1) The workplace assessment revealed a very unhealthy work environment with a score of 35 out of 50. Communication was poor and staff felt excluded from decision making.
2) Incivility, such as a disrespectful interaction with a supervisor, has been experienced. Establishing excellent communication and respect between all employees is needed.
3) Implementing strategies from the literature around improving workplace safety, respect, and communication can help create a stronger team and more positive work environment.
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace I.docxashane2
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
Clark (2018)
Clark (2015)
Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Incivility at the workplace is common in nursing education and clinical practice (Clark, Olender, Cardoni, & Kenski, 2011). Workplace incivility can be defined as repeated offensive, disrespectful, or discouraging behavior, misuse of power, or unfair punishments that make the receiver distressed and feel shamed; creating strain; and decreasing the employee’s self-confidence (Warner, Sommers, Zappa, & Thornlow, 2016). Uncivil behaviors can appear in different forms and may cause profound effects on their recipients.
The work environment assessment of my workplace resulted in a score 35. According to Clark (2015), a score below 50 in the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory indicates a very unhealthy work environment. It is surprising that two statements where the organization scored the highest were those that stated individuals and collective achievements are celebrated and publicized ; and that use of effective conflicts resolution skills, (Clark, 2015). The publicity and celebration of individual and collective achievements is a new thing that has just been initiated and we are going strong with it. The staffs are vastly knowledgeable .
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the .docxbartholomeocoombs
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
Clark (2018)
Clark (2015)
Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Work Environment Assessment- this is my discussion
Using the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory (Clark, 2015) my workplace ranks 90, or very healthy. Why it ranks as healthy or civil is that between units of the hospital there is great communication between units, to the extent that is a need on one unit as far as staffing, another unit will offer to help, this is the norm, and not the exception for our hospital. We also feel supported by management during times of crisis, I work in two distinct areas where things can escalate very quickly, .
Discussion Workplace Environment AssessmentHow healthy is y.docxpetehbailey729071
Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment
How healthy is your workplace?
You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes.
There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
· Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.
Post
a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples.
Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
· Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
· Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
o Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
o Clark (2018)
o Clark (2015)
o Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
· Explain what the results of the As.
Discussion PostIncivility in health care settings can have a dwiddowsonerica
Discussion Post
Incivility in health care settings can have a detrimental impact on individuals, teams, and organizations (Clark, 2018). The American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements clearly articulates the nurse's obligation to foster safe, ethical, civil workplaces (Clark, 2015).
Description Work Environment Assessment Results
The Clark healthy workplace inventory results revealed that I work in a very unhealthy work environment. After completing the assessment, my total score was less than 50. A score of less than 50 indicates a very unhealthy work environment. In the patient care environment, an unhealthy work environment can provoke uncertainty and self-doubt, weaken self-confidence, and compromise critical thinking and clinical judgment skills (Clark, Olender, Cardoni, & Kenski, 2011). I was not entirely surprised that the assessment revealed an unhealthy work environment because it is entirely accurate, as evidenced by the results. My workplace is characterized by rude, discourteous, and lack of regard for others, creating low morale among employees, stress, and hostility, and thus incivility. This abnormality has been adopted as the norm, thus forming a culture of bullying, rudeness, and other incivility set by a dictatorial head of the organization, trickling down through the ranks (Bar-David S. 2018). Employees' efforts and input are not being recognized and appreciated.
Incivility experienced in the workplace
I have experienced incivility at my workplace in many forms, patterns, shapes, and sizes. One example of my experience is when one of my patients was incontinent. I work in a mental health care facility, so we seldom have incontinent patients. We were short-staffed as usual, and I was busy passing meds and providing care for other patients in order to catch up. The assigned tech walked up to me to tell me that my patient needs to be changed. At first, I thought she needed help with changing the patient, so I offered to help when I finish passing meds. However, she told me that she does not need help, but she is wants me to go change my patient-delegating with quite an attitude-rolling her eyes. I quietly walked to the manager's office to make a report about how unruly and unprofessional the tech had conducted herself. The manager called her in the office to ask what happened. She narrated the same event. Without reprimanding her, the manager turned to me yelling that tech has not received training on how to change patients and that I should go do it since I went to school, and I have a license. She also reminded me that techs do not have any license to be revoked by the BON as nurses do. I felt very disappointed and frustrated, but I went ahead and changed the patient and continued my day in fear of losing my license if I do not do as ordered. Having the managers reminding the nurses consistently that they could lose their nursing license creates the most sig ...
WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT4Post 1 Melissa Jackson Top o.docxtroutmanboris
WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT 4
Post 1
Melissa Jackson
Top of Form
Work Environment Assessment Results
The results of the Work Environment Assessment show that the workplace I evaluated could use some improvement. This determination is based on a Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory score of 72, which is mildly healthy. I rated 12 questions in the “somewhat true” category and 8 in the “neutral” category. The workplace sits somewhere right in the middle based on the fact that I have had or witnessed, some negative interactions, but overall people are happy and satisfied with their jobs. I don’t believe patient care is impacted negatively, however with more advocacy for civility based on the assessment there is room for improvement. Clark (2019) stated, “disrespectful and uncivil behaviors in healthcare settings can have detrimental effects on individuals, teams, organizations, and patient safety—including life-threatening mistakes, preventable complications, or harm to a patient” (para. 1). We know from studies and assessments, like the Clark Inventory, that the changes made to improve civility in the workplace also improving patient outcomes. I believe my workplace is mostly civil. There are always a few things in any environment or situation that can have a negative impact. Sometimes it’s a person, other times it’s a schedule, policy, or procedure. My workplace makes a good effort to correct any incivility that arises, but more can always be done. Based on the inventory they could improve in areas like promoting employee wellness and self-care, offering mentoring programs, and implementing joint-decision making.
Incivility in the workplace
The American Nurses Association defined incivility as “one or more rude, discourteous, or disrespectful actions that may or may not have a negative intent behind them” (Violence, Incivility, & Bullying, 2017, para. 2). Based on that description I recall a time when an ER physician screamed at me and insulted me in front of my peers and within earshot of patient and their families. It was not something I had done wrong and she later apologized stating she was “just having a bad day.” The charge nurse also pulled her aside and told her if she was going to treat her nurses like that there would be a formal complaint filed against her. It made for a very uncomfortable shift. As much as I tried to forget the incident, the damage was done to our working relationship. I never let it affect patient care, but all respect that I once had for her was gone. I am a firm believer in “praise in public, punish in private.” Had she just pulled me aside and asked about the situation she would have realized her error, instead she lost her cool and chose to berate me in front of peers and patients. Not only did she build a barrier with me, but she also lost the respect of many of my peers, and probably a few patients. All it took was one incidence of her losing her composure to change how everyone working that shif.
Sociology 1010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBvGBdIHs7s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1oOjKQflN0
http://sep.stanford.edu/sep/jon/family/jos/culture/index.html
The point of this assignments is so that you learn and gain insights on how both the Progressives (Liberals) and the Traditionalists (Conservatives) see and reason about public issues. If you end up writing both your initial post and reply from (Progressive and Conservative on say Abortion) you are doing the wrong thing.
The cultural war is being waged by 2 major camps--Traditionalist (Conservatives) and Progressives (Liberals). For this assignment, I will like you to do the following:
Step 1: Pick an ideological standpoint (say, Progressive), and post on 1 of the topics (say abortion) from the Progressive standpoint. (Your title: Progressive on Abortion). Please complete this step before doing anything else.
