The Pros And Cons Of Mutual Assured Destruction

The Pros And Cons Of Mutual Assured Destruction
Both, the United States and the Soviet Union, developed a capability to launch a devastating attacks
through submarines even after sustaining a full attack from their opponents. This policy became
known as Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) both the United States and the Soviet Union knew
that an attack upon the other would be catastrophic to themselves in theory restraining themselves
from attacking the other. The risks brought by the use of these weapons was so horrible that they
refrained from using their nuclear weapons. Both sides did not know capacity of the enemy's arsenal
being an arms race in wish the country with the biggest gun or largest arsenal is the victor not
knowing the exact capabilities of your adversary led to a massive production ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Navigation, for example submarines used the satellites to improve the targeting accuracy of their
warheads. So what happened during the end of the Cold War? Does the arms race end? During the
mid–1980s, the United States and the Soviet Union's relations improved, Mikhail Gorbachev
assumed power of the Soviet Union and announced a new era of restructuring and openness.
Gorbachev proposed a ½ reduction of nuclear weapons for both the United States and Soviet Union.
However, the proposal was refused. But the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty signed in
Washington on December 8, 1987 eliminated an entire class of nuclear weapons Due to the
economic and social changes occurring in the Soviet Union many of its republics began to declare
their independence. Because of this the Soviet Union was unable to impose its will on its satellite
states and so its influence slowly diminished. In December of 1991, all of the Soviet Union's
republics had declared independence. By December 25 the Soviet Union was declared non–existent
thus ending the arms race of the cold war. But of course history has a tendency to repeat its self and
new tensions with Russia and the United States continue to immerge an yet again both countries
have begun their demonstration of power though combined military exercises and provocations both
military's are constantly looking to improve their military technology's and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Mutual Assured Destruction Essay
The theory of Mutual Assured Destruction describes the idea that neither country would use nuclear
weapons as long as they knew that the other country could retaliate. The theory ultimately lead to
the arms race, and was able to continue as the number of nuclear weapons continued to build up.
The theory, which was later deemed MAD, had effects on both the arms race, and way people
reacted to the Cold War. The presence of atomic weapons for both the U.S. and the Soviet Union
resulted in the theory of mutual assured destruction, which effectively kept the two nations from
entering into war.
The term "Mutual Assured Destruction" was created when the Soviet Union began to become equal
with the United States in terms of nuclear weapons. The theory ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In particular, in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty of 1968, each side agreed that they would not
share nuclear weapon technology with countries that did not have any (Mutual Assured
Destruction). It separated the world into two sides: nations who has nuclear bombs, and ones who do
not. The countries without nuclear bombs who signed the treaty could not develop them and it
stopped the growth of nuclear weapons in those countries. Later in May of 1972 the two nations
agreed by treaty to a five year agreement to stop the production of nuclear weapons. With the
reduction of nuclear weapons, the arms race eventually came to an end, making the theory of Mutual
Assured Destruction irrelevant

How Is Technology Used In Miller's War?
Science and technology has often created undesirable situations, which would have escalated the
modern–day crisis that mirrors of those described by Miller. Furthermore the idea Miller presented
in his novel, showed that his ideas were stemmed from the Romanticism Period; as his idea for the
growth of civilization due technoscience is not possible . He effectively portrayed his idea in the
novel, as society advanced in technology it led to end of the societies, in two eras of modernization.
During World War II, the U.S created the first nuclear weapons and was utilized in the war, as two
atomic bombs were dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This event provided a glimpse on how
Miller's global crisis would look like as portrayed in the novel, "There was great deserts where once
life was, and in those places of the Earth where men still lived, all were sickened by the poisoned
air..." . ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This event would parallel the "Flame Deluge or Nuclear Holocaust" in the Miller's novel. However,
through mutual cooperation of both nations, this catastrophic event was evaded and better measures
for nuclear weapons was taken in account. It demonstrates technological advancement can be
utilized for warfare purposes. The piece history confirmed the ideas presented by Langdon Winner,
"...technologies can be used in ways that enhance the power, authority, and privilege of some over
other..." Winner emphasizes the notion of power is closely linked to the idea of science and
technology within society. Personally, if a nuclear crisis occurs in the near–future, it would be
contributed to nation's struggle for power and superiority over the entire globe. Even though the
facts present demonstrates how society can eventual lead to its own destruction that parallels in
Miller's novel, science and technology have left far–reaching effects on other current contemporary
global

Mutually Assured Destruction Concept
Analyzing the concept of M.A.D.
In a world that is capable to destroy itself, thinking about a nuclear war is probably one of the most
disheartening feelings a person can feel and this is due to the fact that it is a reality, meaning nuclear
war can happen at any time. The world today has progressed so far in technology that now, nuclear
devices are far more powerful than the two atomic bombs dropped on the two Japanese cities in
1945, which caused mass destruction. That being said, it is extremely important for the world to
keep nuclear stability, merely to avoid an event similar to Japans in 1945. This is where the M.A.D.
doctrine comes in place, the Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine is where two countries are
employed in nuclear scaled ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although the doctrine did provide somewhat of a nuclear balance, it initially lead to the arms race
between the Soviets and he Americans. M.A.D. came into place a little while after the U.S. was no
longer the nuclear superpower in 1949. Due to the Soviets also becoming a nuclear superpower, the
new Cold War was seen as a scary time. Although American and Russia still have the biggest
stockpile today, more countries have felt the need to also acquire a nuclear deterrence for security
purposes. They may not have the capability to completely destroy another country, but definitely
have the capability of assuring mutual mass destruction regardless to who shoots first. With the U.S.
being the first to create the bomb as well as being the only country to have used it, I feel as part of a
global community the U.S. is more obligated than other countries to work on undoing this doctrine
and by that I mean the complete disbarment of nuclear weapons. As individuals, if we can all come
together to just support the disbarment of nuclear weapons, it could possibly put the world as we
know it on that path. Individuals coming together could possibly influence this creating a better,
safer

Three Approaches To Dealing With North Korea
I personally believe that all three approaches for negotiating with North Korea were inept foreign
policies. As all Bill Clinton's administration did was delay the nuclearizing of North Korea by
exchanging oil. Eventually, North Korea abandoned the agreement with Clinton's administration and
still gained economic aid while making the United States looking foolish. The Bush Administration
had the right idea about seeking a regime change, but underestimated North Koreas government
cohesion and failed to carry it out properly. Of the three approaches, Obama's method for dealing
with North Korea was the most incompetent. For the Obama administration just simply refused to
engage in any negotiations (strategic patience) until North Korea showed ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As a military invasion would be impossible because of what is known as Mutual Assured
Destruction. Ever since nuclear weapons were invented any nation that has obtained them has never
gone to war with another country that also has weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, the only
solution to the denuclearization of North Korea would be a regime change. For North Korea is the
most sanctioned country in the world and has remained defiant of denuclearization. Any more
sanctions (i.e. Obama's policy) is useless as they will never give into the world's demands.
Consequently, a regime change could occur from the military or a revolution from the peasants. This
could be achieved by using stealth bombers to drop propaganda pamphlets to the North Korean
Populous to incite a revolution. Once a Civil War or Coup de ta is instigated then have the U.S.
provide weapons to the opposing side of the current regime. Even if the Civil War or Coup De ta
fails the war could last several years. As a result, it should destabilize the nation and militarily
weaken it, which would reduce its nuclear arsenal in the

