civil Rights...
"Most human beings would have never been pained by the death of a human being if they had never
seen a human being or pretending to be pained by that." The Civil Rights Movement arose in the
1950s, when individuals such as MLK and Martin Luther King began to resist segregation and led
movements that pressured lawmakers to make changes. Martin Luther King was a nonconformist
that changed race relations for the greater good.
The actions that have led The Civil Rights Movement was about how African Americans were
getting treated. On December 5, 1955 Rosa Parks was arrested because she was sitting at the front of
the bus, she decided not to get up and let a white man sit. Today if an African American sat in front
of the bus and gets arrested ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While MLK well known "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" he stated " But I must confess that I am
not afraid of the word "tension."I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of
constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth." (King,1963,p.3) MLK spoke about
himself that he is not afraid of having any problems with others, he won't let things come in his way,
but he isn't a violent person that there are different ways of getting development regardless of
anything he will find a way within the law to fighting for these civilians' rights. "Injustice anywhere
is a threat to justice everywhere.We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a
single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly." (King,1963,p.4)
Martin Luther King talked about people coming together that there is many unfair justice out here it
doesn't just affect that one person it affects the whole society. "I submit that an individual who
breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who is willing accepts the penalty of
imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality
expressing the highest respect for law."(King, 1963,p.5) MLK described that people who do the
wrong thing against the law his mindset tells him that he is wrong, but whoever is willing to take the
punishment and be sentenced for their wrongdoings to do the greater good for their society it is
considered injustice which is following the law he respected the law he went to jail he took his
punishment for the greater good of his society that he fights for. Martin Luther King Jr. is a man that
fought for other people's rights and their freedom they believe in the letter of "Letter from
Birmingham Jail" he is describing about how people should come together and

Rudyard Kipling's The Man Who Would Be King Essay
Rudyard Kipling's "The Man who Would Be King" deals with man's ability to rule. The character
Dravot's success and failure in ruling derives from the perception of him as a god, instead of a king.
Kipling uses the perception of Dravot as a god to show that though a king can rule as a god, he
becomes a king by being human.
Dravot gains kingly power by being perceived as a god. The perception of him as a god occurs
through his actions and luck. After helping the first village Peachy and he find in Kafiristan, Dravot
takes power from the former leaders. He becomes more than a leader to the people, however, as
"every morning Dravot sat by the side of old Imbra, and the people came and worshipped. That was
Dravot's order" (92). By ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He has the symbol for Grand Master sewn onto an apron that he wears in front of a priest, and "the
old chap falls flat on his face at Dravot's feet and kisses em. 'Luck again,' says Dravot,' they say it's
the missing Mark that no one could understand the why of' " (95). The displaying of the mark proves
Dravot as a god, since "only the Gods know that" (99). Dravot establishes his kingdom by ruling as
a god, not a king.
Dravot's perception as a god leads to his downfall by conflicting with his kingly aspirations. He
intends to establish a dynasty, and he needs "a Queen to breed a King's son for the King" (98).
Dravot plans to chose a woman from amongst his tribes; alas, his people are skeptical of this, for
"How can daughters of men marry Gods or Devils?" (99). Dravot's god appearance directly conflicts
with his aspiration for a dynasty; he cannot find a wife who will want him as a god, yet he needs a
woman to bear his children. He ignores all warnings and proceeds to find and marry his queen. The
downfall of Dravot occurs on his wedding day, as his bride bites him––" 'The slut's bitten me!' says
he, clapping his hand to his neck, and sure enough, his hand was red with blood" (100). The sight of
blood awakens the natives to Dravot's mortality. Shrieks of "Not a God, not a Devil, but only a
man!" (100) proclaim in the valley. The natives turn on Dravot, outraged at having thought him a
god.
Dravot's acceptance of death defines him as a king. He

