Informative Essay On Standardized Tests

Informative Essay On Standardized Tests
On standardized tests, I do well if I recall any topics that I might've learned either from the current year or in the previous years. I consider myself
a good test taker because I can remember anything in the past, so when there's a question that has something familiar with what I've done before I
can use this for help. I always do this during these standardized tests. To prepare, I must take out all the work I've done in the past to help me study.
By the night before the test, I should know everything by that sundown and get my parents to help me study and have everything ready on the day of
the test. The kinds of test questions I do best are the types I studied, while the ones I struggle are the types I haven't even learned yet. I think
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Standardized Tests Essay
Teachers spend time on the memorization of specific words that will be on the state test, not vocabulary building exercises. Educators have pep rallies
that take educational time away from lesson plans and teaching in order to have the students learn cheers expressing how well they are going to do on
the state test. Excess teacher and administration time is spent figuring out game plans, but not for teaching students, rather for figuring out how to
increase test scores. Meanwhile, when students are truly excited about exploring a topic in depth, they are shut down because there is no time to learn,
only time to memorize items that might be on these tests. Standardized tests waste classroom time and do not accurately measure ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Many high school students do not even take these tests seriously because many of them are at the same intellectual level as adults and realize that the
tests are flawed. Still, they might not consider that these flawed tests might lessen their chances of getting into college. Certainly, one could envision a
system of standardized tests where learning is at the center.
These tests are biased and prefer certain groups over others, making them unfair and denying equal opportunity for education. Minority and low income
students are affected far more than middle–class, majority students. In fact, if the government persists in making a student's graduation rest on a
single test, the result over the next few years could be a scenario that might be "described as an educational ethnic cleansing" (Kohn, 2000). It is
unfair to base a school's funding on these tests when clearly any underperforming schools would benefit greater from an increase of resources as
opposed to schools that perform at a higher level. Every year 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school based on their test scores and
therefore, cost the Nation more than $3.1 million in lost wages, taxes, and productivity over their lifetimes (Congress, 2011). It has taken some time for
educators and parents to realize that the idiom of "standards" is turning schools into test–prep centers, effectively undermining enthusiasm for learning
and teaching.

Standardized Testing And Standardized Tests
You must mark all your answers on this answer sheet. Use only a No. 2 pencil. You may not use a pen. When you fill in the circles, make heavy
black marks. If you make a mistake, erase it completely. Make no stray marks. Do not make any marks on the back of the answer sheet. These
instructions are something we have all nearly fallen asleep to over our years of standardized tests. I myself can be included with you in that
experience and I hope to give you a little more information on these all too familiar tests this afternoon. Today we are going to look at the origins of
standardized testing, the purpose of standardized testing, and standardized tests around the world. But first, I want to ask you another question: what is
standardized... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the article titled, "Standardized Testing Hits a Nerve," it further explains that this act demands that states assess their students at certain grade levels
and in specific subjects to determine the performance of their schools. Critics of the act state that it places too much pressure on teachers and creates
more unnecessary stress for the students. On the other hand, supporters agree that the Act creates a solid accountability system for our schools in the
United States. The No Child Left Behind Act is a significant change in our education system due to the sweeping changes it made to nearly all schools
across the entire country.
Now, moving on to choice B. Let 's study the purposes of standardized testing in the United States. Professor James Popham, an education professor at
UCLA, wrote in Educational Leadership, a publication centered around the topic of teaching, about the difference between two types of standardized
tests. Aptitude tests are tests like the SAT or ACT. They try to predict how students will do in a new educational setting, like predicting howhigh school
students will do in college. Achievement tests are used for evaluations. So these would be more like what is given by the state or school district to
evaluate the success of a school. Knowing the difference between each type of standardized test is important because if you are not aware of the
purpose it is intended

Perceptions Of Standardized Test
l
Introduction
Perceptions of Standardized Test
EDU 620
Summer 2015
Francise Henderson
William Carey University Introduction
Purpose Statement The purpose of this research is to examine the perception of standardized test in America's public schools. Justification This research
examines the perceptions of standardized test administered in America's public schools. Stiggins states that "these once–a–year tests are not likely to be
of much value to classroom teachers as you plan and carry out day–to–day instruction. They are assessments of learning that are too infrequent, broad
in focus, and slow in returning results to inform the ongoing array of daily decisions. But this does not mean that these tests are without purpose or
value. They

Why Are Standardized Tests Important?
Students have heard this before. Struggling to get through the stress that circling bubbles, or writing what seems to be pointless words on a paper.
Then the proctor says the five words that makes a person reach the climax of wanting to tear out their hair and scream. Those five words are, "You
have one minute remaining". The standardized tests have become one of the most widely accepted tools colleges and universities use to evaluate if a
person is ready enough to handle material taught at a college level. Over 85% of higher education institutions require some form of standardized test in
order to even be considered as an acceptable applicant for acceptance (collegeboard.org). A big way teachers are preparing students for this test are...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The way schools are attempting to accomplish this is by making them read works that pertain to the Literary Canon. At Marquette High School in
St. Louis Missouri, a typical 10th grade curriculum consists of reading material such as Antigone, Julius Cesar, After the First Death, and Lord of
the Flies (rsdmo.org). All of the works listed are current books that fall in the Literary Canon. These books are said to be must reads for anyone who
wants to succeed academically. This means that it is essential that students read a handful of these works before college to properly be equipped to
take on college curriculum. The main question that still comes up is, Are these works truly providing students with better preparation to take the
standardize tests? There is massive debate on weather The Canon needs to change or expand to help with preparing students for college. People
however are ignoring this issue and in turn are simply just using the current works within the canon because that is what they feel will help the students
prepare them for the content presented within these tests. Schools are now starting to be forced with "accountability" for teaching these works and are
measured based on what the students score on standardized tests. A study was done on Fairfax School District on how they prepared students for
standardize testing. Teachers are told

