Web Site Evaluation
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•214 views
A basic overview of evaluating web resources with built in discussion and examples of unreliable websites.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![For Fun and Games and Pretty Pictures the web is fine….. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Helping kids learn through research
This document provides guidance for parents on helping their children with research. It discusses different types of resources available for research, including print, electronic, and primary sources. It also covers how to evaluate the reliability of websites and emphasizes the importance of teaching children to properly cite their sources and use information ethically from a young age.
Website evaluation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility of websites and online sources of information. It identifies important attributes to consider, such as the domain extension (.com, .edu, etc.), author credentials, date of publication/last update, presence of errors, purpose and structure. Less credible sources are more likely to contain advertising, dead links or poor organization. Government, educational and non-profit sites (.gov, .edu, .org) can generally be considered more trustworthy than commercial sites.
Evaluating a website
The document discusses the importance of evaluating websites before using them for schoolwork or other purposes. It recommends using the REAL strategy to evaluate websites, which involves reading the URL, examining the content, asking about the author and publisher, and looking at the links on the page. Evaluating websites using this strategy helps determine if a site is reputable and worth using or is a waste of time.
Radcab
This document provides guidance on evaluating information found online using the RADCAB criteria: Relevancy, Appropriateness, Detail, Currency, Authority, and Bias. It explains each criterion and provides clues to look for that indicate whether a source meets that standard. For example, under Authority it notes that good authorship means the author's credentials can be found, and under Bias it lists clues like an organization's mission statement, domain suffix, author background, advertising, and language used. The document aims to help readers determine if online information is reliable and suitable to use.
Helping kids learn_through_research[1]
This document provides guidance for parents on helping their children with research. It discusses what research is, available resources for research including print, electronic and primary sources. It also covers differences between websites and online databases, kid-friendly search engines to start with, how to evaluate if a website is reliable, and tips for parents such as encouraging notetaking and sitting together during research.
Internet Research for Elementary Students
This document provides guidance on how to effectively research topics online for school assignments. It recommends starting with a kid-friendly search engine to avoid inappropriate content. Keywords and search terms are important for retrieving relevant information, as using multiple keywords together will yield fewer but more targeted results. When evaluating websites for research, it is important to consider the credentials and expertise of the creator, the type and recency of information on the site, and how authoritative and trustworthy the site seems. Students are instructed to use an evaluation form to systematically rate potential research websites.
375643 634074779366488750
This document introduces the CRAAP test for evaluating information sources. The CRAAP test consists of 5 criteria - Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Each criterion is explained in 1-2 sentences. Currency refers to how up-to-date the information is. Relevance means how effectively the source communicates information to its intended audience. Authority evaluates the author's credentials and expertise. Accuracy examines the reliability and verifiability of the content. Purpose determines why the source was created and any potential biases. The document provides examples and guidelines for applying each aspect of the CRAAP test.
Evaluating websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating online information sources and websites. It discusses evaluating electronic information for accuracy, relevance, appropriateness, comprehensiveness, and bias. It also discusses evaluating new information resources and technological innovations based on their appropriateness for specific tasks. Key factors for evaluating websites discussed include considering who authored the site, what the purpose and potential biases are, when it was created and last updated, where the information comes from, and why the information would be useful. A checklist of "5 W" questions is provided to systematically evaluate websites.
Recommended
Helping kids learn through research
This document provides guidance for parents on helping their children with research. It discusses different types of resources available for research, including print, electronic, and primary sources. It also covers how to evaluate the reliability of websites and emphasizes the importance of teaching children to properly cite their sources and use information ethically from a young age.
Website evaluation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility of websites and online sources of information. It identifies important attributes to consider, such as the domain extension (.com, .edu, etc.), author credentials, date of publication/last update, presence of errors, purpose and structure. Less credible sources are more likely to contain advertising, dead links or poor organization. Government, educational and non-profit sites (.gov, .edu, .org) can generally be considered more trustworthy than commercial sites.
Evaluating a website
The document discusses the importance of evaluating websites before using them for schoolwork or other purposes. It recommends using the REAL strategy to evaluate websites, which involves reading the URL, examining the content, asking about the author and publisher, and looking at the links on the page. Evaluating websites using this strategy helps determine if a site is reputable and worth using or is a waste of time.