Step 2: React to a post by a fellow student from the opposing standpoint. (Say the person wrote on: Felon Enfranchisement, Progressive Ideology; You then change your title to say: Felon Enfranchisement: Traditionalist Ideology) In a separate paragraph, examine and explain which camp is winning, or has won, the ideological war. (Note: Your two post must cover both the Progressive and Traditionalist ideological stances on different public issues).
Please, avoid personalizing (I believe that . . ., it is my view that . . .) the discussion. Simply say: "Progressive would argue that . . . or, From the Conservatives standpoint . . . or, According to the Liberals . . . etc.
Here are a list of Public Issues:
Homosexuality and Same-Sex Marriage
Women in Combat Three Strikes and You're Out Policy
Sex Education in Public Schools Stop and Frisk
Race and Ethnic Relations Stem Cell Research
Gender Relations Felon Disenfranchisement
Affirmative Action Anti-smoking laws
Immigration School desegregation
Freedom of Expression
Abortion
Gun Ownership Flying While Arab (profiling)
Patriot Act Conceal/Open and Carry (of handguns)
Affordable Health Act
Public School Prayer
Social Welfare--Social Security
Social Welfare--Unemployment Insurance
Prostitution / Sex Work
Death Penalty
Week 3: Support and Empowerment of Employees
How does healthcare compare with other fields in markers, such as employee empowerment and engagement? Investigating that question is one purpose of your Module 2 Assignment, for which you will interview three employees in different fields, with one individual in healthcare. You will also consider the theme of psychological safety, which you will explore in more detail in Week ...
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace I.docxashane2
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
Clark (2018)
Clark (2015)
Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Incivility at the workplace is common in nursing education and clinical practice (Clark, Olender, Cardoni, & Kenski, 2011). Workplace incivility can be defined as repeated offensive, disrespectful, or discouraging behavior, misuse of power, or unfair punishments that make the receiver distressed and feel shamed; creating strain; and decreasing the employee’s self-confidence (Warner, Sommers, Zappa, & Thornlow, 2016). Uncivil behaviors can appear in different forms and may cause profound effects on their recipients.
The work environment assessment of my workplace resulted in a score 35. According to Clark (2015), a score below 50 in the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory indicates a very unhealthy work environment. It is surprising that two statements where the organization scored the highest were those that stated individuals and collective achievements are celebrated and publicized ; and that use of effective conflicts resolution skills, (Clark, 2015). The publicity and celebration of individual and collective achievements is a new thing that has just been initiated and we are going strong with it. The staffs are vastly knowledgeable .
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the .docxbartholomeocoombs
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
Clark (2018)
Clark (2015)
Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Work Environment Assessment- this is my discussion
Using the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory (Clark, 2015) my workplace ranks 90, or very healthy. Why it ranks as healthy or civil is that between units of the hospital there is great communication between units, to the extent that is a need on one unit as far as staffing, another unit will offer to help, this is the norm, and not the exception for our hospital. We also feel supported by management during times of crisis, I work in two distinct areas where things can escalate very quickly, .
Discussion Workplace Environment AssessmentHow healthy is y.docxpetehbailey729071
Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment
How healthy is your workplace?
You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes.
There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
· Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.
Post
a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples.
Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
· Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
· Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
o Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
o Clark (2018)
o Clark (2015)
o Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
· Explain what the results of the As.
Discussion PostIncivility in health care settings can have a dwiddowsonerica
Discussion Post
Incivility in health care settings can have a detrimental impact on individuals, teams, and organizations (Clark, 2018). The American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements clearly articulates the nurse's obligation to foster safe, ethical, civil workplaces (Clark, 2015).
Description Work Environment Assessment Results
The Clark healthy workplace inventory results revealed that I work in a very unhealthy work environment. After completing the assessment, my total score was less than 50. A score of less than 50 indicates a very unhealthy work environment. In the patient care environment, an unhealthy work environment can provoke uncertainty and self-doubt, weaken self-confidence, and compromise critical thinking and clinical judgment skills (Clark, Olender, Cardoni, & Kenski, 2011). I was not entirely surprised that the assessment revealed an unhealthy work environment because it is entirely accurate, as evidenced by the results. My workplace is characterized by rude, discourteous, and lack of regard for others, creating low morale among employees, stress, and hostility, and thus incivility. This abnormality has been adopted as the norm, thus forming a culture of bullying, rudeness, and other incivility set by a dictatorial head of the organization, trickling down through the ranks (Bar-David S. 2018). Employees' efforts and input are not being recognized and appreciated.
Incivility experienced in the workplace
I have experienced incivility at my workplace in many forms, patterns, shapes, and sizes. One example of my experience is when one of my patients was incontinent. I work in a mental health care facility, so we seldom have incontinent patients. We were short-staffed as usual, and I was busy passing meds and providing care for other patients in order to catch up. The assigned tech walked up to me to tell me that my patient needs to be changed. At first, I thought she needed help with changing the patient, so I offered to help when I finish passing meds. However, she told me that she does not need help, but she is wants me to go change my patient-delegating with quite an attitude-rolling her eyes. I quietly walked to the manager's office to make a report about how unruly and unprofessional the tech had conducted herself. The manager called her in the office to ask what happened. She narrated the same event. Without reprimanding her, the manager turned to me yelling that tech has not received training on how to change patients and that I should go do it since I went to school, and I have a license. She also reminded me that techs do not have any license to be revoked by the BON as nurses do. I felt very disappointed and frustrated, but I went ahead and changed the patient and continued my day in fear of losing my license if I do not do as ordered. Having the managers reminding the nurses consistently that they could lose their nursing license creates the most sig ...
WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT4Post 1 Melissa Jackson Top o.docxtroutmanboris
WORK ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT 4
Post 1
Melissa Jackson
Top of Form
Work Environment Assessment Results
The results of the Work Environment Assessment show that the workplace I evaluated could use some improvement. This determination is based on a Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory score of 72, which is mildly healthy. I rated 12 questions in the “somewhat true” category and 8 in the “neutral” category. The workplace sits somewhere right in the middle based on the fact that I have had or witnessed, some negative interactions, but overall people are happy and satisfied with their jobs. I don’t believe patient care is impacted negatively, however with more advocacy for civility based on the assessment there is room for improvement. Clark (2019) stated, “disrespectful and uncivil behaviors in healthcare settings can have detrimental effects on individuals, teams, organizations, and patient safety—including life-threatening mistakes, preventable complications, or harm to a patient” (para. 1). We know from studies and assessments, like the Clark Inventory, that the changes made to improve civility in the workplace also improving patient outcomes. I believe my workplace is mostly civil. There are always a few things in any environment or situation that can have a negative impact. Sometimes it’s a person, other times it’s a schedule, policy, or procedure. My workplace makes a good effort to correct any incivility that arises, but more can always be done. Based on the inventory they could improve in areas like promoting employee wellness and self-care, offering mentoring programs, and implementing joint-decision making.
Incivility in the workplace
The American Nurses Association defined incivility as “one or more rude, discourteous, or disrespectful actions that may or may not have a negative intent behind them” (Violence, Incivility, & Bullying, 2017, para. 2). Based on that description I recall a time when an ER physician screamed at me and insulted me in front of my peers and within earshot of patient and their families. It was not something I had done wrong and she later apologized stating she was “just having a bad day.” The charge nurse also pulled her aside and told her if she was going to treat her nurses like that there would be a formal complaint filed against her. It made for a very uncomfortable shift. As much as I tried to forget the incident, the damage was done to our working relationship. I never let it affect patient care, but all respect that I once had for her was gone. I am a firm believer in “praise in public, punish in private.” Had she just pulled me aside and asked about the situation she would have realized her error, instead she lost her cool and chose to berate me in front of peers and patients. Not only did she build a barrier with me, but she also lost the respect of many of my peers, and probably a few patients. All it took was one incidence of her losing her composure to change how everyone working that shif.