Standardized Test Essay
Standardized test are one of the many measures profession school counselors use to assess students performance and learning. When it come to making
a decision about a student's educational performance, school counselors prefer more than one criteria instead of just using a single test. The No Child
Left Behind Act (NCLB) established in 2001 stated that the academic achievement of all student should be held accountable by the school.
"High–stakes testing, which refers to the use of standardized test scores to determine levels of student achievement, became the decision–making,
measurement vehicle. High–stakes test results are often used as a method to determine a student's: academic placement, promotion and retention,
graduation and intervention services. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The NCLB act was put into place so that the school is held accountable for the passing or failing of students. High stakes testing which is standardized
testing where test scores is used to determine the academic level of the students. If your school scored well or poorly on the test your school would
either receive increased or reduced funding. Using this standardized test helped the schools to see where they needed to help the students whether it be
changing the curriculum or changing the teacher certification standards. The school counselor plays a role in the testing also. According to the ASCA
"professional school counselors recognize that standardized test results provide valuable information related to student achievement. However, these
results only provide a partial picture of student learning. When important educational decisions are made, professional school counselors advocate for
the use of multiple criteria in the decision–making process. These criteria may include but are not limited to:
standardized tests results

Standardized Test
Article 3: The article, "From Standardized Tests to Alternative Methods: Some Current Resources on Methods to Access Learning in General
Education." by Peggy L. Maki, focuses on the importance of assessment and different forms of assessments that can be used. The use of standardized
tests as a form of assessment is highly debated, this article questions standardized test and what they are measuring. The article also gives suggestions to
teachers when planning and choosing assessment to assess their students learning in the general education classroom. The use of standardized testing as
a form of assessment is highly controversial in the world of education. Standardized test compares students results to a national standard. Some teachers

Essay on Standardized Tests Are Ineffective
Standardized tests are unnecessary because they are excruciating to the minds of many innocent students. Each year, the tests get tougher and stricter
until the students cannot process their own thoughts. The tests become torturous to the minds of those only starting in the world of tests. The students
already battling in the war are continuing to fall deeper and deeper into the world of uncreativity and narrowness. As the walls narrow in on them, they
are lost and unable to become innovative thinkers. Moreover, the implementation of standardized tests into the public school systems of the United
States of America has controversially raised two different views –the proponents versus the opponents in the battle of the effectiveness of ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Additionally, Albert Einstein once said, "Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing
that it is stupid." There are different forms of intelligence that go beyond what our school system measures. Students are not a unit to be measured, and
students cannot be assigned a numerical value to identify their intelligence. Students are diverse–they learn at different speeds, and they learn in
different ways. Focusing solely on test scores is hurting our students and deviating away from building our society on success and excellence. Critics
are slowly realizing the problems associated with standardized tests–they create anxiety, they are extremely biased, and they do not measure the ability
to think deeply.
Standardized tests inhibit the ability for students to perform well on stress inducing tests; thus, students question their abilities to succeed, and they
lack engagement in their educational learning. Standardized tests produce the feeling of anxiety as heart beats accelerate, bodies' tremble, faces flush,
sweat pores open, hands grip tighter, and muscles tense. As the test dates come closer, students are

Standardized Tests
Standardized tests are annoying little things that students in schools all across the nation have to take every year. Though, if all the facts are taken into
consideration, they do not really seem worth it, do they? Many people speculate whether or not they are actually measuring a student's intelligence or
anything like that. It seems that students do not necessarily have to learn the material, only memorize it for a short period of time. The question has to
be raised, though–– what exactly qualifies a test to be a standardized test? Well, as described by The Glossary ofEducation Reform, there are two main
things that make a test standardized. The first being that the test "...requires all test takers to answer the same questions, or ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When students think about tests, their thoughts tend to move more towards the idea of "how am I going to memorize all of this in one week," I know
this from experience. Why is this the way that students treat such "important" tests? I ask myself that question just about every time I think about
taking an end of course test, SAT, ACT, or anything like that. All across the nation, students have also been introduced to a thing called common core,
which has, for some reason, been made even more difficult than the previous set standards. This seems to be no solution to the problem, but will more
than likely only worsen the ditch that we have gotten ourselves into, in terms of education. Before focusing on making school more challenging for
students and teachers, would not it make more sense for the problem of students not actually learning the content of the course to be fixed first? With
more challenging tests, comes more confused students who are willing to do anything just to pass; including flushing their education down the toilet.
They do this by only storing the information in their short–term memory rather than actually learning the content of the class, but it's not always their
faults, either. The way the school system is set up, students are not taught how to actually learn the material or use it in real life. A student's only goal
is making good grades on the tests and surviving the class. This memorizing business can hurt students later on in life, as well. These kids get used to
taking the easy way out, and will never learn the "deeper–thinking skills" that they need to succeed in the world today. "The focus on memorization,
fueled by standardized testing, has obstructed learning, according to Linda Darling–Hammond of Stanford University, who argues that students have
been losing or squandering most of the information they acquire in school." (Towler.) Even a

