SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 128
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair
National Poll, April #2, 2011
ICPSR 33962
CBS News
60 Minutes
Vanity Fair
Codebook
Inter-university Consortium for
Political and Social Research
P.O. Box 1248
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
www.icpsr.umich.edu
Terms of Use
The terms of use for this study can be found at:
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/33962/term
s
Information about Copyrighted Content
Some instruments administered as part of this study may contain
in whole or substantially
in part contents from copyrighted instruments. Reproductions of
the instruments are
provided as documentation for the analysis of the data
associated with this collection.
Restrictions on "fair use" apply to all copyrighted content. More
information about the
reproduction of copyrighted works by educators and librarians
is available from the United
States Copyright Office.
NOTICE
WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS
The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States
Code) governs the making
of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material.
Under certain conditions
specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to
furnish a photocopy or other
reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the
photocopy or reproduction is
not to be "used for any purpose other than private study,
scholarship, or research." If a
user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or
reproduction for purposes in
excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright
infringement.
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/33962/term
s
ICPSR PROCESSING NOTES FOR # 33962
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Survey, April #2,
2011
1) Undocumented Variables: No information was provided for
variables COVR, KAPP,
BTCH, FLIP, FLP2, FLP3, and FLP4.
Data Completeness Report
Notes: (1) Variables are individually listed only if they have
greater than 5% missing data. These variables are listed under
the appropriate percentage category in the order in which they
appear in the data file. (2) The Data Completeness Report
only captures information about system missing or other values
that are declared missing. Codes that have a label implying
that they are missing but that are not declared missing values
are not reflected in this report. Data users should consult the
codebook for more specific information about missing values.
(3) Some variables that have 100% missing data may have
been blanked by ICPSR to protect respondent confidentiality.
Data users should consult the codebook for more specific
information about blanked variables. (4) Data do not contain
skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as
coded.
Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing
Values
Percent of Cases with
Missing Values
Variable Name and Label
(Total Cases = 848 )
have 0% Missing Values( 78 of 98 variables)79.6%
have 0% - 1% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0%
have 1% - 3% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0%
have 3% - 5% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0%
have 5% - 10% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0%
have 10% - 20% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0%
have 20% - 40% Missing Values( 4 of 98 variables)4.1%
23.9%Congressional DistrictCD
23.9%urbanityURBN
23.9%msc codeMSC
23.9%Number of female adultsFEMM
have 40% - 99% Missing Values( 16 of 98 variables)16.3%
47.4%Opinion Barack ObamaQ4
47.4%Opinion Michelle ObamaQ5
47.4%Opinion PawlentyQ6
47.4%Opinion PalinQ7
47.4%Opinion TrumpQ8
52.6%Opinion re Barack ObamaQ10
52.6%Opinion re Michelle ObamaQ11
52.6%Opinion re PawlentyQ12
52.6%Opinion re PalinQ13
52.6%Opinion re TrumpQ14
55.5%Family appreciates as motherQ34
76.9%Friend/Relative Died Sept 11 AttackQ54
70.5%Choose NomineeQ55
84.2%Post Grad DegreePEDU
83.7%Income Over 250KI250
87.1%number other phonesNPH0
have 100% missing values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0%
- i -
- ICPSR 33962 -
ICPSR 33962
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, April #2, 2011
Variable Description and Frequencies
Note: Frequencies displayed for the variables are not weighted.
They are purely descriptive and may not be representative of the
study population. Please review any sampling or weighting
information available with the study.
Summary statistics (minimum, maximum, mean, median, and
standard deviation) may not be available for every variable in
the codebook. Conversely, a listing of frequencies in table
format
may not be present for every variable in the codebook either.
However, all variables in the dataset are present and display
sufficient information about each variable. These decisions are
made intentionally and are at the discretion of the archive
producing this codebook.
- 1 -
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, April #2, 2011
caseidCASEID
1-5 (width: 5; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
caseidQuestion:
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
Day of SurveyDYOF
6-6 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Day of SurveyQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
21.5 %182First1
25.8 %219Second2
21.3 %181Third3
31.4 %266Fourth4
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.63
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.14
Day of WeekDAYS
7-7 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Day of WeekQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
31.4 %266Sunday1
20.2 %171Thursday5
27.1 %230Friday6
21.3 %181Saturday7
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 4.44
• Median: 5.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
- 2 -
- Study 33962 -
• Maximum: 7.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.42
Respondent's SexSEX
8-8 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Respondent's SexQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
40.7 %345Male1
59.3 %503Female2
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.59
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.49
Interviewer's SexSINT
9-9 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Interviewer's SexQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
40.2 %341Male1
59.8 %507Female2
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.60
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.49
Interviewer's RaceRINT
10-10 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Interviewer's RaceQuestion:
- 3 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
50.2 %426Caucasian1
27.5 %233African-American2
1.8 %15Hispanic/Other3
20.5 %174DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.95
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.11
Congressional DistrictCD
11-12 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Congressional DistrictQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
0.8 %70
5.1 %431
2.2 %192
3.2 %273
2.4 %204
0.9 %85
1.9 %166
1.8 %157
0.9 %88
1.2 %109
1.3 %1110
2.2 %1911
0.8 %712
2.0 %1713
0.7 %614
0.7 %615
0.9 %816
2.0 %1717
1.4 %1218
1.7 %1419
1.5 %1320
- 4 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
0.1 %121
0.5 %422
2.2 %1923
1.9 %1624
0.6 %525
0.8 %727
0.1 %128
0.6 %529
0.5 %430
0.6 %532
0.7 %633
0.9 %834
1.3 %1135
0.2 %236
0.5 %437
0.4 %338
1.8 %1539
0.8 %740
1.1 %941
0.6 %542
0.2 %243
0.4 %344
0.2 %245
0.1 %146
0.2 %247
0.6 %548
0.2 %249
0.5 %450
0.7 %651
0.9 %852
0.9 %853
0.4 %354
0.7 %655
0.6 %556
1.3 %1157
0.6 %558
0.9 %859
0.9 %860
0.4 %361
1.2 %1062
- 5 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
0.8 %763
0.4 %364
0.1 %165
1.1 %966
0.9 %867
0.1 %168
0.7 %669
1.2 %1070
0.8 %771
0.7 %673
0.2 %274
0.8 %775
0.4 %377
0.1 %178
0.4 %379
0.2 %281
0.6 %582
0.1 %184
0.4 %386
0.2 %287
0.4 %388
0.1 %189
0.2 %290
0.2 %291
0.5 %493
0.1 %196
0.4 %398
23.9 %203. (M)
Based upon 645 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 31.36
• Median: 23.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 98.00
• Standard Deviation: 26.14
census regionCENR
13-13 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
- 6 -
- Study 33962 -
census regionQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
21.1 %179NorthEast1
23.3 %198NorthCentral2
35.4 %300South3
20.2 %171West4
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.55
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.04
cbs regionCBSR
14-14 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
cbs regionQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
23.0 %195NorthEast1
23.3 %198NorthCentral2
33.5 %284South3
20.2 %171West4
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.51
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.06
state codeSTCD
15-16 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
state codeQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
1.8 %15Alabama1
- 7 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
0.4 %3Alaska2
1.3 %11Arizona3
1.1 %9Arkansas4
8.8 %75California5
1.5 %13Colorado6
1.3 %11Connecticut7
0.6 %5District of Columbia9
5.1 %43Florida10
3.4 %29Georgia11
0.7 %6Idaho13
2.9 %25Illinois14
2.7 %23Indiana15
0.8 %7Iowa16
1.1 %9Kansas17
1.9 %16Kentucky18
1.5 %13Louisiana19
1.3 %11Maine20
0.9 %8Maryland21
1.8 %15Massachusetts22
3.3 %28Michigan23
2.4 %20Minnesota24
0.4 %3Mississippi25
1.5 %13Missouri26
0.9 %8Montana27
0.7 %6Nebraska28
0.8 %7Nevada29
0.5 %4New Hampshire30
3.3 %28New Jersey31
0.4 %3New Mexico32
6.8 %58New York33
3.1 %26North Carolina34
0.2 %2North Dakota35
4.8 %41Ohio36
1.4 %12Oklahoma37
2.6 %22Oregon38
4.6 %39Pennsylvania39
0.2 %2Rhode Island40
1.9 %16South Carolina41
0.5 %4South Dakota42
2.5 %21Tennessee43
- 8 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
6.2 %53Texas44
0.9 %8Utah45
0.5 %4Vermont46
3.9 %33Virginia47
1.7 %14Washington48
0.5 %4West Virginia49
2.5 %21Wisconsin50
0.1 %1Wyoming51
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 26.25
• Median: 28.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 51.00
• Standard Deviation: 14.74
urbanityURBN
17-17 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
urbanityQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
6.8 %58Large central city (over 500k)1
14.0 %119Central city (50 to 500k)2
32.8 %278Suburbs3
22.4 %190Rural5
23.9 %203-. (M)
Based upon 645 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.22
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.29
msc codeMSC
18-18 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
- 9 -
- Study 33962 -
msc codeQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
20.9 %177Central city of multi-county SMSA1
13.9 %118Not in central city, but in county containing all/part
of the central
city
2
18.6 %158Suburban county of the SMSA3
3.4 %29In an SMSA consisting of just one county4
19.2 %163Not in an SMSA5
23.9 %203-. (M)
Based upon 645 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.82
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.52
Time Zone CodesTZC
19-19 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Time Zone CodesQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
50.9 %432Eastern1
28.8 %244Central2
5.5 %47Mountain3
13.9 %118Pacific4
0.8 %7Bering5
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.85
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.08
Adults in householdADLT
20-20 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
- 10 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
35.0 %2971
48.0 %4072
11.1 %943
4.4 %374
0.9 %85
0.2 %26
0.2 %28
0.1 %19
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.91
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.95
Number of female adultsFEMM
21-21 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Number of WomenQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
9.8 %83-0
57.5 %488-1
8.0 %68-2
0.7 %6-3
23.9 %203-. (M)
Based upon 645 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.00
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 3.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.52
First Dial ResultFDIA
22-22 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
- 11 -
- Study 33962 -
First Dial ResultQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
0.7 %6Not in service - Disconnected - Nonworking -0
75.1 %637Someone answers speaking English1
9.9 %84No answer2
4.8 %41Busy3
0.1 %1Business or other non-residence i.e. computer line5
9.3 %79Mechanical answering machine9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.94
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.33
Number of DialingsFCLL
23-23 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Number of DialingsQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
63.4 %5381
30.2 %2562
4.5 %383
0.9 %84
0.5 %45
0.2 %26
0.1 %17
0.1 %19
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.47
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.78
Cover SheetCOVR
- 12 -
- Study 33962 -
24-24 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
15.7 %1331
16.7 %1422
17.0 %1443
17.7 %1504
15.9 %1355
17.0 %1446
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.52
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 6.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.69
Was Ever AppointmentKAPP
25-25 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Was Ever AppointmentQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
10.1 %86Yes1
89.9 %762No2
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.90
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.30
2-Way Rotation VariableFLIP
26-26 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
2-Way Rotation VariableQuestion:
- 13 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
52.6 %4461
47.4 %4022
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.47
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.50
4-Way RotationFLP2
27-27 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
4-Way RotationQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
24.3 %2061
24.9 %2112
24.3 %2063
26.5 %2254
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.53
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13
4-way Rotation/Selection VariableFLP3
28-28 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
4-way Rotation/Selection VariableQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
24.8 %2101
26.3 %2232
24.2 %2053
24.8 %2104
- 14 -
- Study 33962 -
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.49
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 4.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.11
3-Way RotationFLP4
29-29 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
3-Way RotationQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
32.9 %2791
32.4 %2752
34.7 %2943
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.02
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.82
ReplicateBTCH
30-31 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
1.1 %91
1.7 %142
1.7 %143
1.3 %114
1.1 %95
1.2 %106
1.5 %137
1.2 %108
1.1 %99
1.4 %1210
2.0 %1711
- 15 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
1.3 %1112
0.9 %813
1.9 %1614
1.2 %1015
2.1 %1816
1.8 %1517
0.9 %818
1.1 %919
1.9 %1620
0.8 %721
7.3 %6222
6.2 %5323
5.2 %4424
6.2 %5325
5.9 %5026
1.7 %1427
1.3 %1128
1.1 %929
2.4 %2030
1.2 %1031
1.5 %1332
1.3 %1133
1.9 %1634
0.8 %735
1.7 %1436
1.1 %937
1.7 %1438
0.9 %839
1.3 %1140
1.4 %1241
1.1 %942
1.4 %1243
1.2 %1044
1.1 %945
1.7 %1446
1.1 %947
1.9 %1648
0.6 %549
1.2 %1050
1.1 %951
- 16 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
Value
0.9 %852
1.3 %1153
2.1 %1854
1.2 %1055
1.3 %1156
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 27.05
• Median: 25.00
• Mode: 22.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 56.00
• Standard Deviation: 14.07
OversampleOSMP
32-32 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
OversampleQuestion:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
76.1 %645RDD1
23.9 %203Cell Phone Sample9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.92
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.42
Final WeightWGHT
33-39 (width: 7; decimal: 3)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Final WeightQuestion:
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.000
• Minimum: 0.119
• Maximum: 14.583
• Standard Deviation: 0.976
- 17 -
- Study 33962 -
Obama Job ApprovalQ1
40-40 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is
handling his job as president?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
45.5 %386Approve1
45.3 %384Disapprove2
9.2 %78DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.19
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.22
Right Direction/Wrong TrackQ2
41-41 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Do you feel things in this country are generally going in the
right direction or do you feel things have
pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
25.8 %219Right direction1
66.5 %564Wrong track2
7.7 %65DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.28
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.99
Opinion Barack ObamaQ4
42-42 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
- 18 -
- Study 33962 -
Is your opinion of Barack Obama favorable, not favorable,
undecided, or haven't you heard enough
about Barack Obama yet to have an opinion?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
21.3 %181Favorable1
20.9 %177Not favorable2
8.0 %68Undecided3
1.2 %10Haven't heard enough4
1.2 %10Refused5
47.4 %402-. (M)
Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.86
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.91
Opinion Michelle ObamaQ5
43-43 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Is your opinion of Michelle Obama favorable, not favorable,
undecided, or haven't you heard enough
about Michelle Obama yet to have an opinion?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
25.4 %215Favorable1
7.3 %62Not favorable2
7.2 %61Undecided3
11.8 %100Haven't heard enough4
0.9 %8Refused5
47.4 %402-. (M)
Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.16
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.29
Opinion PawlentyQ6
- 19 -
- Study 33962 -
44-44 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Is your opinion of Tim Pawlenty (Paw-LEN-ty) favorable, not
favorable, undecided, or haven't you
heard enough about Tim Pawlenty (Paw-LEN-ty) yet to have an
opinion?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
2.8 %24Favorable1
5.7 %48Not favorable2
6.5 %55Undecided3
37.1 %315Haven't heard enough4
0.5 %4Refused5
47.4 %402-. (M)
Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.51
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.90
Opinion PalinQ7
45-45 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Is your opinion of Sarah Palin favorable, not favorable,
undecided, or haven't you heard enough
about Sarah Palin yet to have an opinion?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
11.0 %93Favorable1
27.9 %237Not favorable2
9.4 %80Undecided3
4.0 %34Haven't heard enough4
0.2 %2Refused5
47.4 %402-. (M)
Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.14
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
- 20 -
- Study 33962 -
• Standard Deviation: 0.85
Opinion TrumpQ8
46-46 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Is your opinion of Donald Trump favorable, not favorable,
undecided, or haven't you heard enough
about Donald Trump yet to have an opinion?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
9.0 %76Favorable1
29.5 %250Not favorable2
9.8 %83Undecided3
4.2 %36Haven't heard enough4
0.1 %1Refused5
47.4 %402-. (M)
Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.18
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.82
Opinion re Barack ObamaQ10