Sociology 1010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBvGBdIHs7s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1oOjKQflN0
http://sep.stanford.edu/sep/jon/family/jos/culture/index.html
The point of this assignments is so that you learn and gain insights on how both the Progressives (Liberals) and the Traditionalists (Conservatives) see and reason about public issues. If you end up writing both your initial post and reply from (Progressive and Conservative on say Abortion) you are doing the wrong thing.
The cultural war is being waged by 2 major camps--Traditionalist (Conservatives) and Progressives (Liberals). For this assignment, I will like you to do the following:
Step 1: Pick an ideological standpoint (say, Progressive), and post on 1 of the topics (say abortion) from the Progressive standpoint. (Your title: Progressive on Abortion). Please complete this step before doing anything else.
Step 2: React to a post by a fellow student from the opposing standpoint. (Say the person wrote on: Felon Enfranchisement, Progressive Ideology; You then change your title to say: Felon Enfranchisement: Traditionalist Ideology) In a separate paragraph, examine and explain which camp is winning, or has won, the ideological war. (Note: Your two post must cover both the Progressive and Traditionalist ideological stances on different public issues).
Please, avoid personalizing (I believe that . . ., it is my view that . . .) the discussion. Simply say: "Progressive would argue that . . . or, From the Conservatives standpoint . . . or, According to the Liberals . . . etc.
Here are a list of Public Issues:
Homosexuality and Same-Sex Marriage
Women in Combat Three Strikes and You're Out Policy
Sex Education in Public Schools Stop and Frisk
Race and Ethnic Relations Stem Cell Research
Gender Relations Felon Disenfranchisement
Affirmative Action Anti-smoking laws
Immigration School desegregation
Freedom of Expression
Abortion
Gun Ownership Flying While Arab (profiling)
Patriot Act Conceal/Open and Carry (of handguns)
Affordable Health Act
Public School Prayer
Social Welfare--Social Security
Social Welfare--Unemployment Insurance
Prostitution / Sex Work
Death Penalty
Week 3: Support and Empowerment of Employees
How does healthcare compare with other fields in markers, such as employee empowerment and engagement? Investigating that question is one purpose of your Module 2 Assignment, for which you will interview three employees in different fields, with one individual in healthcare. You will also consider the theme of psychological safety, which you will explore in more detail in Week ...
I need 120 words for each question. Please ensure to post individual.docxeugeniadean34240
I need 120 words for each question. Please ensure to post individual reference with each question
Unit 1
Q 1;
Identify two organizational structures used in health care. What are the central characteristics of each? To what extent is bureaucracy necessary in health care organizations? Explain.
Q 2;
How does a doctorally prepared nurse work across and between levels of an organization? What are the challenges and/or rewards to be gained? Does one outweigh the other?
Resources
Delmatoff, J., & Lazarus, I. R. (2014). The most effective leadership style for the new landscape of healthcare.
Journal of Healthcare Management, 59
(4), 245-249. URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=97206195&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Arbab Kash, B., Spaulding, A., Johnson, C. E., & Gamm, L. (2014). Success factors for strategic change initiatives: A qualitative study of healthcare administrators' perspectives.
Journal of Healthcare Management, 59
(1), 65-81. URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=94059299&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Kritsonis, A. (2004/2005). Comparison of change theories.
International Journal of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity, 8
(1) 1-7. URL:
http://qiroadmap.org/?wpfb_dl=12
Suter, E., Goldman, J., Martimianakis, T., Chatalalsingh, C., Dematteo, D. J., & Reeves, S. (2013). The use of systems and organizational theories in the interprofessional field: Findings from a scoping review.
Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27
(1), 57-64. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.739670 URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=84423842&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Narayana, E. A. (1992). Bureaucratization of non-governmental organizations: An analysis of employees' perceptions and attitudes.
Public Administration and Development, 12
(2), 123-137. URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/194674953?accountid=7374
Klemsdal, L. (2013). From bureaucracy to learning organization: Critical minimum specification design as space for sensemaking.
Systemic Practice & Action Research
,
26
(1), 39-52. doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9267-3 URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=84739308&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Unit 2
Q 1:
What are three payment structures used in the health care industry across the care continuum? How are they similar? How are they different? Is there a single problem that transverses all three of the identified payment structures? Explain.
Q 2:
Identify a significant problem with one of the three payment structures used in the health care industry across the care continuum (from DQ 1) and propose a solution from one of the other two payment structures.
Resources
.
A Quantitative Explanatory Correlational Study to examine the relationship between role ambiguity, self efficacy and interdisciplinary collaboration in hopes to improve working relationships which will then result in improved service delivery.
1 Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV Upon completion.docxoswald1horne84988
1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
4. Relate the concepts of work design, motivation, and information flow.
Reading Assignment
Chapter 5:
Leading with Strategic Intelligence and Profound Knowledge, pp. 61-76
Unit Lesson
Healthcare delivery is very procedure-driven and has a high degree of human touch. Unlike some industries
where a product is produced, in health care we are providing care for people who are often in their greatest
time of need. To create an organization where compassionate care is provided by a motivated team, we must
foster a collaborative environment, and we must have great support systems. In this unit, we will focus on
motivation, workflow design, and information flow.
Motivation
Any department or facility can have great systems, but what happens if the team lacks motivation? It is often
said that people leave bad bosses, not bad jobs. With that in mind, let’s explore practical ways you can create
a highly motivated team:
Believe in others: There is a term called the looking glass self, coined by early sociologist Charles Cooley
(1902), who put forth that people will often behave as they perceive others perceive them. In other words, we
tend to perform to the level we think others think we are capable. To put it differently, people often “play their
part.” When you think back to great leaders or coaches in your life, are they not the people who believed in
you the most and saw your greatest potential? People often put a lot of stock into what they perceive their
manager thinks of them, so believing in others is absolutely critical to bringing out the best in your employees.
Understand that input = output: People in management positions cannot have favorites, giving that positive
energy to some and only casually noticing others. Imagine seeing two staff members in the hallway, asking
the one warmly how she is doing and providing praise from about her, then briefly saying to the other, “Oh hi.”
The employee given the cold reception was given a low energy input, and that is likely the same type of low
energy output she will show in her work (i.e., she is more likely to have low productivity and morale). The
energy managers input into their staff is usually the type of energy and output they will bring about.
Understand hygiene (extrinsic) versus higher level (intrinsic) motivators: Some base-level factors such
as pay or unsafe working conditions can prevent an employee from feeling a sense of satisfaction, while
higher level factors such as recognition, achievement and advancement lead to higher motivation. In other
words, when base level and extrinsic factors that affect motivation are present (good pay, safe work
environment), higher levels of motivation (intrinsic) are more likely to come about (productivity, engagement,
etc.). Base-level motivators are often called hygiene factors, a concept coined by Maslow (194.
