Julius Caesar War Essay

Julius Caesar War Essay
The war of Gaul was between the Romans and the Gallic Tribes. Gaul is Latin and is located in Western Europe which is now known as France,
Northern Italy, most of Switzerland and Belgium; Gaul back then Gaul wasn't a unified country. The war has lasted from fifty– eight B.C to fifty B.C.
There was two main conflict between the Romans and the Celts. Gauls territory was North of Italy, they were Celtic people living in Western Europe.
Julius Caesar was the most important general for the Roman Empire while Vercingetorix was the important general for the Gallic tribes.The two
generals were fighting over land, glory, trade in the form of rivers and past conflict.
Roman tribes tried to conquer Gaul, the Romans had Julius Caesar and sixty – thousand ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For protection he used helmets and shields, they had chariots and six thousand horses, but most of the army traveled by foot. Vercingetorix used the
same weapons, protection, and traveling equipment. Both of the generals attacked each other out of surprise harder and more brutal than the last
attack. One of Caesar's plan was to close in the Gallic Tribes which would limit their food and water source even when they would ration it, he gave
them thirty days for Vercingetorix to feed his army until it's all gone. Vercingetorix made a plan to interrupt the Romans, but Caesar ordered more
precise traps and to build up more walls for
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Battle Of Alesia On The Roman Republic
My essay is about the Battle of Alesia that took place in 52 BC, by the Roman dictator Julius Caesar. Rome went to war with the Gallic tribes from
58 BC to 50 BC, these wars ended with the win in Alesia in 52 BC. The Romans had a lot of victories and that made the Roman Republic expand over
all of Gaul. This battle win in Alesia made Julius Caesar head ruler of the Roman Republic.
The background of the battle started in 54–53 BC when the Carnutes killed the pro–Roman ruler Tasgetius. After that incident Caesar sent some troops
to Gaul to get rid of any possible threats. After sending his troops there they were attacked and after getting ambushed they were then defeated. Caesar
lost a quarter of his troops, he tried to get help from Rome ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To create a good defense, Caesar had his men make a set of fortifications around Alesia. It was about 18 kilometers round. It did not take long to
build these walls they were set up by two four and a half meter wide ditches and they were four and a half meters deep. There was one ditch close to
the wall and they filled it with water and set up traps. By the ditches the Romans had watch towers filled with ammunition. Vercingetorix 's cavalry
often attacked the construction sites trying to prevent full enclosure. The Roman troops fought back and kept them away. Because it was taking
long, some of the Gallic troops managed to escape from areas that were not finished. Caesar was not happy with just the one wall and wanted more
protection so he had the men build another one. He had it pointing outward in order to surround his army. The second wall was the same as the first
and it was able to include four troops of men. These walls were put in place to help protect the Roman troops from the Gallic troops, who were strong
and determined to win the Romans.
At the time, living in Alesia was very bad. With about 80,000 soldiers and the civilian population there were too many people that were inside the
country for the tiny amount of food that they had. The Gauls decided to get rid of the children and the women from the city to save the remaining
food for the warriors. The Gauls were hoping that Caesar would allow the women and children an opening to let them go. Caesar did

The Celts And The Celtic World
Knowledge of the Celts and the Celtic world has been acquired and accumulated through a variety of mediums such as archaeological evidence,
geographical markings and most importantly, the testimonies left by Greek and Roman writers. Without these writings, developing an image of the
nature of the Celts would be extremely difficult. Comparing two authors, Roman emperor, Julius Caesar to Greek writer, Athenaeus, it may reveal some
of the prejudices and biased views held against the Celts, but more importantly by contrasting the views of these particular authors, it also offers a
well–rounded account of the history and culture of these Celtic–speaking people.
Athenaeus was a Greek writer, who wrote around the time of 200AD. He is the author of Deipnosophistae, a piece of literature all about eating and
dining traditions. Athenaeus is writing during a time known as The Poseidonian Tradition; Poseidonios inspired a lot of Greek writers to write and
keep record of the Celts and their culture. Athenaeus quotes Poseidonios in his Deipnosophistae as he has first hand experience of the Celts, having
travelled around studying the Celts. Poseidonios' work only survives through the work of later authors, such as Athenaeus. Athenaeus speaks of how
Poseidonios observed the Celts during a feast, taking note of their customs, Athenaeus' discourse is written in such a way that the impression left is that
the Greeks may have considered themselves more evolved than the Celts they were

Learning About Celts Through Roman Authors Essay
Learning About Celts Through Roman Authors
The Celts left very little written documentation behind them. What is known about the Celts has been discovered through archaeology and through
the writings of Roman authors such as Caesar, Strabo and Tacitus. Caesar wrote about the Celts in his Gallic Wars as he documented his arrivals in
Britain in 55 and 55 BC. Strabo was a Roman geographer, and included his knowledge of the geography of Britain in his texts, and Tacitus in his
"Agricola", his histories and his annals also wrote of his knowledge of the Celts. These three authors, amongst others, gave us written evidence of the
agricultural lifestyle of the Celts, their trading, commerce and economy, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Caesar's geography, considering the time of writing, was fairly accurate as far as measurements were concerned. It seemed to be a popular Roman
belief that the western side of Britain faced Spain, as both Caesar and Tacitus wrote of this, although it is not true. Caesar questioned the natives as to
the size of the island and also had Volusenus make a general reconnaissance of the area, which could account for his apparent accuracy of
measurements and other geographical points that he made. He was fairly accurate, although vague, about Ireland, saying that it was the same distance
from Gaul as Britain and about half its size. His knowledge of the whereabouts of the Isle of Man was also accurate.
Tacitus is very self–assured of his knowledge of Britain's geography, assuring the reader that "where my predecessors relied on style to adorn their
guesses, I shall offer assured fact." He stated that Britain was the largest island known to the Romans, and followed the general idea that Britain faced
Spain to the west, Gaul to the south and Germany to the east. His knowledge of northern Britain was inaccurate and based on supposition, perhaps
showing that very few Romans (if indeed any) had yet ventured into Caledonia (although Tacitus did say that a Roman fleet had circumnavigated the
island). Tacitus

