SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 15
Download to read offline
Publishing
 Partnerships
  Presentation by
  Mark Robertson
Blackwell Publishing


  SSP, June 2006
What I will cover



• The market for our journal content in China

• Our journals publishing Chinese content for world
  consumption

• China as a publishing exporter




     2
Chinese or English as the language of science



• “By 2010 the dominant language of the internet will be
   Chinese.”
    – Major Consulting Co advertising, 2001

• “There are currently 110 million Chinese who are
   learning English compared with roughly 50,000
   Americans studying Chinese.”
    – Kirk and Larsen, Far Eastern Economic Review 2005




     3
1843 or 2005?



• “At no period in the history of the world has the
   attention of the civilized nations been so fully directed
   towards China, its early history and modern position,
   as at the present moment. The single fact that the
   nation comprises within its limits a population of 360
   millions of human beings is of itself sufficient to
   awaken the deepest degree of interest”.
    – Chinese Exhibition Catalogue, Philadelphia 1843




      4
Chinese academics’ attitudes towards foreign
scholarly journals


 Section summary
 •   93% agree with the statement foreign scholarly journals are important to my work
 •   Good access to such journals is not uniform: although the majority agree with
     the statement I have good access to foreign scholarly journals, 28% disagree.
 •   57% agree with the statement I would read foreign scholarly journals more if they
     were translated into Chinese.
 •   22% tend to read foreign journals more than Chinese journals in print format
 •   31% tend to read foreign electronic journals more than Chinese electronic
     journals



  “The Attitudes of Chinese Academics to Foreign Scholarly Journals” , PA Market
  Research Report, Mar 05




       5
Rapid rise in science funding

                                      50

                                      45
 Total Science Budget (Billion $US)




                                      40

                                      35

                                      30

                                      25

                                      20

                                      15

                                      10

                                      5

                                      0
                                      1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
                                                                    Year



                                           6
Brain gain
             “The model is simple: recruit
             top foreign-trained Chinese and
             Chinese-American specialists,
             set them up in well-equipped
             labs, surround them with the
             brightest students and give
             them tremendous leeway. In a
             minority of cases, they receive
             American-style pay; in others,
             they are lured by the cost of
             living, generous housing and
             the laboratories. How many
             have come is unclear.”

             Howard French, “China Luring Foreign Scholars To Make
             Its Universities Great” New York Times I, 28 Oct 05


    7
Brain drain


 “Approximately a third of those who go abroad are
 returning to China every year. As many as 7.5% of
 all American PhD holders in science and
 technology are citizens of the Peoples Republic of
 China and 25% of these return, up from 15% in
 recent years… 23 national chief scientists in China
 are returnees.”


 Source: 2004 Statistics of Chinese Scientific and Technical papers, ISTIC 2005




       8
Annual growth in papers in SCI listed journals




Source: 2004 Statistics of Chinese Scienftific and Technical papers, ISTIC 2005


           9
Top cited countries in period Jan 95-Aug05
Ra                                                                CITATIONS
     COUNTRY               PAPERS              CITATIONS
nk                                                                PER PAPER
 1   USA                           2,803,625        36,231,437            12.92

 2   ENGLAND                        633,123           7,097,782           11.21

 3   GERMANY                        705,953           6,928,683               9.81
 4   JAPAN                          759,989           5,898,079               7.76

 5   FRANCE                         513,387           4,847,515               9.44

 6   CANADA                         375,239           3,958,929           10.55
 7   ITALY                          344,759           3,084,580               8.95

 8   NETHERLANDS                    209,233           2,484,821           11.88

 9   AUSTRALIA                      232,423           2,086,047               8.98
10   SWITZERLAND                    149,375           2,028,778           13.58

11   SWEDEN                         162,696           1,841,611           11.32

12   SPAIN                          240,618           1,810,352               7.52
13   SCOTLAND                         98,816          1,129,560           11.43

14   PEOPLES R CHINA                340,206           1,129,014               3.32

15   BELGIUM                        110,151           1,112,803               10.1




      Source: ISI Essential Science Indicators, November 2005


       10
Why Chinese authors submit to journals
       Attribute             Very important           Important            Very important +
                                                                              important
High quality of the              78%                     15%                      93%
content
High quality peer                62%                     25%                      87%
review process
Citation metrics (e.g.           46%                     30%                      76%
impact factor)
Electronic access to             46%                     27%                      73%
the journal
Good reputation of the           40%                     40%                      80%
journal