Martin Luther King Eulogy For The 16th Street Baptist...
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a man who spoke of peace. He preached equality. His faith was what
drove him. He dreamed of of a world where blacks and whites could live together in harmony. He
was the epitome of kindness.This is what we're taught in elementary. This god almighty man of
great righteousness. Don't get me wrong I love and admire King for all that he did for the civil rights
movement. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a man who spoke of peace. He preached equality. His
faith was what drove him. He wanted to lead a peaceful revolution. He knew what he had to do
given the time period he was in. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was an intelligent man. He lived in an
era of white dominance. In a sense we still do. This meant he had to be smart. Everything he said
would be interpreted as political. That's just the way things went. Especially for such a powerful
african man such as himself. On September 15, 1963, the bomb exploded at the 16th Street Baptist
Church. The church members had been preparing for Sunday mass. This racially charged attack
related in the death of four young black girls. Three days later King wrote a eulogy for them. In
Eulogy For The Victims of The 16th Street Baptist Church Bombing, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
uses rhetoric persuasion and poetic references to sympathize white people. The speech "Eulogy For
The Victims of The 16th Street Baptist Church Bombing" by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. could be
read and interpreted differently by white southerners

King Henry As A Good King In William Shakespeare's Henry V
What does it mean to be a king as compared to a man? William Shakespeare's work Henry V
attempts to answer this question with a title character who is both. King Henry's morality, defined by
his deeply complex character, rests precariously on the title he is defined by: should he be judged
solely as a king or also as a man? The label makes a difference. Through his actions and leadership
during the play, Henry proves himself to be a good king, one worthy of respect and admiration.
However, at the same time, the same actions do not always reveal a particularly good or virtuous
man. Highlighting the disparity between the two roles, Shakespeare intended for King Henry to be
admired and respected as a good king but not necessarily as a good man.
To understand this distinction, one must first recognize that the qualities that make up a good king
often diverge from those attributed to a good man. For example, to be considered a good man, one
might try to be forgiving and tolerant; however, to be a good king, one often has to be exactly the
opposite. Why does this make sense? It is not because a king is naturally unforgiving or refuses to
take the high road; instead, he has a higher purpose than to be kind to those immediately around
him. To be a good king, one cannot be an emotional creature, but instead be a calculating one. He
should put the needs of his kingdom above all other things, including his own desires or whims. A
good king recognizes that he must serve, protect, and

Deception In The Open Window And The Man Who Would Be King
Has deception ever been the right choice, for anyone, no matter the cause? Deception is the practice
of deceiving a person for personal gain, many whom practice deception have personal reasons, some
for a reason people see as either right or wrong .Deception is the cause of either problems or a
solution in two stories. One is "The Open Window", by H. H. Munroe, and "The Man Who Would
Be King", by Rudyard Kipling. These short stories are shining example of deception, and how the
practice can either aid a person or ruin a person. There are two completely distinct people from each
story used deception to their advantage, with different results. Deception is used in different
contexts, with a variety of reasons, and the deception used turns out

The Man Who Would Be King by Director John Houston
While The Man Who Would Be King director John Huston may have made an effort to mitigate
some of the overwhelmingly imperialist perspectives in his adaptation of Rudyard Kipling's novel,
many depictions of the Easterners in his film still have the air of Western superiority. In fact, if
Huston had completely removed this aspect of Kipling's tale from the story, the film would no
longer be a faithful representation of the original work. The events of the drama are told from the
perspective of a proper Englishman, a sophisticated newspaper reporter who is prominently referred
to as a Freemason. These characteristics alone introduce a superior air to the work, as the narrator's
occupation establishes him not only as a rational thinker, but a questioner, a skeptic not easily
confounded by lies or superstition, and a seeker of truth. The reference to his involvement with the
Freemasons only emphasizes his grounding in Western culture, his acceptance by his peers, his
likely wealthy background, and his influence. The calm intelligence of the narrator is contrasted
with the other two representations of the West, Daniel Dravot and Peachy Carnehan. These are
presented as criminals who have dabbled in thievery, smuggling, conning, and blackmailing, in spite
of having believed in and fought for the expansion of the British empire. When they realize that
their loyalty to the British throne will have garnered them very little at home, they decide to create
their own wealth by deceiving