Julius Caesar Conflicts
Mia Gorman Bell 5 Mrs. Thomas 5 December, 2017 The Fall of The Roman Republic(52–50 B.C.) In the years 52–50 B.C. there were multiple
conflicts in the Roman Empire. Caesar was in Alesia attempting to conquer Gaul, which affected Julius Caesar, Gaul, and Rome. In Rome, there was
conflict because Publius Claudius, who had been stirring trouble in the streets of Rome, was killed in 52 B.C. during the elections. His death caused
great chaos and resulted in a period with no leadership. Later Pompey began to rule because the citizens demanded organization, even though he was
not trusted by the Senate. The elections of 51 went smoothly, and everything seemed to be going well until March of 50 when conflict between
Pompey and Caesar led to a civil... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Metellus Scipio thought that Caesar's power in Gaul should be coming to an end. At this point Caesar's rule there depended on his relationship with
Pompey, who was still powerful in Rome. C. Scribonius Curio surprised them with his suggestion that both Pompey and Caesar give up their
positions. Cicero saw all this conflict and predicted the doom of the empire. Eventually, even though Caesar was liked, Pompey had his partner
recalled and was put into full power. If Caesar wanted to become consul, Pompey required that he give up his army, which Caesar did not feel safe
doing. This brought on the crucial point in history, when Caesar illegally brought his army into Italy, after crossing the Rubicon. There was no going
back after that, and the 19 year long civil war began, marking the end of the Roman

The Siege Of Alesia, By Julius Caesar Essay
The Siege of Alesia, also known by the name Battle of Alesia, led by Julius Caesar of the Roman Republic against Vercingetorix of the Gallic tribes,
was a very influential battle apart of the Gallic Wars that took place in what is known today as Alise–Sainte–Reine in France. These wars started with
the Conquest of Gaul in 52 B.C.E. by Julius Caesar, who began all of the fighting because of the threat that he had perceived from the Gallic threat to
Italy, specifically Rome. He was appointed as the governor to the Cisalpine and Transalpine Gauls with absolute authority. Over time he slowly
conquered the Gallic tribes known as the Helvetii, Belgae, and Nervii, which brought in a lot of money because of a larger amount to tax. With this
success and huge gain in money also came enemies like Marcus Porcius Cato who began campaigns to overthrow Caesar. Caesar had run into trouble
in his attempt to invade Britain, trouble being the Gauls led by Ambiorix, destroying Roman resources, about one–fourth of the Roman army, and a
fairly large amount of the food supply, causing the Romans to go into a defense mode. Because of this change into a defensive stance the Gallic tribes
noticed that they could regain independence from Rome with war, declaring Vercingetorix, a prince from the Arverni tribe from modern–day France, as
one of the army commanders for the Gallic tribes who united to defeat Caesar. Vercingetorix beat Caesar at the Batlle of Gergovia with his guerilla
warfare strategies,

Analysis Of Heyl Aphrodite
Katie Brevik, ARTH 100: Art Appreciation, Essay 2, January 15, 2016
"Male vs. Female" Not only does the ideal body image vary culture to culture, but, also, by gender. The idealized statues, Heyl Aphrodite, by an
unknown artist, from the late Hellenistic period, and Capitoline Gaul, by an unidentified artist, from 100 AD to 199 AD, differ in the sense ofgender.
The statues, Heyl Aphrodite and Capitoline Gaul, both contain human–like features, but only one shows the ideal woman figure. By observing Heyl
Aphrodite, viewers notice her soft, curvaceous figure. Her body is proportional creating balance and harmony. Fabric hugs the goddess's body,
draping over her right breast, while exposing the left, conveying a sense of sexuality. Her lack of eye contact expresses weakness, while her body
posture, with the aid of the fabric, shows movement. Merker compares the artwork in her book, when she writes, "The raised right shoulder gives a
sense of movement; although there is no torsion, one feels there ought to be and is reminded of the unstable, twisting movement of the Heyl Aphrodite
in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Unlike Heyl Aphrodite, when viewers look at the Capitoline Gaul, they notice his proportional body. The Gaul is strong, physically fit, and firm to
identify his masculinity. In comparison, Aphrodite is average and soft, not to represent her lack of exercise, but to display how an ideal woman
would appear in that time. The body of the Gaul is completely nude, not to convey a sense of sexuality, like Aphrodite, but to demonstrate power. He
lays on his fallen shield with his sword close to his right hand, as if fallen during a battle. Though he has come to defeat, DePauw University writes,
"The sculpture calls upon the viewer to witness the death of a noble warrior, and in doing so provokes us to empathize with the Gaul."2 Even with this
representation of defeat, the Gaul's stare remains

Obelix Gauls
Asterix and Obelix Make a Comeback in New Avatar!
Good news for the Asterix and Obelix fans! The two iconic Gauls have made a gala comeback after a pause following their last appearance in the
book, "Escapade in Scotland". In the new series, the pair of boisterous, indomitable Gauls is seen fighting to defend their homeland against their
Roman foes, in the newly published book, "Asterix and the Missing Scroll", which has hit the stands on 22nd October.
In the newly published book, the duo is seen taking on the Roman army let by mighty Julius Caesar along with a reporter – a character that was
portrayed in the line of the real–life WikiLeaks creator and editor in Chief, who helped them to counter the propaganda war that was launched by the

The 390 Bce Battle At The Allia River
The 390 BCE battle at the Allia River was fought between the city state of Rome and Gauls from northern Italy. When the Gauls laid siege to the
Etruscan city of Clusium, the Romans intervened on behalf of the latter. The Gauls withdrew but returned to advance on Rome itself. Close to Rome, at
the Allia River, the Roman army met the Gauls in battle but suffered a crushing defeat. PROLOGUE Between 1000–500 BCE, the gradual expansion
of Celtic tribes from central Europe transformed most of Western Europe into a Celtic world. Enticed by the riches of the Mediterranean lands, tribes
of Celts wandered into the north Italian plain where they became known as Gauls or Gallic tribes. After 400 BCE the Gauls began to take the lands
they desired by force, conquering the mosaic of cultures that lived in the Po River valley. Gallic Warriors Gallic Warriors In 391, Brennus, chief of the
Senones, led a Gallic army south into Etruria, where he besieged the town of Clusium. Clusium was part of the Etruscan civilization which flourished
to the north of the powerful city–state of Rome. The Etruscans were politically divided, however, and with no help forthcoming from the other Etruscan
cities, Clusium appealed to Rome for help. Rome then sent the Fabii, the sons of the influential patrician Fabius Ambustus, as envoys to Clusium. The
Fabii asked the Gauls, what gave them the right to invade Etruscan lands. The Gauls answered "that they carried their right in their weapons" (Livy, The
History

