course material

1. Walden NURS 6052 Week 5 Discussion
Walden NURS 6052 Week 5 DiscussionORDER HERE FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE
PAPERS ON Walden NURS 6052 Week 5 Discussion Am sending the attachments for the
instructions to follow. Tutor must an expert in MSN in Acute APRN program topics.WEEK 5
NURS Essent of Evidence- Based Practice ASSIGNMENTModule 3: Advanced Clinical Inquiry
and PICO(T) Questions (Weeks 4-5)Learning ObjectivesStudents will:Create an answerable
research question using the PICO(T) question formatApply effective search strategies to
identify relevant peer-reviewed and systematic reviewed researchAnalyze strategies to
increase rigor and effectiveness of database searches for PICO(T) questionsAnalyze levels of
evidence in peer-reviewed researchAssignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 2: Advanced
Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic ReviewsYour quest to purchase a new car begins
with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that
rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that
evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is
encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected,
and what was the sample size?In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry
by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you
have collected.To Prepare:Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that
can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical
issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will
remain the same for the entire course.Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you
developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at
least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes
meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised
individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the
elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find
the best evidence available.Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and
searching for peer-reviewed research.The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)Part 2:
Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic ReviewsCreate a 6- to 7-slide
PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:Identify and briefly describe your
chosen clinical issue of interest.Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on
your chosen clinical issue of interest.Identify the four research databases that you used to
conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.Provide APA citations of the
four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your

2. research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your
topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.Describe the levels of
evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of
the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide
examples.Learning ResourcesNote: To access this module’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of
your Syllabus.Required ReadingsMelnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-
based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA:
Wolters Kluwer.Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 33–54)Chapter 3,
“Finding Relevant Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions” (pp. 55–92) Davies, K. S. (2011).
Formulating the evidence based practice question: A review of the frameworks for LIS
professionals. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 6(2), 75–80.
https://doi.org/10.18438/B8WS5NNote: You will access this article from the Walden
Library databases.Library of Congress. (n.d.). Search/browse help – Boolean operators and
nesting. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/ui/en_US/htdocs/help/searchBoolean.html Stillwell, S. B.,
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Williamson, K. M. (2010a). Evidence-based practice,
step by step: Asking the clinical question: A key step in evidence-based practice. American
Journal of Nursing, 110(3), 58–61. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000368959.11129.79Note: You
will access this article from the Walden Library databases. Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt,
E., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Step by step: Igniting
a spirit of inquiry. American Journal of Nursing, 109(11), 49–52.
doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000363354.53883.58Note: You will access this article from the
Walden Library databases. Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Williamson,
K. M. (2010b). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Searching for the evidence. American
Journal of Nursing, 110(5), 41–47. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000372071.24134.7eNote: You
will access this article from the Walden Library databases.Walden University Library. (n.d.-
a). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981Walden University Library. (n.d.-c).
Evidence-based practice research: CINAHL search help. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/cinahlsearchhelpWalden
University Library. (n.d.-d). Evidence-based practice research: Joanna Briggs Institute
search help. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/jbisearchhelpWalden
University Library. (n.d.-e). Evidence-based practice research: MEDLINE search help.
Retrieved September 6, 2019, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/medlinesearchhelpWalden
University Library. (n.d.-f). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Boolean
terms. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/booleanWalden University Library.
(n.d.-g). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Introduction to keyword
searching. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/searching-basics Walden University

3. Library. (n.d.-h). Quick Answers: How do I find a systematic review article related to health,
medicine, or nursing? Retrieved September 6, 2019, from
https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72670Walden University Library. (n.d.-i).
Systematic review. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/types#s-lg-box-
1520654Required MediaLaureate Education (Producer). (2018). Searching the Evidence
[Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.Rubric Detail Excellent Fair
PoorPart 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6-
to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly
describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T)
question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research
databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
· Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels
of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation
of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide
examples. 81 (81%) – 90 (90%)The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and
describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest.The presentation clearly and
accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question.The presentation clearly and
accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-
reviewed articles selected.The presentation clearly and accurately provides full APA
citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including a thorough and detailed
explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Walden NURS
6052 Week 5 DiscussionThe presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully
support the research.The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate
synthesis of two outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully
integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that
fully support the presentation. 63 (63%) – 71 (71%)The presentation inaccurately
or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest.The presentation
inaccurately or vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) question focused on the chosen
clinical issue of interest.The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies at least four
research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected.The
presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed
articles selected, including an inaccurate or vague explanation of the strengths of using
systematic reviews for clinical research.The presentation includes inaccurate or vague
examples to support the research presented.The presentation provides a vague or
inaccurate synthesis or outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected. The
response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. 0 (0%) –
62 (62%)The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen
clinical issue of interest or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes
the developed PICO(T) question, or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely
identifies less than four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed
articles selected or is missing.The presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides APA
citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected, including an inaccurate and vague

4. explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research, or is
missing.The presentation includes inaccurate and vague examples to support the research
presented or is missing.The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no
outside resources related to the articles selected and fails to integrate any resources to
support the presentation or is missing.Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph
Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—
neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive
purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and
conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria. 3.5 (3.5%) –
3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and
clarity 60–79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague
or off topic. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion
are provided.Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct
grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct
grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 3.5 (3.5%) –
3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation
errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6052_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric
Walden NURS 6052 Week 5 Discussion