Personality Change In Macbeth
In William Shakespeare's "Macbeth", the title character undergoes a serious personality change. At
the plays beginning Macbeth is a loyal and honorable man who, unfortunately, is immensely
ambitious. As the play progresses however, Macbeth begins to lose the honor that he held onto so
dearly. Macbeths descent into dishonor is displayed in the two most prominent murders in the first 3
acts: the slaying of Duncan and the assassination of Banquo. When Lady Macbeth is convincing her
husband to murder the king, the reader is able to detect his hesitation to commit such a heinous
crime. Also, the remorse Macbeth feels after he murders Duncan proves that he still possesses some
of that honor and loyalty he originally held in such high regard. However, when Macbeth has
Banquo killed he has changed into a cold and evil man. He, Macbeth, no longer clings to his honor
and loyalty. In "Macbeth" by William Shakespeare, Macbeth`s has a personality shift that is
showcased in the murders of King Duncan and Banquo. Macbeth is originally depicted as an
honorable and loyal man. However his ambition and his wife lead him to do things he would never
dream of without those influences. The hesitation that Macbeth shows when thinking about
murdering Duncan proves that he started out as an honorable man: "I have no spur/ To prick the
sides of my intent, but only/ Vaulting ambition" (pg. 40 ll 25–27). Without the prodding of his wife,
Macbeth never would have committed the murder of King Duncan.

Comparing Obsession In The Tell-Tale Heart And The Lion King
Thesis: With increasingly darkening imagery, Poe's The Tell–Tale Heart and Disney's The Lion King
prove that obsession eats at the heart, consumes the mind, and results in self–destruction.
Intro
Darkening imagery works hand in hand with increasing obsession in these works. Poe's The Tell–
Tale Heart is able to clearly the depict the power of the mind and it's ability to provoke the darkest
of thoughts. In The Tell–Tale Heart, the man is disturbed by the old man's blurred eye and becomes
obsessed with it. The man is a psychological mess and believes the old man's blurred eye can see
beyond what an average eye can. The man feels threatened by the old man's thought up ability. He
fears that the old man would betray him one day with the ability ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The man allows the thought of the eye and its ability to see things "differently" consume him alive.
The man lives in great fear of the eye and that's the only thing he can think about. The man is so
disturbed by the evil eye he plans on dismembering it from the old man since it makes him so
uncomfortable. " When the old man looked at me with his vulture eye a cold feeling went up and
down my back; even my blood became cold. And so I finally decided I had to kill the old man and
close that eye forever" (Poe Web). The man has failed the test and has murdered the old man, he
later realizes that he was wrong for killing the old man; his true intent was to remove the eye. " For
it was not the old man I felt I had to kill; it was the eye, his Evil Eye"(Poe Web). This line form the
man, closes relates with The Lion King. Scar wanted to kill his brother, not because he didn't like
him, just because he wanted to be king and Scar was in the way of that. The man didn't intend to kill
the old man, his unsafe feelings towards the eye lead to him killing the old

The Man Who Would Be King Analysis
Rudyard Kipling's novella,"The Man Who Would Be King", is about two English men, Daniel
Dravot and Peachey Carnehan, who are cons artists that live in India with the goal of becoming the
kings of Kafiristan. The story is told through a narrator, an Englishman, that stumbles upon the two
characters through a strange interaction at a train station. After meeting up with the narrator at his
job, Dravot and Carnehan gather as much information as they can about Kafiristan and head off in
disguise for their journey to becoming kings. There are many similarities regarding how and why
the British Empire and Dravot and Carnehan came to imperialize these Indian countries. Throughout
the whole novella, Kipling uses the story as a way to display ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Kipling also showed how the English empire thought they were superior to the natives of India and
Kafiristan in multiple ways. Dravot would compliment the natives he was ruling over by calling
them English, "These men aren't Indian, they are English." This implies that being English is the
right way to act. Kipling also displayed English superiority when Dravot refused to listen to the
people he was ruling when they protested against him marrying a woman that was not a god.
Kipling too thought that the British gained power in a corrupt manner. This was revealed when
Dravot claimed to be friends with one of the gods the Kafiristan people worshipped. Both Dravot
and Carnehan took advantage of the natives in a fraudulent manner as did the British. Kipling
further showed how he thought the style the British were ruling was poor because both Dravot and
Carnehan mimicked British methods. Both characters created a contract, modernized the country
they took over, and brought new rules, just like the English. In both the story and reality, the people
rebel against the English to reclaim their Independence. Through symbolism, Kipling uses each
character from the novella to display some aspect of the British Empire in a way that reflected his
views. Carnehan represents the expanding aspect of British imperialism. Carnehan actually wants to
grow Kafiristan and care for the people. Dravot represents the monarchy itself by having a