Military Activities In Julius Caesar Research Paper
Julius Caesar military activities were significant in Gaul, Germany and Britain, which as a result contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic.
The combined result of Rome's wars of expansion and competition among its leading men placed immense strain on the republic system. Julius
Caesar, an ambitious man, craved the need for power, which he saw Gaul as an opportunity to conquer as Gaul lacked political unity and
discipline. With the help of his devoted army and his genius with military tactics, Caesar was able to conquer Gaul with its advantages in favor for
himself, gaining popularity as well as exploring new foreign grounds where no Roman has been before. However with great power Caesar was faced
with new enemies and the challengers of Roman senate, which contributed to the fall of the Roman republic. Caesar was in search for power and
wealth and when Gaul became available to him, Caesar seized the opportunity to conquer Gaul. In 58 BC Caesar took command of Cisalpine Gaul and
Transalpine Gaul. This command... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 55BC, Caesar crossed the English Channel to Britain to punish those British tribes, which had supported his Gallic enemies. His crossing to
Britain was only an exploit and had no permanent results, but created great curiosity in Rome. Marcus Cicero wrote ' I look forward to receiving
Britannic letters from you' to a young friend who was expecting to go on the voyage. Caesar spectacular excursion into unexplored territory, capturing
the imagination of the Roman public, who "magnified it to a remarkable degree" according to Cassius Dio. There was excitement amongst the Roman
republic to hear the latest news of the campaigns, particularly the crossing to Britain. Gilliver suggest that Caesar felt confident enough to risk
gambling his political future and was ready to resort to civil war to obtain the domination he felt was due to

Interaction Between The Roman And Celtic Civilizations
Interaction between the Roman and Celtic civilizations
Between 750 BC and 12 BC the Celts were the most powerful people in Northern central Europe. The Celts consisted of a number of tribes that all
spoke a similar common language as well as sharing common elements of culture and art but were not a cohesive group like the Romans or Egyptians.
The Celts were widely spread through Europe from the British Isles to Galatia more commonly known today as Austria, Switzerland, southern France
and Spain, these areas consisted of multiple different political organisations ruled by various leaders. North west Europe was inhabited by three main
Celtic groups; The Gauls who lived in ancient France, Britons who lived in Great Britain and Gaels who lived in Ireland. The Celts were first
mentioned in Greek written sources around 500 BC when they were referred to as Keltoi. Other sources such as those of the Romans also mention the
Celtic groups for example texts from Alexander the Great. When the Romans invaded and Conquered Europe most of Celtic culture, history and
technology was destroyed, the only elements surviving were those such as their language.
Much if not all of the interaction between the Romans and Celts was based on conflict, battles and wars between the two groups occurred frequently,
generally as a result of one group wanting the others resources, land and slaves, as well as riches such as, iron, lead, zinc, copper, silver and gold.
Conflict first began between the

Short Essay: All Quiet On The Western Front
All is chaos. Horses run everywhere except where their riders are leading. Baggage animals are being toppled. Some men flee and others fight. The
disorder appears to be in no one's favor. The road is defined by sheer cliffs on both sides which man, animal, and barbarian were falling into.
Hannibal, seated atop my comrade Surus, commanded his army to stay back. Once the column was broken however, Surus, with Hannibal on his back,
ran into the fray with me at his side and scattered the enemy, as was the plan.
We have been trudging through these mountains for fifteen days now. We lost more men during this march, than we have left, and only a few of my
36 comrades that we started with remain. The men say this will be the last day of this horrendous march, which was made longer by the men's ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Then, to destroy the enemy, a detachment lead by Mago Barca comes up behind the enemy with about a thousand more infantry and a thousand more
cavalry, which crushes many of the enemy between our main infantry and our detachment. This causes many of the enemy to flee for the river. As
the disorganized men idle near or in the river, our great general on my comrades back, leads some of his men to massacre theses enemies by the river.
Forever after I will remember the site of the river running red from the blood, and the bodies floating down

Similarities And Differences Between King Henry And Julius...
4.Comparing Caesar to King Henry V
4.1 Aristocratic family backgrounds
King Henry V and Caesar share common historical grounds. As the third king in the Lancaster family line, King Henry was descendent of the old,
aristocratic Angevin dynasty which reigned in England from 1154 to 1485, beginning with King Henry II of Plantagenet. The family dynasty began in
the region of Anjou and the dynasty's expansion into Europe was considered its golden age (Vauchez, A et al. 2000:65). Similarly, Caesar too came
from an old, aristocratic family that had patrician roots. In his infamous speech made at his Aunt Julia's funeral, Caesar illustrated how the Julia gens
claimed ancestry from Aeneas, son of Aphrodite saying "...while the Julians...descend from the goddess Venus herself..." Caesars adds that his family
"...therefore hold the sanctity of kings who rule among men and of gods whole rule over kings..." (Freeman 2008:52). By both having an aristocratic
family background, there exists a commonality between the two prominent historical figures.
4.2 Military conquests ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As Julius Caesar advanced Roman influence and territory into the West through his conquests of Gaul, Spain, Africa and parts of Asia, Henry V
expanded the British empire into France. Henry's invasion of France began with the attack on the French harbour of Harfleur. The Battle of Agincourt
was the definitive battle that resulted in the Treaty of Troyes being signed on the 21st of May 1420, the effect being that Henry became the heir to the
French throne, further solidified to solidified with his marriage to Catherine of Valois, amalgamating the French and British empires ("Agincourt
600"). France proved a valuable resource to the British empire as Caesar's conquered territories were for

Julius Caesar Celtic Tribe Essay
The way the Romans interacted with the Celtic tribes to begin with was as a mediator between the tribes and also as a protector. Later they were
"peacekeepers" and finally they were rulers who conquered them but let them govern themselves and only interfered when the was talk of rebellion.
During Caesar's Conquest of Gaul, the Romans interacted with Celtic tribes as mediators, "peacekeepers", protectors, and rulers of the tribes.
Although the Romans conquered Celtic tribes, they allowed the tribes to govern themselves and only interfered when there was talk of rebellion. The
Romans would also act as a third party if there was a disagreement in a tribe and try to solve the issue diplomatically. The Romans usually tried to stop
rebellions ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One example would be that his army might be losing the fight when he is not around but when he would show up everyone would notice and fight
10 times harder than they were and somehow against all odds win the battle that they were sure to lose. Just his presence inspired confidence,
bravery, inspiration and a sense of duty therefore making his army that much stronger. He would come up with ingenious plans and would select
certain individuals that had proven themselves reliable under pressure and place them in command positions among his army to bolster the
confidence the other soldiers had or needed and when that did not work he would personally go onto the battlefield and go to where his army was
weakest and fight among his soldiers and then move on to other weak spots making his army fight that much harder. His presence was even a factor
in how his enemy would fight. Most of the time when the other army found out Caesar was present they would want to fight all the harder but logic
in the army ruled and made them with less skill and as if they didn't want to be in that fight because going against Caesar was hopeless. One time the
enemy even surrendered once they were aware of Caesar's