Radcab
This document provides guidance on evaluating information found online using the RADCAB criteria: Relevancy, Appropriateness, Detail, Currency, Authority, and Bias. It explains each criterion and provides clues to look for that indicate whether a source meets that standard. For example, under Authority it notes that good authorship means the author's credentials can be found, and under Bias it lists clues like an organization's mission statement, domain suffix, author background, advertising, and language used. The document aims to help readers determine if online information is reliable and suitable to use.
Helping kids learn_through_research[1]
This document provides guidance for parents on helping their children with research. It discusses what research is, available resources for research including print, electronic and primary sources. It also covers differences between websites and online databases, kid-friendly search engines to start with, how to evaluate if a website is reliable, and tips for parents such as encouraging notetaking and sitting together during research.
Internet Research for Elementary Students
This document provides guidance on how to effectively research topics online for school assignments. It recommends starting with a kid-friendly search engine to avoid inappropriate content. Keywords and search terms are important for retrieving relevant information, as using multiple keywords together will yield fewer but more targeted results. When evaluating websites for research, it is important to consider the credentials and expertise of the creator, the type and recency of information on the site, and how authoritative and trustworthy the site seems. Students are instructed to use an evaluation form to systematically rate potential research websites.
375643 634074779366488750
This document introduces the CRAAP test for evaluating information sources. The CRAAP test consists of 5 criteria - Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Each criterion is explained in 1-2 sentences. Currency refers to how up-to-date the information is. Relevance means how effectively the source communicates information to its intended audience. Authority evaluates the author's credentials and expertise. Accuracy examines the reliability and verifiability of the content. Purpose determines why the source was created and any potential biases. The document provides examples and guidelines for applying each aspect of the CRAAP test.
Evaluating websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating online information sources and websites. It discusses evaluating electronic information for accuracy, relevance, appropriateness, comprehensiveness, and bias. It also discusses evaluating new information resources and technological innovations based on their appropriateness for specific tasks. Key factors for evaluating websites discussed include considering who authored the site, what the purpose and potential biases are, when it was created and last updated, where the information comes from, and why the information would be useful. A checklist of "5 W" questions is provided to systematically evaluate websites.
Locating reliable resources
The document discusses how to evaluate the reliability of web sites and databases as research resources. It provides tips for assessing the credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and support of information on a web site using the C.A.R.S. checklist. Databases contain vetted resources but require login credentials to access from off-campus. File extensions like .edu and .gov indicate the type of organization but don't guarantee accuracy. The document advises creating citations while evaluating sources.
Evaluating Information Sources
The document discusses the importance of evaluating information sources and applying evaluation criteria. It notes that primary sources are most reliable and that when evaluating sources one needs to determine fact from opinion, potential bias, and whether the information is reliable and credible. The document emphasizes applying evaluation criteria to information sources to assess accuracy and reliability.
C.A.R.S. Method for Evaluating Internet Validity
The document outlines the C.A.R.S. method for evaluating website credibility. C.A.R.S. stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. For each category, the document provides goals and questions to consider to determine a website's credibility. Credibility focuses on the author's expertise, Accuracy examines how current and consistent the information is, Reasonableness looks at potential biases, and Support analyzes whether sources can be verified.
Evaluating digital resources may 2017
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate information found online. It introduces the CRAAP test for credibility, which examines the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of a source. Key factors to consider include the author's credentials, publication date, intended audience, evidence and citations used, potential biases, and sponsorship or affiliation. Popular search engines like Google may return many results but not always the most reliable ones. Wikipedia can be a starting point but its open editing model means information must be verified through cited sources. Overall, critical evaluation of online information is important to assess accuracy and avoid spreading misinformation.
The Craap Test for evaluating resources
Submit your resources to the respected CRAAP test to determine whether you want to use them or not for your assignment.
Website Evaluation For Learning For Life
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites as sources of information and introduces the "ABC" method for website evaluation. It teaches students that they must be "web detectives" to distinguish reliable sources from unreliable ones on the internet. It lists several criteria ("Author", "Bias", "Content", "Dates", "Editor") students should consider when assessing websites for a school assignment on creating anti-smoking ads. Several potential source websites on smoking are provided as examples to evaluate.