Use Of Satire In Dr Strangelove
The Stanley Kubrick film, Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb,
uses the rhetorical device of satire to raise the issue of the Soviet–American arms race throughout
the film. A satire uses humor, irony, and sarcasm to "expose and discredit vice or folly" (Merriam–
Webster, 2018). Mutually assured destruction was believed to be the end result of a nuclear war
between the two world powers and Kubrick's film pokes fun at this absurd conclusion. The Soviet–
American arms race was an intense time period in history that caused American citizens to fear for
their lives, but the film decides to satirize the issue to show audiences that it is absurd to believe that
it would ever come to down to complete annihilation of the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove, an ex–Nazi scientist counseling the President and the generals in the war room, having
a mechanical arm "with a mind of its own" (Manos, 1). The arm abruptly snapped into a Nazi salute
and Dr. Strangelove seemed to fight against his own arm that began to strangle him. The madness of
the nuclear arms race and the real danger of starting a world war is intensely ridiculed with such
foolishness.
In another scene of the film, the President of the United States made a phone call to the Russian
Premier to warn him about the nuclear bombers that cannot be recalled. During this phone call, the
two men quarreled over who was sorrier to the other about the pressing matter. As long as the two
men both know that they are both very sorry and it is nothing personal, everything is just fine–even
though millions of lives are about to be taken. This is a prime example of the dark humor utilized
throughout the movie.
The issue of the nuclear arms race between the Soviets and the Americans proved to be a dangerous
time for the people of that era. Americans feared for their lives because the thought of human
extinction seemed possible with the threat of a nuclear war. Dr. Strangelove mocks the people's fears
by using dark humor throughout the film. The movie depicts impending doom as a result of the Cold
War but because it is a satire, it makes the audience want to laugh at the

Atomic And Nuclear Bomb : Atomic Bomb
Atomic/Nuclear bomb The atomic bomb ended WWII when the United States dropped Fat Man and
Little Boy on the japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This is what started the arms race
known as the Cold War between the United States and Russia, the two major world superpowers left
after WWII. The effects of the massive arms race between the two countries still to this day affect
every citizen in the world due to the fact so many weapons of mass destruction were made some
were even lost. Along with this, come many groups such as ISIS and Al–Qaeda and even the country
of North Korea that seek to possess these bombs and or make their own to use for their own evil
intentions against the free world.The world has rested on the policy of M.A.D (mutual assured
destruction) for too long but with threat of suicidal extremists, this policy won't work any longer so
we must discard of our Metal Horsemen of the apocalypse and use nuclear energy for life instead of
death. In the twenty–first century the threat of nuclear war is still prominent but instead of the
U.S.S.R the threat is now centralized in the Middle East and North Korea. So instead of building
more bombs, as we did in the age of the red scare, we are now disarming them according to Sharon
Squassoni the Director and Senior Fellow of the Proliferation Prevention Program . But problems in
the middle east and with North Korea have caused us to keep a larger quantity on stand by. The
United States is taking preventative

Dr Strangelove Cold War
Dr. Strangelove is a comedy about the Cold War intended for a young adult or adult audience due to
the topic of the Cold War not being understood easily by children. The reason for creating this film
is for the comedic spin on a very serious historical event, making it truly a one of a kind movie. The
point that this director was trying to make was that anything could be seen as funny with the right
wording. This could be seen as controversial because war is not something that should be taken
lightly, but the way this movie was written was only exaggerating the Cold War and tweaking the
ending where everyone was doomed. This was a good strategy in making a movie in this style as
opposed to seemingly making fun of the Cold War and those involved. As I have stated before, the
main subject of this movie is the Cold War. I did have previous knowledge of this subject such as it
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove is a fantastic, must–see movie. The whole script is witty and well–written with lines
such as "Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" and "Well, I've been to one
world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of
earphones." Not only is the script amazing, but Peter Sellers acting is fantastic! He plays Mandrake,
President Muffley, and Dr. Strangelove, yet differentiates each character perfectly as to create the
illusion of three entirely different people. Every actor plays their part almost perfectly. The only
drawback of the entire movie would be when the ambassador of the Soviet Union started taking
pictures, there was an opportunity for more conflict, but that never went anywhere. It seemed almost
as if that scene wasn't supposed to make the final cut, seeing as it went nowhere. Besides that only
fatal flaw, Dr. Strangelove is incredible. I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone who
wants a fun comedy to watch. Its witty script and impeccable actors makes Dr. Strangelove a must–
see

Paradoxically Life Saving
On the morning of August 6th, 1945, 1900 feet above Hiroshima, Japan, one hundred forty pounds
of highly enriched uranium–235 collided with itself, triggering the first manmade nuclear explosion
ever detonated over a populated city ("Little Boy" 1). Seconds later, the lives of 70,000 men, women
and children were extinguished ("The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima" 6). Over the course of the
next several years the effects of radiation poisoning would kill an additional one hundred thirty
thousand people, making the first atomic bomb, nicknamed "little boy", the most devastating
weapon ever used by mankind – for an astonishingly short four days ("The Atomic Bombing of
Hiroshima" 6). On the morning of August 9th, 1945, another atomic bomb, more ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In comparison with the 14 million lives that could have been lost in a direct land invasion of Japan,
the two cities and several hundred thousand lives obliterated by the atomic bombs seem
insignificant. Some objections to the use of these weapons include unfounded claims that President
Truman, the President of the United States who assumed control after President Roosevelt died in
1945, wanted to use the bombs only to satisfy his own bloodlust, and the bloodlust of American
citizens. But the clear presentation of the facts involved with Operation Downfall, which President
Truman did have available to him at the time, should be enough to convince anyone of the almost
paradoxical life saving power of the atomic bombs. Among the many objections raised by opponents
of the use of the atomic bombs, one of the most difficult ones to substantiate is the claim that Japan
may have been coerced to surrender in other ways. Evidence for this claim includes the Russian
declaration of war against Japan on August 8th, 1945, the day before the use of the second bomb on
Nagasaki, and Japan's possible willingness to accept a conditional surrender (Gordin 5). Seeking not
only the surrender of Japan, but an expansion of their own territory, the Russians decided to commit
forces to an Eastern front. On August 8th Russian troops invaded Japanese occupied Manchuria,
which the Japanese had

The Debate Of Nuclear Weapons
The debate that nuclear weapons kept peace through mutually assured destruction is still quite
controversial. Though some historians do not believe this. Eric Hobsbawm states this, "both sides
thus found themselves committed to an insane arms race to mutual destruction." The interpretations
A, B, C, D both agree and disagree with this point and each historian has their on views.
Interpretation A and D disagreed with the question however also had a different view and since it
was more revisionist blamed America. On the other hand B and C saw nuclear weapons as a
deterrent and agreed with the question. However B state they knew about mutually assured
destruction. Interpretation A is from a historian who considers the reasons for the US attitude to
nuclear weapons. The interpretation by Hobsbawm shows that due to the Americanism ideology, the
anti –Red witch hunts and the victory of the communists in China the USA found its self
aggressively dealing with the issue. Therefore both sides were committed to an arms race due to
fear. Therefore Hobsbawm is stating that America was using nuclear weapons not as a nuclear
deterrent but as a threat against the USSR, to halt the spread of communism into the west. The
source is correct in bring up certain points that America did threaten other countries with nuclear
arms and did almost use them. An example of this very instance was during the Korean War when
General MacArthur went to ask president Truman if he could drop an A–bomb on

