This document discusses how healthcare professionals use PICOT questions to efficiently find relevant information to answer clinical questions. It provides an example of a PICOT question asking if hand hygiene using soap and water or hand sanitizers is more effective in reducing hospital-acquired infections in geriatric patients over three months. The author describes searching two databases, limiting results to five years, and using search terms related to the question. Boolean operators were added to change the search significantly by decreasing and increasing relevant article amounts. Strategies to increase search rigor and effectiveness include using Boolean operators, limiting year ranges, searching multiple databases, and getting librarian assistance.
Searching Databases (APA 7 format and at least 3-4 references)Wh.docxrtodd280
Searching Databases (APA 7 format and at least 3-4 references)
When you decide to purchase a new car, you first decide what is important to you. If mileage and dependability are the important factors, you will search for data focused more on these factors and less on color options and sound systems.
The same holds true when searching for research evidence to guide your clinical inquiry and professional decisions. Developing a formula for an answerable, researchable question that addresses your need will make the search process much more effective. One such formula is the PICO(T) format.
In this Discussion, you will transform a clinical inquiry into a searchable question in PICO(T) format, so you can search the electronic databases more effectively and efficiently. You will share this PICO(T) question and examine strategies you might use to increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search on your PICO(T) question.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Review the materials offering guidance on using databases, performing keyword searches, and developing PICO(T) questions provided in the Resources.
Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least two different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
Review the Resources for guidance and develop a PICO(T) question of interest to you for further study. It is suggested that an Intervention-type PICOT question be developed as these seem to work best for this course.
By Day 3 of Week 4
Post a brief description of your clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question. Then, post your PICO(T) question, the search terms used, and the names of at least two databases used for your PICO(T) question. Describe your search results in terms of the number of articles returned on original research and how this changed as you added search terms using your Boolean operators. Finally, explain strategies you might make to increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search on your PICO(T) question. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 4
Respond
to at least
two
of your colleagues
on two different days
and provide further suggestions on how their database search might be improved.
Mike RE: Discussion - Week 4/Initial (at least 2-3 references and APA 7 format)
Given the diverse nature of the health care industry, the ubiquitous array of multi faceted axillary services, the sector we service the most sometimes becomes the focus of our interest given the opportunity and longevity in such an institution. For the purpose of .
This presentation was funded by CDC and PEPFAR through the SUCCEED project at Stellenbosch University. The presentation was delivered by Ms Lynn Hendricks from the Centre for Evidence Based Health Care in July 2017
Searching and Critiquing the EvidenceBring to mind the various.docxedmondpburgess27164
Searching and Critiquing the Evidence
Bring to mind the various practice problems you and your colleagues have been considering in this course. What insights might the literature provide with regard to these issues? How should you evaluate the research? And, why is it important to review and critique this information?
This Discussion addresses strategies for searching the literature in order to critique existing evidence. Please note that this Discussion is related to Application Assignment #4, which is assigned this week. You are strongly encouraged to read through that assignment now.
To prepare:
Review the Walden Library Webinars presented in the Learning Resources.
Recall the practice problem and theoretical framework you identified for the Week 5
Discussion
(See attached file)
. Using the Walden Library and other professional databases, conduct a search and locate four
(4)
appropriate primary research articles
one of which is a systematic review.
Review the articles and determine what level of evidence they represent. Using the critique strategies presented in the Learning Resources as a guide, consider how the articles you located either support or weaken the merit of your theoretical framework or the importance of your practice problem.
By Wednesday 7/05/17, post 550 words essay in APA format with 2 references from the list below, as well as the 4 references for the articles review that include the level one headings as numbered below:
post
a cohesive response that addresses the following:
1)
How does the literature strengthen or weaken the merit of your selected theoretical framework and practice problem?
2)
What levels of evidence are most prevalent in these articles?
(I, II, III, IV or V)
3)
Why do you think that level of evidence is most prevalent?
