SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
BRIEFING	NOTE	FOR	EXECUTIVE	DIRECTOR:	
2016	SURVEY	RESULTS	ON	PARTICIPANT	NEEDS	AND	FEEDBACK	
	
PURPOSE	
The	purpose	of	this	note	is	to	inform	the	Executive	Director	of	West	Side	Family	Place	of	the	2016	
Participant	Survey:	a	summary	most	significant	results	and	recommendations.	The	survey	results	from	
parent	and	caregiver	feedback	are	critical	for	grant	proposals,	and	strategic	planning	at	a	means	of	
continuously	improving	the	daily	drop-in	sessions,	parenting	programs,	and	other	aspects	of	West	Side	
Family	Place.		
	
SURVEY	METHODOLOGY	
The	survey	was	conducted	during	a	three-week	period	from	June	13th
	to	July	1st
	when	many	different	
programs	 were	 taking	 place	 so	 that	 a	 wide	 variety	 of	 participants,	 including	 drop-in	 and	 program	
participants,	had	the	opportunity	to	participate	in	the	survey.	There	was	only	one	respondent	from	each	
family	participating	in	the	survey.	Surveys	were	anonymous	and	any	identifying	information	was	kept	
strictly	confidential.		
	
Survey	Objectives	included:	
• Measuring	participant	satisfaction	with	staff,	drop-in	programs,	parent	programs,	and	more	to	
provide	 an	 accurate,	 representative	 picture	 of	 participants’	 experiences	 and	 continuously	
improve	Family	Place’s	programs	and	services.	
• Measuring	 participant	 demographics	 in	 order	 to	 have	 a	 representative	 sample	 of	 the	 entire	
participant	population,	including	caregivers,	nannies	and	family	members	as	caregivers.	
• Measuring	child	development	opportunities	and	improvements	related	to	WSFP	programs	and	
services.			
• Having	at	least	80	parents	and	40	caregivers	participate	in	the	survey.	This	quota	was	met	and	a	
total	of	131	participant	surveys	were	completed.		
	
We	provide	a	2-year	comparison	for	every	year	when	possible.	Please	take	note	that	there	were	slight	
question	changes	between	2015	and	2016,	resulting	in	some	questions	not	being	comparable.		
	
Evaluation	is	an	ongoing	process	at	Family	Place.	In	addition	to	the	annual	survey,	member	/	participant	
feedback	is	received	through	individual	program	evaluations,	informal	conversations	with	staff,	volunteer	
evaluations	and	staff	evaluations.		
	
SURVEY	FINDINGS	
The	following	survey	findings	are	the	most	significant	statistical	findings	from	2015	and	2016.	
1. In	2016,	100%	of	parents	either	strongly	agree	or	agree	that	they	feel	welcomed	or	accepted	at	
WSFP	compared	to	94%	in	2015.	
2. In	2016,	100%	of	parents	either	strongly	agree	or	agree	that	staff	treat	members	with	respect	
compared	to	98%	in	2015.	
3. In	2016,	less	caregivers	responded	strongly	agree	at	a	decreased	margin	of	3-16%	compared	to	
2015	regarding	caregiver	welcome	and	acceptance,	staff	respectability,	and	program	opportunities	
and	participation.	
4. In	2016,	more	caregivers	did	not	respond	 or	responded	with	Does	Not	Apply	to	11	out	of	16	
questions	targeted	for	caregivers	compared	to	2015.	The	majority	did	not	respond.
5. In	2016,	less	parents	and	caregivers	responded	strongly	agree	to	making	friends	and	connections	
at	WSFP	with	30%	parents	and	46%	caregivers	responding	strongly	agree	in	2015	compared	to	20%	
parents	and	39%	caregivers	responding	strongly	agree	in	2016.	
6. In	2016,	24%	of	parents	strongly	agree	that	they	have	become	more	aware	of	the	services	and	
resources	available	in	the	community	compared	to	32%	in	2015.	
7. In	2016,	73%	of	parents	have	a	University	Degree	or	Postgraduate	Degree.	
8. In	2016,	59%	of	caregivers	indicated	they	come	to	Family	Place	1-2	times	per	week	compared	to	
58%	in	2015.		
	