Chapter One: 1.4 Arguments and Explanations/ Page 24-26 Essay
Chapter One: 1.4 Arguments and Explanations/ Page 24–26
Exercises 10: This is essentially an argument. The author argues, "Love looks not with eyes but with
mind." However, Shakespeare primary argumentative claim is that true love is able to ignore
superficial beauty and appreciate the genuine value of a person. Thus, he believes that Cupid, being
the agent of love, is therefore blind to appearance. Cupid is often portrayed in art as wearing a
blindfold, "painted blind". Yet, the following passage contains some argument and has been
interpreted as argument. Therefore, the entire propositions preceding the first judgment and/ or
claim of the passage serve as premises.
Exercises 11: This is an explanation passage; the author explains the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The author explanation is basis in which the conclusion represents an accepted fact and the reason
represents a cause of the passage fact. Yet, the passage purpose is to help us understand how or why
that fact occurs. Thus, the author brings strong explanation, in fact, where it got him to the point
when he clarified that "the interesting of life can exist only in three dimensions. Due to all of the
interpretations of this proposition that be preceding the passage serve as a conclusion. Exercises 14:
This is an explanation passage: what is being explained is that translator and interpreters that have
helped the troop of USA is diplomats now and want to resettle in the USA. This explanation is
composed of two parts; one is the translator and interpreters want to resttle in the USA and second
are the USA does not have an adequate number of interpreters and translator whom want to
proficient in universal languages. By this passage, interpretations proposition that preceding the
serve as in a premise.
Exercise 15: This is essentially an explanation passage; the author explains the failure of treasury
department that design and issue paper currency that is with good grace evident to shade and
visually damage the human beings of violate. One might interpret the passage as more an argument
because he relies on stronger sources to support his claims in fact when the author mentioned no
disabled person is discrimination. Consequently, the entire

Comparison of the 1938 Munich Crisis and 1962 Cuban...
Comparison of the 1938 Munich Crisis and 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and the Role of Nuclear
Arms
Introduction
In annals of the 20th century, the Munich crisis of 1938 and the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 are
two of the more riveting examples of crisis diplomacy (Richardson 1994). Comparisons of the two
cases yield a robust discourse on their similarities and differences. The two cases illustrate the
complexity of international leadership through 'summit diplomacy' (Dobbs 2008; Faber 2008;
Reynolds 2008).
The outcomes of the two historic events are vastly different. For instance, the Munich crisis
eventually became a prelude to World War II that dragged Great Britain to war with Germany. The
Cuban Missile Crisis turned out to be ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1939, Hitler annexed the rest of Czechoslovakia in violation of the agreement. Germany also
invaded Poland and Hungary dragging Britain and France to World War II against it. Likewise, the
USSR discarded its pro–western policy and signed a Nazi–Soviet Pact.
Chamberlain's appeasement policy was derided by British as a failure (Reynolds, 37). Considering
that Hitler was deceptive, appeasement will never work. It may have been more strategic if the
purpose was to buy time while Britain was preparing for war. On hindsight, the one–year interim
period between the Munich agreement in 1938 to Britain's war in 1939 provided the opportunity for
Britain to boost its artillery before going to a crucial war in 1940 (Reynolds, 93).
1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
The thirteen days of October 1962 is considered to have no parallel in the history of mankind. It is
regarded as the moment when the world came too close to the fringes of nuclear Armageddon
(Allison and Zelikow, 1). The Cuban Missile Crisis was a confrontation involving the two
ideologically–opposed nuclear superpowers – the United States and the Soviet Union– over Cuba
set in the Cold War era. The crisis escalated when the US took photographs of Soviet missile bases
secretly being built in Cuba. These bases stock piled a number of medium–and–intermediate–range
ballistic nuclear missiles pointed to the US.
The US favored militarily 'quarantine' by blocking Soviet

Conflict In Lord Of The Flies Essay
War is the state of conflict and competition between opposing forces. Nonetheless, war can be
caused through emotional and psychological issues through two sides that obtain power from the
support of influential followers. William Golding exhibits this perception in the novel, Lord of the
Flies as a plane carrying a group of British schoolboys is shot down over the Pacific during a
combat warfare in Europe. In the midst of consternation and chaos, Ralph, one of the many young
boys on the plane, is able to distinguish the fear among the boys and use them as a barrier to
survival. Ralph's leadership is visible from the beginning as he is elected leader of the boys, on the
other hand, Jack is cheated out of becoming the leader as he resembles a militaristic attitude who is
greedy to make rules and discipline anyone for breaking his rules. A component of the novel
consists of Ralph and Jack struggling to invest in each others distinct power leading to the boys
descending into savagery and the loss of civilization during the events of the atomic war. Through
the background of the atomic war, Golding demonstrates the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
After Ralph is inducted as the true leader, Jack branches himself of from the group with his
militaristic authority power from Ralph's democracy power showing the similarities of the
democracy East versus the communist West. Consequently, war is used to refer to a threatening
situation of instability rather than two sides of power fighting to win. When one separates itself from
a group, the leader and its followers have to be alert of its own power and the other groups power
that can uncover the descendance of savagery and civilization. Conceding that war is a state of
conflict, it is a group's responsibility to hold accountable for its actions of others as a result from its
everlasting

Deterrence During The Cold War
The concepts associated with the classical nuclear strategy during the Cold War was effective in
preventing a nuclear exchange between the U.S. and Soviet Union. Mutual assured destruction
provided the incentive for both countries to avoid direct conflict. Classic deterrence strategy is not
relevant against modern non–state threats and cannot successfully deter non–state actors. There is no
standard definition of deterrence. Scholars offer differing meanings and concepts but all agree on the
common assumption that "deterrence is successful as long as aggression does not take place." The
essence of deterrence is that the threat of harm prevents an adversary from doing something. It is
achieved when an adversary practices restraint ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These concepts were focused on preventing direct conflict between the established superpowers of
the United States and the Soviet Union. It was a well–defined approach used by rational actors that
contained critical elements of success. "Credibility is central to any deterrence threat." Effectiveness
depended on the accurate communication of credible threats against each other's national interest.
Success depended on the belief that each country was willing and able to carrying out the stated
threat which had to be communicated "early, clearly and publicly." Declarative statements by each
nation established "red lines" and provided a clear understanding of what would provoke a forceful
response. Classical deterrence prevented a nuclear exchange between America and the Soviet Union
because both nations had well defined interests, they effectively communicated their intentions and
both were willing and able to use the credible threat of mutual assured destruction. This strategy of
"deterrence by punishment" made the cost of using nuclear weapons excessive in comparison to the
benefit. This strategy cannot be applied successfully against today's non–state

Dr. Strangelove: Movie Analysis
Dr. Strangelove is one of the many masterpieces made by the great Stanley Kubrick. The movie was
made in 1964 at the Shepperton Studios in London, UK. The time the movie was made is of great
importance, in fact, it was made only two years after the Cuban Missile Crisis. Kubrick pictures, in
an extremely comical yet somewhat serious way, what the world would look like after one of the
two forces (U.S vs. USSR) was triggered in initializing nuclear warfare.
General Jack Ripper is an obsessively paranoid, crazy, right–wing commander that deeply believes
in the idea that the Russians have been fluoridating the water Americans have been consuming in
order to affect their "preciously body fluids". For this reason, he deems necessary to intervene and
stop such action. This is achieved by sending a nuclear attack on Russia, Ripper uses his position of
Air Force General to create such an attack that cannot be reversed by the politicians in D.C., leaving
them only the choice of either fully committing to the attack or trying to resist to Russia's retaliation.
Ripper closes off any contact with the base and orders the soldiers at the base to fire at anybody who
tries to get into the base. In the meantime, word gets to Washington and the main figures of the
country, including the President, meet in the War ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove is black comedy in its purest form and the director achieves this by following a very
unique yet effective style, in this style, we can find plenty of components that make this movie of
the greatest Hollywood movies ever made.
First, the mise–en–scène is fundamental. This can be noted when we look at the first shots of the Air
Force base from where General Ripper will send his attack, everything is there for a reason. The
billboard saying "Peace is Our Profession" is a clear joke given the actions of the General. The
mise–en–scene is a tool given to the audience to help them understand the perspective of the movie
from Kubrick's very point of

Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to...
Stanley Kubrick's 1964 film Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the
Bomb presents a satire of the Cold War and nuclear warfare. The film stars comedian Peter Sellers
in three different roles, including the president, a Royal Air Force officer, and the title character of
Dr. Strangelove–a character who does not play a major role in the action until the final scene of the
film. The film itself was adapted by Stanley Kubrick, Peter George, and Terry Southern from
George's thriller novel Red Alert and was originally intended to be a drama, but was made into a
satirical black comedy in the writing process (Webster 33). In the final scene, the leaders of the
American government are gathered in the War Room awaiting ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Additionally, he combines pathos and logos in addressing the president's fear of deciding who would
be taken into the mine shafts by saying that a computer would be necessary to make this decision.
Despite all the scientific reasoning in his argument, what seems to be very effective in the argument
is the strong appeal of the sex ratio of ten women–who have been chosen for their "highly
stimulating sexual appeal"–to every one man. He presents this argument in a very logical and
unassuming sense, saying that it will be a "sacrifice" and referring to the sexual acts as a form of
"service". This pathos–based argument of sexual interest is what causes General Turgidson to start
arguing for the use of these mine shafts.
General Turgidson's argument relies far more on strategic thinking from the "military point of view"
that emotionally appeals with pathos to the president using Cold War tensions and this new "mine
shaft race". He begins his argument in a lower register talking directly talking to the president,
appealing to his fear of further Soviet–United States clashes that could spring up after they emerge
from the mine shafts, which was brought to his attention after the Soviet ambassador compliments
Dr. Strangelove on his idea for human survival. His use of slang with the word "Ruskies" ties
directly into the fear of Soviet dominance over America. This also points to General Turgidson's
strong

John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Speech After World War II
The inaugural speech of the newly elected American President John F. Kennedy address to the
newly independent countries from all over the world. Bu most importantly President Kennedy
addresses to the Soviet Union leaders, since the world was divided into blocks facing each other.
The Cold War shaped the world after the WWII, so as a logical first speech of the new President of
one the most powerful nations on earth is to try to show his vision of the world.
The reason of President Kennedy's speech is related to the start of WWII which aim at worldwide
domination. Nazi Germany wanting to restore its place among the great nations of Europe and the
world became more demanding. The other European countries not willing to share the territory that
they acquired in Africa, South America, and Asia gave the Nazis an excuse to declare war to every
nations that will oppose them in their conquest of the world. Germany invaded and occupied most
Europe; however, when the US entered the war brought, it brought hope to the last Western
European country resisting the Nazis. On the other hand, the Soviet Union was resisting the invasion
of the Nazis on East Europe. Briefly, The Nazis lost the war and Europe was divided between the
US and its allies and Soviet Union and its satellites countries. President Kennedy addresses three
different audiences. The first audience is the american people. He reminds them of the values that
makes America and why they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Kennedy, i understood why he was one the popular president his time. Hi view of the world was a
breath of hope. He was the right man for those critical times, a man that was seeking dialogue
between two superpowers. His stance to promote dialogue and peace for the world have probably
cost him his life. In conclusion, this speech has made understand better the approach of President
Kennedy of an imminent threat that the US has faced in all its

War in the Nuclear Era
Addressing the question of whether war is a rational decision or a mistake is important to understand
the causes of war and explain the reduction in the number of wars fought among countries in today's
nuclear era. The argument, under which war is a mistake, is a normative claim about what action
states should have chosen, based on the outcomes that have been produced. That is, for a decision to
be good, it needs to have produced the actor's preferred outcome. However, the mistake perspective
is problematic under the uncertainty and competitiveness of the anarchic international political
system.
The rational theory provides a better alternative. In this paper, the rational theory of war will unfold
by beginning with an understanding of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
States pay attention to the long term as well as the immediate consequences of their actions.
Therefore, the value of going to war is the outcome for which a state would settle through
bargaining. Thus, for any deal to prevent war, each state must decide that they prefer the deal to
fighting a war. Mistake advocators will be quick to point out that the utility–maximizing perspective
might be problematic since the theory does not include uncertainty in its evaluation of costs and
benefits. However, accepting this criticism will not undermine the rational perspective. The utility–
maximizing theory is only the simplified first step in assessing the rationality of a state decision to
fight a war.
That being said, this vision of rationality accounts in part for the reduction in the number of wars
fought between countries now compared to the past. Nuclear technology and mutually assured
destruction have elevated the cost of war to such an extent that it is now almost impossible for the
benefits to outweigh the costs of nuclear warfare. Thus, the main interest in security has shifted the
rational utility–maximizing states' policy from winning to avoiding wars.
Rationality and relative power: Balance, stability and security
Today's 'balanced multi polarity', stabilized by nuclear technology, makes international relations
more secure

Causes of the Cuban Missile Crisis
The Cuban Missile Crisis was one of the most pressured filled moments in the history of the United
States. Furthermore, the actins that took place that day would have not have just effected the United
States and the Soviet Union but the entire war. The U.S. and Soviet Union the resident two
superpowers of the time were on the verge of all out nuclear war. That potential war would have
murdered tens of thousands of people within the first couple days. Furthermore, the nuclear fallout
from a war of that magnitude would hurt many generations to come. The fallout from the war would
have major lasting effects for years to come. Thankfully, the actions taken that day by both the
United States and Soviet Union were not disastrous. The actions taken that day resulted in a peaceful
resolution that saw both countries; lessen their threat towards each other. The Cuban Missile Crisis
was a moment of great pressures but the question is why did it ever come to that. The crisis did not
just occur there were reasons for why that event took place. Ultimately the Cuban Missile Crisis
occurred because of the Manhattan Engineering Department (MED), Mutual Assured Deterrence
(MAD), Missile Gap, Strategic Air Command (SAC), and the Bay of Pigs. These five entities were
necessary for the Cuban Missile Crisis to be necessary.
The Manhattan Engineering Department (MED) also known as the Manhattan Project has had a
huge impact on why the Missile Crisis occurred. MED was commissioned to see if the

Mad Max Fury Road : Film Directed By George Miller And...
The world is now barren and dead. Insane cults control the world and one must fight to survive. This
is the world of Mad Max Fury Road; a film directed by George Miller and stars Tom Hardy as the
titular Max and Charlize Theron as the imposing Furiosa. The film was released on May 15th 2015
and opened to rave reviews from various sources (Rotten Tomatoes). Brian Tallerico of
RogerEbert.com states that, "[the movie] vibrates with the energy of a veteran filmmaker working at
the top of his game (RogerEbert.com)". Of all the elements, the setting elevates the movie to a
greater level. Not only does Miller utilize this setting to highlight the various themes of the film, but
he also uses this setting to drive the tension of the film. Though never explicitly stated, the post–
apocalyptic nature of the world had developed due to the exhaustion of natural resources that may
have led to a large scale nuclear war. This is highlighted by the value the characters had played for
water, the dusty environment of the film, and the psychological trauma exhibited by various
characters. The paper aims to evaluate the various factors that contributed towards the dilapidated
setting of Mad Max: Fury Road. The first factor that showcases the cause for the apocalyptic nature
of the film is the exhaustion of water in the Mad Max universe. This is illustrated by the obsession
the populace has for water. This is obsession is displayed by the main antagonist: Immortan Joe,
who successfully controls a

