Ziauddin Barani and Abul Fazal were two Muslim thinkers from different eras who had differing views on religion and the role of the king. Barani lived in a time when Islam was establishing roots in India and advocated for the superiority of Islam. Abul Fazal lived during the religiously diverse Mughal Empire and promoted religious equality and secularism. Both believed justice was important for a king, but Barani tied it more closely to Islamic law while Abul Fazal focused on welfare. They similarly saw value in strong armies but Barani emphasized expansion more.
This presentation is prepared for the Graduation students to get basic idea and general information’s regarding the topic. Overall content of presentations is not through and complete, also required further additions.
Sovereignty means the supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable power by which any independent state is governed; supreme political authority; the supreme will; paramount control of the constitution and frame of government and its administration; the self-sufficient source of political power, from which all specific political powers are derived; the international independence of a state, combined with the right and power of regulating its internal affairs without foreign dictation; also a political society, or state, which is sovereign and independent.
The power to do everything in a state without accountability, to other countries, to execute and to apply them, to impose and collect taxes and levy contributions, to make war or peace, to form treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign nations.
The concept of ‘sovereignty’ is one of the most complex, with many definitions, some are totally contradictory. Usually, sovereignty is defined in one of two ways. The first definition applies to supreme public power, which has the right and, in theory, the capacity to impose its authority in the last instance. The second definition refers to the holder of legitimate power, who is recognized to have authority.
When national sovereignty is discussed, the first definition applies, and it refers in particular to independence, understood as the freedom of a collective entity to act. When popular sovereignty is discussed, the second definition applies, and sovereignty is associated with power and legitimacy.1
There are various definition of sovereignty which has been defined by academicians and philosophers they are as follows:
In political science, sovereignty is usually defined as the most essential attribute of the state in the form of its complete self-sufficiency in the frames of a certain territory that is its supremacy in the domestic policy and independence in the foreign one.
John Bodin defines sovereignty “The supreme power over citizens and subjects, unrestrained by law.”
Grotius defines sovereignty as “The supreme political power vested in him whose acts are not subject to any other and whose will cannot be overridden”.
Also definition of Sovereignty by Soltau is “Final legal coercive power by the state”.
This presentation is prepared for the Graduation students to get basic idea and general information’s regarding the topic. Overall content of presentations is not through and complete, also required further additions.
Sovereignty means the supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable power by which any independent state is governed; supreme political authority; the supreme will; paramount control of the constitution and frame of government and its administration; the self-sufficient source of political power, from which all specific political powers are derived; the international independence of a state, combined with the right and power of regulating its internal affairs without foreign dictation; also a political society, or state, which is sovereign and independent.
The power to do everything in a state without accountability, to other countries, to execute and to apply them, to impose and collect taxes and levy contributions, to make war or peace, to form treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign nations.
The concept of ‘sovereignty’ is one of the most complex, with many definitions, some are totally contradictory. Usually, sovereignty is defined in one of two ways. The first definition applies to supreme public power, which has the right and, in theory, the capacity to impose its authority in the last instance. The second definition refers to the holder of legitimate power, who is recognized to have authority.
When national sovereignty is discussed, the first definition applies, and it refers in particular to independence, understood as the freedom of a collective entity to act. When popular sovereignty is discussed, the second definition applies, and sovereignty is associated with power and legitimacy.1
There are various definition of sovereignty which has been defined by academicians and philosophers they are as follows:
In political science, sovereignty is usually defined as the most essential attribute of the state in the form of its complete self-sufficiency in the frames of a certain territory that is its supremacy in the domestic policy and independence in the foreign one.
John Bodin defines sovereignty “The supreme power over citizens and subjects, unrestrained by law.”
Grotius defines sovereignty as “The supreme political power vested in him whose acts are not subject to any other and whose will cannot be overridden”.
Also definition of Sovereignty by Soltau is “Final legal coercive power by the state”.
This PPT helps to understand Concept of Sovereignty. This PPT is more useful for Social Science students including Law at Graduate & Post bGrauat elevel .
This PPT helps to understand Concept of Sovereignty. This PPT is more useful for Social Science students including Law at Graduate & Post bGrauat elevel .
An Essay About Akbar
Akbar Essay
Characteristics Of Akbar
The Mughal Empire
Excerpt Of The King Akbar
Why Is Akbar Powerful
Mughal Emperor Akbar
Akbar Research Paper
Ruler Akbar of the Mughal Empire was the most well-known emperor for his religious
tolerance and reforms in the late 1500s. While Europe was engulfed in the flames of the
Inquisition Era, in the Indian subcontinent, Akbar was determined to create his kingdom a
haven of peace and togetherness.