Druids Essay
DRUIDS
Who were the Druids?
The stereotypical image of a Druid is one of a thoughtful philosopher and magician, schooled in the lore of the traditions, and in charge of the
education of the chieftains as well as those who sought to obtain knowledge considered obscure by the rest of society. They were knowers of truth, able
to manipulate that truth as well as inform others of it. Druids not only influenced society religiously, they also influenced it socially i.e. they took on
the parts of teachers, judges, magicians, craftsmen, advisors, priests, and masters of ceremonies, and in doing so, were greatly respected in society.
The Role of Druids
Teachers
Caesar remarked that Druidism originated in Britain and that students would travel ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mistletoe is, however, very rarely found, and when found, it is gathered with great ceremony and especially on the sixth day of the moon... They
prepare a ritual sacrifice and feast under the tree, and lead up two white bulls whose horns are bound for the first time on this occasion. A priest attired
in a white vestment ascends the tree and with a golden pruning hook cuts the mistletoe which is caught in a white cloth. Then next they sacrifice the
bulls praying that the gods will make their gifts propitious to those to whom they have given it. They believe that if given in drink the mistletoe will
give fecundity to any barren animal, and that it is predominant against all poisons."
Pliny the Elder was a Roman scholar and as a result, may have been prejudiced against Celts, however not to the extent of Julius Caesar. Because this
extract was from Natural History, a writing which was produced after extensive study, this source is probably quite reliable as the aim was to provide
accurate information to the readers. Pliny also lived from AD23–AD79, a time in which the Celts also existed, increasing the reliability of this source.
Skilled Craftsmen
Druids had knowledge of bronze, iron, and other metals, which was passed on to the Celtic people.
Celtic coins often featured pictures of horses, boars and ears of wheat. Many other Celtic artefacts found in graves or bogs also feature natural motifs
of animals, people, nature and Gods. Techniques such as

Julius Caesar Essay
English II
November 30, 2011.
Julius CaesarВґs Essay Julius Caesar is mostly known for his great leadership in RomeВґs Empire, he accomplished everything he purposed and he did
whatever it took to make it happen. He had all it took to be such a leader; women were in love with him, men wanted to be part of his army and
children wanted to be like him when they grow up. For Caesar all it took was courage and selfishness to get to where he was. A leader is a person who
knows the way; goes the way and shows the way but no one will ever be a leader without courage. Courage was part of CaesarВґs being, he knew that
if he showed this part of him in the moments that seemed lost and accomplished them, people would follow him and they would ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
His craving for power was the secret ingredient for the cake he was baking. "After weeks of fighting Vercingetorix, facing starvation, is forced to
surrender" (Campbell) Weeks and weeks had to pass for someone to surrender and even though CaesarВґs men were suffering the same hunger as their
enemies Julius didnВґt even think about surrender. He just wanted to prove he was stronger than Vercingetorix was and not only some of his army
died because of starvation or simply because their bodies gave up he also left women and children die because he didnВґt let them in his shelter for
protection. But even though he left all those people dying he was still an exceptional leader. Having these two characters made Caesar a standout
in a large crowd. He had all the courage he needed to fight in a lot of battles and a hidden part of him, filled with selfishness, made him want more
the power he always wanted in whatever matters he could get there. He was well aware of everything he was doing, he planned every step of his way
and to make them happen all he needed was lots of courage and lots selfishness.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Caesar, The Early years vol. 1, ed. Horace. New York: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2005. Print

Essay about Druids and Druidism: A Study of Their Real...
When interpreting history it is almost akin to separating the wheat from the chaff in farming. Close attention has to be paid to every historical detail
that is given. In many cases when studying a historical description the reader can find a particular bias that the author has written with. The writings of
Julius Caesar and Pliny are not exempt from being written with a bias when they describe the druids. Both authors are considered to be valid sources
on historical events which make the assertions and observations that they noted more reliable than other authors. Upon a cursory observation of the text
it seems that Caesar tended to find fewer faults in the druids customs compared to Pliny. This paper will argue and prove that although... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Caesar makes no comment on this difference but instead keeps relaying the facts. Another part that ties into the religious description that Caesar gives
is the druid's rights to enact punishment. For instance, "if a private person or the public does not yield to their decision they are prohibited from
sacrifices" these people are regarded "as godless and wicked and they are cut off from all." (Caesar, 21) This shows that the druids were very
powerful not only when it came to religious matters but also matters that dealt with the public. They had the power to ostracize entire clans from the
rest of the Celts for any type of religious misconduct by a particular clan. The position of druid was coveted by the Celt people, so much so that
many men were sent by "parents and relatives" to try to become one.(Caesar, 21) This was not an easy task though. "They are said to commit to
memory a great number of verses... and remain some twenty years in training." (Caesar, 21) Part of the reason for the extensive training that went on is
that the druids refused to commit "things to writing." (Caesar, 21) One can only imagine the great mental capacity that each one of these individuals
had to have. The huge amounts of information that had to be memorized did two things for the druids. One it deterred anyone who did not really have
the

How Did Julius Caesar Impact Society
Power is a trait that many great leaders have. The rulers of the Roman empire were no exception. One of the most influential and controversial rulers
of Rome was Julius Caesar. He expanded the Roman Empire by conquering Gaul and is known for never losing a war. Julius Caesar aided the
development of the Roman Empire and its people.
In 58 B.C.E, Julius Caesar began the long process of conquering Gaul, which is modern day France and Belgium. The time when Rome was
fighting to obtain Gaul was called The Gallic Wars and lasted until 50 B.C.E. The famous book by Julius Caesar Commentarii de Bello Gallico
recounted Caesar's first hand experience in the war through battles and triumphs. Caesar sent in his legions to defeat tribes in Gaul with an
aggressive approach. The Battle of Alesia was the turning point in the conquering of Gaul in Rome's favor. Caesar used a siege tactic hoping to
starve his enemies; he carried out his plan by fortifying their city. The siege ended when the Gaul leader surrendered. Caesar used his legions and his
intelligence to conquer Gaul up to the border of the River Rhine, expanding the ever growing Roman Empire. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
One of the ways he did this was by starting major building projects like the construction of the Forum Julium which was used to provide more space
for law courts. Projects like these produced more jobs which the plebeian class desperately needed. During his time as a consul Caesar also passed a
law to redistribute the land to the plebeians and another act that made it so if you had a farm в…“ of your workers must be Roman citizens. Caesar
helped to reduce the employment issue among the plebeian