Walden Library Webinars:
Conducting a Literature Search on a Clinical Research Question. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/nursing#s-lg-box-9896498
Evidence-Based Health Research Retried from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1523116
Introduction to Health Science Research.
Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-9897916
Medical Research: Finding Reviews. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1525868
Medical Research: Finding Studies by Type. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1526057
Medical Research: Health Policies and Legal Cases. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1526434
Recommended Webinars:
Webinars on Library Skills. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/libraryskillswebinars
Evidence Based Practice for NURS 6052. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webin.
Searching Databases (APA 7 format and at least 3-4 references)Wh.docxrtodd280
Searching Databases (APA 7 format and at least 3-4 references)
When you decide to purchase a new car, you first decide what is important to you. If mileage and dependability are the important factors, you will search for data focused more on these factors and less on color options and sound systems.
The same holds true when searching for research evidence to guide your clinical inquiry and professional decisions. Developing a formula for an answerable, researchable question that addresses your need will make the search process much more effective. One such formula is the PICO(T) format.
In this Discussion, you will transform a clinical inquiry into a searchable question in PICO(T) format, so you can search the electronic databases more effectively and efficiently. You will share this PICO(T) question and examine strategies you might use to increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search on your PICO(T) question.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Review the materials offering guidance on using databases, performing keyword searches, and developing PICO(T) questions provided in the Resources.
Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least two different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
Review the Resources for guidance and develop a PICO(T) question of interest to you for further study. It is suggested that an Intervention-type PICOT question be developed as these seem to work best for this course.
By Day 3 of Week 4
Post a brief description of your clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question. Then, post your PICO(T) question, the search terms used, and the names of at least two databases used for your PICO(T) question. Describe your search results in terms of the number of articles returned on original research and how this changed as you added search terms using your Boolean operators. Finally, explain strategies you might make to increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search on your PICO(T) question. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 4
Respond
to at least
two
of your colleagues
on two different days
and provide further suggestions on how their database search might be improved.
Mike RE: Discussion - Week 4/Initial (at least 2-3 references and APA 7 format)
Given the diverse nature of the health care industry, the ubiquitous array of multi faceted axillary services, the sector we service the most sometimes becomes the focus of our interest given the opportunity and longevity in such an institution. For the purpose of .
This presentation was funded by CDC and PEPFAR through the SUCCEED project at Stellenbosch University. The presentation was delivered by Ms Lynn Hendricks from the Centre for Evidence Based Health Care in July 2017
Searching and Critiquing the EvidenceBring to mind the various.docxedmondpburgess27164
Searching and Critiquing the Evidence
Bring to mind the various practice problems you and your colleagues have been considering in this course. What insights might the literature provide with regard to these issues? How should you evaluate the research? And, why is it important to review and critique this information?
This Discussion addresses strategies for searching the literature in order to critique existing evidence. Please note that this Discussion is related to Application Assignment #4, which is assigned this week. You are strongly encouraged to read through that assignment now.
To prepare:
Review the Walden Library Webinars presented in the Learning Resources.
Recall the practice problem and theoretical framework you identified for the Week 5
Discussion
(See attached file)
. Using the Walden Library and other professional databases, conduct a search and locate four
(4)
appropriate primary research articles
one of which is a systematic review.
Review the articles and determine what level of evidence they represent. Using the critique strategies presented in the Learning Resources as a guide, consider how the articles you located either support or weaken the merit of your theoretical framework or the importance of your practice problem.
By Wednesday 7/05/17, post 550 words essay in APA format with 2 references from the list below, as well as the 4 references for the articles review that include the level one headings as numbered below:
post
a cohesive response that addresses the following:
1)
How does the literature strengthen or weaken the merit of your selected theoretical framework and practice problem?
2)
What levels of evidence are most prevalent in these articles?
(I, II, III, IV or V)
3)
Why do you think that level of evidence is most prevalent?