             Attribute              Not at all        Somewhat           Not at all important +
                                   important         unimportant              somewhat
                                                                             unimportant
Chinese academics on the               9%                28%                      37%
journal’s editorial board
History of Chinese authors             6%                24%                      30%
publishing in the journal
International readership               3%                17%                      20%

Source: Publishers’ Association survey of Chinese authors, March 05, by Key Perspectives

        11
Reasons for submission by Chinese authors
international journals


•     Journal has a good reputation                                               72%
•     Specific subject area covered by the journal                                59%
•     High impact factor                                                          44%
•     Fast time to publication                                                    33%
•     Publisher has a good reputation                                             24%
•     Good previous experience with journal                                       22%
•     Journal was recommended by a colleague                                      17%
•     Journal offers English-language correction service                          10%
•     Relationship with journal, editor or society                                 9%




    Source: Blackwell Publishing survey of Chinese authors to Blackwell journals, June 2005


            12
Enablers/ barriers to submissions from China


• 94% agree publishing in foreign scholarly journals beneficial
  to academic career in China
• Yet only 29% submitted to a foreign journal in the past 12
  months
• Barriers to submitting articles
    – 48% said writing in English is not easy,
    – 45% said publishing in Chinese journals is easier
    – 36% reported that it can be difficult to communicate with the
         publisher
    –    56% want the publishing process explained more clearly




  Source: Publishers’ Association survey of Chinese authors, March 05, by Key Perspectives

          13
The oldest publishing industry in the world
but with the greatest potential




     14
THANK YOU




Any Questions ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?




    15

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

49 david levy
49 david levy49 david levy
49 david levy
 
73 libraries 2
73 libraries 273 libraries 2
73 libraries 2
 
188 sspcc4 e_hart
188 sspcc4 e_hart188 sspcc4 e_hart
188 sspcc4 e_hart
 
392 2011 fallseminar_bethgallagher
392 2011 fallseminar_bethgallagher392 2011 fallseminar_bethgallagher
392 2011 fallseminar_bethgallagher
 
198 ssp seminar05_nolan
198 ssp seminar05_nolan198 ssp seminar05_nolan
198 ssp seminar05_nolan
 
369 diane bartoli
369 diane bartoli369 diane bartoli
369 diane bartoli
 
172 sspcc1 d_poznansky
172 sspcc1 d_poznansky172 sspcc1 d_poznansky
172 sspcc1 d_poznansky
 
165 sspcc1 a_stanley
165 sspcc1 a_stanley165 sspcc1 a_stanley
165 sspcc1 a_stanley
 
174 sspcc2 a_wills
174 sspcc2 a_wills174 sspcc2 a_wills
174 sspcc2 a_wills
 
192 sspp02 scott
192 sspp02 scott192 sspp02 scott
192 sspp02 scott
 
03112014 ssp webinar_printondemand_terrilewandowski
03112014 ssp webinar_printondemand_terrilewandowski03112014 ssp webinar_printondemand_terrilewandowski
03112014 ssp webinar_printondemand_terrilewandowski
 
397 seth maislinpresentation
397 seth maislinpresentation397 seth maislinpresentation
397 seth maislinpresentation
 
57 hemenway
57 hemenway57 hemenway
57 hemenway
 
91 pepper
91 pepper91 pepper
91 pepper
 
314 chuck richardpresentation
314 chuck richardpresentation314 chuck richardpresentation
314 chuck richardpresentation
 
176 sspcc2 e_hart
176 sspcc2 e_hart176 sspcc2 e_hart
176 sspcc2 e_hart
 
312 john lester
312 john lester312 john lester
312 john lester
 
282 mombru
282 mombru282 mombru
282 mombru
 
291 toby greenssp_may2008
291 toby greenssp_may2008291 toby greenssp_may2008
291 toby greenssp_may2008
 
142 wendy shank
142 wendy shank142 wendy shank
142 wendy shank
 

Similar to 164 sspcc1 a_robertson

Poster Presentation.pptx
Poster Presentation.pptxPoster Presentation.pptx
Poster Presentation.pptxWasiqAli28
 
2011 OMT Division Business Meeting
2011 OMT Division Business Meeting2011 OMT Division Business Meeting
2011 OMT Division Business MeetingOMT Division
 
Wikipedia in outreach
Wikipedia in outreachWikipedia in outreach
Wikipedia in outreachmblso
 
Rebecca E. Cooney MedicReS World Congress 2015
Rebecca E. Cooney MedicReS World Congress 2015Rebecca E. Cooney MedicReS World Congress 2015
Rebecca E. Cooney MedicReS World Congress 2015MedicReS
 