RECCOMMENDATIONS	AND	NEXT	STEPS	
	
After	reviewing	the	2016	Participant	Survey:	a	summary,	three	main	recommendations	were	found	in	
the	report:		
1. A	few	families	(6)	would	like	to	have	more	drop-in	hours,	particularly	in	the	afternoons	to	
accommodate	their	child’s	varying	needs	and	schedules.		
Long	term	solution:	conducting	a	feasibility	and	demographics	study	to	indicate	the	needs	of	the	
community	and	the	funding	necessary	to	see	the	possibility	of	extending	drop-in	hours	or	adding	an	
afternoon	drop-in	session.			
2. A	few	families	(4)	explained	they	would	like	to	see	an	earlier	circle	time	schedule	due	to	their	
child’s	varying	nap	schedule.	
Long	term	solution:	conducting	a	feasibility	and	demographics	study	to	indicate	the	needs	of	the	
community	and	the	funding	necessary	to	meet	those	needs.	
3. A	few	families	(3)	expressed	they	would	like	to	have	a	larger	space,	which	would	essentially	
solve	the	issue	of	overcrowding	when	the	place	gets	quite	busy.	
Long	term	solution:	conducting	a	feasibility	and	demographics	study	to	explore	the	possibilities	and	
opportunities	of	a	WSFP	Satellite	Program.		
After	reviewing	the	2016	Participant	Survey:	a	summary,	one	personal	observation	made	was:		
	
1. In	2016,	more	caregivers	did	not	respond	or	responded	with	Does	Not	Apply	to	11	out	of	16	
questions	targeted	for	caregivers	compared	to	2015.	The	majority	did	not	respond.	
Short	term	solution:	making	the	2017	survey	available	online	to	receive	a	higher	response	rate,	and	
less	questions	left	blank.	
The	majority	of	survey	participants	commented	that	changes	were	not	necessary	as	the	programs	and	
services	 are	 excellent	 the	 way	 they	 are.	 Only	 a	 small	 portion	 of	 survey	 participants	 made	
recommendations.

More Related Content

What's hot (8)

Little Robert Resume 6 11-21-14
Little Robert Resume 6 11-21-14Little Robert Resume 6 11-21-14
Little Robert Resume 6 11-21-14
 
Faith Chambers Resume - Director of Health Services - Managed Care Specialis...
Faith Chambers Resume  - Director of Health Services - Managed Care Specialis...Faith Chambers Resume  - Director of Health Services - Managed Care Specialis...
Faith Chambers Resume - Director of Health Services - Managed Care Specialis...
 
resume FPS Sexu 1 (1)
resume FPS Sexu 1 (1)resume FPS Sexu 1 (1)
resume FPS Sexu 1 (1)
 
Veralrud Raeane-Resume
Veralrud Raeane-ResumeVeralrud Raeane-Resume
Veralrud Raeane-Resume
 
Tanya Resume 2015 Office
Tanya Resume 2015 OfficeTanya Resume 2015 Office
Tanya Resume 2015 Office
 
Heather Lauria Resume Januray 2017
Heather Lauria Resume Januray 2017Heather Lauria Resume Januray 2017
Heather Lauria Resume Januray 2017
 
Transitions in M&E of SBC
Transitions in M&E of SBCTransitions in M&E of SBC
Transitions in M&E of SBC
 
ADRFullresume
ADRFullresumeADRFullresume
ADRFullresume
 

Similar to Writing Sample Part 1

PEC Performance Presentation
PEC Performance PresentationPEC Performance Presentation
PEC Performance Presentation
Suzanne Doran
 
MPA RESEARCH BOOK FINAL DRAFT
MPA RESEARCH BOOK FINAL DRAFTMPA RESEARCH BOOK FINAL DRAFT
MPA RESEARCH BOOK FINAL DRAFT
Jillian Everett
 
Learning_Unit_5
Learning_Unit_5Learning_Unit_5
Learning_Unit_5
Jack Ong
 
ABA Program and Services - Cycle 2 Evaluation Report
ABA Program and Services - Cycle 2 Evaluation ReportABA Program and Services - Cycle 2 Evaluation Report
ABA Program and Services - Cycle 2 Evaluation Report
Tangül Alten
 
DCoE_FY2015_PEI_Training_Slide_Deck_Episode_8_Reporting_Program_Evaluation_Fi...
DCoE_FY2015_PEI_Training_Slide_Deck_Episode_8_Reporting_Program_Evaluation_Fi...DCoE_FY2015_PEI_Training_Slide_Deck_Episode_8_Reporting_Program_Evaluation_Fi...
DCoE_FY2015_PEI_Training_Slide_Deck_Episode_8_Reporting_Program_Evaluation_Fi...
Carmina Aguirre
 

