Week 3
Dr. Russell Rodrigo
Kantian
Ethics
1
Deontology or Kantian Ethics
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
German philosopher
 non-consequentialist
Did not believe that looking at the consequences of
an action was how to decide whether it was wrong or
right
Kantfocuses onmotives, rules andthe way
we treat people.
DEONTOLOGY: An EthicsOf Rights
And Duties
Supplements the
utilitarian approach.
We oughttofollow rules even if doingso
preventsgoodconsequences fromhappeningor
even if it results in some badconsequences.
Principle-based
• What rules should we follow?
Legal rules
Institutional Rules
Role-based rules (Business)
Professional rules
DEONTOLOGY
These rules are gatekeepers that ensure integrity
and proper functioningof economic, legal or
financial system
Immanuel Kant:
“Respect the dignity of each individual human being.”
Human Rights And Duties
Act according to those rules that could
be universally agreed to by all people.
Treat each person as end in
themselves and never only as means to
our own ends.
How?
Fundamental human rights are derived fromour
nature as free and rational beings:
Kantian Tradition
How they live their lives.
Their own ends.
Humans are said to have a fundamental human right of
autonomy, or self-rule.
Since all humans possess this fundamental characteristic, equal
treatment and equal consideration is also a fundamental right.
Human Rights And Duties
Autonomy
or
Self-rule
human nature
freedom to make our
own choices deserves
special protection as a
basic right.
DistinguishingBetween Moral Rights
And Legal Rights
• granted on the basis of legislation or
judicial rulings.
• arise from contractual agreements.
• One cannot contract away one’s moral rights -
moral rights lie outside of the bargaining that
occurs in a contract.
• Establish the basic moral framework for legal
environment itself, and more specifically for
any contracts that are negotiated within
business.
Legal rights
Moral Rights
Let’s look atwhatthis means…
How do we decide what is right?
 Look at the intentions behind any act to see whether it was right or wrong.
Whydoconsequences notcount?
 The consequences of actions couldn’t be used to decide what was
right because consequences were not totally within our control.
 Being moral was something we did as rational human beings and was
something which applied equally to all such rational beings.
Right Intentions RightActions
Think about a man who saves another from drowning and the
man he saves then goes and kills his family. If we were just
looking at the consequences – the first man could be said to
have done something wrong, not right.
If consequences don’t count what does?
For Kant, the only way to decide what is right is to look at
why you are doing it. Kant says that the only reason which
counts as a moral one is to act out of duty.
What does this mean?
Actingout of duty is actingonly because you know that it
is the right thingto do, not fromany other
motive.
WhyDuty?
Think about the different natures people have.
Kind
nature
Unkind nature
It follows then that if what was right and wrong was decided by lookingat
whether people acted out of kindness, some people would find itmuch easier
than others would. They would bemore inclined to be kind.
Thismeans that beingmoral would be a lot easier for some.
The Categorical Imperative
- a command, like ‘Go to your class’ or ‘Keep
your promises’.
There are 2main ways in whichthe categorical imperative is
stated.
UniversalMoral law
You should only do things, which it would make sense to
apply to everyone.
You should only do things that you would make a
moral law for everyone.
Treating People as ends notmeans.
The idea here is that you should not use people to suit
your own purposes. You should make sure that you are
treating them as individuals who have their own lives to
lead and deserve respect.
Sowhatdoyouthinkof Kantian Ethics? Is it agood
waytodecide whatis rightand wrong?
Strengths:
 No problem of consequences
 Motives matter
 We should act out of duty not just do what we want
 Justice matters
Are consequences totally irrelevant?
Is duty the only correct motive?
What happens when duties conflict?
Weaknesses
EXERCISE
Euthanasia
Terminally ill BrittanyMaynard chooses
to end her life.