Standardized Test Scores
Eight hours a day, five days a week, four years that is how long I have been subject to the high school education system. A system meant to teach the
fundamentals, the fundamentals of reading and math. Yet, there are many subjects that are forgotten such as humanities and histories. So, as I sit in
this stiff and at times cold desk staring at my computer screen typing these words it is hard not to ponder the reasoning behind these decisions. Why
executive board members have allowed public education to be ruled by numbers. The answer it appears is simple, funding. Standardized test scores are
all too important to state and federal governments who allocate school funding. Which is why these subjects such as math or reading take priority from

Standardized Tests Argument
Standardized tests argument Do we really need 20–25 hours for testing? Some people think testing is fine the way it is. I think testing needs a change.
We spend way too much time doing standardized tests that don't even measure the skills people need in life. My main pieces of evidence are, the
government is suggesting shorter tests, many other factors can affect standardized test scores, and my last piece of evidence is standardized tests don't
measure all the skills people need in life. My first piece of evidence is the government is suggesting shorter tests. Kids spend on average 20–25 hours
taking standardized tests. We could spend more time learning other things rather than teaching to the test. 2.3% of class time is spent on testing. ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One thing standardized tests doesn't measure is creativity, or how well we think about it. Another thing is verbal skills, it doesn't measure how well
we speak or read. We've been taking the same IQ test for 100 years. We have had many chances to change the test ,but they think it is fine. This
paragraph explains that standardized tests don't measure all the skills people need in life. Some people believe the test does not need to be changed
and that it is just fine. 20–25 hours of testing is just the right amount of testing to give the correct data. I think not, it still does not measure life skills
and it is way too long. So now you know why the test needs changing. This essay explains why we need shorter standardized tests. The main pieces
of evidence I have used are, the government is suggesting shorter tests. My second piece of evidence is many other factors can affect standardized
test scores. My last piece of evidence is standardized tests don't measure all the skills people need in life. Now join me to protest for shorter standardized

Standardized Tests : Standardized Testing
Bob Botkin
ENC 1101–095
13 Oct 2015
Standardized Testing in Florida In recent years Florida's standardized testing program has taken a turn for the worst. After doing away with the FCAT
(Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test) the debate has only grown due to flood of new tests being created such as the Florida Standards Assessment
(FSA) or End of Course Exam (EOC). These tests are administered to test students' abilities at the end of the school year. In spring of 2015, with only
two months of testing between the EOC's and the FSA, Florida's legislature implemented the FSA. The main reason the testing was delayed was
because the new tests had to be administered on a computer, so that scores could be calculated faster. Though most of the recent issues make it seem
that testing is useless, there are still positives. Administering these tests allows the state to measure the level of improvement in the education students
are receiving and it keeps the teachers adhering to the curriculum plan. The positive and negative points about testing bring up the question: Should
standardized testing in Florida be eliminated or changed? In the early 2000's Florida created a standardized testing exam called the Florida
Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT). At the same time Florida legislature implemented a policy to make sure students are not "socially promoted"
(Greene et al 65) to the next grade level without learning the entire curriculum needed. With this policy students

Standardized Test are Worthless
Do you really think having to sit on a wooden seat for nearly two hours is really worth it? Especially having to sit for a ridiculous test? If you ask me,
I'd say "heck no"! While researching text I've gotten to the conclusion that standardized test should be eliminated from school districts. Due to the
voluminous amount of statistical data and research, there is no doubt–standardized tests should no longer be continued, but however, should be taken
out and discontinued, while being removed forever and ever. To begin with, the teacher's goal is to prepare well their students to pass the standardized
test given. Yes, I acknowledge that teachers do prepare students well enough to pass the test and provide them with enough information to relief them.
But teachers are therefore only teaching materials that will be on the exam test. With this being said, students aren't actually learning anything else but
what's going to appear on the exam. According to a testing scholar Richard P. Phelps "93% of studies on student testing, including the use of
large–scale and high–stakes standardized tests found a positive effect on students achievement". In reality standardized test have not improved student
achievements. Though many may say standardized test improve ones knowledge is completely false. Researcher Gregory J. Cizek states,
"Standardized testing causes severe stress in younger students". In other words, Gregory believes this kind of test don't make a major

Standardized Tests Are Not A Success
Standardized Tests are Not a Success Standardized testing has been ruling over the lives of students, making or breaking them in their education
without fair judgement. Tests like the SAT and the ACT count for way too much when applying to colleges, which in turn limits the student 's
capabilities to thrive in an environment that would benefit them. There are many problems within a standardized test that deems them to be unreliable as
a true test of knowledge. Although designed to test groups of students on intelligence, standardized testing neglects to fairly acknowledge the abilities
of each unique student which reflect their true capabilities. Testing has been used for centuries in many different ways, not just to test student
intelligence levels. According to an article written in Time, the earliest form of astandardized test comes from China where government leaders would
be tested on their knowledge of Confucius and poetry. The article continues with the inclusion of testing during the Industrial Revolution. The testing
during this period took children who were not in school and measured their knowledge of subjects that students in schools learned. As time went on,
more and more advances came to the testing scene. New products included a revised version of the test, called the Stanford–Binet Intelligence Test, and
professionals developed the test scanner by 1936. These inventions improved the time necessary to receive results from an IQ test. Today, tests, like the

Is It A Standardized Test?
Who gets to decide what it means to be well educated?
Does the phrase well educated refer to the quality of schooling you received or to something about you? Who gets to decide what it means? Is it a
standardized test? Is it our test scores or memorization of facts? How much or how well we can remember at a given point in time? How much
knowledge we ought to have? What could it possibly be? I think this society has given "Well Educated" a poor definition. Sitting in a class for a long
time does not make us educated. Test scores does not make us educated neither does reading faster than others or solving mathematical calculations.
Not everyone has to same knowledge of a certain thing, so why judge us on the same criteria. Does it denote what we were taught? If the term refers
to what we know or what we can do then we could be poorly educated despite receiving a top–notch education, and if it is, then the numerous people
constantly going to get an education in big name schools are unintelligent. In addition, if it refers to the quality of schooling, then many well–educated
people sat through lesson that was too irrelevant for them to remember a few years later.
Why do we go to school? The first eighteen years of life, going to school is not always by choice but compulsory. We are told that if we want to
make our lives better we have to go to school. We go to school because the law tells us to; it indirectly states that to be more than average and earn a
good paycheck, we have