CRAAP Test PowerPoint
This document provides information on resources for research such as Galileo, Google, and Wikipedia and how to evaluate sources. It discusses:
- Galileo as a database paid for by taxes that searches many databases and contains academic journal articles for high school and college research.
- How to search Galileo using advanced search, clicking "Full Text", and narrowing searches.
- The CRAAP test for evaluating websites and articles based on their currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose.
- Tips for searching Google effectively such as using quotation marks for exact phrases, a minus sign to exclude words, and site operators to limit to specific sites.
Craap on the internet
The document discusses the CRAAP test for evaluating the quality and reliability of internet sources. The CRAAP test stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It provides examples of applying the CRAAP test criteria to evaluate several websites on World War 2, some passing the test and others failing. Resources for further information on applying the CRAAP evaluation method are also listed.
5 Factors for Evaluating Websites
This document outlines 5 factors for evaluating websites: authority, currency, content/purpose, audience, and structure/workability. It discusses evaluating who is responsible for the site, how current the information is, what purpose and content the site has, who the intended audience is, and how easy the site is to use.
Web page evaluation quick checklist
This document provides a quick checklist for evaluating web pages. It includes criteria for examining the URL, authority of the author, currency of information, quality/reliability of sources and content, navigation and layout, writing style, links, alternative formats, and overall purpose. The goal is to assess whether the information quality is comparable to journal articles or books so it can be used with confidence for academic purposes.
The 3As of A+ Research
The web is a great place to find information. But, how do you filter out what is worthwhile and what is questionable? Use the 3As to help you ensure you are using the best possible information.
Searching For Health Information
This document provides tips for finding trustworthy health information online. It advises evaluating the author's credentials, intended audience, accuracy supported by references, presence of bias or focus on a narrow viewpoint, currency of information including date and updated links, quality of links that support the site's claims rather than advertisements, and domain of the website. Specific trustworthy health information sites are recommended, and it cautions being wary of sites with advertisements and suggests disease associations are generally reliable sources. Search techniques like using quotation marks, limiting domains, and including or excluding words with symbols are also outlined.
Research a Career
This document provides guidance on researching careers by gathering relevant information from books, websites, and databases. It recommends identifying several key facts to explore, such as required education, skills, pay, and work locations. Reliable resources are those written by experts and kept up-to-date. Students are told to take concise notes on important words and phrases rather than copying full passages to avoid plagiarism. The document also instructs on summarizing notes in your own words using a dictionary or thesaurus, and properly citing all sources used, including titles, authors, URLs, and copyright dates.
Evaluating websites
Presentation of information from Common Sense Media on evaluating websites. Designed for middle school but will be used as refresher for high school students before a research project.
Medieval Europe Research Skills yr 8 Slideshare
This Research Skills presentation was created for Year 8 Humanities students at the Princes Hill Secondary College, by Jennifer Window, Library Manager. Topics covered include the Research Process, Information Literacy, Search using keywords and subject terms, Website evaluation, and referencing.
Steven santiago creative and practical thinking
To become a literacy volunteer, you can donate money to help programs reach their goals of educating children. You can also start your own volunteer campaign by designing it, deciding where funds will go, promoting it through social media and emails, thanking donors, and continuing momentum until the campaign is complete. Running a campaign in six easy steps through an organization like Room to Read allows individuals to support girls' education and library programs in developing countries.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for credibility and reliability to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite in a research paper. It outlines several criteria to consider, including assessing the author's credentials, accuracy and bias of the information, date of publication, documentation of sources, and purpose and intended audience of the site. Students are encouraged to think critically about the credibility of online information and not rely solely on free websites, but also use library databases and consult their teacher-librarian for source recommendations.
Evaluating information sources graphic organizer checklist fall 2014 rust
This document provides a framework for evaluating information sources based on currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. It includes criteria for assessing each category on a scale of 0 to 5, with 0 being the worst and 5 being the best. The purpose is to help students evaluate how helpful an information source may be during the research process by considering factors like timeliness, expertise of the author, reliability of content, and the intended goal of the information.
