Today
1)   Icebreaker
2)   Quick overview of a few ideas from the readings
3)   Your turn – group work with readings
4)   Report back/email to Dr. Phill
5)   Some work time
6)   Next week…
Icebreaker
For today…
Share your name, obviously, and tell us what the oldest thing
you own is (excluding antiques… the thing you’ve had the
longest, presumably acquiring new or newish).
Dr. Phill still has one of these:

               It’s a talking Alf doll (it took cassettes,
               like Teddy Ruxpin). I got it for my 9th
               birthday. Interesting– perhaps—fact. I
               used it as a guest speaker as part of my
               senior capstone presentation.

               It’s from 1986. Which means it’s older
               than most Miami students. *cringe*
Random digression: does my dog look like
Alf?
Today…
… I want us to engage the readings and really sort of grapple with
them, but as you might guess, if we tried to grapple with every part of
all five of those readings we’d end up sitting here a long, long time
grappling with a big ol’ bunch of ideas.

So I’m going to suggest a strategy– pull key ideas and illustrate how
they work/see if we can convert them to a sort of tool, or a roadmap, if
you will, to understanding visual rhetoric.

Something like this:
Barthes challenges us thusly:

“Now even– and above all if– the image is in a certain manner
the limit of meaning, it permits the consideration of a
veritable ontology of the process of signification. How does
meaning get into the image? Where does it end? And if it
ends, what is there beyond?”




                                                 Roland Barthes
What?
So….
.. Images carry meaning. But how’d the meaning GET there, Barthes
asks us to consider.
Gunther Kress



Kress tells us:

“The approach from Social Semiotics not only draws attention
to the many kinds of meanings which are at issue in design,
but the “social” in “Social Semiotics” draws attention to the
fact that meanings always relate to specific societies and their
cultures, and to the meanings of the members of those
cultures.”
Like…
These images have meaning…
…because we know them.
They emerge from our culture and are reinforced by our culture.
Recognize this?




That isn’t this, is it? =
Or is it?
                            S
Walter Benjamin



Benjamin, who I promise is not the bad guy from Apt Pupil
even if he looks like him, reminds us:

“In principle a work of art has always been reproducible. Man-
made artifacts could always be imitated by men. Replicas
were made by pupils in practice of their craft, by masters for
diffusing their works, and, finally, by third parties in the
pursuit of gain.”
More on copying later…
Wysocki reminds us:

“Because we have all grown up in densely visually constructed
environments, usually with little overt instruction or awareness of
how the construction takes place, it is easy to think of the visual
elements of texts as simply happening or appearing…as though…
television sitcoms were the result of a camera crew following a
typical family through their day.”




   Anne Wysocki
Single, nerdy college professor on TV
IRL
This remind you of your friends sitting
around?
And these are just normal people enjoying
normal products, right?
What Wysocki would ask us to do is…
..ask why. Think about why those images are chosen.

And maybe more importantly… why don’t people think about it/why
isn’t it sort of a big deal to most Americans?
Now it’s your turn
Break into five groups. That should mean 4 or 5 per group.
Once you’re grouped, from my podium going clockwise around the
room:
Group 1: Kress
Group 2: Barthes
Group 3: Wysocki, Eyes
Group 4: Benjamin
Group 5: Wysocki, Meaning of Texts

Pick between no less than 1 and no more than 3 main ideas, support
them with source quotes, and find examples for discussion. As you
finish, email me your materials: alexanp3@miamioh.edu
With our remaining time…
..please resume working on your class website headers.

Also note that design task 2 is to create a header– much like the class
one– for your response blog. You may work on that during this time if
you wish as well.
For Tuesday
Read for class: Williams non-designers design book Chapters 4
& 5: repetition & contrast; Kimball & Hawkins Chapter 1

In class, we will begin talking much more about how all of this
relates to down and dirty document design.