Discussion 2 Managing Conflict in the WorkplaceHigh-pressure en.docxowenhall46084
Discussion 2: Managing Conflict in the Workplace
High-pressure environments, life-or-death implications, constant change, and long days of exhausting work … It is not surprising that conflicts arise in health care settings. In the fast-paced environment in which nurses work, small differences in decision making, processes, work ethic, and personal characteristics can quickly escalate
As a nurse manager, you need to develop and model skills that effectively address conflict situations. Stephen Covey, author of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, offers sound advice that can be applied to conflict management and resolution. In Habit 4, Think Win-Win, Covey (2004) explains, “[m]any people think in terms of either/or: either you’re nice or you’re tough. Win-win requires that you be both. It is a balancing act between courage and consideration.” Ultimately, how you manage conflict in your setting will determine whether you foster an environment that breeds contempt or one that fosters growth.
Conflict abounds in any workplace; it is a normal part of organizational life. Instead of avoiding or ignoring conflict, the role of the nurse manager is to coach employees through conflict situations and to exercise judgment on how and when to intervene. When managed effectively and focused on substantive issues, conflict can actually lead to better outcomes. However, when interpersonal conflicts go unaddressed, employee morale and engagement–two factors that can seriously impact quality of patient care—will dwindle.
When nurse managers observe employees engaging in toxic or inappropriate workplace behaviors, they must prepare to give difficult feedback. Delivering difficult feedback can be challenging for nurse managers, as they must address employees in a way that is authoritative, supportive, and resolute. One strategy nurse managers can use to deliver difficult feedback is to employ the scripting framework. In this week’s Discussion, you gain experience with using the scripting framework to resolve a conflict situation that you have observed in your past or present workplace.
To prepare
Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on the various forms of conflict that can occur in the workplace.
Consider the types of conflict, including bullying, horizontal violence, toxic and disruptive employees, misuse of social media, unbalanced power, harassment, and favoritism, that exist in your current organization or past place of employment.
Select one type of conflict you have observed. How has conflict impacted your work environment? How have nurse mangers attempted to address conflict situations?
Examine the six-step scripting framework for delivering difficult feedback in Chapter 7 of the course text, From Management to Leadership: Strategies for Transforming Health Care. Then, use this framework to script a conversation between you and the employee(s) involved in the conflict situation you selected.
When drafting your script, reflect on how H.
ALI Response 1The work environment assessment showed by .docxSHIVA101531
ALI
Response 1
The work environment assessment showed by place of employment score of 66, mildly healthy. I would agree with this. I want to point out, the low scores on the questions were referring to management only. Based on these results, the workplace is not entirely civil. The floor staff works excellent together, but we avoid the director at all costs, as far as bringing things up or going to seek them out. It is felt firmly among floor staff that all the director of our unit makes us feel like we are not doing enough, and she cannot stand to be on the unit. This is mainly because we “just aren't doing things right.” Often, she has come down and just cleaned up things, asking what we have been doing and why we cannot keep up. We feel belittled and not 100% when she is around. “The toxic environment leads to a decrease in the nurse’s job satisfaction resulting in increased absenteeism and unnecessary turnover. (Schoville & Aebersold, 2020, p. 2).
There have been incivility incidents in the workplace, and people were unsure of what to do at that moment, making it uncomfortable for all. It seems many of the times those incidents get swept under the rug. I can think of the director with a raised voice at one of the providers in the nurse’s station in front of all floor staff. This was highly inappropriate, and the provider was very hurt. Not being handeled properly, it made everyone uncomfortable. The provider was going to write an incident report, but in the end, did not. Like many other times, when the director makes people cry, it is ignored because there is no one else to tell. If we do seek out a higher up, we feel there will be retaliation anyway.
The DESC model is an excellent approach to structuring a civil conversation. DESC stands to Describe your specific situation, express your concerns, state other alternatives and consequence statement. “Using DESC model in conjunction with cognitive rehearsal is an effective way to address specific incivility incidents." (Clark, 2018, p. 21).
One way to keep the workplace civil is to have high levels of emotional intelligence. In doing this, staff will be happier and conflict management will be easier. Keeping personal thoughts and feeling to the side will help the leader focus on the actual problem and the solving. “First, as a leader, it is important to bracket your own emotional responses.” (Marshall & Broome, 2018, p. 286).
“Interactions among employees can affect their ability to do their jobs, their loyalty to the organization, and most important, the delivery of safe, high-quality patient care.” (Clark, 2018, p. 18).
References
Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based
scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000563
Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert
clinician to influential leader (2nd ed). New York, NY: Springer..
Discussion Healthy Relationships in the WorkplaceHealthy relati.docxlefrancoishazlett
Discussion: Healthy Relationships in the Workplace
Healthy relationships form the basis for a positive workplace. When staff are engaged in their jobs, supported by one another, and feel a sense of security in their work, healthy relationships among staff members will flourish. Nurse managers can assess the workplace for healthy relationships by observing the interactions among staff members. Are trust, respect, and collegiality evident, or might some staff members display toxic or dysfunctional behaviors toward one another? When toxic or dysfunctional behaviors are evident even among the smallest cohort of staff, nurse managers must take steps to foster positive interactions. In fact, all other efforts to establish a positive workplace will likely fall short if they are not built on the foundation of healthy interpersonal relationships.
In this Discussion, you examine the interactions between employees at your current organization or one with which you are familiar. You also explore positive psychology, a theory of well-being that has helped many workplaces to increase positivity and foster healthy relationships among staff members.
To prepare
Review Chapter 2, “Cultivating the Leadership Relationship” in the course text, From Management to Leadership: Strategies for Transforming Health Care. Examine how leaders cultivate healthy relationships among all staff members.
Review the article, “Using Positive Psychology to Engage Your Staff during Difficult Times.” How can positive psychology foster healthy workplace relationships and increase staff engagement?
Reflect on the interactions you see in your own organization or in one with which you are familiar. What relationships do you observe across different job categories, such as RNs, LPNs, techs, and nursing assistants? Do relationship disparities exist between shifts, departments, or members of different disciplines, such as nursing staff and physicians?
Identify environments where unhealthy relationships most commonly occur. What leadership strategies might you use to build healthy relationships among these specific staff members? Furthermore, how could you apply positive psychology to increase positivity in this environment?
Post an explanation of at least two leadership strategies you could implement to build healthy relationships among staff members in the workplace you selected. Cite specific examples in your explanation by identifying the staff members you would target and explaining how your strategies would foster healthy interactions among these staff members. In addition, suggest at least one positive psychology strategy you could employ to increase the ratio of positive to negative interactions in your workplace; explain your rationale.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days using one or more of the following approaches:
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Share a st.
SOCW 6530 wk 8 peer responses Respond to the blog posts of tChereCheek752
SOCW 6530 wk 8 peer responses
Respond to the blog posts of three colleagues in one or more of the following ways:
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Validate an idea in your colleague’s post with your own experience.
MUST RESPOND TO EACH ONE SEPARATELY CITE EVERYTHING AND FULL REFERENCES
PEER 1: David Jones
An Explanation of Potential Challenges for Evaluation During Your Field Education Experience
Evaluation occurs in different ways during the field education experience. I receive evaluation from my field instructor on my performance at the therapy office. I also evaluate the clients that I have interactions with while interning. Both of which can pose separate types of challenges. Receiving constructive criticism can be difficult for some. A potential challenge with receiving the evaluation and criticism from my field instructor would be my inability to do so in a short period and apply it. However, it is imperative to use this feedback to critique and affirm my own practice (Garthwait, 2017, p.36). A potential challenge that I face in my evaluation of the clients is that it may be difficult to measure outcomes in such a short amount of time. We only have 11 weeks in each semester to get involved in our client interventions and many of the circumstances require much longer than that.