Standardized Tests Are Not A Fair
Essay One Standardized tests have been around for a very long time, and they are probably going to be around for a long time to come. Testing
students does provide information about a school district, student, and teacher, but it is definitely not the entire picture. Everyone would probably
agree that the results of one test would not be a fair evaluation of the student. In order to fairly evaluate a student, grades, tests scores, and progress
should all be considered. Teachers should be evaluated in the same way as the students, through student's progress, grades and tests scores. There is no
way to fairly evaluate a teacher if you are solely or mainly counting test scores. Standardized tests are not a fair way to evaluate a teacher. Due to the
industrial revolution, school aged laborers returned to school. The schools needed to know where to place these children academically. Standardized
tests were given to be able to determine what knowledge these children had. In the mid–1800's Boston used standardized tests to compare and judge
each school. Boston's policies were adopted by school systems nationwide. Skipping ahead to 1983 when President Ronald Regan's National
Commission on Excellence in Education released the report, "A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform." This report drew great
criticism to our educational system. Politicians and citizens demanded reform. They wanted teachers and schools held to a higher level of accountability.

Persuasive Essay On Standardized Tests
In the United State there is a test called Standardized test, which comes in every level of education. Standardized test is any form of test in which all
test takers are required to answer the same questions. This test is given in believe of that it will determine individual's skill. This got introduced in the
mid 1800 and ever since that, this has been one of the requirement educational background qualification. Standardized test has been an argumentative
topic for a lot of people, some people think it is a good method of determining someone's knowledge on courses. However there are people who think
that standardized testing should not be the only way to measure student skills. This is not something we can conclude by just saying , we should take
standardized test or we should not take standardized test, because not everyone think the same way. This topic is open to an individual perspective.
This research will state both sides of standardised test, meaning will give both side information leaving the the decision to the reader whether students
should take standardized test in the United states.
Michael V. Mcgill, director of the district leadership and reform program at Bank Street College of Education and former superintendent of schools in
Scarsdale, N.Y. mentioned an interesting idea saying, "There's no reason to require that all children in a state take the same standardized exams every
year". This perfectly make sense because not every school or district give the

Standardized Test Dbq
When comes to education in America, far to offer our society labels people as un– educated because the inability to pass standardized tests. In reality,
we shouldn't base a person's ability to determine if they're educated because that's far from the truth. I believe that standardized test isn't the only way to
determine every student's education knowledge. For example, high scores standardized test doesn't signify that you are talented thinking or a student.
The goal of education is more education, but the majority of people like this don't get the opportunity like others. Just think they could have been
people who made good grades and excelled in school, but didn't get a full ride scholarship to a certain college. There are people who didn't go to
college, but are successful today. It doesn't happen, for the majority of us, but we can't just single out those people who have originated up with
creativity, intelligence with ideas or investment with no college background. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Matthew 25:20–26. The bag of silver represented any kind of resources we are given. God gives us time, gifts, and other resources according to
our abilities. The parable describes the consequences of two attitudes towards Christ's return. The person who diligently prepares in his or her
investing their time and talents to serve God will be rewarded and the person who has no heart for the work of God will be punished. When it comes
to America, in the recently news we have seen racism be a big part of our issues today. We watched what happened to Maryland in their communities,
how they began riots in April and started destroying their own communities because of the recently death of a young people like Freddie Gray. The
Baltimore Police Department suspended six officers with pay pending an investigation of Gray's

Standardized Test Process
The way I take a standardized test is the night before i will study the subject that will be in the test so I can be prepared when I am testing. There will
be some problems I struggle in when I am taking the test but I do my best to solve it out. I consider my self and good tester because because I am
always about 60% prepare when I have to take a test. I feel like I have always been a good tester because I feel like I am always prepared to take a test I
don't struggle as much when I am prepared. The way I prepare my self for a standardized test is I will ask the teacher to give me a few problems that
will be on the test to keep on practicing until I feel prepared. The night before I will review a few problems that I think will help me out

Standardized Testing Vs Standardized Tests
Knowledge is key, not test scores Learning is knowledge acquired through experience, study, or being taught. Most high schools require kids to pass
certain tests to graduate. Also, colleges require certain test scores to be admitted. Therefore, most teachers teach just to pass a test not for the actual fact
of learning. This way is wrong because not every person learns the same. Teachers who understand the meaning of being taught also understand that not
everybody learns the same, so colleges requiring certain tests and graduation tests need to be changed. Astandardized test is any examination that's
administered and scored in a predetermined standard manner (Kamenetez, 2014).The SAT and ACT are examples. There are two types of tests,... Show
Even in New jersey a dad had testified that his son was too stressed out from all the tests, as well as New York where the state union president
commented that parents should opt children out of taking tests (Taylor, Rich, 2015). Although over testing has been a problem for educators for years,
it has become even more of a problem recently with more standardized tests being added to the long list of what children already have to take. Some
teachers are taking a stand against the testing and refusing to administer the tests. Three teachers in P.S. 364 Earth School wrote a letter to the
administration about why they will not give Common Core tests (Strauss, 2014). They "can no longer implement policies that seek to transform the
broad promises of public education into a narrow obsession with the ranking and sorting of children" (Strauss, 2014). They aren't the only teachers who
feel this way, but most don't want to opt out because without scores, they can't thoroughly review a teacher. Some agree that the expectations are too
high, but don't understand how a teacher can't be impactful