Website evaluation checklist
The document provides a checklist for evaluating websites. It includes sections for assessing the authorship and credentials, the website domain and type of extension, the purpose and content of the site, and the currency, functionality and design. The checklist is to be used to evaluate two example websites, www.dhmo.org and www.watercure.com, by indicating whether each site meets various criteria related to these sections. The goal is to determine which of the two websites is most credible based on the analysis.
Evaluating Websites For Learners
The document discusses the importance of evaluating websites for learners and provides criteria and tools that teachers can use to evaluate websites. It notes that with the amount of information on the web, evaluating websites is important to find credible sources and prevent learners from accessing inappropriate content. It then provides detailed criteria for teachers to use to evaluate websites, including evaluating the authority, content, and design of websites. Lastly, it discusses alternatives to evaluating websites like using specialized search engines designed for kids and creating a customized search engine.
Databases
This document discusses the benefits of using academic databases for research rather than general search engines or individual web pages. It notes that databases provide organized content from credible sources on all reading levels and subjects. The sources are expected to be of higher quality and more suitable for college-level work than those found through basic online searches. The document suggests databases should be used instead of only relying on sources like Google since they contain the best available sources.
How Does This Fit My Need: Improving student research processes by changing t...
1. The document discusses shifting the focus of teaching web evaluation skills from website formatting checklists to teaching critical thinking and content evaluation. Checklists focus on surface features rather than content, which is what determines a website's relevance.
2. The author proposes starting web evaluation instruction by asking questions like "What is this?", "How does it relate to my need?", and "Where does this come from?" rather than immediately asking "Can I trust it?". This helps students learn to evaluate content on their own.
3. An example quiz is provided that aims to engage students by asking questions they may not be able to answer, to break through inflated confidence levels and spark critical thinking about evaluating online information sources.
More Related Content
What's hot
Locating reliable resources
The document discusses how to evaluate the reliability of web sites and databases as research resources. It provides tips for assessing the credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and support of information on a web site using the C.A.R.S. checklist. Databases contain vetted resources but require login credentials to access from off-campus. File extensions like .edu and .gov indicate the type of organization but don't guarantee accuracy. The document advises creating citations while evaluating sources.
Evaluating Information Sources
The document discusses the importance of evaluating information sources and applying evaluation criteria. It notes that primary sources are most reliable and that when evaluating sources one needs to determine fact from opinion, potential bias, and whether the information is reliable and credible. The document emphasizes applying evaluation criteria to information sources to assess accuracy and reliability.
C.A.R.S. Method for Evaluating Internet Validity
The document outlines the C.A.R.S. method for evaluating website credibility. C.A.R.S. stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. For each category, the document provides goals and questions to consider to determine a website's credibility. Credibility focuses on the author's expertise, Accuracy examines how current and consistent the information is, Reasonableness looks at potential biases, and Support analyzes whether sources can be verified.
Evaluating digital resources may 2017
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate information found online. It introduces the CRAAP test for credibility, which examines the currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose of a source. Key factors to consider include the author's credentials, publication date, intended audience, evidence and citations used, potential biases, and sponsorship or affiliation. Popular search engines like Google may return many results but not always the most reliable ones. Wikipedia can be a starting point but its open editing model means information must be verified through cited sources. Overall, critical evaluation of online information is important to assess accuracy and avoid spreading misinformation.
The Craap Test for evaluating resources
Submit your resources to the respected CRAAP test to determine whether you want to use them or not for your assignment.
Website Evaluation For Learning For Life
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites as sources of information and introduces the "ABC" method for website evaluation. It teaches students that they must be "web detectives" to distinguish reliable sources from unreliable ones on the internet. It lists several criteria ("Author", "Bias", "Content", "Dates", "Editor") students should consider when assessing websites for a school assignment on creating anti-smoking ads. Several potential source websites on smoking are provided as examples to evaluate.
CRAAP Test PowerPoint
This document provides information on resources for research such as Galileo, Google, and Wikipedia and how to evaluate sources. It discusses:
- Galileo as a database paid for by taxes that searches many databases and contains academic journal articles for high school and college research.