Definition and handout distributed
Jim’s Story
Jim was lying in a hospital bed, suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. His brain cells had
seriously deteriorated and he was unable to speak or care for himself. He was being kept
alive by food and water being fed through a tube into his nose and stomach. Jim was a
retired army officer who had fought in the Second World War. He was now 75 and his
family accepted that his death was only a matter of time. Jim had contracted Alzheimer’s
not long after he had retired and he knew that it would cause helplessness and
eventually his death. Well before it got to this stage, Jim had written a letter to his doctor
saying that he wanted the doctor to put him to sleep forever, if he got to a stage of total
helplessness and dependence on others.
Given the legal position, however, the doctor could not carry this out.
Jim’s younger brother, Sam, another retired army officer visited regularly. There was only
3 years age difference and the brothers had always been very close. One day Jim, was
very distressed and kept making mouth movements as if he was trying to say something.
A few minutes later, Sam went to his car and came back with his pistol. When Jim saw
this, he nodded. Sam fired 3 shots through his brother’s head and another into his
stomach. Calmly he put the gun down and waited for the police to arrive.
The greatest happiness principle and the issue of euthanasia.
Utilitarians will look at the short term and long term
consequences of allowing euthanasia.
Rule Utilitarians would look for rules to cover euthanasia as a
whole.
The Categorical Imperative and the Issue of Euthanasia –
Arguments AGAINST Euthanasia
Universalisation.
The Kantian only accepts as moral laws, those which can be
universalised i.e. it makes sense to apply to everyone.
Treating people as ends not means.
The Kantian says the only situations which are moral are those which allows
people to act as rational human beings. They have to be respected and
valued.
Virtue Ethics is a tradition within philosophical ethics
that seeks a full anddetaileddescription of those
character traits, orvirtues, that would constitute a
good and full human life.
VIRTUE ETHICS:
MakingDecisionsBasedOn Integrity
And Character
VIRTUE ETHICS
What a person should do Who that person is
The side of our character.
VIRTUE ETHICS
Greek philosopher
Socrates was a pioneer in
virtue-ethical thinking.
enotes.com
What does it do to us?
Understands how our traits are formed and
which traits bolster and which undermine a
meaningful, worthwhile, and satisfying human
life.
Reminds us to examine how character traits are
formed and conditioned.
30
Virtue Ethics: Robert Solomon
• Ability Being dependable and competent
• AcceptanceMakingthe best of a bad situation
• Amiability Fostering agreeable social contexts
• Articulateness Ability tomake and defend one’s case
• Attentiveness Listening and understanding
• Autonomy Having a personal identity
• Caring Worrying about the well-being of others
despite power
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or
duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
31
Virtue Ethics (Cont’d)
• Charisma Inspiring others
• Compassion Sympathetic
• Cool headedness Retaining control and reasonableness in
heated situations
• Courage Doing the right thing despite the cost
• Determination Seeing a task through to completion
• Fairness Giving others their due; creating harmony
• Generosity Sharing, enhancing others’ well-being
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or
duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
32
Virtue Ethics (Cont’d)
• Graciousness Establishing a congenial environment
• Gratitude Giving proper credit
• Heroism Doing the right thing despite the
consequences
• Honesty Telling the truth; not lying
• Humility Giving proper credit
• Humor Bring relief; making the world better
• Independence Getting things done despite bureaucracy
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated,
or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
33
Virtue Ethics (Cont’d)
• Integrity Being a model of trustworthiness
• Justice Treating others fairly
• Loyalty Working for the well-being of an organization
• Pride Being admired by others
• Prudence Minimizing company and personal losses
• Responsibility Doing what it takes to do the right thing
• Saintliness Approaching the ideal in behavior
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or
duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
34
Virtue Ethics (Cont’d)
• Shame (capable of) Regaining acceptance after wrong behavior
• Spirit Appreciating a larger picture in situations
• Toughness Maintaining one’s position
• Trust Dependable
• Trustworthiness Fulfilling one’s responsibilities
• Wittiness Lightening the conversation when
warranted
• Zeal Getting the job done right; enthusiasm
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned,
copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole
or in part.
What would you do? Singlemother of
4 children can’t afford food.