The Battle Of The Roman Empire By Caesar 's Commentarii De...
In the unrelenting expansion of the Roman Empire, Caesar's Commentarii de Bello Gallico accounts the engagements of the Gallic Wars, alongside
his personal intrigue of Gallic people. Yet, this work makes use of and conveys anthropological reports of a people approaching subjugation by Rome,
the Gauls. Furthermore, Asad's "Introduction; Barlow's "Noble Gauls and their other in Caesar 's Propaganda"; G. Boys–Stones' "The Recovery of
Primitive Wisdom in Early Stoicism; Feuchtwang's "The Colonial Formation of British Social Anthropology"; and C. Kraus, "Bellum Gallcium," attests
to the pedagogical function of such work. Therefore, I contend the Bellum Gallicum, presents as a didactic textвЂ•in regards to Caesar, who propels the
Stoic theory of cultural maturation, informed by the pseudo–scientific principles of earlier philosophers, namely, Posidonius and Seneca the Younger.
In addition, Caesar exploits the primal nature of Roman subjects to further both his and Rome 's agenda. Thereby, formulating a handbook, intended to
instruct future administrators in conquering, governing, and accordingly, in empire building.
1) JC 's characterization of the Gallic "character" and their knowledge of the things of culture, e.g. battle tactics, writing, trade
Caesar, during his office as proconsul of Gaul, authored the Bellum Gallicum, in avoidance of his aristocratic enemies and their persecution; in effort
to gain the support of the plebeians, this work was relayed directly to the Roman

Gaul: The Battle Of Bibracte
What is now modern day France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Germany, and Italy was once known as one place by the name of Gaul. Gaul
was made up of land from all over. Its land limits in the north and the west were the Atlantic Ocean, the east's were the Rhine River and the Alps, and
the south's limits were the Po Valley, the Mediterranean Sea and the Pyrenees. This area was known as Transalpine Gaul. The name "Gaul" dates
back to the 8th century and corresponds to a military and cultural area that was founded on a familiar religion as well as independent states. In 1st and
2nd century AD, Gaul made most of its money by exporting wine, food, and pottery. This was not the case in 3rd century AD, when Gaul was suffered
from multiple... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Roman army and six legions were led into Gaul in 58 BC. The Gallic people had asked for Julius Caesar's help in defending their land because
the Suebi threatened to invade them. Caesar strategically placed his men in a way where they were likely to defeat their enemy. Ariovistus, leader
of the Suebi, had escaped back over the Rhine river and never crossed it again. Caesar then proceeded to secure his German border. This battle
either wounded or killed approximately 6,000 Roman men and 35,000 Suebi men. The Battle of Sabis River was fought in 57 BC. Julius Caesar
attacked the land of the Belgic tribes, which was led by Galba. Bibrax, a Gallic city, was attacked by Belgae while Caesar was off setting up camp.
Belgae then decided to attack Caesar at his camp site, the Aisne River. The two enemies fought and many Belgic tribes surrendered. The Nervii were
the strongest warriors until they were attacked and surrendered to two Roman legions. Orders were sent out for tribes to stay within the areas of their
land. Within the tribes, there was a total of approximately 60,000

Role Of Julius Caesar In The Gaul
Julius Caesar's role in the Gaul had a large impact in many aspects of his career such as the military, wealth and influence on Rome and political
power. Julius Caesar was a Roman politician who turned the Roman republic into the powerful Roman Empire. Caesar overthrew the Roman
republic and founded the rule of the emperors. In this period Caesar used the problems to his advantage and created his own supreme political and
military power, gaining the trust of Rome and building his army. Caesar is well known throughout the whole world as one of the most powerful and
successful leaders that has ever lived. In his young years, his father had a major impact on him, as he had political success, and the family has a
history in politics, which had helped Caesar in starting out in politics. Julius Caesar's first important political success had occurred in 63b.c.e when
Caesar was appointed the role of Chief Religious office in Rome; this had set him up for future political roles. Caesar was very strategically and had
many tactics to how he would rule; he always wanted more glory and political and military opportunities and would overcome all challenges he
faced. In 59B.C.E Caesar won an election to become consul, the senate then assigned him to lands that gave Caesar no opportunities for military
exaltation, as he did not want Caesar to succeed. Caesar realised he would need more allies to overcome his opponents in the senate. He then formed
the alliance that was known as the 'First Triumvirate' with the Roman General Pompey who brought wealth and military success. During Caesar's rule
he gained a lot of military success due to how he led his army
Military during Caesar's rule was a high contribution of his success. Military success was important to Julius Caesar as it gave him wealth to
succeed in Roman politics. It was important was important for Caesar because it gives him enormous power in the military; this means his army
would be big and strong and would be able to protect Caesar. Success in a war gave Caesar more glory and brought more wealth to him, and made
Caesar rise more to fame. In Rome political success brought opportunities for military command, as Julius Caesar already had much political power, his

The Conquest Of Gaul Sparknotes
Allison McNeese
Origins of the Western Tradition
04/24/2016
Amy McGlynn
Book Review: Julius Caesar's "The Conquest of Gaul"
[underline or italicize titles of books]
Between the years 58 B.C.E and 50 B.C.E., Gaius Julius Caesar conquered almost the whole of France as well as Belgium, Switzerland and parts of
Germany; he also found time to invade Britain twice. Julius Caesar was a Roman statesman and general who played a critical role in the demise of the
Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. He amassed great power through clever political alliances and military victories. Caesar recorded
his conquests in great detail which provides valuable historical text to refer to; however it must be kept in mind that it is a clear piece of propaganda.
As the saying goes, the winner gets to write history. Nonetheless, Caesar's writings are a unique firsthand source on his conquests in Gaul and the
various Gallic tribes he came up against.
Central themes evident in his memoir are war, devotion and persuasion. Caesar was clear to outline in his commentaries how each of his campaigns
was in the best interest of the republic. He depicted himself as a loyal servant to the Roman people and therefore portrayed his actions and decisions
in the most favorable way possible. Those who would have read his work at the time would have felt inspired and consequently considered him a
hero. Caesar's books were intended to aid future historians in telling his story accurately and [in a way

Similarities Between Paris And Gauls
Both Paris which is the capital city of France and Barcelona which is the capital and the most famous town of Catalonia have similarities with their
rebellious history and their historic revolution. The similarities are reflected on the grounds of the cause for rebellion and the phases they underwent
during the revolution period . The associated similarities for resistance in both cities were economic problems and the cultural differences of the
population in the towns. Both financial issues and cultural differences influenced the residents to need for the insurgency. On the side of the revolution,
it encompassed a social and political change in both cities1. The essay focuses on the historical rebellion similarities between Paris and Barcelona.
From the general view of the history of Paris, the city is believed to be over 2000 years of age. During the period between 250 and 200 BC, the
tribe Gauls of Parisii settled in the town. The general population of Gauls was financially unstable and had different cultural practices. During the
early Middle Ages of 52BC Julius Caesar conquered Paris and made it the regional existence of Romans. The emergence of the Romans and the
preexistence of the Gauls widened the disputes cultural Gaps . The general population of both the Romans and the Gauls was vibrant and defiant
which made them a free cooperative under the authority of Etienne Marcel who was their chief leader. The raging of the Bastille in 1789 was the first
of a progression