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
Ziauddin Barani and Abul Fazal ( A comparative study)
1. PREPARED BY:SAQIB FIKREE AND NISAR
AHMAD KAMRAN
ROLL NO:872&871
BA(H) POLITICAL SCIENCE, 5 TH SEMESTER.
RAMANUJAN COLLEGE,UNIVERSITY OF DELHI.
Comparative study of two Muslim
thinkers(ZIA BARANI&ABUL FAZAL).
2. THREE BASIC PRINCIPLES
The divine law, Shariat based on
Quran.
The historical traditions of the
early years.
The consensus and solidarity of
the Islamic community.
3. INTRODUCTION
Ziauddin Barani:
Pre_mughal era , khilji dynasty.
Got education in Arabic and Persian.
Well educated in Islamic theology and history.
Abul Fazal:
Mughal era.
Well educated family background.
Popular historian.
4. CONTEXT
Ziauddin Barani:
Lived in a period when Islam was finding
its roots.
Population was still hostile to it.
There was a clear antipathy to all local
religions.
Religious enthusiasm was combined with
messianic zeal.
5. Continues
Abul Fazal:
Living in a period when Islam was at its
best.
Mughal empire period was peaceful,
religious and cultural flourishing between
Hindus and Muslims.
New structure gave rise to novel integral
culture, that had elements from both Hindu
and Muslim thoughts.
6. IDEAL KING
Barani made distinction between the personal
life of the king and his political role.
King should be noble born, ideal person,
belonging to the family of monarchs with
innate sense of justice.
For Abul Fazal king should work for the
welfare of the people, should have tolerance,
strong sense of justice, provide stability, and
ensure economic prosperity.
7. RELIGION
Both Abul Fazal and Barani had totally
different views on religion.
Barani was more conservative and
fundamentalist as compared to Abul Fazal.
Abul Fazal religious thoughts were based
on equality of all and secularism.
while Barani insisted on superiority of
Islam.
8. Abul Fazal was influenced by composite
culture of his time. Abul Fazal: King should
not depend on religion as society is Poly
religious.
Abul Fazal was influenced by composite
culture of his time.
Abul Fazal did not consider Islam superior.
Islamic community called Abul Fazal as a
kafir, rebel, Hindu and Agnipujak.
continues
9. JUSTICE
Justice was An essential element for both Barani
and Abul Fazal.
For Abul Fazal the foremost duty of the king is to
establish justice.
Barani argued that justice should be based on
koranic laws.
He believed that without justice, the koranic laws
are arbitrary decrees.
Barani “Everything against Quran is tyranny”
10. RATIONALITY
Barani is against rationality that goes against Quran.
For him philosopher and rationales are internal
enemies.
Science should not be as a subject method of the
education at all.
Supremacy of Quran, prophet teachings, and religious
laws.
Abul Fazal accepted rationality in the affairs of the
government.
For him all subjects are equal in claim for benevolence
and rationality.
11. Governance and sovereignty
In the political field their views are same.
Both were concerned with social stability.
According to Barani anyone who is capable
to have more influence than king, king loses
sovereignty.
Necessary element for sovereignty:
12. CONTINUES
1:enforcement of Shariat. 2:check on
immoral and sinful acts. 3: dispensing of
justice.
According to Abul Fazal king should
establish sovereignty by considering
himself as agent of the God.
King can lose his sovereignty by
discrimination on the basis of caste,
religion, class…..
13. Army
Both believed in strong army.
For Barani the sultanate ultimately rest on the power
the army.
Main functions of the army is security and expansion of
the state.
King should have great care in its efficiency, checking
corruption, and conspiracies.
Qalb an army for protection of the king.
Abul Fazal: king should have strong army.
For smooth functioning of administration.
Cavalry, infantry, artillery, camel, and elephants.
14. TO CONCLUDE:
Both Abul Fazal and Barani have typical elements in their
thoughts.
Barani had two anxieties. 1: to maintain status quo. 2: use of
terror should be constrained in relation to status groups.
These anxieties are not present in Fazal thoughts.
Fazal was concerned with two things, Benevolence and
rationality.
Barani state was located at force, while Fazal state was not
located at force.
Barani state was based on theology, but Fazal state was not
based on theology.
Barani insistence on force is much practical and realistic.
Fazal state seems to be idealistic.