Walden Library Webinars:
Conducting a Literature Search on a Clinical Research Question. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/nursing#s-lg-box-9896498
Evidence-Based Health Research Retried from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1523116
Introduction to Health Science Research.
Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-9897916
Medical Research: Finding Reviews. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1525868
Medical Research: Finding Studies by Type. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1526057
Medical Research: Health Policies and Legal Cases. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1526434
Recommended Webinars:
Webinars on Library Skills. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/libraryskillswebinars
Evidence Based Practice for NURS 6052. Retrieved from:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webin.
NURS-6052N-37, Essent of Evidence-Based Pract.2017Discussion-1.docxcarlibradley31429
NURS-6052N-37, Essent of Evidence-Based Pract.2017
Discussion:-1
Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice
In your practice as a nurse, you may use procedures and methods that did not necessarily originate in evidence, but instead were derived from informal and unwritten conventions, traditions, and observations. While these techniques may have merit, practices are constantly being updated and contradicted by information from scholarly research studies and professional guidelines. This new information serves as “evidence” for revising practices to improve outcomes across health care.
Based on this evidence, you can formulate a question. In this Discussion, you consider the use of evidence-based practice in your own organization and formulate a question that you will need to answer for your portfolio project. This is called a PICOT question. You will also investigate strategies for overcoming barriers to implementing evidence-based practice (EBP).
To prepare:
Consider a recent clinical experience in which you were providing care for a patient.
Determine the extent to which the care that you provided was based on evidence and research findings or supported only by your organization’s standard procedures. How do you know if the tasks were based on research?
What questions have you thought about in a particular area of care such as a procedure or policy?
Review Chapter 2, pages 31–34 on “Asking Well worded Clinical Questions” in Polit & Beck and consult the resource from the Walden Student Center for Success: Clinical Question Anatomy & examples of PICOT questions (found in this week’s Learning Resources). Formulate your background questions and PICOT question.
Reflect on the barriers that might inhibit the implementation of evidence-based practice in your clinical environment.
Review the article “Adopting Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Decision Making” in this week’s Learning Resources. Select one of the barriers described that is evident in your organization and formulate a plan for overcoming this barrier.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 1, “Introduction to Nursing Research in an Evidence-Based Practice Environment”
This chapter provides an introduction to nursing research, its history, and the evolution of evidence-based practice. It includes an overview of credible sources of evidences and a description of the different paradigms used in nursing research.
Chapter 2, “Evidence-Based Nursing: Translating Research Evidence into Practice”
The focus of this chapter includes an overview of the key aspects of evidence-based practice, a review of how to identify credible research and appraise its value, and, finally, a discussion on how to take the identified evidence and convert it into a practice.
Chapter 3, “Key Concepts and Steps in Qualitative and Quantitative Research.
The State of the Science in PracticeThe phrase evidence-.docxteresehearn
The State of the Science in Practice
The phrase
evidence-based practice
may be most often thought of as a clinical reference; however, research evidence is applicable in every specialty area. What types of research evidence support your work environment? How does research evidence inform your practice?
Now, how current do you think the science is that underlies your practice? How current is the evidence that supports your specialty practice guidelines?
To prepare:
Bring to mind an issue related to your practice. You may use the issue you are exploring for your EBP Project, or another current issue in your specialty area.
If possible, examine practices and/or practice guidelines established to address your selected issue and determine how current the evidence is that supports them.
Using the Walden Library, locate recently published articles that discuss research translated into evidence that applies to your selected practice issue. If you are unable to locate current articles (within the last five years), use the Internet to find evidence-based practice articles on this topic.
Consider the following questions:
How current is the science that supported the practice or practice guidelines?
What new evidence has emerged since the practice guidelines were crafted and adopted?
By tomorrow 09/11/18 12 by 10 pm, write a minimum of 550 words in APA format with at least 3 scholarly references less than 5 years old. Include the level one header as numbered below:
Post
a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:
1) Discuss the state of the scientific underpinnings that relate to your selected issue. (see my PIICOT question at the bottom of this page).