An Explanation of Personal Action Plans You Might Take to Address Evaluation in Your Field Education Experience
I believe an action plan for the potential challenges faced with the evaluation from the instructor is to take notes on the information being shared and allow processing time. I write notes with questions to ensure I understand what is being said, and ask any questions I may have about improving my practice. As far as an action plan for the potential challenge of evaluating the clients, I can conduct a pre/post survey of the clients I was able to work with to see what they have learned and utilized from the class currently and again at the final weeks. I can also follow up with my field instructor after I stop interning, to see how influential I have been on them.
reference
Garthwait, C. L. (2017). The social work practicum: A guide and workbook for students (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
PEER 2
Candise Mitchell
Sometimes complex social problems require complex interventions, and sometimes they respond well to simple interventions (Thyer, 2013). This simplicity also applies to social worker procedures and protocol. Being a social worker is not an easy task. It is easy to think that it consists of just talking to others, but the interventions, research, and paperwork can be more challenging than a defiant client. Within my internship I have learned a great deal regarding client care and interactions for with adults and couples regarding trauma, domestic violence, couples counseling, anger management, and self-care just to name a few. However, the challenges within my placement largely consisted o ...
G180 Module 01 Assignment 1. Your friend is playing battleship wit.docxhanneloremccaffery
G180 Module 01 Assignment
1. Your friend is playing battleship with you. In each round you either hit or miss. List the sample space if you only play four rounds. Use H for hit and M for miss. (Hint: There will be 16 outcomes)
2. Abigail is going to a new restaurant for her birthday. She wants to choose one appetizer, one entrée, and either a side dish or a dessert. If the restaurant offers 5 appetizers, 10 entrees, 4 side dishes and 3 desserts. How many different combinations can Abigail make?
3. You are trying to form a committee of six people at work to run a group project (not including yourself). If you have fifteen coworkers to choose from, how many different committees can you form?
4. You are volunteering at your child’s school by judging the science fair. You need to assign first, second, and third place ribbons. If there are 17 students who participated, how many ways can you assign the ribbons?
Instructions: Reply to the threads of at least 2 classmates.
Each reply must be at least 450 words.
Each reply must also include a biblical integration and at least 2 peer-reviewed source citations in current APA format in addition to the text.
Trend 1
We read in Luke 14:28, "For which of you, desiring to build a tower, does not first sit down and count the cost, whether he has enough to complete it?" This speaks directly to the matter that we are not to enter into decisions lightly. We must ensure that we have the tools and resources needed to bring a plan to completion and ensure we do so in the most efficient manner possible. The same concept would apply when conducting a job analysis for an organization
The purpose of a job analysis is to ensure the the expected outcomes of a role are being achieved in the most efficient and effective ways possible (Pynes and Lombardi, 2011). Sometimes that includes evaluating a work flow, a series of processes, a specific role, or a combination of all of the above. It is of the utmost importance for an organization in any space to ensure that are constantly evaluating the productivity and work flows to ensure that are obtaining maximum results. In this week's reading we learn of several different tools that can be utilized when conducting a job analysis.
During my time as a nurse manager in the hospital setting, I actually had to enlist the assistance of our Human Resources to evaluate our work flow as we were undergoing a reorganization of two of my departments. Due to a drastic decrease in the number of deliveries we were having in our labor department, we were faced with the charge to combine our Post-Partum unit with our Women's Health unit. This led to a considerable challenge when taking into account the fact that there were newborns on the post-partum unit. This raised considerable concerns regarding cross-contamination between women's health patients (who may have been considerably ill) and post-partum patients and newborns. We have to take a complete inventory of the sk ...
Collaboration and Teamwork in Health Care Scoring GuideCRI.docxclarebernice
Collaboration and Teamwork in Health Care Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Explain the
concept of
collaboration in
health care.
Does not explain
the concept of
collaboration in
health care.
Explains the
concept of
collaboration but
not in the context
of health care, or
the explanation is
missing key
elements.
Explains the
concept of
collaboration in
health care.
Explains the
concept of
collaboration in
health care and
describes the
unique aspects of
collaboration in
health care.
Describe the
benefits of
effective
collaboration
and teamwork in
health care for
patients,
organizations,
and team
members.
Does not describe
the benefits of
effective
collaboration and
teamwork in
health care for
patients,
organizations,
and team
members.
Describes the
benefits of
effective
collaboration and
teamwork in
health care for
patients,
organizations, or
team members (or
two of these) but
not all three.
Describes the
benefits of
effective
collaboration and
teamwork in
health care for
patients,
organizations,
and team
members.
Describes the
benefits of effective
collaboration and
teamwork in health
care for patients,
organizations, and
team members and
considers the
consequences of
ineffective
collaboration and
teamwork.
Describe the
characteristics
and concepts
required for
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Does not describe
the characteristics
and concepts
required for
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Lists the
characteristics
and concepts
required for
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Describes the
characteristics
and concepts
required for
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Describes the
characteristics and
concepts required
for effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration and
explains how each
contributes to more
effective
collaboration.
Describe barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Does not describe
barriers to
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Identifies barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Describes
barriers to
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Describes barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration and
considers possible
causes for the
barriers.
Identify
evidence-based
strategies to
overcome
barriers to
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Does not identify
evidence-based
strategies to
overcome barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Identifies
strategies to
overcome barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration but
does not provide
Identifies
evidence-based
strategies to
overcome
barriers to
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Identifies evidence-
based strategies to
overcome barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration and
suggests methods
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHE ...
I need 120 words for each question. Please ensure to post individual.docxeugeniadean34240
I need 120 words for each question. Please ensure to post individual reference with each question
Unit 1
Q 1;
Identify two organizational structures used in health care. What are the central characteristics of each? To what extent is bureaucracy necessary in health care organizations? Explain.
Q 2;
How does a doctorally prepared nurse work across and between levels of an organization? What are the challenges and/or rewards to be gained? Does one outweigh the other?
Resources
Delmatoff, J., & Lazarus, I. R. (2014). The most effective leadership style for the new landscape of healthcare.
Journal of Healthcare Management, 59
(4), 245-249. URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=97206195&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Arbab Kash, B., Spaulding, A., Johnson, C. E., & Gamm, L. (2014). Success factors for strategic change initiatives: A qualitative study of healthcare administrators' perspectives.
Journal of Healthcare Management, 59
(1), 65-81. URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=94059299&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Kritsonis, A. (2004/2005). Comparison of change theories.
International Journal of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity, 8
(1) 1-7. URL:
http://qiroadmap.org/?wpfb_dl=12
Suter, E., Goldman, J., Martimianakis, T., Chatalalsingh, C., Dematteo, D. J., & Reeves, S. (2013). The use of systems and organizational theories in the interprofessional field: Findings from a scoping review.
Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27
(1), 57-64. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.739670 URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=84423842&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Narayana, E. A. (1992). Bureaucratization of non-governmental organizations: An analysis of employees' perceptions and attitudes.
Public Administration and Development, 12
(2), 123-137. URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/194674953?accountid=7374
Klemsdal, L. (2013). From bureaucracy to learning organization: Critical minimum specification design as space for sensemaking.