Julius Caesar And The Gallic War Summary
One of the first wars Julius Caesar encountered was the Gallic War. The city of Gaul was rising just like Rome. However, one day German troops
took back their land forcing one Gaul tribe to retreat back their main city. To do this they would have to cross some Roman territory. Gaul thought that
this wouldn't be a problem as they thought of Romans as understanding people. Julius Caesar soon learned about the Gaul tribe's plans and took an
army to the area in which the Gaul tribe would be crossing. Gaul sent two of their leaders and discuss their problem. The Gaul leaders then left to
find out what date they wanted to cross. In that time Julius Caesar wanted to show how much force the Roman army had. He ordered his troops to
build a wall across the point in which Gaul wanted to cross. The leaders soon came back and were astonished by the Roman army's creation. When
Julius Caesar and Gaul leaders met this time Julius Caesar said that he wouldn't allow them to cross. Gaul was not about to give up so easily, from
then on they began to check for weak spots in the Roman's defenses. The Gaul tribe finally gave up as they knew that there were not any weak spots.
Gaul decided that they would take a more dangerous route. They would travel through a narrow valley even though enemy could attack from above.
Julius Caesar learned of Gauls new plans and was fearful. He thought that if Gaul went back to its main city it would hold a grudge against Rome and
come to destroy them. So Julius

The Downfall Of Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar was and still is considered to be one of the greatest military generals in history. His combination of leadership skills, military genius,
and speaking ability propelled him to the forefront of Roman society. Born on June 12/13 100 B.C., Caesar was born into an ancient aristocratic
family. Around the age of 16 after his father had died, Caesar had joined the military. It was apparent from this time onward that Caesar was
especially gifted in the arts of strategy and warfare. By the age of 30 Caesar had begun making political strides in his perpetual quest for glory and
prominence. During this time he would work closely with his friend and future mortal enemy, Pompey. In the next ten years, Caesar would become
governor of Spain and ascend to the position of consul. His partnership with Marcus Licinius Crassus further increased Caesar's rise to power, as
Crassus himself was a powerful politician and general, who was arguably the wealthiest man in all of Rome. Along with Pompey, the three men
formed what came to be known as the First Triumvirate. Although Caesar was aligned with Pompey, he never ceased to find ways outmaneuver him,
qualities that would eventually precipitate Rome's civil war. Continuing his military conquests, Caesar would become the governor of Gaul, which is
now modern day Belgium and France. After ascending to this position, he'd engage in a near decade–long conquest of Gaul known as the Gallic War.
Probably his most successful battle and

How Did Caesar's Military Activities Affect The Roman...
Julius Caesar's military activities in Gaul, Germany and Britain impacted the Roman Republic greatly. Caesar was a man of ambition as Mommsen
wrote that "Caesar's aim was the highest which a man is allowed to propose himself" and through his expansion of Rome he was not quiet in
involving himself in the story. By providing for himself and boosting his legacy throughout the campaigns he also gave great benefits to Rome. The
two military activities notably Gaul and Germany brought in luscious wealth for the Roman Republic. This success was enough to gain solid control
over the new provinces. Although this solid control only lasted for a limited time and showed who was capable of leading. It was the Britain campaign
that sought a different impact... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Off the back of successful expeditions in Gaul and Germany Rome was hopeful for more. Cicero notes, "There was a quick realisation in Rome
that campaigns in Britain were not going to yield the eagerly anticipated profits." From this there is a shift in the impact for the Roman Republic.
The physical benefits may have not been present but there were still profits of sorts. Plutarch, believed that "the Romans had not gained much in
terms of wealth from the expeditions ". Caesar had been the first to explore and again through his writings he let Rome know about it to keep hopes
high. These benefits for Rome included the expansion and connection to a new area of Britain and they certainly recognised Caesar after this.
Goldsworthy affirms this "the expeditions to Britain brought Caesar huge and highly favourable public attention." The Britain campaign was a
different impact for Rome; lacking of gold, it defined a new political power and his rise in popularity. Follow this Goldsworthy refer to "An annual
report was sent to the Senate and this was widely circulated." Caesar's name was a growing impact for the Roman's, more so than the physical benefits
received from the former military

Leadership and Julius Caesar
As Warren Bennis, Founding Chairman of The Leadership Institute at the University of Southern California, once said, "Leadership is the capacity
to translate vision into reality." This can be interpreted to mean that one can be classified as a leader if he or she can put a plan into action. A leader
is often like a visionary, and forward thinkers are needed in society. A visionary has a vivid imagination who makes dreams come true. They provide a
backbone in society, helping to plan what is to come in the future that would be most beneficial. Without a leader that has the qualities of a visionary, no
civilization has a bright future. Julius Caesar, Roman general–turned–ruler, was a historical visionary who fit Warren Bennis' description of a leader.
Possibly one of the most well–known Roman figures, Caesar extensively pushed Rome to one of its best eras, despite Caesar himself having a bit of a
dark side. Even though Caesar seized power in the Roman Empire and named himself "Dictator For Life," Julius Caesar was a great leader. He helped
to expand the empire into France, as well as glorifying Rome through architectural projects and reforms. Overall, ?
Julius Caesar's exceptional leadership skills begin with his victories in the Gallic Wars. The Gallic Wars were battles inGaul with Caesar and his men
fighting various rebelling Gallic tribes. These Gallic rebellions were caused by a population boom within the tribes of Gaul, causing them to leak into
Roman territory (Gallic

The Emporer Caesar Essay
The Emporer Caesar
The Emperor Julius Caesar is perhaps most famous as the first Roman Emperor to convert to Christianity. His rise from a humble birth as a peasant boy
to Emperor is a tale of bravery, adversity and ultimately triumph through faith.
Julius Caesar was born as Groyxo Gaul in 54BC into an immigrant family in the back streets of Rome. Neither parent was rich. The German historian
Guildo Horn noted: "Seine Mutter war ein Hamster und sein Vater, der von den Holunderbeeren gerochen wurde." They were as flotsam and jetsam on
the beach. His early years would probably have been spent scavenging on the streets, though this is not certain. Later historians, like Plato re–wrote the
histories once he became Emperor as ignoble ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Shark!" and pointed out of the tent. While Asterix was distracted he swapped the treaties. Asterix didn't notice till two months later that he had
accidentally signed the 'surrender' rather than the 'victory' document. He only realised when a day–trip, which he was told was to see a flock of
interesting pigeons, turned out to be a trick. He was in fact thrown to the Christians in the Coliseum. Aristotle says he died with a smile on his face,
appreciating the practical joke. Julius Caesar was so successful with this trick he played it again and again. The whole of France was captured
without a single drop of blood being spilt. To celebrate he changed France's name to Gaul, after himself. But then he was worried people might think
him egotistical, and so this was when he changed his own name to Caesar, because he had 'Seized' Gaul.
Emboldened by his successes in France which he moved on to Britannia. By now his shark trick was famous and he had to bring along a larger tent to
accommodate the audiences that would gather to see it happen. Sadly they were disappointed in Britain.
Unfortunately for Caesar the British didn't know what a shark was, so instead of staring out of the tent, they just stared at his finger. Caesar tried a few
times to solve the problem by bringing along a dictionary with him to explain, but the British couldn't read Latin. In one last attempt in 23BC Caesar
brought along a dictionary in English to negotiate with the