Similar to Writing Sample Part 1 (20)

Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program Evaluation
Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program EvaluationOrganizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program Evaluation
Organizational Capacity-Building Series - Session 6: Program Evaluation
 
Evaluation seminar1
Evaluation seminar1Evaluation seminar1
Evaluation seminar1
 
The Money Mentors Programme
The Money Mentors ProgrammeThe Money Mentors Programme
The Money Mentors Programme
 
M & E Fundamentals.
M & E Fundamentals.M & E Fundamentals.
M & E Fundamentals.
 
PEC Performance Presentation
PEC Performance PresentationPEC Performance Presentation
PEC Performance Presentation
 
MPA RESEARCH BOOK FINAL DRAFT
MPA RESEARCH BOOK FINAL DRAFTMPA RESEARCH BOOK FINAL DRAFT
MPA RESEARCH BOOK FINAL DRAFT
 
internship abstract
internship abstract internship abstract
internship abstract
 
SWC-SEED-MTE-PPT-23-11-2016
SWC-SEED-MTE-PPT-23-11-2016SWC-SEED-MTE-PPT-23-11-2016
SWC-SEED-MTE-PPT-23-11-2016
 
Learning_Unit_5
Learning_Unit_5Learning_Unit_5
Learning_Unit_5
 
Evaluation of SME and entreprenuership programme - Jonathan Potter & Stuart T...
Evaluation of SME and entreprenuership programme - Jonathan Potter & Stuart T...Evaluation of SME and entreprenuership programme - Jonathan Potter & Stuart T...
Evaluation of SME and entreprenuership programme - Jonathan Potter & Stuart T...
 
M&E Concepts.pptx
M&E Concepts.pptxM&E Concepts.pptx
M&E Concepts.pptx
 
Basics of Monitoring & Evaluation
Basics of Monitoring & EvaluationBasics of Monitoring & Evaluation
Basics of Monitoring & Evaluation
 
Collecting the PEPFAR OVC MER Essential Survey Indicators: Frequently Asked Q...
Collecting the PEPFAR OVC MER Essential Survey Indicators: Frequently Asked Q...Collecting the PEPFAR OVC MER Essential Survey Indicators: Frequently Asked Q...
Collecting the PEPFAR OVC MER Essential Survey Indicators: Frequently Asked Q...
 
ABA Program and Services - Cycle 2 Evaluation Report
ABA Program and Services - Cycle 2 Evaluation ReportABA Program and Services - Cycle 2 Evaluation Report
ABA Program and Services - Cycle 2 Evaluation Report
 
Measuring Success in Patient Advocacy Initiatives
Measuring Success in Patient Advocacy InitiativesMeasuring Success in Patient Advocacy Initiatives
Measuring Success in Patient Advocacy Initiatives
 
FINAL report 5.19
FINAL report 5.19FINAL report 5.19
FINAL report 5.19
 
Contribution of Multiple Assessment Methodologies in a Theory-driven Evaluati...
Contribution of Multiple Assessment Methodologies in a Theory-driven Evaluati...Contribution of Multiple Assessment Methodologies in a Theory-driven Evaluati...
Contribution of Multiple Assessment Methodologies in a Theory-driven Evaluati...
 
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Eight - Impact Ev...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Eight - Impact Ev...Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Eight - Impact Ev...
Annual Results and Impact Evaluation Workshop for RBF - Day Eight - Impact Ev...
 
ORAL HEALTH PROGRAM – A CASE STUDY FROM US
ORAL HEALTH PROGRAM – A CASE STUDY FROM USORAL HEALTH PROGRAM – A CASE STUDY FROM US
ORAL HEALTH PROGRAM – A CASE STUDY FROM US
 
DCoE_FY2015_PEI_Training_Slide_Deck_Episode_8_Reporting_Program_Evaluation_Fi...
DCoE_FY2015_PEI_Training_Slide_Deck_Episode_8_Reporting_Program_Evaluation_Fi...DCoE_FY2015_PEI_Training_Slide_Deck_Episode_8_Reporting_Program_Evaluation_Fi...
DCoE_FY2015_PEI_Training_Slide_Deck_Episode_8_Reporting_Program_Evaluation_Fi...
 

Writing Sample Part 1