- How to search Galileo using advanced search, clicking "Full Text", and narrowing searches.
- The CRAAP test for evaluating websites and articles based on their currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose.
- Tips for searching Google effectively such as using quotation marks for exact phrases, a minus sign to exclude words, and site operators to limit to specific sites.
Craap on the internet
The document discusses the CRAAP test for evaluating the quality and reliability of internet sources. The CRAAP test stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It provides examples of applying the CRAAP test criteria to evaluate several websites on World War 2, some passing the test and others failing. Resources for further information on applying the CRAAP evaluation method are also listed.
5 Factors for Evaluating Websites
This document outlines 5 factors for evaluating websites: authority, currency, content/purpose, audience, and structure/workability. It discusses evaluating who is responsible for the site, how current the information is, what purpose and content the site has, who the intended audience is, and how easy the site is to use.
Web page evaluation quick checklist
This document provides a quick checklist for evaluating web pages. It includes criteria for examining the URL, authority of the author, currency of information, quality/reliability of sources and content, navigation and layout, writing style, links, alternative formats, and overall purpose. The goal is to assess whether the information quality is comparable to journal articles or books so it can be used with confidence for academic purposes.
The 3As of A+ Research
The web is a great place to find information. But, how do you filter out what is worthwhile and what is questionable? Use the 3As to help you ensure you are using the best possible information.
Searching For Health Information
This document provides tips for finding trustworthy health information online. It advises evaluating the author's credentials, intended audience, accuracy supported by references, presence of bias or focus on a narrow viewpoint, currency of information including date and updated links, quality of links that support the site's claims rather than advertisements, and domain of the website. Specific trustworthy health information sites are recommended, and it cautions being wary of sites with advertisements and suggests disease associations are generally reliable sources. Search techniques like using quotation marks, limiting domains, and including or excluding words with symbols are also outlined.
Research a Career
This document provides guidance on researching careers by gathering relevant information from books, websites, and databases. It recommends identifying several key facts to explore, such as required education, skills, pay, and work locations. Reliable resources are those written by experts and kept up-to-date. Students are told to take concise notes on important words and phrases rather than copying full passages to avoid plagiarism. The document also instructs on summarizing notes in your own words using a dictionary or thesaurus, and properly citing all sources used, including titles, authors, URLs, and copyright dates.
Evaluating websites
Presentation of information from Common Sense Media on evaluating websites. Designed for middle school but will be used as refresher for high school students before a research project.
Medieval Europe Research Skills yr 8 Slideshare
This Research Skills presentation was created for Year 8 Humanities students at the Princes Hill Secondary College, by Jennifer Window, Library Manager. Topics covered include the Research Process, Information Literacy, Search using keywords and subject terms, Website evaluation, and referencing.
Steven santiago creative and practical thinking
To become a literacy volunteer, you can donate money to help programs reach their goals of educating children. You can also start your own volunteer campaign by designing it, deciding where funds will go, promoting it through social media and emails, thanking donors, and continuing momentum until the campaign is complete. Running a campaign in six easy steps through an organization like Room to Read allows individuals to support girls' education and library programs in developing countries.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for credibility and reliability to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite in a research paper. It outlines several criteria to consider, including assessing the author's credentials, accuracy and bias of the information, date of publication, documentation of sources, and purpose and intended audience of the site. Students are encouraged to think critically about the credibility of online information and not rely solely on free websites, but also use library databases and consult their teacher-librarian for source recommendations.
Evaluating information sources graphic organizer checklist fall 2014 rust
This document provides a framework for evaluating information sources based on currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. It includes criteria for assessing each category on a scale of 0 to 5, with 0 being the worst and 5 being the best. The purpose is to help students evaluate how helpful an information source may be during the research process by considering factors like timeliness, expertise of the author, reliability of content, and the intended goal of the information.
Website evaluation checklist
The document provides a checklist for evaluating websites. It includes sections for assessing the authorship and credentials, the website domain and type of extension, the purpose and content of the site, and the currency, functionality and design. The checklist is to be used to evaluate two example websites, www.dhmo.org and www.watercure.com, by indicating whether each site meets various criteria related to these sections. The goal is to determine which of the two websites is most credible based on the analysis.
