The match between UMF Vikingur Olafsvik and F.C. Keflavik ended with a score of 1-3. In the first half, UMF Vikingur Olafsvik dominated possession and created chances, scoring a goal. However, they failed to convert other opportunities. In the second half, UMF Vikingur Olafsvik conceded goals from a corner kick and penalty, becoming nervous and making errors. They lost their lead and discipline, allowing F.C. Keflavik to score again on a counterattack. The analysis concluded that UMF Vikingur Olafsvik needed to improve converting chances, maintaining composure after conceding goals, and preventing counter

1. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
ANALYSIS MATCH
Home: UMF Vikingur Olafsvik
Awey: F.C. Keflavik
Candidate: Šarić Dževad
Date: 16.08.2013.

2. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
TIME: 19:15 h
PITCH: OLAFSVIK-CITY STADIUM
TIPE OF THE GAME: CHANPIONSHIP-PEPSI LEAGUE
TOTAL NUMBER OF VIEWERS: 500
THE INJURED PLAYERS: %
PENALIZED PLAYERS: %
SCORING: 1:0-3min,1:1-64min,1:2-69min,1:3-90min
FIRS HALFTIME: 1:0
FINAL RESULT: 1:3
WORNING PLAYERS:OLAFSVIK: Ž.5, 7; KEFLAVIK: Ž.16, 25
.... Team to be analyzed .... Another team
RB. Name and surname RB. Name and surname
30 Kaspars Ikstens (G) 12 David Preece (G)
4 Damir Muminovic 4 Haraldur Freyr (C)
5 Björn Pálsson 5 Andri Freysson
7 Tomasz Luba 7 Jóhann Guðmundsson
11 Eyþór Helgi Birgisson 9 Arnór Ingvi Traustason
13 Emir Dokara 10 Hörður Sveinsson
15 Abdel-Farid Zato-Arouna 14 Halldór Halldórsson
17 Guðmundur Steinn (C) 16 Marjan Jugovic
19 Jernej Leskovar 23 Sigurbergur Elísson
20 Eldar Masic 25 Frans Elvarsson
22 Brynjar Kristmundsson 27 Fuad Gazibegoivc
1 Einar Hjörleifsson (G) 21 Bergsteinn Magnússon (G)
6 Arnar Már Björgvinsson 2 Benis Krasniqi
9 Kristinn Magnús 13 Theodór Halldórsson
14 Anton Jónas Illugason 19 Ásgrímur Rúnarsson
18 Alfreð Már Hjaltalín 20 Magnús Þórir Matthíasson
21 Fannar Hilmarsson 22 Magnús Þór Magnússon
25 Insa Bohigues Fransisco 28 Elías Már Ómarsson
7
20
4
22
19
13
5
17
11
30
1:4:3:3 1:4:3:3

3. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
GENERAL PICTURE OF FIRST HALFTIME:
The team started off with a system of 1: 4: 3: 3
Throughout the first half of the game, initiatives was on our side, which
indicates possession and chances that we are created in the first 35' of the
game.
Fast and precise ball circulation within and between the lines.
Good cooperation between the players in connecting lines and line of
attack, creating chances from midfield, employing Eyþór and Jerney with
deep balls in the empty space. After one such action Eyþór scored the lead
goal for 1: 0, which is the result of the first halftime.
Extremely bad realization after created opportunities.
Expressed a high level of communication between the players at the
moment of the game PLP.
Aggressive play, at the moment when the opponent attacks carried out
building, between the player in connecting lines and line of attack, which
resulted in a large number of steals balls on the opponent's side of the field.
A player who excels in the first half were Farid and Eytor, expressed
aggressiveness and fighting spirit, a great number of steals and aerial duels
after a long ball from the back row opponents by Farida, while Eytor real big
problems to the opponent on the left-hand side in the game 1v1.
The high level of aggressiveness and motivation, expressed a big desire to
for wining from all players in the team.
Most of the time spent in the opponent's half of the field, the last line
positioned high, 35-40 meters from the owen goal.
The opposing team has played on the counter attack.
7
13
15
19
20
11

4. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
The team started the second half in the same system and with the same
players.
The first 15' of second halftime elapsed in our initiative, where we created
two chances to score second goal, bad reaction Eytora and Gudmundura.
In 64' after a corner on the left side and confusion in the defense in front of
our own goal, visitors come up to equalization 1:1.
After conceding a goal, there was a nervousness among the players. Skips
the creation line, a long ball from the back line by Tomas and Damir according
Gudmundur. A large number of errors in the creation line at a time when the
construction is carried out attacks, even more reassuring in the short passing
game in the middle.
The bad communication between the last line players when the opponent is
done building attack, after a long ball launched in the box Tomas jumps in a
duel with an opposing player and touches the ball with his hand, judge gives a
penalty for Keflavik and visitors go up for leadership of the 1:2.
Inane and hastiness in building attack and the game in front of the goal,
opens up space for the opponent for counter attack after turnovers. After one
such situation, turnovers by Masica on the opposing side of the field and
played counter-attacks, visitors came up for leadership of 1:3.
Disturbed the team spirit and discipline of the game, players lose their
positions on the field (Bjosi, Gudmundur), some players late in the shift
towards the ball (Jernej - lack of conditional shape).
Three changes in the second half (Eytor, Bjosi and Jernej they left and
Arnar, Alfred and Fanar entered in the game). Upon leaving the field Eeitor,
we lost the pervasiveness by the left side of the field where he played.
GENERAL PICTURE OF SECOND HALFTIME:
5
19
17
11
20

5. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
BALL POSSESSION:
The effective distance, good occupation of the field and working together
within and between the lines of defense and midfield at the time of
construction of the attack in the first half.
Creating chances in the middle. After one such action, where the Emir
played the ball to Farida and he played ball on to Jerney, who employs
Masica in the middle of the field, where he frees the players and employs
with deep ball Eytora on the other side of the field we come to the leadership
of the 1:0.
The bad realization after a well created an opportunity, especially in the
first 35'.
Most of the balls went on Eytora where he tried through play 1v1 with their
side player to make the advantage and to insert ball at box to Gudmundur or
own initiative completed the atac and make shoot at goal.
In the second half, after conceding a goal, there is haste and uncertainty
in play short passes in the middle (Masic, Bjosi and Farid), which results in
skipping connecting lines with long balls by Tomas and Damir.
A large number of errors in the handover of the ball between players in
creation line and attackers line in the middle of the field, as a result of the low
level of concentration and poor assessment of the situation.
After a lost ball in midfield individual players are slowly returning to their
positions in the defense wich opponent leaves plenty of room for a counter
attack, where after one such situation they scored the goal for lead to 1:3.
11
17
15
13
20

6. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
INTERRUPTIONS AND GOALS
11
1:0 3' (Eytor)
20
17
11
17
7

7. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
OPOSIT BALL POSSESSION:
In the first half the players are compact in the field and aggressive in
pressure on the player with the ball and the players near the ball, which
resulted in a large number of steals balls on the opposing side of the field
at the time of the beginning of construction of the attack the opposing
team.
The high level of communication and discipline in defense in the first half
between the lines and within the line, which is especially obvious between
the midfield line and attack.
The opposing team plays on the counter attack and through balls into
space trying to find wingers and strikers. Skipping lines of midfield. What
they been successful in the second half, because certain players
(Gudmunur, Arnar, Fanar) late with timely coverage of the players with the
ball and the players near the ball, and the last line was out deep. That's a
whole lot of space between the back line and goalkeeper.
In the second half after a goal, loses compactness in some lines,
especially lines of midfield, as some players lose their positions (Bjosi,
Jernej).
Uncertainty in the line of defense, especially after conceding a goal after
a corner kick. Poor level of communication (Tomas and Damir).
The second goal also received from the standard situation, a cross from
the depth of the field, after a foul where Tomas in air duel with an
opponent touches the ball with his hand in penalty box and refery givs a
penalty for opponents.
In the third goals, bad were set Tomas and Damir, after throwing on the
left side of the field, after a counter attack, the opposing player between
them two scores for head 1:3.
4 7

8. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
INTERRUPTIONS AND GOALS
1:1 64' (Guđmundsson)
7
5
1:2 69' (Guđmundsson)
7
1:3 90' (Mathiasson)
20

9. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
TRANSFORMATION OF WHEN LOST BALL:
In the first half after turnovers players have exerted pressure on the
current player with the ball and the players near the ball, and quickly
occupied the primary organization in defense.
Most of the balls that were lost in the first half were on the opposing
side of the field, at the time of transfer of the ball from the midfield line in
the line of attack. In these situations Eytor, Jerney and Gudmundur
immediately exerted pressure on the player with the ball and the players
near the ball as the players come from the back row to uncontrolled
played long balls that are almost certainly end out of the game or our
possession.
In the second half, missing the current pressure on the player with the
ball and the players near the ball by Fanara, Arnara and Alfred, which
enables smooth playing a long ball at the attacker which leaves reversal
ball to midfielder who enter the zone of attack from another plan, is
employing winger or on its own initiative end in the act of shooting at
goal.
After a lost ball in midfield, most notably occurred in the second half,
the players are slowly returning to their positions in the defense that
leaves plenty of room for a counter attack, from such a situation we
received goal for result of 1: 3.
Very low level of communication, no one on the field does not give a
sign of loss of possession, absent aggressively cover players with the ball
and the players near the ball.
13
20
17
11

10. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
TRANSFORMATION OF WHEN THE WIN BALL:
On several occasions after steals a ball in front of the oposit goall
players do not immediately kick into the goal. Make bad decisions at
the time.
Most of the balls we took on the opposing side of the field in the
beginning of the construction of the attack the opposing team,
however lacking currently shooting on goal by players with ball.
After steals in the middle (Masic, Farid) very often the ball is played
backwards or played short passing between themselves, does not
follow the movement of the wing players (Eytor and Jernej) entering
the free space. Absent enactment of adding depth pass to an empty
space, which the opponent has sufficient time to return to the basic
formation in defense.
17 11

11. Analisis of the match – Uefa PRO
N/F SBIH A training center for coaches
CONCLUSION:
From the analysis of the match UMF Vikingur O. - F.C. Keflavik can
be concluded that there is a data capture on certain shortcomings in
the game UMF Vikingur O. appearing in all four games of torque, and
are expressed at the time of PL games, at the moment of creating
chances and achieving goals.