The Origins Of France: The New Stone Age
Catherine McManus 10/9/14 Senior Religion
The origin of France dates back to the first evidence of ancestors of humans 2 million year ago. Theses beings were called homo erectus, meaning "to
put up" or "set up right". Cavemen, known as Neanderthals, showed up in about 100,000 BC. Humans as we know them today, however, were not
evident in prehistoric France, known as Gaul, until about 40,000 years ago. This archaic time in Gaul is separated into three different time periods
by historians: The Old Stone Age, the New Stone Age, and the Age of Metal. The Old Stone Age was from the earliest times or existence to about
6000 BC. During this time animals, and primitive humans got food from plants. During the New Stone Age, lasting from about 6000 to 1800 BC,
people began the use of polish stone tools. There was a transition from hunting and gathering to farming. Thus instead of roaming around for food,
humans began to settle across Gaul for residence. The Age of Metal started in approximately 1800 BC and ended in 700 BC. During this time period,
metalworking began and became a prominent part of Gaulish life. (B2, W1) ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Celtic Gaul took up much of western Europe. "Celts" was a term used to describe several races, languages, and tribes. It was used by Greeks and
Romans y referring to the people inhabiting Gaul. Celts were the most well–known race in Europe because of the large evidence they left of their
existence, and because of their dominance throughout Europe. This race, as early as the 10th Century BC crossed the English channel to invade
Britain. Because Celts were so well known, Romans began look to where they were settled. In 390 BC, Celts caused Roman to defend themselves
after they took over and burnt their enemy's capital city of Rome.

What Four Qualities Should Be Chosen For This War?
I think that I have given quite enough words, to explain why this war is inevitable given its kind, perilous given its scope: there remains, it seems, that
one must speak about the general who must be chosen for this war, and who must be put in charge of such great matters.
If only, true Romans, you had such a great abundance of strong and virtuous men, that this choice would be difficult for you, over who you think is to
be put in charge of such great matters and such a great war! But as it is, indeed, Gnaeus Pompeius alone is the one who has surpassed in excellence not
only the glory of these men, who are now living, but also the recorded achievement of past generations, which thing is it that can make anyone's mind
doubtful in this matter?
I, for my part, think that in the perfect general these four qualities should be present: knowledge of military matters, overall excellence, authority, good
fortune. In that case, who has ever been, or ever should be, more knowledgable than this man?
He who departed from school and from the lessons of boyhood to his fathers army, an into the discipline of warfare, during a major war against the
fiercest enemies; he who at the end of boyhood was a soldier in the army of a perfect general, who at the onset of adolescence was himself a general
of a perfect army; he who has clashed with the enemy more often than anyone else has argued with their rival, who has waged more wars than the rest
have read of, held more offices than others

How Did The Romans Introduce Their Culture
1A To conquer "is to defeat someone or something, usually with force, like army troops that conquer enemy territory" (Vocabulary.com). This is exactly
what happened to the Gaul by the Romans. The Romans conquered their region, influenced the Gaul and imported their culture. They even built
mirroring cities in the Roman Gaul to further emulate the Roman culture. Once the Romans had conquered the Gaul they initially tried to take away
their religion from them. Augustus (27 BCE to 14CE) "forbade the druidic religion for Roman citizens" (Tarpenning). Many of the Gaul had to become
Roman citizens so ultimately this law forced them into revoking their previous religion. Tiberius (CE 14–27) "issued a decree against the druids and
related diviners and healers" (Tarpenning). Emperor Tiberius put up a ban against the religion and of any practisers of the religion.... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The Latin language took over the Gaul language of before. Latin was the language taught to many in writing but a mixture of the Gaul language and
Latin was taught as a way of oral communication especially among the elite. Over a period of time the mixture of Gaul and Latin combination of
language died out for a more formal Latin tongue. Although the emperors tried to outlaw the Gaul's religion what had happened was a hybrid of
religions is what formed. "There were strong efforts to assimilate earlier beliefs within the accepted framework" (Tarpenning). Even though the Romans
had tried to forbid the druidic religion, the Gaullist elite wouldn't be able to just get of their beliefs so they tried to assimilate within the accepted
framework from the Romans. Romans imported their wealth into the new conquered region. Their wealth went into building better infrastructure,
building better roads having a military presence and the overall safety of internal and external

Amphitheatre Of The Three Gauls Research Paper
Amphitheatre of the Three Gauls
The Amphitheatre of the Three Gauls is a famous sanctuary which was dedicated to the cult of Augustus and Rome. It was celebrated by many Gallic
tribes who had gathered at Lugdunum, the Roman name of the region of Lyon in ancient times. There are many things to do inFrance as a tourist which
must include seeing all the designated historical monuments such as the Amphitheatre of the Three Gauls. The amphitheatre was built at the foot of a
hill which was then placed at a point where the two rives of the Rhone and Saone met. A recent find in 1957 allowed the origins of this place to be
confirmed as the part of the sanctuary of Rome and Augustus. The recent find dates the building to around 19 AD. The Amphitheatre

Why Is Julius Caesar Successful
"I came, I saw, I conquered." A quote by Julius Caesar that he lived his life by. One major thing Julius Caesar is known for is his great success in
the battle of Gaul. The battle of Gaul was a huge impact in Julius Caesar's rise as a leader of the Roman Empire. In the beginning, he set out with
strategic plans to overtake Gaul and its many tribes in order to prove to Rome the kind of powerful man he greatly wanted to achieve. Unfortunately,
with too much power comes jealousy. Most battles start because one country wants to take of another country for their resources, population, or even
architect. However, the battle of Gaul started in a different way. A way that had made it become so popular.Julius Caesar had been a ruler of Rome for
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 57 BC, Caesar and his men set out to conquer Gaul. He took around 40,000 soldiers with him (Strauss). They traveled by foot for nearly three
days. Most men carried 50 pounds or more of supplies on their backs. The soldiers settled alongside the river Sameria. In the first year of the war,
the Romans had everything going their way. Then the second year came, and more tribes of Gaul realized that Caesar was not a friend but an enemy.
The Belgians were the first to confront Caesar's army (Strauss). Caesar was ready for them and defeated the Belgians. Different tribes of Gaul joined
forces to defeat the Romans. Caesar's army prepared to fight against the Nervian–led forces near the River Selle. The Nervians were ready to attack as
the Romans reached their camp. With Caesar's first legions, or group of soldiers, defeated, the Nervians thought the Roman army would withdraw
(Strauss). The Romans however did not withdraw and battles continues between the two armies. The Nervians outsmarted and did a surprise attack.
The Roman army was much larger than they expected. The Nervians made a mistake,which led to the Romans ability to regroup and attack back.
According the Caesar's Commentaries, the key to winning the battle of Gaul was three things: the skill of his army, the generals of his army, and most
important the greatness of himself. Other battles followed like the

