Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you: 1. Determine at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS. Note: At least two (2) of the assets that you determine should be interactive. 2. Determine the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously, asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for each asset that you have identified and how the related delivery modality will work the best for your school district. Provide a rationale for your response. 3. Create an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives that support your learning assets and provide one (1) sample for each chosen learning asset for the curriculum. Note: The samples can be short and simple depending on your course topic. The goal is to test whether the assets work functionally in the LMS. The sample file pages are not included in the required assignment page length. 4. Specify the key stakeholders who are responsible for managing the assets and what criteria they will use to manage. 5. Analyze how each asset enhances the educational goals of your course and examine the way(s) in which the LMS supports those goals.   6. Provide at least five (5) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the paper’s claims. 7.      Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements: a.      Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. b.      Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length. c.      Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length. Points: 160 Assignment 3: Designing Curriculum for Your LMS Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Determine at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS. Note: At least two (2) of the assets that you determine should be interactive. Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely determined at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS. Partially determined at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS. Satisfactorily determined at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS. Thoroughly determined at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS. 2. Determine the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously, a.

1. Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
1. Determine at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g.,
lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be
integrated in the LMS. Note: At least two (2) of the assets that
you determine should be interactive.
2. Determine the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously,
asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for each asset that you have
identified and how the related delivery modality will work the
best for your school district. Provide a rationale for your
response.
3. Create an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives that
support your learning assets and provide one (1) sample for
each chosen learning asset for the curriculum.
Note: The samples can be short and simple depending on your
course topic. The goal is to test whether the assets work
functionally in the LMS. The sample file pages are not included
in the required assignment page length.
4. Specify the key stakeholders who are responsible for
managing the assets and what criteria they will use to manage.
5. Analyze how each asset enhances the educational goals of
your course and examine the way(s) in which the LMS supports
those goals.
6. Provide at least five (5) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed
references (no more than one [1] used previously), published
within the last five (5) years that support the paper’s claims.
7. Format your assignment according to the following
formatting requirements:
a. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size

2. 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
b. Include a cover page containing the title of the
assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the
course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the
required page length.
c. Include a reference page. Citations and references must
follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the
required page length.
Points: 160
Assignment 3: Designing Curriculum for Your LMS
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Determine at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g.,
lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be
integrated in the LMS. Note: At least two (2) of the assets that
you determine should be interactive.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or incompletely determined at least four (4)
different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test /
quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS.
Partially determined at least four (4) different learning assets

3. (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be
integrated in the LMS.
Satisfactorily determined at least four (4) different learning
assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can
be integrated in the LMS.
Thoroughly determined at least four (4) different learning assets
(e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be
integrated in the LMS.
2. Determine the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously,
asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for each asset that you have
identified and how the related delivery modality will work the
best for your organization. Provide a rationale for your
response.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely determined the delivery
modality (i.e., synchronously, asynchronously, or as a hybrid)
for each asset that you have identified and how the related
delivery modality will work the best for your organization. Did
not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your
response.
Partially determined the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously,
asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for each asset that you have
identified and how the related delivery modality will work the
best for your organization. Partially provided a rationale for
your response.
Satisfactorily determined the delivery modality (i.e.,
synchronously, asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for each asset
that you have identified and how the related delivery modality
will work the best for your organization. Satisfactorily provided
a rationale for your response.
Thoroughly determined the delivery modality (i.e.,
synchronously, asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for each asset
that you have identified and how the related delivery modality
will work the best for your organization. Thoroughlyprovided a
rationale for your response.
3. Create an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives that

4. support your learning assets and provide one (1) sample for
each chosen learning asset for the curriculum.
Note: The samples can be short and simple depending on your
course topic. The goal is to test whether the assets work
functionally in the LMS. The sample file pages are not included
in the required assignment page length.
Note: You may use assets that you created from others courses
(e.g., EDU 522, etc.).
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely created an outline of five (5)
curriculum objectives that support your learning assets; did not
submit or incompletely provided one (1) sample for each chosen
learning asset for the curriculum.
Partially created an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives
that support your learning assets; partially provided one (1)
sample for each chosen learning asset for the curriculum.
Satisfactorily created an outline of five (5) curriculum
objectives that support your learning assets;
satisfactorilyprovided one (1) sample for each chosen learning
asset for the curriculum.
Thoroughly created an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives
that support your learning assets; thoroughlyprovided one (1)
sample for each chosen learning asset for the curriculum.
4. Specify the key stakeholders who are responsible for
managing the assets and what criteria they will use to manage.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely specified the key stakeholders
who are responsible for managing the assets and what criteria
they will use to manage.
Partially specified the key stakeholders who are responsible for
managing the assets and what criteria they will use to manage.
Satisfactorily specified the key stakeholders who are
responsible for managing the assets and what criteria they will
use to manage.
Thoroughly specified the key stakeholders who are responsible
for managing the assets and what criteria they will use to

5. manage.
5. Analyze how each asset enhances the educational goals of
your course and examine the way(s) in which the LMS supports
those goals.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how each asset
enhances the educational goals of your course; did not submit or
incompletely examined the way(s) in which the LMS supports
those goals.
Partially analyzed how each asset enhances the educational
goals of your course; partially examined the way(s) in which the
LMS supports those goals.
Satisfactorily analyzed how each asset enhances the educational
goals of your course; satisfactorily examined the way(s) in
which the LMS supports those goals.
Thoroughly analyzed how each asset enhances the educational
goals of your course; thoroughly examined the way(s) in which
the LMS supports those goals.
6. Provide at least three (3) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed
references (no more than one [1] used previously), published
within the last five (5) years that support the paper’s claims.
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all
references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; most references high
quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality
choices.
7. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation,
or formatting.
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or
formatting.
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or

6. formatting.
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation,
or formatting.
8. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference
section
Weight: 5%
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only
partially formatted correctly in APA style.
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are
generally formatted correctly in APA style.
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error
free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
9. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional
or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of
quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of
quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of
quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
10. Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include
reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and
evidence that logically support ideas.
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with
reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent
manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.