Systemic Practice & Action Research
,
26
(1), 39-52. doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9267-3 URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=84739308&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Unit 2
Q 1:
What are three payment structures used in the health care industry across the care continuum? How are they similar? How are they different? Is there a single problem that transverses all three of the identified payment structures? Explain.
Q 2:
Identify a significant problem with one of the three payment structures used in the health care industry across the care continuum (from DQ 1) and propose a solution from one of the other two payment structures.
Resources
.
A Quantitative Explanatory Correlational Study to examine the relationship between role ambiguity, self efficacy and interdisciplinary collaboration in hopes to improve working relationships which will then result in improved service delivery.
1 Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV Upon completion.docxoswald1horne84988
1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
4. Relate the concepts of work design, motivation, and information flow.
Reading Assignment
Chapter 5:
Leading with Strategic Intelligence and Profound Knowledge, pp. 61-76
Unit Lesson
Healthcare delivery is very procedure-driven and has a high degree of human touch. Unlike some industries
where a product is produced, in health care we are providing care for people who are often in their greatest
time of need. To create an organization where compassionate care is provided by a motivated team, we must
foster a collaborative environment, and we must have great support systems. In this unit, we will focus on
motivation, workflow design, and information flow.
Motivation
Any department or facility can have great systems, but what happens if the team lacks motivation? It is often
said that people leave bad bosses, not bad jobs. With that in mind, let’s explore practical ways you can create
a highly motivated team:
Believe in others: There is a term called the looking glass self, coined by early sociologist Charles Cooley
(1902), who put forth that people will often behave as they perceive others perceive them. In other words, we
tend to perform to the level we think others think we are capable. To put it differently, people often “play their
part.” When you think back to great leaders or coaches in your life, are they not the people who believed in
you the most and saw your greatest potential? People often put a lot of stock into what they perceive their
manager thinks of them, so believing in others is absolutely critical to bringing out the best in your employees.
Understand that input = output: People in management positions cannot have favorites, giving that positive
energy to some and only casually noticing others. Imagine seeing two staff members in the hallway, asking
the one warmly how she is doing and providing praise from about her, then briefly saying to the other, “Oh hi.”
The employee given the cold reception was given a low energy input, and that is likely the same type of low
energy output she will show in her work (i.e., she is more likely to have low productivity and morale). The
energy managers input into their staff is usually the type of energy and output they will bring about.
Understand hygiene (extrinsic) versus higher level (intrinsic) motivators: Some base-level factors such
as pay or unsafe working conditions can prevent an employee from feeling a sense of satisfaction, while
higher level factors such as recognition, achievement and advancement lead to higher motivation. In other
words, when base level and extrinsic factors that affect motivation are present (good pay, safe work
environment), higher levels of motivation (intrinsic) are more likely to come about (productivity, engagement,
etc.). Base-level motivators are often called hygiene factors, a concept coined by Maslow (194.
Discussion 2 Managing Conflict in the WorkplaceHigh-pressure en.docxowenhall46084
Discussion 2: Managing Conflict in the Workplace
High-pressure environments, life-or-death implications, constant change, and long days of exhausting work … It is not surprising that conflicts arise in health care settings. In the fast-paced environment in which nurses work, small differences in decision making, processes, work ethic, and personal characteristics can quickly escalate
As a nurse manager, you need to develop and model skills that effectively address conflict situations. Stephen Covey, author of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, offers sound advice that can be applied to conflict management and resolution. In Habit 4, Think Win-Win, Covey (2004) explains, “[m]any people think in terms of either/or: either you’re nice or you’re tough. Win-win requires that you be both. It is a balancing act between courage and consideration.” Ultimately, how you manage conflict in your setting will determine whether you foster an environment that breeds contempt or one that fosters growth.
Conflict abounds in any workplace; it is a normal part of organizational life. Instead of avoiding or ignoring conflict, the role of the nurse manager is to coach employees through conflict situations and to exercise judgment on how and when to intervene. When managed effectively and focused on substantive issues, conflict can actually lead to better outcomes. However, when interpersonal conflicts go unaddressed, employee morale and engagement–two factors that can seriously impact quality of patient care—will dwindle.
When nurse managers observe employees engaging in toxic or inappropriate workplace behaviors, they must prepare to give difficult feedback. Delivering difficult feedback can be challenging for nurse managers, as they must address employees in a way that is authoritative, supportive, and resolute. One strategy nurse managers can use to deliver difficult feedback is to employ the scripting framework. In this week’s Discussion, you gain experience with using the scripting framework to resolve a conflict situation that you have observed in your past or present workplace.
To prepare
Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on the various forms of conflict that can occur in the workplace.
Consider the types of conflict, including bullying, horizontal violence, toxic and disruptive employees, misuse of social media, unbalanced power, harassment, and favoritism, that exist in your current organization or past place of employment.
Select one type of conflict you have observed. How has conflict impacted your work environment? How have nurse mangers attempted to address conflict situations?
Examine the six-step scripting framework for delivering difficult feedback in Chapter 7 of the course text, From Management to Leadership: Strategies for Transforming Health Care. Then, use this framework to script a conversation between you and the employee(s) involved in the conflict situation you selected.
When drafting your script, reflect on how H.
ALI Response 1The work environment assessment showed by .docxSHIVA101531
ALI
Response 1
The work environment assessment showed by place of employment score of 66, mildly healthy. I would agree with this. I want to point out, the low scores on the questions were referring to management only. Based on these results, the workplace is not entirely civil. The floor staff works excellent together, but we avoid the director at all costs, as far as bringing things up or going to seek them out. It is felt firmly among floor staff that all the director of our unit makes us feel like we are not doing enough, and she cannot stand to be on the unit. This is mainly because we “just aren't doing things right.” Often, she has come down and just cleaned up things, asking what we have been doing and why we cannot keep up. We feel belittled and not 100% when she is around. “The toxic environment leads to a decrease in the nurse’s job satisfaction resulting in increased absenteeism and unnecessary turnover. (Schoville & Aebersold, 2020, p. 2).
There have been incivility incidents in the workplace, and people were unsure of what to do at that moment, making it uncomfortable for all. It seems many of the times those incidents get swept under the rug. I can think of the director with a raised voice at one of the providers in the nurse’s station in front of all floor staff. This was highly inappropriate, and the provider was very hurt. Not being handeled properly, it made everyone uncomfortable. The provider was going to write an incident report, but in the end, did not. Like many other times, when the director makes people cry, it is ignored because there is no one else to tell. If we do seek out a higher up, we feel there will be retaliation anyway.
The DESC model is an excellent approach to structuring a civil conversation. DESC stands to Describe your specific situation, express your concerns, state other alternatives and consequence statement. “Using DESC model in conjunction with cognitive rehearsal is an effective way to address specific incivility incidents." (Clark, 2018, p. 21).
One way to keep the workplace civil is to have high levels of emotional intelligence. In doing this, staff will be happier and conflict management will be easier. Keeping personal thoughts and feeling to the side will help the leader focus on the actual problem and the solving. “First, as a leader, it is important to bracket your own emotional responses.” (Marshall & Broome, 2018, p. 286).
“Interactions among employees can affect their ability to do their jobs, their loyalty to the organization, and most important, the delivery of safe, high-quality patient care.” (Clark, 2018, p. 18).
References
Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based
scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000563
Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert
clinician to influential leader (2nd ed). New York, NY: Springer..