Evaluating Websites For Learners
The document discusses the importance of evaluating websites for learners and provides criteria and tools that teachers can use to evaluate websites. It notes that with the amount of information on the web, evaluating websites is important to find credible sources and prevent learners from accessing inappropriate content. It then provides detailed criteria for teachers to use to evaluate websites, including evaluating the authority, content, and design of websites. Lastly, it discusses alternatives to evaluating websites like using specialized search engines designed for kids and creating a customized search engine.
What's hot (20)
Evaluating information sources graphic organizer checklist fall 2014 rust
Evaluating information sources graphic organizer checklist fall 2014 rust
Viewers also liked
Databases
This document discusses the benefits of using academic databases for research rather than general search engines or individual web pages. It notes that databases provide organized content from credible sources on all reading levels and subjects. The sources are expected to be of higher quality and more suitable for college-level work than those found through basic online searches. The document suggests databases should be used instead of only relying on sources like Google since they contain the best available sources.
How Does This Fit My Need: Improving student research processes by changing t...
1. The document discusses shifting the focus of teaching web evaluation skills from website formatting checklists to teaching critical thinking and content evaluation. Checklists focus on surface features rather than content, which is what determines a website's relevance.
2. The author proposes starting web evaluation instruction by asking questions like "What is this?", "How does it relate to my need?", and "Where does this come from?" rather than immediately asking "Can I trust it?". This helps students learn to evaluate content on their own.
3. An example quiz is provided that aims to engage students by asking questions they may not be able to answer, to break through inflated confidence levels and spark critical thinking about evaluating online information sources.
What Do You KNow About Dr. Seuss?
Theodor Geisel, better known as Dr. Seuss, wrote over 44 children's books in his career. Some of his most famous works included The Cat in the Hat, Green Eggs and Ham, and The Lorax, which all contained relatively small vocabularies but conveyed important messages. Before writing for children, Dr. Seuss drew political cartoons and advertisements. He found inspiration for his unique animal characters from visiting his father's zoo during his childhood. The last book published in his lifetime was Oh, the Places You'll Go in 1990, shortly before his death at age 87.
Digital Citizenship
Digital citizenship involves behaving ethically online through respecting others' privacy, presenting oneself honestly, treating people kindly without cyberbullying, and giving proper credit or permission when using others' creative works. The document outlines four key topics of online ethics: privacy, self/identity, connected culture, and respecting creative work. It provides examples of ethical online behaviors like being honest and respectful, as well as unethical behaviors like lying, misrepresenting oneself, and gossiping.
Web site evaluation
There are several criteria for evaluating websites, including authority, currency, accuracy, purpose, ease of use, and coverage. Websites should clearly indicate who authored the content and when it was last updated. The purpose of the site should also be apparent. Good websites are easy to navigate, have accurate and up-to-date information, and provide an unbiased viewpoint on their topic.
Web site evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating online sources for assignments or projects. It recommends asking who wrote the content, what their qualifications are, where they obtained their information, when it was published, and why the information is useful. Evaluating the source and validity of information found online is important to determine if a source can be trusted and the information relied upon. Users are encouraged to look at details like publication dates, author credentials, and biases to critically evaluate sources.
Bcom 275 guide 49) A claim is generally not considered credible if A. it co...
9) A claim is generally not considered credible if
A. it comes from a source assumed to be credible but who is not known to you
B. the claimant is an interested party
C. the claimant is a disinterested party
D. it seems likely
Accessing Tech at NPHS
This document provides instructions for students at North Pole High School to access various online tools and accounts using their single student login credentials. It explains how to log into the school computers, PowerSchool for grades, Google Drive, and school email by syncing the student's password with Google. It also describes how to sign the annual Responsible Technology Use Agreement in PowerSchool.
Evaluating a Web Site
The document provides guidance for students to evaluate websites. It outlines objectives for students to compile a website evaluation folder, use evaluation guidelines and forms to assess the authenticity of 5 sites selected by the teacher. Students will read an article on why websites should be evaluated and answer questions to determine the validity of pages. Evaluation criteria includes authority, objectivity, accuracy, currency and coverage. Students will identify the type of website and use checklists to determine the relative quality based on answered questions.