2010 OMT Division Business Meeting
2010 OMT Division Business Meeting2010 OMT Division Business Meeting
2010 OMT Division Business MeetingOMT Division
 
Open-Access Mega-Journals (OAMJ): initial results presented at 2016 RLUK conf...
Open-Access Mega-Journals (OAMJ): initial results presented at 2016 RLUK conf...Open-Access Mega-Journals (OAMJ): initial results presented at 2016 RLUK conf...
Open-Access Mega-Journals (OAMJ): initial results presented at 2016 RLUK conf...Valérie Spezi
 
Comunicação da produção científica na Sociedade de Informação: novos desafios
Comunicação da produção científica na Sociedade de Informação: novos desafios Comunicação da produção científica na Sociedade de Informação: novos desafios
Comunicação da produção científica na Sociedade de Informação: novos desafios Edilson Damasio
 
Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015
Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015
Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015Martijn Roelandse
 
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authorsEditage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authorsCrossref
 
tidsrdhoxss2012
tidsrdhoxss2012tidsrdhoxss2012
tidsrdhoxss2012Eric Meyer
 
Guiding Principles in an Evolving Research Publishing Landscape (Deborah Wyatt)
Guiding Principles in an Evolving Research Publishing Landscape (Deborah Wyatt)Guiding Principles in an Evolving Research Publishing Landscape (Deborah Wyatt)
Guiding Principles in an Evolving Research Publishing Landscape (Deborah Wyatt)C0pe
 
Patterns of inequality in knowledge production: academic journals in the fiel...
Patterns of inequality in knowledge production: academic journals in the fiel...Patterns of inequality in knowledge production: academic journals in the fiel...
Patterns of inequality in knowledge production: academic journals in the fiel...Sarah Cummings
 
A new role for libraries in research assessments
A new role for libraries in research assessmentsA new role for libraries in research assessments
A new role for libraries in research assessmentsWouter Gerritsma
 
Cstam Jour Potential Print
Cstam Jour Potential PrintCstam Jour Potential Print
Cstam Jour Potential Printzm0120
 
OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012
OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012
OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012OAPENUK
 
McLinden aea applying Social network analysis to analyze the network of ideas...
McLinden aea applying Social network analysis to analyze the network of ideas...McLinden aea applying Social network analysis to analyze the network of ideas...
McLinden aea applying Social network analysis to analyze the network of ideas...Daniel McLinden
 
CILIP School Libraries Group Nov 2015
CILIP School Libraries Group Nov 2015CILIP School Libraries Group Nov 2015
CILIP School Libraries Group Nov 2015EISLibrarian
 

Similar to 164 sspcc1 a_robertson (20)

Poster Presentation.pptx
Poster Presentation.pptxPoster Presentation.pptx
Poster Presentation.pptx
 
2011 OMT Division Business Meeting
2011 OMT Division Business Meeting2011 OMT Division Business Meeting
2011 OMT Division Business Meeting
 
Wikipedia in outreach
Wikipedia in outreachWikipedia in outreach
Wikipedia in outreach
 
Rebecca E. Cooney MedicReS World Congress 2015
Rebecca E. Cooney MedicReS World Congress 2015Rebecca E. Cooney MedicReS World Congress 2015
Rebecca E. Cooney MedicReS World Congress 2015
 
2010 OMT Division Business Meeting
2010 OMT Division Business Meeting2010 OMT Division Business Meeting
2010 OMT Division Business Meeting
 
Open-Access Mega-Journals (OAMJ): initial results presented at 2016 RLUK conf...
Open-Access Mega-Journals (OAMJ): initial results presented at 2016 RLUK conf...Open-Access Mega-Journals (OAMJ): initial results presented at 2016 RLUK conf...
Open-Access Mega-Journals (OAMJ): initial results presented at 2016 RLUK conf...
 
Comunicação da produção científica na Sociedade de Informação: novos desafios
Comunicação da produção científica na Sociedade de Informação: novos desafios Comunicação da produção científica na Sociedade de Informação: novos desafios
Comunicação da produção científica na Sociedade de Informação: novos desafios
 
46 clarke
46 clarke46 clarke
46 clarke
 
Normalizing twitter
Normalizing twitterNormalizing twitter
Normalizing twitter
 
Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015
Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015
Changing landscape of the publishing world - NUS Singapore 2015
 
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authorsEditage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
Editage Workshop: Helping journals and publishers get closer to authors
 
tidsrdhoxss2012
tidsrdhoxss2012tidsrdhoxss2012
tidsrdhoxss2012
 
0920 wed lomond mabe
0920 wed lomond mabe0920 wed lomond mabe
0920 wed lomond mabe
 