Visual Rhetoric, January 24, 2013

  • 2.
    Today 1) Icebreaker 2) Quick overview of a few ideas from the readings 3) Your turn – group work with readings 4) Report back/email to Dr. Phill 5) Some work time 6) Next week…
  • 3.
    Icebreaker For today… Share yourname, obviously, and tell us what the oldest thing you own is (excluding antiques… the thing you’ve had the longest, presumably acquiring new or newish).
  • 4.
    Dr. Phill stillhas one of these: It’s a talking Alf doll (it took cassettes, like Teddy Ruxpin). I got it for my 9th birthday. Interesting– perhaps—fact. I used it as a guest speaker as part of my senior capstone presentation. It’s from 1986. Which means it’s older than most Miami students. *cringe*
  • 5.
    Random digression: doesmy dog look like Alf?
  • 6.
    Today… … I wantus to engage the readings and really sort of grapple with them, but as you might guess, if we tried to grapple with every part of all five of those readings we’d end up sitting here a long, long time grappling with a big ol’ bunch of ideas. So I’m going to suggest a strategy– pull key ideas and illustrate how they work/see if we can convert them to a sort of tool, or a roadmap, if you will, to understanding visual rhetoric. Something like this:
  • 7.
    Barthes challenges usthusly: “Now even– and above all if– the image is in a certain manner the limit of meaning, it permits the consideration of a veritable ontology of the process of signification. How does meaning get into the image? Where does it end? And if it ends, what is there beyond?” Roland Barthes
  • 8.
  • 12.
    So…. .. Images carrymeaning. But how’d the meaning GET there, Barthes asks us to consider.
  • 13.
    Gunther Kress Kress tellsus: “The approach from Social Semiotics not only draws attention to the many kinds of meanings which are at issue in design, but the “social” in “Social Semiotics” draws attention to the fact that meanings always relate to specific societies and their cultures, and to the meanings of the members of those cultures.”
  • 14.
  • 17.
    These images havemeaning… …because we know them. They emerge from our culture and are reinforced by our culture. Recognize this? That isn’t this, is it? = Or is it? S
  • 18.
    Walter Benjamin Benjamin, whoI promise is not the bad guy from Apt Pupil even if he looks like him, reminds us: “In principle a work of art has always been reproducible. Man- made artifacts could always be imitated by men. Replicas were made by pupils in practice of their craft, by masters for diffusing their works, and, finally, by third parties in the pursuit of gain.”
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Wysocki reminds us: “Becausewe have all grown up in densely visually constructed environments, usually with little overt instruction or awareness of how the construction takes place, it is easy to think of the visual elements of texts as simply happening or appearing…as though… television sitcoms were the result of a camera crew following a typical family through their day.” Anne Wysocki
  • 22.
    Single, nerdy collegeprofessor on TV
  • 23.
  • 24.
    This remind youof your friends sitting around?
  • 26.
    And these arejust normal people enjoying normal products, right?
  • 27.
    What Wysocki wouldask us to do is… ..ask why. Think about why those images are chosen. And maybe more importantly… why don’t people think about it/why isn’t it sort of a big deal to most Americans?
  • 28.
    Now it’s yourturn Break into five groups. That should mean 4 or 5 per group. Once you’re grouped, from my podium going clockwise around the room: Group 1: Kress Group 2: Barthes Group 3: Wysocki, Eyes Group 4: Benjamin Group 5: Wysocki, Meaning of Texts Pick between no less than 1 and no more than 3 main ideas, support them with source quotes, and find examples for discussion. As you finish, email me your materials: alexanp3@miamioh.edu
  • 29.
    With our remainingtime… ..please resume working on your class website headers. Also note that design task 2 is to create a header– much like the class one– for your response blog. You may work on that during this time if you wish as well.
  • 30.
    For Tuesday Read forclass: Williams non-designers design book Chapters 4 & 5: repetition & contrast; Kimball & Hawkins Chapter 1 In class, we will begin talking much more about how all of this relates to down and dirty document design.