47-47 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
We'd like to get your opinion of some people in the news. For
each of the following people, please
say whether your opinion is favorable, not favorable, undecided,
or whether you haven't heard enough
Question:
about him or her yet to have an opinion. Barack Obama? ([IF
NECESSARY, READ:] Is your opinion
of Barack Obama favorable, not favorable, undecided, or
haven't you heard enough about Barack
Obama yet to have an opinion?)
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
21.9 %186Favorable1
18.2 %154Not favorable2
5.1 %43Undecided3
1.8 %15Haven't heard enough4
0.5 %4Refused5
52.6 %446-. (M)
Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
- 21 -
- Study 33962 -
• Mean: 1.75
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.86
Opinion re Michelle ObamaQ11
48-48 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Michelle Obama? ([IF NECESSARY, READ:] Is your opinion
of Michelle Obama favorable, not
favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about
Michelle Obama yet to have an opinion?)
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
26.2 %222Favorable1
8.1 %69Not favorable2
6.2 %53Undecided3
6.4 %54Haven't heard enough4
0.5 %4Refused5
52.6 %446-. (M)
Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.88
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.14
Opinion re PawlentyQ12
49-49 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Tim Pawlenty (Paw-LEN-ty)? ([IF NECESSARY, READ:] Is
your opinion of Tim Pawlenty favorable,
not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about
Tim Pawlenty yet to have an opinion?)
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
2.6 %22Favorable1
3.5 %30Not favorable2
6.0 %51Undecided3
35.1 %298Haven't heard enough4
- 22 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
0.1 %1Refused5
52.6 %446-. (M)
Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.56
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.85
Opinion re PalinQ13
50-50 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Sarah Palin? ([IF NECESSARY, READ:] Is your opinion of
Sarah Palin favorable, not favorable,
undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Sarah Palin yet to
have an opinion?)
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
11.0 %93Favorable1
26.1 %221Not favorable2
7.5 %64Undecided3
2.6 %22Haven't heard enough4
0.2 %2Refused5
52.6 %446-. (M)
Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.05
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.81
Opinion re TrumpQ14
51-51 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Donald Trump? ([IF NECESSARY, READ:] Is your opinion of
Donald Trump favorable, not favorable,
undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Donald Trump
yet to have an opinion?)
Question:
- 23 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
9.2 %78Favorable1
28.5 %242Not favorable2
7.1 %60Undecided3
2.5 %21Haven't heard enough4
0.1 %1Refused5
52.6 %446-. (M)
Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.07
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.76
U.S. Troops in AfghanistanQ15
52-52 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
How much longer do you think large numbers of U.S. troops
will have to remain in Afghanistan--less
than a year, one to two years, two to five years or longer than
five years?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
14.2 %120Less than a year1
22.2 %188One to two years2
27.4 %232Two to five years3
19.1 %162Longer than five years4
3.8 %32As long as it takes (Vol.)5
4.8 %41Should leave now (Vol.)6
8.6 %73Don't know/No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.42
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.12
Gas price increase effectQ16
53-53 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
- 24 -
- Study 33962 -
Have recent price increases in gasoline caused any financial
hardship for you or others in your
household, or not? [IF YES, ASK:] Has that been a serious
hardship, or not serious?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
42.0 %356Yes, serious1
32.1 %272Yes, not serious2
25.6 %217No3
0.4 %3DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.86
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.91
Gas price futureQ17
54-54 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
In the next few months, do you expect that the price of gasoline
will go up, stay the same, or go
down?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
76.2 %646Go up1
9.3 %79Stay the same2
9.7 %82Go down3
4.8 %41DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.67
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.77
Change vacation plansQ18
55-55 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Do you expect to change your vacation plans this summer
because of the cost of gasoline?Question:
- 25 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
43.0 %365Yes1
53.7 %455No2
3.3 %28DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.80
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.42
Steps for gas priceQ19
56-57 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Have you taken any specific steps to help deal with the higher
price of gas? [IF YES, ASK:] What is
the most significant step you have taken?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
30.0 %254Driving less1
3.8 %32Carpooling2
2.0 %17Public transportation3
1.4 %12Riding a bike4
1.7 %14Walking5
2.4 %20Cheaper gas6
5.3 %45Fuel efficient car7
2.8 %24Cut other expenses8
5.1 %43Cut back travel plans9
0.4 %3Work from home10
0.6 %5Extra job11
1.4 %12Stay homr12
39.7 %337No, nothing97
2.4 %20Other98
1.2 %10DK/NA99
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 44.07
• Median: 9.00
• Mode: 97.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 99.00
- 26 -
- Study 33962 -
• Standard Deviation: 46.43
3-Way Abortion ChoiceQ20
58-58 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Which of these comes closest to your view? Abortion should be
generally available to those who
want it, abortion should be available but under stricter limits
than it is now, or abortion should not be
permitted?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
39.5 %335Generally available1
34.3 %291Available but limits2
22.5 %191Should not be permitted3
3.7 %31Don't know/No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.09
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.55
Opinion OprahQ21
59-59 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Is your opinion of Oprah Winfrey favorable, not favorable,
undecided, or haven't you heard enough
about Oprah Winfrey yet to have an opinion?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
52.4 %444Favorable1
15.8 %134Not favorable2
21.3 %181Undecided3
7.9 %67Haven't heard enough4
2.6 %22Refused5
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.93
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13
- 27 -
- Study 33962 -
Opinion Prince CharlesQ22
60-60 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
We'd like to get your overall opinion of some members of the
British royal family. For each of the
following people please say whether your opinion is favorable,
not favorable, undecided, or whether
you haven't heard enough about him or her yet to have an
opinion. How about Prince Charles?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
27.4 %232Favorable1
25.8 %219Not favorable2
21.5 %182Undecided3
20.8 %176Haven't heard enough4
4.6 %39Refused5
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.49
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.22
Opinion Lady CamillaQ23
61-61 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
How about Prince Charles' wife Camilla?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
13.6 %115Favorable1
28.5 %242Not favorable2
19.3 %164Undecided3
34.8 %295Haven't heard enough4
3.8 %32Refused5
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.87
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 5.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.14
- 28 -
- Study 33962 -
Rate personal happinessQ24
62-62 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Generally speaking, how happy would you say you are--very
happy, fairly happy, or not too happy?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
46.8 %397Very happy1
44.2 %375Fairly happy2
8.0 %68Not too happy3
0.9 %8DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.68
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.95
Happiness factorQ25
63-63 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
If you had to say, which one of the following things do you
think is most important in determining how
happy you are in life. 1. A rewarding career, 2. Being close with
your family, 3. Having good health,
4. Having a lot of money, or 5. The area where you live?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
3.9 %33Career1
55.1 %467Family2
30.3 %257Health3
2.2 %19Money4
5.2 %44Where you live5
3.3 %28DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.70
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.43
Decor satisfactionQ28
- 29 -
- Study 33962 -
64-64 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
How satisfied are you with the decor and furniture in the main
living areas of your home, very satisfied,
somewhat satisfied, not very satisfied, or not satisfied at all?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
51.5 %437Very satisfied1
38.2 %324Somewhat satisfied2
5.9 %50Not very satisfied3
3.5 %30Not at all satisfied4
0.8 %7DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.67
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.01
Spending on decorQ29
65-65 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Compared to five years ago, are you currently spending more
money, spending less money or
spending about the same amount of money as you did five years
ago on furniture and home
decoration?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
20.8 %176More1
45.2 %383Less2
31.4 %266Same3
2.7 %23DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.30
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.33
Positive Thinking Affect LifeQ30
66-66 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
- 30 -
- Study 33962 -
numericVariable Type:
In general, would you say thinking positively can make your
life better, or does thinking positively
not have much of an affect on how your life turns out?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
87.1 %739Can make like better1
10.0 %85No effect2
0.2 %2Worse (vol.)3
2.6 %22DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.31
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.29
Positive Thinking Affect JobQ31
67-67 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
When it comes to getting a job if you are out of work, would
you say thinking positively can help a
lot, help a little, or won't it have any effect?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
69.8 %592A lot1
14.5 %123A little2
10.8 %92No effect3
4.8 %41DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.75
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.77
Positive Thinking Affect IllnessQ32
68-68 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
When it comes to overcoming a serious illness, would you say
thinking positively can help a lot, help
a little, or won't it have any effect?
Question:
- 31 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
76.7 %650A lot1
15.6 %132A little2
5.5 %47No effect3
2.2 %19DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.45
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.27
Being a motherQ33
69-69 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Compared to when you were a child, in general, do you think
being a mother today is harder, easier,
or about the same?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
74.1 %628Harder1
7.1 %60Easier2
15.3 %130Same3
3.5 %30DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.66
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.59
kidsKIDS
70-70 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Do you have any children? [IF YES, ASK:] Are any of your
children under 18?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
23.2 %197Yes, under 181
49.8 %422Yes, over 182
- 32 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
26.7 %226No3
0.4 %3DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.06
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.82
Family appreciates as motherQ34
71-71 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Do you feel your family appreciates you enough as a mother, or
do they not appreciate you enough?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
38.6 %327Yes, enough1
4.7 %40No, not enough2
1.2 %10DK/NA9
55.5 %471-. (M)
Based upon 377 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.32
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.31
Economic Dichotomy WideningQ35
72-72 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
These days, do you feel that the rich are getting richer and
everyone else is getting poorer, or is that
not the case?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
65.9 %559Rich getting richer1
27.7 %235Not the case2
6.4 %54DK/NA9
- 33 -
- Study 33962 -
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.79
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.93
Memorial Day WeekendQ36
73-74 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
What do you, personally, plan to do on the Memorial Day
weekend and holiday?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
10.8 %92Stay home1
18.9 %160Family get-together2
9.2 %78Cookout3
5.4 %46Work4
3.8 %32Travel5
2.4 %20Camping6
0.8 %7Fishing7
4.2 %36Visit Gravesite8
3.9 %33Local event9
0.1 %1Home improvements10
0.4 %3Household chores11
1.3 %11Yard work12
0.2 %2Graduation parties13
0.5 %4Birthday party14
0.6 %5Religious observance15
1.4 %12Beach16
0.2 %2Golf17
0.4 %3Watch sports18
0.1 %1Watch TV19
24.9 %211Nothing97
2.4 %20Other98
8.1 %69DK/NA99
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 37.30
• Median: 6.00
• Mode: 97.00
- 34 -
- Study 33962 -
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 99.00
• Standard Deviation: 44.69
See Blockbuster Movie This SummerQ37
75-75 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
How likely are you to go out and see one of the blockbuster
movies expected to be released this
summer -- very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely, or not
at all likely?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
17.0 %144Very likely1
18.4 %156Somewhat likely2
22.6 %192Not very likely3
40.8 %346Not at all likely4
1.2 %10Don't know/No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.96
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.30
Movies Now vs 10 Yrs AgoQ38
76-76 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Compared to 10 years ago, do you think the blockbuster movies
that are released in the summer
are better now, worse now, or about the same as they were 10
years ago?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
14.2 %120Better1
29.8 %253Worse2
36.8 %312Same3
19.2 %163Don't know/No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.57
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
- 35 -
- Study 33962 -
• Standard Deviation: 2.73
Detainees held in US prisonQ39
77-77 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Do you think detainees from the prison in Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba can be safely held in federal
maximum security prisons in the U.S., or don't you think they
can be held safely in maximum security
prisons in the U.S.?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
47.9 %406Yes, can be held safely in U.S. prisons1
35.8 %304No, cannot be held safely in U.S. prisons2
16.3 %138DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.66
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.83
Trump wealth realityQ40
78-78 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Do you think Donald Trump is as wealthy as he seems to be? 1.
Yes, he's everything he says he is,
or 2. No, his wealth is a comb-over.
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
42.1 %357Yes, he's everything he says he is1
39.2 %332No, his wealth is a comb-over2
18.8 %159DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.89
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.97
Civil war reasonQ41
79-79 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
- 36 -
- Study 33962 -
numericVariable Type:
This year marks the 150th anniversary of the American Civil
War. Why do you think that war was
fought -- was it mainly about slavery or mainly about states'
rights?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
39.0 %331Slavery1
48.9 %415States' rights2
12.0 %102DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.45
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.47
Live the longestQ42
80-80 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Which one of the following people do you think will live the
longest? 1. Charlie Sheen, 2. Lindsay
Lohan, or 3.Keith Richards?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
12.4 %105Charlie Sheen1
21.0 %178Lindsay Lohan2
32.1 %272Keith Richards3
34.6 %293DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 4.62
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 9.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.25
Prosecuting athletesQ43
81-81 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
It cost the U.S. government more than $6 million to try former
Major League baseball player Barry
Bonds. Do you think prosecuting athletes for cheating -- or
lying about their cheating -- is a waste of
money or money well spent?
Question:
- 37 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
68.4 %580A waste of money1
25.0 %212Money well spent2
6.6 %56DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.78
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.97
Islam peaceful religionQ44
82-82 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Compared to most other religions, do you think Islam is a more
peaceful religion, a less peaceful
religion, or do you think Islam is about as peaceful as most
other religions?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
2.5 %21More1
35.5 %301Less2
45.4 %385About the same3
16.6 %141DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.59
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.47
Buy popular electronic productsQ45
83-83 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Are you among the first people you know to buy a new popular
electronic product, like an iPad or
smartphone, or are you more likely to wait for an updated, less
expensive version of the product to
come out, or do you generally not buy new popular electronic
products?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
8.6 %73Among first I know to buy1
- 38 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
34.8 %295Wait for a updated/less expensive version2
55.3 %469Don't buy new/hot electronics3
1.3 %11DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.56
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.98
Definition T-M-ZQ46
84-84 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
What is T-M-Z? Is it 1. A jaw disorder, 2. A celebrity website
and TV show, 3. A text message acronym
the kids are using, or 4. A recreational drug?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
1.7 %14A jaw disorder1
51.4 %436A celebrity news website/show2
5.1 %43A text message acronym the kids are using3
2.7 %23A recreational drug4
39.2 %332DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 4.83
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.37