Guiding Principles in an Evolving Research Publishing Landscape (Deborah Wyatt)
Guiding Principles in an Evolving Research Publishing Landscape (Deborah Wyatt)Guiding Principles in an Evolving Research Publishing Landscape (Deborah Wyatt)
Guiding Principles in an Evolving Research Publishing Landscape (Deborah Wyatt)
 
Patterns of inequality in knowledge production: academic journals in the fiel...
Patterns of inequality in knowledge production: academic journals in the fiel...Patterns of inequality in knowledge production: academic journals in the fiel...
Patterns of inequality in knowledge production: academic journals in the fiel...
 
A new role for libraries in research assessments
A new role for libraries in research assessmentsA new role for libraries in research assessments
A new role for libraries in research assessments
 
Cstam Jour Potential Print
Cstam Jour Potential PrintCstam Jour Potential Print
Cstam Jour Potential Print
 
OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012
OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012
OAPEN-UK presentation at ICOLC 2012
 
McLinden aea applying Social network analysis to analyze the network of ideas...
McLinden aea applying Social network analysis to analyze the network of ideas...McLinden aea applying Social network analysis to analyze the network of ideas...
McLinden aea applying Social network analysis to analyze the network of ideas...
 
CILIP School Libraries Group Nov 2015
CILIP School Libraries Group Nov 2015CILIP School Libraries Group Nov 2015
CILIP School Libraries Group Nov 2015
 

More from Society for Scholarly Publishing

04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_caitlinmeadows
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_caitlinmeadows04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_caitlinmeadows
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_caitlinmeadowsSociety for Scholarly Publishing
 
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_bruceheterick
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_bruceheterick04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_bruceheterick
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_bruceheterickSociety for Scholarly Publishing
 

More from Society for Scholarly Publishing (20)

10052016 ssp seminar2_newsham
10052016 ssp seminar2_newsham10052016 ssp seminar2_newsham
10052016 ssp seminar2_newsham
 
10052016 ssp seminar2_rivera
10052016 ssp seminar2_rivera10052016 ssp seminar2_rivera
10052016 ssp seminar2_rivera
 
10052016 ssp seminar2_pesanelli
10052016 ssp seminar2_pesanelli10052016 ssp seminar2_pesanelli
10052016 ssp seminar2_pesanelli
 
10052016 ssp seminar2_harley
10052016 ssp seminar2_harley10052016 ssp seminar2_harley
10052016 ssp seminar2_harley
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_myers
10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_myers10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_myers
10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_myers
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_demers
10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_demers10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_demers
10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_demers
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_cochran
10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_cochran10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_cochran
10042016 ssp seminar1_session4_cochran
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_stanley
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_stanley10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_stanley
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_stanley
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_ranganathan
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_ranganathan10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_ranganathan
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_ranganathan
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_odike
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_odike10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_odike
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_odike
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_cochran
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_cochran10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_cochran
10042016 ssp seminar1_session3_cochran
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_walker
10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_walker10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_walker
10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_walker
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_ivins
10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_ivins10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_ivins
10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_ivins
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_holland
10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_holland10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_holland
10042016 ssp seminar1_session2_holland
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_stanley
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_stanley10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_stanley
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_stanley
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_keane
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_keane10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_keane
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_keane
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_ivins
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_ivins10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_ivins
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_ivins
 
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_asadilari
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_asadilari10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_asadilari
10042016 ssp seminar1_session1_asadilari
 
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_caitlinmeadows
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_caitlinmeadows04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_caitlinmeadows
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_caitlinmeadows
 
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_bruceheterick
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_bruceheterick04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_bruceheterick
04142015 ssp webinar_theworldisflatforscholarlypublishing_bruceheterick
 