Discussion Healthy Relationships in the WorkplaceHealthy relati.docxlefrancoishazlett
Discussion: Healthy Relationships in the Workplace
Healthy relationships form the basis for a positive workplace. When staff are engaged in their jobs, supported by one another, and feel a sense of security in their work, healthy relationships among staff members will flourish. Nurse managers can assess the workplace for healthy relationships by observing the interactions among staff members. Are trust, respect, and collegiality evident, or might some staff members display toxic or dysfunctional behaviors toward one another? When toxic or dysfunctional behaviors are evident even among the smallest cohort of staff, nurse managers must take steps to foster positive interactions. In fact, all other efforts to establish a positive workplace will likely fall short if they are not built on the foundation of healthy interpersonal relationships.
In this Discussion, you examine the interactions between employees at your current organization or one with which you are familiar. You also explore positive psychology, a theory of well-being that has helped many workplaces to increase positivity and foster healthy relationships among staff members.
To prepare
Review Chapter 2, “Cultivating the Leadership Relationship” in the course text, From Management to Leadership: Strategies for Transforming Health Care. Examine how leaders cultivate healthy relationships among all staff members.
Review the article, “Using Positive Psychology to Engage Your Staff during Difficult Times.” How can positive psychology foster healthy workplace relationships and increase staff engagement?
Reflect on the interactions you see in your own organization or in one with which you are familiar. What relationships do you observe across different job categories, such as RNs, LPNs, techs, and nursing assistants? Do relationship disparities exist between shifts, departments, or members of different disciplines, such as nursing staff and physicians?
Identify environments where unhealthy relationships most commonly occur. What leadership strategies might you use to build healthy relationships among these specific staff members? Furthermore, how could you apply positive psychology to increase positivity in this environment?
Post an explanation of at least two leadership strategies you could implement to build healthy relationships among staff members in the workplace you selected. Cite specific examples in your explanation by identifying the staff members you would target and explaining how your strategies would foster healthy interactions among these staff members. In addition, suggest at least one positive psychology strategy you could employ to increase the ratio of positive to negative interactions in your workplace; explain your rationale.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days using one or more of the following approaches:
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Share a st.
SOCW 6530 wk 8 peer responses Respond to the blog posts of tChereCheek752
SOCW 6530 wk 8 peer responses
Respond to the blog posts of three colleagues in one or more of the following ways:
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Validate an idea in your colleague’s post with your own experience.
MUST RESPOND TO EACH ONE SEPARATELY CITE EVERYTHING AND FULL REFERENCES
PEER 1: David Jones
An Explanation of Potential Challenges for Evaluation During Your Field Education Experience
Evaluation occurs in different ways during the field education experience. I receive evaluation from my field instructor on my performance at the therapy office. I also evaluate the clients that I have interactions with while interning. Both of which can pose separate types of challenges. Receiving constructive criticism can be difficult for some. A potential challenge with receiving the evaluation and criticism from my field instructor would be my inability to do so in a short period and apply it. However, it is imperative to use this feedback to critique and affirm my own practice (Garthwait, 2017, p.36). A potential challenge that I face in my evaluation of the clients is that it may be difficult to measure outcomes in such a short amount of time. We only have 11 weeks in each semester to get involved in our client interventions and many of the circumstances require much longer than that.
An Explanation of Personal Action Plans You Might Take to Address Evaluation in Your Field Education Experience
I believe an action plan for the potential challenges faced with the evaluation from the instructor is to take notes on the information being shared and allow processing time. I write notes with questions to ensure I understand what is being said, and ask any questions I may have about improving my practice. As far as an action plan for the potential challenge of evaluating the clients, I can conduct a pre/post survey of the clients I was able to work with to see what they have learned and utilized from the class currently and again at the final weeks. I can also follow up with my field instructor after I stop interning, to see how influential I have been on them.
reference
Garthwait, C. L. (2017). The social work practicum: A guide and workbook for students (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
PEER 2
Candise Mitchell
Sometimes complex social problems require complex interventions, and sometimes they respond well to simple interventions (Thyer, 2013). This simplicity also applies to social worker procedures and protocol. Being a social worker is not an easy task. It is easy to think that it consists of just talking to others, but the interventions, research, and paperwork can be more challenging than a defiant client. Within my internship I have learned a great deal regarding client care and interactions for with adults and couples regarding trauma, domestic violence, couples counseling, anger management, and self-care just to name a few. However, the challenges within my placement largely consisted o ...
G180 Module 01 Assignment 1. Your friend is playing battleship wit.docxhanneloremccaffery
G180 Module 01 Assignment
1. Your friend is playing battleship with you. In each round you either hit or miss. List the sample space if you only play four rounds. Use H for hit and M for miss. (Hint: There will be 16 outcomes)
2. Abigail is going to a new restaurant for her birthday. She wants to choose one appetizer, one entrée, and either a side dish or a dessert. If the restaurant offers 5 appetizers, 10 entrees, 4 side dishes and 3 desserts. How many different combinations can Abigail make?
3. You are trying to form a committee of six people at work to run a group project (not including yourself). If you have fifteen coworkers to choose from, how many different committees can you form?
4. You are volunteering at your child’s school by judging the science fair. You need to assign first, second, and third place ribbons. If there are 17 students who participated, how many ways can you assign the ribbons?
Instructions: Reply to the threads of at least 2 classmates.
Each reply must be at least 450 words.
Each reply must also include a biblical integration and at least 2 peer-reviewed source citations in current APA format in addition to the text.
Trend 1
We read in Luke 14:28, "For which of you, desiring to build a tower, does not first sit down and count the cost, whether he has enough to complete it?" This speaks directly to the matter that we are not to enter into decisions lightly. We must ensure that we have the tools and resources needed to bring a plan to completion and ensure we do so in the most efficient manner possible. The same concept would apply when conducting a job analysis for an organization
The purpose of a job analysis is to ensure the the expected outcomes of a role are being achieved in the most efficient and effective ways possible (Pynes and Lombardi, 2011). Sometimes that includes evaluating a work flow, a series of processes, a specific role, or a combination of all of the above. It is of the utmost importance for an organization in any space to ensure that are constantly evaluating the productivity and work flows to ensure that are obtaining maximum results. In this week's reading we learn of several different tools that can be utilized when conducting a job analysis.
During my time as a nurse manager in the hospital setting, I actually had to enlist the assistance of our Human Resources to evaluate our work flow as we were undergoing a reorganization of two of my departments. Due to a drastic decrease in the number of deliveries we were having in our labor department, we were faced with the charge to combine our Post-Partum unit with our Women's Health unit. This led to a considerable challenge when taking into account the fact that there were newborns on the post-partum unit. This raised considerable concerns regarding cross-contamination between women's health patients (who may have been considerably ill) and post-partum patients and newborns. We have to take a complete inventory of the sk ...
Collaboration and Teamwork in Health Care Scoring GuideCRI.docxclarebernice
Collaboration and Teamwork in Health Care Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Explain the
concept of
collaboration in
health care.
Does not explain
the concept of
collaboration in
health care.
Explains the
concept of
collaboration but
not in the context
of health care, or
the explanation is
missing key
elements.
Explains the
concept of
collaboration in
health care.
Explains the
concept of
collaboration in
health care and
describes the
unique aspects of
collaboration in
health care.
Describe the
benefits of
effective
collaboration
and teamwork in
health care for
patients,
organizations,
and team
members.
Does not describe
the benefits of
effective
collaboration and
teamwork in
health care for
patients,
organizations,
and team
members.
Describes the
benefits of
effective
collaboration and
teamwork in
health care for
patients,
organizations, or
team members (or
two of these) but
not all three.