To What Extent Is Lady Macbeth A Tragic Hero
A tragic hero is a character who does wrong for their benefit, but leads in a great downfall. There are
many tragic heroes in famous literature all over the world. These tragic heroes show their flaws
leading to a tragedy. In the play Macbeth written by William Shakespeare, the main character
Macbeth is a tragic hero because of his wife, Lady Macbeth manipulating him and desire to become
king. Macbeth's selfish actions led to his tragic death. In the beginning of the play both Macbeth and
Lady Macbeth are good people who were honorable to their country, Scotland. Macbeth was a true
warrior that fought for King Duncan. Lady Macbeth was a lovable innocent woman that supported
her husband. After Macbeth hears the prophecies from the witches he becomes curious about being
King of Scotland. It is his wife, Lady Macbeth who sparks the idea of killing King Duncan. Lady
Macbeth planned on killing King Duncan herself in his sleep, but could not: "...I laid their daggers
ready; He could not miss 'em. Had he not resembled My father as he slept, I had done 't..." (Act 2
Scene 2). If King Duncan did not look similar to Lady Macbeth's father she would have killed him
herself. Lady Macbeth manages to convince Macbeth to kill King Duncan to get to his way to
becoming king. She starts to intimate Macbeth by calling him a coward since he starts to have
second thoughts about the plan. Lady Macbeth knows Macbeth weakness and how to use it against.
She ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Due to the faults of every tragic hero he led to a downfall because of his desire to become king and
Lady Macbeth's, his wife, influence on him. Some might state that Macbeth is not a tragic hero
because his punishment of his own death was not deserved from the crimes he committed, but
Macbeth is a tragic hero since his downfall is his own fault. Macbeth has changed from a lovable
man to a dangerous villain because of his own

Symbolism In 'The Tale Of The Enchanted King'?
The story, "The Tale of the Enchanted King", is about how the King is turned into half man half
stone because his wife cheated on him. The king discovered his wife cheating outside the city walls
and sliced the lover's throat to kill him, but the sword only cut the skin and flesh. Because of this,
the wife came home and eventually but a spell on the king, turning him into half man and half stone.
The scene when the king follows his wife to the city gate and follows her still to find her with her
lover is ironic. The imagery depicts a poor citizen's shack with minimal furniture and luxury, yet the
wife treats the black man as if he was a king. The king saw the hut that was "built with palm leaves,
leading to a domed structure built with sun–dried bricks" (57). The king does not express how large
the structure is, so the reader must interpret that his/her own way. The king also notices that the
new–found lover sits on "reed shavings and dressed in tatters" (57). This man does not have enough
money to dress like a king, yet the king's wife treats him like royalty. The wife "kissed the ground
before him," which is the way to greet people of royalty. The wife greets this "king" by saying "'O
my lord and lover'" (57). Here, she even admits that this man, "a decrepit black man," is of higher
status than she, the wife of the king. The wife goes on to explain to her "lord and lover" why she is
late. She tells him that she is married to her cousin, "who finds me most

Examples Of Innocents In Macbeth
Murder of Innocents in Macbeth
In Shakespeare's play Macbeth, innocent life's die like King Duncan one of the kindest men in this
play, young Siward an innocent young boy who died fighting and Banquo one of Macbeth's closest
friend. The innocents of the people who died in Macbeth were not just King Duncan, young Siward
and Banquo, Macbeth had more people killed it was as if once he killed one person the other people
were just in his way and needed to be gone. The murder of innocents is shown through King
Duncan, young Siward and Banquo.
The innocence of King Duncan is terminated when Macbeth murders him. Macbeth was a very kind
man but his ambition got him to do bad things; it went too far, he went through so much just to kill
king Duncan