Against Standardized Tests
Today is test day, an obstacle that in time will falsely decide a student's future academically and morally. He has one chance to portray his academic
performance in such limited time, having to forcefully disregard whether or not he is in fact emotionally prepped on the given day. There is an
unnecessary surplus of students who share such experiences, who too have had their dreams and talents ripped by automated grading. This tale is
nothing new, such senseless obstacles have troubled generations. Standardized tests are not a valid measurement of academic success and should be
discontinued due to their one–size fits all curriculum, inaccurate performance judgment on a given day, and inefficient test taking times.
Standardized tests should ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although standardized tests do not accurately represent a student's performance and future, they do present the opportunity to test an individual's
general knowledge. The tests also give students the chance to test their test–taking efficiency and time management, whether or not the individual is
under tremendous amounts of stress. With these assessments, students can rank their performance and improve for future tests.
These tests also balance the college attendance scale. Given that a number of colleges have various requirements plus a specific standardized test
composite, the college won't be flooded by new students. Ever since their debut in the United States in the early 1900's, deciphering the strong from
the weak has always been a primary purpose of these tests. In a way, this benefits colleges financially, and surely assists them in maintaing a much
more valuable impression to college–seeking individuals as they're harder to get into.
But in the end, discontinuing standardized testing would grace students with the ability to attend colleges, giving them the opportunity to show what
they couldn't show on scantron. Students would no longer be discouraged by a robotic grading on their performance. But most importantly, students
will be able to pursue their desired career and not have their talents

Standardized Testing Vs. Standardized Tests
After almost completing a semester in this class and observing in classrooms within the Staten Island elementary education system. I came to the
conclusion that most high stake assessments do not accurately reflect a student's knowledge of the material. Also, that low stake assessments often
are the best route to take because you can evaluate how much progress is being made and how much knowledge they have on the topic, without
the stress of a high stakes evaluation. Firstly, one very controversial topic in America: Standardized testing. There are two most common cons
associated with standardized tests. Firstly, standardized tests are not essential. Secondly, hypothetically speaking if standardized testing were a
resourceful scale to weigh a student's appropriate academic level, the costs correlated with these tests is too pricey. When you really break it down
Standardized tests are inefficient because they rarely show information we aren't already aware of. Ask any teacher and they can pick out which of
their students can read and write. That revelation usually comes in the shape of a letter or assessments that break down progress based on skills.
Prearranged high stakes and the associated high stakes pressure, people will develop a scheme. "And it is all too true that grades vary widely
because of four main factors: a teacher 's conception of achievement, a teacher 's sense of equity and rigor, a teacher 's ability to teach, and the
composition of students." (Jouriles,

Standardized Test Score
Throughout high school, students strive to do their best so they can go to the college of their dreams. They excel, and are straight A students with
perfect GPA's, several extracurricular activities, and many leadership positions. These students appear to be the perfect choice for any university.
Unfortunately, there might be one element that separates these students from his or her dream school– standardized test scores. This one test score could
be the difference between attending an Ivy League school or an average level school. In most cases, the best way to succeed on these tests is with the
help of expensive practice books or a tutor. However, many students cannot afford these tools, and as a result, will not do well. These tests are simply...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The reason for this is the desire to get into a great college so they can have a bright future. Countless hours of studying and time doing school
activities are some of the prices that must be paid, but in the end, it will all be worth it. Or will it? All those years of hard work could become
almost meaningless with just one simple test score. All Ivy League schools require and average ACT score of at least 32 for an applicant to even be
looked at with care. Although every other aspect of the students application may be perfect, if the ACT score is not up to par, then acceptance into a
prestigious university is highly unlikely. Throughout America, the opposition to standardized tests is increasing due to the negative effects they are
having on bright young students. These tests are taking these students years of hard work and basically throwing down the toilet. It just is not right to
have one test that bases how smart a student is, when there are so many other factors that should be looked at. Standardized tests should not be
required for college admission because they are an unreliable measure of a student's performance and are not as important as what was accomplished in
the students four years of high

Standardized Test Discriminatory
Standardized tests are discriminatory because they don't take cultural backgrounds, experiences, or personal lives into account, which leaves students at
a disadvantage, which is why standardized tests are more damaging than beneficial to students. According to www.commondreams.org, in New York
City, ELL students make up 14.4% of the student body population, and are expected to take a standardized exam between 7 and 8 times before
passing. Only about 39.1% of these students end up graduating from school because the test doesn't take their backgrounds into account. They haven't
fully learned the language, or properly know the full american schooling system yet. When students are put at this kind of disadvantage, this throws
them a curveball,

