What Is Public Administration?
Even providing a descriptive definition of
public administration is difficult. What is
“public” and what is “private” will vary
greatly from society to society. Public
administration has become “government’s
central instrument for dealing with general
social problems.”
Especially since the 1930s, the executive
branch of government has been the focus
for policy and program initiation as well as
implementation; thus, public
administration has come to mean far more
than simply those activities associated with
carrying out legislative acts and judicial
orders.
THE ROLES OF THE THREE BRANCHES
One approach to defining public
administration is to identify how it relates
to the three traditional branches of
government: the executive, the
legislative, and the judicial.
Legislative and Administrative Powers
Administration as execution―that is, carrying
out laws passed by the legislature. This view
makes a clear distinction between legislative
and administrative powers: The legislative
demonstrates the former when it passes a law,
but what the executive branch then does with
that law becomes “administration.”
The legislative and executive branches are
not completely separate entities. The latter
has the administrative power; thus, public
administration is “what the executive
branch does.” The judiciary stands apart
from administration, deciding cases
between private parties and restraining
public administrators from
unconstitutional, illegal, and arbitrary acts.
Other Involvement of Legislatures in
Administration
Legislatures directly oversee the activities of
some administrative agencies, such as, at the
national level, the Government Printing Office,
the Library of Congress, the Congressional
Budget Office, and the General Accounting
Office, which have important functions and
employ substantial numbers of workers.
Thus, every day’s work in an administrative
agency is characterized by very close
relationships between the executive and
legislative branches―a pattern of continuous
executive-legislative interaction found at all
levels of government.
Considered as a process― that is, as the use of
a body of knowledge and techniques for the
effective management of any
enterprise―administration is needed in
legislatures just as in other entities. If they are
to function satisfactorily, legislatures must
constantly improve their own internal
organization and procedures; their failure to do
so accounts for much of today’s dissatisfaction
with lawmakers. Thus, looking at the legislature
from the inside, we find that it needs good
administration.
The Judiciary
The Judiciary has long been a powerful force in
shaping public administration, and it is increasingly
so in present times, as members of the general
public, government employees, inmates of
institutions, and others press their rights in court.
When the courts determine the constitutionality of
legislative enactments and administrative acts, they
are determining what kinds of public services can be
rendered and under what conditions, such as when
the federal courts established the requirement for
desegregation of the public schools.
Besides ruling on constitutional
requirements, the courts also protect
against ultra vires acts―that is, when the
officials exceed their legal authority. Court
actions are instituted by individual citizens,
public-interest groups, other organizations,
and even legislators to force public
officials to take action required by law or
to desist from incorrect interpretations of
their responsibilities under the law.
POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION
The administration-policy dichotomy is the
basis for another attempt at definition: Policy is
made by the legislative in the form of laws and
is carried out by the executive branch. At first
glance this interpretation may seem identical to
to the distinction between legislative and
administrative powers.
Early writers in public administration made
a distinction between policy and
administration. They were anxious to keep
politics out of administration; legislators
represented politics, and with their allies in
the party organizations and their
influences on the administration in power,
they could prevent the professionalization
of the public service. Accordingly, the
concept of a neutral, nonpolicy-making
bureaucracy developed.
Not only do administrative officials have more
policy decisions to make, but the problems they
must resolve are more difficult, sometimes
exceedingly so. Goals established in the enabling
legislation are typically stated in very general
terms. In effect, even in implicitly, lawmakers
request the administrative agencies to study the
problems more and develop policy solutions. Many
of the problems may remain insoluble, but the
point is that the administrative branch bears the
heaviest responsibility for typing to solve them.
ADMINISTRATION AND POLITICS
It should be evident that there is no clear
separation between administration and
politics. “The exercise of discretionary
power, the making of value choices, is a
characteristic and increasing function of
administrators and bureaucrats; they are
thus importantly engaged in politics.”
Any participation in the formulation of
public policies entails involvement in
politics; it is a political act when an
administrator recommends legislation and
makes policy decisions in carrying out a law.
Since the politics is “the process by which
power and influence are acquired and
exercised,” public officials who seek power
and influence with legislators and pressure
groups in support of the programs they
administer participate in the political
process.
PRIVATE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Any definition of public administration must
deal with how it is similar to, or different
from, private administration. The similarities
are great, for administration as a process is
by no means to the public sector. Every
human organization, the key to successful
operation is the effective utilization of
human and physical resources.