Kubbrick's Theory Of Brinksmanship
An alternate title for Kubrick's film was Dr. Doomsday or: How to Start World War III Without
Even Trying. A title bluntly stating what the actual title infers – that America and the Soviet Union
had both taken brinksmanship way too far, and were both one slip of the hand away from killing off
the entire human race. By portraying the film in a very comedic fashion, Kubrick was able to show
just how ridiculous it was that we allowed the nuclear clock to come only one minute from
midnight.
Imagine two men playing chicken – both driving as fast as they can (obviously in muscle cars) set
on a collision course for each other. This encapsulates the theory of brinksmanship, or trying to
achieve an advantageous outcome by pushing dangerous events to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove is the commentary between General Turgidson and President Muffley. In one line
Turgidson says to Muffley, "Mr. President, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed. But I do
say... no more than ten to twenty million killed, tops." In this scene, General Turgidson is trying,
unsuccessfully, to convince President Muffley to send all of his nuclear arsenal following the plane
sent by General Ripper. To which President Muffley naturally responds, "I will not go down in
history as the greatest mass murderer since Adolf Hitler!" If you have seen the movie, you know that
Turgidson delivers these lines in an optimistic, bordering on giddy tone. Moreover, Turgidson's tone
not only exemplifies the absurdity of the whole situation, but also brings up a very interesting point
about the power of a nuclear bomb. Calling ten to twenty million people dead "acceptable losses" is
pretty unbelievable when re–examined. That's one third of the total lives lost in WWII in the blink
of an eye. Really, the only reason ten to twenty million dead could ever be considered "acceptable,"
is when you are dealing with nuclear warfare – something easily capable of wiping all life from the
face of the earth. This comical commentary between Turgidson and Muffley shows just how abstract
the idea of killing that many people must have been to our leaders, and just how distanced from their
constituents

Compare And Contrast Pakistan And Cold War Essay
Pakistan and India, the two rival states in the dense populated south Asian region engaged in
sophisticated arm race just after in short time of their independence. Both of the nations in the
shadow of two different ideologies have bitter relations and the outcome of bitter relation is always
ended in the deadly arm conflicts. Pakistan and India the two infant states were born in the
beginning of the cold war just after the end of World War II. Pakistan joined the western block
against the Soviet State to ensure her existence in the survival race with its rival state India. India
was economically well off state and had reliable resources and forces. Pakistan succeeded in
acquiring the membership of SEATO and CENTO to meet its defense needs. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The strike will be truly workable and credible deterrence that could be able to maintain the nuclear
deterrence posture in the future realm. India is developing the system to carry out the disarming the
strike against Pakistan. The statements were given by MIT scholar Vipin Narang and other Indian
top officials. The Indian strategic thoughts aiming disarming and demolishing Pakistan's first strike
nuclear attack arsenal and then a destructive massive attack from India will be done to accomplish
the task of completely destruction of Pakistan's nuclear assets, sites, dams, power stations,
population, public infrastructure and industrial zones. Zameer Akram added more the statement in a
seminar was held Geneva organized by Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) that's called Indian
preemptive strike. To have the second–strike capability considers the sustainability of full spectrum
deterrence from Pakistan. India's declared "no first use policy" matters in the rejection of Pakistan's
first use policy. Pakistan needs the assured and precise second–strike capability due to India's
growing military expenditure and rapidly increasing military conventional and non–conventional
hardware were acquired by India from USA and Russia. The main concern in a nuclear deterrence is
the India's acquisition of ballistic missile defense.

David and Goliath Analysis Essay
"David and Goliath Analysis" In the story David and Goliath there is a great lesson to be learned.
The story shows that you should never underestimate your opponent and be prepared for anything.
David's own intellect and knowledge of his own abilities enabled him to become the smaller, but
stronger opponent. It all comes down to who is the better leader. David was a young shepherd boy
who watched over the sheep while feeding and keeping them safe from the lions and bears. While
watching the sheep David would spend many moments speaking to God and playing a harp. David's
brothers were at the battlefield and one day he was "sent to the battle lines by his father to bring
back news of his brothers." (Fairchild, 2012) David was not afraid ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Goliath laughs at the size of David while David is confident with God by his side. David then uses
his sling–shot to launch a stone at Goliath's head which knocks him down on his face. The giant fell
allowing David to take his sword and behead Goliath with it. David took advantage of Goliaths
mistakes. He underestimated David's ability and failed to move out of the way of the rock. If you are
prepared for all obstacles and keep an open mind you are more likely to come out victorious.
David's own intellect and knowledge of his own abilities made Goliath the smaller, but stronger
opponent. This story can be related to the difference between WW1 and WW2. During WW1 trench
warfare was used. Trench warfare is a ditch dug out of the ground to give troops protection from the
enemies. The soldiers used machine guns, mustard and chlorine gases and smokeless gunpowder to
ward off the enemy. Machine guns were the main weapons used by soldiers. However "they needed
4–6 men to man them" (Tasker, 2012) and had to be positioned on a flat surfaces. When the mustard
and chlorine gases were released the soldiers had to take great precaution to not breathe it in because
the result is immediate death. These trenches also carried many diseases and rats making it a harsh
condition for soldiers. By the time of WW2 also known as the "Cold War" the atomic bomb was
invented. The atomic bomb has the ability to take out an entire city. Russia and the U.S. achieve
nuclear equality

This Historical Study Will Define The Dual Hostility Of
This historical study will define the dual hostility of the Soviet Union and the United States in the
instigation and resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. The nuclear arms race of the early
1960s defined a period of history in which a stalemate occurred between superpowers. The United
States and the Soviet Union were continually seeking to build larger nuclear arsenals and to also
expand their territorial influence over lesser nations. The Cuban Missile Crisis defines also defines
the minor role of Cuba that served to facilitate the expansion of communist influence on the eastern
seaboard to the United States. In this manner, Cuba could not be blamed for being a pawn in the
Soviet plan to move missiles 90 miles off the coast of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It assumed the use of multiple and powerful nuclear weapons by both sides in the Cold War,
resulting in reciprocal total annihilation.
This strategic perspective defined the logical outcome of a nuclear war between two major powers,
which would result in the destruction of both sides of the conflict. Therefore, the U.S. and the
Soviets would lose in the case of a nuclear war, which laid the foundation for the Cold War and the
political conflicts that followed. This aspect of a "cold war" defines the ideological expansion of
communism and capitalist ideology, which would now compete for world domination. By not being
able to actually initiate a "hot war" between the two superpowers, it became apparent that
clandestine spy networks and the movement of nuclear arsenals would set the stage for the Cuban
Missile Crisis in 1962.
The Soviet Union played an important role in bringing nuclear missiles to Castro's Cuba in 1962,
but it should also be mentioned in the context of the overreaching Cold War with the United States.
In a broader context of the Cold War, the United States has presaged the Cuban Missile Crisis by
President Kennedy's placement of nuclear missiles on the border of Turkey and Italy, which was
perceived as a threat by Soviet leader, Nikita Khrushchev,. These events took place in 1961, which
could be perceived as a cause for the movement of nuclear missiles by the Soviets to Cuba in 1962.
Overall, it was also evident that the Soviets and the U.S.