Without air travel/internetQ47
85-85 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
If you had to choose, would it be easier for you to live without
air travel or the internet?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
59.9 %508Air travel1
30.3 %257Internet2
- 39 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
9.8 %83DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.09
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.32
Opinion broken heart painQ48
86-86 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Recent studies suggest that the pain of a broken heart can be
equivalent to physical pain. Do you
agree or disagree?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
83.6 %709Yes, agree1
12.9 %109No, disagree2
3.5 %30DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.41
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.49
Lied about ageQ49
87-87 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Have you ever lied about your age? [IF YES, ASK:] Have you
lied to give the impression you are
younger than you really are, older than you really are, or have
you done both?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
5.7 %48Yes, younger than I am1
8.0 %68Yes, older than I am2
9.9 %84Yes, both3
75.9 %644No, haven't lied about my age4
0.5 %4DK/NA9
- 40 -
- Study 33962 -
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.59
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.94
Graffiti Legitimate ArtQ50
88-88 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Do you consider graffiti to be a legitimate art form like painting
or sculpture, or not?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
30.8 %261Yes1
62.1 %527No2
7.1 %60Don't know/No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.19
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.93
Attend religious servicesQ51
89-89 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Would you say you attend religious services every week, almost
every week, once or twice a month,
a few times a year, or never?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
27.2 %231Every week1
12.1 %103Almost every week2
10.8 %92Once or twice a month3
25.5 %216A few times a year4
23.2 %197Never5
1.1 %9Don't know/No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
- 41 -
- Study 33962 -
• Mean: 3.12
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.66
Tea Party SupporterQ52
90-90 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Do you consider yourself to be a supporter of the Tea Party
movement, or not?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
23.8 %202Yes1
67.2 %570No2
9.0 %76DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.39
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.12
Registered VoterREG
91-91 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
These last questions are for background only. Some people are
registered to vote and others are
not. Are you registered to vote in the precinct or election
district where you now live, or aren't you?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
86.8 %736Yes1
13.0 %110No2
0.2 %2DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.15
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.51
- 42 -
- Study 33962 -
Know of Sept 11 DeathQ53
92-92 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Do you or any of your friends know someone who was killed in
the September 11th terrorist attack?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
23.1 %196Yes1
75.8 %643No2
1.1 %9DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.84
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.85
Friend/Relative Died Sept 11 AttackQ54
93-93 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Did you personally have a close friend or relative who was
killed in the Sept. 11th terrorist attack?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
5.7 %48Yes1
17.5 %148No2
76.9 %652-. (M)
Based upon 196 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.76
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 2.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.43
EvangelicalEVAN
94-94 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Some people think of themselves as evangelical or born again
Christians. Do you ever think of
yourself in either of these ways?
Question:
- 43 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
25.8 %219Yes1
72.8 %617No2
1.4 %12DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.84
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.96
ReligionRELI
95-95 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
What is your religious preference today?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
55.3 %469Protestant (Please specify denomination)1
19.9 %169Catholic2
1.7 %14Jewish3
0.4 %3Muslim4
6.8 %58Other (Specify)5
12.5 %106None6
3.4 %29Don't know/ No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.42
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.17
Marital statusMARR
96-96 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Are you now married, widowed, divorced, separated, or have
you never been married?Question:
- 44 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
51.1 %433Married1
13.4 %114Widowed2
14.2 %120Divorced3
2.4 %20Separated4
18.6 %158Never been married5
0.4 %3DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.26
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.59
Party IDPRTY
97-97 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Generally speaking, do you usually consider yourself a
Republican, a Democrat, an Independent,
or what? ?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
29.5 %250Republican1
34.9 %296Democrat2
27.6 %234Independent3
8.0 %68Don't know/No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.54
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.05
Choose NomineeQ55
98-98 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
- 45 -
- Study 33962 -
Thinking about the Republican party's nominee for President in
2012... if you had to choose, which
is more important to you -- having a Republican nominee who
agrees with your positions on most
issues, or having a nominee with the best chance of defeating
Barack Obama in November?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
16.7 %142Agrees with issues1
10.7 %91Win in November2
2.0 %17Don't know/No answer9
70.5 %598-. (M)
Based upon 250 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.91
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.98
political philosophyPPHL
99-99 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
How would you describe your views on most political matters?
Generally do you think of yourself as
liberal, moderate, or conservative?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
22.5 %191Liberal1
36.3 %308Moderate2
34.3 %291Conservative3
6.8 %58DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.60
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.89
actual ageAGE
100-101 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
How old are you?Question:
- 46 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
1.2 %10-18
0.7 %6-19
0.9 %8-20
1.7 %14-21
0.7 %6-22
1.4 %12-23
0.2 %2-24
1.1 %9-25
0.9 %8-26
0.4 %3-27
1.1 %9-28
0.9 %8-29
1.5 %13-30
1.4 %12-31
1.3 %11-32
0.6 %5-33
0.5 %4-34
0.5 %4-35
0.8 %7-36
0.5 %4-37
0.7 %6-38
1.4 %12-39
1.5 %13-40
1.7 %14-41
1.8 %15-42
0.9 %8-43
1.3 %11-44
0.9 %8-45
1.8 %15-46
1.9 %16-47
0.7 %6-48
1.9 %16-49
1.9 %16-50
1.4 %12-51
2.6 %22-52
1.8 %15-53
1.7 %14-54
2.2 %19-55
2.2 %19-56
1.8 %15-57
- 47 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
1.9 %16-58
2.4 %20-59
1.8 %15-60
1.7 %14-61
2.9 %25-62
1.3 %11-63
2.5 %21-64
2.2 %19-65
1.4 %12-66
1.3 %11-67
2.2 %19-68
1.9 %16-69
2.0 %17-70
1.1 %9-71
0.9 %8-72
1.5 %13-73
1.4 %12-74
1.2 %10-75
0.9 %8-76
1.8 %15-77
1.2 %10-78
1.7 %14-79
0.9 %8-80
0.4 %3-81
1.4 %12-82
1.4 %12-83
0.7 %6-84
0.8 %7-85
0.6 %5-86
0.6 %5-87
0.2 %2-88
0.1 %1-89
0.2 %2-90
0.1 %1-92
0.2 %2-93
0.2 %2-94
0.1 %1-96
4.4 %37Refused99
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
- 48 -
- Study 33962 -
• Mean: 56.72
• Median: 57.00
• Mode: 99.00
• Minimum: 18.00
• Maximum: 99.00
• Standard Deviation: 20.03
age groupAGEA
102-102 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Are you between 18 and 29, 30 and 44, 45 and 64, or are you
over 64?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
11.3 %96Between 18 and 291
17.0 %144Between 30 and 442
38.6 %327Between 45 and 643
32.2 %273Over 644
0.9 %8Refused9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.98
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.13
18 to 29 in HouseAGEC
103-103 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
How many people living in this household are 18 to 29 years of
age? Be sure to include yourself.Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
78.7 %667None0
11.0 %93-1
6.7 %57-2
1.4 %12-3
1.2 %10Four or more adults 18-29 years old4
1.1 %9DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 0.43
- 49 -
- Study 33962 -
• Median: 0.00
• Mode: 0.00
• Minimum: 0.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.17
educationEDUC
104-104 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
What was the last grade in school you completed?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
9.1 %77Not a High School grad1
25.5 %216High School grad2
29.0 %246Some college (trade or business)3
20.2 %171College grad4
15.8 %134Post grad work or degree (Masters, MBA, JD, MD,
PhD)5
0.5 %4Refused9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.11
• Median: 3.00
• Mode: 3.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.27
Post Grad DegreePEDU
105-105 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Did you complete the degree?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
13.1 %111Yes1
2.7 %23No2
84.2 %714-. (M)
Based upon 134 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.17
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
- 50 -
- Study 33962 -
• Maximum: 2.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.38
HispanicHISP
106-106 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Are you of Hispanic origin or descent, or not?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
5.2 %44Hispanic1
93.6 %794Not Hispanic2
1.2 %10Don't know/ No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.03
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.79
raceRACE
107-107 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Are you White, Black, Asian, or some other race?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
82.0 %695White or Caucasian1
9.6 %81Black or African-American2
1.9 %16Asian3
4.2 %36Other(Specify)4
2.4 %20Refused9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.45
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.36
Standard IncomeINCA
- 51 -
- Study 33962 -
108-108 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Was your total family income in the year 2010 UNDER or
OVER $50,000?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
10.5 %89Under $15,0001
15.1 %128$15,000 - $30,0002
16.0 %136$30,000 - $50,0003
22.5 %191$50,000-$75,0004
26.9 %228Over $75,0005
9.0 %76Won't specify/Refused9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 3.94
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 5.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.05
NYTimesIncomeINCN
109-109 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Was your total family income in the year 2010 UNDER or
OVER $50,000? Was it under $15,000,
between $15,000 and $30,000, or between $30,000 and $50,000?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
10.5 %89Under $15,0001
15.1 %128$15,000 - $30,0002
16.0 %136$30,000 - $50,0003
22.5 %191$50,000-$75,0004
10.6 %90$75,000-$100,0005
16.3 %138Over $100,0006
9.0 %76Won't specify/Refused9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 4.10
• Median: 4.00
• Mode: 4.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 2.17
- 52 -
- Study 33962 -
Income Over 250KI250
110-110 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
.Range of Missing Values (M):
Was it over $250,000, or not?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
3.2 %27Yes, over $250,0001
12.6 %107No2
0.5 %4DK/NA9
83.7 %710-. (M)
Based upon 138 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.01
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.28
Home Phone ServicePSRV
111-111 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
What type of telephone service is there in your home that you
could use or be reached on? Is there
both regular land line and cell phone service, or only regular
land line service, or only cell phone
service?
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
67.3 %571Both regular and cell1
19.7 %167Regular only2
12.0 %102Cell only3
0.9 %8DK/NA9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.51
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 1.01
other phones?NPH
112-112 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
- 53 -
- Study 33962 -
numericVariable Type:
Are there any other telephone numbers in your home that I
could have dialed and reached you on
-- I don't mean extensions, but different telephone numbers? [IF
NECESSARY SAY:] We need to
know how hard or easy it is to reach people.
Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
12.9 %109Yes1
86.2 %731No2
0.9 %8Don't know/No answer9
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.94
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 2.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.77
number other phonesNPH0
113-113 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Now I dialed you at [#PHONE NUMBER], how many other
numbers are there in your home?Question:
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
8.1 %69-1
1.7 %14-2
0.6 %5-3
2.5 %21Refused9
87.1 %739-. (M)
Based upon 109 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 2.76
• Median: 1.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 9.00
• Standard Deviation: 3.10
Call Back WillingnessNM
114-114 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
numericVariable Type:
Would you be willing to have a reporter call you back in a few
days to discuss your views further?Question:
- 54 -
- Study 33962 -
%Unweighted
Frequency
LabelValue
41.7 %354Willing, talkative1
25.0 %212Willing, not talkative2
33.3 %282Not willing3
Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
• Mean: 1.92
• Median: 2.00
• Mode: 1.00
• Minimum: 1.00
• Maximum: 3.00
• Standard Deviation: 0.86
- 55 -
- Study 33962 -
ICPSR APPENDIX FOR # 33962
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, April #2, 2011
The codes listed in the appendix provide the complete listing of
states (including the District of
Columbia) composing the CBS Region and Census Region
variables (CBSR and CENR,
respectively, in the codebook), as well as the state codes
composing the CBS State Codes
variable (STCD in the codebook).
CBS Region Codes
Northeast: Northcentral:
Connecticut Illinois
Delaware Indiana
District of Columbia Iowa
Maine Kansas
Maryland Michigan
Massachusetts Minnesota
New Hampshire Missouri
New Jersey Nebraska
New York North Dakota
Pennsylvania Ohio
Rhode Island South Dakota
Vermont Wisconsin
West Virginia
South: West:
Alabama Alaska
Arkansas Arizona
Florida California
Georgia Colorado
Kentucky Hawaii
Louisiana Idaho
Mississippi Montana
North Carolina Nevada
Oklahoma New Mexico
South Carolina Oregon
Tennessee Utah
Texas Washington
Virginia Wyoming
Census Region Codes
Census region codes parallel CBS region codes with one
exception: Delaware, District of
Columbia, Maryland, and West Virginia are coded as South, not
Northeast.
CBS News State Code List
01. Alabama 27. Montana
02. Alaska 28. Nebraska
03. Arizona 29. Nevada
04. Arkansas 30. New Hampshire
05. California 31. New Jersey
06. Colorado 32. New Mexico
07. Connecticut 33. New York
08. Delaware 34. North Carolina
09. District of Columbia 35. North Dakota
10. Florida 36. Ohio
11. Georgia 37. Oklahoma
12. Hawaii 38. Oregon
13. Idaho 39. Pennsylvania
14. Illinois 40. Rhode Island
15. Indiana 41. South Carolina
16. Iowa 42. South Dakota
17. Kansas 43. Tennessee
18. Kentucky 44. Texas
19. Louisiana 45. Utah
20. Maine 46. Vermont
21. Maryland 47. Virginia
22. Massachusetts 48. Washington
23. Michigan 49. West Virginia
24. Minnesota 50. Wisconsin
25. Mississippi 51. Wyoming
26. Missouri
ICPSR 33962Terms of UseICPSR Processing NotesData
Completeness ReportICPSR Variable Description and
Frequencies AppendixCBS News and Census Region CodesCBS
News State Codes
Guidelines for Data Analysis Paper
This detailed outline should assist you in writing your data
analysis paper. It is not necessary that you stick to this outline
exactly but use it as a guide. Each of the areas should be
addressed, but depending on the topic, some papers will
necessitate spending more time in some areas rather than others.
You are graded on the following:
Grammar
Is the paper well written and free of errors?
Is the paper properly cited?
Completeness
Did you review 5 relevant articles?
Did you discuss all areas listed below?
Understanding Results
Do you understand the output from SPSS?
Did you use the most relevant statistical test for your data?
Did you explain your results?
1. Describe what the topic is and why it is interesting and
worthy of research (approx. 1 page)
This is done in the introduction and the beginning paragraphs of
your paper. Your hypothesis should concern an interesting and
important question.
a. Explain why this is an important topic, one worth studying.
b. Do this in your introduction to catch your reader’s attention.
2. Review the relevant literature (approx 2-3 pages)
Once you have compiled 5 articles, create a summary of what
others have found about your question. These sources should be
scholarly in nature, from books and academic journals.
“Scholarly” excludes newspaper articles, magazine articles, and
websites. These can be used, but they are extra sources.
a. Demonstrate your familiarity and knowledge of other
important studies that inform your research question.
b. Compare and contrast theoretical approaches for explaining
your particular research question.
c. If relevant, discuss how others have defined variables of
interest.
3. Research Methods (approx. 3-4 pages)
a. Identify and explain your research question and
hypothesis
1. Spell out the particular research question that guides your
study.
2. Identify the hypothesis that enables you to answer your
research question,
and be sure to specify both your independent and dependent
variables.
3. Explain how you will measure your variables: Provide
operational definitions for your IV, DV and control
variables.
4. Discuss the reliability and validity of your measures.
b. Data
Explain what specific data collection technique or
techniques was used to carry out your research. Most of you
will use one of the survey provided but you must also
consider the following:
What other method could you use? Are there any better
ones?
Discuss the sample in the survey (in the codebook)
Specify the questions used (in the codebook)
Identify your unit of analysis (i.e. who or what should be
observed, surveyed, interviewed, etc)
If necessary, discuss any particular problems with the
sample.
4. Results (approx 2 pages, tables do not count)
Run the appropriate statistics and present the results in a way
that makes sense. You must include relevant tables from SPSS.
You must explain the results. If they are not as you would
expect, state why that might be and offer an alternative
explanation/hypothesis.
5. List of Sources (last page)
Make sure you have a works cited list and properly cite these
sources throughout the paper. If you do not properly cite you
will end up with a failing grade.