This is the work of administration or, as it is
also frequently called, management. The
problems of all public organizations are not
the same, just as the problems of private
ones vary from company to company. Each
organization, public or private, must meet
the challenges of its particular environment.
The exact form of administration varies
according to the kind of undertaking.
Because the legislature and the general
public are directly concerned with its
actions, no public organization can ever be
exactly the same as a private one. In public
administration, everything a government
agency does is the public’s business. Tax
money is being used, so every citizen has
the right to know how it is spent and to
criticize the decisions of public officials.
Public officials operate in a goldfish bowl;
they are constantly subject to searching
outside scrutiny.
Private companies want satisfied clients, and
they are also increasingly subject to
government regulation, all of which makes
public relations an important element in
business success. Nevertheless, companies
still remain private in character, and their
internal operations are to a large extent their
own business and not that of the general
public. Government is different also in that
no private company can equal it in its size
and in the diversity of its activities.
DEFINITION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
We have traveled a long way in the search
for a satisfactory definition of public
administration, but the reason for doing so
can now be appreciated. No condensed
definition can encompass all of the
preceding points. Those characteristics can,
however, be presented in the form of a brief
summary that will constitute the definition.
Public Administration
1. is cooperative group effort in a public setting;
2. covers all three branches of government―executive,
legislative, and judicial―and their interrelationships.
3. has an important role in the formulation of public
policy and is thus a part of the political process;
4. is different in significant ways from private
administration;
5. is closely associated with numerous private groups
and individuals in providing services to the
community.
THE STUDY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
We offer an explanation of the statement
made earlier that public administration as a
field of study is substantially different today
from what it was at its inception. The
difference involves not only the offerings at
academic institutions but also the subjects
dealt with in the literature of the field and
discussed at meetings of the professional
societies.
Public Administration and Policy Analysis
The preceding discussion emphasized an important
role that the administrative branch plays in policy
formulation. The effectiveness of public programs
depends greatly upon how wisely this policy
formulation function is carried out how thoroughly
the actual results achieved with these programs are
evaluated. We use the term policy analysis to cover
both these aspects of the policy role of public
administration.
THE INCREASED INTEREST IN POLICY
ANALYSIS
For various reasons, public policy-making in
presently undergoing critical scrutiny. The
general public is much concerned with
government policies, as are legislators,
administrators, interest groups, the media, and
others. The larger the scope of government, the
more important the role of public policy, and
that scope is continually being enlarged.
The public is better educated, better
informed, and more insistent on
participating in the formulation and
administration of policies. Government,
like other contemporary institutions,
possesses the knowledge and means to
influence human destinies greatly, with
dangerous consequences if errors are
made in the policies adopted.
Since public administration has long had
an action-and-application orientation, it is
one of the fields now emphasizing policy
analysis. Even when the focus was limited
to management processes, the study of the
actual functioning of public agencies was
reform movements. When the
administration-policy dichotomy was
discarded, detailed analyses of policy
formulation began to be made.
Other writers have analyzed the role of pressure
groups―including administrative agencies―in the
formulation and administration of policy, stressing the
power exercised in particular policy areas by coalitions
of lobbying organizations, public administrators, and
individual legislators. The relationship between
organizational form and policy preferences was
documented, and the so-called Politics of Organization
emerged as a standard topic in the study of
administration. Comparative administration developed
as a distinct field, one of its contributions being to
show the relationship between cultural characteristics
and government choices.
SOME KEY POINTS ABOUT PUBLIC POLICY
Political scientist Charles O. Jones makes a
number of general observations about public
policy that provide a good beginning point for
consideration of policy analysis. 12 of Jones’s
“propositional assumptions”:
1. Events in society are interpreted in different ways
by different people at different times.
2. Many problems may result from the same event.
3. People have varying degrees of access to the policy
process in government.
4. Not all public problems are acted in government.
5. Many private problems are acted on in government.
6. Most problems are not solved by government.
7. “Policymakers are not faced with a given problem”
8. Problems and demands are constantly being defined
and redefined in the policy process.
9. Policymakers sometimes define problems for people
who have not defined problems for themselves.
10. Much policy is made without the problem’s ever
having been clearly defined.
11.All policy systems have a bias.
12.No ideal policy system exists apart from the
preferences of the architect of that system.

What-Is-Public-Administration.pptx

  • 1.
