NAPAC faces challenges related to its financial dependence, lack of independence from the executive, and having an undefined relationship with the Attorney General. It also struggles with timely submission of audit reports, technical support for PAC members, and the non-binding nature of its resolutions. Solutions proposed include making the PAC chair from the opposition, increasing the Attorney General's independence, engaging civil society, enhancing citizen participation, and providing training to boost technical capacity.

1. What does NAPAC do now?
 Financial constraint 
 PAC not independent of executive
 Regulatory framework to define the relationship/ linkages between a
strong PAC and A-G
 PAC Challenge – Dependence (funding; reliance on parliament as a
whole for an effective PAC; timely submissionof audit report by A-G;
technical support to PAC from A-G) and Independence of the PACs and
Members of PAC  (NB suggestionPAC Chair should be from
the opposition)
 A-G Challenge – Independence of the A-G (funding; empowered
through technical training; need to collaborate closely with PAC
around A-G budget; timely submissionof info by Accountant-General)


2.  CSOs – Engaging civil society as a separate source of information 
 Enhance citizen participation in PAC sittings
 Non-binding nature of resolutions/ outcomes of PAC reports – how to
enforce recommendations/ lack of sanction? 
 Leadership/ Political Will cf Political Partisanship
 Lack of knowledge on how to analyze audit reports/ A-G preparing a
PAC friendly report?
 Non-passage of Audit Bill
Stakeholders Not in the Room
 Council of Speakers?
How

3.  Training of PAC/ Technical Capacity 
 International engagement
 Development of best practice