More Related Content

Similar to CBS/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll April 2011

Criminal Justice Statistics Lab 4CRJS-3020-01 Points 30A
Criminal Justice Statistics Lab 4CRJS-3020-01  Points 30ACriminal Justice Statistics Lab 4CRJS-3020-01  Points 30A
Criminal Justice Statistics Lab 4CRJS-3020-01 Points 30ACruzIbarra161
 
1. How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity 3
1.  How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity  31.  How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity  3
1. How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity 3AbbyWhyte974
 
1. How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity 3
1.  How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity  31.  How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity  3
1. How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity 3MartineMccracken314
 
Aries systems eemug 2021 manuscript eval services panel sci score v2_edits
Aries systems eemug 2021 manuscript eval services panel sci score v2_editsAries systems eemug 2021 manuscript eval services panel sci score v2_edits
Aries systems eemug 2021 manuscript eval services panel sci score v2_editsAnita Bandrowski
 
Farid Ali Presentation_Final.pptx
Farid Ali Presentation_Final.pptxFarid Ali Presentation_Final.pptx
Farid Ali Presentation_Final.pptxFaridAliMousa1
 
Robust biomarker selection from RT-qPCR data using statistical consensus crit...
Robust biomarker selection from RT-qPCR data using statistical consensus crit...Robust biomarker selection from RT-qPCR data using statistical consensus crit...
Robust biomarker selection from RT-qPCR data using statistical consensus crit...Roger Alexander
 
FAIR as a Working Principle for Cancer Genomic Data
FAIR as a Working Principle for Cancer Genomic DataFAIR as a Working Principle for Cancer Genomic Data
FAIR as a Working Principle for Cancer Genomic DataIan Fore
 
Analyzing Road Side Breath Test Data with WEKA
Analyzing Road Side Breath Test Data with WEKAAnalyzing Road Side Breath Test Data with WEKA
Analyzing Road Side Breath Test Data with WEKAYogesh Shinde
 
High Sensitivity Sanger Sequencing for Minor Variant Detection
High Sensitivity Sanger Sequencing for Minor Variant DetectionHigh Sensitivity Sanger Sequencing for Minor Variant Detection
High Sensitivity Sanger Sequencing for Minor Variant DetectionThermo Fisher Scientific
 
CINECA webinar slides: Modular and reproducible workflows for federated molec...
CINECA webinar slides: Modular and reproducible workflows for federated molec...CINECA webinar slides: Modular and reproducible workflows for federated molec...
CINECA webinar slides: Modular and reproducible workflows for federated molec...CINECAProject
 
CEDAR work bench for metadata management
CEDAR work bench for metadata managementCEDAR work bench for metadata management
CEDAR work bench for metadata managementPistoia Alliance
 
Article Example 1.pdf
Article Example 1.pdfArticle Example 1.pdf
Article Example 1.pdfstudywriters
 
Analysis-of-data-with-missing-values.pptx
Analysis-of-data-with-missing-values.pptxAnalysis-of-data-with-missing-values.pptx
Analysis-of-data-with-missing-values.pptxAASTHAJAJOO
 
Sampling of Blood
Sampling of BloodSampling of Blood
Sampling of Blooddrantopa
 
operationalizing asthma analytic plan using omop cdm brandt
operationalizing asthma analytic plan using omop cdm brandtoperationalizing asthma analytic plan using omop cdm brandt
operationalizing asthma analytic plan using omop cdm brandtMarion Sills
 
150224 giab 30 min generic slides
150224 giab 30 min generic slides150224 giab 30 min generic slides
150224 giab 30 min generic slidesGenomeInABottle
 

Similar to CBS/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll April 2011 (20)

Criminal Justice Statistics Lab 4CRJS-3020-01 Points 30A
Criminal Justice Statistics Lab 4CRJS-3020-01  Points 30ACriminal Justice Statistics Lab 4CRJS-3020-01  Points 30A
Criminal Justice Statistics Lab 4CRJS-3020-01 Points 30A
 
1. How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity 3
1.  How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity  31.  How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity  3
1. How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity 3
 
1. How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity 3
1.  How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity  31.  How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity  3
1. How is brain development related to adolescent impulsivity 3
 
Aries systems eemug 2021 manuscript eval services panel sci score v2_edits
Aries systems eemug 2021 manuscript eval services panel sci score v2_editsAries systems eemug 2021 manuscript eval services panel sci score v2_edits
Aries systems eemug 2021 manuscript eval services panel sci score v2_edits
 
Farid Ali Presentation_Final.pptx
Farid Ali Presentation_Final.pptxFarid Ali Presentation_Final.pptx
Farid Ali Presentation_Final.pptx
 
Robust biomarker selection from RT-qPCR data using statistical consensus crit...
Robust biomarker selection from RT-qPCR data using statistical consensus crit...Robust biomarker selection from RT-qPCR data using statistical consensus crit...
Robust biomarker selection from RT-qPCR data using statistical consensus crit...
 
FAIR as a Working Principle for Cancer Genomic Data
FAIR as a Working Principle for Cancer Genomic DataFAIR as a Working Principle for Cancer Genomic Data
FAIR as a Working Principle for Cancer Genomic Data
 
Analyzing Road Side Breath Test Data with WEKA
Analyzing Road Side Breath Test Data with WEKAAnalyzing Road Side Breath Test Data with WEKA
Analyzing Road Side Breath Test Data with WEKA
 
High Sensitivity Sanger Sequencing for Minor Variant Detection
High Sensitivity Sanger Sequencing for Minor Variant DetectionHigh Sensitivity Sanger Sequencing for Minor Variant Detection
High Sensitivity Sanger Sequencing for Minor Variant Detection
 
CINECA webinar slides: Modular and reproducible workflows for federated molec...
CINECA webinar slides: Modular and reproducible workflows for federated molec...CINECA webinar slides: Modular and reproducible workflows for federated molec...
CINECA webinar slides: Modular and reproducible workflows for federated molec...
 
CEDAR work bench for metadata management
CEDAR work bench for metadata managementCEDAR work bench for metadata management
CEDAR work bench for metadata management
 
Article Example 1.pdf
Article Example 1.pdfArticle Example 1.pdf
Article Example 1.pdf
 
Multivariate Analysis.ppt
Multivariate Analysis.pptMultivariate Analysis.ppt
Multivariate Analysis.ppt
 
Multivariate analysis
Multivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
 
Analysis-of-data-with-missing-values.pptx
Analysis-of-data-with-missing-values.pptxAnalysis-of-data-with-missing-values.pptx
Analysis-of-data-with-missing-values.pptx
 
Sampling of Blood
Sampling of BloodSampling of Blood
Sampling of Blood
 
Parameter
ParameterParameter
Parameter
 
operationalizing asthma analytic plan using omop cdm brandt
operationalizing asthma analytic plan using omop cdm brandtoperationalizing asthma analytic plan using omop cdm brandt
operationalizing asthma analytic plan using omop cdm brandt
 
150224 giab 30 min generic slides
150224 giab 30 min generic slides150224 giab 30 min generic slides
150224 giab 30 min generic slides
 
Biosocial research missing data
Biosocial research missing dataBiosocial research missing data
Biosocial research missing data
 

More from tidwellveronique

EDUC 742EDUC 742Reading Summary and Reflective Comments .docx
EDUC 742EDUC 742Reading Summary and Reflective Comments .docxEDUC 742EDUC 742Reading Summary and Reflective Comments .docx
EDUC 742EDUC 742Reading Summary and Reflective Comments .docxtidwellveronique
 
EDUC 380 Blog Post Samples Module 1 The Brain Below .docx
EDUC 380 Blog Post Samples Module 1 The Brain  Below .docxEDUC 380 Blog Post Samples Module 1 The Brain  Below .docx
EDUC 380 Blog Post Samples Module 1 The Brain Below .docxtidwellveronique
 
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docxEDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docxtidwellveronique
 
EDUC 740Prayer Reflection Report Grading RubricCriteriaLev.docx
EDUC 740Prayer Reflection Report Grading RubricCriteriaLev.docxEDUC 740Prayer Reflection Report Grading RubricCriteriaLev.docx
EDUC 740Prayer Reflection Report Grading RubricCriteriaLev.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDUC 6733 Action Research for EducatorsReading LiteracyDraft.docx
EDUC 6733 Action Research for EducatorsReading LiteracyDraft.docxEDUC 6733 Action Research for EducatorsReading LiteracyDraft.docx
EDUC 6733 Action Research for EducatorsReading LiteracyDraft.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDUC 637Technology Portfolio InstructionsGeneral OverviewF.docx
EDUC 637Technology Portfolio InstructionsGeneral OverviewF.docxEDUC 637Technology Portfolio InstructionsGeneral OverviewF.docx
EDUC 637Technology Portfolio InstructionsGeneral OverviewF.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDUC 364 The Role of Cultural Diversity in Schooling A dialecti.docx
EDUC 364 The Role of Cultural Diversity in Schooling A dialecti.docxEDUC 364 The Role of Cultural Diversity in Schooling A dialecti.docx
EDUC 364 The Role of Cultural Diversity in Schooling A dialecti.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDUC 144 Writing Tips The writing assignments in this cla.docx
EDUC 144 Writing Tips  The writing assignments in this cla.docxEDUC 144 Writing Tips  The writing assignments in this cla.docx
EDUC 144 Writing Tips The writing assignments in this cla.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDUC 1300- LEARNING FRAMEWORK Portfolio Page Prompts .docx
EDUC 1300- LEARNING FRAMEWORK Portfolio Page Prompts .docxEDUC 1300- LEARNING FRAMEWORK Portfolio Page Prompts .docx
EDUC 1300- LEARNING FRAMEWORK Portfolio Page Prompts .docxtidwellveronique
 
EDU734 Teaching and Learning Environment Week 5.docx
EDU734 Teaching and  Learning Environment Week 5.docxEDU734 Teaching and  Learning Environment Week 5.docx
EDU734 Teaching and Learning Environment Week 5.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDU 505 – Contemporary Issues in EducationCOURSE DESCRIPTION.docx
EDU 505 – Contemporary Issues in EducationCOURSE DESCRIPTION.docxEDU 505 – Contemporary Issues in EducationCOURSE DESCRIPTION.docx
EDU 505 – Contemporary Issues in EducationCOURSE DESCRIPTION.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDU 3338 Lesson Plan TemplateCandidate NameCooperatin.docx
EDU 3338 Lesson Plan TemplateCandidate NameCooperatin.docxEDU 3338 Lesson Plan TemplateCandidate NameCooperatin.docx
EDU 3338 Lesson Plan TemplateCandidate NameCooperatin.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDU 3215 Lesson Plan Template & Elements Name Andres Rod.docx
EDU 3215 Lesson Plan Template & Elements  Name Andres Rod.docxEDU 3215 Lesson Plan Template & Elements  Name Andres Rod.docx
EDU 3215 Lesson Plan Template & Elements Name Andres Rod.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDST 1100R SITUATED LEARNING EDST 1100 N Situated Learning .docx
EDST 1100R SITUATED LEARNING  EDST 1100 N Situated Learning .docxEDST 1100R SITUATED LEARNING  EDST 1100 N Situated Learning .docx
EDST 1100R SITUATED LEARNING EDST 1100 N Situated Learning .docxtidwellveronique
 
