Swapnil S. Jagtap presented a seminar on secure and efficient data transmission methods for cluster-based wireless sensor networks. The presentation covered cluster network architecture, two proposed protocols called SET-IBS and SET-IBOOS, and compared the characteristics of the proposed protocols to other secure data transmission protocols. The protocols aim to securely and efficiently transmit data in cluster-based wireless sensor networks through the use of identity-based digital signatures.

1. Seminar On
Cluster-based Wireless Sensor Network (WSN)
Methods for Secure and Efficient
Data Transmission
Presented By
Swapnil S. Jagtap
Under The Guidance of
Guide Name
Department of Computer Engineering,
Vidya Pratishthan’s College of Engineering,
Baramati.
October 19, 2018

2. Contents
1 Introduction
2 Literature Survey
3 Motivation
4 Cluster Network Architecture
5 Proposed Protocols
6 Comparison
7 Conclusion
8 References

3. Introduction
A wireless sensor network (WSN) is a network system comprised of
spatially distributed devices using wireless sensor nodes to monitor physical or
environmental conditions like temperature, sound, pollution levels, humidity,
wind speed and direction, pressure, etc.
The individual nodes are capable of sensing their environments,
processing the information data locally, and sending data to one or more
collection points in a WSN.
Many WSNs are deployed in harsh, neglected and often adversarial
physical environments for certain applications, such as military domains and
sensing tasks with trustless surroundings.
WSN comes under IEEE 802.15.4 standard.
The WSN is built for the application oriented network.
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 1 / 17

4. Wireless Sensor Node
Figure: Components of the Wireless Sensor Node
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 2 / 17

5. Literature Survey
Authors Year Paper Title Description
Huang Lu, 2012 Secure & Efficient SET-IBS &
Jie Li Data Transmission SET-IBOOS protocols
for CWSNs
Y. Wang, 2006 A Survey of Security Data aggregation in WSNs
G. Attebury, Issues in WSNs for military operations,
B. Ramamurthy Symmetric key cryptography
Deng Jing, 2004 Balanced Energy Balanced-energy scheduling(BS),
Han Yunghsiang, Sleep scheduling Randomized scheduling (RS),
Heinzelman Weni scheme for high Distance-based scheduling (DS)
density CWSNs Schemes
Jamal Al-Karaki, 2004 Routing Techniques Flat-based routing,
Ahmed E. Kamal in Wireless Sensor Hierarchical-based routing,
Networks Location-based routing
Chris Karlof, 2003 Secure Routing in Sinkhole attack,
David Wagner Wireless Sensor Hello Flood attack
Networks
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 3 / 17

6. Motivation
Day by day we are getting surrounded by number of sensor nodes
around us, or we can say that we are becoming dependent on these sensor
nodes which we come across in our daily life.
This thing motivated me to study about the technology known as
Cluster-based Wireless Sensor Networks (CWSNs), which is now a days
widely used every where in the industry, medical, agricultural, military,
disaster management, environmental fields.
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 4 / 17

7. Sensors in Smartphone
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 5 / 17

8. Cluster Network Architecture
Figure: Simple Cluster Network Architecture
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 6 / 17

9. Proposed Protocols
1 Secure and Efficient data Transmission using Identity-Based digital
Signature (SET-IBS)
2 Secure and Efficient data Transmission using Identity-Based
Online/Offline digital Signature (SET-IBOOS)
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 7 / 17

10. Phases in the proposed system
Figure: Operation in the proposed system
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 8 / 17

11. Steps for SET-IBS Protocol for CWSN
Setup: The BS generates a master key msk and public parameters param
for the private key generator (PKG), and gives them to all sensor nodes.
Extraction: Given an ID string, a sensor node generates a private key
sekID associated with the ID using msk.
Signature signing: Given a message M, time-stamp t and a signing key
θ, the sending node generates a signature SIG.
Verification: Given the ID, M and SIG, the receiving node (CH node)
outputs “accept”if SIG is valid, and outputs “reject”otherwise.
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 9 / 17

12. Operation in SET-IBS Protocol
Setup phase
Step 1. BS ⇒ Gs : IDbs, Ts, nonce
Step 2. CHi ⇒ Gs : IDi, Ts, adv, σi, ci
Step 3. Lj → CHi : IDi, IDj, Ts, join, σj, cj
Step 4. CHi ⇒ Gs : IDi, Ts, sched(IDj/tj), σi, ci
Steady state phase
Step 5. Lj → CHi : IDi, IDj, tj, C, σj, cj
Step 6. CHi → BS : IDbs, IDi, Ts, F, σi, ci
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 10 / 17