Viewers also liked (9)
How Does This Fit My Need: Improving student research processes by changing t...
How Does This Fit My Need: Improving student research processes by changing t...
Bcom 275 guide 49) A claim is generally not considered credible if A. it co...
Bcom 275 guide 49) A claim is generally not considered credible if A. it co...
Similar to Web Site Evaluation
Evaluating websites linear
This guide teaches students how to evaluate websites for reliability and accuracy. It discusses evaluating a website based on who created it, where it is from, why it was created, what type of content it contains, and when it was last updated. The guide provides criteria for each category and examples of evaluating sample websites about Abraham Lincoln. It emphasizes the importance of evaluation to determine if a website is trustworthy and appropriate for research.
How to Write a Research Paper, Fast!
Get your essays and research papers written from the leader in the writing industry. We have in the academic writing field since 2001. We have customers from across the world. All orders will be provided with free draft before making any payment and payment details
Locating sources review presentation
The document provides tips for locating and evaluating credible sources for research. It discusses evaluating print resources by considering the author's background and credentials. For internet sources, the document notes that anyone can post information online and advises being cautious and using evaluative skills. It provides tips for effectively using search engines and evaluating internet sources by considering the authorship, credibility, purpose, timeliness, and correlation with other research. Students are advised to carefully evaluate sources before using them.
Can you trust_the_web
The document discusses how to evaluate information found on the web through careful analysis. It provides four key steps: 1) examine the URL and publisher to determine potential biases, 2) investigate the author's credentials and expertise on the topic, 3) check the date to ensure currency, and 4) analyze the purpose and potential biases in presentation of the information. The document stresses the importance of skepticism when evaluating online sources, as there are no standards regulating information accuracy on the web like in published sources.
Online Research (2)
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider that can help determine whether a site is a good source of information or not. The document also provides some tips on using search engines like Google to investigate authors, sponsors and potential biases. It recommends additional online research resources available through the HISD library system.
Online Research
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider in determining whether a site meets that standard, such as checking for author credentials, obvious mistakes, biased or inflammatory language, dated content, and usability of navigation. The document advises using search engines like Google to investigate authors and sponsors when information is missing from sites, and provides additional tips for effective online research.
Website evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating the validity and reliability of information found on websites. It discusses why it is important to carefully examine the source and accuracy of online information. Key factors to consider include the author's credentials, date of publication, purpose of the site, potential biases, and whether other reliable sources corroborate the information. Students are given examples of trustworthy and questionable websites and instructed to practice evaluating sites using a rubric. The goal is to help students think critically about online content and distinguish factual reporting from unreliable or misleading information.
How To Do Research
The document provides guidance on different methods for conducting research. It outlines manual research using library catalogs, as well as online research strategies like database searching and internet searching. It recommends evaluating websites based on their domain extension (.edu, .gov, .org), accuracy, and frequency of updates. The document concludes by advising students to start with one reference source, obtain two books on their topic, and find two full text articles to pull their paper together. Good research skills can help students finish assignments on time.
Research Presentation
The document provides information on evaluating sources found on the internet. It discusses how Wikipedia may not be a reliable academic source due to lack of editorial oversight. It also discusses how to determine the authority, objectivity, currency and coverage of a website to evaluate if it is a good source. The document provides examples of citation styles and discusses avoiding plagiarism by properly citing sources.
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It recommends asking questions about the author's expertise, potential biases, use of evidence, and publication venue. Credible sources include well-established websites from experts in the field, as well as mainstream news sites. Government and educational websites ending in .gov and .edu require additional scrutiny. Fact-checking sites can help verify questionable information. Overall, critical evaluation of sources is important to determine what can reasonably be considered factual.
Purdue Research Power Point
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources found on the internet for research purposes. It discusses using search engines effectively, identifying the type of website and its authorship, examining the credibility of the source, determining the depth and scope of information covered, and assessing the date of the information. Key aspects to evaluate include the author's credentials, presence of references, consideration of opposing views, matching the information to the topic being researched, and whether the information is up-to-date. The document recommends corroborating internet sources with other reliable sources whenever possible.