EDU 151 Thematic Unit Required ComponentsThematic Unit Requireme.docx
EDU 151 Thematic Unit Required ComponentsThematic Unit Requireme.docxEDU 151 Thematic Unit Required ComponentsThematic Unit Requireme.docx
EDU 151 Thematic Unit Required ComponentsThematic Unit Requireme.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDSP 429Differentiated Instruction PowerPoint InstructionsThe .docx
EDSP 429Differentiated Instruction PowerPoint InstructionsThe .docxEDSP 429Differentiated Instruction PowerPoint InstructionsThe .docx
EDSP 429Differentiated Instruction PowerPoint InstructionsThe .docxtidwellveronique
 
EDSP 429Fact Sheet on Disability Categories InstructionsThe pu.docx
EDSP 429Fact Sheet on Disability Categories InstructionsThe pu.docxEDSP 429Fact Sheet on Disability Categories InstructionsThe pu.docx
EDSP 429Fact Sheet on Disability Categories InstructionsThe pu.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDSP 370Individualized Education Plan (IEP) InstructionsThe .docx
EDSP 370Individualized Education Plan (IEP) InstructionsThe .docxEDSP 370Individualized Education Plan (IEP) InstructionsThe .docx
EDSP 370Individualized Education Plan (IEP) InstructionsThe .docxtidwellveronique
 
EDSP 377Scenario InstructionsScenario 2 Teaching communicatio.docx
EDSP 377Scenario InstructionsScenario 2 Teaching communicatio.docxEDSP 377Scenario InstructionsScenario 2 Teaching communicatio.docx
EDSP 377Scenario InstructionsScenario 2 Teaching communicatio.docxtidwellveronique
 
EDSP 377Autism Interventions1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).docx
EDSP 377Autism Interventions1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).docxEDSP 377Autism Interventions1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).docx
EDSP 377Autism Interventions1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).docxtidwellveronique
 

More from tidwellveronique (20)

EDUC 742EDUC 742Reading Summary and Reflective Comments .docx
EDUC 742EDUC 742Reading Summary and Reflective Comments .docxEDUC 742EDUC 742Reading Summary and Reflective Comments .docx
EDUC 742EDUC 742Reading Summary and Reflective Comments .docx
 
EDUC 380 Blog Post Samples Module 1 The Brain Below .docx
EDUC 380 Blog Post Samples Module 1 The Brain  Below .docxEDUC 380 Blog Post Samples Module 1 The Brain  Below .docx
EDUC 380 Blog Post Samples Module 1 The Brain Below .docx
 
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docxEDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
 
EDUC 740Prayer Reflection Report Grading RubricCriteriaLev.docx
EDUC 740Prayer Reflection Report Grading RubricCriteriaLev.docxEDUC 740Prayer Reflection Report Grading RubricCriteriaLev.docx
EDUC 740Prayer Reflection Report Grading RubricCriteriaLev.docx
 
EDUC 6733 Action Research for EducatorsReading LiteracyDraft.docx
EDUC 6733 Action Research for EducatorsReading LiteracyDraft.docxEDUC 6733 Action Research for EducatorsReading LiteracyDraft.docx
EDUC 6733 Action Research for EducatorsReading LiteracyDraft.docx
 
EDUC 637Technology Portfolio InstructionsGeneral OverviewF.docx
EDUC 637Technology Portfolio InstructionsGeneral OverviewF.docxEDUC 637Technology Portfolio InstructionsGeneral OverviewF.docx
EDUC 637Technology Portfolio InstructionsGeneral OverviewF.docx
 
EDUC 364 The Role of Cultural Diversity in Schooling A dialecti.docx
EDUC 364 The Role of Cultural Diversity in Schooling A dialecti.docxEDUC 364 The Role of Cultural Diversity in Schooling A dialecti.docx
EDUC 364 The Role of Cultural Diversity in Schooling A dialecti.docx
 
EDUC 144 Writing Tips The writing assignments in this cla.docx
EDUC 144 Writing Tips  The writing assignments in this cla.docxEDUC 144 Writing Tips  The writing assignments in this cla.docx
EDUC 144 Writing Tips The writing assignments in this cla.docx
 
EDUC 1300- LEARNING FRAMEWORK Portfolio Page Prompts .docx
EDUC 1300- LEARNING FRAMEWORK Portfolio Page Prompts .docxEDUC 1300- LEARNING FRAMEWORK Portfolio Page Prompts .docx
EDUC 1300- LEARNING FRAMEWORK Portfolio Page Prompts .docx
 
EDU734 Teaching and Learning Environment Week 5.docx
EDU734 Teaching and  Learning Environment Week 5.docxEDU734 Teaching and  Learning Environment Week 5.docx
EDU734 Teaching and Learning Environment Week 5.docx
 
EDU 505 – Contemporary Issues in EducationCOURSE DESCRIPTION.docx
EDU 505 – Contemporary Issues in EducationCOURSE DESCRIPTION.docxEDU 505 – Contemporary Issues in EducationCOURSE DESCRIPTION.docx
EDU 505 – Contemporary Issues in EducationCOURSE DESCRIPTION.docx
 
EDU 3338 Lesson Plan TemplateCandidate NameCooperatin.docx
EDU 3338 Lesson Plan TemplateCandidate NameCooperatin.docxEDU 3338 Lesson Plan TemplateCandidate NameCooperatin.docx
EDU 3338 Lesson Plan TemplateCandidate NameCooperatin.docx
 
EDU 3215 Lesson Plan Template & Elements Name Andres Rod.docx
EDU 3215 Lesson Plan Template & Elements  Name Andres Rod.docxEDU 3215 Lesson Plan Template & Elements  Name Andres Rod.docx
EDU 3215 Lesson Plan Template & Elements Name Andres Rod.docx
 
EDST 1100R SITUATED LEARNING EDST 1100 N Situated Learning .docx
EDST 1100R SITUATED LEARNING  EDST 1100 N Situated Learning .docxEDST 1100R SITUATED LEARNING  EDST 1100 N Situated Learning .docx
EDST 1100R SITUATED LEARNING EDST 1100 N Situated Learning .docx
 
EDU 151 Thematic Unit Required ComponentsThematic Unit Requireme.docx
EDU 151 Thematic Unit Required ComponentsThematic Unit Requireme.docxEDU 151 Thematic Unit Required ComponentsThematic Unit Requireme.docx
EDU 151 Thematic Unit Required ComponentsThematic Unit Requireme.docx
 
EDSP 429Differentiated Instruction PowerPoint InstructionsThe .docx
EDSP 429Differentiated Instruction PowerPoint InstructionsThe .docxEDSP 429Differentiated Instruction PowerPoint InstructionsThe .docx
EDSP 429Differentiated Instruction PowerPoint InstructionsThe .docx
 
EDSP 429Fact Sheet on Disability Categories InstructionsThe pu.docx
EDSP 429Fact Sheet on Disability Categories InstructionsThe pu.docxEDSP 429Fact Sheet on Disability Categories InstructionsThe pu.docx
EDSP 429Fact Sheet on Disability Categories InstructionsThe pu.docx
 
EDSP 370Individualized Education Plan (IEP) InstructionsThe .docx
EDSP 370Individualized Education Plan (IEP) InstructionsThe .docxEDSP 370Individualized Education Plan (IEP) InstructionsThe .docx
EDSP 370Individualized Education Plan (IEP) InstructionsThe .docx
 
EDSP 377Scenario InstructionsScenario 2 Teaching communicatio.docx
EDSP 377Scenario InstructionsScenario 2 Teaching communicatio.docxEDSP 377Scenario InstructionsScenario 2 Teaching communicatio.docx
EDSP 377Scenario InstructionsScenario 2 Teaching communicatio.docx
 
EDSP 377Autism Interventions1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).docx
EDSP 377Autism Interventions1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).docxEDSP 377Autism Interventions1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).docx
EDSP 377Autism Interventions1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).docx
 

Recently uploaded

Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdfClass 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdfakmcokerachita
 
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting DataJhengPantaleon
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...M56BOOKSTORE PRODUCT/SERVICE
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsanshu789521
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsKarinaGenton
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppCeline George
 
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxMENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxPoojaSen20
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdfClass 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
Class 11 Legal Studies Ch-1 Concept of State .pdf
 
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
_Math 4-Q4 Week 5.pptx Steps in Collecting Data
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
 
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha electionsPresiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
Presiding Officer Training module 2024 lok sabha elections
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docxMENTAL     STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION format.docx
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 