Standardized Test Validity
The Validity and Reliability of Standardized Tests and Their Ability to Accurately Measure Intelligence
Noah Robinson
Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth
Abstract
This paper examines standardized tests and what makes them an unreliable medium to gauge intelligence on. It analyzes what personality traits can
lead to alter test scores and how often these traits are completely unaccounted for. Test score differences based on economic status and ethnicity is also
discussed. It also explores how standardized tests usually only analyze one form of intelligence (fluid or crystallized) and thus is not an accurate
portrayal of a person's overall intellectual merit. The differences between the BIS (Berlin Model of Intelligence ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There are many aspects that go into intelligence, but unfortunately a few basic character traits of the people taking the test can either make or
break their score. For example, if someone has a reading disability and takes the test, then they can arrange for the test questions to be read to
them. But if the test taker is simply bad at reading, then their progress on the test will be significantly slowed, giving them a clear disadvantage as,
though they have no medically justified reason, they simply take longer to read the questions. The same goes for character traits which make it hard
to focus for long periods of time. While it may not be ADHD, these kind of traits can seriously affect how well someone does on a test. There are
more specific character traits that can lead to distinctions like this as well. For example, Smokers are worse at things like vocabulary and STM
(short–term memory). People who spend a lot of time playing computer games tend to have better STM and reasoning, causing them to test better.
Even anxiety plays a role and causes people to do worse on STM tests. Basic personality traits that have little to no effect on intelligence can greatly
affect a person's ability to score well on a

Standardized Test Diversity
"Standardized tests do not value diversity (15 Reasons) ." Standardized tests treat every person as if they are identical when in reality they are not
anywhere close to it. There are many differences in people, like cultural backgrounds, thinking and learning styles, different family backgrounds, and
different levels in the English language. Not everyone is the same, they are all different in some way (15 Reasons). Schools around the world should
not have standardized tests because they are time consuming and they do not show where a student is on an assessment.
Even though these tests are time consuming they judge the education of students'. Standardized tests should not be used to judge the education of a
student. The students' scores on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They do not show where a student is at in a subject and they are time consuming, there is other subjects for students to focus on and not the ones that
mean nothing and that they only need to learn to graduate. They need to study all the things that they will need after the graduate and go into the real
world. Taking away standardized tests will help the students focus on stuff they need for afterhigh school and not have to worry about if they are going
to graduate. It will cause less stress on the students and

Essay Standardized Tests
Do standardized tests destroy schools and fail prepare students for the real world? Our teacher's spend time on memorization of specific words that
will be on the state test, not vocabulary building exercises. They have pep rallies and time spent away from lesson plans to learning cheers on how the
students are going to do well on the test. Excess teacher and administration time is spent figuring out game plans, not for teaching students, but for
figuring out how to increase test scores. Meanwhile, when a student is truly excited about exploring a topic in depth, they are shut down because there
is no time to learn, only time to work on memorizing items that might be on these test. Standardized tests waste classroom time and do... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many high school students don't take these tests seriously, because many of them are at the same level of thinking as adults, and realize the tests are
flawed. Still they might not consider that these tests being flawed might lessen their chance of getting into college. Certainly one could envision a
system of standardized tests in which learning was at the center.
Standardized tests fail to predict the future success of students whether in the employment pool or continuing their education. When the No Child Left
Behind (NCLB) act was adopted in 2001 the consciences was it would increase student achievements level and the graduation rate of the United States.
The law allows for individual states to administer a standardized test to the students which would show the States improvement over the previous
year. In 2001 the national graduation rate was 72 %, six years later the graduation rate increased to 75% and while this shows a small increase it falls
short of the 78% in 1970 and comes far short of the 90% projected in the NCLB (Anderson, 2010). In 2007 the National Assessment of Educational
Progress, indicating that students in middle schools and secondary schools struggle to graduate because the students' literacy achievement is alarmingly
low. Only 1/3 of secondary school students who enter 9th grade each year can expect to graduate with the skills the students need to succeed in college
and the

Essay on Standardized Test
Standardized Test Standardized test have been a means measuring student performance. Some important questions that always come up regarding
standardized test are what are the tests really measuring? Are they measuring a person's intelligence? Their ability to perform well on standardized
tests? Or just some random quantity of the person's IQ? When examining the issues around which these tests are given and the content of the tests
themselves, it becomes apparent that however useful the tests may be for standardizing a group's intellectual ability, they are not a good indicator of
intelligence.
To issue a truly standardized test, the testing environment should be the same for everyone involved. A person's environment ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
What about physical intelligence, conversational intelligence, social intelligence, survival intelligence, and the others that go into everyday life? Why
are these important traits not figured into intelligence tests? Standardized tests certainly get predictable results where academics are concerned, but
they should not be considered good indicators of general intelligence because of the omissions they make in the testing process. To really gauge a
person's intelligence, it would be necessary to put them through a rigorous set of real–life trials and document their performance. The standardized IQ
tests of today are test only a limited quality of a person's character that can hardly be referred to as intelligence. Standardized test also have no way to
compensate for cultural differences. Different cultures have different methods of solving problems, and speediness is not always the best way to tackle
a problem. Therefore the time limitations on standardized test are a major drawback.
The reasons that IQ tests fail at their task can be separated into two main groups. The first grouping is where the tests assume too much. Examples of
this are the assumption that speed is always good, vocabulary is a good indicator of intelligence, and that different test taking environments won't affect
the outcome. The second grouping comes because the tests gauge the wrong items. Examples of this are different culture groups being asked to take the

Standardized Test Inaccurate
Should we modernize the standardized test? Some people say yes, we should ,and others say no we shouldn't. I Think they should modernize these
tests because the test can be inaccurate,takes up time and have poverty holes. Inaccurate. many tests that kids take and try their hardest at, and they
got a bad grade on it and it wasn't their fault, and the reason is that one teacher gave one of their students "stupid" work because of a bad grade on a
standardized test. The test don't let kid express their creativity and many other things that teacher teaches kids to do. So therefore its inaccurate. It takes
up time. many students take up 20–25 hours on a single standardized test! The reason why is because that it takes so long to just get one done,