    What Is PublicAdministration? Even providing a descriptive definition of public administration is difficult. What is “public” and what is “private” will vary greatly from society to society. Public administration has become “government’s central instrument for dealing with general social problems.”
  • 2.
    Especially since the1930s, the executive branch of government has been the focus for policy and program initiation as well as implementation; thus, public administration has come to mean far more than simply those activities associated with carrying out legislative acts and judicial orders.
  • 3.
    THE ROLES OFTHE THREE BRANCHES One approach to defining public administration is to identify how it relates to the three traditional branches of government: the executive, the legislative, and the judicial.
  • 4.
    Legislative and AdministrativePowers Administration as execution―that is, carrying out laws passed by the legislature. This view makes a clear distinction between legislative and administrative powers: The legislative demonstrates the former when it passes a law, but what the executive branch then does with that law becomes “administration.”
  • 5.
    The legislative andexecutive branches are not completely separate entities. The latter has the administrative power; thus, public administration is “what the executive branch does.” The judiciary stands apart from administration, deciding cases between private parties and restraining public administrators from unconstitutional, illegal, and arbitrary acts.
  • 6.
    Other Involvement ofLegislatures in Administration Legislatures directly oversee the activities of some administrative agencies, such as, at the national level, the Government Printing Office, the Library of Congress, the Congressional Budget Office, and the General Accounting Office, which have important functions and employ substantial numbers of workers.
  • 7.
    Thus, every day’swork in an administrative agency is characterized by very close relationships between the executive and legislative branches―a pattern of continuous executive-legislative interaction found at all levels of government.
  • 8.
    Considered as aprocess― that is, as the use of a body of knowledge and techniques for the effective management of any enterprise―administration is needed in legislatures just as in other entities. If they are to function satisfactorily, legislatures must constantly improve their own internal organization and procedures; their failure to do so accounts for much of today’s dissatisfaction with lawmakers. Thus, looking at the legislature from the inside, we find that it needs good administration.
  • 9.
    The Judiciary The Judiciaryhas long been a powerful force in shaping public administration, and it is increasingly so in present times, as members of the general public, government employees, inmates of institutions, and others press their rights in court. When the courts determine the constitutionality of legislative enactments and administrative acts, they are determining what kinds of public services can be rendered and under what conditions, such as when the federal courts established the requirement for desegregation of the public schools.
  • 10.
    Besides ruling onconstitutional requirements, the courts also protect against ultra vires acts―that is, when the officials exceed their legal authority. Court actions are instituted by individual citizens, public-interest groups, other organizations, and even legislators to force public officials to take action required by law or to desist from incorrect interpretations of their responsibilities under the law.
  • 11.
    POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION Theadministration-policy dichotomy is the basis for another attempt at definition: Policy is made by the legislative in the form of laws and is carried out by the executive branch. At first glance this interpretation may seem identical to to the distinction between legislative and administrative powers.
  • 12.
    Early writers inpublic administration made a distinction between policy and administration. They were anxious to keep politics out of administration; legislators represented politics, and with their allies in the party organizations and their influences on the administration in power, they could prevent the professionalization of the public service. Accordingly, the concept of a neutral, nonpolicy-making bureaucracy developed.
  • 13.
    Not only doadministrative officials have more policy decisions to make, but the problems they must resolve are more difficult, sometimes exceedingly so. Goals established in the enabling legislation are typically stated in very general terms. In effect, even in implicitly, lawmakers request the administrative agencies to study the problems more and develop policy solutions. Many of the problems may remain insoluble, but the point is that the administrative branch bears the heaviest responsibility for typing to solve them.
  • 14.
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLITICS Itshould be evident that there is no clear separation between administration and politics. “The exercise of discretionary power, the making of value choices, is a characteristic and increasing function of administrators and bureaucrats; they are thus importantly engaged in politics.”
  • 15.
    Any participation inthe formulation of public policies entails involvement in politics; it is a political act when an administrator recommends legislation and makes policy decisions in carrying out a law. Since the politics is “the process by which power and influence are acquired and exercised,” public officials who seek power and influence with legislators and pressure groups in support of the programs they administer participate in the political process.
  • 16.
    PRIVATE AND PUBLICADMINISTRATION Any definition of public administration must deal with how it is similar to, or different from, private administration. The similarities are great, for administration as a process is by no means to the public sector. Every human organization, the key to successful operation is the effective utilization of human and physical resources.