CBS/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll April 2011

  • 1. CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, April #2, 2011 ICPSR 33962 CBS News 60 Minutes Vanity Fair Codebook Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use The terms of use for this study can be found at: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/33962/term s Information about Copyrighted Content Some instruments administered as part of this study may contain in whole or substantially in part contents from copyrighted instruments. Reproductions of
  • 2. the instruments are provided as documentation for the analysis of the data associated with this collection. Restrictions on "fair use" apply to all copyrighted content. More information about the reproduction of copyrighted works by educators and librarians is available from the United States Copyright Office. NOTICE WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/33962/term s ICPSR PROCESSING NOTES FOR # 33962 CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Survey, April #2, 2011 1) Undocumented Variables: No information was provided for
  • 3. variables COVR, KAPP, BTCH, FLIP, FLP2, FLP3, and FLP4. Data Completeness Report Notes: (1) Variables are individually listed only if they have greater than 5% missing data. These variables are listed under the appropriate percentage category in the order in which they appear in the data file. (2) The Data Completeness Report only captures information about system missing or other values that are declared missing. Codes that have a label implying that they are missing but that are not declared missing values are not reflected in this report. Data users should consult the codebook for more specific information about missing values. (3) Some variables that have 100% missing data may have been blanked by ICPSR to protect respondent confidentiality. Data users should consult the codebook for more specific information about blanked variables. (4) Data do not contain skip patterns or skip patterns are not reflected in the data as coded. Table 1: Distribution of Variables by Percentage of Missing Values Percent of Cases with Missing Values Variable Name and Label (Total Cases = 848 )
  • 4. have 0% Missing Values( 78 of 98 variables)79.6% have 0% - 1% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0% have 1% - 3% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0% have 3% - 5% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0% have 5% - 10% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0% have 10% - 20% Missing Values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0% have 20% - 40% Missing Values( 4 of 98 variables)4.1% 23.9%Congressional DistrictCD 23.9%urbanityURBN 23.9%msc codeMSC 23.9%Number of female adultsFEMM have 40% - 99% Missing Values( 16 of 98 variables)16.3% 47.4%Opinion Barack ObamaQ4 47.4%Opinion Michelle ObamaQ5 47.4%Opinion PawlentyQ6 47.4%Opinion PalinQ7 47.4%Opinion TrumpQ8 52.6%Opinion re Barack ObamaQ10 52.6%Opinion re Michelle ObamaQ11 52.6%Opinion re PawlentyQ12 52.6%Opinion re PalinQ13 52.6%Opinion re TrumpQ14 55.5%Family appreciates as motherQ34 76.9%Friend/Relative Died Sept 11 AttackQ54 70.5%Choose NomineeQ55 84.2%Post Grad DegreePEDU
  • 5. 83.7%Income Over 250KI250 87.1%number other phonesNPH0 have 100% missing values( 0 of 98 variables)0.0% - i - - ICPSR 33962 - ICPSR 33962 CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, April #2, 2011 Variable Description and Frequencies Note: Frequencies displayed for the variables are not weighted. They are purely descriptive and may not be representative of the study population. Please review any sampling or weighting information available with the study. Summary statistics (minimum, maximum, mean, median, and standard deviation) may not be available for every variable in the codebook. Conversely, a listing of frequencies in table format may not be present for every variable in the codebook either. However, all variables in the dataset are present and display sufficient information about each variable. These decisions are made intentionally and are at the discretion of the archive producing this codebook. - 1 -
  • 6. CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, April #2, 2011 caseidCASEID 1-5 (width: 5; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: caseidQuestion: Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. Day of SurveyDYOF 6-6 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Day of SurveyQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 21.5 %182First1 25.8 %219Second2 21.3 %181Third3 31.4 %266Fourth4 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.63
  • 7. • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 4.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 4.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.14 Day of WeekDAYS 7-7 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Day of WeekQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 31.4 %266Sunday1 20.2 %171Thursday5 27.1 %230Friday6 21.3 %181Saturday7 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 4.44 • Median: 5.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 - 2 -
  • 8. - Study 33962 - • Maximum: 7.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.42 Respondent's SexSEX 8-8 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Respondent's SexQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 40.7 %345Male1 59.3 %503Female2 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.59 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 2.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.49 Interviewer's SexSINT 9-9 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 9. numericVariable Type: Interviewer's SexQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 40.2 %341Male1 59.8 %507Female2 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.60 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 2.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.49 Interviewer's RaceRINT 10-10 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Interviewer's RaceQuestion: - 3 - - Study 33962 -
  • 10. %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 50.2 %426Caucasian1 27.5 %233African-American2 1.8 %15Hispanic/Other3 20.5 %174DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.95 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 3.11 Congressional DistrictCD 11-12 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Congressional DistrictQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency Value
  • 11. 0.8 %70 5.1 %431 2.2 %192 3.2 %273 2.4 %204 0.9 %85 1.9 %166 1.8 %157 0.9 %88 1.2 %109 1.3 %1110 2.2 %1911 0.8 %712 2.0 %1713 0.7 %614 0.7 %615 0.9 %816 2.0 %1717
  • 12. 1.4 %1218 1.7 %1419 1.5 %1320 - 4 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency Value 0.1 %121 0.5 %422 2.2 %1923 1.9 %1624 0.6 %525 0.8 %727 0.1 %128 0.6 %529 0.5 %430 0.6 %532
  • 13. 0.7 %633 0.9 %834 1.3 %1135 0.2 %236 0.5 %437 0.4 %338 1.8 %1539 0.8 %740 1.1 %941 0.6 %542 0.2 %243 0.4 %344 0.2 %245 0.1 %146 0.2 %247 0.6 %548 0.2 %249 0.5 %450
  • 14. 0.7 %651 0.9 %852 0.9 %853 0.4 %354 0.7 %655 0.6 %556 1.3 %1157 0.6 %558 0.9 %859 0.9 %860 0.4 %361 1.2 %1062 - 5 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency Value
  • 15. 0.8 %763 0.4 %364 0.1 %165 1.1 %966 0.9 %867 0.1 %168 0.7 %669 1.2 %1070 0.8 %771 0.7 %673 0.2 %274 0.8 %775 0.4 %377 0.1 %178 0.4 %379 0.2 %281 0.6 %582 0.1 %184
  • 16. 0.4 %386 0.2 %287 0.4 %388 0.1 %189 0.2 %290 0.2 %291 0.5 %493 0.1 %196 0.4 %398 23.9 %203. (M) Based upon 645 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 31.36 • Median: 23.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 0.00 • Maximum: 98.00 • Standard Deviation: 26.14 census regionCENR 13-13 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: - 6 -
  • 17. - Study 33962 - census regionQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 21.1 %179NorthEast1 23.3 %198NorthCentral2 35.4 %300South3 20.2 %171West4 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.55 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 3.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 4.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.04 cbs regionCBSR 14-14 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: cbs regionQuestion:
  • 18. %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 23.0 %195NorthEast1 23.3 %198NorthCentral2 33.5 %284South3 20.2 %171West4 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.51 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 3.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 4.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.06 state codeSTCD 15-16 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: state codeQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue
  • 19. 1.8 %15Alabama1 - 7 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 0.4 %3Alaska2 1.3 %11Arizona3 1.1 %9Arkansas4 8.8 %75California5 1.5 %13Colorado6 1.3 %11Connecticut7 0.6 %5District of Columbia9 5.1 %43Florida10 3.4 %29Georgia11 0.7 %6Idaho13 2.9 %25Illinois14 2.7 %23Indiana15
  • 20. 0.8 %7Iowa16 1.1 %9Kansas17 1.9 %16Kentucky18 1.5 %13Louisiana19 1.3 %11Maine20 0.9 %8Maryland21 1.8 %15Massachusetts22 3.3 %28Michigan23 2.4 %20Minnesota24 0.4 %3Mississippi25 1.5 %13Missouri26 0.9 %8Montana27 0.7 %6Nebraska28 0.8 %7Nevada29 0.5 %4New Hampshire30 3.3 %28New Jersey31 0.4 %3New Mexico32 6.8 %58New York33
  • 21. 3.1 %26North Carolina34 0.2 %2North Dakota35 4.8 %41Ohio36 1.4 %12Oklahoma37 2.6 %22Oregon38 4.6 %39Pennsylvania39 0.2 %2Rhode Island40 1.9 %16South Carolina41 0.5 %4South Dakota42 2.5 %21Tennessee43 - 8 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 6.2 %53Texas44 0.9 %8Utah45
  • 22. 0.5 %4Vermont46 3.9 %33Virginia47 1.7 %14Washington48 0.5 %4West Virginia49 2.5 %21Wisconsin50 0.1 %1Wyoming51 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 26.25 • Median: 28.00 • Mode: 5.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 51.00 • Standard Deviation: 14.74 urbanityURBN 17-17 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: urbanityQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 6.8 %58Large central city (over 500k)1
  • 23. 14.0 %119Central city (50 to 500k)2 32.8 %278Suburbs3 22.4 %190Rural5 23.9 %203-. (M) Based upon 645 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.22 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 3.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.29 msc codeMSC 18-18 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: - 9 - - Study 33962 - msc codeQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue
  • 24. 20.9 %177Central city of multi-county SMSA1 13.9 %118Not in central city, but in county containing all/part of the central city 2 18.6 %158Suburban county of the SMSA3 3.4 %29In an SMSA consisting of just one county4 19.2 %163Not in an SMSA5 23.9 %203-. (M) Based upon 645 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.82 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.52 Time Zone CodesTZC 19-19 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Time Zone CodesQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency
  • 25. LabelValue 50.9 %432Eastern1 28.8 %244Central2 5.5 %47Mountain3 13.9 %118Pacific4 0.8 %7Bering5 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.85 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.08 Adults in householdADLT 20-20 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: - 10 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency
  • 26. Value 35.0 %2971 48.0 %4072 11.1 %943 4.4 %374 0.9 %85 0.2 %26 0.2 %28 0.1 %19 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.91 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.95 Number of female adultsFEMM 21-21 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Number of WomenQuestion: %Unweighted
  • 27. Frequency LabelValue 9.8 %83-0 57.5 %488-1 8.0 %68-2 0.7 %6-3 23.9 %203-. (M) Based upon 645 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.00 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 0.00 • Maximum: 3.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.52 First Dial ResultFDIA 22-22 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: - 11 - - Study 33962 - First Dial ResultQuestion:
  • 28. %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 0.7 %6Not in service - Disconnected - Nonworking -0 75.1 %637Someone answers speaking English1 9.9 %84No answer2 4.8 %41Busy3 0.1 %1Business or other non-residence i.e. computer line5 9.3 %79Mechanical answering machine9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.94 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 0.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.33 Number of DialingsFCLL 23-23 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Number of DialingsQuestion: %Unweighted
  • 29. Frequency Value 63.4 %5381 30.2 %2562 4.5 %383 0.9 %84 0.5 %45 0.2 %26 0.1 %17 0.1 %19 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.47 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.78 Cover SheetCOVR - 12 - - Study 33962 -
  • 30. 24-24 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: %Unweighted Frequency Value 15.7 %1331 16.7 %1422 17.0 %1443 17.7 %1504 15.9 %1355 17.0 %1446 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.52 • Median: 4.00 • Mode: 4.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 6.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.69 Was Ever AppointmentKAPP 25-25 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type:
  • 31. Was Ever AppointmentQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 10.1 %86Yes1 89.9 %762No2 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.90 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 2.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.30 2-Way Rotation VariableFLIP 26-26 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: 2-Way Rotation VariableQuestion: - 13 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted
  • 32. Frequency Value 52.6 %4461 47.4 %4022 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.47 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 2.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.50 4-Way RotationFLP2 27-27 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: 4-Way RotationQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency Value 24.3 %2061 24.9 %2112 24.3 %2063
  • 33. 26.5 %2254 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.53 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 4.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 4.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.13 4-way Rotation/Selection VariableFLP3 28-28 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: 4-way Rotation/Selection VariableQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency Value 24.8 %2101 26.3 %2232 24.2 %2053 24.8 %2104 - 14 - - Study 33962 -
  • 34. Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.49 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 4.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.11 3-Way RotationFLP4 29-29 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: 3-Way RotationQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency Value 32.9 %2791 32.4 %2752 34.7 %2943 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.02 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 3.00 • Minimum: 1.00
  • 35. • Maximum: 3.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.82 ReplicateBTCH 30-31 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: %Unweighted Frequency Value 1.1 %91 1.7 %142 1.7 %143 1.3 %114 1.1 %95 1.2 %106 1.5 %137 1.2 %108 1.1 %99 1.4 %1210 2.0 %1711
  • 36. - 15 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency Value 1.3 %1112 0.9 %813 1.9 %1614 1.2 %1015 2.1 %1816 1.8 %1517 0.9 %818 1.1 %919 1.9 %1620 0.8 %721 7.3 %6222 6.2 %5323 5.2 %4424
  • 37. 6.2 %5325 5.9 %5026 1.7 %1427 1.3 %1128 1.1 %929 2.4 %2030 1.2 %1031 1.5 %1332 1.3 %1133 1.9 %1634 0.8 %735 1.7 %1436 1.1 %937 1.7 %1438 0.9 %839 1.3 %1140 1.4 %1241 1.1 %942
  • 38. 1.4 %1243 1.2 %1044 1.1 %945 1.7 %1446 1.1 %947 1.9 %1648 0.6 %549 1.2 %1050 1.1 %951 - 16 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency Value 0.9 %852 1.3 %1153 2.1 %1854
  • 39. 1.2 %1055 1.3 %1156 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 27.05 • Median: 25.00 • Mode: 22.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 56.00 • Standard Deviation: 14.07 OversampleOSMP 32-32 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: OversampleQuestion: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 76.1 %645RDD1 23.9 %203Cell Phone Sample9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.92 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00
  • 40. • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 3.42 Final WeightWGHT 33-39 (width: 7; decimal: 3)Location: numericVariable Type: Final WeightQuestion: Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.000 • Minimum: 0.119 • Maximum: 14.583 • Standard Deviation: 0.976 - 17 - - Study 33962 - Obama Job ApprovalQ1 40-40 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president?Question: %Unweighted Frequency
  • 41. LabelValue 45.5 %386Approve1 45.3 %384Disapprove2 9.2 %78DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.19 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.22 Right Direction/Wrong TrackQ2 41-41 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Do you feel things in this country are generally going in the right direction or do you feel things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 25.8 %219Right direction1
  • 42. 66.5 %564Wrong track2 7.7 %65DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.28 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.99 Opinion Barack ObamaQ4 42-42 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): - 18 - - Study 33962 - Is your opinion of Barack Obama favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Barack Obama yet to have an opinion? Question: %Unweighted Frequency
  • 43. LabelValue 21.3 %181Favorable1 20.9 %177Not favorable2 8.0 %68Undecided3 1.2 %10Haven't heard enough4 1.2 %10Refused5 47.4 %402-. (M) Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.86 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.91 Opinion Michelle ObamaQ5 43-43 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Is your opinion of Michelle Obama favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Michelle Obama yet to have an opinion? Question:
  • 44. %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 25.4 %215Favorable1 7.3 %62Not favorable2 7.2 %61Undecided3 11.8 %100Haven't heard enough4 0.9 %8Refused5 47.4 %402-. (M) Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.16 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.29 Opinion PawlentyQ6 - 19 - - Study 33962 - 44-44 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 45. numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Is your opinion of Tim Pawlenty (Paw-LEN-ty) favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Tim Pawlenty (Paw-LEN-ty) yet to have an opinion? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 2.8 %24Favorable1 5.7 %48Not favorable2 6.5 %55Undecided3 37.1 %315Haven't heard enough4 0.5 %4Refused5 47.4 %402-. (M) Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.51 • Median: 4.00 • Mode: 4.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00
  • 46. • Standard Deviation: 0.90 Opinion PalinQ7 45-45 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Is your opinion of Sarah Palin favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Sarah Palin yet to have an opinion? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 11.0 %93Favorable1 27.9 %237Not favorable2 9.4 %80Undecided3 4.0 %34Haven't heard enough4 0.2 %2Refused5 47.4 %402-. (M) Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.14
  • 47. • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 - 20 - - Study 33962 - • Standard Deviation: 0.85 Opinion TrumpQ8 46-46 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Is your opinion of Donald Trump favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Donald Trump yet to have an opinion? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 9.0 %76Favorable1 29.5 %250Not favorable2