Purdue Research And The Internet
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources found on the internet for research purposes. It emphasizes the importance of carefully examining web sources due to the lack of oversight on the internet. It offers tips for effectively using search engines, identifying the author and purpose of a site, assessing the credibility and depth of information, and determining the date of content. The overall message is that internet sources require more scrutiny than print materials.
Authentic Sources
This document discusses information literacy and evaluating sources of information. It provides guidance on selecting appropriate information sources for research, including books, encyclopedias, magazines, journals, newspapers, and websites. It also offers tips for evaluating the reliability of sources, such as considering the author's credentials, references, publisher or sponsoring institution, timeliness, intended audience, and goals or biases. Key factors that indicate high-quality sources include going through a review process, being from a reputable publisher, and providing documentation for information. The document emphasizes the importance of developing information literacy skills for the modern information society.
CCHS Grad project presentation updated2
This document provides tips and resources for students completing lower grade projects. It recommends using the local public library catalog and branches to find print materials, as well as online resources like Google Books, YouTube, and the school library catalog called Destiny. Destiny can be accessed using a student's NCWISE number and password and contains hundreds of new books on various project topics thanks to a grant. The document also recommends databases available through the school library site like InfoTrac Gold and EBSCOhost for more specialized resources. It stresses evaluating websites for authority and recent, credible information when conducting online research and provides some specific strategy and tutorial resources.
Info Literacy Presentation - Smith, D.
This document discusses how to identify reliable sources for online research. It recommends searching subject-appropriate domains like .gov, .edu, and .org, and looking at factors like the author's credentials, date written, and whether sources cite other research. Sales pages trying to persuade or sell products are less reliable than informational sites. Google Scholar is suggested for finding scholarly articles on a topic. The key is evaluating sources based on these criteria rather than just accepting the first results found.
Writing and research
This document discusses strategies for effectively researching topics in both libraries and online. It emphasizes that both libraries and the internet can provide valuable information if used properly. The library remains an important source and offers services like interlibrary loans and organized classification systems. When researching online, it's important to use effective search techniques like keywords, Boolean operators, and specialized search engines to find high-quality, relevant sources. The document provides tips for evaluating sources and creating bibliographies to properly cite materials.
Evaluatingwebsites
The document provides tips for evaluating the reliability of websites by looking at the author, accuracy of information, potential for bias, and date of last update. It advises checking for author credentials and organizational affiliation, comparing information across sites, considering the purpose and potential financial motivations of the site, and ensuring content and links are up-to-date. Examples suggest .gov, .edu and well-known sites are generally more reliable than individual authors or sites intended to sell products.
Presentation has Typo3
The document provides guidance for evaluating the reliability of websites. It outlines six criteria for assessment: purpose, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage, and design. A reliable website clearly establishes its purpose, cites authoritative sources, maintains an objective perspective, keeps its content up-to-date, provides sufficient information for the topic, and presents information in a well-organized manner free of errors. Mastering these evaluation techniques helps students identify credible sources for research.
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27Riverside County Office of Education
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It discusses how information can spread quickly online before being verified. Readers are encouraged to scrutinize sources by considering whether the author is an expert, has an agenda, and cites evidence. Search engines like SweetSearch that curate reliable sources are recommended. The conclusion emphasizes that credible ideas will be supported by many trustworthy sources and the scientific process rather than just emotion or a single perspective.Dean r berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
The document discusses determining the credibility of sources when conducting research online. It provides tips for evaluating sources such as checking if the author is a recognized expert, if multiple sources confirm the information, and if the source has biases. The document also recommends specialized search engines like SweetSearch and FindingDulcinea that curate reliable newspaper articles. Certain domains like .edu, .gov and websites from reputable organizations can also be more trustworthy sources of information. Students are advised to exercise critical thinking and verify facts from multiple credible sources.
Similar to Web Site Evaluation (20)
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
Dean r berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Dean r berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Recently uploaded
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcA Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit
Digital Artifact 1 - 10VCD Environments Unit - NGV Pavilion Concept Design
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS Template 2023-2024 by: Irene S. Rueco
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Recently uploaded (20)
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Web Site Evaluation
- 1. Web Site Evaluation Critical Thinking About What You See On The Web.