2) How current is the science that supported the practice or practice guidelines?
3) What new evidence has emerged since the practice guidelines were crafted and adopted? Provide two examples that support your assessment.
Required Readings
White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terharr, M. F. (2016).
Translation of evidence into nursing and health care practice
(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Chapter 1, “Evidence-Based Practice”
Chapter 2, “The Science of Translation and Major Frameworks”
Terry, A. J. (2018).
Clinical research for the doctor of nursing practice
(3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Pages 15-18, “The Process of Translating Evidence Into Clinical Practice”
Chapter 3, “Conducting a Literature Review”
Djulbergovic, B. (2014). A framework to bridge the gaps between evidence-based medicine, health outcomes, and improvement and implementation science.
Journal of Oncology Practice
, 10(3), 200-202.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Fineout-Overhold, E., Melnyk, B.M., Stillwell, S.B., & Williamson, K.M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step-by-step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part 1.
American Journal o ...
Janet Schnall's presentation about Evidence Based Nursing Resources at our free monthly webcast. Recording available at https://webmeeting.nih.gov/p96958659/
NER Public Health Digital Library ProjectElaine Martin
The New England Region's Public Health Digital Library Project was presented by Elaine Martin, DA, and Karen Dahlen. The project aims to build a digital public health library that will help make information resources, such as full-text journal articles, evidence-based guidelines, and systematic reviews available to public health professionals in all 50 U.S. states.
Course Project Part 1—Identifying a Researchable ProblemOne of th.docxmercylittle80626
Course Project: Part 1—Identifying a Researchable Problem
One of the most challenging aspects of EBP is to actually identify the answerable question.
—Karen Sue Davies
Formulating a question that targets the goal of your research is a challenging but essential task. The question plays a crucial role in all other aspects of the research, including the determination of the research design and theoretical perspective to be applied, which data will be collected, and which tools will be used for analysis. It is therefore essential to take the time to ensure that the research question addresses what you actually want to study. Doing so will increase your likelihood of obtaining meaningful results.
In this first component of the Course Project, you formulate questions to address a particular nursing issue or problem. You use the PICOT model—patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome—outlined in the Learning Resources to design your questions.
To prepare:
Review the article, “Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the Frameworks,” found in the Learning Resources for this week. Focus on the PICOT model for guiding the development of research questions.
Review the section beginning on page 71 of the course text, titled, “Developing and Refining Research Problems” in the course text, which focuses on analyzing the feasibility of a research problem.
Reflect on an issue or problem that you have noticed in your nursing practice. Consider the significance of this issue or problem.
Generate at least five questions that relate to the issue which you have identified. Use the criteria in your course text to select one question that would be most appropriate in terms of significance, feasibility, and interest. Be prepared to explain your rationale.
Formulate a preliminary PICO question—one that is answerable—based on your analysis. What are the PICO variables (patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome) for this question?
Note: Not all of these variables may be appropriate to every question. Be sure to analyze which are and are not relevant to your specific question.
Using the PICOT variables that you determined for your question, develop a list of at least 10 keywords that could be used when conducting a literature search to investigate current research pertaining to the question.
To complete:
Write a 3- to 4-page paper that includes the following:
A summary of your area of interest, an identification of the problem that you have selected, and an explanation of the significance of this problem for nursing practice
The 5 questions you have generated and a description of how you analyzed them for feasibility
Your preliminary PICOT question and a description of each PICOT variable relevant to your question
At least 10 possible keywords that could be used when conducting a literature search for your PICOT question and a rationale for your selections
Reference:
Davies, K. S. (2011). Formula.