164 sspcc1 a_robertson

  • 1. Publishing Partnerships Presentation by Mark Robertson Blackwell Publishing SSP, June 2006
  • 2. What I will cover • The market for our journal content in China • Our journals publishing Chinese content for world consumption • China as a publishing exporter 2
  • 3. Chinese or English as the language of science • “By 2010 the dominant language of the internet will be Chinese.” – Major Consulting Co advertising, 2001 • “There are currently 110 million Chinese who are learning English compared with roughly 50,000 Americans studying Chinese.” – Kirk and Larsen, Far Eastern Economic Review 2005 3
  • 4. 1843 or 2005? • “At no period in the history of the world has the attention of the civilized nations been so fully directed towards China, its early history and modern position, as at the present moment. The single fact that the nation comprises within its limits a population of 360 millions of human beings is of itself sufficient to awaken the deepest degree of interest”. – Chinese Exhibition Catalogue, Philadelphia 1843 4
  • 5. Chinese academics’ attitudes towards foreign scholarly journals Section summary • 93% agree with the statement foreign scholarly journals are important to my work • Good access to such journals is not uniform: although the majority agree with the statement I have good access to foreign scholarly journals, 28% disagree. • 57% agree with the statement I would read foreign scholarly journals more if they were translated into Chinese. • 22% tend to read foreign journals more than Chinese journals in print format • 31% tend to read foreign electronic journals more than Chinese electronic journals “The Attitudes of Chinese Academics to Foreign Scholarly Journals” , PA Market Research Report, Mar 05 5
  • 6. Rapid rise in science funding 50 45 Total Science Budget (Billion $US) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year 6
  • 7. Brain gain “The model is simple: recruit top foreign-trained Chinese and Chinese-American specialists, set them up in well-equipped labs, surround them with the brightest students and give them tremendous leeway. In a minority of cases, they receive American-style pay; in others, they are lured by the cost of living, generous housing and the laboratories. How many have come is unclear.” Howard French, “China Luring Foreign Scholars To Make Its Universities Great” New York Times I, 28 Oct 05 7
  • 8. Brain drain “Approximately a third of those who go abroad are returning to China every year. As many as 7.5% of all American PhD holders in science and technology are citizens of the Peoples Republic of China and 25% of these return, up from 15% in recent years… 23 national chief scientists in China are returnees.” Source: 2004 Statistics of Chinese Scientific and Technical papers, ISTIC 2005 8
  • 9. Annual growth in papers in SCI listed journals Source: 2004 Statistics of Chinese Scienftific and Technical papers, ISTIC 2005 9
  • 10. Top cited countries in period Jan 95-Aug05 Ra CITATIONS COUNTRY PAPERS CITATIONS nk PER PAPER 1 USA 2,803,625 36,231,437 12.92 2 ENGLAND 633,123 7,097,782 11.21 3 GERMANY 705,953 6,928,683 9.81 4 JAPAN 759,989 5,898,079 7.76 5 FRANCE 513,387 4,847,515 9.44 6 CANADA 375,239 3,958,929 10.55 7 ITALY 344,759 3,084,580 8.95 8 NETHERLANDS 209,233 2,484,821 11.88 9 AUSTRALIA 232,423 2,086,047 8.98 10 SWITZERLAND 149,375 2,028,778 13.58 11 SWEDEN 162,696 1,841,611 11.32 12 SPAIN 240,618 1,810,352 7.52 13 SCOTLAND 98,816 1,129,560 11.43 14 PEOPLES R CHINA 340,206 1,129,014 3.32 15 BELGIUM 110,151 1,112,803 10.1 Source: ISI Essential Science Indicators, November 2005 10
  • 11. Why Chinese authors submit to journals Attribute Very important Important Very important + important High quality of the 78% 15% 93% content High quality peer 62% 25% 87% review process Citation metrics (e.g. 46% 30% 76% impact factor) Electronic access to 46% 27% 73% the journal Good reputation of the 40% 40% 80% journal Attribute Not at all Somewhat Not at all important + important unimportant somewhat unimportant Chinese academics on the 9% 28% 37% journal’s editorial board History of Chinese authors 6% 24% 30% publishing in the journal International readership 3% 17% 20% Source: Publishers’ Association survey of Chinese authors, March 05, by Key Perspectives 11
  • 12. Reasons for submission by Chinese authors international journals • Journal has a good reputation 72% • Specific subject area covered by the journal 59% • High impact factor 44% • Fast time to publication 33% • Publisher has a good reputation 24% • Good previous experience with journal 22% • Journal was recommended by a colleague 17% • Journal offers English-language correction service 10% • Relationship with journal, editor or society 9% Source: Blackwell Publishing survey of Chinese authors to Blackwell journals, June 2005 12
  • 13. Enablers/ barriers to submissions from China • 94% agree publishing in foreign scholarly journals beneficial to academic career in China • Yet only 29% submitted to a foreign journal in the past 12 months • Barriers to submitting articles – 48% said writing in English is not easy, – 45% said publishing in Chinese journals is easier – 36% reported that it can be difficult to communicate with the publisher – 56% want the publishing process explained more clearly Source: Publishers’ Association survey of Chinese authors, March 05, by Key Perspectives 13
  • 14. The oldest publishing industry in the world but with the greatest potential 14
  • 15. THANK YOU Any Questions ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 15