Essay On How Did Andrew Jackson Act Like A King
It is clear from the documents that Andrew Jackson acted like a king. One reason that Andrew
Jackson acted like a king was because he owned slaves throughout his lifetime. Document 7 states
that he owned the most slaves when he was president. He acted like a king because you can not own
the common man if you are the common man. This means that if Andrew Jackson was the hero of
the common man, he would not be able to own slaves. The slaves WERE the common men. If
Andrew Jackson was one of them he would've been working for someone, but instead he acted like
a king because he was the one having common men work for him. In class we learned that during
Jackson's lifetime, he owned 300 slaves! That is a lot to people to own and have work

Colonialism and Morality in The Moonstone and The Man Who...
Colonialism and Morality in The Moonstone and The Man Who Would Be King
Let us presuppose to begin with that the cursed jewel is an impossibility and the powers of the
Moonstone or any other gem for that matter only exist on an atomic level ( i.e. the energies which
bind such objects together and make them what they are). Additionally it should be considered that
no such object is the means by which a being exerts powers and no such object consciously exerts
powers itself. Notions of the cursed or powerful jewel can be seen as a bi–product of what Said
terms "Orientalism." Said describes "The Orient" as "almost a European invention," a place of
"exotic beings and remarkable experiences." (Ashcroft et al ed. p.87) This hypothesis ... Show more
The Moonstone is a narrative device which illuminates the text in multiple ways.
Such a device remains popular in western adventure literature and film, whether in the form of an
Egyptian scarab or a monkey's claw. The mystical object with powerful properties is involved in
adventure tales from Conan–Doyle through Indiana Jones, even one of the most famous of modern
legends the fates of Carter and Caernarfon excavators of Tutankahmun's tomb involves a curse and
shameful Orientalism. Perhaps the best indicator of such notions becoming part of western folklore
is when they become utilised as simple metaphor. This is apparent in John Huston's 1975 film
version of Rudyard Kipling's The Man Who Would Be King. The desire of the central protagonists;
Peachy Carnahan and Daniel Dravitt to become "Kings" of an isolated region of the Indian sub–
continent is built upon by the abundance of treasures that becomes available to them, an aspect
absent from Kipling's original tale. Huston's version increases the greed of the two adventurers
which in turn provides a more satisfying justification of their fates than we receive in the original
short story.
Whilst admiring giant rubies Huston's Peachy remarks "All we need do is fill our pockets and we'd
be millionaires." Dravitt then retorts that if they stayed they would be "Kings." Carnahan
subsequently

Martin Luther King's Influence On American Culture
Write about a man and a woman that have influenced American culture. Include the following
information: Birthplace and family Educational / employment background Cultural significance /
contribution to society His/her impact on you as an individual Today i will be talking about and
influential man and woman that has influenced the american culture that we get to enjoy every day.
The male i chose to write about was a an abolitionist for the black rights movements. Martin Luther
King, Jr. went to morehouse college from 1944 to 1948 and then attended boston university from
1951 to 1955 The morning of January 15, 1929 Dr king was born. at the family home in Atlanta,
Martin Luther King, Jr. was the first son and second child born to the Reverend ... Show more
king left us with, this one is believed to be one of the most influential and the most powerful. This
expression implies such a great amount to me in my day by day life, as well as seeing small signs of
it in my day to day life at convenient stores or just out in public. When I came to lincoln University
mo, everybody who attended orientation week was informed that although we are different we are
all here for one cause, DR. Rome had everyone in richardson auditorium stand up and say that we
will watch over one another because we are all brothers and sisters. Dr. King's quote goes hand and
hand here also. This really is "A definitive measure" of a