NURS-6052N-37, Essent of Evidence-Based Pract.2017Discussion-1.docxcarlibradley31429
NURS-6052N-37, Essent of Evidence-Based Pract.2017
Discussion:-1
Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice
In your practice as a nurse, you may use procedures and methods that did not necessarily originate in evidence, but instead were derived from informal and unwritten conventions, traditions, and observations. While these techniques may have merit, practices are constantly being updated and contradicted by information from scholarly research studies and professional guidelines. This new information serves as “evidence” for revising practices to improve outcomes across health care.
Based on this evidence, you can formulate a question. In this Discussion, you consider the use of evidence-based practice in your own organization and formulate a question that you will need to answer for your portfolio project. This is called a PICOT question. You will also investigate strategies for overcoming barriers to implementing evidence-based practice (EBP).
To prepare:
Consider a recent clinical experience in which you were providing care for a patient.
Determine the extent to which the care that you provided was based on evidence and research findings or supported only by your organization’s standard procedures. How do you know if the tasks were based on research?
What questions have you thought about in a particular area of care such as a procedure or policy?
Review Chapter 2, pages 31–34 on “Asking Well worded Clinical Questions” in Polit & Beck and consult the resource from the Walden Student Center for Success: Clinical Question Anatomy & examples of PICOT questions (found in this week’s Learning Resources). Formulate your background questions and PICOT question.
Reflect on the barriers that might inhibit the implementation of evidence-based practice in your clinical environment.
Review the article “Adopting Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Decision Making” in this week’s Learning Resources. Select one of the barriers described that is evident in your organization and formulate a plan for overcoming this barrier.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 1, “Introduction to Nursing Research in an Evidence-Based Practice Environment”
This chapter provides an introduction to nursing research, its history, and the evolution of evidence-based practice. It includes an overview of credible sources of evidences and a description of the different paradigms used in nursing research.
Chapter 2, “Evidence-Based Nursing: Translating Research Evidence into Practice”
The focus of this chapter includes an overview of the key aspects of evidence-based practice, a review of how to identify credible research and appraise its value, and, finally, a discussion on how to take the identified evidence and convert it into a practice.
Chapter 3, “Key Concepts and Steps in Qualitative and Quantitative Research.
The State of the Science in PracticeThe phrase evidence-.docxteresehearn
The State of the Science in Practice
The phrase
evidence-based practice
may be most often thought of as a clinical reference; however, research evidence is applicable in every specialty area. What types of research evidence support your work environment? How does research evidence inform your practice?
Now, how current do you think the science is that underlies your practice? How current is the evidence that supports your specialty practice guidelines?
To prepare:
Bring to mind an issue related to your practice. You may use the issue you are exploring for your EBP Project, or another current issue in your specialty area.
If possible, examine practices and/or practice guidelines established to address your selected issue and determine how current the evidence is that supports them.
Using the Walden Library, locate recently published articles that discuss research translated into evidence that applies to your selected practice issue. If you are unable to locate current articles (within the last five years), use the Internet to find evidence-based practice articles on this topic.
Consider the following questions:
How current is the science that supported the practice or practice guidelines?
What new evidence has emerged since the practice guidelines were crafted and adopted?
By tomorrow 09/11/18 12 by 10 pm, write a minimum of 550 words in APA format with at least 3 scholarly references less than 5 years old. Include the level one header as numbered below:
Post
a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:
1) Discuss the state of the scientific underpinnings that relate to your selected issue. (see my PIICOT question at the bottom of this page).
2) How current is the science that supported the practice or practice guidelines?
3) What new evidence has emerged since the practice guidelines were crafted and adopted? Provide two examples that support your assessment.
Required Readings
White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terharr, M. F. (2016).
Translation of evidence into nursing and health care practice
(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Chapter 1, “Evidence-Based Practice”
Chapter 2, “The Science of Translation and Major Frameworks”
Terry, A. J. (2018).
Clinical research for the doctor of nursing practice
(3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Pages 15-18, “The Process of Translating Evidence Into Clinical Practice”
Chapter 3, “Conducting a Literature Review”
Djulbergovic, B. (2014). A framework to bridge the gaps between evidence-based medicine, health outcomes, and improvement and implementation science.