  • 48. 9.8 %83Undecided3 4.2 %36Haven't heard enough4 0.1 %1Refused5 47.4 %402-. (M) Based upon 446 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.18 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.82 Opinion re Barack ObamaQ10 47-47 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): We'd like to get your opinion of some people in the news. For each of the following people, please say whether your opinion is favorable, not favorable, undecided, or whether you haven't heard enough Question: about him or her yet to have an opinion. Barack Obama? ([IF NECESSARY, READ:] Is your opinion of Barack Obama favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Barack
  • 49. Obama yet to have an opinion?) %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 21.9 %186Favorable1 18.2 %154Not favorable2 5.1 %43Undecided3 1.8 %15Haven't heard enough4 0.5 %4Refused5 52.6 %446-. (M) Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases. - 21 - - Study 33962 - • Mean: 1.75 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.86 Opinion re Michelle ObamaQ11
  • 50. 48-48 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Michelle Obama? ([IF NECESSARY, READ:] Is your opinion of Michelle Obama favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Michelle Obama yet to have an opinion?) Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 26.2 %222Favorable1 8.1 %69Not favorable2 6.2 %53Undecided3 6.4 %54Haven't heard enough4 0.5 %4Refused5 52.6 %446-. (M) Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.88 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00
  • 51. • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.14 Opinion re PawlentyQ12 49-49 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Tim Pawlenty (Paw-LEN-ty)? ([IF NECESSARY, READ:] Is your opinion of Tim Pawlenty favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Tim Pawlenty yet to have an opinion?) Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 2.6 %22Favorable1 3.5 %30Not favorable2 6.0 %51Undecided3 35.1 %298Haven't heard enough4 - 22 - - Study 33962 -
  • 52. %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 0.1 %1Refused5 52.6 %446-. (M) Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.56 • Median: 4.00 • Mode: 4.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.85 Opinion re PalinQ13 50-50 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Sarah Palin? ([IF NECESSARY, READ:] Is your opinion of Sarah Palin favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Sarah Palin yet to have an opinion?) Question: %Unweighted Frequency
  • 53. LabelValue 11.0 %93Favorable1 26.1 %221Not favorable2 7.5 %64Undecided3 2.6 %22Haven't heard enough4 0.2 %2Refused5 52.6 %446-. (M) Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.05 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.81 Opinion re TrumpQ14 51-51 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Donald Trump? ([IF NECESSARY, READ:] Is your opinion of Donald Trump favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Donald Trump yet to have an opinion?)
  • 54. Question: - 23 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 9.2 %78Favorable1 28.5 %242Not favorable2 7.1 %60Undecided3 2.5 %21Haven't heard enough4 0.1 %1Refused5 52.6 %446-. (M) Based upon 402 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.07 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.76 U.S. Troops in AfghanistanQ15
  • 55. 52-52 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: How much longer do you think large numbers of U.S. troops will have to remain in Afghanistan--less than a year, one to two years, two to five years or longer than five years? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 14.2 %120Less than a year1 22.2 %188One to two years2 27.4 %232Two to five years3 19.1 %162Longer than five years4 3.8 %32As long as it takes (Vol.)5 4.8 %41Should leave now (Vol.)6 8.6 %73Don't know/No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.42 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 3.00
  • 56. • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.12 Gas price increase effectQ16 53-53 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: - 24 - - Study 33962 - Have recent price increases in gasoline caused any financial hardship for you or others in your household, or not? [IF YES, ASK:] Has that been a serious hardship, or not serious? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 42.0 %356Yes, serious1 32.1 %272Yes, not serious2 25.6 %217No3 0.4 %3DK/NA9
  • 57. Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.86 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.91 Gas price futureQ17 54-54 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: In the next few months, do you expect that the price of gasoline will go up, stay the same, or go down? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 76.2 %646Go up1 9.3 %79Stay the same2 9.7 %82Go down3 4.8 %41DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
  • 58. • Mean: 1.67 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.77 Change vacation plansQ18 55-55 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Do you expect to change your vacation plans this summer because of the cost of gasoline?Question: - 25 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 43.0 %365Yes1 53.7 %455No2 3.3 %28DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.80
  • 59. • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.42 Steps for gas priceQ19 56-57 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Have you taken any specific steps to help deal with the higher price of gas? [IF YES, ASK:] What is the most significant step you have taken? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 30.0 %254Driving less1 3.8 %32Carpooling2 2.0 %17Public transportation3 1.4 %12Riding a bike4 1.7 %14Walking5 2.4 %20Cheaper gas6 5.3 %45Fuel efficient car7
  • 60. 2.8 %24Cut other expenses8 5.1 %43Cut back travel plans9 0.4 %3Work from home10 0.6 %5Extra job11 1.4 %12Stay homr12 39.7 %337No, nothing97 2.4 %20Other98 1.2 %10DK/NA99 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 44.07 • Median: 9.00 • Mode: 97.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 99.00 - 26 - - Study 33962 - • Standard Deviation: 46.43 3-Way Abortion ChoiceQ20 58-58 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 61. numericVariable Type: Which of these comes closest to your view? Abortion should be generally available to those who want it, abortion should be available but under stricter limits than it is now, or abortion should not be permitted? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 39.5 %335Generally available1 34.3 %291Available but limits2 22.5 %191Should not be permitted3 3.7 %31Don't know/No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.09 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.55 Opinion OprahQ21 59-59 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 62. numericVariable Type: Is your opinion of Oprah Winfrey favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Oprah Winfrey yet to have an opinion? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 52.4 %444Favorable1 15.8 %134Not favorable2 21.3 %181Undecided3 7.9 %67Haven't heard enough4 2.6 %22Refused5 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.93 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.13 - 27 - - Study 33962 -
  • 63. Opinion Prince CharlesQ22 60-60 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: We'd like to get your overall opinion of some members of the British royal family. For each of the following people please say whether your opinion is favorable, not favorable, undecided, or whether you haven't heard enough about him or her yet to have an opinion. How about Prince Charles? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 27.4 %232Favorable1 25.8 %219Not favorable2 21.5 %182Undecided3 20.8 %176Haven't heard enough4 4.6 %39Refused5 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.49
  • 64. • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.22 Opinion Lady CamillaQ23 61-61 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: How about Prince Charles' wife Camilla?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 13.6 %115Favorable1 28.5 %242Not favorable2 19.3 %164Undecided3 34.8 %295Haven't heard enough4 3.8 %32Refused5 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.87 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 4.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 5.00
  • 65. • Standard Deviation: 1.14 - 28 - - Study 33962 - Rate personal happinessQ24 62-62 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Generally speaking, how happy would you say you are--very happy, fairly happy, or not too happy?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 46.8 %397Very happy1 44.2 %375Fairly happy2 8.0 %68Not too happy3 0.9 %8DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.68 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00
  • 66. • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.95 Happiness factorQ25 63-63 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: If you had to say, which one of the following things do you think is most important in determining how happy you are in life. 1. A rewarding career, 2. Being close with your family, 3. Having good health, 4. Having a lot of money, or 5. The area where you live? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 3.9 %33Career1 55.1 %467Family2 30.3 %257Health3 2.2 %19Money4 5.2 %44Where you live5 3.3 %28DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
  • 67. • Mean: 2.70 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.43 Decor satisfactionQ28 - 29 - - Study 33962 - 64-64 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: How satisfied are you with the decor and furniture in the main living areas of your home, very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, not very satisfied, or not satisfied at all? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 51.5 %437Very satisfied1 38.2 %324Somewhat satisfied2 5.9 %50Not very satisfied3
  • 68. 3.5 %30Not at all satisfied4 0.8 %7DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.67 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.01 Spending on decorQ29 65-65 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Compared to five years ago, are you currently spending more money, spending less money or spending about the same amount of money as you did five years ago on furniture and home decoration? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 20.8 %176More1 45.2 %383Less2
  • 69. 31.4 %266Same3 2.7 %23DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.30 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.33 Positive Thinking Affect LifeQ30 66-66 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: - 30 - - Study 33962 - numericVariable Type: In general, would you say thinking positively can make your life better, or does thinking positively not have much of an affect on how your life turns out? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue
  • 70. 87.1 %739Can make like better1 10.0 %85No effect2 0.2 %2Worse (vol.)3 2.6 %22DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.31 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.29 Positive Thinking Affect JobQ31 67-67 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: When it comes to getting a job if you are out of work, would you say thinking positively can help a lot, help a little, or won't it have any effect? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 69.8 %592A lot1
  • 71. 14.5 %123A little2 10.8 %92No effect3 4.8 %41DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.75 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.77 Positive Thinking Affect IllnessQ32 68-68 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: When it comes to overcoming a serious illness, would you say thinking positively can help a lot, help a little, or won't it have any effect? Question: - 31 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency
  • 72. LabelValue 76.7 %650A lot1 15.6 %132A little2 5.5 %47No effect3 2.2 %19DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.45 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.27 Being a motherQ33 69-69 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Compared to when you were a child, in general, do you think being a mother today is harder, easier, or about the same? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue
  • 73. 74.1 %628Harder1 7.1 %60Easier2 15.3 %130Same3 3.5 %30DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.66 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.59 kidsKIDS 70-70 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Do you have any children? [IF YES, ASK:] Are any of your children under 18?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 23.2 %197Yes, under 181 49.8 %422Yes, over 182 - 32 -
  • 74. - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 26.7 %226No3 0.4 %3DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.06 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.82 Family appreciates as motherQ34 71-71 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Do you feel your family appreciates you enough as a mother, or do they not appreciate you enough?Question: %Unweighted Frequency
  • 75. LabelValue 38.6 %327Yes, enough1 4.7 %40No, not enough2 1.2 %10DK/NA9 55.5 %471-. (M) Based upon 377 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.32 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.31 Economic Dichotomy WideningQ35 72-72 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: These days, do you feel that the rich are getting richer and everyone else is getting poorer, or is that not the case? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue
  • 76. 65.9 %559Rich getting richer1 27.7 %235Not the case2 6.4 %54DK/NA9 - 33 - - Study 33962 - Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.79 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.93 Memorial Day WeekendQ36 73-74 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: What do you, personally, plan to do on the Memorial Day weekend and holiday?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue
  • 77. 10.8 %92Stay home1 18.9 %160Family get-together2 9.2 %78Cookout3 5.4 %46Work4 3.8 %32Travel5 2.4 %20Camping6 0.8 %7Fishing7 4.2 %36Visit Gravesite8 3.9 %33Local event9 0.1 %1Home improvements10 0.4 %3Household chores11 1.3 %11Yard work12 0.2 %2Graduation parties13 0.5 %4Birthday party14 0.6 %5Religious observance15 1.4 %12Beach16 0.2 %2Golf17 0.4 %3Watch sports18
  • 78. 0.1 %1Watch TV19 24.9 %211Nothing97 2.4 %20Other98 8.1 %69DK/NA99 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 37.30 • Median: 6.00 • Mode: 97.00 - 34 - - Study 33962 - • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 99.00 • Standard Deviation: 44.69 See Blockbuster Movie This SummerQ37 75-75 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: How likely are you to go out and see one of the blockbuster movies expected to be released this summer -- very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely, or not at all likely? Question:
  • 79. %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 17.0 %144Very likely1 18.4 %156Somewhat likely2 22.6 %192Not very likely3 40.8 %346Not at all likely4 1.2 %10Don't know/No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.96 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 4.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.30 Movies Now vs 10 Yrs AgoQ38 76-76 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Compared to 10 years ago, do you think the blockbuster movies that are released in the summer are better now, worse now, or about the same as they were 10 years ago?
  • 80. Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 14.2 %120Better1 29.8 %253Worse2 36.8 %312Same3 19.2 %163Don't know/No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.57 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 3.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 - 35 - - Study 33962 - • Standard Deviation: 2.73 Detainees held in US prisonQ39 77-77 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type:
  • 81. Do you think detainees from the prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba can be safely held in federal maximum security prisons in the U.S., or don't you think they can be held safely in maximum security prisons in the U.S.? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 47.9 %406Yes, can be held safely in U.S. prisons1 35.8 %304No, cannot be held safely in U.S. prisons2 16.3 %138DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.66 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.83 Trump wealth realityQ40 78-78 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Do you think Donald Trump is as wealthy as he seems to be? 1.
  • 82. Yes, he's everything he says he is, or 2. No, his wealth is a comb-over. Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 42.1 %357Yes, he's everything he says he is1 39.2 %332No, his wealth is a comb-over2 18.8 %159DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.89 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.97 Civil war reasonQ41 79-79 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: - 36 - - Study 33962 - numericVariable Type:
  • 83. This year marks the 150th anniversary of the American Civil War. Why do you think that war was fought -- was it mainly about slavery or mainly about states' rights? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 39.0 %331Slavery1 48.9 %415States' rights2 12.0 %102DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.45 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.47 Live the longestQ42 80-80 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Which one of the following people do you think will live the longest? 1. Charlie Sheen, 2. Lindsay
  • 84. Lohan, or 3.Keith Richards? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 12.4 %105Charlie Sheen1 21.0 %178Lindsay Lohan2 32.1 %272Keith Richards3 34.6 %293DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 4.62 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 9.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 3.25 Prosecuting athletesQ43 81-81 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: It cost the U.S. government more than $6 million to try former Major League baseball player Barry Bonds. Do you think prosecuting athletes for cheating -- or lying about their cheating -- is a waste of
  • 85. money or money well spent? Question: - 37 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 68.4 %580A waste of money1 25.0 %212Money well spent2 6.6 %56DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.78 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.97 Islam peaceful religionQ44 82-82 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type:
  • 86. Compared to most other religions, do you think Islam is a more peaceful religion, a less peaceful religion, or do you think Islam is about as peaceful as most other religions? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 2.5 %21More1 35.5 %301Less2 45.4 %385About the same3 16.6 %141DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.59 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 3.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.47 Buy popular electronic productsQ45 83-83 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Are you among the first people you know to buy a new popular
  • 87. electronic product, like an iPad or smartphone, or are you more likely to wait for an updated, less expensive version of the product to come out, or do you generally not buy new popular electronic products? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 8.6 %73Among first I know to buy1 - 38 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 34.8 %295Wait for a updated/less expensive version2 55.3 %469Don't buy new/hot electronics3 1.3 %11DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.56 • Median: 3.00
  • 88. • Mode: 3.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.98 Definition T-M-ZQ46 84-84 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: What is T-M-Z? Is it 1. A jaw disorder, 2. A celebrity website and TV show, 3. A text message acronym the kids are using, or 4. A recreational drug? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 1.7 %14A jaw disorder1 51.4 %436A celebrity news website/show2 5.1 %43A text message acronym the kids are using3 2.7 %23A recreational drug4 39.2 %332DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 4.83 • Median: 2.00