Week 3 deontology, virtue ethics

  • 1.
    Week 3 Dr. RussellRodrigo Kantian Ethics 1
  • 2.
    Deontology or KantianEthics Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher  non-consequentialist Did not believe that looking at the consequences of an action was how to decide whether it was wrong or right Kantfocuses onmotives, rules andthe way we treat people.
  • 3.
    DEONTOLOGY: An EthicsOfRights And Duties Supplements the utilitarian approach. We oughttofollow rules even if doingso preventsgoodconsequences fromhappeningor even if it results in some badconsequences. Principle-based
  • 4.
    • What rulesshould we follow? Legal rules Institutional Rules Role-based rules (Business) Professional rules DEONTOLOGY These rules are gatekeepers that ensure integrity and proper functioningof economic, legal or financial system
  • 5.
    Immanuel Kant: “Respect thedignity of each individual human being.” Human Rights And Duties Act according to those rules that could be universally agreed to by all people. Treat each person as end in themselves and never only as means to our own ends. How?
  • 6.
    Fundamental human rightsare derived fromour nature as free and rational beings: Kantian Tradition How they live their lives. Their own ends. Humans are said to have a fundamental human right of autonomy, or self-rule.
  • 7.
    Since all humanspossess this fundamental characteristic, equal treatment and equal consideration is also a fundamental right. Human Rights And Duties Autonomy or Self-rule human nature freedom to make our own choices deserves special protection as a basic right.
  • 8.
    DistinguishingBetween Moral Rights AndLegal Rights • granted on the basis of legislation or judicial rulings. • arise from contractual agreements. • One cannot contract away one’s moral rights - moral rights lie outside of the bargaining that occurs in a contract. • Establish the basic moral framework for legal environment itself, and more specifically for any contracts that are negotiated within business. Legal rights Moral Rights
  • 9.
    Let’s look atwhatthismeans… How do we decide what is right?  Look at the intentions behind any act to see whether it was right or wrong. Whydoconsequences notcount?  The consequences of actions couldn’t be used to decide what was right because consequences were not totally within our control.  Being moral was something we did as rational human beings and was something which applied equally to all such rational beings. Right Intentions RightActions
  • 10.
    Think about aman who saves another from drowning and the man he saves then goes and kills his family. If we were just looking at the consequences – the first man could be said to have done something wrong, not right.
  • 11.
    If consequences don’tcount what does? For Kant, the only way to decide what is right is to look at why you are doing it. Kant says that the only reason which counts as a moral one is to act out of duty. What does this mean? Actingout of duty is actingonly because you know that it is the right thingto do, not fromany other motive.
  • 12.
    WhyDuty? Think about thedifferent natures people have. Kind nature Unkind nature It follows then that if what was right and wrong was decided by lookingat whether people acted out of kindness, some people would find itmuch easier than others would. They would bemore inclined to be kind. Thismeans that beingmoral would be a lot easier for some.
  • 13.
    The Categorical Imperative -a command, like ‘Go to your class’ or ‘Keep your promises’. There are 2main ways in whichthe categorical imperative is stated.
  • 14.
    UniversalMoral law You shouldonly do things, which it would make sense to apply to everyone. You should only do things that you would make a moral law for everyone.
  • 15.
    Treating People asends notmeans. The idea here is that you should not use people to suit your own purposes. You should make sure that you are treating them as individuals who have their own lives to lead and deserve respect.
  • 18.
    Sowhatdoyouthinkof Kantian Ethics?Is it agood waytodecide whatis rightand wrong? Strengths:  No problem of consequences  Motives matter  We should act out of duty not just do what we want  Justice matters
  • 19.
    Are consequences totallyirrelevant? Is duty the only correct motive? What happens when duties conflict? Weaknesses
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Terminally ill BrittanyMaynardchooses to end her life.