Nuclear Weapons As a Defense Mechanism
Nuclear weapons are the safest defense mechanism in the world. Although nuclear weapons can lead
to mass destruction and the loss of thousands of lives when detonated, they are the optimal solution
to the conflicts between countries in the future. The actual use of the nuclear weapon is not the
deterrent, but rather just the mere fact that a country could use it against another country which
avoids the large scale conflict. Thus, nuclear deterrence presents itself as a preferred security option.
Firstly, based on deterrence theory, nuclear weapons will lead to Mutual Assured Destruction
(MAD). This means that if nuclear weapons are used in warfare, either side will not be able to
succeed in winning, as the destruction caused by the weapons ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Thus, it is clear that fear is the primary driving force behind nuclear deterrence. The Oxford
dictionary defines fear as an unpleasant emotion caused by the threat of danger, pain or harm; this
"unpleasant emotion is the only thing which stands between total destruction and peace. When
conflicts occur between countries, nuclear deterrence is the ultimate resolution. The country with
fewer nuclear weapons will have to end their efforts in sustaining the conflict, resolving the issue.
No matter how many nuclear weapons are created, based on deterrence theory, they will never be
used due to the fear of mutually assured destruction. Therefore, the advantage of nuclear deterrence
is that it is expected to result in a tense but stable global peace (Mutual assured destruction, 2014).
The only use of nuclear weapons in warfare was during World War II. At the end of World War II,
the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, one in Hiroshima and the other in Nagasaki.
The devastation from these bombs was immense. There were an estimated 225,000 casualties as a
result of the atomic bombs (Yamazaki, n.d.). An astounding number of people were crushed in their
homes and in the buildings in which they were working (Yamazaki, n.d.). "Their skeletons could be
seen in the debris and ashes for almost 1,500 meters from the center of the blast, particularly in the
downwind directions" (Yamazaki, n.d.).

1980s Political Culture: The Cold War and Mutual Assured...
1980s Political Culture: The Cold War and Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) 1980s Political
Culture Figure 1. Nena, "99 Luftballons" (1983) / "99 Red Balloons" (1984) A dance–rock protest
song from West Germany, during the Cold War partition of Germany. The song describes a nuclear
war starting because of misinterpreted signals from a bunch of balloons. Audio available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEWHItzvQHk Lyrics: You and I in a little toy shop Buy a bag
of balloons with the money we've got. Set them free at the break of dawn 'Til one by one, they were
gone. Back at base, bugs in the software Flash the message, Something's out there. Floating in the
summer sky. 99 red balloons go by. 99 red balloons. floating in the summer sky. Panic bells, it's red
alert. There's something here from somewhere else. The war machine springs to life. Opens up one
eager eye. Focusing it on the sky. Where 99 red balloons go by. 99 Decision Street. 99 ministers
meet. To worry, worry, super–scurry. Call the troops out in a hurry. This is what we've waited for.
This is it boys, this is war. The president is on the line As 99 red balloons go by. 99 Knights of the
air Ride super–high–tech jet fighters Everyone's a superhero. Everyone's a Captain Kirk. With
orders to identify. To clarify and classify. Scramble in the summer sky. As 99 red balloons go by. 99
dreams I have had. In every one a red balloon. It's all

Mutually Assured Destruction: in Theory and Practice
By definition Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) is a doctrine of military strategy in which full–
scale use of nuclear weapons by both sides would effectively result in the destruction of both side. It
is not a complicated concept. An elementary school child could understand that the two biggest kids
in the class don't openly brawl because both would suffer unacceptable damage as well as put third
parties in the danger of the crossfire. The concept of MAD is not the complicated part; it is
everything else that pertains to it that has baffled policy makers and theorists for generations.
Mutually Assured Destruction is a complex but precarious balance that dominated the Cold War Era.
The stability can easily be disrupted by actions taken by ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Credited with first use of the phrase "assured destruction", McNamara did much to outline the
dilemma that both the United States and the United Soviet Socialist Republic faced. Secretary
McNamara proved to be highly influential on the Cold War, such as the Kennedy Administration
actions on the Bay of Pigs Operation, (although it ended up backfired on the Administration). He
was also a member of the Executive Committee of the National Security Counsel that advised
President Kennedy on the Cuban Missile Crisis. He is famous for his Athens and Ann Arbor
speeches in Greece and Michigan respectfully, which suggested picking military targets rather than
cities, as well as "indivisibility of control" which stressed a united nuclear deterrent against the
communist forces. The idea of a change in targets was however dropped when it was realized how
difficult it would be to make it an effective strategy. 9
Central to the employment of mutually assured destruction as a military doctrine is a belief that
neither side would attack for it would ensure its own death. This delicate balance exists only while
conditions remain stable. Different actions each side takes in the conflict effect the stability in
different and often unexpected ways. How it effects the stability depends on the perception each
country takes. One action intended by one country to help

A Poor Allocation Of Our Nation 's Time And Resources
23.7%. That is how many of 600 randomly surveyed students and staff in an independent study at
PNHS said they "Strongly Agree" that their household is generally prepared for disasters (Witek,
Figure 1). In the modern world, everyday citizens live under constant, and generally ignored, threats
like those of nuclear warfare, international terrorism, cyber attacks, natural disasters, and other
large–scale crises. While we go about our daily lives, these potential events linger and yet the
average US citizen stands under–prepared or entirely unprepared for these harsh realities. Despite
this shocking fact, the US Government continues to focus on defending the country rather than
preparing its population. This document will argue as to why this is a poor allocation of our nation's
time and resources and why programs like Civil Defense, popular and commonplace during the
Cold War, should be brought back into the picture for the preservation of the nation and its people.
Our nation and its population should be educated, prepared and exercised for the harsh realities of
the modern world. Along the lines of large–scale disasters, there are nearly infinite scenarios where
things can go horribly wrong in a matter of minutes and hours, as opposed to months and years.
Nuclear war lingers between the US and North Korea (McConnell/Todd), the tension between
Russia and the US remains higher than ever (Khanal), and revived disputes between India and
Pakistan threaten to ignite warfare

Dr Strangelove Themes
The Cold War was a period from 1947 to 1991 that adhered erratic tension and constant threat of
nuclear conflict between the two remaining superpowers that emerged from WWII, the U.S. and the
Soviet Union. The 1964 film Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the
Bomb, directed by Stanley Kubrick, depicts the overlying themes of the Cold War in a comedic
fashion. This film's full embodiment of the Cold War is seen through its representation of the time
period, and the sheer competitiveness between the United States and Russia. Additionally, due to
many of Kubrick's movie decisions, the film has helped society acknowledge and understand the
pure absurdity that the topic of nuclear destruction holds. In Dr. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
General alone goes rogue and sends the missiles toward Russia. This puts the U.S. President in an
immensely tight scenario.
The film delves into some of the difficult options leaders have to choose from in cases involving
nuclear weapons. Nuclear conflicts are extraordinarily complex, with many potential unpredictable
outcomes. After General Ripper directs his plane to bomb the enemy, he describes his thought
process to one of his officers, "...when [the president's advisors] realize there is no possibility in
recalling the wing there will be only one course of action: open, total commitment". Here, a "total
commitment" consists of the U.S. supporting General Ripper's plan by utilizing their full arsenal of
nuclear weapons to attack Russia. General "Buck" Turgidson, one of the President's top advisors,
echoes this exact idea in the war room and proposes to the U.S. President a full commitment. This
was a possible solution that could have neutralized all of Russia in one wave of nuclear missiles;
however, this strategy is frowned upon and dismissed by the President as it would reflect poorly on
the U.S.' diplomatic reputation in the long–run.
An aspect of the Cold War that Kubrick focuses on is the blatant lack of trust between the
conflicting nations. In a scene where a Russian Ambassador is being brought into the war room by
the U.S. President to help determine a mutual solution,