13. Steps for SET-IBOOS Protocol for CWSN
Setup: The BS generates a master key msk and public parameters param
for the private key generator (PKG), and gives them to all sensor nodes.
Extraction: Given an ID string, a sensor node generates a private key
sekID associated with the ID using msk.
Offline signing: Given public parameters and time-stamp t, the CH
sensor node generates an offline signature SIGoffline, and transmit it to
the leaf nodes in its cluster.
Online signing: From the private key sekID, SIGoffline and message
M, a sending node (leaf node) generates an online signature SIGonline.
Verification: Given ID, M and SIGonline, the receiving node (CH node)
outputs “accept”if SIGonline is valid, and outputs “reject”otherwise.
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 11 / 17

14. Operation in SET-IBOOS Protocol
Setup phase
Step 1. BS ⇒ Gs : IDbs, Ts, nonce
Step 2. CHi ⇒ Gs : IDi, Ts, adv, σi, zi
Step 3. Lj → CHi : IDi, IDj, Ts, join, σj, zj
Step 4. CHi ⇒ Gs : IDi, Ts, alloc(IDj/tj/σj), σi, zi
Steady state phase
Step 5. Lj → CHi : IDi, IDj, tj, C, σj, zj
Step 6. CHi → BS : IDbs, IDi, Ts, F, σi, zi
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 12 / 17

15. Message Size of Data Transmission
For SET-IBS,
|IDj| + |ti| + |C| + |σj| + |h(C ti θ)|
where,
|IDj| and |ti| are 2 bytes
|C| is 20 bytes
and the hash value |h(C ti θ)| is 20 bytes
The total message size is 44+|σj| bytes in SET-IBS.
For SET-IBOOS,
|IDj| + |tj| + |C| + |σj| + |zj|
where,
|σj| + |zj| is the online signature of size 2 bytes
The total message size is 46 bytes in SET-IBOOS.
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 13 / 17

16. Comparison
Table: Comparison of characteristics of the proposed protocols with other secure
data transmission protocols
SET-IBS / SET-IBOOS Other Protocols
Key Asymmetric Symmetric
management
Neighborhood Yes Limited
authentication
Storage Comparatively low Comparatively high
cost
Network Comparatively high Comparatively low
scalability
Communication Deterministic Probabilistic
overhead
Computational Comparatively high Low ∼ High
overhead
Attack Active and Passive attacks on wireless channel
resilience
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 14 / 17

17. Conclusion
We first studied about the wireless sensor nodes and then the wireless
sensor networks. We then studied two secure and efficient data transmission
protocols for CWSNs, SET-IBS and SET-IBOOS which are efficient in
communication and which achieves security requirements in CWSNs.
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 15 / 17

18. References
1 Huang Lu, Jie Li, and Mohsen Guizani, “Secure and Efficient Data
Transmission for Cluster-based Wireless Sensor Networks,”IEEE Trans.
on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2012.
2 Y.Wang, G. Attebury, and B. Ramamurthy, “A Survey of Security Issues
in Wireless Sensor Networks,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 8, no.
2, 2006.
3 W. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, “An
application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor
networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 1, no. 4, 2002.
4 A. Manjeshwar, Q.-A.Zeng, and D. P. Agrawal, “An analytical model for
information retrieval in wireless sensor networks using enhanced
APTEEN protocol,”IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 13, 2002.
5 P. Banerjee, D. Jacobson, and S. Lahiri, “Security and performance
analysis of a secure clustering protocol for sensor networks,”in Proc.
IEEE NCA, 2007.
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 16 / 17

19. 6 G. Gaubatz, J. P. Kaps, E. Ozturk et al., “State of the Art in Ultra-Low
Power Public Key Cryptography for WSNs,”in Proc. IEEE PerCom
Workshops, 2005.
7 R. Yasmin, E. Ritter, and G. Wang, “An Authentication Framework for
Wireless Sensor Networks using Identity-Based Signatures,”in Proc.
IEEE CIT, 2010.
8 H. Lu, J. Li, and H. Kameda, “A Secure Routing Protocol for
Cluster-Based WSNs Using ID-Based Digital Signature,”in Proc. IEEE
GLOBECOM, 2010.
9 W. Diffie and M. Hellman, “New directions in cryptography,”IEEE Trans.
Inf. Theory, vol. 22, no. 6, 1976.
10 Y. Jia, L. Zhao, and B. Ma, “A Hierarchical Clustering-based Routing
Protocol for WSNs Supporting Multiple Data Aggregation
Qualities,”IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 4, no. 1-2, 2008.
Swapnil S. Jagtap CWSN October 19, 2018 17 / 17

20. THANK YOU