Standardized Test Flaws
Stress, that is what all students go through when they have to take the Standardized Test. Kids stress out over these big Test called the Standardized
Test because they determine students future class. It can go all the way up to the High School where students would take the SAT that would determine
one's future. Also the kind of job people would get in the future. Kids are getting tired of the standardized test. People should take action and giving no
kids standardized test. Children are falling behind in schools. Students are failing their Standardized and messing up their education. Well unfortunately,
" Under No Child Left Behind, a significant number of schools did not see their test scores increase, the Federal Government

Standardized Test Taker
I sometimes do somewhat okay on standardized tests because I almost never prepare for the tests but whenever I do prepare for it I feel like I did really
good because I study what we did the entire semester or school year. I consider myself an okay test taker because I rarely study for them but sometimes
I do, I know that's not going to be a good thing in college or for the rest of high school. I used to be an excellent test taker in middle school and
elementary school but I just think that I've been slugging off in high school and I haven't completed all of my work so whenever we have tests I
never know what the answers are so I almost always fail them. I mostly always forget about tests, so the night before every test I'm unaware that there

Standardized Test Stress
Test Stress Ever since elementary school we have had to take tests. Most of these tests were simple and only had to do with one subject. Other tests
are rather large and consist of multiple subject and there is alloted time to take these tests. These tests are standard tests that are mandatory for
everyone in school to take. The purpose of the tests is to measure how well your education is going. Since you take them year after year you can see
how you are progressing in your intelligence. The only problem is that there is an enormous amount of weight placed on doing well on these tests.
Therefore classes give tests with similar format and questions. Students are also taught to be good test takers. With all this testing there can be
unnecessary stress put on students and teachers out of fear of doing poorly. Standardized testing, while a good measurement of learning, often puts
more stress on students than necessary. The earliest known use of a standardized test was in seventh century China for citizens applying for a
government job. Although that was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Bush in 2002. Ever since it was passed education has changed. Testing was required in grades 3 through 8 and again in 10th grade. If schools did not
show adequate progress through the years they had the risk of being taken over by the state or being shut down completely. With the law having
vigoruous standards in math and reading schools had to put all focus on those core subjects often leaving out time for valuable creativity time. In order
to encourage teachers and the schools the government offered rewards to those that achieved the high standards. That wasn't the only place the state
spent money though. They also increased spending on standardized tests themselves increasing it from $423 million before NCLB to $1.1 billion after.
Combined the state and federal government spent a record breaking $600 billion on the new

The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Test Scores
When different colleges and universities consider a student for their admission into their institution they primarily look at a student's standardized tests
scores. These scores could help, or hurt a student in their admission process into their desired college or university. However, standardized test scores
do not emit a full analysis of a student being admitted into a certain college or university. Some students are bad test takers, and don't perform well with
standardized tests, and everyone has different speeds. Overall, standardized tests don't supply enough analysis to show the type of student they could
possible be enrolling into their institution. Therefore, colleges should look at a students high school grades and extracurricular ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Studies show that if a student has at least one parent that has no high school diploma, the average score of those students on the Scholastic
Aptitude Test (also known as SAT) is 1288 out of a maximum 2400 points. (Editors of Perfect Score Project) High school students that have at
least one parent with a bachelor's degree at any college or university, is more likely to score an average of 1574 out of 2400 on the SAT's. (Editors
of Perfect Score Project) Students that have parents that have graduate degrees in their desired profession are more likely to score around the average
of 1687 out of 2400 points on the SAT's. (Editors of Perfect Score Project) This shows that the highereducation that a student's parent or parents may
have, the more likely it is for them to score higher on a standardized tests, and to get into their desired college. It is such a luxury to have parents who
pursued higher education. However, graduate degrees cost approximately $160,000 a year on average. (Education Portal) Most families living in the
United States don't even make that amount of money each ear. The average income for an American family is $51,900 a year. (Ben

Standardized Tests Should Be Abolished In Schools
Standardized Tests Should Be Abolished In Schools For millions of students across America, the arrival of springtime means one thing: time for
standardized tests. Students are often filled with dread over the thought of having to sit in stuffy, cramped rooms for hours at a time without snacks,
water, or breaks, in order to take a mind–numbing test for their school. After completing these time–sensitive, high pressure tests, they are used to
measure the average intelligence per school in each city, county, and state in the nation. Exams are repeated for days on end, taking away precious
in–class time from teachers, and legitimate learning opportunities from students of all ages. Standardized tests should be abolished in schools.
Firstly, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) set standards that only help children set at a distinct disadvantage. In an article written by the National
Bureau of Economic Research, it is stated "Further analysis shows that gains in sanctioned schools are concentrated among low– performing students...
We find no evidence ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Most state and nationally mandated tests are examining students growth in major areas, like mathematics, literary proficiency, and science. However,
students grow in many different areas that aren't conventionally tested, including, but not limited to, the performing arts, computer sciences, and
physical education. In an article written by the Penn Graduate School of Education, it is said: "In the best cases, high–stakes testing has focused
instruction toward important and developmentally appropriate literacy and numeracy skills – but at the expense of a narrower curricular experience for
students..." (Supovitz) The main ideas of this article highlighted the fact that well rounded students are developed through growth in multiple different
areas of learning, whereas standardized tests only examine growth in a few

Standardized Vs Standardized Test
Secondly, the standardized test does not teach you how succeed in a public setting, or how to make life changing difference. Public speaking is a
necessary to have when working in the job force, you'll need a good character and intelligence. Students could learn skills like teamwork, leadership,
public speaking, multitasking, and strategizing by joining clubs, and sports through their school. During your test you are in a quiet setting look at fifty
questions in some hours. There are no skills to learn besides test taking skills. Like many famous people they did not succeed by a test, they achieved
their goals by skills, friendships, and most importantly education.
Lastly, certain people learn different ways, some learn verbally, physically,