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Jim’s Story Jim waslying in a hospital bed, suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. His brain cells had seriously deteriorated and he was unable to speak or care for himself. He was being kept alive by food and water being fed through a tube into his nose and stomach. Jim was a retired army officer who had fought in the Second World War. He was now 75 and his family accepted that his death was only a matter of time. Jim had contracted Alzheimer’s not long after he had retired and he knew that it would cause helplessness and eventually his death. Well before it got to this stage, Jim had written a letter to his doctor saying that he wanted the doctor to put him to sleep forever, if he got to a stage of total helplessness and dependence on others. Given the legal position, however, the doctor could not carry this out. Jim’s younger brother, Sam, another retired army officer visited regularly. There was only 3 years age difference and the brothers had always been very close. One day Jim, was very distressed and kept making mouth movements as if he was trying to say something. A few minutes later, Sam went to his car and came back with his pistol. When Jim saw this, he nodded. Sam fired 3 shots through his brother’s head and another into his stomach. Calmly he put the gun down and waited for the police to arrive.
  • 25.
    The greatest happinessprinciple and the issue of euthanasia. Utilitarians will look at the short term and long term consequences of allowing euthanasia. Rule Utilitarians would look for rules to cover euthanasia as a whole.
  • 26.
    The Categorical Imperativeand the Issue of Euthanasia – Arguments AGAINST Euthanasia Universalisation. The Kantian only accepts as moral laws, those which can be universalised i.e. it makes sense to apply to everyone. Treating people as ends not means. The Kantian says the only situations which are moral are those which allows people to act as rational human beings. They have to be respected and valued.
  • 27.
    Virtue Ethics isa tradition within philosophical ethics that seeks a full anddetaileddescription of those character traits, orvirtues, that would constitute a good and full human life. VIRTUE ETHICS: MakingDecisionsBasedOn Integrity And Character
  • 28.
    VIRTUE ETHICS What aperson should do Who that person is The side of our character.
  • 29.
    VIRTUE ETHICS Greek philosopher Socrateswas a pioneer in virtue-ethical thinking. enotes.com What does it do to us? Understands how our traits are formed and which traits bolster and which undermine a meaningful, worthwhile, and satisfying human life. Reminds us to examine how character traits are formed and conditioned.
  • 30.
    30 Virtue Ethics: RobertSolomon • Ability Being dependable and competent • AcceptanceMakingthe best of a bad situation • Amiability Fostering agreeable social contexts • Articulateness Ability tomake and defend one’s case • Attentiveness Listening and understanding • Autonomy Having a personal identity • Caring Worrying about the well-being of others despite power © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
  • 31.
    31 Virtue Ethics (Cont’d) •Charisma Inspiring others • Compassion Sympathetic • Cool headedness Retaining control and reasonableness in heated situations • Courage Doing the right thing despite the cost • Determination Seeing a task through to completion • Fairness Giving others their due; creating harmony • Generosity Sharing, enhancing others’ well-being © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
  • 32.
    32 Virtue Ethics (Cont’d) •Graciousness Establishing a congenial environment • Gratitude Giving proper credit • Heroism Doing the right thing despite the consequences • Honesty Telling the truth; not lying • Humility Giving proper credit • Humor Bring relief; making the world better • Independence Getting things done despite bureaucracy © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
  • 33.
    33 Virtue Ethics (Cont’d) •Integrity Being a model of trustworthiness • Justice Treating others fairly • Loyalty Working for the well-being of an organization • Pride Being admired by others • Prudence Minimizing company and personal losses • Responsibility Doing what it takes to do the right thing • Saintliness Approaching the ideal in behavior © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
  • 34.
    34 Virtue Ethics (Cont’d) •Shame (capable of) Regaining acceptance after wrong behavior • Spirit Appreciating a larger picture in situations • Toughness Maintaining one’s position • Trust Dependable • Trustworthiness Fulfilling one’s responsibilities • Wittiness Lightening the conversation when warranted • Zeal Getting the job done right; enthusiasm © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
  • 35.
    What would youdo? Singlemother of 4 children can’t afford food.