  • 89. • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 3.37 Without air travel/internetQ47 85-85 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: If you had to choose, would it be easier for you to live without air travel or the internet?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 59.9 %508Air travel1 30.3 %257Internet2 - 39 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 9.8 %83DK/NA9
  • 90. Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.09 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.32 Opinion broken heart painQ48 86-86 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Recent studies suggest that the pain of a broken heart can be equivalent to physical pain. Do you agree or disagree? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 83.6 %709Yes, agree1 12.9 %109No, disagree2 3.5 %30DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.41 • Median: 1.00
  • 91. • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.49 Lied about ageQ49 87-87 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Have you ever lied about your age? [IF YES, ASK:] Have you lied to give the impression you are younger than you really are, older than you really are, or have you done both? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 5.7 %48Yes, younger than I am1 8.0 %68Yes, older than I am2 9.9 %84Yes, both3 75.9 %644No, haven't lied about my age4 0.5 %4DK/NA9 - 40 - - Study 33962 -
  • 92. Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.59 • Median: 4.00 • Mode: 4.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.94 Graffiti Legitimate ArtQ50 88-88 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Do you consider graffiti to be a legitimate art form like painting or sculpture, or not?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 30.8 %261Yes1 62.1 %527No2 7.1 %60Don't know/No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.19 • Median: 2.00
  • 93. • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.93 Attend religious servicesQ51 89-89 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Would you say you attend religious services every week, almost every week, once or twice a month, a few times a year, or never? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 27.2 %231Every week1 12.1 %103Almost every week2 10.8 %92Once or twice a month3 25.5 %216A few times a year4 23.2 %197Never5 1.1 %9Don't know/No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases.
  • 94. - 41 - - Study 33962 - • Mean: 3.12 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.66 Tea Party SupporterQ52 90-90 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Do you consider yourself to be a supporter of the Tea Party movement, or not?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 23.8 %202Yes1 67.2 %570No2 9.0 %76DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.39
  • 95. • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.12 Registered VoterREG 91-91 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: These last questions are for background only. Some people are registered to vote and others are not. Are you registered to vote in the precinct or election district where you now live, or aren't you? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 86.8 %736Yes1 13.0 %110No2 0.2 %2DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.15 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00
  • 96. • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.51 - 42 - - Study 33962 - Know of Sept 11 DeathQ53 92-92 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Do you or any of your friends know someone who was killed in the September 11th terrorist attack?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 23.1 %196Yes1 75.8 %643No2 1.1 %9DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.84 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00
  • 97. • Standard Deviation: 0.85 Friend/Relative Died Sept 11 AttackQ54 93-93 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Did you personally have a close friend or relative who was killed in the Sept. 11th terrorist attack?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 5.7 %48Yes1 17.5 %148No2 76.9 %652-. (M) Based upon 196 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.76 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 2.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.43 EvangelicalEVAN 94-94 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 98. numericVariable Type: Some people think of themselves as evangelical or born again Christians. Do you ever think of yourself in either of these ways? Question: - 43 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 25.8 %219Yes1 72.8 %617No2 1.4 %12DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.84 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.96 ReligionRELI
  • 99. 95-95 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: What is your religious preference today?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 55.3 %469Protestant (Please specify denomination)1 19.9 %169Catholic2 1.7 %14Jewish3 0.4 %3Muslim4 6.8 %58Other (Specify)5 12.5 %106None6 3.4 %29Don't know/ No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.42 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.17 Marital statusMARR
  • 100. 96-96 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Are you now married, widowed, divorced, separated, or have you never been married?Question: - 44 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 51.1 %433Married1 13.4 %114Widowed2 14.2 %120Divorced3 2.4 %20Separated4 18.6 %158Never been married5 0.4 %3DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.26 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00
  • 101. • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.59 Party IDPRTY 97-97 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Generally speaking, do you usually consider yourself a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? ? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 29.5 %250Republican1 34.9 %296Democrat2 27.6 %234Independent3 8.0 %68Don't know/No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.54 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00
  • 102. • Standard Deviation: 2.05 Choose NomineeQ55 98-98 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): - 45 - - Study 33962 - Thinking about the Republican party's nominee for President in 2012... if you had to choose, which is more important to you -- having a Republican nominee who agrees with your positions on most issues, or having a nominee with the best chance of defeating Barack Obama in November? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 16.7 %142Agrees with issues1 10.7 %91Win in November2 2.0 %17Don't know/No answer9
  • 103. 70.5 %598-. (M) Based upon 250 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.91 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.98 political philosophyPPHL 99-99 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: How would you describe your views on most political matters? Generally do you think of yourself as liberal, moderate, or conservative? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 22.5 %191Liberal1 36.3 %308Moderate2 34.3 %291Conservative3 6.8 %58DK/NA9
  • 104. Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.60 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.89 actual ageAGE 100-101 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: How old are you?Question: - 46 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 1.2 %10-18 0.7 %6-19 0.9 %8-20 1.7 %14-21
  • 105. 0.7 %6-22 1.4 %12-23 0.2 %2-24 1.1 %9-25 0.9 %8-26 0.4 %3-27 1.1 %9-28 0.9 %8-29 1.5 %13-30 1.4 %12-31 1.3 %11-32 0.6 %5-33 0.5 %4-34 0.5 %4-35 0.8 %7-36 0.5 %4-37 0.7 %6-38 1.4 %12-39
  • 106. 1.5 %13-40 1.7 %14-41 1.8 %15-42 0.9 %8-43 1.3 %11-44 0.9 %8-45 1.8 %15-46 1.9 %16-47 0.7 %6-48 1.9 %16-49 1.9 %16-50 1.4 %12-51 2.6 %22-52 1.8 %15-53 1.7 %14-54 2.2 %19-55 2.2 %19-56 1.8 %15-57
  • 107. - 47 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 1.9 %16-58 2.4 %20-59 1.8 %15-60 1.7 %14-61 2.9 %25-62 1.3 %11-63 2.5 %21-64 2.2 %19-65 1.4 %12-66 1.3 %11-67 2.2 %19-68 1.9 %16-69 2.0 %17-70
  • 108. 1.1 %9-71 0.9 %8-72 1.5 %13-73 1.4 %12-74 1.2 %10-75 0.9 %8-76 1.8 %15-77 1.2 %10-78 1.7 %14-79 0.9 %8-80 0.4 %3-81 1.4 %12-82 1.4 %12-83 0.7 %6-84 0.8 %7-85 0.6 %5-86 0.6 %5-87 0.2 %2-88
  • 109. 0.1 %1-89 0.2 %2-90 0.1 %1-92 0.2 %2-93 0.2 %2-94 0.1 %1-96 4.4 %37Refused99 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. - 48 - - Study 33962 - • Mean: 56.72 • Median: 57.00 • Mode: 99.00 • Minimum: 18.00 • Maximum: 99.00 • Standard Deviation: 20.03 age groupAGEA 102-102 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type:
  • 110. Are you between 18 and 29, 30 and 44, 45 and 64, or are you over 64?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 11.3 %96Between 18 and 291 17.0 %144Between 30 and 442 38.6 %327Between 45 and 643 32.2 %273Over 644 0.9 %8Refused9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.98 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 3.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.13 18 to 29 in HouseAGEC 103-103 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: How many people living in this household are 18 to 29 years of age? Be sure to include yourself.Question:
  • 111. %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 78.7 %667None0 11.0 %93-1 6.7 %57-2 1.4 %12-3 1.2 %10Four or more adults 18-29 years old4 1.1 %9DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 0.43 - 49 - - Study 33962 - • Median: 0.00 • Mode: 0.00 • Minimum: 0.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.17 educationEDUC 104-104 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 112. numericVariable Type: What was the last grade in school you completed?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 9.1 %77Not a High School grad1 25.5 %216High School grad2 29.0 %246Some college (trade or business)3 20.2 %171College grad4 15.8 %134Post grad work or degree (Masters, MBA, JD, MD, PhD)5 0.5 %4Refused9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.11 • Median: 3.00 • Mode: 3.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.27 Post Grad DegreePEDU 105-105 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 113. numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Did you complete the degree?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 13.1 %111Yes1 2.7 %23No2 84.2 %714-. (M) Based upon 134 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.17 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 - 50 - - Study 33962 - • Maximum: 2.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.38 HispanicHISP 106-106 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 114. numericVariable Type: Are you of Hispanic origin or descent, or not?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 5.2 %44Hispanic1 93.6 %794Not Hispanic2 1.2 %10Don't know/ No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.03 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.79 raceRACE 107-107 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Are you White, Black, Asian, or some other race?Question: %Unweighted Frequency
  • 115. LabelValue 82.0 %695White or Caucasian1 9.6 %81Black or African-American2 1.9 %16Asian3 4.2 %36Other(Specify)4 2.4 %20Refused9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.45 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.36 Standard IncomeINCA - 51 - - Study 33962 - 108-108 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Was your total family income in the year 2010 UNDER or OVER $50,000?Question:
  • 116. %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 10.5 %89Under $15,0001 15.1 %128$15,000 - $30,0002 16.0 %136$30,000 - $50,0003 22.5 %191$50,000-$75,0004 26.9 %228Over $75,0005 9.0 %76Won't specify/Refused9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 3.94 • Median: 4.00 • Mode: 5.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.05 NYTimesIncomeINCN 109-109 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Was your total family income in the year 2010 UNDER or OVER $50,000? Was it under $15,000, between $15,000 and $30,000, or between $30,000 and $50,000?
  • 117. Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 10.5 %89Under $15,0001 15.1 %128$15,000 - $30,0002 16.0 %136$30,000 - $50,0003 22.5 %191$50,000-$75,0004 10.6 %90$75,000-$100,0005 16.3 %138Over $100,0006 9.0 %76Won't specify/Refused9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 4.10 • Median: 4.00 • Mode: 4.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 2.17 - 52 - - Study 33962 -
  • 118. Income Over 250KI250 110-110 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: .Range of Missing Values (M): Was it over $250,000, or not?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 3.2 %27Yes, over $250,0001 12.6 %107No2 0.5 %4DK/NA9 83.7 %710-. (M) Based upon 138 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.01 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.28 Home Phone ServicePSRV 111-111 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 119. numericVariable Type: What type of telephone service is there in your home that you could use or be reached on? Is there both regular land line and cell phone service, or only regular land line service, or only cell phone service? Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 67.3 %571Both regular and cell1 19.7 %167Regular only2 12.0 %102Cell only3 0.9 %8DK/NA9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.51 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 1.01 other phones?NPH 112-112 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 120. - 53 - - Study 33962 - numericVariable Type: Are there any other telephone numbers in your home that I could have dialed and reached you on -- I don't mean extensions, but different telephone numbers? [IF NECESSARY SAY:] We need to know how hard or easy it is to reach people. Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 12.9 %109Yes1 86.2 %731No2 0.9 %8Don't know/No answer9 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.94 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 2.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.77
  • 121. number other phonesNPH0 113-113 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location: numericVariable Type: Now I dialed you at [#PHONE NUMBER], how many other numbers are there in your home?Question: %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 8.1 %69-1 1.7 %14-2 0.6 %5-3 2.5 %21Refused9 87.1 %739-. (M) Based upon 109 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 2.76 • Median: 1.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 9.00 • Standard Deviation: 3.10 Call Back WillingnessNM 114-114 (width: 1; decimal: 0)Location:
  • 122. numericVariable Type: Would you be willing to have a reporter call you back in a few days to discuss your views further?Question: - 54 - - Study 33962 - %Unweighted Frequency LabelValue 41.7 %354Willing, talkative1 25.0 %212Willing, not talkative2 33.3 %282Not willing3 Based upon 848 valid cases out of 848 total cases. • Mean: 1.92 • Median: 2.00 • Mode: 1.00 • Minimum: 1.00 • Maximum: 3.00 • Standard Deviation: 0.86 - 55 - - Study 33962 -
  • 123. ICPSR APPENDIX FOR # 33962 CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, April #2, 2011 The codes listed in the appendix provide the complete listing of states (including the District of Columbia) composing the CBS Region and Census Region variables (CBSR and CENR, respectively, in the codebook), as well as the state codes composing the CBS State Codes variable (STCD in the codebook). CBS Region Codes Northeast: Northcentral: Connecticut Illinois Delaware Indiana District of Columbia Iowa Maine Kansas Maryland Michigan Massachusetts Minnesota New Hampshire Missouri New Jersey Nebraska New York North Dakota Pennsylvania Ohio Rhode Island South Dakota Vermont Wisconsin West Virginia South: West: Alabama Alaska
  • 124. Arkansas Arizona Florida California Georgia Colorado Kentucky Hawaii Louisiana Idaho Mississippi Montana North Carolina Nevada Oklahoma New Mexico South Carolina Oregon Tennessee Utah Texas Washington Virginia Wyoming Census Region Codes Census region codes parallel CBS region codes with one exception: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, and West Virginia are coded as South, not Northeast. CBS News State Code List 01. Alabama 27. Montana 02. Alaska 28. Nebraska 03. Arizona 29. Nevada 04. Arkansas 30. New Hampshire 05. California 31. New Jersey 06. Colorado 32. New Mexico 07. Connecticut 33. New York 08. Delaware 34. North Carolina 09. District of Columbia 35. North Dakota 10. Florida 36. Ohio
  • 125. 11. Georgia 37. Oklahoma 12. Hawaii 38. Oregon 13. Idaho 39. Pennsylvania 14. Illinois 40. Rhode Island 15. Indiana 41. South Carolina 16. Iowa 42. South Dakota 17. Kansas 43. Tennessee 18. Kentucky 44. Texas 19. Louisiana 45. Utah 20. Maine 46. Vermont 21. Maryland 47. Virginia 22. Massachusetts 48. Washington 23. Michigan 49. West Virginia 24. Minnesota 50. Wisconsin 25. Mississippi 51. Wyoming 26. Missouri ICPSR 33962Terms of UseICPSR Processing NotesData Completeness ReportICPSR Variable Description and Frequencies AppendixCBS News and Census Region CodesCBS News State Codes Guidelines for Data Analysis Paper This detailed outline should assist you in writing your data analysis paper. It is not necessary that you stick to this outline exactly but use it as a guide. Each of the areas should be addressed, but depending on the topic, some papers will necessitate spending more time in some areas rather than others. You are graded on the following: Grammar Is the paper well written and free of errors? Is the paper properly cited? Completeness Did you review 5 relevant articles? Did you discuss all areas listed below?
  • 126. Understanding Results Do you understand the output from SPSS? Did you use the most relevant statistical test for your data? Did you explain your results? 1. Describe what the topic is and why it is interesting and worthy of research (approx. 1 page) This is done in the introduction and the beginning paragraphs of your paper. Your hypothesis should concern an interesting and important question. a. Explain why this is an important topic, one worth studying. b. Do this in your introduction to catch your reader’s attention. 2. Review the relevant literature (approx 2-3 pages) Once you have compiled 5 articles, create a summary of what others have found about your question. These sources should be scholarly in nature, from books and academic journals. “Scholarly” excludes newspaper articles, magazine articles, and websites. These can be used, but they are extra sources. a. Demonstrate your familiarity and knowledge of other important studies that inform your research question. b. Compare and contrast theoretical approaches for explaining your particular research question. c. If relevant, discuss how others have defined variables of interest. 3. Research Methods (approx. 3-4 pages) a. Identify and explain your research question and
  • 127. hypothesis 1. Spell out the particular research question that guides your study. 2. Identify the hypothesis that enables you to answer your research question, and be sure to specify both your independent and dependent variables. 3. Explain how you will measure your variables: Provide operational definitions for your IV, DV and control variables. 4. Discuss the reliability and validity of your measures. b. Data Explain what specific data collection technique or techniques was used to carry out your research. Most of you will use one of the survey provided but you must also consider the following: What other method could you use? Are there any better ones? Discuss the sample in the survey (in the codebook) Specify the questions used (in the codebook) Identify your unit of analysis (i.e. who or what should be observed, surveyed, interviewed, etc) If necessary, discuss any particular problems with the sample. 4. Results (approx 2 pages, tables do not count)
  • 128. Run the appropriate statistics and present the results in a way that makes sense. You must include relevant tables from SPSS. You must explain the results. If they are not as you would expect, state why that might be and offer an alternative explanation/hypothesis. 5. List of Sources (last page) Make sure you have a works cited list and properly cite these sources throughout the paper. If you do not properly cite you will end up with a failing grade.