Journal of Oncology Practice
, 10(3), 200-202.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Fineout-Overhold, E., Melnyk, B.M., Stillwell, S.B., & Williamson, K.M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step-by-step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part 1.
American Journal o ...
Janet Schnall's presentation about Evidence Based Nursing Resources at our free monthly webcast. Recording available at https://webmeeting.nih.gov/p96958659/
NER Public Health Digital Library ProjectElaine Martin
The New England Region's Public Health Digital Library Project was presented by Elaine Martin, DA, and Karen Dahlen. The project aims to build a digital public health library that will help make information resources, such as full-text journal articles, evidence-based guidelines, and systematic reviews available to public health professionals in all 50 U.S. states.
Course Project Part 1—Identifying a Researchable ProblemOne of th.docxmercylittle80626
Course Project: Part 1—Identifying a Researchable Problem
One of the most challenging aspects of EBP is to actually identify the answerable question.
—Karen Sue Davies
Formulating a question that targets the goal of your research is a challenging but essential task. The question plays a crucial role in all other aspects of the research, including the determination of the research design and theoretical perspective to be applied, which data will be collected, and which tools will be used for analysis. It is therefore essential to take the time to ensure that the research question addresses what you actually want to study. Doing so will increase your likelihood of obtaining meaningful results.
In this first component of the Course Project, you formulate questions to address a particular nursing issue or problem. You use the PICOT model—patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome—outlined in the Learning Resources to design your questions.
To prepare:
Review the article, “Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the Frameworks,” found in the Learning Resources for this week. Focus on the PICOT model for guiding the development of research questions.
Review the section beginning on page 71 of the course text, titled, “Developing and Refining Research Problems” in the course text, which focuses on analyzing the feasibility of a research problem.
Reflect on an issue or problem that you have noticed in your nursing practice. Consider the significance of this issue or problem.
Generate at least five questions that relate to the issue which you have identified. Use the criteria in your course text to select one question that would be most appropriate in terms of significance, feasibility, and interest. Be prepared to explain your rationale.
Formulate a preliminary PICO question—one that is answerable—based on your analysis. What are the PICO variables (patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome) for this question?
Note: Not all of these variables may be appropriate to every question. Be sure to analyze which are and are not relevant to your specific question.
Using the PICOT variables that you determined for your question, develop a list of at least 10 keywords that could be used when conducting a literature search to investigate current research pertaining to the question.
To complete:
Write a 3- to 4-page paper that includes the following:
A summary of your area of interest, an identification of the problem that you have selected, and an explanation of the significance of this problem for nursing practice
The 5 questions you have generated and a description of how you analyzed them for feasibility
Your preliminary PICOT question and a description of each PICOT variable relevant to your question
At least 10 possible keywords that could be used when conducting a literature search for your PICOT question and a rationale for your selections
Reference:
Davies, K. S. (2011). Formula.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
1. WEEK4 RESPONSE 6052
Juliet Anyanwu RE: Discussion – Week 4COLLAPSEHealthcare professionals use PICOT
questions to clear clinical issues in a way that assists to efficiently and quickly find the right
information to answer the clinical question (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). The
purpose of the PICOT question is to direct the systematic search of healthcare databases to
find the best available evidence to answer the question (Melnyk & Fine-out-Overholt, 2018).