Rise Of Daniel Research Paper
The Rise of Daniel Daniel was a man who was destined to be a hero. A hero, not for men, but for
God. Daniel was well educated,he shown great wisdom, and he demonstrated profound leadership in
his day. Along with his education,wisdom, and leadership, he also had the ability to interpreted
dreams. Daniel, who name means " God is Judge" was a man who show complete and unshakable
faith in his God. He was a man who showed courage and resisted evil, even when his life was
threaten repeatedly. You see, this man was not picked by accident. He was destined to show the
people of Babylon,others, and us today, that he serves the one almighty God(the one who controls
all). Daniel Story begins around 600 BC, when he was a young man. Daniel grew up during the time
of Josiah Reign(2 Kings chapter 22–23). Daniel probably heard the prophet Jeremiah speaking about
the upcoming trouble. Daniel most likely saw and heard about Josiah death during the battle against
the Egyptians 609 BC. Daniel most likely Heard about the rise of Nebuchadnezzar, the supreme
leader of Babylon. He heard reports about his dominance (sweeping up nations after nations),
eventually leading to the door steps of Jerusalem. You see, Daniel sitting under the feet of King
Josiah and the prophet of Jeremiah at young age, was no accident. He saw a King and a prophet who
sought after God with all their heart, soul, and mind(2 Kings ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
King Nebuchadnezzar wasted little time in putting theses men to work. One particular type of work
he was looking for, was advisors, potential candidates among his political prisoners. This earthly
king had a kingdom to run, but one thing he forgets to realize. He is not God, but a man; God rule is
everlasting and his kingdom is eternal. You see, this earthly king had a lesson to learn, and God sent
the right candidate(Daniel) his way, to teach him a

Theme Of Masculinity In Macbeth
In the play "Macbeth" written by William Shakespeare, several characters become very selfish and
their behaviors end up destroying their loyalty to their own country, friends, and family. The unity
needed between a king and his colleagues is very important to ones country for not only the present
but also far in the future. Typically if the king has a son for a child than he shall be king after the
father dies, but there are several characters that believe that they should be king or that their families
should be higher up in society. The country of Scotland needs a new king who is well rounded in the
traits of love, faith, courage and strength. A noble leader is presented but does he have the willpower
to deserve this royalty? An important theme demonstrated in the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
A true man has the ideals of strength, courage, and love while in the play Shakespeare makes it very
clear that the main focuses of a man are strength, power, the force of will, and physical courage.
Intelligence and morals are not very much touched upon or associated with a true man in Macbeth.
All the character at one point or another question each others manhood or masculinity. However it
seems that Lady Macbeth is the most masculine of them all. She uses her husband several times;
aware that he will perform the actions that she wishes upon. The suspicion that manhood is bias to
violence is a strong recurring theme. Lady Macbeth even states that she wishes to be a man in order
to perform her husbands requests sent upon her. "Come, you spirits / That tend on mortal thoughts,
unsex me here, / And fill me from the crown to the toe top–full / Of direst cruelty." (I,v, 30–33) She
can not believe that her husband is being so scared to perform such a simple act in her eyes. She has
came up with the plan on how to perform this killing of Duncan but all she needs is her husband
Macbeth to man up and perform this

William Shakespeare 's ' Macbeth '
For my essay four I decided to read "Macbeth" by William Shakespeare. The first time I read it, I
kind of understood what it was about, but didn't really understand it that well. So after doing some
research about William Shakespeare and "Macbeth," I re–read "Macbeth," as well as watched the
movie. After this I wondered what William Shakespeare was trying to portray by writing "Macbeth".
At first I thought that he was trying to present the audience with an experience of himself or he was
writing about someone else, but after conducting some research I realized that there were many
reasons why he could have written Macbeth. Before I begin talking about what I found in my
research let me tell you what the tragedy of "Macbeth" is about. It ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This makes it seem as if they are at the service of the King and will do what he wants them to do.
According to the article "James I" he was a man who was very interested in the supernatural and
knew a lot about witchcraft (Matthew,1). He knew so much that he even wrote a book called
Daemonologie. This is very interesting because Shakespeare begins Macbeth with three witches and
has them be important characters all throughout the play. This shows that there was some connection
between Macbeth and Shakespeare trying to please the king. Another thing that I though was pretty
interesting about the way in which Shakespeare wrote this piece was that the character Macbeth
becomes king of Scotland and not England. This kind of does not make sense because Shakespeare
was from England and King James was from Scotland. While I was not able to find much about this
online I think that with a little more interpretation of the text and looking a little more at what
Shakespeare says in the play I think that I can find more connection points in order to make this a
valid statement. While looking up the real Macbeth in the article "Shakespeare's Sources for
Macbeth" it mentioned "that the attention that Shakespeare payed to Macbeths conscience would
have been of particular interest to King James because he was also very interested in things that had
to do with the human conscience that he even wrote a book to his son called Basilicon Doron where