Personal Narrative: The Statue Of The Dying Gaul
Not but a moment ago I possessed the power to deal death at will. But at present I find myself limp on the battle field unable to gain standing, let
alone continue the fight. Over a lifetime I have honed hard body and hard mind. An entire life in or preparing for battle. And in battle I was
proficient and deadly but my body has served its purpose and I can now taste the final moments of this life. It tastes of dirt and blood. I shall rest
where I have laid so many foe. I entered this world covered in the blood of another and I find solace in leaving the same. I chose this statue based on
the fact it was commissioned by the victor and yet it shows a great deal of respect to the fallen army. The statue of the Dying Gaul, shows a man in his

Battle Of Alesia Research Paper
Alesia was ancient town located on top of mont auxois. Originally the capital of the Mandubii, one of the Gallic tribes. But that all changed on
September 52 BC when Caesar conquered Alesia. today Alesia is known as Alise–Sainte–Reine in Burgundy, France where they have the Vercingetorix
memorial.
The Battle Of Alesia
Vercingetorix and his men took refuge in Alesia and a few days later they would send out letters to help his allies. Caesar decided to starve
Vercingetorix and them surrender since he knew that the food supply wouldn't last long because of the population of Alesia and the 80,000. Caesar
ordered his men to construct a 12 feet high and 11 miles long wall around the town to enclose it. Caesar knew that an offensive attack on Alesia
wouldn't work well since his army was about 50,00 while Vercingetorix had 80,000 infantry and 12,000 cavalries. If Vercingetorix wanted his men to
get past the Roman wall, first they would come an upon ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And don't forget the belt of scattered camouflaged pits with sharpened poles lay between all the trenches and if anyone did get past all that they'd find
themselves facing a 12 feet wall with projecting stakes. In late September, the expected relief army of Gauls arrived, commanded by Commius of the
Atrebates and Vercassivellaunos of the Averni. When they arrived they saw another wall around the wall that was enclosing Alesia. On 2 October,
Vercassivellaunos attacked the weak spot (which was a steep hill that the Romans could not build through) in the Roman outer wall, with Vercingetorix
attacking the inner wall. Caesar realized the attack would be difficult to beat off and

Julius Caesar As A Source Criticism
In this essay I will be describing, discussing and evaluating my chosen source. I will be using the references that I have chosen, in order to present a
clear and concise source criticism, coming to a well rounded conclusion at the end.
The source is taken from the book 'Commentarii de Bello Gallico', which was written and edited by Aulus Hiritus and Julius Caesar and was published
around 58 – 49 BC, sometime after Julius Caesars death. It is a secondary source which describes Julius Caesar's first–hand account of the nine–year
period that he spent fighting the Celtic and Germanic people in Gaul. The book was written in order to inform the Roman people of the Gallic Wars
from a source that they trusted, however it is biased meaning that Caesar may have had particular motives for writing it thus meaning that the content
may also be influenced by Caesars motives. Caesars chronology of 'Commentarii de Bello Gallico' allows for him to react to the shifts in Rome's
political climate (Timothy, R. Kimbrough, 2014, p. 3), which means that the source I have chosen to critique was written to suit Caesars immediate
needs (G. Woolf, 2011, p.54), suggesting that the portrayal of joy that Caesar has been bestowed with could be exaggerated in order to fit the political
climate in Rome, allowing him to maintain his position within the Senate and with the Roman population. The book contains information on the Gallic
Wars and its purpose is to persuade the Roman people that Caesars appointment in Gaul and his actions during the Wars occurred in order to benefit the
Roman state and the Roman people, regardless of the legality with which they were brought about (Timothy. R. Kimbrough, 2014, p.8).
However, the source also suggests that Caesar was popular and was a worthy figure head for the Roman Empire because he was prepared to face the
unknown (H. Schadee, 2008, p.170), presenting the his readers that he was then welcomed by the towns and their people connotes that he was
expressing his influence and power outside of Rome. The meaning of this source is that Caesar is attempting to exert his reputation and power over the
Senate by recounting his actions during the Wars as for the benefit of the Roman empire, to the

Analysis Of Julius Caesar 's ' The Gallic War '
Critique Essay In this critique of Julius Caesar's book, The Gallic War, I will be discussing the purpose and accuracy (or in this case, inaccuracy) over
his adventures and military campaign against the Gallic tribes. There is a constant debate between historians: The Myth of Certainty. History is all
about interpretation and finding truth out of subjectivity. History can often be lost in time as the firsthand accounts will eventually fade out. Even if
firsthand accounts remains intact, it is not completely objective. Every person has their own agenda and is biased in one shape or form, no matter how
much they try not to be; Julius Caesar is not an exception. I will start this critique by stating the author's main purpose for writing his book. Secondly
I will attempt to decipher the accuracy and inconsistency of Julius Caesar's account. Finally, I will express my opinion over his commentaries over
the Gallic War. There were many reasons to why Julius Caesar wrote his book over the Gallic War. One of these reasons was to help inspire the people
of Rome. Rome had just been sacked by the Gaul, creating tension between the Roman people and the Celtic tribes. The growing resentment towards
the Gallic people spread like wildfire as political turmoil rise. Although the Romans were very tenacious and persevering, this did not stop the morale
blow that many Romans felt.
Another reason for the commentaries was to justify Caesar's invasion. The number one goal for any war is to

Dying Gaul In Ancient Greek Art
Ancient Greece is famous for its cultural advances, particularly the art. Hellenistic is the last phase of Ancient Greek art, and is essential for the
evolution of western art. The Dying Gaul is a typical example of Hellenistic sculptures, dated 230–220 BCE. We are unsure of who made it, but
Epigonos – the court sculptor of Attalid Dynasty – was believed to be the one. The Dying Gaul was made to celebrate King Attalos I of Pergamon in
his victory over Gauls (Galatians). The Gauls were brutal soldiers that fought in the nude. They were so fierce that they believed in nature defense and
refused to wear armors and clothes during a battle. The bushy hair, the mustache and the torc (necklace) are barbarian characteristics; they are symbols
of their

Julius Caesar War Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Traci Webb

More from Traci Webb (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Julius Caesar War Essay