  • 17.
    This is thework of administration or, as it is also frequently called, management. The problems of all public organizations are not the same, just as the problems of private ones vary from company to company. Each organization, public or private, must meet the challenges of its particular environment. The exact form of administration varies according to the kind of undertaking.
  • 18.
    Because the legislatureand the general public are directly concerned with its actions, no public organization can ever be exactly the same as a private one. In public administration, everything a government agency does is the public’s business. Tax money is being used, so every citizen has the right to know how it is spent and to criticize the decisions of public officials. Public officials operate in a goldfish bowl; they are constantly subject to searching outside scrutiny.
  • 19.
    Private companies wantsatisfied clients, and they are also increasingly subject to government regulation, all of which makes public relations an important element in business success. Nevertheless, companies still remain private in character, and their internal operations are to a large extent their own business and not that of the general public. Government is different also in that no private company can equal it in its size and in the diversity of its activities.
  • 20.
    DEFINITION OF PUBLICADMINISTRATION We have traveled a long way in the search for a satisfactory definition of public administration, but the reason for doing so can now be appreciated. No condensed definition can encompass all of the preceding points. Those characteristics can, however, be presented in the form of a brief summary that will constitute the definition.
  • 21.
    Public Administration 1. iscooperative group effort in a public setting; 2. covers all three branches of government―executive, legislative, and judicial―and their interrelationships. 3. has an important role in the formulation of public policy and is thus a part of the political process; 4. is different in significant ways from private administration; 5. is closely associated with numerous private groups and individuals in providing services to the community.
  • 22.
    THE STUDY OFPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION We offer an explanation of the statement made earlier that public administration as a field of study is substantially different today from what it was at its inception. The difference involves not only the offerings at academic institutions but also the subjects dealt with in the literature of the field and discussed at meetings of the professional societies.
  • 23.
    Public Administration andPolicy Analysis The preceding discussion emphasized an important role that the administrative branch plays in policy formulation. The effectiveness of public programs depends greatly upon how wisely this policy formulation function is carried out how thoroughly the actual results achieved with these programs are evaluated. We use the term policy analysis to cover both these aspects of the policy role of public administration.
  • 24.
    THE INCREASED INTERESTIN POLICY ANALYSIS For various reasons, public policy-making in presently undergoing critical scrutiny. The general public is much concerned with government policies, as are legislators, administrators, interest groups, the media, and others. The larger the scope of government, the more important the role of public policy, and that scope is continually being enlarged.
  • 25.
    The public isbetter educated, better informed, and more insistent on participating in the formulation and administration of policies. Government, like other contemporary institutions, possesses the knowledge and means to influence human destinies greatly, with dangerous consequences if errors are made in the policies adopted.
  • 26.
    Since public administrationhas long had an action-and-application orientation, it is one of the fields now emphasizing policy analysis. Even when the focus was limited to management processes, the study of the actual functioning of public agencies was reform movements. When the administration-policy dichotomy was discarded, detailed analyses of policy formulation began to be made.
  • 27.
    Other writers haveanalyzed the role of pressure groups―including administrative agencies―in the formulation and administration of policy, stressing the power exercised in particular policy areas by coalitions of lobbying organizations, public administrators, and individual legislators. The relationship between organizational form and policy preferences was documented, and the so-called Politics of Organization emerged as a standard topic in the study of administration. Comparative administration developed as a distinct field, one of its contributions being to show the relationship between cultural characteristics and government choices.
  • 28.
    SOME KEY POINTSABOUT PUBLIC POLICY Political scientist Charles O. Jones makes a number of general observations about public policy that provide a good beginning point for consideration of policy analysis. 12 of Jones’s “propositional assumptions”:
  • 29.
    1. Events insociety are interpreted in different ways by different people at different times. 2. Many problems may result from the same event. 3. People have varying degrees of access to the policy process in government. 4. Not all public problems are acted in government. 5. Many private problems are acted on in government. 6. Most problems are not solved by government.
  • 30.
    7. “Policymakers arenot faced with a given problem” 8. Problems and demands are constantly being defined and redefined in the policy process. 9. Policymakers sometimes define problems for people who have not defined problems for themselves. 10. Much policy is made without the problem’s ever having been clearly defined. 11.All policy systems have a bias. 12.No ideal policy system exists apart from the preferences of the architect of that system.