My Presentation about Global Governance

1. ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT
World Federation System
JAVID ROSTAMI
SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY

2. ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT
Central government whose authority extends across the entirety of
this planet.
Source: similar to how states imposing their Authorities, In
Globalization Era, a central entity could expand its Authority too.

3. ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT
•There are various Theories about world government. But we faced
with to categories in contrast, and with specific implementers,
elements and characters, as describe below:
Theory Implementer Main character Goal
liberal
internationalism
International
institute, such
as UN
Internationalism Homogenization
World
Federation
Global
Parliament
Globalism Multi-Culturlism

4. FEDERAL WORLD GOVERNMENT (FWG)
FWG is simply an extension of the idea of democratic federation to
the global level
resemble the operation of existing federal governments, with
the exception that no military force would be needed to protect
the global citizenship against external societies

5. FEDERAL WORLD GOVERNMENT (FWG)
Support for FWG is rooted in:

6. FEDERAL WORLD GOVERNMENT (FWG)
A key motivators for seeking FWG are:
wars and the threat of a nuclear holocaust
establishment of more effective mechanisms
to guarantee basic human rights everywhere
to address transnational issues, such as environment,
global warming, transnational terrorism, etc

8. FEDERATION MODEL
Where's definition is a broad one,
and could apply to many different
systems. But in general view, we
faced with 3 elements, include (but
not limited) Federal Government,
states & Citizens.
they are not subordinate one to
another, but co-ordinate with each
other.
MEMBER
STATES
CITIZENS
FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT

9. PRINCIPLES OF WORLD FEDERALISM
While substantial differences
exist between advocates of
world federalism regarding the
best approach to take in
bringing about a world
federation, there is consensus
regarding the principles
underlying the operation of
such a government. These
principles include the following:

10. world federalism liberal internationalism
Enforceable secular global law aimed at
protecting individual human rights
global law would apply to nations & even
states
Direct responsibility and accountability to
the individual people
the UN lies with national governments
Separation of Powers Separation of Powers
Respect for cultural diversity Unification of nations
Hieratical Control Political Control
Funding independent of national
governments with core control system
Funding independent of national
governments
PRINCIPLES OF WORLD FEDERALISM

11. THE CASE FOR FWG
There three principal arguments in favour of establishing a FWG are
that it would:
(1) Eliminate the need for violent means in resolving large-scale
conflicts
(2) Improve the effectiveness of handling global issues.
(3) More respective for cultural diversity.

12. AGAINST UNITED NATIONS
• The UN falls far short of its charter and is in an urgent need of reform.
• While trade and finance treaties are mostly well enforced, agreements on
social, human and ecological issues have very limited effect.
• Poor populations, especially in Africa, do not much benefit from, and
contribute to, the modern world economy.
• There are many overlapping, sometimes conflicting and confusing,
international treaties and jurisdictions.
• International mechanisms for protecting basic human rights, or even
preventing wide-scale atrocities, are weak and inadequate.

13. WITH EU
Usually, the European Union is seen as a successful example ofa regional federal and
supranational force. The preamble to the Maastricht Treaty mentions some important
principles. According to the Treaty the member states declare that:
1.CONFIRMING their attachment to the principles of liberty, democracy and
respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and of the rule of law.
2.DESIRING to deepen the solidarity between their peoples while
respecting their history, their culture and their traditions.
3.RESOLVED to continue the process of creating an ever closer union
among the peoples of Europe, in which decisions are taken as closely as
possible to the citizen in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity.

14. APPROACHES TO EFFECTING A FWG
While sharing a similar objective, FWG activists promote a number of
different, sometimes conflicting, approaches, which may be broadly
grouped into the following categories:
Regional integration
Incremental reform
Integration of democracies first
Direct creation of FWG by the people

15. Summing Up