Understanding how to appropriately formulate a clinical question in PICOT format and
using it systematically in your search is vital to efficiently begin the EBP process (Melnyk &
Fine-out-Overholt, 2018). Systematically formulating a clinical question makes it possible to
find an answer faster and proficiently, leading to enhanced methods and patient outcomes
(Stillwell et al., 2010). Question– In geriatric inpatients, does hand hygiene using soap and
water compared to the use of hand sanitizers help in lessening the occurrences of Hospital
Acquired Infection within three months?PICOT QuestionIn geriatric inpatients (P), does
hand hygiene using soap and water (I) compared to the use of hand sanitizers(C), help in
lessening of Hospital Acquired Infection (HAIs) incidences (O) within three months
(T)?Search Terms usedThe search terms used were: Hand Hygiene, hand washing, Hospital-
acquired infections, inpatient geriatrics, and hand sanitizers.Database usedThe two
databases used were CINAHL Plus with Full Text and MEDLINE with Full Text. Search
ResultsCINAHL Plus with Full Text produced 120 results, while MEDLINE with Full Text,
which had 80 (Walden University Library, n.d. – a). These presented both original research
articles and systematic reviews. The search was restricted to articles within five years. Also,
to conduct the search, the article towards the research question was used. It was all related
to hand hygiene, hand washing, hand sanitizers, and hospital-acquired infections
management. Two articles were from original research.Addition of Boolean OperatorAdding
the search terms using the Boolean operators changed my search significantly. The amounts
of records returned were remarkably decreased and increased on the articles available
based on their significance to my study. It expedited the accomplishment of more detailed
results and helped save time as the results became more suitable for my desires. It also gets
rid of unsuitable articles. Boolean operators and nesting help one search for combinations
of words or phrases processed in a particular order (Library of Congress, n.d.).Strategies to
increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search and exampleThe strategies I will
make to increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search for my PICOT question
include: Using Boolean operators. The use of Boolean operators helps facilitates, confines
the search to the most relevant results, and is more focused. I will also limit the search to a
2. particular year range. Limiting the year range, this helps in returning current searches and
also uses more than one database for my search, because everyone may have more articles.
I will seek the help of a Librarian to assist me in the preliminary inquiry. Another strategy is
using parentheses. The use of Parentheses will help me get the search I
want.ReferencesLibrary of Congress. (n.d.). Search/browse help-Boolean Operator and
nesting. Retrieved September 22, 2020, from
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/ui/en_US/htdocs/help/searchBoolean.htmlMelnyk, B. M., &
Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare (4th ed.).
Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk,
B. M., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: asking the clinical
question: a key step in evidence-based practice. AJN The American Journal of
Nursing, 110(3), 58-61.Walden University Library (n.d.-a). Databases A-Z. Retrieved
September 22, 2020, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981Angel
Brockington-Hall RE: Discussion – Week 4: Main PostCOLLAPSEAfter reviewing the five
types of foreground questions, it was determined that a meaning question would be the
most suitable approach for posing a question using PICOT. According to Melnyk and
Fineout-Overholt (2018), meaning questions explore the relationship between an
experience and an outcome, the extent or range of a rare occurrence, or “the influence of
culture on healthcare” (p. 39).PICOT ComponentDescriptionPatient populationSexual
assault survivorsIntervention/issue of interestOngoing treatment and support/cultivating
community support cultureComparison intervention/issue of interestChallenging
traditional beliefs and attitudes with awareness and educationOutcomeIncreased rates of
reporting and support networksTimePost-assault through three monthsPICOT
QuestionWhat is the quality of life (O) for sexual assault survivors (P) who report the
incident and receive treatment and ongoing community support (I) within the first three
months (T), compared to their counterparts who choose not to report (C) their lived
experience?Search Terms Used and Databases Used for PICOT QuestionThe search terms
used included sexual assault victims or sexual assault survivors, rape and quality of life,
community support, and treatment, contributing factors, reporting sexual assault, sexual
assault, coping behavior, and trauma. Boolean operators and nesting were applied to
“search for combinations of words or phrases processed in a specified order” (Library of
Congress, n.d.), and expanders such as “apply related words” and “search with the full text
of the articles” were applied to refine results. CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE with
Full Text, APA PsycINFO, and APA PsycArticles were databases used to research the PICOT
question. The American Psychological Association (APA) publishes articles available in the
APA PsycArticles and APA PsycINFO databases. According to Walden University Library
(n.d.), both databases are “a definitive source of full text, peer-reviewed scholarly and
scientific articles in psychology” (para. 1). CINHAL Plus, with full text, offers “a robust
collection of full-text nursing and allied health journals” (Walden University Library, n.d.,
para. 1). It provides and permits access to nearly 800 journals indexed in the original
CINAHL database. According to Walden University Library (n.d.), “CINAHL Plus with Full
Text is the core research tool for all areas of nursing and allied health literature” (para.