Essay On Standardized Test
This assignment taught me so much about obtaining a speech sample, administering a standardized test, and analyzing a child's speech. Prior to
doing this assignment, I had never obtained a speech sample from a child or administered a standardized test on a child. Both were very difficult and
I am very happy that I have experience now doing both. I do not think I obtained the best representative sample of the child's speech. I think I would
have elicited a better sample if I had obtained the sample after administering the standardized test. If I had administered the test first, I would have seen
what phonological and articulation errors the client made and then tried to elicit those errors in the sample. Because I started out with the sample, I
did not really know what I was looking for. In addition, I think I would have also gotten a better representative sample from the client if I did not use
books to elicit the sample. While I was able to elicit a sample using books, I think I would have gotten a better sample using material that had more
variability. With the books, I found that some of the child's utterances were very short perhaps if using a different material, such as blocks or toy cars,
would have elicited longer utterances. Administering the test to the child was more difficult then I... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Prior to doing this assignment, I was very nervous about having to do all of these steps. I was especially nervous about administering a standardized
test. Even after practicing multiple times on my family, I was nervous to administer the test to a child. Once I actually administering the test, I
realized that it was not as bad as I had thought. Next time I have to do this, I will be less nervous since I now have the practice. I have learned so
much from doing this assignment and I know the skills I have learned will help me in the

Standardized Test Analysis
On the standardized test I scored on the below section. I do not consider myself a good test taker because I lose trust and confidence in myself so
my mind goes blank. I haven't always been this way it normally started happening when I started middle school. To prepare for a standardized test I
go to sleep on time but before I do that I always check my notes and reread them. Test questions I do best on are the ones where there isn't word
problems. Normally just solving for x type of problems are easy if you know what correct steps to take. I struggle on word problems the most
because you have to first understand it and then you have to come up with the equation etc. English seems a lot more simpler because you just have to
read a passage and

Standardized Test
Standardized Test Do Not Measure Intelligence
We go to school for twelve years, and throughout those twelve years we learn many techniques and a variety of subjects. The techniques we learn in
elementary school we pursue it into middle school. Once finishing middle school everything becomes more challenging. Walking intohigh school is a
really big step, and also very stressful. Going into junior year and senior year is when you set your mind to different goals and you start asking
yourself "What college do I want to attend?" "Am I even capable of being successful in the career I want to persevere in?" All those questions depend
on a test score, throughout junior year every student is getting prepared for the test that relies on their future. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Social Studies, History, and for all intents and purposes, Science, are ignored, while topics such as advanced mathematics and English are elevated far
above their real world relevance. Science, while technically included in the ACT, is reduced to reading complicated graphs and interpreting their
results–– a tiny portion of what the field of science really amounts to. Important standardized test such as the ACT or SAT should rely more on
aesthetic subjects than just the basic subjects so students can be more interested in it, and they can actually show what they are capable off. Also,
having to sit in a classroom for hours, with people you may not even know and having to re–read an article because you can not focus can put a lot of
amount of stress on a student. Which, can also make students fail at taking a standardized test even if they are an intelligent person. "it's important to
remember that standardized tests don't measure intelligence. What they measure is how well a student can sit and take a test. They measure how well
students can learn the tricks to beat the system." (Lee 2015) The most important circumstance of taking a standardized test is how well someone can
memorize the steps and tricks not how intelligent someone

Standardized Tests In Education
Standardized tests don't inspire teachers nor students to go beyond what is expected, making them nothing but the common human being. Senior
Fellow, International Center for Leadership in Education (ICLE), Sheninger, Eric says" "Standardization follows in the footsteps of a century–old
education model focused on industrialization, which influences teachers and administrators in a way where the artist in each of them never evolves.
This entrenched system produces students that lack creativity, are fearful of failure, work extremely hard to follow directions (homework, study for
tests, not question authority), and are leaving schools with undesirable skills in a post–industrial society." Many artists, such as myself, have been
forced to do long nights of stressful math homework, mix with chemistry or writing a haiku. These activities causes our brains to overload as well as
our time, leading us artists to not be able to develop our talents and create the non–created. Artist are just an example, but there are many more... Show
"Ricken: Too Much Emphasis on Standardized Tests." Newsday. Newsday, 06 June 2013. Web. 05 May 2017.
Ricken, Robert. "Ricken: Too Much Emphasis on Standardized Tests." Newsday. Newsday, 06 June 2013. Web. 05 May 2017.
Sheninger, Eric. "Standardization Will Destroy OurEducation System, If It Hasn't Already."The Huffington Post, TheHuffingtonPost.com, 25 July 2012,
Geist, Eugene and Jennifer Hohn. "Encouraging Creativity in the Face of Administrative Convenience: How Our Schools Discourage Divergent
Thinking." Education, vol. 130, no. 1, Fall2009, pp. 141–150. EBSCOhost,
Schuster, Joshua. "The Fable, the Moral, and the Animal." Representing the Modern Animal in Culture, 5 Dec. 1940, pp. 1–2., doi:10.1057
/9781137428653.0013. Accessed 5 May 2017
Kn, Many kn. "– Standardized Tests – ProCon.org." ProConorg Headlines, Many Different People, 5 Aug. 2016, standardizedtests.procon.org
/view.answers.php?questionID. Accessed 10 May

Informative Essay On Standardized Tests

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Susan Myers

More from Susan Myers (8)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Informative Essay On Standardized Tests