Describes the
benefits of
effective
collaboration and
teamwork in
health care for
patients,
organizations,
and team
members.
Describes the
benefits of effective
collaboration and
teamwork in health
care for patients,
organizations, and
team members and
considers the
consequences of
ineffective
collaboration and
teamwork.
Describe the
characteristics
and concepts
required for
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Does not describe
the characteristics
and concepts
required for
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Lists the
characteristics
and concepts
required for
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Describes the
characteristics
and concepts
required for
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Describes the
characteristics and
concepts required
for effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration and
explains how each
contributes to more
effective
collaboration.
Describe barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Does not describe
barriers to
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Identifies barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Describes
barriers to
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Describes barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration and
considers possible
causes for the
barriers.
Identify
evidence-based
strategies to
overcome
barriers to
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Does not identify
evidence-based
strategies to
overcome barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Identifies
strategies to
overcome barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration but
does not provide
Identifies
evidence-based
strategies to
overcome
barriers to
effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration.
Identifies evidence-
based strategies to
overcome barriers
to effective
interdisciplinary
collaboration and
suggests methods
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHE ...
Similar to Workplace Environment Assessment Homework 3.docx (11)
This comprehensive program covers essential aspects of performance marketing, growth strategies, and tactics, such as search engine optimization (SEO), pay-per-click (PPC) advertising, content marketing, social media marketing, and more
Want to move your career forward? Looking to build your leadership skills while helping others learn, grow, and improve their skills? Seeking someone who can guide you in achieving these goals?
You can accomplish this through a mentoring partnership. Learn more about the PMISSC Mentoring Program, where you’ll discover the incredible benefits of becoming a mentor or mentee. This program is designed to foster professional growth, enhance skills, and build a strong network within the project management community. Whether you're looking to share your expertise or seeking guidance to advance your career, the PMI Mentoring Program offers valuable opportunities for personal and professional development.
Watch this to learn:
* Overview of the PMISSC Mentoring Program: Mission, vision, and objectives.
* Benefits for Volunteer Mentors: Professional development, networking, personal satisfaction, and recognition.
* Advantages for Mentees: Career advancement, skill development, networking, and confidence building.
* Program Structure and Expectations: Mentor-mentee matching process, program phases, and time commitment.
* Success Stories and Testimonials: Inspiring examples from past participants.
* How to Get Involved: Steps to participate and resources available for support throughout the program.
Learn how you can make a difference in the project management community and take the next step in your professional journey.
About Hector Del Castillo
Hector is VP of Professional Development at the PMI Silver Spring Chapter, and CEO of Bold PM. He's a mid-market growth product executive and changemaker. He works with mid-market product-driven software executives to solve their biggest growth problems. He scales product growth, optimizes ops and builds loyal customers. He has reduced customer churn 33%, and boosted sales 47% for clients. He makes a significant impact by building and launching world-changing AI-powered products. If you're looking for an engaging and inspiring speaker to spark creativity and innovation within your organization, set up an appointment to discuss your specific needs and identify a suitable topic to inspire your audience at your next corporate conference, symposium, executive summit, or planning retreat.
About PMI Silver Spring Chapter
We are a branch of the Project Management Institute. We offer a platform for project management professionals in Silver Spring, MD, and the DC/Baltimore metro area. Monthly meetings facilitate networking, knowledge sharing, and professional development. For event details, visit pmissc.org.
1. Workplace Environment Assessment Homework 3
Workplace Environment Assessment Homework 3Workplace Environment Assessment
Homework 3Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.Reflect on the output of
your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback
received from colleagues.Select and review one or more of the following articles found in
the Resources:Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)Clark (2018)Clark (2015)Griffin
and Clark (2014)The Assignment (3-6 pages total):Part 1: Work Environment Assessment
(1-2 pages)Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this
Module’s Discussion.Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you
completed on your workplace.Identify two things that surprised you about the results and
one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.Explain what
the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.Part 2:
Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE
PAPERSBriefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you
selected.Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results
of your Work Environment Assessment.Explain how your organization could apply the
theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or
create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.Part 3: Evidence-Based
Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)Recommend at
least two strategies, ed in the literature, that can be implemented to address any
shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.Recommend at least two
strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work
Environment Assessment.Incivility at the workplace is common in nursing education and
clinical practice (Clark, Olender, Cardoni, & Kenski, 2011). Workplace incivility can be
defined as repeated offensive, disrespectful, or discouraging behavior, misuse of power, or
unfair punishments that make the receiver distressed and feel shamed; creating strain; and
decreasing the employee’s self-confidence (Warner, Sommers, Zappa, & Thornlow, 2016).
Uncivil behaviors can appear in different forms and may cause profound effects on their
recipients. Workplace Environment Assessment Homework 3The work environment
assessment of my workplace resulted in a score 35. According to Clark (2015), a score
below 50 in the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory indicates a very unhealthy work
environment. It is surprising that two statements where the organization scored the highest
were those that stated individuals and collective achievements are celebrated and
publicized ; and that use of effective conflicts resolution skills, (Clark, 2015). The publicity
2. and celebration of individual and collective achievements is a new thing that has just been
initiated and we are going strong with it. The staffs are vastly knowledgeable on conflicts
resolutions. The organization is neutral on communication, living by shared vision and
employee are treated in fair and respectful manner. Somewhat untrue about
communication. The organization scored low in all other aspect of the assessment.Going by
this score form Workplace assessment, I will say the organization is a very unhealthy place.
We discuss this almost every day with other staff in my department. Unhealthy place is not
safe for both staff and even patients Communication is very poor. Nobody has the idea of
when decisions are made which means staffs are excluded from decision making. The staff
feels that Patient’s acuity is not put into consideration before staffing is made which made
the workload voluminous and makes the environment unsafe. Staff from other departments
with no basic knowledge of crisis prevention intervention are been thrown to the
psychiatry units. The staff doesn’t feel ed by the management. The organization is not able
to retain staff because the salary is not competitive enough and are not true to their words
in terms of benefits, so there is very high turnover of staff. Only few staff has stayed for
more than 2 years. Most new staff leaves between 2 weeks and 6 months.One occasion of
incivility that I have experienced was when the supervisor spoke to me in a disrespectful
manner because one unidentified person called from ER and asked if we had an extra
mental health worker and I responded no. She said I was being unfair and there is a reason
while they called for a help. I requested to speak to her in the staff room with one other staff
that was with me when the call came in . She apologized after I had expressed myself
because we were never staff with an extra staff. I couldn’t have sent any staff to ER because
I have an agency staff working with me who does know these patients. I could have created
an unsafe place for patient and the staffs when we were already short staff and an agency
staff?.To create a high-performance team, implementation of strategies to improve work
environment safety is necessary . To create an even stronger work team, it is vital that
establishing excellent communication between employees be present in the organization.
Respect and professional communication in a healthcare organization produces improved
outcomes for patients and more civil employees (Griffin & Clark, 2014).ReferencesClark, C.
M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse
Today, 10(11), 18-23. Retrieved fromhttps://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdfClark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., &
Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leaders
perspective. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324-330.
doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive
rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later.
Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535-542. doi:10.3928/00220124-
20141122-02Warrner, J., Sommers, K., Zappa, M., & Thornlow, D. (2016). Decreasing
workplace incivility. Nursing Management, 47(1), 22-30. doi:
10.1097/01.NUMA.0000475622.91398.c3 Workplace Environment Assessment Homework
3