Essay on DBQ: Cold War
A war does not necessarily require a physical weapon to fight. From 1947 to 1991, military tension
and ideological conflicts held place. Cold War is defined as a state of political hostility existing
between countries, characterized by threats, violent propaganda, subversive activities, and other
measures short of open warfare, in particular. The causes of the cold war between United States and
the Soviet Union were the mutual distrust that had taken place in World War II, intense rivalry
between the two super powers, and conflicting ideologies. The two superpowers differed in views of
political and economic principles and were eager to spread their ideologies to many countries.
United States were in favor of democracy and capitalism while ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There is a part in the excerpt from a speech by Nikita Khrushchev that informs about the actions of
U.S. developing an "anti–communism" slogan (Document 6). The two superpowers were definitely
afraid of the other nation increasing in power and influence. They were both eager to spread and
emphasize their own ideology and boost their national self–esteem, but also were desperate to
denounce the opposing ideology and seek for opportunities to restrain the other power's influence.
Such slogans in U.S. were created for the sake of containment. Containment is defined as the action
or policy of preventing the expansion of a hostile country or influence which was the USSR in Cold
War seen from the perspective of U.S. Economic aid for nations, especially Europe, was another
weapon used to fight the war. After World War II, most of European countries were in a desperate
situation. They suffered in poverty, hunger, and disease. Improved technology and the development
of explosives with massive powers led to the devastation of Europe. Approximately 36 million
European men have died in World War II. Not only did the population decrease, infrastructure had to
be reconstructed and it required tremendous amount of reparation. As the European countries were
weakened economically and militarily, they were desperate and more likely to rather fall into and be
attracted to the Soviet Union's communism than United States' democracy. United

Persuasive Essay On Aliens
The Alien in our thoughts
If aliens came to take over the earth and threaten humanity, country leaders from across the globe
would come together and not fight from a perspective of saving their own people; but all people;
otherwise, homo–sapiens would seize to exist. Money and resources would no longer be tied to
nationalistic interests; but to the interest of furthering humanity. Unfortunately, there are aliens
threatening humanity, but the aliens endangering the world and its peoples aren't a foreign species
from outer space; the alien is configured in the global means of thinking and acting regarding
foreign policy.
Differences in prosperity across the globe are stunning. To elaborate, the GDP per capita in Somalia
is 434.21 USD, while the United States' GPD is 57,466.79 USD (World Bank). In October 1970, the
UN General Assembly adopted a resolution including the goal that: "Each economically advanced
country will progressively increase its official development assistance [...] and will exert its best
efforts to reach a minimum net amount of 0.7% of its gross national product [...] by the middle of
the decade." Most countries have been unwilling, to reach this goal. The United States is at the
bottom of the list, giving an insignificant 0.17%. Insignificant; not only because of the minuscule
amount that it allocated for foreign aid, but the tactless reality that the U.S, is more likely to bomb
other countries than assist in building them. Furthermore, in 2016, the United

The Prisoner 's Dilemma And Game Theory
The first thing that comes to mind at the mention of Nuclear Warfare is the Cold War between the
U.S. and the U.S.S.R. These two major global powers fought for dominance on the global stage for
what purpose? They fought to ensure that neither side's values and structures could dominate the
world at the cost of the other's destruction. At its peak, in the 1950s and 1960s, the Cold War
represented a way of life for many Americans and Russians. The constant fear and belief that we
could be bombed at any second seriously impacted the standards of living in both nations.
Comparable to the fear of terrorism in the in the 21st Century, the Cold War dominates the history
books during this period of time. At the same time, during the 50's, in a different field of study, the
concept of the prisoner's dilemma and game theory were being developed. That reason, may explain
why this particular dilemma is associated with nuclear decisions.
Upon closer inspection, the nuclear warfare debacle isn't quite a prisoner's dilemma. There are
outside factors that influence the decisions made by heads of state that change the dynamics of the
game. A true prisoner's dilemma would assign values to cooperation (not bombing) and defection
(bombing) in such a way that the equilibrium outcome is mutual defection. The outcome that is most
likely to occur based on the beneficial choices of each nation is mutual bombing of the other nation.
Is it the best outcome? No. Is it the moral outcome? No. Is it the

Mutually Assured Destruction Of The Cold War
In the mid–1960s, a doctrine was created officially accepting that the Soviet Union and the United
States of America could completely destroy each other by means of nuclear warfare. This doctrine
was labeled as Mutually Assured Destruction, or Mutual Assured Destruction, A.K.A MAD. The
meaning of this term defines the fact that any and all parties involved with nuclear war would be
utterly obliviated, therefore deterring countries from partaking in such an event.
As both sides of the Cold War began to fashion intensely dangerous weapons, it was soon realized
that if either party launched a first strike, it would be ensuring the death of their opponent as well as
themselves. The Soviet Union's development of their nuclear arsenal forced

Good Versus Evil, The Allies Versus The Axis, World War II
Good versus evil, the allies versus the axis, world war II was raging throughout Europe, Africa, and
Asia. Neither winning nor losing was guaranteed to either side, so each wanted an ace up their
sleeve. In fear of Germany acquiring a nuclear bomb, the United States set up their own program,
the Manhattan project, in order to make one before the Nazis could. With the help of British and
refugee scientists, and a blank check of two billion dollars, now $32.5 billion, the Manhattan project
was born in 1942, and only three years later in 1945, the first atomic bomb was tested in New
Mexico. Ironically, by this time Germany had stopped trying to make a nuclear bomb. Although the
war was reaching its final hour, Japan showed no intention to surrender, so in order to avoid a costly
invasion, the United States pulled out its ace and dropped Little Boy on Hiroshima and 3 days later,
Fat Man on Nagasaki . With the war having ended and the world having seen the grand awe of a
nuclear weapon, the enemy of my enemy is my friend mentality of the United States' and Soviet
Union's alliance was no more, and the two superpowers were thrust into the Cold War. Although the
cold war caused death and despair, the arms race between the United States and Soviet union had
positive effects, therefore the cold war had a positive effect on the world.
Despite the Cold War having no direct fighting between the U.S and the soviets, there were still
multiple costly indirect conflicts between the two