The Man Who Would Be King Imperialism
Imperialism is "the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign
countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies." Rudyard Kipling has expressed
his beliefs towards imperialism and its meaning in several of his works, especially in "The Man
Who Would Be King". In this particular story, two Englishmen go on a dangerous journey to
Kafiristan, where they share the drams to become kings soon after their arrival. This is similar to the
expansion of the British Empire when it was first developing. The British have taken over many
territories around the world,including Europe, North and South America, the Caribbean, and the
Middle East. In many of these places the British have discovered natural resources ... Show more
The idea to take over the natives and their villages was all part of their plan. The two Englishmen
did not leave India without weapons. They had their camels carry twenty martini rifles that they had
hid under a large pile of whirligigs and children's mud toys. The action shocked the narrator as
Kipling did not expect his friends to be so prepared to take the throne. This showed that Dravot and
Carnehan were very serious about becoming kings, so much so that they were willing to use force.
After a couple attacks on the Indians, the Englishmen spoke to some village chiefs and had lied to
them about their identities, they wanted to create fear among them. Dravot states, "This is a
tremenjus business, and we've got the whole country as far as its worth having. I am the son of
Alexander by Queen Semiramis, and you're my younger brother and a god too!" in this quote Dravot
is explaining to Carnehan how the natives view them as gods not humans. Carnehan recalls in
another scene that Dravot also promised the Indians that "every man [would] eat in peace and drink
in quiet" in exchange for their obedience. His rehearsed speech worked in hi favor as he gained the
loyalty he wanted. Kipling probably included this in his story to introduce to the reader the concept
of "noblesse oblige" and how the Englishmen used it to their

Macbeth Interview
Interviewer: Hello Macbeth. Thank you for attending this interview. Would you mind briefing me
your whole story?
Macbeth: Yes, of course but it's rather intricate.
Interviewer: Why do you think your story is intricate?
Macbeth: My story is rather unpredictable one and it is all due to my hasty decisions. I basically
killed the King of Scotland to become the King and I was defeated in a battle and lost my power as
king! I misused my power as a king and I suffered.
Interviewer: That was quite a story. There's a saying, with great power, comes great responsibility.
But you becoming King, don't you think you abused your power? Since the start?
Macbeth: I was materialistic, very selfish and believed the witches and wanted everything they said
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Macbeth: From the story it is quite evident how I went from being a brave and courageous man to
becoming a lowly person who has to kill someone to attain power. This just showed that power
corrupts ambition. My nature degraded and this I resorted to killing and/or murdering others'
families who were in my way of becoming the king. My degrading nature also affected my
ambition, before I viewed attaining the power of becoming the King as an honor but due to my
wife's persuasion, I rather viewed it as a challenge and made sure that I acquired it. This ended up
having a negative impact on all the other characters in the story. From the guards to the little
children, no one was spared. Many lost their families, children lost their fathers and vice versa. I
became so caught up with the power of becoming the King that I even lost my wife. Even she had
become corrupt with power but guilt caught up to her earlier than me and she killed herself. It was
such a shame!
Interviewer: If you could have the chance to change your actions and rectify what you had done,
what would you do? How would your resulting new actions have a different impact on what will

King Malici Chapter Summaries

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to King Malici Chapter Summaries

Similar to King Malici Chapter Summaries (12)

More from Veronica Smith

More from Veronica Smith (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

King Malici Chapter Summaries