1). Similarly, Medline with Full text presents “the authoritative medical information” on
3. various health professions, including nursing. Nearly 1,500 journals are indexed in
MEDLINE, which offers full text (Walden University Library, n.d., para. 1).Search Results and
Changes Noted with Boolean Operators Walden University’s Library “Database search
skills: Set up your search” option encourages the use of one term when searching databases
to return the best and broadest results. Entering a single word can be used to determine
whether the precise term aligns with “scholarly works” (Walden University Library,
Database search skills: Set up your search, n.d.-b.). Applying this recommendation produced
over 20,000 articles. Limiters such as peer-reviewed scholarly journals and a publication
date no older than 2015 were used, resulting in the following results:MEDLINE with Full
Text (151)CINAHL Plus with Full Text (120)APA PsycArticles (35)APA PsycInfo
(6) Without the Boolean search operators and, or, and not, a search for sexual assault
survivors returned a total of 1,039 results. The number of original research articles
returned within the APA PsycINFO database was five out of six, proving a high probability of
finding trustworthy, scholarly, current, and original research applied to the PICOT
question. When the Boolean search operator AND was used to include reporting sexual
assault, collectively, all four databases were reduced to five total search results. Search
results increased exponentially, when an additional field of the Boolean operator OR was
employed. In the second field of the database search, the terms beliefs or perceptions or
views or attitudes were added. Including the Boolean connector OR, produced greater than
400,125 results. However, the articles resulting from adding OR produced fewer articles
germane to the PICOT question. Strategies to Increase Rigor and Effectiveness of Database
Search for PICOTSome strategies could be applied to databases that make searching a
PICOT question more efficient and rigorous. These strategies include: Ensuring databases
are reliable and produce trustworthy content rooted in scholarly work.Apply best practices
in the methodological review of data.Utilize a combination of sources to establish
evidenceOrganize citations and search strategies (Hartzell & Fineout-Overholt, 2018, p.
57).Solicit help from the librarian when needed.Select articles most germane to the PICOT
question (Hartzell & Fineout-Overholt, 2018, p. 57).According to Hartzell and Fineout-
Overholt (2018), the above represent “basic and advanced behaviors that clinicians would
use to competently search bibliographic databases such as the Cumulative Index to Nursing
and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and MEDLINE” (p. 56). Searching databases that
have relevancy to a PICOT question facilitates the evidence searching and gleaning
process. Boolean operators serve as “connectors” which can be used to expand (using OR)
or narrow (using AND) searches. Overall, there are standard competencies expected of
advanced practice clinicians, and there are various resources available to facilitate and
promote honing these critical skills.ReferencesHartzell, T. A. & Fineout-Overholt, E.
(2018). Chapter 3: Finding relevant evidence to answer clinical questions. In B. M. Melnyk,
B. M., & E. Fineout-Overholt (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide
to best practice (pp. 607-653). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.Library of Congress. (n.d.).
Search/browse help – Boolean operators and nesting.
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/ui/en_US/htdocs/help/searchBoolean.htmlMelnyk, B. M., &
Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide
to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.Walden University Library.
4. (n.d.-a). Databases A-Z: Nursing.
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981Walden University Library. (n.d.-b).
Database search skills: Set up your search.
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/databasesearchskills/setupyoursearch3SOU
RCES FOR EACH DISCUSSION