The Importance Of Masculine And Feminine In Dr. Strangelove
Anu Karavadi
Professor Morgan
AMS 421
3 November 2016
1554
The Importance of Masculine and Feminine in Dr. Strangelove
Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) is a dark comedy
film by Stanley Kubrick. The film deals with nuclear war which was a hot topic during the 50 's and
60 's. Americans were very paranoid about communists and nuclear war at this time. This film
shows how ridiculous the paranoia about nuclear war through a sexual relationship allegory. The
allegory deals with the masculine and the feminine. The masculine is an important part of the
nuclear war efforts while the feminine takes a backseat. The feminine is displayed in men as a
negative. The sexual allegory becomes funny through ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove are all shown as weak and impotent. The characters are either physically handicapped
or just weak minded. Mandrake and President both are represented as meek while Dr. Strangelove is
physically impaired in a wheelchair with a prosthetic arm. These characters are all hesitant in some
way to wage war which is shown as a negative. They are seen as incapable when it comes time to
take control of the situation. Mandrake couldn 't stop Jack D. Ripper from launching the nuke. The
President couldn 't seize control over his own army. Dr. Strangelove couldn 't control his arm at the
very end. These are all deliberate to show their submissive femininity.
The president and Mandrake are both feminine in their demeanor and personality. They don 't want
to go to war, but they also cannot take control and stop the war. This can be seen as the female of the
relationship not wanting sex. This leads those "masculine" men frustrated. The masculine characters
in the film, Buck and Jack D. Ripper, are quite enthusiastic for nuclear war and sex. Their desire for
sex and war allows them to go forward in the war effort in an energetic manner.
Buck is always energetic when talking about the war, so much so, that he literally fights in the war
room. Buck wrestles with the Russian diplomat due to his enthusiasm for war and his sexual
frustration. This causes the president to say "There is no fighting in the war room." The movie uses
this line for

Dr Strangelove And The Cold War
The movies WarGames and Dr. Strangelove (or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the
Bomb) provide incredibly interesting narratives that provide two different narratives regarding
public perception of the cold war and nuclear weapons. WarGames made the statement that tensions
during the Cold War were so high that a teenager playing a videogame could set off a nuclear war,
while Dr. Strangelove simply ridiculed the attitudes of those involved in the Cold War and mocked
those who took it seriously, under the pretense that mutually assured destruction would prevent any
real war from breaking out (and as a plot device to depict irony). In reality, the American public was
in constant fear of the outbreak of war during the period of time in ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove are anti–war movies, although they portray it in very different ways. WarGames depicts
this by showing the consequences of the war via simulation, while Dr. Strangelove showed the
consequences of the war simply through discussion, and implied that those repercussions actually
occurred after a bomb was dropped at the end of the movie. In WarGames, the famous line "the only
way to win is not to play" was first uttered, which completely captures the spirit of the Cold War –
any move by any party would have caused the extinction of the human race. Kubrick embodied this
in Dr. Strangelove with the plot point of the doomsday device, showing that if the United States
engaged the Soviet Union at all that it would assure their own destruction. Overall, while WarGames
made the statement that tensions during the Cold War were so high that a teenager playing a
videogame could set off a nuclear war, Dr. Strangelove simply ridiculed the attitudes of those
involved in the Cold War and mocked those who took it seriously, under the pretense that mutually
assured destruction would prevent any real war from breaking out. It's clear that WarGames was
written to show that a worst–case scenario, which we consider today to be highly unlikely, was
actually quite the possibility during the peak of the Cold War. In Dr. Strangelove, the director
Stanley Kubrick showed that no sane person could possibly believe that the Cold War could have
come to fruition in a way

Dr. Strangelove 's Argument For The 1964 Film Essay
Charles Maland's argument for the 1964 film Dr. Strangelove is that it was one of the most
"fascinating and important American films of the 1960s." He backs up his argument with evidence
of the films rejection of the Ideology of Liberal Consensus, its attack on "crackpot realism" and
critique of life in the 1960s Cold War era, and finally its paradoxical revolution that sets an example
for other films to come after. The Ideology of Liberal Consensus according to Maland was explained
as the United States' structure of society as being basically sound. This would stand for a capitalistic
and democratic society as opposed to the Soviet Union's communist or state–capitalist economy and
governmental structure. The second point of the Ideology of Liberal Consensus was that
communism was a clear danger to the survival of the United States and its allies. It's clear that
neither of the two world powers were eager to adopt one another's economic or governmental
structure, however, both sides were eager to stretch their sphere of influence to other regions of the
world after World War Two. Maland proclaims that the American people had felt threatened by
foreign totalitarian regimes, such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. This fear of totalitarianism
was solidified by the U.S.' involvement in World War Two with their goals to destroy fascist
regimes. While the film Dr. Strangelove was being developed by Stanley Kubrick, the American
public was in a transitional period away from

Significance Of The Character Of Sam 's Mother
1B) Discuss the significance of the character of Sam 's mother in Brazil. 300 Words Sam Lowry 's
mother, Ida, plays a significant role in the events of the film Brazil. She was always pushing Sam to
better himself by moving up the bureaucratic ladder. This is something that did not interest Sam, in
any way, as he was already fed up with his job and was looking for any excuse to escape this reality.
However, she also stood as an example of the capitalist attitude that was being shared by the people
living in Western society. She was another cog in the bureaucratic machine who believed in her
looks to the point of being obsessed with celebrity and plastic surgery. Ida would do anything to
keep those in the upper echelon of the government ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Strangelove (Dr. Strangelove) and Felix Hoeniker (Cat 's Cradle) 800 Words The film Dr
Strangelove is a political satire as well as a black comedy that satirizes the Cold War and the fears of
people at this time where it concerned nuclear conflict between the Soviet Union and the United
States. While the novel Cat 's Cradle explores issues of science, technology, and religion, satirizing
the arms race and many other targets along the way. Both of these works of media were created in
the early 1960s and look to satirize the period and time in which they take place. The main character
in the film Dr. Strangelove, is Dr. Strangelove who represents . While in the novel, Cat 's Cradle, the
main character that drives the satire is Felix Hoenikker. Dr. Strangelove is is an ex–Nazi scientist.
He serves as President Muffley 's scientific adviser in the War Room. He accidentally addresses the
president as Mein Führer. The character is an amalgamation of multiple famous Cold War figures
such Wernher von Braun, Edward Teller, John von Neumann and Herman Kahn. He is bound to a
wheelchair and is meant to be an intimidating character, who 's ability to intimidate is not affected
by his handicap. The look of Dr. Strangelove is meant to immediately make the audience think mad
scientist as it was based on the appearance of mad scientists from the past. An example of this kind
of mad scientist could be found in the film Metropolis. Dr. Strangelove, much like Dr. Rotwang had

The Cold War During World War II Essay
The Cold War was one of the most fear–inducing situations in American history. Post World War II,
the superpowers of the world, namely the United States and the U.S.S.R, struggled to settle issues
that arose from initiatives and responses after the war. These created the climate of tension and
distrust between the two nations (Sibley 1). The United States held tightly to its liberal–capitalist
beliefs while the Soviets "...professed fervent belief," in their Marxist–Leninist ideology (Sibley 1).
Many events led to the tension between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. First, the Soviets grew to distrust the
Americans because, during World War II, the U.S. waited a long time to open a second front and
relieve the Russians of the German attack. Then, during the Yalta Conference of 1945, it was agreed
that Poland would be led by both democratic and communist powers until a democratic election
could take place, but Communists took over soon after that and controlled Poland for the next four
decades. This left the U.S. State Department feeling betrayed by the Soviets. The Soviets, in turn,
felt betrayed by the United States after they were pushed out of Japan with the dropping of the
Atomic Bomb. After that, a U.S. representative to the UN Atomic Energy Commission proposed that
all atomic weapons materials be placed under international control and to destroy weapons that
already existed (Sibley 7). Russia did not like this plan because it allowed the United States to hold
onto its complete

The Pros And Cons Of Mutual Assured Destruction

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tara Smith

More from Tara Smith (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Pros And Cons Of Mutual Assured Destruction